HEY, MOE!
 

Sumbitch.

Some Commander in Chief.

Ignores the Generals, and is going to ask Congress what to do in
Afghanistan.

I'd say dumb as a box of rocks, but I like rocks.

Sounds like Larry, Moe, and Curly ..........

Uh, I don't know, what do you think ................?
Uh, I don't know, what do you think ................?
Uh, I don't know, what do you think ................?
Uh, I don't know, what do you think ................?
Uh, I don't know, what do you think ................?
Uh, I don't know, what do you think ................?
Uh, I don't know, what do you think ................?
Uh, I don't know, what do you think ................?
Uh, I don't know, what do you think ................?
Uh, I don't know, what do you think ................?
Uh, I don't know, what do you think ................?
Uh, I don't know, what do you think ................?
Uh, I don't know, what do you think ................?
Uh, I don't know, what do you think ................?
Uh, I don't know, what do you think ................?
Uh, I don't know, what do you think ................?
Uh, I don't know, what do you think ................?
Uh, I don't know, what do you think ................?
Uh, I don't know, what do you think ................?
Uh, I don't know, what do you think ................?

Steve

HEY, MOE!
 

"SteveB" wrote in message
...
Sumbitch.

Some Commander in Chief.

Ignores the Generals, and is going to ask Congress what to do in
Afghanistan.

I'd say dumb as a box of rocks, but I like rocks.

Sounds like Larry, Moe, and Curly ..........


Sounds like he's consulting with Congress. Gee, what a novel concept.

--
Nom=de=Plume

HEY, MOE!
 

nom=de=plume wrote:
"SteveB" wrote in message
...
Sumbitch.

Some Commander in Chief.

Ignores the Generals, and is going to ask Congress what to do in
Afghanistan.

I'd say dumb as a box of rocks, but I like rocks.

Sounds like Larry, Moe, and Curly ..........


Sounds like he's consulting with Congress. Gee, what a novel concept.

Like barney and nancy or even stretch kerry know anything about the
middle east, let alone war strategy. Cmon sweetie, you have a brain, use it.

HEY, MOE!
 

On Tue, 6 Oct 2009 13:29:22 -0600, "SteveB"
wrote:

Sumbitch.

Some Commander in Chief.

Ignores the Generals, and is going to ask Congress what to do in
Afghanistan.

I'd say dumb as a box of rocks, but I like rocks.

Sounds like Larry, Moe, and Curly ..........

Uh, I don't know, what do you think ................?

several snipped......?

Uh, I don't know, what do you think ................?

Steve


Here's what 'Bama has as advisors:

http://tinyurl.com/yb525xo

Generals should not offer opinions. They're job is simply to do as
they're told by someone with all the combat experience of a slug.

HEY, MOE!
 

On Tue, 06 Oct 2009 16:30:18 -0400, John H Rant wrote:


http://tinyurl.com/yb525xo

Generals should not offer opinions. They're job is simply to do as
they're told by someone with all the combat experience of a slug.

Reading challenged, again? That's not what that article said. A quote
from Gates, "provide our best advice to the president candidly but
privately." For a General to *publicly* campaign for his ideas limits
his commanders options, and undermines his commanders authority.
McChrystal should keep in mind, he serves at the President's pleasure.
If he doesn't agree with Obama's policies, he should quit.

HEY, MOE!
 

On Tue, 06 Oct 2009 16:04:03 -0500, thunder
wrote:

On Tue, 06 Oct 2009 16:30:18 -0400, John H Rant wrote:


http://tinyurl.com/yb525xo

Generals should not offer opinions. They're job is simply to do as
they're told by someone with all the combat experience of a slug.

Reading challenged, again? That's not what that article said. A quote
from Gates, "provide our best advice to the president candidly but
privately." For a General to *publicly* campaign for his ideas limits
his commanders options, and undermines his commanders authority.
McChrystal should keep in mind, he serves at the President's pleasure.
If he doesn't agree with Obama's policies, he should quit.

Gosh, when Gen. Shinseki did basically the same thing, he was hailed
as a hero by you liberals.

My goodness. Such standards.

McChrystal did, in fact, agree with 'Bama's policies. 'Bama said this
was a war of necessity for the United States. Based on that 'policy'
McChrystal supported his President by emphasizing the requirement for
more troops.

But, you liberals are not fond of the idea. Giving up seems to be more
your style.

Perhaps you should just call names.

HEY, MOE!
 

On Tue, 06 Oct 2009 17:20:16 -0400, John H Rant wrote:

On Tue, 06 Oct 2009 16:04:03 -0500, thunder
wrote:

On Tue, 06 Oct 2009 16:30:18 -0400, John H Rant wrote:


http://tinyurl.com/yb525xo

Generals should not offer opinions. They're job is simply to do as
they're told by someone with all the combat experience of a slug.

