![]() |
Does Jimmy Carter read rec.boats?
From NBC's Mark Murray
In an interview with NBC's Brian Williams, former Democratic President Jimmy Carter attributed much of the conservative opposition that President Obama is receiving to the issue of race. "I think an overwhelming portion of the intensely demonstrated animosity toward President Barack Obama is based on the fact that he is a black man," Carter said. "I live in the South, and I've seen the South come a long way, and I've seen the rest of the country that share the South's attitude toward minority groups at that time, particularly African Americans." Carter continued, "And that racism inclination still exists. And I think it's bubbled up to the surface because of the belief among many white people, not just in the South but around the country, that African-Americans are not qualified to lead this great country. It's an abominable circumstance, and it grieves me and concerns me very deeply." -- President Carter...he must be reading herring, jack, justhate, DK, BAR and the rest of the right-wing bigots who populate this joint. Birther-Deather-Tenther-Teabagger: Idiots All |
Does Jimmy Carter read rec.boats?
On Sep 15, 9:13*pm, H the K wrote:
*From NBC's Mark Murray In an interview with NBC's Brian Williams, former Democratic President Jimmy Carter attributed much of the conservative opposition that President Obama is receiving to the issue of race. initially i didn't think this was true but i'm changing my mind...the hatred of obama, along with the idea that he's some alien communist sent to destroy america is so unbelieveable that no rational person would propose it. it must be based on race |
Does Jimmy Carter read rec.boats?
wf3h wrote:
On Sep 15, 9:13 pm, H the K wrote: From NBC's Mark Murray In an interview with NBC's Brian Williams, former Democratic President Jimmy Carter attributed much of the conservative opposition that President Obama is receiving to the issue of race. initially i didn't think this was true but i'm changing my mind...the hatred of obama, along with the idea that he's some alien communist sent to destroy america is so unbelieveable that no rational person would propose it. it must be based on race There's no other explanation for it. -- Birther-Deather-Tenther-Teabagger: Idiots All |
Does Jimmy Carter read rec.boats?
H the K wrote:
wf3h wrote: On Sep 15, 9:13 pm, H the K wrote: From NBC's Mark Murray In an interview with NBC's Brian Williams, former Democratic President Jimmy Carter attributed much of the conservative opposition that President Obama is receiving to the issue of race. initially i didn't think this was true but i'm changing my mind...the hatred of obama, along with the idea that he's some alien communist sent to destroy america is so unbelieveable that no rational person would propose it. it must be based on race There's no other explanation for it. Carter Cites 'Racism Inclination' in Animosity Toward Obama Visit msnbc.com for Breaking News, World News, and News about the Economy By Garance Franke-Ruta Former president Jimmy Carter told NBC's Brian Williams in an interview Tuesday that he believes race is at the core of much of the opposition to President Obama. "I think an overwhelming portion of the intensely demonstrated animosity toward President Barack Obama is based on the fact that he is a black man, that he's African American," Carter said. "I live in the South, and I've seen the South come a long way, and I've seen the rest of the country that shared the South's attitude toward minority groups at that time, particularly African Americans" Continued Carter, who is famously from Georgia: "And that racism inclination still exists. And I think it's bubbled up to the surface because of the belief among many white people, not just in the South but around the country, that African-Americans are not qualified to lead this great country. It's an abominable circumstance, and it grieves me and concerns me very deeply." Carter made the remarks in Atlanta. He was interviewed in connection with his 85th birthday; the network plans to air more from the interview later. The 39th president also predicted that Obama will be able to "triumph over the racist attitude that is the basis for the negative environment that we see so vividly demonstrated in public affairs in recent days." Posted at 9:08 PM ET on Sep 15, 2009 | Category: Culture Wars -- Birther-Deather-Tenther-Teabagger: Idiots All |
Does Jimmy Carter read rec.boats?
On Sep 15, 10:14*pm, H the K wrote:
wf3h wrote: On Sep 15, 9:13 pm, H the K wrote: *From NBC's Mark Murray In an interview with NBC's Brian Williams, former Democratic President Jimmy Carter attributed much of the conservative opposition that President Obama is receiving to the issue of race. initially i didn't think this was true but i'm changing my mind...the hatred of obama, along with the idea that he's some alien communist sent to destroy america is so unbelieveable that no rational person would propose it. it must be based on race There's no other explanation for it. -- Birther-Deather-Tenther-Teabagger: Idiots All He's a sock-puppet, controlled by those hiding in the wings.... Something like a lot of the posters here........ |
Does Jimmy Carter read rec.boats?
On Sep 15, 9:32*pm, wf3h wrote:
On Sep 15, 9:13*pm, H the K wrote: *From NBC's Mark Murray In an interview with NBC's Brian Williams, former Democratic President Jimmy Carter attributed much of the conservative opposition that President Obama is receiving to the issue of race. initially i didn't think this was true but i'm changing my mind...the hatred of obama, along with the idea that he's some alien communist sent to destroy america is so unbelieveable that no rational person would propose it. it must be based on race Poor old Carter is an old man, and hasn't come along with the rest of the country. He hasn't gotten over the rabbit attack? ~snerk~ Then can you say "stagflation"? |
Does Jimmy Carter read rec.boats?
