|
Yo, jpjccd, have a listen
On Wed, 14 Oct 2009 19:53:50 -0700 (PDT), Tim
wrote: On Oct 14, 8:15*pm, wrote: On Wed, 14 Oct 2009 18:21:28 -0500, Vic Smith wrote: On Wed, 14 Oct 2009 16:12:47 -0500, wrote: These folks sport their royal double-standards in the melee of political conversation, and when it's shown that it's nothing but tin foil, they lose their emblematic moral dilemma post haste. *They're like dodge convertibles, if you know what I mean. Always liked the looks of the Sebring, but not knowing anything about Chryco cars, never went after one. Had a '55 Belvidere stick (actually my ma's) and had a '74 Dart Swinger. *It dad that good straight 6 but the body rotted like tin. What do you mean by "they're like dodge convertibles?" If it's something dirty, just try to suggest your meaning with some delicacy. *I'm pretty sensitive. --Vic There's no double entendre intended, Vic. *It was more of a metaphor. The only convertible I've ever had in possession was a Triumph Spitfire, '71 if I remember correctly. *Looked something like this, but was orange with with racing strips; http://www.motaa.com/Images09/74%20t...0JIM%20&%20JUD... If that was the greatest ride in the world! *It was like riding right above the pavement. -- Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service * * * * * * *-------http://www.NewsDemon.com------ Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access i have a '64 Austin Healey Sprite, that needs carb work (whats new) and it's ready to go. Yes, it's like driving a boxed in skateboard. You had yours running already, Tim? I had the most fun with the Spitfire when I was a kid. Next would have to be the Fiat that my Dad owned. Behind that would be the '64 Volkswagon Sedan, the only car I ever wrecked. Is your Sprite a hobby car? -- Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service -------http://www.NewsDemon.com------ Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access |
Yo, jpjccd, have a listen
On Oct 14, 10:14*pm, wrote:
On Wed, 14 Oct 2009 19:53:50 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote: On Oct 14, 8:15*pm, wrote: On Wed, 14 Oct 2009 18:21:28 -0500, Vic Smith wrote: On Wed, 14 Oct 2009 16:12:47 -0500, wrote: These folks sport their royal double-standards in the melee of political conversation, and when it's shown that it's nothing but tin foil, they lose their emblematic moral dilemma post haste. *They're like dodge convertibles, if you know what I mean. Always liked the looks of the Sebring, but not knowing anything about Chryco cars, never went after one. Had a '55 Belvidere stick (actually my ma's) and had a '74 Dart Swinger. *It dad that good straight 6 but the body rotted like tin. What do you mean by "they're like dodge convertibles?" If it's something dirty, just try to suggest your meaning with some delicacy. *I'm pretty sensitive. --Vic There's no double entendre intended, Vic. *It was more of a metaphor.. The only convertible I've ever had in possession was a Triumph Spitfire, '71 if I remember correctly. *Looked something like this, but was orange with with racing strips; http://www.motaa.com/Images09/74%20t...0JIM%20&%20JUD.... If that was the greatest ride in the world! *It was like riding right above the pavement. -- Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service * * * * * * *-------http://www.NewsDemon.com------ Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access i have a '64 Austin Healey Sprite, that needs carb work (whats new) and it's ready to go. Yes, it's like driving a boxed in skateboard. You had yours running already, Tim? *I had the most fun with the Spitfire when I was a kid. *Next would have to be the Fiat that my Dad owned. *Behind that would be the '64 Volkswagon Sedan, the only car I ever wrecked. *Is your Sprite a hobby car? -- Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service * * * * * * *-------http://www.NewsDemon.com------ Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access It hasn't run in about 10 years. the carbs (SU) leaked like a sieve, so it got parked intill I could figure out a way to either bypass and mount on a Weber, or something else. needless to say, it now sits with flat tires and about an inch worth of dust on top of it. The car (when running) is drivable as is, but it needs restored. like some interior work etc. that little 4 cyl runs good and accelerates hard, for what it is. and it seems like nothing sounds quite like a British 4 banger. |
Yo, jpjccd, have a listen
On Oct 14, 10:26*pm, Tosk wrote:
In article a6c31cf6-d866-47f3-b7eb-8ff839db77e7 @l13g2000yqb.googlegroups.com, says... On Oct 14, 8:15*pm, wrote: On Wed, 14 Oct 2009 18:21:28 -0500, Vic Smith wrote: On Wed, 14 Oct 2009 16:12:47 -0500, wrote: These folks sport their royal double-standards in the melee of political conversation, and when it's shown that it's nothing but tin foil, they lose their emblematic moral dilemma post haste. *They're like dodge convertibles, if you know what I mean. Always liked the looks of the Sebring, but not knowing anything about Chryco cars, never went after one. Had a '55 Belvidere stick (actually my ma's) and had a '74 Dart Swinger. *It dad that good straight 6 but the body rotted like tin.. What do you mean by "they're like dodge convertibles?" If it's something dirty, just try to suggest your meaning with some delicacy. *I'm pretty sensitive. --Vic There's no double entendre intended, Vic. *It was more of a metaphor. |
Yo, jpjccd, have a listen
wrote in message
