What was that?
 

On Sep 14, 12:18*pm, wrote:


The problem is we are breeding more terrorists with our killing of
their civilians than we are killing.
The Afghanis are equating us with the Soviets now, negating all we did
in the 80s to help them beat the Soviets

anyone believe this?

bueller? bueller?

What was that?
 

On Sun, 13 Sep 2009 20:18:24 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote:


"H the K" wrote in message
om...
Calif Bill wrote:
"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...
"JustWait" wrote in message
...
In article ,
says...
On Sun, 13 Sep 2009 09:59:56 -0400, NotNow wrote:

JustWait wrote:
In article ,
says...
9/11 came and went without much fanfare. I wonder why that is.
Far less
people were killed at Pearl Harbor, but the outrage was much more.
I
thought it was sad that so many have forgotten so soon, so many
think it was
a conspiracy from within, and that we don't have to worry about
future
terrorism. We are all so safe now that terrorism has been removed
from the
vocabulary.

Steve
Forgetting is politically expedient for nearly half of the
country...

Obama is keeping us safe from the evil terrorists, just like the
right
claimed Bush was doing because there wasn't an attack after 9/11
You are correct. That's another thing I can add to the list of great
Obama accomplishments.
Yup, it's great that Bush spent 8 years softening them up:) snerk

--
Wafa free since 2009

Yeah, murdering people. Lots of people. One of Bush's accomplishments in
your mind anyway.


--
Nom=de=Plume


Just continuing in the footsteps of his predecessor.

Bush killed at least 100,000 people. He also allowed 3000+ U.S. civilians
to be killed.





--
Birther-Deather-Tenther-Teabagger:
Idiots All

And Clinton was killing people in Irag, Bosnia, and allowed Ben Ladin to
walk, so he could plan and train the pilots on his watch. They both suck.
They suck as much as you suck and that is a whole bunch of suck.


ROTFL!
--

John H

What was that?
 

On Mon, 14 Sep 2009 13:15:49 -0400, NotNow wrote:

JohnH wrote:
On Sun, 13 Sep 2009 20:18:24 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote:

"H the K" wrote in message
m...
Calif Bill wrote:
"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...
"JustWait" wrote in message
...
In article ,
says...
On Sun, 13 Sep 2009 09:59:56 -0400, NotNow wrote:

JustWait wrote:
In article ,
says...
9/11 came and went without much fanfare. I wonder why that is.
Far less
people were killed at Pearl Harbor, but the outrage was much more.
I
thought it was sad that so many have forgotten so soon, so many
think it was
a conspiracy from within, and that we don't have to worry about
future
terrorism. We are all so safe now that terrorism has been removed
from the
vocabulary.

Steve
Forgetting is politically expedient for nearly half of the
country...

Obama is keeping us safe from the evil terrorists, just like the
right
claimed Bush was doing because there wasn't an attack after 9/11
You are correct. That's another thing I can add to the list of great
Obama accomplishments.
Yup, it's great that Bush spent 8 years softening them up:) snerk

--
Wafa free since 2009
Yeah, murdering people. Lots of people. One of Bush's accomplishments in
your mind anyway.


--
Nom=de=Plume

Just continuing in the footsteps of his predecessor.
Bush killed at least 100,000 people. He also allowed 3000+ U.S. civilians
to be killed.





--
Birther-Deather-Tenther-Teabagger:
Idiots All
And Clinton was killing people in Irag, Bosnia, and allowed Ben Ladin to
walk, so he could plan and train the pilots on his watch. They both suck.
They suck as much as you suck and that is a whole bunch of suck.


ROTFL!
--

John H

Of course non of that matters now that Clinton isn't in office, correct
John?

Absolutey!

But this was quite funny:

"They both suck. They suck as much as you suck and that is a whole
bunch of suck. "

Maybe you missed it in your desire to correct me for some flagrantly
offensive act.
--

John H

What was that?
 

JohnH wrote:
On Sun, 13 Sep 2009 20:43:48 -0400, JustWait
wrote:

In article ,
says...
On Sun, 13 Sep 2009 16:35:06 -0400, NotNow wrote:

JohnH wrote:
On Sun, 13 Sep 2009 11:35:26 -0400, NotNow wrote:

JustWait wrote:
In article ,
says...
JustWait wrote:
In article ,
says...
9/11 came and went without much fanfare. I wonder why that is. Far less
people were killed at Pearl Harbor, but the outrage was much more. I
thought it was sad that so many have forgotten so soon, so many think it was
a conspiracy from within, and that we don't have to worry about future
terrorism. We are all so safe now that terrorism has been removed from the
vocabulary.

