wf3h wrote:
On Oct 12, 11:40 am, Jim wrote:
wf3h wrote:
On Oct 12, 10:55 am, Canuck57 wrote:
His achievement was $1.3 trillion debt-corruption-spend in only 8
months. Guinness Book of records material perhaps?-
what's really a record is how quickly george bush and his rich free
market friends stole my 401K
So sorry for your loss. Too bad you don't have at least some control of
your 401. You might look at fixing that instead of blaming the boogyman.

i did have control. i did what the right wing said to do: trust the
rich.

my corrective action is not to trust the rich anymore...you're too
stupid to learn that

Instead of envy, distrust and hate of the rich, learn to think like
them. They have people paid big bucks to keep them out of financial
trouble, certainly more than you or I can afford.

When government said nothing to worry about re-debt markets in 2007 and
again in 2008, this was your/our first red flag.

The second one was interest rates versus deposit yeild rates inverting.
A huge red flag as it has been a reliable indicator of recession for
over 100 years.

You can sit on your arse and bitch about the rich, but there are good
reasons why they have money and you do not. And the reason is simple,
they do their research and humbly and rationally know the markets on how
they really operate. They don't get sucked into BO feel good talk, it
is about rationale and the numbers. Nothing else.

On Oct 12, 12:35*pm, Canuck57 wrote:
wf3h wrote:


my corrective action is not to trust the rich anymore...you're too
stupid to learn that

Instead of envy, distrust and hate of the rich, learn to think like
them. *They have people paid big bucks to keep them out of financial
trouble, certainly more than you or I can afford.

how does one think like a thief who bribes politicians when one has no
money to bribe politicians?


When government said nothing to worry about re-debt markets in 2007 and
again in 2008, this was your/our first red flag.

me and ever nobel prize winning economist on the planet.

You can sit on your arse and bitch about the rich, but there are good
reasons why they have money and you do not.

yeah. they inherit it and bribe politicians to game the system so we
have NO choice BUT to invest with them.

so the REAL answer is to change the system instead of doing like YOU
recommend which is to pat them on the back for being such good thieves

*And the reason is simple,
they do their research and humbly and rationally know the markets on how
they really operate.

bull****. pure bull****. if they did so, they wouldnt have to come to
me and ask me to bail them out after they stole my money

what the hell do you smoke?

wf3h wrote:
On Oct 12, 12:35 pm, Canuck57 wrote:
wf3h wrote:


my corrective action is not to trust the rich anymore...you're too
stupid to learn that
Instead of envy, distrust and hate of the rich, learn to think like
them. They have people paid big bucks to keep them out of financial
trouble, certainly more than you or I can afford.

how does one think like a thief who bribes politicians when one has no
money to bribe politicians?

Don't mistake real capitalist-conservatives with corrupted types. Big
difference. You can be a leftist-socialist and corrupt, in fact that is
where the worst of it is.

Because the left promises a lot, delivers little but to the coffers of
the government.

Corruption from any sector, be it business or government robs from us all.

When government said nothing to worry about re-debt markets in 2007 and
again in 2008, this was your/our first red flag.

me and ever nobel prize winning economist on the planet.
You can sit on your arse and bitch about the rich, but there are good
reasons why they have money and you do not.

yeah. they inherit it and bribe politicians to game the system so we
have NO choice BUT to invest with them.

I don't bribe politicians, but anticipating the non-causal relationship
between the CEO's of GM, Chrysler, Ceberus, Carlyle etc. sure rewarded
me, I bough Ford at $2.50 or less and sold out at $6.50 or more. Nice
ROI in betting on GMs futures would unfold the way they did. Because I
understood the government would bailout GM for it's politicial
connections are strong. Which left Ford in a better position.

I subscribe to the saying that investing is like chess. A game of
strategy, logic and emotions best checked into the toilet. Which
included liberal media BS.

Of course we have to invest! If you let $100 sit in a bank account then
you loose money. Money, cash, it's a deprediating asset. It's value is
in liquidity to trade, nothing more.


so the REAL answer is to change the system instead of doing like YOU
recommend which is to pat them on the back for being such good thieves

Pat who? I never suggested patting anyone. If it were myself as
president back in Feb/Mar in talking with GM's Wagoner, I would say to
Wagoner "I think you should declare bankruptcy now as if you go on with
this rouse the SEC will pay you an Enron like visit."

But I was banking on Wagoner from Harvard having pull and he wanted his
$20M retirement. See, if GM went down, Ford would have supply problems.
But if GM took the PR hit on bankruptcy, and made solvent, Ford would
do well.

And the reason is simple,
they do their research and humbly and rationally know the markets on how
they really operate.

bull****. pure bull****. if they did so, they wouldnt have to come to
me and ask me to bail them out after they stole my money

Only the corrupt ones are. And your politicians are too corrupt
themselves to do the right thing.

what the hell do you smoke?

Nothing. Don't even drink, ok, one beer in the last year.

