|
War on Fox News diminishes the White House
Lu Powell wrote:
Cokie and Steve Roberts gives all something to think about in their column titled "War on Fox News diminishes the White House " at: http://www.jewishworldreview.com/1009/croberts.php3 "....Team Obama was spoiled during the campaign by highly favorable press coverage that flummoxed their rivals (just ask Hillary). They benefited from what we have always believed is the most consistent bias in journalism: Reporters are in favor of a good story and against whoever is in power. "Like Obama, Jimmy Carter, Ronald Reagan, Bill Clinton and George W. Bush all profited from being outsiders who challenged a familiar and fatigued establishment. (The only winner in 33 years who followed a different strategy was George H.W. Bush). Once the election is over, however, the pattern shifts. The press tilts against the man who has gone from insurgent to insider; criticizing a president is a better story than praising him, and that's a good thing. Every president has enormous ability to shape and control what the public hears and sees; only an independent media can keep him honest and hold him accountable. "So the White House should stop whining about a vast Fox wing conspiracy. It goes with the territory." I'm sure the outrageous summer, with the lies about the health care plan, Death Panels, has something to do with the decision to finally do something. What should they do, just let Fox continue to get more and more off base? You would think the extreme death panel argument would drive people away from the source. Just how far would they take making **** up? |
War on Fox News diminishes the White House
"Jim" wrote in message
m... Lu Powell wrote: Cokie and Steve Roberts gives all something to think about in their column titled "War on Fox News diminishes the White House " at: http://www.jewishworldreview.com/1009/croberts.php3 "....Team Obama was spoiled during the campaign by highly favorable press coverage that flummoxed their rivals (just ask Hillary). They benefited from what we have always believed is the most consistent bias in journalism: Reporters are in favor of a good story and against whoever is in power. "Like Obama, Jimmy Carter, Ronald Reagan, Bill Clinton and George W. Bush all profited from being outsiders who challenged a familiar and fatigued establishment. (The only winner in 33 years who followed a different strategy was George H.W. Bush). Once the election is over, however, the pattern shifts. The press tilts against the man who has gone from insurgent to insider; criticizing a president is a better story than praising him, and that's a good thing. Every president has enormous ability to shape and control what the public hears and sees; only an independent media can keep him honest and hold him accountable. "So the White House should stop whining about a vast Fox wing conspiracy. It goes with the territory." I'm sure the outrageous summer, with the lies about the health care plan, Death Panels, has something to do with the decision to finally do something. What should they do, just let Fox continue to get more and more off base? You would think the extreme death panel argument would drive people away from the source. Just how far would they take making **** up? Did they kill grandma? Nope. I just read she's still baby sitting. -- Nom=de=Plume |
War on Fox News diminishes the White House
On Thu, 22 Oct 2009 20:49:50 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote: "Jim" wrote in message om... Lu Powell wrote: Cokie and Steve Roberts gives all something to think about in their column titled "War on Fox News diminishes the White House " at: http://www.jewishworldreview.com/1009/croberts.php3 "....Team Obama was spoiled during the campaign by highly favorable press coverage that flummoxed their rivals (just ask Hillary). They benefited from what we have always believed is the most consistent bias in journalism: Reporters are in favor of a good story and against whoever is in power. "Like Obama, Jimmy Carter, Ronald Reagan, Bill Clinton and George W. Bush all profited from being outsiders who challenged a familiar and fatigued establishment. (The only winner in 33 years who followed a different strategy was George H.W. Bush). Once the election is over, however, the pattern shifts. The press tilts against the man who has gone from insurgent to insider; criticizing a president is a better story than praising him, and that's a good thing. Every president has enormous ability to shape and control what the public hears and sees; only an independent media can keep him honest and hold him accountable. "So the White House should stop whining about a vast Fox wing conspiracy. It goes with the territory." I'm sure the outrageous summer, with the lies about the health care plan, Death Panels, has something to do with the decision to finally do something. What should they do, just let Fox continue to get more and more off base? You would think the extreme death panel argument would drive people away from the source. Just how far would they take making **** up? Did they kill grandma? Nope. I just read she's still baby sitting. They're gonna, you watch!!! |
War on Fox News diminishes the White House
nom=de=plume wrote:
