|
Hah!! Take that Darwin!!
http://news.nationalgeographic.com/n...s-ramidus.html
On a related note, a respected evolutionary anthropologist, Dr. C. Owen Lovejoy, is positing a theory that man didn't evolve from apes but apes evolved from humans. http://www.breitbart.com/article.php...e= 1&catnum=3 And Dr. Lovejoy has some serious chops in this area. Personally, I'm in the Alien Intervention camp as far as evolution goes. We are either the remnants of an advanced civilization (yeah, yeah - that's the whole BSG ending, but that idea was around for a hell of a longer time than BSG) or an advanced civilization intervened by boosting species intelligence and curiosity (well with the exception of progressives and liberals - every species has it's evolutionary failures and it's pretty obvious in our case) and out we popped. That's my story and I'm sticking to it. :) |
Hah!! Take that Darwin!!
Tom Francis - SWSports wrote:
http://news.nationalgeographic.com/n...s-ramidus.html On a related note, a respected evolutionary anthropologist, Dr. C. Owen Lovejoy, is positing a theory that man didn't evolve from apes but apes evolved from humans. http://www.breitbart.com/article.php...e= 1&catnum=3 And Dr. Lovejoy has some serious chops in this area. Personally, I'm in the Alien Intervention camp as far as evolution goes. We are either the remnants of an advanced civilization (yeah, yeah - that's the whole BSG ending, but that idea was around for a hell of a longer time than BSG) or an advanced civilization intervened by boosting species intelligence and curiosity (well with the exception of progressives and liberals - every species has it's evolutionary failures and it's pretty obvious in our case) and out we popped. That's my story and I'm sticking to it. :) I wasn't paying close attention to the news story last night but anthropologists, recently, have found a new link that supports evolution theory. They are dating it back 2 million years. I think they are calling it ardi or emmm or something like that. |
Hah!! Take that Darwin!!
"Jim" wrote in message ... Tom Francis - SWSports wrote: http://news.nationalgeographic.com/n...s-ramidus.html On a related note, a respected evolutionary anthropologist, Dr. C. Owen Lovejoy, is positing a theory that man didn't evolve from apes but apes evolved from humans. http://www.breitbart.com/article.php...e= 1&catnum=3 And Dr. Lovejoy has some serious chops in this area. Personally, I'm in the Alien Intervention camp as far as evolution goes. We are either the remnants of an advanced civilization (yeah, yeah - that's the whole BSG ending, but that idea was around for a hell of a longer time than BSG) or an advanced civilization intervened by boosting species intelligence and curiosity (well with the exception of progressives and liberals - every species has it's evolutionary failures and it's pretty obvious in our case) and out we popped. That's my story and I'm sticking to it. :) I wasn't paying close attention to the news story last night but anthropologists, recently, have found a new link that supports evolution theory. They are dating it back 2 million years. I think they are calling it ardi or emmm or something like that. So, thats 1 for evolution and 0 for creationism? |
Hah!! Take that Darwin!!
On Fri, 2 Oct 2009 09:34:41 -0400, "mmc" wrote:
So, thats 1 for evolution and 0 for creationism? Evolution is a known fact so how does it score points on a theory ? They don't compete. Casady |
Hah!! Take that Darwin!!
On 10/2/09 9:47 AM, Richard Casady wrote:
On Fri, 2 Oct 2009 09:34:41 -0400, wrote: So, thats 1 for evolution and 0 for creationism? Evolution is a known fact so how does it score points on a theory ? They don't compete. Casady I saw a discussion on one of the right wing boards that claimed the "discovery" was false, because creation took place about 6000 years ago. These, of course, are the birther-deather-teabagger folk in their element. -- Birther-Deather-Tenther-Teabagger: Idiots All |
Hah!! Take that Darwin!!