"H the K" wrote in message
m... From NBC's Mark Murray In an interview with NBC's Brian Williams, former Democratic President Jimmy Carter attributed much of the conservative opposition that President Obama is receiving to the issue of race. "I think an overwhelming portion of the intensely demonstrated animosity toward President Barack Obama is based on the fact that he is a black man," Carter said. "I live in the South, and I've seen the South come a long way, and I've seen the rest of the country that share the South's attitude toward minority groups at that time, particularly African Americans." Carter continued, "And that racism inclination still exists. And I think it's bubbled up to the surface because of the belief among many white people, not just in the South but around the country, that African-Americans are not qualified to lead this great country. It's an abominable circumstance, and it grieves me and concerns me very deeply." -- President Carter...he must be reading herring, jack, justhate, DK, BAR and the rest of the right-wing bigots who populate this joint. I definitely think a lot of it is racism. Just look at the signs displayed in the rally in DC... I certainly acknowledge that Bush got treated to signs comparing him to Hitler, but I don't believe any of them made reference to his race. I also think that a lot of it is more of a fear-based reaction than out and out racism... white good/black bad. Obama is an unknown to lots and lots of people.. unknown in the sense that some have never had a black man or women be in charge of directly affecting their lives, and they're afraid. The really disturbing part is the promoting of these feelings of fear and uncertainty by "news services" such as Fox and Dick Army's Freedomworks. Both of these groups know better. They should be ashamed of themselves. -- Nom=de=Plume |
Does Jimmy Carter read rec.boats?
"Jack" wrote in message
... On Sep 15, 9:32 pm, wf3h wrote: On Sep 15, 9:13 pm, H the K wrote: From NBC's Mark Murray In an interview with NBC's Brian Williams, former Democratic President Jimmy Carter attributed much of the conservative opposition that President Obama is receiving to the issue of race. initially i didn't think this was true but i'm changing my mind...the hatred of obama, along with the idea that he's some alien communist sent to destroy america is so unbelieveable that no rational person would propose it. it must be based on race Poor old Carter is an old man, and hasn't come along with the rest of the country. He hasn't gotten over the rabbit attack? ~snerk~ Then can you say "stagflation"? Sounds like Democrat-rationale to me. -- Nom=de=Plume |
Does Jimmy Carter read rec.boats?
wrote in message
... On Tue, 15 Sep 2009 21:13:11 -0400, H the K wrote: From NBC's Mark Murray In an interview with NBC's Brian Williams, former Democratic President Jimmy Carter attributed much of the conservative opposition that President Obama is receiving to the issue of race. "I think an overwhelming portion of the intensely demonstrated animosity toward President Barack Obama is based on the fact that he is a black man," Carter said. "I live in the South, and I've seen the South come a long way, and I've seen the rest of the country that share the South's attitude toward minority groups at that time, particularly African Americans." Carter continued, "And that racism inclination still exists. And I think it's bubbled up to the surface because of the belief among many white people, not just in the South but around the country, that African-Americans are not qualified to lead this great country. It's an abominable circumstance, and it grieves me and concerns me very deeply." Are the black tea baggers racist too? I saw plenty of them in the pictures from DC. So, what you're saying is that because someone is black that gives them extra authority about the president? FYI, you might want to rethink the use of the term "tea bagger." It's kinda become a joke. In any case, what I'm not seeing much of is a legitimate discussion about the various parts of the bills (those we know about such as HR 3200). When Clinton was trying to get healthcare reform through Congress, she was, of course, pilloried by the right, but interestingly the attacks were about the actual contents of the proposed legislation. These days, the attacks are about things that aren't in the bills, about Obama's race, and about things that have nothing much to do with healthcare reform. I can't help thinking that there must be a reason for the difference. -- Nom=de=Plume |
Does Jimmy Carter read rec.boats?
On Tue, 15 Sep 2009 20:31:24 -0700 (PDT), Jack
wrote: snipped for context He hasn't gotten over the rabbit attack? That's why he only reads about boating now. -- Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service -------http://www.NewsDemon.com------ Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access |
Does Jimmy Carter read rec.boats?
On Tue, 15 Sep 2009 21:46:42 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote: "H the K" wrote in message om... From NBC's Mark Murray In an interview with NBC's Brian Williams, former Democratic President Jimmy Carter attributed much of the conservative opposition that President Obama is receiving to the issue of race. snipped for brevity I also think that a lot of it is more of a fear-based reaction than out and out racism... white good/black bad. Obama is an unknown to lots and lots of people.. unknown in the sense that some have never had a black man or women be in charge of directly affecting their lives, and they're afraid. The really disturbing part is the promoting of these feelings of fear and uncertainty by "news services" such as Fox and Dick Army's Freedomworks. Both of these groups know better. They should be ashamed of themselves. There's no reason to insult the sensibilities of on concerned Americans with untenable speculation. You are right in that in as much as the anxiety produced by the apparent path the country is taking could be described as fear by less discerning persons, the description fails to acknowledge legitimate concerns of those persons who have their sensibilities assaulted, too, by statements such as this; "One-party autocracy certainly has its drawbacks. But when it is led by a reasonably enlightened group of people, as China is today, it can also have great advantages," written by Tom Friedman for the NYT. The obvious that smacks the 'enlightened' reader pugilistically between the eyes is that any one-party rule is an open invitation for the induction of a narcissitic Nero who may, on a whim, blithely pin ne'er-do-wells to trees, coat with wax, and set afire to serve as improvised night lights. If the autocrat can be enlightened the autocrat can be debauch. But, this is just one of many scenarios that has given rise to civil angst. To posit an argument that hinges on the 'puerile' fears of a few citizens is to criminally deprecate the wide-spread, warranted hand-wringing over profligate spending by our "enlightened" legates and imperators. And if one decides that the felonious argument should trump all other arguments, one can pull out the Michael Moore rabbit of an argument out of the hat and flippantly offer, "You really think that's ever going to happen?" Can history ever serve as the example? -- Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service -------http://www.NewsDemon.com------ Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access |
Does Jimmy Carter read rec.boats?
