Maybe the Obamas should have stayed home...
 

In article cd228248-97f1-42e4-9a3e-e589176718d3
@l35g2000vba.googlegroups.com, says...

On Oct 2, 2:12*pm, Frogwatch wrote:


Ya know what's really sad? *Obama is the best of a bad lot. *We gotta
keep him cuz otherwise we'd have President Biden or Pelosi who are
even stupider.

we could have really screwed ourselves....'mccain/palin'...there's a
combo that'll send normal people shrieking into the hills

Uh, Lemmings usually end up over a cliff...

Maybe the Obamas should have stayed home...
 

nom=de=plume wrote:
"Frogwatch" wrote in message
...
On Oct 2, 1:43 pm, Frogwatch wrote:
On Oct 2, 1:39 pm, Jack wrote:



On Oct 2, 1:24 pm, H the K wrote:
On 10/2/09 1:20 PM, Jack wrote:
On Oct 2, 12:54 pm, wrote:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport2/hi/olym...es/8283061.stm
...or maybe they could have pushed for Detroit, a city in dire need
of
help.
Chicago was out in the *first* round... that's a resounding NO on
the
international stage.
Yet the MSM, just this morning, were claiming that the visit pushed
Chicago into the lead, calling the Obamas "rock stars". ~snerk~
Rio was the city of choice all along. Obama did the right thing by
trying to sell Chicago's bid, and I'm sure he'd do it again if he had
the chance.
Yep, Rio was in the lead, and all reports had Chicago second. Seems
something pushed them to the bottom.
When is your state holding the Klan Konvention?
Dunno. Check in with the Klan HQ next door there in Maryland, and
post back here with the results.
"Obama" is Demospeak for "Pathetic Loser".

Will we have a pronouncement on how the IOC is racist?


Or, more likely, they decided to give Brazil a chance, and they were
convinced the games would be financed properly.

I find it highly interesting that you and a couple of others continually
mention race. Are you compensating for something?

He's just projecting what Harry will say sooner or later.

Maybe the Obamas should have stayed home...
 

nom=de=plume wrote:
"Frogwatch" wrote in message
...
On Oct 2, 1:47 pm, H the K wrote:
On 10/2/09 1:43 PM, Frogwatch wrote:



On Oct 2, 1:39 pm, wrote:
On Oct 2, 1:24 pm, H the wrote:
On 10/2/09 1:20 PM, Jack wrote:
On Oct 2, 12:54 pm, wrote:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport2/hi/olym...es/8283061.stm
...or maybe they could have pushed for Detroit, a city in dire need
of
help.
Chicago was out in the *first* round... that's a resounding NO on the
international stage.
Yet the MSM, just this morning, were claiming that the visit pushed
Chicago into the lead, calling the Obamas "rock stars". ~snerk~
Rio was the city of choice all along. Obama did the right thing by
trying to sell Chicago's bid, and I'm sure he'd do it again if he had
the chance.
Yep, Rio was in the lead, and all reports had Chicago second. Seems
something pushed them to the bottom.
When is your state holding the Klan Konvention?
Dunno. Check in with the Klan HQ next door there in Maryland, and
post back here with the results.
"Obama" is Demospeak for "Pathetic Loser".
Uh-huh. If Obama is a loser, your Republicans aren't even in the
contest. Hell, your party is dominated by the likes of Limbaugh, that
crazy broad representative from Minnesota (Bachmann), the quitter known
as Sarah Palin, Glenn the Crying Loonie Beck and a seemingly endless
list of perverts.

--
Birther-Deather-Tenther-Teabagger:
Idiots All

Dems, ya know yer scrapin bottom when the french call yur pres a
surrender monkey and an appeaser, not to mention the Brits who call
him "President Pantywaist".


News flash... if you're a US citizen, he's your president too. Are all the
French calling him this? All the Brits? Or, more likely a few people here
and there.
More here than there, Sweetie.

Maybe the Obamas should have stayed home...
 

On Oct 2, 3:38*pm, tiny wrote:
In article , says...



wf3h wrote:
On Oct 2, 12:54 pm, JohnH wrote:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport2/hi/olym...es/8283061.stm

...or maybe they could have pushed for Detroit, a city in dire need of
help.
--

yawn....