... On Wed, 14 Oct 2009 18:25:44 -0700, "nom=de=plume" wrote: wrote in message . .. On Wed, 14 Oct 2009 15:24:28 -0700, "nom=de=plume" wrote: snipped with insouciance There's a touch of irony in this debate in that the fight for years has been the effort to pierce the exclusive club mentality of certain organizations such as the Boy Scouts, and now there's a necessity of the exclusive club mentality of NFL ownership. If hypocrisy needed the examplar of an anecdote, this would do. I always liked Boy Scouts... they are so nice and helpful. The only thing that bothered me was that they would _never_ buy the Girl Scout cookies when I was a girl. They just walked by. lol I feel guilty now. I must have passed about 6 troops spread out over a couple of towns a couple of weeks ago. I even had one of the mother's flirt with me at a stand set up in front of Walmart. I just walked on by... Heathen! I know... (while hanging my head with my hands behind my back and carressing the ground with the toes of my foot...) As I said, I don't know much about (or care about) FB. The whole sport seems so contrived. Hockey I like. I don't understand it, but I like it. The funny part is when they're in the penalty box and they still manage to get in fights. LOL! I have been baffled before by women that love to watch pro hockey. What is it exactly that women find fascinating about hockey? They like to watch other people get hit on without effect? lol They have pick-up lines at hockey games? If that isn't a venue for the double entendre! I don't know... raw wildness and graceful power while being in and out of control on the ice. For all the cold in the arena, I'm never cold at a game. Do you attend Sharks games? Or the Stockton Thunder? Sharks... I might go with an old workmate at the end of the month. If I have some time, I might go to Stockton in Nov. Actually, I've met some really nice people at Sharks games. -- Nom=de=Plume |
Yo, jpjccd, have a listen
"Don White" wrote in message
... wrote in message ... On Wed, 14 Oct 2009 15:24:28 -0700, "nom=de=plume" wrote: snipped with insouciance There's a touch of irony in this debate in that the fight for years has been the effort to pierce the exclusive club mentality of certain organizations such as the Boy Scouts, and now there's a necessity of the exclusive club mentality of NFL ownership. If hypocrisy needed the examplar of an anecdote, this would do. I always liked Boy Scouts... they are so nice and helpful. The only thing that bothered me was that they would _never_ buy the Girl Scout cookies when I was a girl. They just walked by. lol I feel guilty now. I must have passed about 6 troops spread out over a couple of towns a couple of weeks ago. I even had one of the mother's flirt with me at a stand set up in front of Walmart. I just walked on by... As I said, I don't know much about (or care about) FB. The whole sport seems so contrived. Hockey I like. I don't understand it, but I like it. The funny part is when they're in the penalty box and they still manage to get in fights. LOL! I have been baffled before by women that love to watch pro hockey. What is it exactly that women find fascinating about hockey? -- Those manly Canadian players, of course! I don't like how they pronounce "about." lol -- Nom=de=Plume |
Yo, jpjccd, have a listen
On Oct 14, 11:49*pm, jps wrote:
On Wed, 14 Oct 2009 22:09:11 -0500, wrote: On Wed, 14 Oct 2009 20:02:34 -0700, jps wrote: On Wed, 14 Oct 2009 20:15:05 -0500, wrote: On Wed, 14 Oct 2009 18:21:28 -0500, Vic Smith wrote: On Wed, 14 Oct 2009 16:12:47 -0500, wrote: These folks sport their royal double-standards in the melee of political conversation, and when it's shown that it's nothing but tin foil, they lose their emblematic moral dilemma post haste. *They're like dodge convertibles, if you know what I mean. Always liked the looks of the Sebring, but not knowing anything about Chryco cars, never went after one. Had a '55 Belvidere stick (actually my ma's) and had a '74 Dart Swinger. *It dad that good straight 6 but the body rotted like tin. What do you mean by "they're like dodge convertibles?" If it's something dirty, just try to suggest your meaning with some delicacy. *I'm pretty sensitive. --Vic There's no double entendre intended, Vic. *It was more of a metaphor.. The only convertible I've ever had in possession was a Triumph Spitfire, '71 if I remember correctly. *Looked something like this, but was orange with with racing strips; http://www.motaa.com/Images09/74%20t...0JIM%20&%20JUD.... If that was the greatest ride in the world! *It was like riding right above the pavement. You sporting a Hummer these days? Ford F150. Standard Republican issue. Still attempting to save face, little one? Especially after having your arse handed to you in such royal form? By the way, how is your standard issue Peugeot holding in there? |
Yo, jpjccd, have a listen
On Wed, 14 Oct 2009 21:49:23 -0700, jps wrote:
