BoatBanter.com - Yo, jpjccd, have a listen

BoatBanter.com (https://www.boatbanter.com/)

- General (https://www.boatbanter.com/general/)

- - Yo, jpjccd, have a listen (https://www.boatbanter.com/general/110843-yo-jpjccd-have-listen.html)

Yo, jpjccd, have a listen

John H. wrote:
On Thu, 15 Oct 2009 09:34:20 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

"KotP-A" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 14 Oct 2009 13:49:22 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

wrote in message
...
Consequently, if you have license to judge Limbaugh for an allegedly
overt prejudice, one he claims not to have, do you likewise have the
hubris to criticize or condemn me if I were to judge the likes of
Barney Frank?

Now then, how do I "feel" about Rush Limbaugh? Limbaugh, like Michael
Moore, is a propagandist. He resorts to informal fallacy. He is
puerile in his mockery of others. He is far from someone I would care
to emulate or revere. However, as much as I find Michael Moore to be
offensive, I don't begrudge him making his 'documentaries.' I have as
much license to rebut and refute his campaign of disinformation.
Similarly, I don't begrudge Limbaugh having an ownership stake in an
NFL team. I have license and the freedom to not watch a Ram's game,
should I choose.

Hopefully, I can tie all of this together to make it somewhat
sensible. What would Jesus do about Rush? He would forgive him.
Regardless of any comments by jps, that was well done!
These folks sport their royal double-standards in the melee of
political conversation, and when it's shown that it's nothing but tin
foil, they lose their emblematic moral dilemma post haste. They're
like dodge convertibles, if you know what I mean.

As weary as I was last night, though, when I wrote this, I'm surprised
I was able to articulate any cogent thought at all. :)

I haven't really been following this thread, but what they heck...
I think, from your subsequent paragraph, you should continue on that
track.

I am _not_ a football fan. I don't see the big deal with Rush buying a
team.
I believe the commissioner said that he (or was it other owners) would
block
it since owners are expected to not make inflamatory public statements.
Also, I'm not sure why Rush would want to buy a team... I heard someone
say
it's a perfect socialistic system, as the profits from TV are equally
divided. Perhaps Rush doesn't know this.. we wouldn't want his fat head to
explode! Ok, to give him some credit, he supposedly lost 85 lbs. recently.
lol

I think you don't know much about women.

Not your variety, that's for damn sure.

Princess little feather is one of a kind. God doesn't make the same
mistake twice.

Yo, jpjccd, have a listen

On Thu, 15 Oct 2009 09:34:20 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

I think you don't know much about women.

I suspect you don't either.

Yo, jpjccd, have a listen

On Thu, 15 Oct 2009 13:10:42 -0400, Jim wrote:

Princess little feather is one of a kind. God doesn't make the same
mistake twice.

Princess Little Feather as you say isn't a female.

Not by a long shot.

Yo, jpjccd, have a listen

On Thu, 15 Oct 2009 08:32:54 -0400, H the K
wrote:

On 10/15/09 8:31 AM, Tom Francis - SWSports wrote:
On Thu, 15 Oct 2009 08:05:16 -0400, KotP-A
wrote:

Post it. Or, is it another of the fabricated comments being bandied
about by foaming-at-the-mouth liberals. (Remember the famous jps
quote, "I'm not doing any foaming.")

Self-admitted - he did say it.

"But that comment was more of a, "Oh, no, jeez, don't let this happen
to the game." I don't want to see it. I have the game on a pedestal.
I have the people who play it on a pedestal. I don't want that to
change. So I was criticizing a mind-set that is destructive, and it
was not helpful. It was not racial. Bloods and Crips makes it look
racial, the way I chose to describe it. I could have perhaps chosen a
different term."

It's easy to back-peddle after you've said something damaging. I
don't doubt he says things for effect and, in certain circumstances,
it may have been the result of poorly chosen words.

However, Rush's stock in trade are the fabrications he spins to
support his racist following.

If the price of stoking these people to make all that money he
accumulates, don't expect the sane to forgive him when he tries to buy
into polite society.

It's really saying something that Rush's money isn't welcome among a
bunch of ego-maniacal NFL owners.

I'm sure it was similar for the rich slave traders who tried to buy
their way into polite society.

And I'm not foaming when I say, **** him in the ass with your dick.

I bet he'd love it.

Yo, jpjccd, have a listen

Tom Francis - SWSports wrote:
On Thu, 15 Oct 2009 13:10:42 -0400, Jim wrote:

Princess little feather is one of a kind. God doesn't make the same
mistake twice.

Princess Little Feather as you say isn't a female.

Not by a long shot.

You sly fox. What you got up your sleeve? Does it have something to do
with www.nomdeplumeonline.com