wrote Are the black tea baggers racist too? I saw plenty of them in the pictures from DC. I don't think there's a word in our language for a black racist, is there? Steve |
Does Jimmy Carter read rec.boats?
On Sep 15, 11:19*pm, Scott Dickson wrote:
On Sep 15, 10:14*pm, H the K wrote: wf3h wrote: On Sep 15, 9:13 pm, H the K wrote: *From NBC's Mark Murray In an interview with NBC's Brian Williams, former Democratic President Jimmy Carter attributed much of the conservative opposition that President Obama is receiving to the issue of race. initially i didn't think this was true but i'm changing my mind...the hatred of obama, along with the idea that he's some alien communist sent to destroy america is so unbelieveable that no rational person would propose it. it must be based on race There's no other explanation for it. -- Birther-Deather-Tenther-Teabagger: Idiots All He's a sock-puppet, controlled by those hiding in the wings.... Something like a lot of the posters here and george bush was a model of independent thinking... uh huh. |
Does Jimmy Carter read rec.boats?
On Sep 15, 11:31*pm, Jack wrote:
On Sep 15, 9:32*pm, wf3h wrote: On Sep 15, 9:13*pm, H the K wrote: *From NBC's Mark Murray In an interview with NBC's Brian Williams, former Democratic President Jimmy Carter attributed much of the conservative opposition that President Obama is receiving to the issue of race. initially i didn't think this was true but i'm changing my mind...the hatred of obama, along with the idea that he's some alien communist sent to destroy america is so unbelieveable that no rational person would propose it. it must be based on race Poor old Carter is an old man, and hasn't come along with the rest of the country. *He hasn't gotten over the rabbit attack? * carter's not the only one saying it. |
Does Jimmy Carter read rec.boats?
On Sep 16, 12:46*am, "nom=de=plume" wrote:
"H the K" wrote in messagenews:2LmdnfhTW506pi3XnZ2dnUVZ_qmdnZ2d@earth link.com... From NBC's Mark Murray In an interview with NBC's Brian Williams, former Democratic President Jimmy Carter attributed much of the conservative opposition that President Obama is receiving to the issue of race. "I think an overwhelming portion of the intensely demonstrated animosity toward President Barack Obama is based on the fact that he is a black man," Carter said. "I live in the South, and I've seen the South come a long way, and I've seen the rest of the country that share the South's attitude toward minority groups at that time, particularly African Americans." Carter continued, "And that racism inclination still exists. And I think it's bubbled up to the surface because of the belief among many white people, not just in the South but around the country, that African-Americans are not qualified to lead this great country. It's an abominable circumstance, and it grieves me and concerns me very deeply." -- President Carter...he must be reading herring, jack, justhate, DK, BAR and the rest of the right-wing bigots who populate this joint. I definitely think a lot of it is racism. Just look at the signs displayed in the rally in DC... I certainly acknowledge that Bush got treated to signs comparing him to Hitler, but I don't believe any of them made reference to his race. and the comment by southerners like saxby chambliss that obama should show some 'humility'...as someone asked, would a white southerner say that to a white president? |
Does Jimmy Carter read rec.boats?
wf3h wrote:
On Sep 15, 11:19 pm, Scott Dickson wrote: On Sep 15, 10:14 pm, H the K wrote: wf3h wrote: On Sep 15, 9:13 pm, H the K wrote: From NBC's Mark Murray In an interview with NBC's Brian Williams, former Democratic President Jimmy Carter attributed much of the conservative opposition that President Obama is receiving to the issue of race. initially i didn't think this was true but i'm changing my mind...the hatred of obama, along with the idea that he's some alien communist sent to destroy america is so unbelieveable that no rational person would propose it. it must be based on race There's no other explanation for it. -- Birther-Deather-Tenther-Teabagger: Idiots All He's a sock-puppet, controlled by those hiding in the wings.... Something like a lot of the posters here and george bush was a model of independent thinking... uh huh. I'm sure Joe Wilson's motivations are as pure as the driven snow. In 2003, Addison "Joe" Wilson, a protegé of Sen. Strom Thurmond, publicly criticized Essie Mae Washington-Williams (the daughter of the Thurmond’s 16-year old African-American servant) when she revealed that Strom Thurmond was her genetic father. Wilson said even if her story was true, she should not have revealed it because "it's a smear" on Thurmond's image and was a way to "diminish" Thurmond's legacy.]After Thurmond's family acknowledged the truth of Washington-Williams' revelation, Wilson apologized but said that he still thought that she should not have revealed that Thurmond was her father. Congressman Wilson is cautious when he makes public remarks: On a 2002 live broadcast of the C-SPAN talk show Washington Journal, guests Wilson and Democratic congressman Bob Filner were discussing Iraqi weapons of mass destruction. When Filner said that the US "gave" Iraq "chemical and biological weapons" in the 1980s, Wilson said this idea was "made up" and commented to Filner "This hatred of America by some people is just outrageous. And you need to get over that." Wilson apologized for his remarks in statements to the press. Wilson is or was active in the Sons of Confederate Veterans, which used to be an honorable organization for the descendants of those who fought on the south's side in the Civil War and who wanted to preserve that history, but now has deteriorated into to a politicized organization dedicated to preserving the "Lost Cause" version of the history of the Civil War and the 1861-1865 era. The SCV states that "[t]he preservation of liberty and freedom was the motivating factor in the South's decision to fight the Second American Revolution". Some references swiped from wiki Imagine "sticking up" for a p.o.s. like Strom Thurmond. -- Birther-Deather-Tenther-Teabagger: Idiots All |
Does Jimmy Carter read rec.boats?