Steve
Forgetting is politically expedient for nearly half of the country...

Obama is keeping us safe from the evil terrorists, just like the right
claimed Bush was doing because there wasn't an attack after 9/11
I think the Bush Admin. already took care of the heavy lifting... Using
your analogy, my Doctor has kept me safe from bubonic plague..

Your party was the one claiming that Bush was keeping us safe. And the
reasoning was because there hadn't been an attack since 9/11. SO, it's a
simple analogy that Obama is keeping us safe also. But, I honestly
suspected that you'd figure out a way to spin it so that Bush is the
hero, and Obama hasn't done anything. Typical and expected.
Loogy, I think you're correct on this one. 'Bama has done a super job
at preventing terrorist attacks. Of course, there's no such thing as a
terrorist attack, but he's been successful in preventing 'man made
disasters' also.

And, I've not caught bubonic plague either!
--

John H
You're missing the point! When Bush was president, you and other
righties made frequent comments about how safe he was keeping us because
we hadn't had an attack since 9/11. So it stands that Obama is doing a
great job at it too. I made several comments about how lame that
reasoning was.
Oh my goodness. You may be right again, although I can't remember
*ever* uttering a comment about how safe Bush was keeping us. Perhaps
you could find even *one* example of such?

And, I've done nothing *but* agree that 'Bama is doing a super job at
keeping us safe from man made disasters.

What the hell more do you want?
Yeah, me either but don't let that stop anybody from stereotyping us,
especially a representative of "the tolerant party"...;)

I can't figure Loogy out. Hell, I praise the hell out of 'Bama, but
it's never good enough.

Just today, 'Bama saved over 240,000 jobs. The guy is probably the
best leader since Moses.
--

John H

John, your condescending bull**** is getting old.

What was that?
 

"BAR" wrote in message
...
nom=de=plume wrote:
"BAR" wrote in message
...
nom=de=plume wrote:
"BAR" wrote in message
...
nom=de=plume wrote:
"JustWait" wrote in message
...
In article ,

says...
JustWait wrote:
In article ,

says...
9/11 came and went without much fanfare. I wonder why that is.
Far less
people were killed at Pearl Harbor, but the outrage was much
more. I
thought it was sad that so many have forgotten so soon, so many
think it was
a conspiracy from within, and that we don't have to worry about
future
terrorism. We are all so safe now that terrorism has been
removed from the
vocabulary.

Steve
Forgetting is politically expedient for nearly half of the
country...

Obama is keeping us safe from the evil terrorists, just like the
right
claimed Bush was doing because there wasn't an attack after 9/11
I think the Bush Admin. already took care of the heavy lifting...
Using
your analogy, my Doctor has kept me safe from bubonic plague..

--
Wafa free since 2009
Yeah, like starting a war to inflame the Islamic world. A war of
choice, a war where 1000s of our men and women died for no reason.

Your doctor didn't keep you safe. It was institutions such as the
CDC.. gov't run agencies.
The CDC is an information clearing house and policy producing
organization. The CDC is not on the leading edge of research.

In that case, don't follow their recommendations. Duhh...

Wasn't the CDC involved in the plastic wrap and duct tape
reccomendation?



Nope... that was DHS.


Are you sure? I didn't think the DHS had been created or congealed at that
time.



I was referring to this incident... were you thinking of something else?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duct_tape_alert


--
Nom=de=Plume

What was that?
 

"wf3h" wrote in message
...
On Sep 14, 12:51 am, "nom=de=plume" wrote:
"Calif Bill" wrote in message

...







"H the K" wrote in message
om...
Calif Bill wrote:
"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...
"JustWait" wrote in message
...
In article ,
says...
On Sun, 13 Sep 2009 09:59:56 -0400, NotNow
wrote:

JustWait wrote:
In article ,

says...
9/11 came and went without much fanfare. I wonder why that is.
Far less
people were killed at Pearl Harbor, but the outrage was much
more.
I
thought it was sad that so many have forgotten so soon, so many
think it was
a conspiracy from within, and that we don't have to worry about
future
terrorism. We are all so safe now that terrorism has been
removed
from the
vocabulary.

Steve
Forgetting is politically expedient for nearly half of the
country...