On Fri, 2 Oct 2009 09:34:41 -0400, "mmc" wrote:
"Jim" wrote in message . .. Tom Francis - SWSports wrote: http://news.nationalgeographic.com/n...s-ramidus.html On a related note, a respected evolutionary anthropologist, Dr. C. Owen Lovejoy, is positing a theory that man didn't evolve from apes but apes evolved from humans. http://www.breitbart.com/article.php...e= 1&catnum=3 And Dr. Lovejoy has some serious chops in this area. Personally, I'm in the Alien Intervention camp as far as evolution goes. We are either the remnants of an advanced civilization (yeah, yeah - that's the whole BSG ending, but that idea was around for a hell of a longer time than BSG) or an advanced civilization intervened by boosting species intelligence and curiosity (well with the exception of progressives and liberals - every species has it's evolutionary failures and it's pretty obvious in our case) and out we popped. That's my story and I'm sticking to it. :) I wasn't paying close attention to the news story last night but anthropologists, recently, have found a new link that supports evolution theory. They are dating it back 2 million years. I think they are calling it ardi or emmm or something like that. So, thats 1 for evolution and 0 for creationism? No, it's 2 for Intelligent Design. -- John H All decisions, even those of liberals, are the result of binary thinking. |
Hah!! Take that Darwin!!
On 10/2/09 11:58 AM, Gene wrote: On Fri, 02 Oct 2009 11:36:46 -0400, wrote: No, it's 2 for Intelligent Design. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PvLnHfw3cOo There's no intelligence in intelligent design. It's just more religious poppycock-bullship. -- Birther-Deather-Tenther-Teabagger: Idiots All |
Hah!! Take that Darwin!!
On Fri, 02 Oct 2009 11:58:51 -0400, Gene
wrote: On Fri, 02 Oct 2009 11:36:46 -0400, JohnH wrote: No, it's 2 for Intelligent Design. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PvLnHfw3cOo But, even the video admits, *someone or something* built the airplane. It didn't just 'happen'. -- John H All decisions, even those of liberals, are the result of binary thinking. |
Hah!! Take that Darwin!!
On Fri, 02 Oct 2009 11:58:51 -0400, Gene
wrote: On Fri, 02 Oct 2009 11:36:46 -0400, JohnH wrote: No, it's 2 for Intelligent Design. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PvLnHfw3cOo But, at least Harry agrees with you. That should be comforting as hell. :) -- John H All decisions, even those of liberals, are the result of binary thinking. |
Hah!! Take that Darwin!!
"Jim" wrote in message
... Tom Francis - SWSports wrote: http://news.nationalgeographic.com/n...s-ramidus.html On a related note, a respected evolutionary anthropologist, Dr. C. Owen Lovejoy, is positing a theory that man didn't evolve from apes but apes evolved from humans. http://www.breitbart.com/article.php...e= 1&catnum=3 And Dr. Lovejoy has some serious chops in this area. Personally, I'm in the Alien Intervention camp as far as evolution goes. We are either the remnants of an advanced civilization (yeah, yeah - that's the whole BSG ending, but that idea was around for a hell of a longer time than BSG) or an advanced civilization intervened by boosting species intelligence and curiosity (well with the exception of progressives and liberals - every species has it's evolutionary failures and it's pretty obvious in our case) and out we popped. That's my story and I'm sticking to it. :) I wasn't paying close attention to the news story last night but anthropologists, recently, have found a new link that supports evolution theory. They are dating it back 2 million years. I think they are calling it ardi or emmm or something like that. It's Arti. I certainly have some relatives that are throwbacks, however. -- Nom=de=Plume |
Hah!! Take that Darwin!!
nom=de=plume wrote:
"Jim" wrote in message ... Tom Francis - SWSports wrote: http://news.nationalgeographic.com/n...s-ramidus.html On a related note, a respected evolutionary anthropologist, Dr. C. Owen Lovejoy, is positing a theory that man didn't evolve from apes but apes evolved from humans. http://www.breitbart.com/article.php...e= 1&catnum=3 And Dr. Lovejoy has some serious chops in this area. Personally, I'm in the Alien Intervention camp as far as evolution goes. We are either the remnants of an advanced civilization (yeah, yeah - that's the whole BSG ending, but that idea was around for a hell of a longer time than BSG) or an advanced civilization intervened by boosting species intelligence and curiosity (well with the exception of progressives and liberals - every species has it's evolutionary failures and it's pretty obvious in our case) and out we popped. That's my story and I'm sticking to it. :) I wasn't paying close attention to the news story last night but anthropologists, recently, have found a new link that supports evolution theory. They are dating it back 2 million years. I think they are calling it ardi or emmm or something like that. It's Arti. I certainly have some relatives that are throwbacks, however. We all do. That is if you subscribe to evolution. That still leaves room for a god or gods to be the creator of the creatures we evolved from. Some nice Jehovah's ladies stopped by today while I was out exercising the dog. They must have seen that I need enlightening. After they delivered their message from Jehova, I tried my theory on them but they didn't buy it. So where are you in this Cre/Evo controversy. I'll bet you have some strong opinions. |
Hah!! Take that Darwin!!