Reading challenged, again? That's not what that article said. A quote
from Gates, "provide our best advice to the president candidly but
privately." For a General to *publicly* campaign for his ideas limits
his commanders options, and undermines his commanders authority.
McChrystal should keep in mind, he serves at the President's pleasure.
If he doesn't agree with Obama's policies, he should quit.

Gosh, when Gen. Shinseki did basically the same thing, he was hailed as
a hero by you liberals.

Bull****! Gen. Shinseki was testifying before U.S. Senate Armed Services
Committee, and was answering a direct question when he made those troop
level statements. His career also suffered because of that statement.

My goodness. Such standards.

McChrystal did, in fact, agree with 'Bama's policies. 'Bama said this
was a war of necessity for the United States. Based on that 'policy'
McChrystal supported his President by emphasizing the requirement for
more troops.

But, you liberals are not fond of the idea. Giving up seems to be more
your style.

Perhaps you should just call names.

HEY, MOE!
 

On 10/6/09 5:29 PM, thunder wrote:
On Tue, 06 Oct 2009 17:20:16 -0400, John H Rant wrote:

On Tue, 06 Oct 2009 16:04:03 -0500,
wrote:

On Tue, 06 Oct 2009 16:30:18 -0400, John H Rant wrote:


http://tinyurl.com/yb525xo

Generals should not offer opinions. They're job is simply to do as
they're told by someone with all the combat experience of a slug.

Reading challenged, again? That's not what that article said. A quote
from Gates, "provide our best advice to the president candidly but
privately." For a General to *publicly* campaign for his ideas limits
his commanders options, and undermines his commanders authority.
McChrystal should keep in mind, he serves at the President's pleasure.
If he doesn't agree with Obama's policies, he should quit.

Gosh, when Gen. Shinseki did basically the same thing, he was hailed as
a hero by you liberals.

Bull****! Gen. Shinseki was testifying before U.S. Senate Armed Services
Committee, and was answering a direct question when he made those troop
level statements. His career also suffered because of that statement.

My goodness. Such standards.

McChrystal did, in fact, agree with 'Bama's policies. 'Bama said this
was a war of necessity for the United States. Based on that 'policy'
McChrystal supported his President by emphasizing the requirement for
more troops.

But, you liberals are not fond of the idea. Giving up seems to be more
your style.

Perhaps you should just call names.




The military's goal is to have never-ending supplies of materiel and
manpower so as to keep themselves in uniform.

--
Birther-Deather-Tenther-Teabagger:
Idiots All

HEY, MOE!
 

On Tue, 06 Oct 2009 16:29:06 -0500, thunder
wrote:

On Tue, 06 Oct 2009 17:20:16 -0400, John H Rant wrote:

On Tue, 06 Oct 2009 16:04:03 -0500, thunder
wrote:

On Tue, 06 Oct 2009 16:30:18 -0400, John H Rant wrote:


http://tinyurl.com/yb525xo

Generals should not offer opinions. They're job is simply to do as
they're told by someone with all the combat experience of a slug.

Reading challenged, again? That's not what that article said. A quote
from Gates, "provide our best advice to the president candidly but
privately." For a General to *publicly* campaign for his ideas limits
his commanders options, and undermines his commanders authority.
McChrystal should keep in mind, he serves at the President's pleasure.
If he doesn't agree with Obama's policies, he should quit.

Gosh, when Gen. Shinseki did basically the same thing, he was hailed as
a hero by you liberals.

Bull****! Gen. Shinseki was testifying before U.S. Senate Armed Services
Committee, and was answering a direct question when he made those troop
level statements. His career also suffered because of that statement.

My goodness. Such standards.

McChrystal did, in fact, agree with 'Bama's policies. 'Bama said this
was a war of necessity for the United States. Based on that 'policy'
McChrystal supported his President by emphasizing the requirement for
more troops.

But, you liberals are not fond of the idea. Giving up seems to be more
your style.

Perhaps you should just call names.

Are you denying he became a liberal hero because he verbally disagreed
with the President's policies? Shouldn't he have quit?

Again, perhaps you should just call names.

HEY, MOE!
 

"Jim" wrote in message
...
nom=de=plume wrote:
"SteveB" wrote in message
...
Sumbitch.

Some Commander in Chief.

Ignores the Generals, and is going to ask Congress what to do in
Afghanistan.

I'd say dumb as a box of rocks, but I like rocks.

Sounds like Larry, Moe, and Curly ..........


Sounds like he's consulting with Congress. Gee, what a novel concept.

Like barney and nancy or even stretch kerry know anything about the middle
east, let alone war strategy. Cmon sweetie, you have a brain, use it.


Cmon Jimmy Bob... they all have more knowledge about the middle east than
than you or I. Is war strategy the only aspect worth considering? That's
what Bush supposedly did or didn't? First, he's the decider, then he listens
to his generals. Which is it.

--
Nom=de=Plume