Obama is keeping us safe from the evil terrorists, just like the
right
claimed Bush was doing because there wasn't an attack after 9/11
You are correct. That's another thing I can add to the list of
great
Obama accomplishments.
Yup, it's great that Bush spent 8 years softening them up:) snerk

--
Wafa free since 2009

Yeah, murdering people. Lots of people. One of Bush's accomplishments
in your mind anyway.

--
Nom=de=Plume

Just continuing in the footsteps of his predecessor.

Bush killed at least 100,000 people. He also allowed 3000+ U.S.
civilians
to be killed.

--
Birther-Deather-Tenther-Teabagger:
Idiots All

And Clinton was killing people in Irag, Bosnia, and allowed Ben Ladin to
walk, so he could plan and train the pilots on his watch. They both
suck.
They suck as much as you suck and that is a whole bunch of suck.

Allowed bin Laden to walk? How's that? He tried to get him several times.


not only that, but every time clinton did something, the GOP
complained it was 'political'. if he'd killed bin laden the GOP
would have impeached him


They found something else.... lol


--
Nom=de=Plume

What was that?
 

On Mon, 14 Sep 2009 14:41:32 -0400, NotNow wrote:

JohnH wrote:
On Sun, 13 Sep 2009 20:43:48 -0400, JustWait
wrote:

In article ,
says...
On Sun, 13 Sep 2009 16:35:06 -0400, NotNow wrote:

JohnH wrote:
On Sun, 13 Sep 2009 11:35:26 -0400, NotNow wrote:

JustWait wrote:
In article ,
says...
JustWait wrote:
In article ,
says...
9/11 came and went without much fanfare. I wonder why that is. Far less
people were killed at Pearl Harbor, but the outrage was much more. I
thought it was sad that so many have forgotten so soon, so many think it was
a conspiracy from within, and that we don't have to worry about future
terrorism. We are all so safe now that terrorism has been removed from the
vocabulary.

Steve
Forgetting is politically expedient for nearly half of the country...

Obama is keeping us safe from the evil terrorists, just like the right
claimed Bush was doing because there wasn't an attack after 9/11
I think the Bush Admin. already took care of the heavy lifting... Using
your analogy, my Doctor has kept me safe from bubonic plague..

Your party was the one claiming that Bush was keeping us safe. And the
reasoning was because there hadn't been an attack since 9/11. SO, it's a
simple analogy that Obama is keeping us safe also. But, I honestly
suspected that you'd figure out a way to spin it so that Bush is the
hero, and Obama hasn't done anything. Typical and expected.
Loogy, I think you're correct on this one. 'Bama has done a super job
at preventing terrorist attacks. Of course, there's no such thing as a
terrorist attack, but he's been successful in preventing 'man made
disasters' also.

And, I've not caught bubonic plague either!
--

John H
You're missing the point! When Bush was president, you and other
righties made frequent comments about how safe he was keeping us because
we hadn't had an attack since 9/11. So it stands that Obama is doing a
great job at it too. I made several comments about how lame that
reasoning was.
Oh my goodness. You may be right again, although I can't remember
*ever* uttering a comment about how safe Bush was keeping us. Perhaps
you could find even *one* example of such?

And, I've done nothing *but* agree that 'Bama is doing a super job at
keeping us safe from man made disasters.

What the hell more do you want?
Yeah, me either but don't let that stop anybody from stereotyping us,
especially a representative of "the tolerant party"...;)

I can't figure Loogy out. Hell, I praise the hell out of 'Bama, but
it's never good enough.

Just today, 'Bama saved over 240,000 jobs. The guy is probably the
best leader since Moses.
--

John H

John, your condescending bull**** is getting old.

Loogy, you'd whine if someone ****ed in your beer.

Are you implying he *didn't* save 240,000 jobs today?
--

John H

What was that?
 

wrote in message
...
On Sun, 13 Sep 2009 23:26:33 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

The interesting thing to me was said on Anderson Cooper the other
night from Afghanistan. It turns out we don't even think Bin Laden is
there anymore and that the Taliban has absolutely no global
aspirations. Their connection to Al Queda is tenuous at best.


I thought it was pretty clear that bin laden is in Pakistan. He left Tora
Bora, right...

Yet we are still losing Americans every day looking for him in
Afghanistan ... amazing.
There does seem to be a double standard on the left. If this was GWB
doing this, it would be the only thing the talking heads on TV were
talking about.


