|
Third World poor breeding out of control - Time for First Worldto develop Fortress Mentality
On Sep 22, 6:17*am, wrote:
On Mon, 21 Sep 2009 18:17:59 -0700 (PDT), Iconoclast wrote: It doesn't take an "expert" to figure out that prosperous nations need to develop a fortress mentality before they are overwhelmed by Third World poor. http://www.breitbart.com/article.php...d35fc4f8355e56.... Population growth driving climate change, poverty: experts Sep 21 01:41 PM US/Eastern Unchecked population growth is speeding climate change, damaging life- nurturing ecosystems and dooming many countries to poverty, experts concluded in a conference report released Monday. Unless birth rates are lowered sharply through voluntary family- planning programmes and easy access to contraceptives, the tally of humans on Earth could swell to an unsustainable 11 billion by 2050, they warned. The UN currently projects that global population will rise from 6.8 billion today to between 8.0 and 10.5 billion by mid-century. The researchers said that with one and a half million more humans climbing aboard the planet every week, a recipe is looming for ecological overload, famine and broken states. "Continued rapid population growth in many of the least developed countries could lead to hunger, a failure of education and conflict," said Malcolm Potts at the University of California in Berkeley, which hosted the conference in February. The papers, authored by 42 specialists in environmental science, economics and demography, are published by the Royal Society, Britain's de-facto academy of sciences. "There is no doubt that the current rate of human population growth is unsustainable," summarised Roger Short, a professor at the University of Melbourne in Australia. "The inexorable increase in human numbers is exhausting conventional energy supplies, accelerating environmental pollution and global warming and providing an increasing number of failed states where civil unrest prevails." Ninety-eight percent of the expected population growth will occur in developing countries, especially in Africa, where numbers are set to double to almost two billion by 2050. "How Niger is going to feed a population growing from 11 million today to 50 million in 2050 in a semi-arid country that may be facing adverse climate (change) is unclear," said Adair Turner, a member of Britain's House of Lords. The population of Uganda was five million in 1950, is 25 million today and could reach 127 million by 2050, Turner said. Concern about population growth is not new. It was most famously articulated by a British mathematician, Thomas Malthus, who in 1798 -- when Earth was home to about one billion -- calculated that exponential growth would inevitably lead to famine. Malthus's dire warning was widely taken seriously until the advent of mechanised farming. The surge in food productivity, helped by the Green Revolution of the 1960s, gave the impression that Earth's bounty was limitless. But relentlessly rising demand, diminishing farmland, depleted fish stocks, falling water tables and the threat of climate change have in recent years placed the Malthusian dilemma back on the table. In their overview, the authors say that even though the burden of excess population is clear, controversy and taboo stalk the question of how to tackle it. Some objections, such as the Roman Catholic Church's ban on birth control, are religious. But the question has been ignored or sidelined in the secular arena too, the authors said. Population control, for example, did not figure among the UN's eight Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) in 2000, though it was added later "as an afterthought," said Short. One reason has been the family planning programmes in China and India that critics say veered into forced sterilisations and coercive abortions, breaching human rights. The researchers acknowledged these problems but also pointed out that without its "one-child" policy, China would have an extra 300 to 400 million mouths to feed today. There would be double the number of young people, from 20 to 40 million, who enter the Chinese job market each year. The researchers agreed with the widely held belief that improving economic conditions generally lead to lower birth rates. But, they argue, smaller families also lead to greater prosperity, and this can be helped by programmes that are voluntary and inexpensive. Some 80 million pregnancies -- nearly 40 percent of the total each year -- are unplanned. More than half of those unwanted pregnancies will result in abortion, with five million women suffering severe complications or death. "Much more emphasis need to be given to meeting the need for family planning -- all women should be protected from unintended childbirth," they said in a collective editorial. Copyright AFP 2008, AFP And Uncle Suckemoff keeps welcoming about 1 million legal immigrants a year!! ted http://www.wvwnews.net/*Western Voices- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Obama's next "push" will be amnesty for illegal aliens. tt |