On Wed, 14 Oct 2009 22:09:11 -0500, wrote: On Wed, 14 Oct 2009 20:02:34 -0700, jps wrote: On Wed, 14 Oct 2009 20:15:05 -0500, wrote: On Wed, 14 Oct 2009 18:21:28 -0500, Vic Smith wrote: On Wed, 14 Oct 2009 16:12:47 -0500, wrote: These folks sport their royal double-standards in the melee of political conversation, and when it's shown that it's nothing but tin foil, they lose their emblematic moral dilemma post haste. They're like dodge convertibles, if you know what I mean. Always liked the looks of the Sebring, but not knowing anything about Chryco cars, never went after one. Had a '55 Belvidere stick (actually my ma's) and had a '74 Dart Swinger. It dad that good straight 6 but the body rotted like tin. What do you mean by "they're like dodge convertibles?" If it's something dirty, just try to suggest your meaning with some delicacy. I'm pretty sensitive. --Vic There's no double entendre intended, Vic. It was more of a metaphor. The only convertible I've ever had in possession was a Triumph Spitfire, '71 if I remember correctly. Looked something like this, but was orange with with racing strips; http://www.motaa.com/Images09/74%20t...LER %20N9.jpg If that was the greatest ride in the world! It was like riding right above the pavement. You sporting a Hummer these days? Ford F150. Standard Republican issue. And the standard Democrat issue is the SUV - Expedition, Hummer 2, Suburban... |
Yo, jpjccd, have a listen
"nom=de=plume" wrote in message ... "Don White" wrote in message ... wrote in message ... On Wed, 14 Oct 2009 15:24:28 -0700, "nom=de=plume" wrote: snipped with insouciance There's a touch of irony in this debate in that the fight for years has been the effort to pierce the exclusive club mentality of certain organizations such as the Boy Scouts, and now there's a necessity of the exclusive club mentality of NFL ownership. If hypocrisy needed the examplar of an anecdote, this would do. I always liked Boy Scouts... they are so nice and helpful. The only thing that bothered me was that they would _never_ buy the Girl Scout cookies when I was a girl. They just walked by. lol I feel guilty now. I must have passed about 6 troops spread out over a couple of towns a couple of weeks ago. I even had one of the mother's flirt with me at a stand set up in front of Walmart. I just walked on by... As I said, I don't know much about (or care about) FB. The whole sport seems so contrived. Hockey I like. I don't understand it, but I like it. The funny part is when they're in the penalty box and they still manage to get in fights. LOL! I have been baffled before by women that love to watch pro hockey. What is it exactly that women find fascinating about hockey? -- Those manly Canadian players, of course! I don't like how they pronounce "about." lol -- Nom=de=Plume Probably depends on which part of the country...or if French is is the equation. We think we talk normal here.....probably closer to your mid-western people than your funny talkin' southerners, westerners or even Boston citizens. http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/about We might sound more like 'a-bout' rather than 'uh-bout' |
Yo, jpjccd, have a listen
On Wed, 14 Oct 2009 13:49:22 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote: wrote in message .. . Consequently, if you have license to judge Limbaugh for an allegedly overt prejudice, one he claims not to have, do you likewise have the hubris to criticize or condemn me if I were to judge the likes of Barney Frank? Now then, how do I "feel" about Rush Limbaugh? Limbaugh, like Michael Moore, is a propagandist. He resorts to informal fallacy. He is puerile in his mockery of others. He is far from someone I would care to emulate or revere. However, as much as I find Michael Moore to be offensive, I don't begrudge him making his 'documentaries.' I have as much license to rebut and refute his campaign of disinformation. Similarly, I don't begrudge Limbaugh having an ownership stake in an NFL team. I have license and the freedom to not watch a Ram's game, should I choose. Hopefully, I can tie all of this together to make it somewhat sensible. What would Jesus do about Rush? He would forgive him. Regardless of any comments by jps, that was well done! These folks sport their royal double-standards in the melee of political conversation, and when it's shown that it's nothing but tin foil, they lose their emblematic moral dilemma post haste. They're like dodge convertibles, if you know what I mean. As weary as I was last night, though, when I wrote this, I'm surprised I was able to articulate any cogent thought at all. :) I haven't really been following this thread, but what they heck... I think, from your subsequent paragraph, you should continue on that track. I am _not_ a football fan. I don't see the big deal with Rush buying a team. I believe the commissioner said that he (or was it other owners) would block it since owners are expected to not make inflamatory public statements. Also, I'm not sure why Rush would want to buy a team... I heard someone say it's a perfect socialistic system, as the profits from TV are equally divided. Perhaps Rush doesn't know this.. we wouldn't want his fat head to explode! Ok, to give him some credit, he supposedly lost 85 lbs. recently. lol |
Yo, jpjccd, have a listen
On Wed, 14 Oct 2009 16:00:31 -0700, jps wrote:
On Wed, 14 Oct 2009 15:12:41 -0500, wrote: These folks sport their royal double-standards in the melee of political conversation, and when it's shown that it's nothing but tin foil, they lose their emblematic moral dilemma post haste. They're like dodge convertibles, if you know what I mean. As weary as I was last night, though, when I wrote this, I'm surprised I was able to articulate any cogent thought at all. :) Are you certain you did? Looks like another entry from the Ponderosa. Double standard nothing. I'm all for free speech until the free speech details how we should curtail the civil rights or equal protection of all. That's why Nazi's have a difficult time getting permission to parade. Rush is a step backwards in the evolution of civil society in America. He's welcome to join any white-only club he desires with my blessing. When it comes to participating in a sport that creates opportunity for and can highlight african american men in a positive way, he's a completely inappropriate partner. You need only to have heard his comment about the NFL being crips and bloods without weapons. Post it. Or, is it another of the fabricated comments being bandied about by foaming-at-the-mouth liberals. (Remember the famous jps quote, "I'm not doing any foaming.") **** him in his ass with your dick. And thanks for offering. ("I'm not doing any foaming.") What a laugh! |