"Jim" wrote in message
... nom=de=plume wrote: "Jim" wrote in message ... Tom Francis - SWSports wrote: http://news.nationalgeographic.com/n...s-ramidus.html On a related note, a respected evolutionary anthropologist, Dr. C. Owen Lovejoy, is positing a theory that man didn't evolve from apes but apes evolved from humans. http://www.breitbart.com/article.php...e= 1&catnum=3 And Dr. Lovejoy has some serious chops in this area. Personally, I'm in the Alien Intervention camp as far as evolution goes. We are either the remnants of an advanced civilization (yeah, yeah - that's the whole BSG ending, but that idea was around for a hell of a longer time than BSG) or an advanced civilization intervened by boosting species intelligence and curiosity (well with the exception of progressives and liberals - every species has it's evolutionary failures and it's pretty obvious in our case) and out we popped. That's my story and I'm sticking to it. :) I wasn't paying close attention to the news story last night but anthropologists, recently, have found a new link that supports evolution theory. They are dating it back 2 million years. I think they are calling it ardi or emmm or something like that. It's Arti. I certainly have some relatives that are throwbacks, however. We all do. That is if you subscribe to evolution. That still leaves room for a god or gods to be the creator of the creatures we evolved from. Some nice Jehovah's ladies stopped by today while I was out exercising the dog. They must have seen that I need enlightening. After they delivered their message from Jehova, I tried my theory on them but they didn't buy it. So where are you in this Cre/Evo controversy. I'll bet you have some strong opinions. Are you claiming you don't "subscribe" to evolution? My opinion is supported by the facts of evolution. -- Nom=de=Plume |
Hah!! Take that Darwin!!
nom=de=plume wrote:
"Jim" wrote in message ... nom=de=plume wrote: "Jim" wrote in message ... Tom Francis - SWSports wrote: http://news.nationalgeographic.com/n...s-ramidus.html On a related note, a respected evolutionary anthropologist, Dr. C. Owen Lovejoy, is positing a theory that man didn't evolve from apes but apes evolved from humans. http://www.breitbart.com/article.php...e= 1&catnum=3 And Dr. Lovejoy has some serious chops in this area. Personally, I'm in the Alien Intervention camp as far as evolution goes. We are either the remnants of an advanced civilization (yeah, yeah - that's the whole BSG ending, but that idea was around for a hell of a longer time than BSG) or an advanced civilization intervened by boosting species intelligence and curiosity (well with the exception of progressives and liberals - every species has it's evolutionary failures and it's pretty obvious in our case) and out we popped. That's my story and I'm sticking to it. :) I wasn't paying close attention to the news story last night but anthropologists, recently, have found a new link that supports evolution theory. They are dating it back 2 million years. I think they are calling it ardi or emmm or something like that. It's Arti. I certainly have some relatives that are throwbacks, however. We all do. That is if you subscribe to evolution. That still leaves room for a god or gods to be the creator of the creatures we evolved from. Some nice Jehovah's ladies stopped by today while I was out exercising the dog. They must have seen that I need enlightening. After they delivered their message from Jehova, I tried my theory on them but they didn't buy it. So where are you in this Cre/Evo controversy. I'll bet you have some strong opinions. Are you claiming you don't "subscribe" to evolution? My opinion is supported by the facts of evolution. Sounds like you're not quite awake yet. ;-) |
Hah!! Take that Darwin!!