Third World poor breeding out of control - Time for First Worldto develop Fortress Mentality
Why would the rest of us want to live in a "fortress" with assholes
like you? |
Third World poor breeding out of control - Time for First Worldto develop Fortress Mentality
On Sep 25, 8:40*am, Robert of St Louis wrote:
Why would the rest of us want to live in a "fortress" with assholes like you? maybe you'd rather live someplace like mexico or africa, with an abundance of third worlders Trav |
Third World poor breeding out of control - Time for First World to develop Fortress Mentality
Just answer a couple of questions because inquiring minds want to know- Is
it ok for the people in the rich, developed world, i.e. Westerns Europe (excluding of Portugal and probably Greece which are two undesirable countries in your frame of reference I would imagine), the United States and Canada (again excluding blacks, hispanics, native born indians, and immigrants from Africa and Asia), Japan, and possibly South Africa (again excluding anyone who is not of pure British or Afrikaner stock) to breed out of control? I would bet what's left of my 401k that you only want anyone with white skin, blond hair and blue eyes to breed like lemming so the world becomes as "pure" as you want it to be, right? And lastly, do you take off your jack boots and swastika at night or do you sleep with them on? -- meport "martin" wrote in message ... On Sep 22, 6:17 am, wrote: On Mon, 21 Sep 2009 18:17:59 -0700 (PDT), Iconoclast wrote: It doesn't take an "expert" to figure out that prosperous nations need to develop a fortress mentality before they are overwhelmed by Third World poor. http://www.breitbart.com/article.php...d35fc4f8355e56... Population growth driving climate change, poverty: experts Sep 21 01:41 PM US/Eastern Unchecked population growth is speeding climate change, damaging life- nurturing ecosystems and dooming many countries to poverty, experts concluded in a conference report released Monday. Unless birth rates are lowered sharply through voluntary family- planning programmes and easy access to contraceptives, the tally of humans on Earth could swell to an unsustainable 11 billion by 2050, they warned. The UN currently projects that global population will rise from 6.8 billion today to between 8.0 and 10.5 billion by mid-century. The researchers said that with one and a half million more humans climbing aboard the planet every week, a recipe is looming for ecological overload, famine and broken states. "Continued rapid population growth in many of the least developed countries could lead to hunger, a failure of education and conflict," said Malcolm Potts at the University of California in Berkeley, which hosted the conference in February. The papers, authored by 42 specialists in environmental science, economics and demography, are published by the Royal Society, Britain's de-facto academy of sciences. "There is no doubt that the current rate of human population growth is unsustainable," summarised Roger Short, a professor at the University of Melbourne in Australia. "The inexorable increase in human numbers is exhausting conventional energy supplies, accelerating environmental pollution and global warming and providing an increasing number of failed states where civil unrest prevails." Ninety-eight percent of the expected population growth will occur in developing countries, especially in Africa, where numbers are set to double to almost two billion by 2050. "How Niger is going to feed a population growing from 11 million today to 50 million in 2050 in a semi-arid country that may be facing adverse climate (change) is unclear," said Adair Turner, a member of Britain's House of Lords. The population of Uganda was five million in 1950, is 25 million today and could reach 127 million by 2050, Turner said. Concern about population growth is not new. It was most famously articulated by a British mathematician, Thomas Malthus, who in 1798 -- when Earth was home to about one billion -- calculated that exponential growth would inevitably lead to famine. Malthus's dire warning was widely taken seriously until the advent of mechanised farming. The surge in food productivity, helped by the Green Revolution of the 1960s, gave the impression that Earth's bounty was limitless. But relentlessly rising demand, diminishing farmland, depleted fish stocks, falling water tables and the threat of climate change have in recent years placed the Malthusian dilemma back on the table. In their overview, the authors say that even though the burden of excess population is clear, controversy and taboo stalk the question of how to tackle it. Some objections, such as the Roman Catholic Church's ban on birth control, are religious. But the question has been ignored or sidelined in the secular arena too, the authors said. Population control, for example, did not figure among the UN's eight Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) in 2000, though it was added later "as an afterthought," said