For those who care about "the markets..."
 

"John H." wrote in message
...
On Thu, 15 Oct 2009 13:25:21 -0400, Keith Nuttle
wrote:

wf3h wrote:
On Oct 15, 11:31 am, Keith Nuttle wrote:
wf3h wrote:

don't rely on the right wing media for your news
If you would read what I referenced it is the daily closing for the
DOW
for the last several year. That is not dependent on the obama news
media.

the BLS says the recession started in 12/07.

regardless of your tin foil hat delusions. and bush was president

Again if you look at the DOW closing history, the financial bailout
that
was passed, stabilized the market after the pelosi plunge until obama
took office, then it started the obama slide

obama slide? how is a 10,000 market a 'slide'?

do right wingers know how to count?

The market started to reclaim what it had lost when obama suffered his
first the small defeat at the hands of the congress in the middle of
March 2009.

Read the data.

The market's done quite well since we learned that the Olympics are
not coming to Chicago.

Heck, the market reaction to 'Bama's winning of the Peace Prize shows
it has a keen sense of humor also.


Great. So, now you're claiming that because Chicago didn't get the Olympics,
the market is up? By that logic, because Obama won the Nobel, the markets
went up?

--
Nom=de=Plume

For those who care about "the markets..."
 

On 10/15/09 4:06 PM, nom=de=plume wrote:
wrote in message
...
In , says...

H the K wrote:
On 10/15/09 12:44 PM, wf3h wrote:
On Oct 15, 11:59 am, H the wrote:
On 10/15/09 11:50 AM, wf3h wrote:





On Oct 15, 11:32 am, John wrote:
On Wed, 14 Oct 2009 18:54:11 -0700 (PDT),

wrote:

obama can't repair ALL the damage bush did in a few short
months...

With the amount of money he's going through, he should be able to
do a
lot better than he is.

meaningless. the fact is most of the money has not yet been spent

Where are all the infrastructure projects he was going to get
going?

ROFLMAO!! you know, i'm an engineer and when i see an idiot like you
make a comment like that, it just confirms my view of the right
wing.
you've never worked on an engineering project, have you?
\

Herring claims he was a combat engineer or something like that during
the war he helped lose in Vietnam. Maybe he helped clear minefields.

As an aside, I have seen signs in Maryland proclaiming that all or
part
of the projects being described was funded with stimulus funds.

In Virginia, it took about 1 second to find this:

Published:23-July-2009

By WCIN Staff Writer

The Commonwealth of Virginia will receive $4.8 billion from ARRA.

exactly. they WILL receive funds...they then have to plan the
project, get rights of way, buy property, order material...etc etc
etc...

the morons of the right assume that roads just drop out of the sky.
the rest of us know they have to be built


Morons of the right is so...right.
We certainly have a plethora of them in here...John Herring being a
prime example. But...his buddy Scott Ingersoll is even dumber.


You mutts seem to run in packs.

Harry is real brave under his desk. He had his chance to meet up and get
his beating this summer with me and loogie, but like most little
bitches, he ran for the hills. Seems all of these far lefties are
cowardly little bitches with nothing to add to much of anything...


You sound like a paper tiger... I sincerely doubt you'd have the guts to say
anything like this to my face, and I'm not much of a match physically. It
sure is easy to lie when you don't have to face someone. You must be quite
the manly man with women.



Tosk, aka Scott Ingersoll, spends his weekends in a tent with an
underaged girl. I am not kidding.


--
http://tinyurl.com/ykaa4k7

For those who care about "the markets..."
 

On Thu, 15 Oct 2009 13:08:36 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

"John H." wrote in message
.. .
On Thu, 15 Oct 2009 13:25:21 -0400, Keith Nuttle
wrote:

wf3h wrote:
On Oct 15, 11:31 am, Keith Nuttle wrote:
wf3h wrote:

don't rely on the right wing media for your news
If you would read what I referenced it is the daily closing for the
DOW
for the last several year. That is not dependent on the obama news
media.

the BLS says the recession started in 12/07.

regardless of your tin foil hat delusions. and bush was president

Again if you look at the DOW closing history, the financial bailout
that
was passed, stabilized the market after the pelosi plunge until obama
took office, then it started the obama slide

obama slide? how is a 10,000 market a 'slide'?

do right wingers know how to count?

The market started to reclaim what it had lost when obama suffered his
first the small defeat at the hands of the congress in the middle of
March 2009.

Read the data.

The market's done quite well since we learned that the Olympics are
not coming to Chicago.

Heck, the market reaction to 'Bama's winning of the Peace Prize shows
it has a keen sense of humor also.