Not to my knowledge we are.... we're supposedly trying to protect the Afg.
people and ensuring a stable gov't there. I haven't heard anything about
hunting for bin laden in Afg. since he left Tora Bora.

Not sure what you mean by the double standard comment. The Afg. war was
supported by the world community, by both right and left in this country,
and now is being criticized by many on the left as a waste of effort.

--
Nom=de=Plume

What was that?
 

wrote in message
...
On Mon, 14 Sep 2009 05:37:41 -0700 (PDT), wf3h
wrote:

Let's hope Obama doesn't break that record but the worst days of the
"good war" are on Obama's watch. I still am not sure why we are
there.
http://icasualties.org/oef/

I don't have a good feeling about increasing troop strength at this
point.
As Obama said (paraphrasing), the generals are thinking about the war,
the
president needs to think about the world.

The interesting thing to me was said on Anderson Cooper the other
night from Afghanistan. It turns out we don't even think Bin Laden is
there anymore and that the Taliban has absolutely no global
aspirations. Their connection to Al Queda is tenuous at best.-

today that's true. wasn't true on 9/11.

If you believe that you are saying GWB was right and BHO is wrong. Are
you sure you don't want to reconsider?
Personally I don't believe the Taliban has ever had any grudge with
the US beyond our invading their country and if we leave they won't
care about us at all. They tolerated al queda but, I doubt they had
anything to do with 9-11


?? The Taliban were clearly supporting bin laden, although not many years
prior to 9/11, certainly leading up to it. They did more than tolerate them.
They actively supported them in the timeframe I notes.

--
Nom=de=Plume

What was that?
 

JohnH wrote:
On Mon, 14 Sep 2009 14:41:32 -0400, NotNow wrote:

JohnH wrote:
On Sun, 13 Sep 2009 20:43:48 -0400, JustWait
wrote:

In article ,
says...
On Sun, 13 Sep 2009 16:35:06 -0400, NotNow wrote:

JohnH wrote:
On Sun, 13 Sep 2009 11:35:26 -0400, NotNow wrote:

JustWait wrote:
In article ,
says...
JustWait wrote:
In article ,
says...
9/11 came and went without much fanfare. I wonder why that is. Far less
people were killed at Pearl Harbor, but the outrage was much more. I
thought it was sad that so many have forgotten so soon, so many think it was
a conspiracy from within, and that we don't have to worry about future
terrorism. We are all so safe now that terrorism has been removed from the
vocabulary.

Steve
Forgetting is politically expedient for nearly half of the country...

Obama is keeping us safe from the evil terrorists, just like the right
claimed Bush was doing because there wasn't an attack after 9/11
I think the Bush Admin. already took care of the heavy lifting... Using
your analogy, my Doctor has kept me safe from bubonic plague..

Your party was the one claiming that Bush was keeping us safe. And the
reasoning was because there hadn't been an attack since 9/11. SO, it's a
simple analogy that Obama is keeping us safe also. But, I honestly
suspected that you'd figure out a way to spin it so that Bush is the
hero, and Obama hasn't done anything. Typical and expected.
Loogy, I think you're correct on this one. 'Bama has done a super job
at preventing terrorist attacks. Of course, there's no such thing as a
terrorist attack, but he's been successful in preventing 'man made
disasters' also.

And, I've not caught bubonic plague either!
--

John H
You're missing the point! When Bush was president, you and other
righties made frequent comments about how safe he was keeping us because
we hadn't had an attack since 9/11. So it stands that Obama is doing a
great job at it too. I made several comments about how lame that
reasoning was.
Oh my goodness. You may be right again, although I can't remember
*ever* uttering a comment about how safe Bush was keeping us. Perhaps
you could find even *one* example of such?

And, I've done nothing *but* agree that 'Bama is doing a super job at
keeping us safe from man made disasters.

What the hell more do you want?
Yeah, me either but don't let that stop anybody from stereotyping us,
especially a representative of "the tolerant party"...;)
I can't figure Loogy out. Hell, I praise the hell out of 'Bama, but
it's never good enough.

Just today, 'Bama saved over 240,000 jobs. The guy is probably the
best leader since Moses.
--

John H
John, your condescending bull**** is getting old.

Loogy, you'd whine if someone ****ed in your beer.

Are you implying he *didn't* save 240,000 jobs today?
--

John H
No, I'm "implying" your condescending bull**** is getting old. AND lame.