Short. One reason has been the family planning programmes in China and India that critics say veered into forced sterilisations and coercive abortions, breaching human rights. The researchers acknowledged these problems but also pointed out that without its "one-child" policy, China would have an extra 300 to 400 million mouths to feed today. There would be double the number of young people, from 20 to 40 million, who enter the Chinese job market each year. The researchers agreed with the widely held belief that improving economic conditions generally lead to lower birth rates. But, they argue, smaller families also lead to greater prosperity, and this can be helped by programmes that are voluntary and inexpensive. Some 80 million pregnancies -- nearly 40 percent of the total each year -- are unplanned. More than half of those unwanted pregnancies will result in abortion, with five million women suffering severe complications or death. "Much more emphasis need to be given to meeting the need for family planning -- all women should be protected from unintended childbirth," they said in a collective editorial. Copyright AFP 2008, AFP And Uncle Suckemoff keeps welcoming about 1 million legal immigrants a year!! ted http://www.wvwnews.net/ Western Voices- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Obama's next "push" will be amnesty for illegal aliens. tt |
Third World poor breeding out of control - Time for First Worldto develop Fortress Mentality
Zombywoof wrote:
...those with the least resources do seem to replicate much more frequently then those with the ability to care for them do. *Perhaps it's because they have no other form of entertainment. The 3rd world areas were given advance medical tech, but none of the other techs necessary to support the increased population! It didn't develop that way in the 1st world countries! .. .. -- |
Third World poor breeding out of control - Time for First World to develop Fortress Mentality
Want a very interesting statistic? Western Europe, Japan, Russian, The good
'ol U S of A, Brazil and Canada, countries with a combined population of less than than 1,000,000,000 people, use almost 2 TIMES more of every natural resource, consume 3 TIMES more of the worlds production products, produce 2 TIMES more pollution and cause 5 TIMES more environmental degrogation than the rest of the world combined. In other words, 12% of the worlds population, THAT'S US, YOU AND ME, NOT THEM, are the ones who are causing the collapse of the world's biosystems. So who do you think THEY blame? And then we go around wondering why they hate US so much. -- meport "Zombywoof" wrote in message ... On Sat, 26 Sep 2009 07:53:52 -0400, "meport" wrote: Just answer a couple of questions because inquiring minds want to know- Is it ok for the people in the rich, developed world, i.e. Westerns Europe (excluding of Portugal and probably Greece which are two undesirable countries in your frame of reference I would imagine), the United States and Canada (again excluding blacks, hispanics, native born indians, and immigrants from Africa and Asia), Japan, and possibly South Africa (again excluding anyone who is not of pure British or Afrikaner stock) to breed out of control? I would bet what's left of my 401k that you only want anyone with white skin, blond hair and blue eyes to breed like lemming so the world becomes as "pure" as you want it to be, right? And lastly, do you take off your jack boots and swastika at night or do you sleep with them on? Well that may only be because of your biased views on the subject. For whatever reason those with the least resources do seem to replicate more of the same much more frequently then those with the ability to care for them do. Perhaps it is simply because they have no other form of entertainment. -- Alcohol, Tobacco, & Firearms should be aisles in a convenience store; not a Government agency! |
Third World poor breeding out of control - Time for First World to develop Fortress Mentality
"meport" wrote in message ... Want a very interesting statistic? Western Europe, Japan, Russian, The good 'ol U S of A, Brazil and Canada, countries with a combined population of less than than 1,000,000,000 people, use almost 2 TIMES more of every natural resource, consume 3 TIMES more of the worlds production products, produce 2 TIMES more pollution and cause 5 TIMES more environmental degrogation than the rest of the world combined. In other words, 12% of the worlds population, THAT'S US, YOU AND ME, NOT THEM, are the ones who are causing the collapse of the world's biosystems. So who do you think THEY blame? And then we go around wondering why they hate US so much. -- meport I sure know that when you see a video of a forest on fire for slash and burn farming, hydraulic gold mining, and mercury being used for all sorts of things, (and more), it ain't in the USA. Large third world cities with air quality similar to "London Fog" of the Industrial Revolution. We flew over what must have been a coal fired electric plant on our way to Mazatlan. I