On Mon, 12 Oct 2009 11:25:04 -0700 (PDT), wf3h
wrote:

On Oct 12, 12:35*pm, Canuck57 wrote:
wf3h wrote:


my corrective action is not to trust the rich anymore...you're too
stupid to learn that

Instead of envy, distrust and hate of the rich, learn to think like
them. *They have people paid big bucks to keep them out of financial
trouble, certainly more than you or I can afford.

how does one think like a thief who bribes politicians when one has no
money to bribe politicians?


When government said nothing to worry about re-debt markets in 2007 and
again in 2008, this was your/our first red flag.

me and ever nobel prize winning economist on the planet.

You can sit on your arse and bitch about the rich, but there are good
reasons why they have money and you do not.

yeah. they inherit it and bribe politicians to game the system so we
have NO choice BUT to invest with them.

so the REAL answer is to change the system instead of doing like YOU
recommend which is to pat them on the back for being such good thieves

*And the reason is simple,
they do their research and humbly and rationally know the markets on how
they really operate.

bull****. pure bull****. if they did so, they wouldnt have to come to
me and ask me to bail them out after they stole my money

They didn't come to you. 'Bama came to you. And, like a dummy, you
said OK.

On Oct 12, 3:58*pm, John H wrote:
On Mon, 12 Oct 2009 11:25:04 -0700 (PDT), wf3h
wrote:





On Oct 12, 12:35*pm, Canuck57 wrote:
wf3h wrote:

my corrective action is not to trust the rich anymore...you're too
stupid to learn that

Instead of envy, distrust and hate of the rich, learn to think like
them. *They have people paid big bucks to keep them out of financial
trouble, certainly more than you or I can afford.

how does one think like a thief who bribes politicians when one has no
money to bribe politicians?

When government said nothing to worry about re-debt markets in 2007 and
again in 2008, this was your/our first red flag.

me and ever nobel prize winning economist on the planet.

You can sit on your arse and bitch about the rich, but there are good
reasons why they have money and you do not.

yeah. they inherit it and bribe politicians to game the system so we
have NO choice BUT to invest with them.

so the REAL answer is to change the system instead of doing like YOU
recommend which is to pat them on the back for being such good thieves

*And the reason is simple,
they do their research and humbly and rationally know the markets on how
they really operate.

bull****. pure bull****. if they did so, they wouldnt have to come to
me and ask me to bail them out after they stole my money

They didn't come to you. 'Bama came to you. And, like a dummy, you
said OK.-

guess you forgot bush was president the last 8 years.

i'll just keep repeating this since it's obvious you have alzheimer's

wf3h wrote:
On Oct 12, 3:58 pm, John H wrote:
On Mon, 12 Oct 2009 11:25:04 -0700 (PDT), wf3h
wrote:





On Oct 12, 12:35 pm, Canuck57 wrote:
wf3h wrote:
my corrective action is not to trust the rich anymore...you're too
stupid to learn that
Instead of envy, distrust and hate of the rich, learn to think like
them. They have people paid big bucks to keep them out of financial
trouble, certainly more than you or I can afford.
how does one think like a thief who bribes politicians when one has no
money to bribe politicians?
When government said nothing to worry about re-debt markets in 2007 and
again in 2008, this was your/our first red flag.
me and ever nobel prize winning economist on the planet.
You can sit on your arse and bitch about the rich, but there are good
reasons why they have money and you do not.
yeah. they inherit it and bribe politicians to game the system so we
have NO choice BUT to invest with them.
so the REAL answer is to change the system instead of doing like YOU
recommend which is to pat them on the back for being such good thieves
And the reason is simple,
they do their research and humbly and rationally know the markets on how
they really operate.
bull****. pure bull****. if they did so, they wouldnt have to come to
me and ask me to bail them out after they stole my money
They didn't come to you. 'Bama came to you. And, like a dummy, you
said OK.-

guess you forgot bush was president the last 8 years.

i'll just keep repeating this since it's obvious you have alzheimer's

Bush set the stage for the bailouts. He stalled and let Obama do the
dirty work.

To those who listen to the well organized Republican "keep it on track"
messages, Obama is the bad guy. Only works if you ignore the last 8
years of irresponsibility. Easy to do if you get your news from the Fox
News Corp.

wf3h wrote:
On Oct 12, 3:58 pm, John H wrote:
On Mon, 12 Oct 2009 11:25:04 -0700 (PDT), wf3h
wrote:





On Oct 12, 12:35 pm, Canuck57 wrote:
wf3h wrote:
my corrective action is not to trust the rich anymore...you're too
stupid to learn that
Instead of envy, distrust and hate of the rich, learn to think like
them. They have people paid big bucks to keep them out of financial
trouble, certainly more than you or I can afford.
how does one think like a thief who bribes politicians when one has no
money to bribe politicians?
When government said nothing to worry about re-debt markets in 2007 and
again in 2008, this was your/our first red flag.
me and ever nobel prize winning economist on the planet.
You can sit on your arse and bitch about the rich, but there are good
reasons why they have money and you do not.
yeah. they inherit it and bribe politicians to game the system so we
have NO choice BUT to invest with them.
so the REAL answer is to change the system instead of doing like YOU
recommend which is to pat them on the back for being such good thieves
And the reason is simple,
they do their research and humbly and rationally know the markets on how
they really operate.
bull****. pure bull****. if they did so, they wouldnt have to come to
me and ask me to bail them out after they stole my money
They didn't come to you. 'Bama came to you. And, like a dummy, you
said OK.-

guess you forgot bush was president the last 8 years.

i'll just keep repeating this since it's obvious you have alzheimer's

Then by that logic, Bush should get the Nobel prize Obama just got.
Can't have it both ways and say there is a rational bone in your body.

