Amazing...
 

http://tinyurl.com/m4xz56

Amazing...
 

On Sep 10, 5:35*am, Tom Francis - SWSports
wrote:
http://tinyurl.com/m4xz56

i couldn't get the link to load, Cap'n.

Amazing...
 

On Thu, 10 Sep 2009 04:47:59 -0700 (PDT), Tim
wrote:

On Sep 10, 5:35*am, Tom Francis - SWSports
wrote:
http://tinyurl.com/m4xz56

i couldn't get the link to load, Cap'n.

Maybe if you weren't using a 386 with a Hercules video adaptor and a
1200 baud modem, it would load. :)

Try this.

http://www.nasa.gov/images/content/3..._full_full.jpg

Amazing...
 

Tom Francis - SWSports wrote:
http://tinyurl.com/m4xz56

Has anyone offered an idea as to the cause of this structure yet?

Amazing...
 

Tom Francis - SWSports wrote:
On Thu, 10 Sep 2009 04:47:59 -0700 (PDT), Tim
wrote:

On Sep 10, 5:35 am, Tom Francis - SWSports
wrote:
http://tinyurl.com/m4xz56
i couldn't get the link to load, Cap'n.

Maybe if you weren't using a 386 with a Hercules video adaptor and a
1200 baud modem, it would load. :)

Try this.

http://www.nasa.gov/images/content/3..._full_full.jpg
A 386?? Tim's upgraded??!!!

Amazing...
 

On Sep 10, 7:06*am, Tom Francis - SWSports
wrote:
On Thu, 10 Sep 2009 04:47:59 -0700 (PDT), Tim
wrote:

On Sep 10, 5:35*am, Tom Francis - SWSports
wrote:
http://tinyurl.com/m4xz56

i couldn't get the link to load, Cap'n.

Maybe if you weren't using a 386 with a Hercules video adaptor and a
1200 baud modem, it would load. *:)

Try this.

http://www.nasa.gov/images/content/3..._full_full.jpg

Thats better. The Wang took that one!

Amazing...
 

On Sep 10, 7:57*am, NotNow wrote:
Tom Francis - SWSports wrote: On Thu, 10 Sep 2009 04:47:59 -0700 (PDT), Tim
wrote:

On Sep 10, 5:35 am, Tom Francis - SWSports
wrote:
http://tinyurl.com/m4xz56
i couldn't get the link to load, Cap'n.

Maybe if you weren't using a 386 with a Hercules video adaptor and a
1200 baud modem, it would load. *:)

Try this.

http://www.nasa.gov/images/content/3..._full_full.jpg

A 386?? Tim's upgraded??!!!

Hey! Everything around my place is soooooo Honeywell!

Amazing...
 

On Thu, 10 Sep 2009 08:13:50 -0400, BAR wrote:

Tom Francis - SWSports wrote:
http://tinyurl.com/m4xz56

Has anyone offered an idea as to the cause of this structure yet?

Yep - it's an exploded star.

"NGC 6302 lies within our Milky Way galaxy, roughly 3,800 light-years
away in the constellation Scorpius. The glowing gas is the star’s
outer layers, expelled over about 2,200 years. The "butterfly"
stretches for more than two light-years, which is about half the
distance from the Sun to the nearest star, Alpha Centauri."

http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/hu...ero/index.html