"Jim" wrote in message
... nom=de=plume wrote: "Jim" wrote in message ... nom=de=plume wrote: "Jim" wrote in message ... Tom Francis - SWSports wrote: http://news.nationalgeographic.com/n...s-ramidus.html On a related note, a respected evolutionary anthropologist, Dr. C. Owen Lovejoy, is positing a theory that man didn't evolve from apes but apes evolved from humans. http://www.breitbart.com/article.php...e= 1&catnum=3 And Dr. Lovejoy has some serious chops in this area. Personally, I'm in the Alien Intervention camp as far as evolution goes. We are either the remnants of an advanced civilization (yeah, yeah - that's the whole BSG ending, but that idea was around for a hell of a longer time than BSG) or an advanced civilization intervened by boosting species intelligence and curiosity (well with the exception of progressives and liberals - every species has it's evolutionary failures and it's pretty obvious in our case) and out we popped. That's my story and I'm sticking to it. :) I wasn't paying close attention to the news story last night but anthropologists, recently, have found a new link that supports evolution theory. They are dating it back 2 million years. I think they are calling it ardi or emmm or something like that. It's Arti. I certainly have some relatives that are throwbacks, however. We all do. That is if you subscribe to evolution. That still leaves room for a god or gods to be the creator of the creatures we evolved from. Some nice Jehovah's ladies stopped by today while I was out exercising the dog. They must have seen that I need enlightening. After they delivered their message from Jehova, I tried my theory on them but they didn't buy it. So where are you in this Cre/Evo controversy. I'll bet you have some strong opinions. Are you claiming you don't "subscribe" to evolution? My opinion is supported by the facts of evolution. Sounds like you're not quite awake yet. ;-) ?? Don't understand. Do you or don't you believe evolution is a scientific theory supported (as they are) by facts. Scientific Theory: a well-substantiated explanation of some aspect of the natural world -- Nom=de=Plume |
Hah!! Take that Darwin!!
"Richard Casady" wrote in message ... On Fri, 2 Oct 2009 09:34:41 -0400, "mmc" wrote: So, thats 1 for evolution and 0 for creationism? Evolution is a known fact so how does it score points on a theory ? They don't compete. Casady Apples and grapes? I dunno, was trying to be funny. Been a long week. |
Hah!! Take that Darwin!!
On Fri, 02 Oct 2009 08:58:05 -0400, Jim wrote:
Tom Francis - SWSports wrote: http://news.nationalgeographic.com/n...s-ramidus.html On a related note, a respected evolutionary anthropologist, Dr. C. Owen Lovejoy, is positing a theory that man didn't evolve from apes but apes evolved from humans. http://www.breitbart.com/article.php...e= 1&catnum=3 And Dr. Lovejoy has some serious chops in this area. Personally, I'm in the Alien Intervention camp as far as evolution goes. We are either the remnants of an advanced civilization (yeah, yeah - that's the whole BSG ending, but that idea was around for a hell of a longer time than BSG) or an advanced civilization intervened by boosting species intelligence and curiosity (well with the exception of progressives and liberals - every species has it's evolutionary failures and it's pretty obvious in our case) and out we popped. That's my story and I'm sticking to it. :) I wasn't paying close attention to the news story last night but anthropologists, recently, have found a new link that supports evolution theory. They are dating it back 2 million years. I think they are calling it ardi or emmm or something like that. Yeah - that's what the first story was about. We're coming closer to understanding that there may not be a "missing link" as such - if anything, it maybe the opposite. |
Hah!! Take that Darwin!!
On Oct 2, 6:20*pm, Tom Francis - SWSports
wrote: *We're coming closer to understanding that there may not be a "missing link" as such - if anything, it maybe the opposite. Yes, and any episode of "COPS" proves it. |
Hah!! Take that Darwin!!
On Fri, 2 Oct 2009 16:36:39 -0700 (PDT), Tim
wrote: On Oct 2, 6:20*pm, Tom Francis - SWSports wrote: *We're coming closer to understanding that there may not be a "missing link" as such - if anything, it maybe the opposite. Yes, and any episode of "COPS" proves it. Ain't that the truth! -- John H All decisions, even those of liberals, are the result of binary thinking. |
Hah!! Take that Darwin!!