Did you know! That when you yawn it means that your brain isn't getting
enough oxygen.....Really. But this is only one of the many hints you've
given us.

Well you now how it is. They wanted Obama's friends to get all the
money. Can you imagine the pork fest if they had?

there's no money left. bush's friends stole it all...did you check the
stock market under bush?

oh. right wingers don't keep up with current events.

Maybe the Obamas should have stayed home...
 

On Oct 2, 3:50*pm, tiny wrote:
In article cd228248-97f1-42e4-9a3e-e589176718d3
@l35g2000vba.googlegroups.com, says...



On Oct 2, 2:12*pm, Frogwatch wrote:

Ya know what's really sad? *Obama is the best of a bad lot. *We gotta
keep him cuz otherwise we'd have President Biden or Pelosi who are
even stupider.

we could have really screwed ourselves....'mccain/palin'...there's a
combo that'll send normal people shrieking into the hills

Uh, Lemmings usually end up over a cliff...

yeah i know. even the GOP, after 8 tragic years of bush, couldnt find
anymore idiots to vote for the GOP

Maybe the Obamas should have stayed home...
 

On Oct 2, 3:26*pm, JohnH wrote:
On Fri, 2 Oct 2009 10:20:04 -0700 (PDT), Jack
wrote:

On Oct 2, 12:54*pm, JohnH wrote:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport2/hi/olym...es/8283061.stm

...or maybe they could have pushed for Detroit, a city in dire need of
help.

Chicago was out in the *first* round... that's a resounding NO on the
international stage.

Yet the MSM, just this morning, were claiming that the visit pushed
Chicago into the lead, calling the Obamas "rock stars". *~snerk~

I'll bet Bush could have gotten Chicago selected. Laura would have
come across as much more sincere. Michelle sounded like a fake in her
speech.

ROFLMAO!! since bush is widely known as a liar, there was no chance of
him getting a dog catcher's convention, let alone the olympics.

Maybe the Obamas should have stayed home...
 

On Fri, 02 Oct 2009 15:51:58 -0400, Jim wrote:

nom=de=plume wrote:
"Frogwatch" wrote in message
...
On Oct 2, 1:43 pm, Frogwatch wrote:
On Oct 2, 1:39 pm, Jack wrote:



On Oct 2, 1:24 pm, H the K wrote:
On 10/2/09 1:20 PM, Jack wrote:
On Oct 2, 12:54 pm, wrote:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport2/hi/olym...es/8283061.stm
...or maybe they could have pushed for Detroit, a city in dire need
of
help.
Chicago was out in the *first* round... that's a resounding NO on
the
international stage.
Yet the MSM, just this morning, were claiming that the visit pushed
Chicago into the lead, calling the Obamas "rock stars". ~snerk~
Rio was the city of choice all along. Obama did the right thing by
trying to sell Chicago's bid, and I'm sure he'd do it again if he had
the chance.
Yep, Rio was in the lead, and all reports had Chicago second. Seems
something pushed them to the bottom.
When is your state holding the Klan Konvention?
Dunno. Check in with the Klan HQ next door there in Maryland, and
post back here with the results.
"Obama" is Demospeak for "Pathetic Loser".

Will we have a pronouncement on how the IOC is racist?


Or, more likely, they decided to give Brazil a chance, and they were
convinced the games would be financed properly.

I find it highly interesting that you and a couple of others continually
mention race. Are you compensating for something?

He's just projecting what Harry will say sooner or later.

I wonder what she expects when her BFF is calling us racist with every
post?

The IOC is obviously racist. That's one more reason Laura Bush would
have been successfull in getting the Olympics here. Well, maybe not in
Chicago, but at least in Crawford or Dallas or somewhere cool.
--
John H

All decisions, even those of liberals, are the result of binary thinking.

Maybe the Obamas should have stayed home...
 

wf3h wrote:
On Oct 2, 3:50 pm, tiny wrote:
In article cd228248-97f1-42e4-9a3e-e589176718d3
@l35g2000vba.googlegroups.com, says...