thought the forest was on fire. The smoke went to the horizon. No tree huggers in Mehico. But seriously, folks, in case you didn't know, or slept through history classes for decades, they hate us for interfering in their governments, and in some cases installing brutal figurehead tyrants. We revolted in those circumstances, and we didn't even have tyrants governing us who were murdering thousands of civilians every year for entertainment, dissent, or just because someone turned them in as "suspicious". That will create a hatred that will last forever. It's in them history books. Read them. What's that? You can't understand those big words and remember all those facts? sigh ..................... And how's that isolationist policy working so far, Sparky? Steve |
Third World poor breeding out of control - Time for First World to develop Fortress Mentality
David P. wrote
Zombywoof wrote ...those with the least resources do seem to replicate much more frequently then those with the ability to care for them do. Perhaps it's because they have no other form of entertainment. The 3rd world areas were given advance medical tech, but none of the other techs necessary to support the increased population! Mindlessly silly, most obviously with India and China which got those techs in spades. It didn't develop that way in the 1st world countries! Irrelevant to your stupid pig ignorant claim. |
Third World poor breeding out of control - Time for First Worldto develop Fortress Mentality
On Sep 27, 1:38*am, "meport" wrote:
Want a very interesting statistic? *Western Europe, Japan, Russian, The good 'ol U S of A, Brazil and Canada, countries with a combined population of less than than 1,000,000,000 people, use almost 2 TIMES more of every natural resource, consume 3 TIMES more of the worlds production products, produce 2 TIMES more pollution and cause 5 TIMES more environmental degrogation than the rest of the world combined. *In other words, 12% of the worlds population, THAT'S US, YOU AND ME, NOT THEM, are the ones who are causing the collapse of the world's biosystems. So who do you think THEY blame? *And then we go around wondering why they hate US so much. -- meport "Zombywoof" wrote in message ... Hahahahahahaha... thanks, always good to start the day with a good laugh. "they hate us" HAHAHAHAHA... BTW, I don't live in one of the above countries, so I guess I'm one of "them". I don't hate you, really. Think you're kind of silly, yes, but not hate. On Sat, 26 Sep 2009 07:53:52 -0400, "meport" wrote: Just answer a couple of questions because inquiring minds want to know- Is it ok for the people in the rich, developed world, i.e. Westerns Europe (excluding of Portugal and probably Greece which are two undesirable countries in your frame of reference I would imagine), the United States and Canada (again excluding blacks, hispanics, native born indians, and immigrants from Africa and Asia), Japan, and possibly South Africa (again excluding anyone who is not of pure British or Afrikaner stock) to breed out of control? I would bet what's left of my 401k that you only want anyone with white skin, blond hair and blue eyes to *breed like lemming so the world becomes as "pure" as you want it to be, right? *And lastly, do you take off your jack boots and swastika at night or do you sleep with them on? Well that may only be because of your biased views on the subject. For whatever reason those with the least resources do seem to replicate more of the same much more frequently then those with the ability to care for them do. *Perhaps it is simply because they have no other form of entertainment. -- Alcohol, Tobacco, & Firearms should be aisles in a convenience store; not a Government agency! |
Third World poor breeding out of control - Time for First Worldto develop Fortress Mentality
On Sep 26, 1:38*pm, "meport" wrote:
Want a very interesting statistic? *Western Europe, Japan, Russian, The good 'ol U S of A, Brazil and Canada, countries with a combined population of less than than 1,000,000,000 people, use almost 2 TIMES more of every natural resource, consume 3 TIMES more of the worlds production products, produce 2 TIMES more pollution and cause 5 TIMES more environmental degrogation than the rest of the world combined. *In other words, 12% of the worlds population, THAT'S US, YOU AND ME, NOT THEM, are the ones who are causing the collapse of the world's biosystems. So who do you think THEY blame? *And then we go around wondering why they hate US so much. the reason they hate us is because it's easier than trying to change their own corrupt govts. if you look at how much of the world's GDP is produced by those other countries, it's not much. we pollute more because we make more the rest of the world's corruption is masked by the 'hate america' ideology. it's like the pakistani who hates the US because he thinks we're waging a 'war on islam' rather than hating the terrorists in his own midst who cause the problem you need to stop believing cliches. |