On 10/2/09 7:36 PM, Tim wrote:
On Oct 2, 6:20 pm, Tom Francis - SWSports wrote: We're coming closer to understanding that there may not be a "missing link" as such - if anything, it maybe the opposite. Yes, and any episode of "COPS" proves it. I missed the episode of COPS in which four New York City cops shot and killed Amadou Bailo Diallo 41 times while he was reaching for his wallet. Just another instance of missing link cops, I guess. Or was this the missing like case: Ex-Cop Sentenced To 30 Years In Prison For Torturing Haitian Immigrant In New York With Broomstick A White former patrolman was sentenced to 30 years in prison for torturing a Haitian immigrant with a broken broomstick in one of the most shocking acts of police brutality New York has ever seen. Justin Volpe, 27, who pleaded guilty to violating the victim's civil rights, could have gotten life without parole for the 1997 attack. "I hurt many people. I was and still am ashamed ... I am extremely sorry," Volpe told U.S. District Judge Eugene Nickerson. "I must and I will pay for my crime." Volpe rammed a broomstick into Abner Louima's rectum. -- Birther-Deather-Tenther-Teabagger: Idiots All |
Hah!! Take that Darwin!!
On Fri, 02 Oct 2009 11:58:51 -0400, Gene
wrote: On Fri, 02 Oct 2009 11:36:46 -0400, JohnH wrote: No, it's 2 for Intelligent Design. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PvLnHfw3cOo You know - for a smart guy, sometimes you fall into the same trap over and over and over again. The premise presented in that video is a false dichotomy by assuming that the person viewing the plane wouldn't ask the question of who made it. The assumption that Jason was a moron and couldn't have made it only works if the information provided was that either Jason or Susan made it. In terms of ID vs evolution, the forced fault line in the discussion is much wider. One is an article of faith, the other a matter of science - proponents of each want the differences to be incompatiable, but in fact, they are not. Science does not automatically mean that one cannot believe in articles of faith nor do articles of faith mean that one cannot believe in science. Thus, the set up of presentations like the one above which demonstrates a fault line that does not exist - or perhaps a better way to put it is, it does exist, but only at the margins. Modern people of faith understand that evolution in the animal kingdom exists, but that does not intefer with the belief that somebody make it, nor does it disallow following the tenants of faith and/or religion. Every belief system has it's outlyers even secular ones. Plus, as a follower of the Flying Spaghetti Monster, I resent the implication that all was not made in a boiling post of hot water. So there. :) |
Hah!! Take that Darwin!!
On Oct 2, 7:52*pm, Tom Francis - SWSports
wrote: On Fri, 02 Oct 2009 11:58:51 -0400, Gene Plus, as a follower of the Flying Spaghetti Monster, I resent the implication that all was not made in a boiling post of hot water. So there. *:) NO GARLIC FOR YOU!!!!! ?;^ Q |
Hah!! Take that Darwin!!
On Oct 2, 7:56*pm, H the K wrote:
On 10/2/09 7:36 PM, Tim wrote: On Oct 2, 6:20 pm, Tom Francis - SWSports *wrote: * We're coming closer to understanding that there may not be a "missing link" as such - if anything, it maybe the opposite. Yes, and any episode of "COPS" proves it. I missed the episode of COPS in which four New York City cops shot and killed Amadou Bailo Diallo 41 times while he was reaching for his wallet. Just another instance of missing link cops, I guess. Or was this the missing like case: Ex-Cop Sentenced To 30 Years In Prison For Torturing Haitian Immigrant In New York With Broomstick A White former patrolman was sentenced to 30 years in prison for torturing a Haitian immigrant with a broken broomstick in one of the most shocking acts of police brutality New York has ever seen. There is some sick, racist BS going on in those progressive northern cities. Thanks for pointing that out. |
Hah!! Take that Darwin!!