Yo, jpjccd, have a listen
On Thu, 15 Oct 2009 08:05:16 -0400, KotP-A
wrote: Post it. Or, is it another of the fabricated comments being bandied about by foaming-at-the-mouth liberals. (Remember the famous jps quote, "I'm not doing any foaming.") Self-admitted - he did say it. "But that comment was more of a, "Oh, no, jeez, don't let this happen to the game." I don't want to see it. I have the game on a pedestal. I have the people who play it on a pedestal. I don't want that to change. So I was criticizing a mind-set that is destructive, and it was not helpful. It was not racial. Bloods and Crips makes it look racial, the way I chose to describe it. I could have perhaps chosen a different term." Transcript he http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/home/dai...113.guest.html There were a lot of bad quotes attributed to Limbaugh - all fabricated with no attribution. But he did say that and admitted it. Having said that, I honestly have never listened to Limbaugh - maybe once or twice when there wasn't anything else on the car radio, but then I bought satellite. :) I also find it funny that jps used a reference to Jim Irsay who wouldn't vote for Limbaugh. This is the guy who moved the Colts from Baltimore to Indianapolis in the middle of the night without telling anybody about it and has attributed to him "I don't like Jews". Pot- Kettle - Black. |
Yo, jpjccd, have a listen
On 10/15/09 8:31 AM, Tom Francis - SWSports wrote:
On Thu, 15 Oct 2009 08:05:16 -0400, KotP-A wrote: Post it. Or, is it another of the fabricated comments being bandied about by foaming-at-the-mouth liberals. (Remember the famous jps quote, "I'm not doing any foaming.") Self-admitted - he did say it. "But that comment was more of a, "Oh, no, jeez, don't let this happen to the game." I don't want to see it. I have the game on a pedestal. I have the people who play it on a pedestal. I don't want that to change. So I was criticizing a mind-set that is destructive, and it was not helpful. It was not racial. Bloods and Crips makes it look racial, the way I chose to describe it. I could have perhaps chosen a different term." Transcript he http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/home/dai...113.guest.html There were a lot of bad quotes attributed to Limbaugh - all fabricated with no attribution. But he did say that and admitted it. Having said that, I honestly have never listened to Limbaugh - maybe once or twice when there wasn't anything else on the car radio, but then I bought satellite. :) I also find it funny that jps used a reference to Jim Irsay who wouldn't vote for Limbaugh. This is the guy who moved the Colts from Baltimore to Indianapolis in the middle of the night without telling anybody about it and has attributed to him "I don't like Jews". Pot- Kettle - Black. SW Tom: Loves Limbaugh -- http://tinyurl.com/ykaa4k7 |
Yo, jpjccd, have a listen
On Thu, 15 Oct 2009 08:31:27 -0400, Tom Francis - SWSports wrote:
I also find it funny that jps used a reference to Jim Irsay who wouldn't vote for Limbaugh. This is the guy who moved the Colts from Baltimore to Indianapolis in the middle of the night without telling anybody about it and has attributed to him "I don't like Jews". That would be his father, Robert Irsay, who happened to be Jewish. http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7...452329,00.html |
Yo, jpjccd, have a listen
On Thu, 15 Oct 2009 07:44:18 -0500, thunder
wrote: On Thu, 15 Oct 2009 08:31:27 -0400, Tom Francis - SWSports wrote: I also find it funny that jps used a reference to Jim Irsay who wouldn't vote for Limbaugh. This is the guy who moved the Colts from Baltimore to Indianapolis in the middle of the night without telling anybody about it and has attributed to him "I don't like Jews". That would be his father, Robert Irsay, who happened to be Jewish. http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7...452329,00.html I could care less - he has it attributed to him and he's still a scum bag. |
Yo, jpjccd, have a listen
On 10/15/09 8:51 AM, Tom Francis - SWSports wrote:
I could care less - he has it attributed to him and he's still a scum bag. Damn...we agree...Limbaugh is a scumbag. Who would have thunk it? -- http://tinyurl.com/ykaa4k7 |
Yo, jpjccd, have a listen
On Thu, 15 Oct 2009 08:31:27 -0400, Tom Francis - SWSports
wrote: On Thu, 15 Oct 2009 08:05:16 -0400, KotP-A wrote: Post it. Or, is it another of the fabricated comments being bandied about by foaming-at-the-mouth liberals. (Remember the famous jps quote, "I'm not doing any foaming.") Self-admitted - he did say it. "But that comment was more of a, "Oh, no, jeez, don't let this happen to the game." I don't want to see it. I have the game on a pedestal. I have the people who play it on a pedestal. I don't want that to change. So I was criticizing a mind-set that is destructive, and it was not helpful. It was not racial. Bloods and Crips makes it look racial, the way I chose to describe it. I could have perhaps chosen a different term." Transcript he http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/home/dai...113.guest.html There were a lot of bad quotes attributed to Limbaugh - all fabricated with no attribution. But he did say that and admitted it. Having said that, I honestly have never listened to Limbaugh - maybe once or twice when there wasn't anything else on the car radio, but then I bought satellite. :) I also find it funny that jps used a reference to Jim Irsay who wouldn't vote for Limbaugh. This is the guy who moved the Colts from Baltimore to Indianapolis in the middle of the night without telling anybody about it and has attributed to him "I don't like Jews". Pot- Kettle - Black. Thanks for the link. It's one of the few 'quotes' that are real. |