Great. So, now you're claiming that because Chicago didn't get the Olympics,
the market is up? By that logic, because Obama won the Nobel, the markets
went up?

Read for content.

The makers and shakers of the market thought the Prize was a good
joke. They love a good joke. So, the market went up. It pays for those
folks to be in a good mood.

For those who care about "the markets..."
 

"John H." wrote in message
...
On Thu, 15 Oct 2009 13:08:36 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

"John H." wrote in message
. ..
On Thu, 15 Oct 2009 13:25:21 -0400, Keith Nuttle
wrote:

wf3h wrote:
On Oct 15, 11:31 am, Keith Nuttle wrote:
wf3h wrote:

don't rely on the right wing media for your news
If you would read what I referenced it is the daily closing for the
DOW
for the last several year. That is not dependent on the obama news
media.

the BLS says the recession started in 12/07.

regardless of your tin foil hat delusions. and bush was president

Again if you look at the DOW closing history, the financial bailout
that
was passed, stabilized the market after the pelosi plunge until obama
took office, then it started the obama slide

obama slide? how is a 10,000 market a 'slide'?

do right wingers know how to count?

The market started to reclaim what it had lost when obama suffered his
first the small defeat at the hands of the congress in the middle of
March 2009.

Read the data.

The market's done quite well since we learned that the Olympics are
not coming to Chicago.

Heck, the market reaction to 'Bama's winning of the Peace Prize shows
it has a keen sense of humor also.


Great. So, now you're claiming that because Chicago didn't get the
Olympics,
the market is up? By that logic, because Obama won the Nobel, the markets
went up?

Read for content.

The makers and shakers of the market thought the Prize was a good
joke. They love a good joke. So, the market went up. It pays for those
folks to be in a good mood.


Sounds like Obama rationale to me....

--
Nom=de=Plume

For those who care about "the markets..."
 

On 10/15/09 4:44 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 15 Oct 2009 12:55:33 -0400, H the K
wrote:

I think the health insurers should lose their anti-trust exemptions.
Frankly, I don't know what public purpose private, for-profit health
insurers serve.

What function does insurance in general have?
Do you want the government to write life, homeowner's and car
insurance too?
They already write flood


Being opposed to private, for-profit health insurance does not mean I
want to put government in its place. There's no reason why truly
not-for-profit companies couldn't handle the job. I do favor a
government-run but not necessarily government-underwritten option for
those who want one.


--
http://tinyurl.com/ykaa4k7

For those who care about "the markets..."
 

On 10/15/09 4:47 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 15 Oct 2009 13:30:58 -0400, John H.
wrote:

BTW another reason to get your sell orders in is to lock in your
profits under the Bush capital gains rates. As soon as they get this
health care deal settled, the next step is paying for it and capital
gains will be one place they "stick it to the rich". Right now you
only pay taxes on gains at a max of 15% and it is really even lower
than that for most people. Plan on that creeping up to your ordinary
income rate.

Some of us have a very minor capital loss to apply to the gains. Maybe
there's not such a reason to rush the sale yet.

If you have enough losses to wash your gains, holding and hoping might
be a better strategy but if you can only wash a small percentage a big
bump in the cap gains tax will hurt you. Better to get out while you
can do it cheaply.


Whew! My half-interest in our strip shopping mall/center partnership in
Connecticut is still doing well. We've lost only one tenant these past
two years for inability to pay, and that tenant was replaced this summer.

We were going to sell the mall and therefore have "proceeds" to
invest...I'm glad every day we did not. It throws off a nice income to
me and to my family lawyer partner up in Connecticut, *and* it provides
a small but steady fee for our accountant, who collects the rents and
pays the bills and supervise maintenance. All three of us have been
close friends since our summer boyhood beach days in Milford. Fifty year
friendships are priceless.





--
http://tinyurl.com/ykaa4k7

For those who care about "the markets..."
 

"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...
"Tosk" wrote in message
...
In article , says...

H the K wrote:
On 10/15/09 12:44 PM, wf3h wrote:
On Oct 15, 11:59 am, H the wrote:
On 10/15/09 11:50 AM, wf3h wrote:





On Oct 15, 11:32 am, John wrote:
On Wed, 14 Oct 2009 18:54:11 -0700 (PDT),

wrote:

obama can't repair ALL the damage bush did in a few short
months...

With the amount of money he's going through, he should be able to
do a
lot better than he is.

meaningless. the fact is most of the money has not yet been spent

Where are all the infrastructure projects he was going to get
going?