On Sep 16, 1:46*am, wrote:
On Tue, 15 Sep 2009 21:46:42 -0700, "nom=de=plume" The really disturbing part is the promoting of these feelings of fear and uncertainty by "news services" such as Fox and Dick Army's Freedomworks. Both of these groups know better. They should be ashamed of themselves. There's no reason to insult the sensibilities of on concerned Americans with untenable speculation. *You are right in that in as much as the anxiety produced by the apparent path the country is taking could be described as fear by less discerning persons, the description fails to acknowledge legitimate concerns of those persons who have their sensibilities assaulted, too, by statements such as this; "One-party autocracy certainly has its drawbacks. But when it is led by a reasonably enlightened group of people, as China is today, it can also have great advantages," written by Tom Friedman for the NYT. tom friedman isn't barack obama. and the signs carried by folks, like in the recent rally in washington, saying that obama's some alien communist atheist america hating...well you get the picture... The obvious that smacks the 'enlightened' reader pugilistically between the eyes is that any one-party rule and the GOP had one party rule in this country for so long, it's driven them crazy to even conceptualize the idea there could be another party in power...so they think power was grabbed, not legitimately transferred is an open invitation for the induction of a narcissitic Nero who may, on a whim, blithely pin ne'er-do-wells to trees, coat with wax, and set afire to serve as improvised night lights. *If the autocrat can be enlightened the autocrat can be debauch. *But, this is just one of many scenarios that has given rise to civil angst. *To posit an argument that hinges on the 'puerile' fears of a few citizens is to criminally deprecate the wide-spread, warranted hand-wringing over profligate spending by our "enlightened" legates and imperators. the biggest spenders in US history were ronald reagan and george w. bush. where was the outrage when they busted the budget? |
Does Jimmy Carter read rec.boats?
wf3h wrote:
On Sep 15, 11:31 pm, Jack wrote: On Sep 15, 9:32 pm, wf3h wrote: On Sep 15, 9:13 pm, H the K wrote: From NBC's Mark Murray In an interview with NBC's Brian Williams, former Democratic President Jimmy Carter attributed much of the conservative opposition that President Obama is receiving to the issue of race. initially i didn't think this was true but i'm changing my mind...the hatred of obama, along with the idea that he's some alien communist sent to destroy america is so unbelieveable that no rational person would propose it. it must be based on race Poor old Carter is an old man, and hasn't come along with the rest of the country. He hasn't gotten over the rabbit attack? carter's not the only one saying it. If I were a racist who lived in South Carolina like our boy Jack here, I'd also be on the defensive... -- Birther-Deather-Tenther-Teabagger: Idiots All |
Does Jimmy Carter read rec.boats?
On Sep 16, 7:44*am, H the K wrote:
Some references swiped from wiki Imagine "sticking up" for a p.o.s. like Strom Thurmond. -- wow. didn't know that. it just keeps getting better and better. the GOP truly is a party of embittered, angry old white southerners. |
Does Jimmy Carter read rec.boats?
On Wed, 16 Sep 2009 04:47:42 -0700 (PDT), wf3h
wrote: On Sep 16, 1:46*am, wrote: On Tue, 15 Sep 2009 21:46:42 -0700, "nom=de=plume" snipped for brevity the biggest spenders in US history were ronald reagan and george w. bush. where was the outrage when they busted the budget? Got up on the wrong side of a reasoned discourse this morning? "House Speaker Thomas O'Neill (D., Mass.), who had tried to offset the President's personal pulling power with some tough political talk of his own, said after the vote that "the monkey is off the Democrat's back. The federal budget cuts, as brutal as they are, are Reagan's cuts." Toledo Blade, May 8th, 1981 -- Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service -------http://www.NewsDemon.com------ Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access |
Does Jimmy Carter read rec.boats?
On Tue, 15 Sep 2009 21:47:33 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote: "Jack" wrote in message ... On Sep 15, 9:32 pm, wf3h wrote: On Sep 15, 9:13 pm, H the K wrote: From NBC's Mark Murray In an interview with NBC's Brian Williams, former Democratic President Jimmy Carter attributed much of the conservative opposition that President Obama is receiving to the issue of race. initially i didn't think this was true but i'm changing my mind...the hatred of obama, along with the idea that he's some alien communist sent to destroy america is so unbelieveable that no rational person would propose it. it must be based on race Poor old Carter is an old man, and hasn't come along with the rest of the country. He hasn't gotten over the rabbit attack? ~snerk~ Then can you say "stagflation"? Sounds like Democrat-rationale to me. It sounds like anyone who doesn't want to live in a socialist country is automatically a racist. What horse****. But as soon as Carter made his bull**** pronouncements yesterday, I knew you liberals would be on it like stink on that smelly stuff. Maybe that's another analogy you don't get. -- John H |
Does Jimmy Carter read rec.boats?
