Finally found it.

http://tierneylab.blogs.nytimes.com/...port-assailed/

Heh.

On Tue, 06 Oct 2009 10:20:14 -0400, Gene
wrote:

Seems any time you "alloy" science with things like politics and/or
religion, some sort of "chemical reaction" takes place and you get a
new "compound" designed to control people's thoughts.... that has
little to nothing to do with the original science.

Very true. And you hit the nail on the head - "peer" reviewed science
isn't always unbiased if it serves a political cause. And it's the
same with the Obama administration - witness the two morons running
Energy and Obama's Science "advisor".

The are some really interesting features if you will involved in this
whole debate - the view that CO2 is a pollutant and the whole hockey
stick graph that started the whole debate - both of which are based on
biased and faulty data and in the case of the infamous hockey stick
graph, clearly designed to do some wool pulling over eyes.

We really need to get together for lunch sometime - we could have some
really fun discussions. :)