ROFLMAO!! you know, i'm an engineer and when i see an idiot like
you
make a comment like that, it just confirms my view of the right
wing.
you've never worked on an engineering project, have you?
\

Herring claims he was a combat engineer or something like that
during
the war he helped lose in Vietnam. Maybe he helped clear minefields.

As an aside, I have seen signs in Maryland proclaiming that all or
part
of the projects being described was funded with stimulus funds.

In Virginia, it took about 1 second to find this:

Published:23-July-2009

By WCIN Staff Writer

The Commonwealth of Virginia will receive $4.8 billion from ARRA.

exactly. they WILL receive funds...they then have to plan the
project, get rights of way, buy property, order material...etc etc
etc...

the morons of the right assume that roads just drop out of the sky.
the rest of us know they have to be built


Morons of the right is so...right.
We certainly have a plethora of them in here...John Herring being a
prime example. But...his buddy Scott Ingersoll is even dumber.


You mutts seem to run in packs.

Harry is real brave under his desk. He had his chance to meet up and get
his beating this summer with me and loogie, but like most little
bitches, he ran for the hills. Seems all of these far lefties are
cowardly little bitches with nothing to add to much of anything...


You sound like a paper tiger... I sincerely doubt you'd have the guts to
say anything like this to my face, and I'm not much of a match physically.
It sure is easy to lie when you don't have to face someone. You must be
quite the manly man with women.

--
Nom=de=Plume

You have 'The Freak' act figured out.
Wish I had saved the correspondence when the Basskisser was threatening to
visit him at his moldy workshop.
The Freak had lined up every able bodied man, woman and child to put between
himself and the Basskisser.
It was priceless...a great idea for a comedy skit.

For those who care about "the markets..."
 

H the K wrote:
On 10/15/09 4:44 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 15 Oct 2009 12:55:33 -0400, H the K
wrote:

I think the health insurers should lose their anti-trust exemptions.
Frankly, I don't know what public purpose private, for-profit health
insurers serve.

What function does insurance in general have?
Do you want the government to write life, homeowner's and car
insurance too?
They already write flood


Being opposed to private, for-profit health insurance does not mean I
want to put government in its place. There's no reason why truly
not-for-profit companies couldn't handle the job. I do favor a
government-run but not necessarily government-underwritten option for
those who want one.


You are beginning to sound like Princess Little Feather. You want a
private, not for profit company to fund a government managed health
plan. Sure. I want in. Where do I sign up?

For those who care about "the markets..."
 

"Jim" wrote in message
...
H the K wrote:
On 10/15/09 4:44 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 15 Oct 2009 12:55:33 -0400, H the K
wrote:

I think the health insurers should lose their anti-trust exemptions.
Frankly, I don't know what public purpose private, for-profit health
insurers serve.

What function does insurance in general have?
Do you want the government to write life, homeowner's and car
insurance too?
They already write flood


Being opposed to private, for-profit health insurance does not mean I
want to put government in its place. There's no reason why truly
not-for-profit companies couldn't handle the job. I do favor a
government-run but not necessarily government-underwritten option for
those who want one.


You are beginning to sound like Princess Little Feather. You want a
private, not for profit company to fund a government managed health plan.
Sure. I want in. Where do I sign up?

Right here..cupcake. That's exactly what we have in Nova Scotia.
Medavie Blue Cross administers our MSI, Seniors Pharmacare, Family Drug
Plan & Childhood Dental Plan + the Diabetes Program

For those who care about "the markets..."
 

Don White wrote:
"Jim" wrote in message
...
H the K wrote:
On 10/15/09 4:44 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 15 Oct 2009 12:55:33 -0400, H the K
wrote:

I think the health insurers should lose their anti-trust exemptions.
Frankly, I don't know what public purpose private, for-profit health
insurers serve.
What function does insurance in general have?
Do you want the government to write life, homeowner's and car
insurance too?
They already write flood

Being opposed to private, for-profit health insurance does not mean I
want to put government in its place. There's no reason why truly
not-for-profit companies couldn't handle the job. I do favor a
government-run but not necessarily government-underwritten option for
those who want one.


You are beginning to sound like Princess Little Feather. You want a
private, not for profit company to fund a government managed health plan.
Sure. I want in. Where do I sign up?

Right here..cupcake. That's exactly what we have in Nova Scotia.
Medavie Blue Cross administers our MSI, Seniors Pharmacare, Family Drug
Plan & Childhood Dental Plan + the Diabetes Program



Sacrebleu Save the sweet talk for the lonely princess. Did you know that
managed and administered are essentially the same. So unless Blue Cross
is the government you are way far out mistaken.