On Tue, 15 Sep 2009 21:53:03 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote: wrote in message .. . On Tue, 15 Sep 2009 21:13:11 -0400, H the K wrote: From NBC's Mark Murray In an interview with NBC's Brian Williams, former Democratic President Jimmy Carter attributed much of the conservative opposition that President Obama is receiving to the issue of race. "I think an overwhelming portion of the intensely demonstrated animosity toward President Barack Obama is based on the fact that he is a black man," Carter said. "I live in the South, and I've seen the South come a long way, and I've seen the rest of the country that share the South's attitude toward minority groups at that time, particularly African Americans." Carter continued, "And that racism inclination still exists. And I think it's bubbled up to the surface because of the belief among many white people, not just in the South but around the country, that African-Americans are not qualified to lead this great country. It's an abominable circumstance, and it grieves me and concerns me very deeply." Are the black tea baggers racist too? I saw plenty of them in the pictures from DC. So, what you're saying is that because someone is black that gives them extra authority about the president? FYI, you might want to rethink the use of the term "tea bagger." It's kinda become a joke. In any case, what I'm not seeing much of is a legitimate discussion about the various parts of the bills (those we know about such as HR 3200). When Clinton was trying to get healthcare reform through Congress, she was, of course, pilloried by the right, but interestingly the attacks were about the actual contents of the proposed legislation. These days, the attacks are about things that aren't in the bills, about Obama's race, and about things that have nothing much to do with healthcare reform. I can't help thinking that there must be a reason for the difference. Pure drivel. -- John H |
Does Jimmy Carter read rec.boats?
On Tue, 15 Sep 2009 21:46:42 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote: "H the K" wrote in message om... From NBC's Mark Murray In an interview with NBC's Brian Williams, former Democratic President Jimmy Carter attributed much of the conservative opposition that President Obama is receiving to the issue of race. "I think an overwhelming portion of the intensely demonstrated animosity toward President Barack Obama is based on the fact that he is a black man," Carter said. "I live in the South, and I've seen the South come a long way, and I've seen the rest of the country that share the South's attitude toward minority groups at that time, particularly African Americans." Carter continued, "And that racism inclination still exists. And I think it's bubbled up to the surface because of the belief among many white people, not just in the South but around the country, that African-Americans are not qualified to lead this great country. It's an abominable circumstance, and it grieves me and concerns me very deeply." -- President Carter...he must be reading herring, jack, justhate, DK, BAR and the rest of the right-wing bigots who populate this joint. I definitely think a lot of it is racism. Just look at the signs displayed in the rally in DC... I certainly acknowledge that Bush got treated to signs comparing him to Hitler, but I don't believe any of them made reference to his race. I also think that a lot of it is more of a fear-based reaction than out and out racism... white good/black bad. Obama is an unknown to lots and lots of people.. unknown in the sense that some have never had a black man or women be in charge of directly affecting their lives, and they're afraid. The really disturbing part is the promoting of these feelings of fear and uncertainty by "news services" such as Fox and Dick Army's Freedomworks. Both of these groups know better. They should be ashamed of themselves. More drivel. -- John H |
Does Jimmy Carter read rec.boats?
On Sep 16, 12:42*pm, wrote:
On Wed, 16 Sep 2009 04:47:42 -0700 (PDT), wf3h wrote: On Sep 16, 1:46*am, wrote: On Tue, 15 Sep 2009 21:46:42 -0700, "nom=de=plume" snipped for brevity the biggest spenders in US history were ronald reagan and george w. bush. where was the outrage when they busted the budget? Got up on the wrong side of a reasoned discourse this morning? "House Speaker Thomas O'Neill (D., Mass.), who had tried to offset the President's personal pulling power with some tough political talk of his own, said after the vote that "the monkey is off the Democrat's back. *The federal budget cuts, as brutal as they are, are Reagan's cuts." Toledo Blade, May 8th, 1981 unfortunately for your distorted view of history, the right wing 'cato institute' agrees with me: http://www.cato.org/pub_display.php?pub_id=3750 President Bush has presided over the largest overall increase in inflation-adjusted federal spending since Lyndon B. Johnson. Even after excluding spending on defense and homeland security, Bush is still the biggest-spending president in 30 years and for a longer view, the biggest budget busters have been republicans: http://findarticles.com/p/articles/m...6/ai_20409139/ Over the last 100 years, of the five presidents who reigned over the largest domestic spending growth, four were Republicans. Taken in order of expenditures, they were Richard Nixon, Herbert Hoover, Dwight Eisenhower, Harry S. Truman (the lone Democrat), and George Bush. and for a view of presidents and budget deficits, check http://jimbuie.blogs.com/photos/unca...art_2006_2.gif to see what a BIG spender reagan was compared to clinton. now, right winger, go read. you might learn something |
Does Jimmy Carter read rec.boats?