"Jim" wrote in message m... Lu Powell wrote: Cokie and Steve Roberts gives all something to think about in their column titled "War on Fox News diminishes the White House " at: http://www.jewishworldreview.com/1009/croberts.php3 "....Team Obama was spoiled during the campaign by highly favorable press coverage that flummoxed their rivals (just ask Hillary). They benefited from what we have always believed is the most consistent bias in journalism: Reporters are in favor of a good story and against whoever is in power. "Like Obama, Jimmy Carter, Ronald Reagan, Bill Clinton and George W. Bush all profited from being outsiders who challenged a familiar and fatigued establishment. (The only winner in 33 years who followed a different strategy was George H.W. Bush). Once the election is over, however, the pattern shifts. The press tilts against the man who has gone from insurgent to insider; criticizing a president is a better story than praising him, and that's a good thing. Every president has enormous ability to shape and control what the public hears and sees; only an independent media can keep him honest and hold him accountable. "So the White House should stop whining about a vast Fox wing conspiracy. It goes with the territory." I'm sure the outrageous summer, with the lies about the health care plan, Death Panels, has something to do with the decision to finally do something. What should they do, just let Fox continue to get more and more off base? You would think the extreme death panel argument would drive people away from the source. Just how far would they take making **** up? Did they kill grandma? Nope. I just read she's still baby sitting. She's one of the lucky ones. I suggest that she keep a low profile. lol lol |
War on Fox News diminishes the White House
"Jim" wrote in message
... nom=de=plume wrote: "Jim" wrote in message m... Lu Powell wrote: Cokie and Steve Roberts gives all something to think about in their column titled "War on Fox News diminishes the White House " at: http://www.jewishworldreview.com/1009/croberts.php3 "....Team Obama was spoiled during the campaign by highly favorable press coverage that flummoxed their rivals (just ask Hillary). They benefited from what we have always believed is the most consistent bias in journalism: Reporters are in favor of a good story and against whoever is in power. "Like Obama, Jimmy Carter, Ronald Reagan, Bill Clinton and George W. Bush all profited from being outsiders who challenged a familiar and fatigued establishment. (The only winner in 33 years who followed a different strategy was George H.W. Bush). Once the election is over, however, the pattern shifts. The press tilts against the man who has gone from insurgent to insider; criticizing a president is a better story than praising him, and that's a good thing. Every president has enormous ability to shape and control what the public hears and sees; only an independent media can keep him honest and hold him accountable. "So the White House should stop whining about a vast Fox wing conspiracy. It goes with the territory." I'm sure the outrageous summer, with the lies about the health care plan, Death Panels, has something to do with the decision to finally do something. What should they do, just let Fox continue to get more and more off base? You would think the extreme death panel argument would drive people away from the source. Just how far would they take making **** up? Did they kill grandma? Nope. I just read she's still baby sitting. She's one of the lucky ones. I suggest that she keep a low profile. lol lol Fox news is a "legitimate faction," according to Charles Krauthammer. Faction: A group of persons forming a cohesive, usually contentious minority within a larger group. Sound about right. It's certain not much more than that. -- Nom=de=Plume |
War on Fox News diminishes the White House
In article ,
says... "Jim" wrote in message ... nom=de=plume wrote: "Jim" wrote in message m... Lu Powell wrote: Cokie and Steve Roberts gives all something to think about in their column titled "War on Fox News diminishes the White House " at: http://www.jewishworldreview.com/1009/croberts.php3 "....Team Obama was spoiled during the campaign by highly favorable press coverage that flummoxed their rivals (just ask Hillary). They benefited from what we have always believed is the most consistent bias in journalism: Reporters are in favor of a good story and against whoever is in power. "Like Obama, Jimmy Carter, Ronald Reagan, Bill Clinton and George W. Bush all profited from being outsiders who challenged a familiar and fatigued establishment. (The only winner in 33 years who followed a different strategy was George H.W. Bush). Once the election is over, however, the pattern shifts. The press tilts against the man who has gone from insurgent to insider; criticizing a president is a better story than praising him, and that's a good thing. Every president has enormous ability to shape and control what the public hears and sees; only an independent media can keep him honest and hold him accountable. "So the White House should stop whining about a vast Fox wing conspiracy. It goes with the territory." I'm sure the outrageous summer, with the lies about the health care plan, Death Panels, has something to do with the decision to finally do something. What should they do, just let Fox continue to get more and more off base? You would think the extreme death panel argument would drive people away from the source. Just how far would they take making **** up? Did they kill grandma? Nope. I just read she's still baby sitting. She's one of the lucky ones. I suggest that she keep a low profile. lol lol Fox news is a "legitimate faction," according to Charles Krauthammer. Faction: A group of persons forming a cohesive, usually contentious minority within a larger group. Sound about right. It's certain not much more than that. Yeah, and if you take the viewership of all of the minority media put together, it still can't touch FOX. Why is it you are so afraid of opposition and real questions.. Remember, Hillary started the whole "no access" thing back over a decade ago... |