Yo, jpjccd, have a listen
"Don White" wrote in message
... "nom=de=plume" wrote in message ... "Don White" wrote in message ... wrote in message ... On Wed, 14 Oct 2009 15:24:28 -0700, "nom=de=plume" wrote: snipped with insouciance There's a touch of irony in this debate in that the fight for years has been the effort to pierce the exclusive club mentality of certain organizations such as the Boy Scouts, and now there's a necessity of the exclusive club mentality of NFL ownership. If hypocrisy needed the examplar of an anecdote, this would do. I always liked Boy Scouts... they are so nice and helpful. The only thing that bothered me was that they would _never_ buy the Girl Scout cookies when I was a girl. They just walked by. lol I feel guilty now. I must have passed about 6 troops spread out over a couple of towns a couple of weeks ago. I even had one of the mother's flirt with me at a stand set up in front of Walmart. I just walked on by... As I said, I don't know much about (or care about) FB. The whole sport seems so contrived. Hockey I like. I don't understand it, but I like it. The funny part is when they're in the penalty box and they still manage to get in fights. LOL! I have been baffled before by women that love to watch pro hockey. What is it exactly that women find fascinating about hockey? -- Those manly Canadian players, of course! I don't like how they pronounce "about." lol -- Nom=de=Plume Probably depends on which part of the country...or if French is is the equation. We think we talk normal here.....probably closer to your mid-western people than your funny talkin' southerners, westerners or even Boston citizens. http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/about We might sound more like 'a-bout' rather than 'uh-bout' Just kidding... I do like Canadians. I even dated one once. He was *not* from Quebec. lol -- Nom=de=Plume |
Yo, jpjccd, have a listen
"KotP-A" wrote in message
... On Wed, 14 Oct 2009 13:49:22 -0700, "nom=de=plume" wrote: wrote in message . .. Consequently, if you have license to judge Limbaugh for an allegedly overt prejudice, one he claims not to have, do you likewise have the hubris to criticize or condemn me if I were to judge the likes of Barney Frank? Now then, how do I "feel" about Rush Limbaugh? Limbaugh, like Michael Moore, is a propagandist. He resorts to informal fallacy. He is puerile in his mockery of others. He is far from someone I would care to emulate or revere. However, as much as I find Michael Moore to be offensive, I don't begrudge him making his 'documentaries.' I have as much license to rebut and refute his campaign of disinformation. Similarly, I don't begrudge Limbaugh having an ownership stake in an NFL team. I have license and the freedom to not watch a Ram's game, should I choose. Hopefully, I can tie all of this together to make it somewhat sensible. What would Jesus do about Rush? He would forgive him. Regardless of any comments by jps, that was well done! These folks sport their royal double-standards in the melee of political conversation, and when it's shown that it's nothing but tin foil, they lose their emblematic moral dilemma post haste. They're like dodge convertibles, if you know what I mean. As weary as I was last night, though, when I wrote this, I'm surprised I was able to articulate any cogent thought at all. :) I haven't really been following this thread, but what they heck... I think, from your subsequent paragraph, you should continue on that track. I am _not_ a football fan. I don't see the big deal with Rush buying a team. I believe the commissioner said that he (or was it other owners) would block it since owners are expected to not make inflamatory public statements. Also, I'm not sure why Rush would want to buy a team... I heard someone say it's a perfect socialistic system, as the profits from TV are equally divided. Perhaps Rush doesn't know this.. we wouldn't want his fat head to explode! Ok, to give him some credit, he supposedly lost 85 lbs. recently. lol I think you don't know much about women. -- Nom=de=Plume |
Yo, jpjccd, have a listen