On Wed, 16 Sep 2009 10:22:30 -0700 (PDT), wf3h
wrote: On Sep 16, 12:42*pm, wrote: On Wed, 16 Sep 2009 04:47:42 -0700 (PDT), wf3h wrote: On Sep 16, 1:46*am, wrote: On Tue, 15 Sep 2009 21:46:42 -0700, "nom=de=plume" snipped for brevity the biggest spenders in US history were ronald reagan and george w. bush. where was the outrage when they busted the budget? Got up on the wrong side of a reasoned discourse this morning? "House Speaker Thomas O'Neill (D., Mass.), who had tried to offset the President's personal pulling power with some tough political talk of his own, said after the vote that "the monkey is off the Democrat's back. *The federal budget cuts, as brutal as they are, are Reagan's cuts." Toledo Blade, May 8th, 1981 unfortunately for your distorted view of history, the right wing 'cato institute' agrees with me: http://www.cato.org/pub_display.php?pub_id=3750 President Bush has presided over the largest overall increase in inflation-adjusted federal spending since Lyndon B. Johnson. Even after excluding spending on defense and homeland security, Bush is still the biggest-spending president in 30 years and for a longer view, the biggest budget busters have been republicans: http://findarticles.com/p/articles/m...6/ai_20409139/ Over the last 100 years, of the five presidents who reigned over the largest domestic spending growth, four were Republicans. Taken in order of expenditures, they were Richard Nixon, Herbert Hoover, Dwight Eisenhower, Harry S. Truman (the lone Democrat), and George Bush. and for a view of presidents and budget deficits, check http://jimbuie.blogs.com/photos/unca...art_2006_2.gif to see what a BIG spender reagan was compared to clinton. now, right winger, go read. you might learn something May the gentle reader please note, if one is disposed to an honest scrutiny of the discourse, that this particular thread has devolved from a discussion of what impels and compels those who object to the ostensible, inexorable, oppression through legislation by government and a recognition of the use of the strawman argument of racism applied to those very objectors. My commentary was not read carefully by this particular antagonist as this antagonist launched into his standard rigamarole of "busted budgets" and whatever that is supposed to suggest. The lack of an apprehensible commentary on his or her part is best illustrated in the use of the ad hominem "right winger," which is applied through vacuous presupposition and palpable angst. -- Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service -------http://www.NewsDemon.com------ Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access |
Does Jimmy Carter read rec.boats?
"JohnH" wrote in message
... On Tue, 15 Sep 2009 21:47:33 -0700, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "Jack" wrote in message ... On Sep 15, 9:32 pm, wf3h wrote: On Sep 15, 9:13 pm, H the K wrote: From NBC's Mark Murray In an interview with NBC's Brian Williams, former Democratic President Jimmy Carter attributed much of the conservative opposition that President Obama is receiving to the issue of race. initially i didn't think this was true but i'm changing my mind...the hatred of obama, along with the idea that he's some alien communist sent to destroy america is so unbelieveable that no rational person would propose it. it must be based on race Poor old Carter is an old man, and hasn't come along with the rest of the country. He hasn't gotten over the rabbit attack? ~snerk~ Then can you say "stagflation"? Sounds like Democrat-rationale to me. It sounds like anyone who doesn't want to live in a socialist country is automatically a racist. It sounds like you need to get out more. We have lots of social programs in the country, and I for one, am glad we do. What horse****. But as soon as Carter made his bull**** pronouncements yesterday, I knew you liberals would be on it like stink on that smelly stuff. Maybe that's another analogy you don't get. Maybe you should get over the fact that FDR is dead. -- Nom=de=Plume |
Does Jimmy Carter read rec.boats?
"JohnH" wrote in message
... On Tue, 15 Sep 2009 21:53:03 -0700, "nom=de=plume" wrote: wrote in message . .. On Tue, 15 Sep 2009 21:13:11 -0400, H the K wrote: From NBC's Mark Murray In an interview with NBC's Brian Williams, former Democratic President Jimmy Carter attributed much of the conservative opposition that President Obama is receiving to the issue of race. "I think an overwhelming portion of the intensely demonstrated animosity toward President Barack Obama is based on the fact that he is a black man," Carter said. "I live in the South, and I've seen the South come a long way, and I've seen the rest of the country that share the South's attitude toward minority groups at that time, particularly African Americans." Carter continued, "And that racism inclination still exists. And I think it's bubbled up to the surface because of the belief among many white people, not just in the South but around the country, that African-Americans are not qualified to lead this great country. It's an abominable circumstance, and it grieves me and concerns me very deeply." Are the black tea baggers racist too? I saw plenty of them in the pictures from DC. So, what you're saying is that because someone is black that gives them extra authority about the president? FYI, you might want to rethink the use of the term "tea bagger." It's kinda become a joke. In any case, what I'm not seeing much of is a legitimate discussion about the various parts of the bills (those we know about such as HR 3200). When Clinton was trying to get healthcare reform through Congress, she was, of course, pilloried by the right, but interestingly the attacks were about the actual contents of the proposed legislation. These days, the attacks are about things that aren't in the bills, about Obama's race, and about things that have nothing much to do with healthcare reform. I can't help thinking that there must be a reason for the difference. Pure drivel. -- John H Purely accurate... but feel free to continue to deny it. -- Nom=de=Plume |
Does Jimmy Carter read rec.boats?