Third World poor breeding out of control - Time for First Worldto develop Fortress Mentality
On Sep 26, 2:47*pm, "SteveB" wrote:
But seriously, folks, in case you didn't know, or slept through history classes for decades, they hate us for interfering in their governments we haven't interfered in govts for quite awhile. it's just an excuse to avoid having to deal with their own corrupt govts |
Third World poor breeding out of control - Time for First World to develop Fortress Mentality
meport wrote:
Want a very interesting statistic? Its no news. Western Europe, Japan, Russian, The good 'ol U S of A, Brazil and Canada, countries with a combined population of less than than 1,000,000,000 people, use almost 2 TIMES more of every natural resource, consume 3 TIMES more of the worlds production products, produce 2 TIMES more pollution and cause 5 TIMES more environmental degrogation than the rest of the world combined. Mindlessly superficial. You should be including India and China which produce a hell of a lot of those products and the pollution and the environmental degradation in spades. In other words, 12% of the worlds population, THAT'S US, YOU AND ME, NOT THEM, are the ones who are causing the collapse of the world's biosystems. That last is pure pig ignorant fantasy. In fact we have actually seen the exact opposite, nothing even remotely resembling anything like collapse of biosystems. We can now feed everyone in the entire world, something that wasnt possible just 50 years ago. So who do you think THEY blame? Who cares ? And then we go around wondering why they hate US so much. **** all in china and india are that stupid. Zombywoof wrote meport wrote Just answer a couple of questions because inquiring minds want to know- Is it ok for the people in the rich, developed world, i.e. Westerns Europe (excluding of Portugal and probably Greece which are two undesirable countries in your frame of reference I would imagine), the United States and Canada (again excluding blacks, hispanics, native born indians, and immigrants from Africa and Asia), Japan, and possibly South Africa (again excluding anyone who is not of pure British or Afrikaner stock) to breed out of control? I would bet what's left of my 401k that you only want anyone with white skin, blond hair and blue eyes to breed like lemming so the world becomes as "pure" as you want it to be, right? And lastly, do you take off your jack boots and swastika at night or do you sleep with them on? Well that may only be because of your biased views on the subject. For whatever reason those with the least resources do seem to replicate more of the same much more frequently then those with the ability to care for them do. Perhaps it is simply because they have no other form of entertainment. -- Alcohol, Tobacco, & Firearms should be aisles in a convenience store; not a Government agency! |
Third World poor breeding out of control - Time for First Worldto develop Fortress Mentality
"Rod Speed" wrote:
David P. wrote The 3rd world areas were given advance medical tech, but none of the other techs necessary to support the increased population! Mindlessly silly, most obviously with India and China which got those techs in spades. Not even possible to have 1st world quality tech support, so they'll stop overbreeding, he CIA World Factbook - GDP per capita Rank Country Int'l $ 80 World 10,400 81 Brazil 10,100 82 S Africa 10,000 83 Dominica 9,900 84 Montenegro 9,700 85 Cuba 9,500 Cook Islands 9,100 86 Azerbaijan 9,000 87 Macedonia 9,000 88 Colombia 8,900 89 Suriname 8,900 90 Angola 8,800 Anguilla 8,800 91 Belize 8,600 92 Thailand 8,500 93 Peru 8,400 94 Dominican R 8,100 95 Palau 8,100 Amer Samoa 8,000 96 Tunisia 7,900 97 Ecuador 7,500 98 Jamaica 7,400 99 Algeria 7,000 St Pierre Miq7,000 100 Ukraine 6,900 101 Bosnia Herz 6,500 102 Armenia 6,400 103 El Salvador 6,200 104 Turkmenistan6,100 105 Albania 6,000 106 China 6,000 Niue 5,800 107 Bhutan 5,600 108 Egypt 5,400 109 Namibia 5,400 110 Guatemala 5,200 111 Swaziland 5,100 112 Jordan 5,000 113 Maldives 5,000 114 Nauru 5,000 Mayotte 4,900 115 Samoa 4,900 116 Syria 4,800 117 Georgia 4,700 118 Tonga 4,600 119 Vanuatu 4,600 120 Bolivia 4,500 121 Honduras 4,400 122 Sri Lanka 4,300 123 Paraguay 4,200 124 Rep of Congo4,000 125 Iraq 4,000 126 Morocco 4,000 127 Fiji 3,900 128 Guyana 3,900 129 Indonesia 3,900 130 Cape Verde 3,800 WallisFutuna3,800 131 Djibouti 3,700 Montserrat 3,400 132 Philippines 3,200 133 Kiribati 3,200 134 Mongolia 3,200 135 Nicaragua 2,900 W Bank Gaza 2,900 136 India 2,800 137 Vietnam 2,800 138 Pakistan 2,600 139 Uzbekistan 2,600 140 Marshall I 2,500 141 Moldova 2,500 St Helena 2,500 W Sahara 2,500 142 Timor-Leste 2,400 143 Yemen 2,400 144 Cameroon 2,300 145 Kosovo 2,300 146 Nigeria 2,300 147 Micronesia 2,200 148 Papua N G 2,200 149 Sudan 2,200 150 Kyrgyzstan 2,100 151 Laos 2,100 152 Mauritania 2,100 153 Tajikistan 2,100 154 Cambodia 2,000 155 Solomon I 1,900 156 Ivory Coast 1,700 157 North Korea 1,700 158 Chad 1,600 159 Kenya 1,600 160 Lesotho 1,600 161 Senegal 1,600 162 Tuvalu 1,600 163 Bangladesh 1,500 164 Benin 1,500 165 