War on Fox News diminishes the White House
"Tosk" wrote in message
... In article , says... "Jim" wrote in message ... nom=de=plume wrote: "Jim" wrote in message m... Lu Powell wrote: Cokie and Steve Roberts gives all something to think about in their column titled "War on Fox News diminishes the White House " at: http://www.jewishworldreview.com/1009/croberts.php3 "....Team Obama was spoiled during the campaign by highly favorable press coverage that flummoxed their rivals (just ask Hillary). They benefited from what we have always believed is the most consistent bias in journalism: Reporters are in favor of a good story and against whoever is in power. "Like Obama, Jimmy Carter, Ronald Reagan, Bill Clinton and George W. Bush all profited from being outsiders who challenged a familiar and fatigued establishment. (The only winner in 33 years who followed a different strategy was George H.W. Bush). Once the election is over, however, the pattern shifts. The press tilts against the man who has gone from insurgent to insider; criticizing a president is a better story than praising him, and that's a good thing. Every president has enormous ability to shape and control what the public hears and sees; only an independent media can keep him honest and hold him accountable. "So the White House should stop whining about a vast Fox wing conspiracy. It goes with the territory." I'm sure the outrageous summer, with the lies about the health care plan, Death Panels, has something to do with the decision to finally do something. What should they do, just let Fox continue to get more and more off base? You would think the extreme death panel argument would drive people away from the source. Just how far would they take making **** up? Did they kill grandma? Nope. I just read she's still baby sitting. She's one of the lucky ones. I suggest that she keep a low profile. lol lol Fox news is a "legitimate faction," according to Charles Krauthammer. Faction: A group of persons forming a cohesive, usually contentious minority within a larger group. Sound about right. It's certain not much more than that. Yeah, and if you take the viewership of all of the minority media put together, it still can't touch FOX. Why is it you are so afraid of opposition and real questions.. Remember, Hillary started the whole "no access" thing back over a decade ago... Why do you think I'm afraid of Fox? They're a tiny minority. They're not even a decent shot with a shotgun. -- Nom=de=Plume |
War on Fox News diminishes the White House
In article ,
says... "Tosk" wrote in message ... In article , says... "Jim" wrote in message ... nom=de=plume wrote: "Jim" wrote in message m... Lu Powell wrote: Cokie and Steve Roberts gives all something to think about in their column titled "War on Fox News diminishes the White House " at: http://www.jewishworldreview.com/1009/croberts.php3 "....Team Obama was spoiled during the campaign by highly favorable press coverage that flummoxed their rivals (just ask Hillary). They benefited from what we have always believed is the most consistent bias in journalism: Reporters are in favor of a good story and against whoever is in power. "Like Obama, Jimmy Carter, Ronald Reagan, Bill Clinton and George W. Bush all profited from being outsiders who challenged a familiar and fatigued establishment. (The only winner in 33 years who followed a different strategy was George H.W. Bush). Once the election is over, however, the pattern shifts. The press tilts against the man who has gone from insurgent to insider; criticizing a president is a better story than praising him, and that's a good thing. Every president has enormous ability to shape and control what the public hears and sees; only an independent media can keep him honest and hold him accountable. "So the White House should stop whining about a vast Fox wing conspiracy. It goes with the territory." I'm sure the outrageous summer, with the lies about the health care plan, Death Panels, has something to do with the decision to finally do something. What should they do, just let Fox continue to get more and more off base? You would think the extreme death panel argument would drive people away from the source. Just how far would they take making **** up? Did they kill grandma? Nope. I just read she's still baby sitting. She's one of the lucky ones. I suggest that she keep a low profile. lol lol Fox news is a "legitimate faction," according to Charles Krauthammer. Faction: A group of persons forming a cohesive, usually contentious minority within a larger group. Sound about right. It's certain not much more than that. Yeah, and if you take the viewership of all of the minority media put together, it still can't touch FOX. Why is it you are so afraid of opposition and real questions.. Remember, Hillary started the whole "no access" thing back over a decade ago... Why do you think I'm afraid of Fox? They're a tiny minority. They're not even a decent shot with a shotgun. Tiny Minority? Whew, if you are going to continue to make it up as you go along, I am done for now... |
War on Fox News diminishes the White House