nom=de=plume wrote:
"JohnH" wrote in message ... On Tue, 15 Sep 2009 21:47:33 -0700, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "Jack" wrote in message ... On Sep 15, 9:32 pm, wf3h wrote: On Sep 15, 9:13 pm, H the K wrote: From NBC's Mark Murray In an interview with NBC's Brian Williams, former Democratic President Jimmy Carter attributed much of the conservative opposition that President Obama is receiving to the issue of race. initially i didn't think this was true but i'm changing my mind...the hatred of obama, along with the idea that he's some alien communist sent to destroy america is so unbelieveable that no rational person would propose it. it must be based on race Poor old Carter is an old man, and hasn't come along with the rest of the country. He hasn't gotten over the rabbit attack? ~snerk~ Then can you say "stagflation"? Sounds like Democrat-rationale to me. It sounds like anyone who doesn't want to live in a socialist country is automatically a racist. It sounds like you need to get out more. We have lots of social programs in the country, and I for one, am glad we do. What horse****. But as soon as Carter made his bull**** pronouncements yesterday, I knew you liberals would be on it like stink on that smelly stuff. Maybe that's another analogy you don't get. Maybe you should get over the fact that FDR is dead. President Carter called out the Republican racists, and that includes JohnH(erring) here. -- Birther-Deather-Tenther-Teabagger: Idiots All |
Does Jimmy Carter read rec.boats?
wrote in message
... On Tue, 15 Sep 2009 21:46:42 -0700, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "H the K" wrote in message news:2LmdnfhTW506pi3XnZ2dnUVZ_qmdnZ2d@earthlink. com... From NBC's Mark Murray In an interview with NBC's Brian Williams, former Democratic President Jimmy Carter attributed much of the conservative opposition that President Obama is receiving to the issue of race. snipped for brevity I also think that a lot of it is more of a fear-based reaction than out and out racism... white good/black bad. Obama is an unknown to lots and lots of people.. unknown in the sense that some have never had a black man or women be in charge of directly affecting their lives, and they're afraid. The really disturbing part is the promoting of these feelings of fear and uncertainty by "news services" such as Fox and Dick Army's Freedomworks. Both of these groups know better. They should be ashamed of themselves. There's no reason to insult the sensibilities of on concerned Americans with untenable speculation. Where did I do that? Dick Army?? He's a paid shill for big pharma. You are right in that in as much as the anxiety produced by the apparent path the country is taking could be described as fear by less discerning persons, the description fails to acknowledge legitimate concerns of those persons who have their sensibilities assaulted, too, by statements such as this; "One-party autocracy certainly has its drawbacks. But when it is led by a reasonably enlightened group of people, as China is today, it can also have great advantages," written by Tom Friedman for the NYT. So, Friedman is not allowed to state his views? Have you read any of his books? The obvious that smacks the 'enlightened' reader pugilistically between the eyes is that any one-party rule is an open invitation for the induction of a narcissitic Nero who may, on a whim, blithely pin ne'er-do-wells to trees, coat with wax, and set afire to serve as improvised night lights. If the autocrat can be enlightened the autocrat can be debauch. But, this is just one of many scenarios that has given rise to civil angst. To posit an argument that hinges on the 'puerile' fears of a few citizens is to criminally deprecate the wide-spread, warranted hand-wringing over profligate spending by our "enlightened" legates and imperators. And if one decides that the felonious argument should trump all other arguments, one can pull out the Michael Moore rabbit of an argument out of the hat and flippantly offer, "You really think that's ever going to happen?" Can history ever serve as the example? This sounds like a rant. I'll just let it stand without further comment. -- Nom=de=Plume |
Does Jimmy Carter read rec.boats?
On Wed, 16 Sep 2009 11:47:23 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote: wrote in message .. . On Tue, 15 Sep 2009 21:46:42 -0700, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "H the K" wrote in message news:2LmdnfhTW506pi3XnZ2dnUVZ_qmdnZ2d@earthlink .com... From NBC's Mark Murray In an interview with NBC's Brian Williams, former Democratic President Jimmy Carter attributed much of the conservative opposition that President Obama is receiving to the issue of race. snipped for brevity I also think that a lot of it is more of a fear-based reaction than out and out racism... white good/black bad. Obama is an unknown to lots and lots of people.. unknown in the sense that some have never had a black man or women be in charge of directly affecting their lives, and they're afraid. The really disturbing part is the promoting of these feelings of fear and uncertainty by "news services" such as Fox and Dick Army's Freedomworks. Both of these groups know better. They should be ashamed of themselves. There's no reason to insult the sensibilities of on concerned Americans with untenable speculation. Where did I do that? Dick Army?? He's a paid shill for big pharma. You are right in that in as much as the anxiety produced by the apparent path the country is taking could be described as fear by less discerning persons, the description fails to acknowledge legitimate concerns of those persons who have their sensibilities assaulted, too, by statements such as this; "One-party autocracy certainly has its drawbacks. But when it is led by a reasonably enlightened group of people, as China is today, it can also have great advantages," written by Tom Friedman for the NYT. So, Friedman is not allowed to state his views? Have you read any of his books? The obvious that smacks the 'enlightened' reader pugilistically between the eyes is that any one-party rule is an open invitation for the induction of a narcissitic Nero who may, on a whim, blithely pin ne'er-do-wells to trees, coat with wax, and set afire to serve as improvised night lights. If the autocrat can be enlightened the autocrat can be debauch. But, this is just one of many scenarios that has given rise to civil angst. To posit an argument that hinges on the 'puerile' fears of a few citizens is to criminally deprecate the wide-spread, warranted hand-wringing over profligate spending by our "enlightened" legates and imperators. And if one decides that the felonious argument should trump all other arguments, one can pull out the Michael Moore rabbit of an argument out of the hat and flippantly offer, "You really think that's ever going to happen?" Can history ever serve as the example? This sounds like a rant. I'll just let it stand without further comment. Thank-you. I have no doubt that posterity will find the 'commentary' measured and apropos, as much as it is obvious that I have not decried Friedman's right to state his views. -- Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service -------http://www.NewsDemon.com------ Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access |
Does Jimmy Carter read rec.boats?