On Oct 2, 2:12 pm, Frogwatch wrote:
Ya know what's really sad? Obama is the best of a bad lot. We gotta
keep him cuz otherwise we'd have President Biden or Pelosi who are
even stupider.
we could have really screwed ourselves....'mccain/palin'...there's a
combo that'll send normal people shrieking into the hills
Uh, Lemmings usually end up over a cliff...

yeah i know. even the GOP, after 8 tragic years of bush, couldnt find
anymore idiots to vote for the GOP

I agree. All the idiots voted for O'Bama.

Maybe the Obamas should have stayed home...
 

"Jim" wrote in message
...
nom=de=plume wrote:
"Frogwatch" wrote in message
...
On Oct 2, 1:43 pm, Frogwatch wrote:
On Oct 2, 1:39 pm, Jack wrote:



On Oct 2, 1:24 pm, H the K wrote:
On 10/2/09 1:20 PM, Jack wrote:
On Oct 2, 12:54 pm, wrote:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport2/hi/olym...es/8283061.stm
...or maybe they could have pushed for Detroit, a city in dire need
of
help.
Chicago was out in the *first* round... that's a resounding NO on the
international stage.
Yet the MSM, just this morning, were claiming that the visit pushed
Chicago into the lead, calling the Obamas "rock stars". ~snerk~
Rio was the city of choice all along. Obama did the right thing by
trying to sell Chicago's bid, and I'm sure he'd do it again if he had
the chance.
Yep, Rio was in the lead, and all reports had Chicago second. Seems
something pushed them to the bottom.
When is your state holding the Klan Konvention?
Dunno. Check in with the Klan HQ next door there in Maryland, and
post back here with the results.
"Obama" is Demospeak for "Pathetic Loser".

Will we have a pronouncement on how the IOC is racist?


Or, more likely, they decided to give Brazil a chance, and they were
convinced the games would be financed properly.

I find it highly interesting that you and a couple of others continually
mention race. Are you compensating for something?

He's just projecting what Harry will say sooner or later.


Perhaps, but the more likely explanation, unless you're claiming he's
fixated by Harry, is that he's compensating.

--
Nom=de=Plume

Maybe the Obamas should have stayed home...
 

"JohnH" wrote in message
...
On Fri, 02 Oct 2009 15:51:58 -0400, Jim wrote:

nom=de=plume wrote:
"Frogwatch" wrote in message
...
On Oct 2, 1:43 pm, Frogwatch wrote:
On Oct 2, 1:39 pm, Jack wrote:



On Oct 2, 1:24 pm, H the K wrote:
On 10/2/09 1:20 PM, Jack wrote:
On Oct 2, 12:54 pm, wrote:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport2/hi/olym...es/8283061.stm
...or maybe they could have pushed for Detroit, a city in dire need
of
help.
Chicago was out in the *first* round... that's a resounding NO on
the
international stage.
Yet the MSM, just this morning, were claiming that the visit pushed
Chicago into the lead, calling the Obamas "rock stars". ~snerk~
Rio was the city of choice all along. Obama did the right thing by
trying to sell Chicago's bid, and I'm sure he'd do it again if he had
the chance.
Yep, Rio was in the lead, and all reports had Chicago second. Seems
something pushed them to the bottom.
When is your state holding the Klan Konvention?
Dunno. Check in with the Klan HQ next door there in Maryland, and
post back here with the results.
"Obama" is Demospeak for "Pathetic Loser".

Will we have a pronouncement on how the IOC is racist?


Or, more likely, they decided to give Brazil a chance, and they were
convinced the games would be financed properly.

I find it highly interesting that you and a couple of others continually
mention race. Are you compensating for something?

He's just projecting what Harry will say sooner or later.

I wonder what she expects when her BFF is calling us racist with every
post?

The IOC is obviously racist. That's one more reason Laura Bush would
have been successfull in getting the Olympics here. Well, maybe not in
Chicago, but at least in Crawford or Dallas or somewhere cool.
--
John H

All decisions, even those of liberals, are the result of binary thinking.


What's a BFF? I think you're making that case all by yourself.

--
Nom=de=Plume