On Fri, 23 Oct 2009 12:54:31 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote: "Tosk" wrote in message ... In article , says... "Jim" wrote in message ... nom=de=plume wrote: "Jim" wrote in message m... Lu Powell wrote: Cokie and Steve Roberts gives all something to think about in their column titled "War on Fox News diminishes the White House " at: http://www.jewishworldreview.com/1009/croberts.php3 "....Team Obama was spoiled during the campaign by highly favorable press coverage that flummoxed their rivals (just ask Hillary). They benefited from what we have always believed is the most consistent bias in journalism: Reporters are in favor of a good story and against whoever is in power. "Like Obama, Jimmy Carter, Ronald Reagan, Bill Clinton and George W. Bush all profited from being outsiders who challenged a familiar and fatigued establishment. (The only winner in 33 years who followed a different strategy was George H.W. Bush). Once the election is over, however, the pattern shifts. The press tilts against the man who has gone from insurgent to insider; criticizing a president is a better story than praising him, and that's a good thing. Every president has enormous ability to shape and control what the public hears and sees; only an independent media can keep him honest and hold him accountable. "So the White House should stop whining about a vast Fox wing conspiracy. It goes with the territory." I'm sure the outrageous summer, with the lies about the health care plan, Death Panels, has something to do with the decision to finally do something. What should they do, just let Fox continue to get more and more off base? You would think the extreme death panel argument would drive people away from the source. Just how far would they take making **** up? Did they kill grandma? Nope. I just read she's still baby sitting. She's one of the lucky ones. I suggest that she keep a low profile. lol lol Fox news is a "legitimate faction," according to Charles Krauthammer. Faction: A group of persons forming a cohesive, usually contentious minority within a larger group. Sound about right. It's certain not much more than that. Yeah, and if you take the viewership of all of the minority media put together, it still can't touch FOX. Why is it you are so afraid of opposition and real questions.. Remember, Hillary started the whole "no access" thing back over a decade ago... Why do you think I'm afraid of Fox? They're a tiny minority. They're not even a decent shot with a shotgun. Empty bluster from The Freak. Fox handles a shotgun with similar skill to The Dick Cheney. The conservatives seem not to know where to aim these days. All sorts of collateral and friendly fire taking down their own members. The Freak is in a solid minority however. That 20% will remain loyal to the cause of white christian men dominating the world of female and brown people and all the white women who buy into their bull****. |
War on Fox News diminishes the White House
"Tosk" wrote in message
... In article , says... "Tosk" wrote in message ... In article , says... "Jim" wrote in message ... nom=de=plume wrote: "Jim" wrote in message m... Lu Powell wrote: Cokie and Steve Roberts gives all something to think about in their column titled "War on Fox News diminishes the White House " at: http://www.jewishworldreview.com/1009/croberts.php3 "....Team Obama was spoiled during the campaign by highly favorable press coverage that flummoxed their rivals (just ask Hillary). They benefited from what we have always believed is the most consistent bias in journalism: Reporters are in favor of a good story and against whoever is in power. "Like Obama, Jimmy Carter, Ronald Reagan, Bill Clinton and George W. Bush all profited from being outsiders who challenged a familiar and fatigued establishment. (The only winner in 33 years who followed a different strategy was George H.W. Bush). Once the election is over, however, the pattern shifts. The press tilts against the man who has gone from insurgent to insider; criticizing a president is a better story than praising him, and that's a good thing. Every president has enormous ability to shape and control what the public hears and sees; only an independent media can keep him honest and hold him accountable. "So the White House should stop whining about a vast Fox wing conspiracy. It goes with the territory." I'm sure the outrageous summer, with the lies about the health care plan, Death Panels, has something to do with the decision to finally do something. What should they do, just let Fox continue to get more and more off base? You would think the extreme death panel argument would drive people away from the source. Just how far would they take making **** up? Did they kill grandma? Nope. I just read she's still baby sitting. She's one of the lucky ones. I suggest that she keep a low profile. lol lol Fox news is a "legitimate faction," according to Charles Krauthammer. Faction: A group of persons forming a cohesive, usually contentious minority within a larger group. Sound about right. It's certain not much more than that. Yeah, and if you take the viewership of all of the minority media put together, it still can't touch FOX. Why is it you are so afraid of opposition and real questions.. Remember, Hillary started the whole "no access" thing back over a decade ago... Why do you think I'm afraid of Fox? They're a tiny minority. They're not even a decent shot with a shotgun. Tiny Minority? Whew, if you are going to continue to make it up as you go along, I am done for now... They're self-described as a "faction." That's typically a small minority. -- Nom=de=Plume |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:49 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com