On Thu, 15 Oct 2009 09:34:20 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote: "KotP-A" wrote in message .. . On Wed, 14 Oct 2009 13:49:22 -0700, "nom=de=plume" wrote: wrote in message ... Consequently, if you have license to judge Limbaugh for an allegedly overt prejudice, one he claims not to have, do you likewise have the hubris to criticize or condemn me if I were to judge the likes of Barney Frank? Now then, how do I "feel" about Rush Limbaugh? Limbaugh, like Michael Moore, is a propagandist. He resorts to informal fallacy. He is puerile in his mockery of others. He is far from someone I would care to emulate or revere. However, as much as I find Michael Moore to be offensive, I don't begrudge him making his 'documentaries.' I have as much license to rebut and refute his campaign of disinformation. Similarly, I don't begrudge Limbaugh having an ownership stake in an NFL team. I have license and the freedom to not watch a Ram's game, should I choose. Hopefully, I can tie all of this together to make it somewhat sensible. What would Jesus do about Rush? He would forgive him. Regardless of any comments by jps, that was well done! These folks sport their royal double-standards in the melee of political conversation, and when it's shown that it's nothing but tin foil, they lose their emblematic moral dilemma post haste. They're like dodge convertibles, if you know what I mean. As weary as I was last night, though, when I wrote this, I'm surprised I was able to articulate any cogent thought at all. :) I haven't really been following this thread, but what they heck... I think, from your subsequent paragraph, you should continue on that track. I am _not_ a football fan. I don't see the big deal with Rush buying a team. I believe the commissioner said that he (or was it other owners) would block it since owners are expected to not make inflamatory public statements. Also, I'm not sure why Rush would want to buy a team... I heard someone say it's a perfect socialistic system, as the profits from TV are equally divided. Perhaps Rush doesn't know this.. we wouldn't want his fat head to explode! Ok, to give him some credit, he supposedly lost 85 lbs. recently. lol I think you don't know much about women. Not your variety, that's for damn sure. |
Yo, jpjccd, have a listen
John H. wrote:
On Thu, 15 Oct 2009 09:34:20 -0700, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "KotP-A" wrote in message ... On Wed, 14 Oct 2009 13:49:22 -0700, "nom=de=plume" wrote: wrote in message ... Consequently, if you have license to judge Limbaugh for an allegedly overt prejudice, one he claims not to have, do you likewise have the hubris to criticize or condemn me if I were to judge the likes of Barney Frank? Now then, how do I "feel" about Rush Limbaugh? Limbaugh, like Michael Moore, is a propagandist. He resorts to informal fallacy. He is puerile in his mockery of others. He is far from someone I would care to emulate or revere. However, as much as I find Michael Moore to be offensive, I don't begrudge him making his 'documentaries.' I have as much license to rebut and refute his campaign of disinformation. Similarly, I don't begrudge Limbaugh having an ownership stake in an NFL team. I have license and the freedom to not watch a Ram's game, should I choose. Hopefully, I can tie all of this together to make it somewhat sensible. What would Jesus do about Rush? He would forgive him. Regardless of any comments by jps, that was well done! These folks sport their royal double-standards in the melee of political conversation, and when it's shown that it's nothing but tin foil, they lose their emblematic moral dilemma post haste. They're like dodge convertibles, if you know what I mean. As weary as I was last night, though, when I wrote this, I'm surprised I was able to articulate any cogent thought at all. :) I haven't really been following this thread, but what they heck... I think, from your subsequent paragraph, you should continue on that track. I am _not_ a football fan. I don't see the big deal with Rush buying a team. I believe the commissioner said that he (or was it other owners) would block it since owners are expected to not make inflamatory public statements. Also, I'm not sure why Rush would want to buy a team... I heard someone say it's a perfect socialistic system, as the profits from TV are equally divided. Perhaps Rush doesn't know this.. we wouldn't want his fat head to explode! Ok, to give him some credit, he supposedly lost 85 lbs. recently. lol I think you don't know much about women. Not your variety, that's for damn sure. Princess little feather is one of a kind. God doesn't make the same mistake twice. |
Yo, jpjccd, have a listen
On Thu, 15 Oct 2009 06:15:19 -0400, Tom Francis - SWSports
wrote: On Wed, 14 Oct 2009 21:49:23 -0700, jps wrote: On Wed, 14 Oct 2009 22:09:11 -0500, wrote: On Wed, 14 Oct 2009 20:02:34 -0700, jps wrote: On Wed, 14 Oct 2009 20:15:05 -0500, wrote: On Wed, 14 Oct 2009 18:21:28 -0500, Vic Smith wrote: On Wed, 14 Oct 2009 16:12:47 -0500, wrote: These folks sport their royal double-standards in the melee of political conversation, and when it's shown that it's nothing but tin foil, they lose their emblematic moral dilemma post haste. They're like dodge convertibles, if you know what I mean. Always liked the looks of the Sebring, but not knowing anything about Chryco cars, never went after one. Had a '55 Belvidere stick (actually my ma's) and had a '74 Dart Swinger. It dad that good straight 6 but the body rotted like tin. What do you mean by "they're like dodge convertibles?" If it's something dirty, just try to suggest your meaning with some delicacy. I'm pretty sensitive. --Vic There's no double entendre intended, Vic. It was more of a metaphor. The only convertible I've ever had in possession was a Triumph Spitfire, '71 if I remember correctly. Looked something like this, but was orange with with racing strips; http://www.motaa.com/Images09/74%20t...LER %20N9.jpg If that was the greatest ride in the world! It was like riding right above the pavement. You sporting a Hummer these days? Ford F150. Standard Republican issue. And the standard Democrat issue is the SUV - Expedition, Hummer 2, Suburban... Not a single person I know drives any of those vehicles. They're gas pigs. The NW isn't into ostentatious or displays. At least not until you get out of town where the idiots live side-by-side with the educated. I don't know a single Democrat who'd be caught dead in a Hummer. |