Canuck57 wrote:
wf3h wrote:
On Oct 12, 3:58 pm, John H wrote:
On Mon, 12 Oct 2009 11:25:04 -0700 (PDT), wf3h
wrote:





On Oct 12, 12:35 pm, Canuck57 wrote:
wf3h wrote:
my corrective action is not to trust the rich anymore...you're too
stupid to learn that
Instead of envy, distrust and hate of the rich, learn to think like
them. They have people paid big bucks to keep them out of financial
trouble, certainly more than you or I can afford.
how does one think like a thief who bribes politicians when one has no
money to bribe politicians?
When government said nothing to worry about re-debt markets in 2007
and
again in 2008, this was your/our first red flag.
me and ever nobel prize winning economist on the planet.
You can sit on your arse and bitch about the rich, but there are good
reasons why they have money and you do not.
yeah. they inherit it and bribe politicians to game the system so we
have NO choice BUT to invest with them.
so the REAL answer is to change the system instead of doing like YOU
recommend which is to pat them on the back for being such good thieves
And the reason is simple,
they do their research and humbly and rationally know the markets
on how
they really operate.
bull****. pure bull****. if they did so, they wouldnt have to come to
me and ask me to bail them out after they stole my money
They didn't come to you. 'Bama came to you. And, like a dummy, you
said OK.-

guess you forgot bush was president the last 8 years.

i'll just keep repeating this since it's obvious you have alzheimer's

Then by that logic, Bush should get the Nobel prize Obama just got.
Can't have it both ways and say there is a rational bone in your body.

Obama got the Nobel Peace Prize, not for economics. That's a different
subject. Are you really that dumb?

Bush started too many wars that didn't need to happen to get a peace
prize. The economic results weren't any better, eliminating any chance
for that prize either.

The Afghanistan war was so poorly managed that we spent 7 years fighting
with no actual accomplishment. That should warrant a jail term, not a
peace prize.

History won't be kind to Bush and I'm sure he knows it.

Jim wrote:
Canuck57 wrote:
wf3h wrote:
On Oct 12, 3:58 pm, John H wrote:
On Mon, 12 Oct 2009 11:25:04 -0700 (PDT), wf3h
wrote:





On Oct 12, 12:35 pm, Canuck57 wrote:
wf3h wrote:
my corrective action is not to trust the rich anymore...you're too
stupid to learn that
Instead of envy, distrust and hate of the rich, learn to think like
them. They have people paid big bucks to keep them out of financial
trouble, certainly more than you or I can afford.
how does one think like a thief who bribes politicians when one has no
money to bribe politicians?
When government said nothing to worry about re-debt markets in
2007 and
again in 2008, this was your/our first red flag.
me and ever nobel prize winning economist on the planet.
You can sit on your arse and bitch about the rich, but there are good
reasons why they have money and you do not.
yeah. they inherit it and bribe politicians to game the system so we
have NO choice BUT to invest with them.
so the REAL answer is to change the system instead of doing like YOU
recommend which is to pat them on the back for being such good thieves
And the reason is simple,
they do their research and humbly and rationally know the markets
on how
they really operate.
bull****. pure bull****. if they did so, they wouldnt have to come to
me and ask me to bail them out after they stole my money
They didn't come to you. 'Bama came to you. And, like a dummy, you
said OK.-

guess you forgot bush was president the last 8 years.

i'll just keep repeating this since it's obvious you have alzheimer's

Then by that logic, Bush should get the Nobel prize Obama just got.
Can't have it both ways and say there is a rational bone in your body.

Obama got the Nobel Peace Prize, not for economics. That's a different
subject. Are you really that dumb?

Bush started too many wars that didn't need to happen to get a peace
prize. The economic results weren't any better, eliminating any chance
for that prize either.

The Afghanistan war was so poorly managed that we spent 7 years fighting
with no actual accomplishment. That should warrant a jail term, not a
peace prize.

History won't be kind to Bush and I'm sure he knows it.

So you think Obama should get a Nobel prize for 8 months....

Yet isn't responsible for $1.3B trillion debt-spend in the same period???

You have a serious rationality disorder if you think that way.

I do agree with certain of your statements of the war, be it Bush or
Obama, we need to quit pandering to Afgan BS or get the hell out. Let
the Saudis fund their own protection. But there is no delivery of
pease, just US, Canadian and other dead friendlies.

On Oct 12, 4:28*pm, Canuck57 wrote:


Then by that logic, Bush should get the Nobel prize Obama just got.
Can't have it both ways and say there is a rational bone in your body.-

i'll type this slowly 'cuz i know you're a right winger and can't read

obama didn't win the ECONOMICS prize. see...economics deals with M O
N E Y

he won the PEACE prize because he decided to change bush's views on
destroying the world