Ghana 1,500 166 Zambia 1,500 167 Gambia 1,300 168 Haiti 1,300 169 Sγo Tomι+Pr 1,300 170 Tanzania 1,300 171 Burkina Faso1,200 172 Burma 1,200 173 Mali 1,200 174 Guinea 1,100 175 Nepal 1,100 176 Uganda 1,100 177 Comoros 1,000 178 Madagascar 1,000 Tokelau 1,000 179 Mozambique 900 180 Rwanda 900 181 Togo 900 182 Afghanistan 800 183 Ethiopia 800 184 Malawi 800 185 C Afr Rep 700 186 Eritrea 700 187 Niger 700 188 Sierra Leone700 189 Guinea-Biss 600 190 Somalia 600 191 Liberia 500 192 Burundi 400 193 D R of Congo300 194 Zimbabwe 200 It didn't develop that way in the 1st world countries! Irrelevant to your stupid pig ignorant claim. There's no precedent for a country developing to 1st world status (with the result of lower birth rate) without acquiring all techs (including banking, civil society, rule of law, democracy, equity markets, infrastructure, etc) more or less equally! .. .. -- |
Third World poor breeding out of control - Time for First World to develop Fortress Mentality
David P. wrote
Rod Speed wrote David P. wrote The 3rd world areas were given advance medical tech, but none of the other techs necessary to support the increased population! Mindlessly silly, most obviously with India and China which got those techs in spades. Not even possible to have 1st world quality tech support, so they'll stop overbreeding, he It wasnt 1st world quality tech support that stopped overbreeding in china, stupid. reams of irrelevant crap flushed where it belongs It didn't develop that way in the 1st world countries! Irrelevant to your stupid pig ignorant claim. There's no precedent for a country developing to 1st world status (with the result of lower birth rate) without acquiring all techs (including banking, civil society, rule of law, democracy, equity markets, infrastructure, etc) more or less equally! Irrelevant to your stupid pig ignorant claim. |
Third World poor breeding out of control - Time for First Worldto develop Fortress Mentality
"Rod Speed" wrote:
David P. wrote Rod Speed wrote David P. wrote The 3rd world areas were given advance medical tech, but none of the other techs necessary to support the increased population! Mindlessly silly, most obviously with India and China which got those techs in spades. Not even possible to have 1st world quality tech support, so they'll stop overbreeding, he It wasnt 1st world quality tech support that stopped overbreeding in china. They're STILL overpopulated, stupid! .. .. -- |
Third World poor breeding out of control - Time for First Worldto develop Fortress Mentality
On Sep 27, 7:36*am, "David P." wrote:
"Rod Speed" wrote: David P. wrote Rod Speed wrote David P. wrote The 3rd world areas were given advance medical tech, but none of the other techs necessary to support the increased population! Mindlessly silly, most obviously with India and China which got those techs in spades. Not even possible to have 1st world quality tech support, so they'll stop overbreeding, he It wasnt 1st world quality tech support that stopped overbreeding in china. They're STILL overpopulated, stupid! http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/China_water_crisis .. .. -- |
Third World poor breeding out of control - Time for First World to develop Fortress Mentality
David P. wrote
Rod Speed wrote David P. wrote Rod Speed wrote David P. wrote The 3rd world areas were given advance medical tech, but none of the other techs necessary to support the increased population! Mindlessly silly, most obviously with India and China which got those techs in spades. Not even possible to have 1st world quality tech support, so they'll stop overbreeding, he It wasnt 1st world quality tech support that stopped overbreeding in china. They're STILL overpopulated, stupid! They're doing their best to kill as many as they can by smoking furiously, cretin. They also kill lots on their roads and by polluting obscenely and by building houses and schools that collapse in earthquakes too. |
Third World poor breeding out of control - Time for First World to develop Fortress Mentality
David P. wrote
David P. wrote Rod Speed wrote David P. wrote Rod Speed wrote David P. wrote The 3rd world areas were given advance medical tech, but none of the other techs necessary to support the increased population! Mindlessly silly, most obviously with India and China which got those techs in spades. Not even possible to have 1st world quality tech support, so they'll stop overbreeding, he It wasnt 1st world quality tech support that stopped overbreeding in china. They're STILL overpopulated, stupid! http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/China_water_crisis They're killing as many off as fast as they can. Even India does that with their mindless rioting that kills quite large large numbers of people. Tho they did stop using that magnificent solution to the surplus mother in law problem, she goes on the funeral pyre with hubby, whether she wants to or not. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:22 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com