Yo, jpjccd, have a listen
On Thu, 15 Oct 2009 09:34:20 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote: I think you don't know much about women. I suspect you don't either. |
Yo, jpjccd, have a listen
On Thu, 15 Oct 2009 13:10:42 -0400, Jim wrote:
Princess little feather is one of a kind. God doesn't make the same mistake twice. Princess Little Feather as you say isn't a female. Not by a long shot. |
Yo, jpjccd, have a listen
On Thu, 15 Oct 2009 08:05:16 -0400, KotP-A
wrote: On Wed, 14 Oct 2009 16:00:31 -0700, jps wrote: On Wed, 14 Oct 2009 15:12:41 -0500, wrote: These folks sport their royal double-standards in the melee of political conversation, and when it's shown that it's nothing but tin foil, they lose their emblematic moral dilemma post haste. They're like dodge convertibles, if you know what I mean. As weary as I was last night, though, when I wrote this, I'm surprised I was able to articulate any cogent thought at all. :) Are you certain you did? Looks like another entry from the Ponderosa. Double standard nothing. I'm all for free speech until the free speech details how we should curtail the civil rights or equal protection of all. That's why Nazi's have a difficult time getting permission to parade. Rush is a step backwards in the evolution of civil society in America. He's welcome to join any white-only club he desires with my blessing. When it comes to participating in a sport that creates opportunity for and can highlight african american men in a positive way, he's a completely inappropriate partner. You need only to have heard his comment about the NFL being crips and bloods without weapons. Post it. Or, is it another of the fabricated comments being bandied about by foaming-at-the-mouth liberals. (Remember the famous jps quote, "I'm not doing any foaming.") **** him in his ass with your dick. And thanks for offering. ("I'm not doing any foaming.") What a laugh! What's fabricated is your loyalty to this country. The likes of you would turn it into China and probably will. You defending Limbaugh is a joke. I'd offer to **** him with your dick but I'm absolutely certain it hasn't worked in years. |
Yo, jpjccd, have a listen
|
Yo, jpjccd, have a listen
|
Yo, jpjccd, have a listen
On Thu, 15 Oct 2009 08:32:54 -0400, H the K
wrote: On 10/15/09 8:31 AM, Tom Francis - SWSports wrote: On Thu, 15 Oct 2009 08:05:16 -0400, KotP-A wrote: Post it. Or, is it another of the fabricated comments being bandied about by foaming-at-the-mouth liberals. (Remember the famous jps quote, "I'm not doing any foaming.") Self-admitted - he did say it. "But that comment was more of a, "Oh, no, jeez, don't let this happen to the game." I don't want to see it. I have the game on a pedestal. I have the people who play it on a pedestal. I don't want that to change. So I was criticizing a mind-set that is destructive, and it was not helpful. It was not racial. Bloods and Crips makes it look racial, the way I chose to describe it. I could have perhaps chosen a different term." It's easy to back-peddle after you've said something damaging. I don't doubt he says things for effect and, in certain circumstances, it may have been the result of poorly chosen words. However, Rush's stock in trade are the fabrications he spins to support his racist following. If the price of stoking these people to make all that money he accumulates, don't expect the sane to forgive him when he tries to buy into polite society. It's really saying something that Rush's money isn't welcome among a bunch of ego-maniacal NFL owners. I'm sure it was similar for the rich slave traders who tried to buy their way into polite society. And I'm not foaming when I say, **** him in the ass with your dick. I bet he'd love it. |
Yo, jpjccd, have a listen
On 10/15/09 3:59 PM, Tosk wrote:
In , says... On Thu, 15 Oct 2009 09:34:20 -0700, "nom=de=plume" wrote: I think you don't know much about women. I suspect you don't either. Only thing Harry knows about women is they are to be degraded and attacked. He also thinks children are just silent little sex toys... After all, the guy wouldn't dare attack a man, he knows he would get his lights punched out... Scott Ingersoll, our our Little Caesar, emphasis on little. -- http://tinyurl.com/ykaa4k7 |
Yo, jpjccd, have a listen
Tom Francis - SWSports wrote:
On Thu, 15 Oct 2009 13:10:42 -0400, Jim wrote: Princess little feather is one of a kind. God doesn't make the same mistake twice. Princess Little Feather as you say isn't a female. Not by a long shot. You sly fox. What you got up your sleeve? Does it have something to do with www.nomdeplumeonline.com |
Yo, jpjccd, have a listen
anybody about it and has attributed to him "I don't like Jews". My quote of Rush is questioned about crips and bloods. Where is your cite of this quote? If true, I think it's hilarious that Rush would be discriminated against by another who discriminates based on religion. |
Yo, jpjccd, have a listen
Tosk wrote:
In article , says... On Thu, 15 Oct 2009 13:10:42 -0400, Jim wrote: Princess little feather is one of a kind. God doesn't make the same mistake twice. Princess Little Feather as you say isn't a female. Not by a long shot. GUYS, IT'S HARRY!!!! DON'T YOU GET IT??? No. I don't think so unless he has insomnia. |
Yo, jpjccd, have a listen
On Thu, 15 Oct 2009 09:34:20 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote: I think you don't know much about women. Or anything else. |