nom=de=plume wrote:
"Jim" wrote in message ... nom=de=plume wrote: "Jim" wrote in message ... nom=de=plume wrote: "Jim" wrote in message ... Tom Francis - SWSports wrote: http://news.nationalgeographic.com/n...s-ramidus.html On a related note, a respected evolutionary anthropologist, Dr. C. Owen Lovejoy, is positing a theory that man didn't evolve from apes but apes evolved from humans. http://www.breitbart.com/article.php...e= 1&catnum=3 And Dr. Lovejoy has some serious chops in this area. Personally, I'm in the Alien Intervention camp as far as evolution goes. We are either the remnants of an advanced civilization (yeah, yeah - that's the whole BSG ending, but that idea was around for a hell of a longer time than BSG) or an advanced civilization intervened by boosting species intelligence and curiosity (well with the exception of progressives and liberals - every species has it's evolutionary failures and it's pretty obvious in our case) and out we popped. That's my story and I'm sticking to it. :) I wasn't paying close attention to the news story last night but anthropologists, recently, have found a new link that supports evolution theory. They are dating it back 2 million years. I think they are calling it ardi or emmm or something like that. It's Arti. I certainly have some relatives that are throwbacks, however. We all do. That is if you subscribe to evolution. That still leaves room for a god or gods to be the creator of the creatures we evolved from. Some nice Jehovah's ladies stopped by today while I was out exercising the dog. They must have seen that I need enlightening. After they delivered their message from Jehova, I tried my theory on them but they didn't buy it. So where are you in this Cre/Evo controversy. I'll bet you have some strong opinions. Are you claiming you don't "subscribe" to evolution? My opinion is supported by the facts of evolution. Sounds like you're not quite awake yet. ;-) ?? Don't understand. Do you or don't you believe evolution is a scientific theory supported (as they are) by facts. Scientific Theory: a well-substantiated explanation of some aspect of the natural world The following self quote should give you a clue as to what I believe. "We all do. That is if you subscribe to evolution." |
Hah!! Take that Darwin!!
On Fri, 2 Oct 2009 18:08:32 -0700 (PDT), Tim
wrote: On Oct 2, 7:52*pm, Tom Francis - SWSports wrote: On Fri, 02 Oct 2009 11:58:51 -0400, Gene Plus, as a follower of the Flying Spaghetti Monster, I resent the implication that all was not made in a boiling post of hot water. So there. *:) NO GARLIC FOR YOU!!!!! ?;^ Q Speaking of garlic...I came across this recipe a few weeks ago. It is great, and not all that unhealthy if you use whole wheat linguine. Double the garlic. Pasta with Garlic Oil 1 lb. Linguine 1 cup extra virgin olive oil 4 cloves garlic (whole) 1/4 teaspoon dry hot chili pepper 1/4 cup flat leave parsley 1/2 teaspoon salt 1 teaspoon fresh ground black pepper Preparation Sauté garlic in olive oil, over medium heat until brown, remove, and reserve. Mash reserved garlic by using the back of a fork. Return mashed garlic to olive oil. Cook at high heat for 1 minute. Add dry chili pepper; cook for an additional minute. Add parsley and salt, cook 1 more minute. Add cooked linguine, toss well, arrange on heated serving dish, and sprinkle with black pepper. Serve without cheese please! [Note: Let the linguine drain well. You want it pretty dry so it will soak up the olive oil -- John H All decisions, even those of liberals, are the result of binary thinking. |
Hah!! Take that Darwin!!
On Sat, 03 Oct 2009 17:09:35 -0400, Gene
wrote: On Fri, 02 Oct 2009 12:21:28 -0400, JohnH wrote: On Fri, 02 Oct 2009 11:58:51 -0400, Gene wrote: On Fri, 02 Oct 2009 11:36:46 -0400, JohnH wrote: No, it's 2 for Intelligent Design. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PvLnHfw3cOo But, even the video admits, *someone or something* built the airplane. It didn't just 'happen'. http://www.venganza.org/about/open-letter/ Hah, so you give the Higher Power a new name. So what? *Someone* still built your airplane. It didn't just 'happen', did it? Do you think maybe a little wood, glue, rubber, plastic, paint, etc. just happened to fall from somewhere and accidentally land in that form? Go for it. -- John H All decisions, even those of liberals, are the result of binary thinking. |
Hah!! Take that Darwin!!
On Sat, 03 Oct 2009 17:29:38 -0400, Gene
wrote: On Fri, 02 Oct 2009 20:52:03 -0400, Tom Francis - SWSports wrote: The premise presented in that video is a false dichotomy by assuming that the person viewing the plane wouldn't ask the question of who made it. Well.... it certainly seemed to be a logical argument to John.... especially after he learned somebody built the airplane. Interesting to note that we are both brothers in Pastafarianism and that you don't seem so share our religion's proof that global warming has affected the number of pirates. Schism. :) May the warming noodly-fied light always shine on your shoulders. And unto you. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:13 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com