"JohnH" wrote in message
... On Tue, 15 Sep 2009 21:46:42 -0700, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "H the K" wrote in message news:2LmdnfhTW506pi3XnZ2dnUVZ_qmdnZ2d@earthlink. com... From NBC's Mark Murray In an interview with NBC's Brian Williams, former Democratic President Jimmy Carter attributed much of the conservative opposition that President Obama is receiving to the issue of race. "I think an overwhelming portion of the intensely demonstrated animosity toward President Barack Obama is based on the fact that he is a black man," Carter said. "I live in the South, and I've seen the South come a long way, and I've seen the rest of the country that share the South's attitude toward minority groups at that time, particularly African Americans." Carter continued, "And that racism inclination still exists. And I think it's bubbled up to the surface because of the belief among many white people, not just in the South but around the country, that African-Americans are not qualified to lead this great country. It's an abominable circumstance, and it grieves me and concerns me very deeply." -- President Carter...he must be reading herring, jack, justhate, DK, BAR and the rest of the right-wing bigots who populate this joint. I definitely think a lot of it is racism. Just look at the signs displayed in the rally in DC... I certainly acknowledge that Bush got treated to signs comparing him to Hitler, but I don't believe any of them made reference to his race. I also think that a lot of it is more of a fear-based reaction than out and out racism... white good/black bad. Obama is an unknown to lots and lots of people.. unknown in the sense that some have never had a black man or women be in charge of directly affecting their lives, and they're afraid. The really disturbing part is the promoting of these feelings of fear and uncertainty by "news services" such as Fox and Dick Army's Freedomworks. Both of these groups know better. They should be ashamed of themselves. More drivel. -- John H More truth. Sorry if it hurts. -- Nom=de=Plume |
Does Jimmy Carter read rec.boats?
On Sep 16, 2:30*pm, wrote:
On Wed, 16 Sep 2009 10:22:30 -0700 (PDT), wf3h wrote: On Sep 16, 12:42*pm, wrote: On Wed, 16 Sep 2009 04:47:42 -0700 (PDT), wf3h wrote: On Sep 16, 1:46*am, wrote: On Tue, 15 Sep 2009 21:46:42 -0700, "nom=de=plume" snipped for brevity the biggest spenders in US history were ronald reagan and george w. bush. where was the outrage when they busted the budget? Got up on the wrong side of a reasoned discourse this morning? "House Speaker Thomas O'Neill (D., Mass.), who had tried to offset the President's personal pulling power with some tough political talk of his own, said after the vote that "the monkey is off the Democrat's back. *The federal budget cuts, as brutal as they are, are Reagan's cuts." Toledo Blade, May 8th, 1981 unfortunately for your distorted view of history, the right wing 'cato institute' agrees with me: http://www.cato.org/pub_display.php?pub_id=3750 President Bush has presided over the largest overall increase in inflation-adjusted federal spending since Lyndon B. Johnson. Even after excluding spending on defense and homeland security, Bush is still the biggest-spending president in 30 years and for a longer view, the biggest budget busters have been republicans: http://findarticles.com/p/articles/m...6/ai_20409139/ Over the last 100 years, of the five presidents who reigned over the largest domestic spending growth, four were Republicans. Taken in order of expenditures, they were Richard Nixon, Herbert Hoover, Dwight Eisenhower, Harry S. Truman (the lone Democrat), and George Bush. and for a view of presidents and budget deficits, check http://jimbuie.blogs.com/photos/unca...5/natl_debt_ch... to see what a BIG spender reagan was compared to clinton. now, right winger, go read. you might learn something May the gentle reader please note, if one is disposed to an honest scrutiny of the discourse, that this particular thread has devolved from a discussion of what impels and compels those who object to the ostensible, inexorable, oppression through legislation by government IOW 'his' form of govt...where the rich rule and a recognition of the use of the strawman argument of racism applied to those very objectors. compared to a form of govt where the middle class has a voice...an idea that's anathema to the rich-wannabee's *My commentary was not read carefully by this particular antagonist as this antagonist launched into his standard rigamarole of "busted budgets" and whatever that is supposed to suggest. *The lack of an apprehensible commentary on his or her part is best illustrated in the use of the ad hominem "right winger," which is applied through vacuous presupposition and palpable angst. and the poseur, faux sesquipedalianism belies the feigned intellectualism of the bankrupt supplicants for right wing ideology |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:16 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com