Yo, jpjccd, have a listen
On Thu, 15 Oct 2009 15:56:56 -0400, Tom Francis - SWSports
wrote: On Thu, 15 Oct 2009 13:10:42 -0400, Jim wrote: Princess little feather is one of a kind. God doesn't make the same mistake twice. Princess Little Feather as you say isn't a female. Not by a long shot. Yeahbut, Prince Little Feather sounds kinda stupid and dorky. |
Yo, jpjccd, have a listen
On Thu, 15 Oct 2009 12:58:45 -0700, jps wrote:
On Thu, 15 Oct 2009 08:05:16 -0400, KotP-A wrote: On Wed, 14 Oct 2009 16:00:31 -0700, jps wrote: On Wed, 14 Oct 2009 15:12:41 -0500, wrote: These folks sport their royal double-standards in the melee of political conversation, and when it's shown that it's nothing but tin foil, they lose their emblematic moral dilemma post haste. They're like dodge convertibles, if you know what I mean. As weary as I was last night, though, when I wrote this, I'm surprised I was able to articulate any cogent thought at all. :) Are you certain you did? Looks like another entry from the Ponderosa. Double standard nothing. I'm all for free speech until the free speech details how we should curtail the civil rights or equal protection of all. That's why Nazi's have a difficult time getting permission to parade. Rush is a step backwards in the evolution of civil society in America. He's welcome to join any white-only club he desires with my blessing. When it comes to participating in a sport that creates opportunity for and can highlight african american men in a positive way, he's a completely inappropriate partner. You need only to have heard his comment about the NFL being crips and bloods without weapons. Post it. Or, is it another of the fabricated comments being bandied about by foaming-at-the-mouth liberals. (Remember the famous jps quote, "I'm not doing any foaming.") **** him in his ass with your dick. And thanks for offering. ("I'm not doing any foaming.") What a laugh! What's fabricated is your loyalty to this country. The likes of you would turn it into China and probably will. You defending Limbaugh is a joke. I'd offer to **** him with your dick but I'm absolutely certain it hasn't worked in years. No, you're not foaming! ~~laughter~~ |
Yo, jpjccd, have a listen
"Tom Francis - SWSports" wrote in
message ... On Thu, 15 Oct 2009 13:10:42 -0400, Jim wrote: Princess little feather is one of a kind. God doesn't make the same mistake twice. Princess Little Feather as you say isn't a female. Not by a long shot. Sounds like you have some self-identity issues.. lol -- Nom=de=Plume |
Yo, jpjccd, have a listen
On Thu, 15 Oct 2009 13:06:42 -0700, jps wrote:
On Thu, 15 Oct 2009 08:32:54 -0400, H the K wrote: On 10/15/09 8:31 AM, Tom Francis - SWSports wrote: On Thu, 15 Oct 2009 08:05:16 -0400, KotP-A wrote: Post it. Or, is it another of the fabricated comments being bandied about by foaming-at-the-mouth liberals. (Remember the famous jps quote, "I'm not doing any foaming.") Self-admitted - he did say it. "But that comment was more of a, "Oh, no, jeez, don't let this happen to the game." I don't want to see it. I have the game on a pedestal. I have the people who play it on a pedestal. I don't want that to change. So I was criticizing a mind-set that is destructive, and it was not helpful. It was not racial. Bloods and Crips makes it look racial, the way I chose to describe it. I could have perhaps chosen a different term." It's easy to back-peddle after you've said something damaging. I don't doubt he says things for effect and, in certain circumstances, it may have been the result of poorly chosen words. However, Rush's stock in trade are the fabrications he spins to support his racist following. If the price of stoking these people to make all that money he accumulates, don't expect the sane to forgive him when he tries to buy into polite society. It's really saying something that Rush's money isn't welcome among a bunch of ego-maniacal NFL owners. I'm sure it was similar for the rich slave traders who tried to buy their way into polite society. And I'm not foaming when I say, **** him in the ass with your dick. I bet he'd love it. Famous jps quote, "I'm not foaming." ~~snerk~~ |
Yo, jpjccd, have a listen
"John H." wrote in message
... On Thu, 15 Oct 2009 15:56:56 -0400, Tom Francis - SWSports wrote: On Thu, 15 Oct 2009 13:10:42 -0400, Jim wrote: Princess little feather is one of a kind. God doesn't make the same mistake twice. Princess Little Feather as you say isn't a female. Not by a long shot. Yeahbut, Prince Little Feather sounds kinda stupid and dorky. Perhaps, but there's a difference between the two of us. I may sound kinda stupid, but you.... lol -- Nom=de=Plume |
Yo, jpjccd, have a listen
"Tom Francis - SWSports" wrote in
message ... On Thu, 15 Oct 2009 09:34:20 -0700, "nom=de=plume" wrote: I think you don't know much about women. I suspect you don't either. Suspicion is could be one of the the stages of paranoia... lol -- Nom=de=Plume |
Yo, jpjccd, have a listen
"Tosk" wrote in message
... In article , says... On Thu, 15 Oct 2009 09:34:20 -0700, "nom=de=plume" wrote: I think you don't know much about women. I suspect you don't either. Only thing Harry knows about women is they are to be degraded and attacked. He also thinks children are just silent little sex toys... After all, the guy wouldn't dare attack a man, he knows he would get his lights punched out... You just scream at them from behind your computer... manly. -- Nom=de=Plume |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:54 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com