![]() |
Don't follow our example
I am trying to figure out what Obama could possibly say to
schoolchildren when he seems to have no qualifications on education. In fact, before becoming a senator, the only thing he ever did was to run the Chicago Annenberg Challenge, a $15 million program to raise test scores of schoolkids in Chicago that was a total failure with test scores dropping further. His head of the Dept of Education ran the Chicago School System, one of the worst in the country with one of the highest drop out rates anywhere, a total failure. What could these people be qualified to say to schoolkids, "Dont **** up like we did"? Their Dept Of Education Directive to local school systems to show the Messiah's speech followed by their North Korean style worshipful of Obama lesson plan is a clear usurption of local school systems control and is so clearly so Soviet-like that anybody with more than two neurons would balk at it. The "Let's Worship Obama" lesson plan would not produce admiration from kids in High School, it would produce contempt. Their failure to recognize this places them so far out from reality as to clearly illustrate their incompetance. I can guarantee that after doing this worshipful worksheet, high school kids are going to go out and burn as much gas as they can just to rebel against stupidity. High School kids are going to listen to him and do this BS work and then think "Somewhere in Kenya a village is missing it's idiot". I have no problem with this as it will cause these kids to vote against liberal stupidity when they turn 18 but it does show that the USA is in real trouble right now. |
Don't follow our example
On Sat, 5 Sep 2009 11:31:17 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch
wrote: I am trying to figure out what Obama could possibly say to schoolchildren when he seems to have no qualifications on education. Do you think you would feel qualified as an educator if you'd been employed for several years as a professor of constitutional law? Are you still popping your wife's pain meds? |
Don't follow our example
"Frogwatch" wrote in message
... I am trying to figure out what Obama could possibly say to schoolchildren when he seems to have no qualifications on education. Yeah! He only taught Constitutional law. Nothing to do with education there. snip The "Let's Worship Obama" lesson plan would not produce admiration from kids in High School, it would produce contempt. Their failure to recognize this places them so far out from reality as to clearly illustrate their incompetance. I can guarantee that after doing this worshipful worksheet, high school kids are going to go out and burn as much gas as they can just to rebel against stupidity. High School kids are going to listen to him and do this BS work and then think "Somewhere in Kenya a village is missing it's idiot". I have no problem with this as it will cause these kids to vote against liberal stupidity when they turn 18 but it does show that the USA is in real trouble right now. Are you a birther or a bircher? It's hard to figure it out from your diatribe. I guess it was ok for Reagan and both Bushs to talk to kids, as they were Republicans. -- Nom=de=Plume |
Don't follow our example
jps wrote:
On Sat, 5 Sep 2009 11:31:17 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch wrote: I am trying to figure out what Obama could possibly say to schoolchildren when he seems to have no qualifications on education. Do you think you would feel qualified as an educator if you'd been employed for several years as a professor of constitutional law? Are you still popping your wife's pain meds? Was obama a professor of Constitutional law? From his actions he and biden appear to have no knowledge that the US Constitution exist. At the time of the debates biden did not know that the Vice President presided over the US Senate and thought that President Bush and Vice President Cheney were trying to take over the Senate because of Vice President Cheney involvement in the US Senate. State Rights issues appears to be an unknown obama. He still thinks that President Bush did not move into New Orleans without a written request from the local government because President Bush was refusing to provide federal assistance to the flooded city. |
Don't follow our example
On Sep 5, 3:38*pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:
"Frogwatch" wrote in message ... I am trying to figure out what Obama could possibly say to schoolchildren when he seems to have no qualifications on education. Yeah! He only taught Constitutional law. Nothing to do with education there. snip The "Let's Worship Obama" lesson plan would not produce admiration from kids in High School, it would produce contempt. *Their failure to recognize this places them so far out from reality as to clearly illustrate their incompetance. *I can guarantee that after doing this worshipful worksheet, high school kids are going to go out and burn as much gas as they can just to rebel against stupidity. High School kids are going to listen to him and do this BS work and then think "Somewhere in Kenya a village is missing it's idiot". *I have no problem with this as it will cause these kids to vote against liberal stupidity when they turn 18 but it does show that the USA is in real trouble right now. Are you a birther or a bircher? It's hard to figure it out from your diatribe. I guess it was ok for Reagan and both Bushs to talk to kids, as they were Republicans. -- Nom=de=Plume Reagan and Bush's depts of ed did not issue soviet-like directives about their speeches. They also did not issue north korean-like presidential worship lesson plans. Most of us have no problems with the pres speaking to the kids but the way it has been done is like something from North Korea and shows how completely incompetant this administration is. When you combine this with all of Obama's appointees who have somehow forgotten to pay their taxes while wanting US to pay more and the controversy over van Jones and the disastrous porkulus program and the Cash for Clunkers that accomplished nothing and the war going badly in Afghanistan and over 10% unemployment and a deficit far higher than anything Bush could have conceived in his wildest imaginings you get an impression of stupidity. Quite frankly, the Obama admin seems to be composed of total morons. There is no possible way that anybody with any intelligence would allow these people to get anywhere near their health care. It would not matter if 99% of voters voted for Obama and still supported him, the other 1% should use any means necessary to prevent their lives being put in danger by having morons running health care. You do not allow the inmates of an asylum to run around with loaded guns no matter how they vote. |
Don't follow our example
On Sep 5, 4:10*pm, Frogwatch wrote:
On Sep 5, 3:38*pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "Frogwatch" wrote in message .... I am trying to figure out what Obama could possibly say to schoolchildren when he seems to have no qualifications on education. Yeah! He only taught Constitutional law. Nothing to do with education there. snip The "Let's Worship Obama" lesson plan would not produce admiration from kids in High School, it would produce contempt. *Their failure to recognize this places them so far out from reality as to clearly illustrate their incompetance. *I can guarantee that after doing this worshipful worksheet, high school kids are going to go out and burn as much gas as they can just to rebel against stupidity. High School kids are going to listen to him and do this BS work and then think "Somewhere in Kenya a village is missing it's idiot". *I have no problem with this as it will cause these kids to vote against liberal stupidity when they turn 18 but it does show that the USA is in real trouble right now. Are you a birther or a bircher? It's hard to figure it out from your diatribe. I guess it was ok for Reagan and both Bushs to talk to kids, as they were Republicans. -- Nom=de=Plume Reagan and Bush's depts of ed did not issue soviet-like directives about their speeches. *They also did not issue north korean-like presidential worship lesson plans. *Most of us have no problems with the pres speaking to the kids but the way it has been done is like something from North Korea and shows how completely incompetant this administration is. When you combine this with all of Obama's appointees who have somehow forgotten to pay their taxes while wanting US to pay more and the controversy over van Jones and the disastrous porkulus program and the Cash for Clunkers that accomplished nothing and the war going badly in Afghanistan and over 10% unemployment and a deficit far higher than anything Bush could have conceived in his wildest imaginings you get an impression of stupidity. Quite frankly, the Obama admin seems to be composed of total morons. There is no possible way that anybody with any intelligence would allow these people to get anywhere near their health care. *It would not matter if 99% of voters voted for Obama and still supported him, the other 1% should use any means necessary to prevent their lives being put in danger by having morons running health care. *You do not allow the inmates of an asylum to run around with loaded guns no matter how they vote. I taught college physics, certainly more useful than teaching law but that does not make me an expert on education AND there is that record of failure of his. |
Don't follow our example
On Sep 5, 4:12*pm, Frogwatch wrote:
On Sep 5, 4:10*pm, Frogwatch wrote: On Sep 5, 3:38*pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "Frogwatch" wrote in message .... I am trying to figure out what Obama could possibly say to schoolchildren when he seems to have no qualifications on education.. Yeah! He only taught Constitutional law. Nothing to do with education there. snip The "Let's Worship Obama" lesson plan would not produce admiration from kids in High School, it would produce contempt. *Their failure to recognize this places them so far out from reality as to clearly illustrate their incompetance. *I can guarantee that after doing this worshipful worksheet, high school kids are going to go out and burn as much gas as they can just to rebel against stupidity. High School kids are going to listen to him and do this BS work and then think "Somewhere in Kenya a village is missing it's idiot". *I have no problem with this as it will cause these kids to vote against liberal stupidity when they turn 18 but it does show that the USA is in real trouble right now. Are you a birther or a bircher? It's hard to figure it out from your diatribe. I guess it was ok for Reagan and both Bushs to talk to kids, as they were Republicans. -- Nom=de=Plume Reagan and Bush's depts of ed did not issue soviet-like directives about their speeches. *They also did not issue north korean-like presidential worship lesson plans. *Most of us have no problems with the pres speaking to the kids but the way it has been done is like something from North Korea and shows how completely incompetant this administration is. When you combine this with all of Obama's appointees who have somehow forgotten to pay their taxes while wanting US to pay more and the controversy over van Jones and the disastrous porkulus program and the Cash for Clunkers that accomplished nothing and the war going badly in Afghanistan and over 10% unemployment and a deficit far higher than anything Bush could have conceived in his wildest imaginings you get an impression of stupidity. Quite frankly, the Obama admin seems to be composed of total morons. There is no possible way that anybody with any intelligence would allow these people to get anywhere near their health care. *It would not matter if 99% of voters voted for Obama and still supported him, the other 1% should use any means necessary to prevent their lives being put in danger by having morons running health care. *You do not allow the inmates of an asylum to run around with loaded guns no matter how they vote. I taught college physics, certainly more useful than teaching law but that does not make me an expert on education AND there is that record of failure of his. As I have pointed out, the only thing Obama has consistently done is to fail. Do you truly want such an abject failure trying to motivate your kids? |
Don't follow our example
On Sat, 05 Sep 2009 12:01:55 -0700, jps wrote:
On Sat, 5 Sep 2009 11:31:17 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch wrote: I am trying to figure out what Obama could possibly say to schoolchildren when he seems to have no qualifications on education. Do you think you would feel qualified as an educator if you'd been employed for several years as a professor of constitutional law? Are you still popping your wife's pain meds? A professor of constitutional law is in no way qualified to teach K-12 in the Virginia public schools, and I doubt if he would be qualified in any other state. Of course, Chicago would probably hire him. I would have no problems with him providing any university with a lesson plan and a televised speech. -- John H All decisions, even those made by liberals, are the result of binary thinking. |
Don't follow our example
On Sat, 05 Sep 2009 16:06:45 -0400, Keith Nuttle
wrote: jps wrote: On Sat, 5 Sep 2009 11:31:17 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch wrote: I am trying to figure out what Obama could possibly say to schoolchildren when he seems to have no qualifications on education. Do you think you would feel qualified as an educator if you'd been employed for several years as a professor of constitutional law? Are you still popping your wife's pain meds? Was obama a professor of Constitutional law? From his actions he and biden appear to have no knowledge that the US Constitution exist. We're not talking about Biden. The specific complaint was the he has no basis for addressing school children since he has qualifications as a teacher. Do you something to refute my assertion that he has every qualification to think of himself as a teacher as a result of having been paid as a professor or constitutional law at a university? Besides that, he's the leader of our country. The problem here is that some folks can't get over that there's a black man in the White House and some folks are just sour grapes losers who can't get over the fact that their party is woefully out of power. Bigots and sore losers. What a team. |
Don't follow our example
On Sat, 5 Sep 2009 13:10:27 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch
wrote: On Sep 5, 3:38*pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "Frogwatch" wrote in message ... I am trying to figure out what Obama could possibly say to schoolchildren when he seems to have no qualifications on education. Yeah! He only taught Constitutional law. Nothing to do with education there. snip The "Let's Worship Obama" lesson plan would not produce admiration from kids in High School, it would produce contempt. *Their failure to recognize this places them so far out from reality as to clearly illustrate their incompetance. *I can guarantee that after doing this worshipful worksheet, high school kids are going to go out and burn as much gas as they can just to rebel against stupidity. High School kids are going to listen to him and do this BS work and then think "Somewhere in Kenya a village is missing it's idiot". *I have no problem with this as it will cause these kids to vote against liberal stupidity when they turn 18 but it does show that the USA is in real trouble right now. Are you a birther or a bircher? It's hard to figure it out from your diatribe. I guess it was ok for Reagan and both Bushs to talk to kids, as they were Republicans. -- Nom=de=Plume Reagan and Bush's depts of ed did not issue soviet-like directives about their speeches. According to you, internationally recognized authority on propaganda. Truth is, each of the Republican presidents used the pulpit to forward their agendas with school children. Some of us were adult enough to hold our noses and let the kids hear what they had to say. The infantile response of the "conservative" base is mind blowing. Grow up and get over the fact that your party is in shambles and has lost control of the country. And thank God it's in smarter hands. |
Don't follow our example
On Sat, 05 Sep 2009 12:01:55 -0700, jps wrote:
On Sat, 5 Sep 2009 11:31:17 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch wrote: I am trying to figure out what Obama could possibly say to schoolchildren when he seems to have no qualifications on education. Do you think you would feel qualified as an educator if you'd been employed for several years as a professor of constitutional law? Are you still popping your wife's pain meds? A good description: "In a move suggestive of the Pyongyang public school system, the U.S. Department of Education recommended that before the speech students collectively brainstorm questions like, 'Why does President Obama want to speak with us today? How will he inspire us?' Classrooms are to be festooned with 'notable quotes excerpted (and posted in large print on board) from President Obama's speeches about education,' presumably alongside benevolent-looking images of the dear leader." Tripe. -- John H All decisions, even those made by liberals, are the result of binary thinking. |
Don't follow our example
"Frogwatch" wrote in message
... Are you a birther or a bircher? It's hard to figure it out from your diatribe. I guess it was ok for Reagan and both Bushs to talk to kids, as they were Republicans. -- Nom=de=Plume Reagan and Bush's depts of ed did not issue soviet-like directives about their speeches. They also did not issue north korean-like presidential worship lesson plans. This is just looney... you can *say* this, but that doesn't make it true. Most of us have no problems with the pres speaking to the kids but the way it has been done is like something from North Korea and shows how completely incompetant this administration is. Apparently it was ok when Reagan talked about his tax-cut proposals to kids and when Bush the First asked kids to write him with how they could help him. But, it's not ok when Obama does this. Quite frankly, the Obama admin seems to be composed of total morons. Compared to what? Bush II? There is no possible way that anybody with any intelligence would allow these people to get anywhere near their health care. It would not matter if 99% of voters voted for Obama and still supported him, the other 1% should use any means necessary to prevent their lives being put in danger by having morons running health care. You do not allow the inmates of an asylum to run around with loaded guns no matter how they vote. Over 70% of the voting public is in favor of a public option, which despite your attempt to make a competitive option sound like a gov't takeover of US healthcare, isn't. So, what you're saying is that 70% of the voting public has no intelligence. Quite a statement. -- Nom=de=Plume |
Don't follow our example
"Frogwatch" wrote in message
... I am trying to figure out what Obama could possibly say to schoolchildren when he seems to have no qualifications on education. Yeah! He only taught Constitutional law. Nothing to do with education there. I taught college physics, certainly more useful than teaching law but that does not make me an expert on education AND there is that record of failure of his. According to you. I guess that constitutional law isn't too important then... something that directly impacts us on a daily basis. You're not an expert in education, neither is Obama and neither were the Bushs or Reagan. But it was ok for them to talk about doing well in school, but it's not ok for Obama. AND, what record of failure are you talking about? He excelled in school... Honestly, it's not even clear what you've written, since it was written none to well. No offense intended. -- Nom=de=Plume |
Don't follow our example
"Frogwatch" wrote in message
... As I have pointed out, the only thing Obama has consistently done is to fail. Do you truly want such an abject failure trying to motivate your kids? Yeah, I guess getting elected president is a failure. I guess getting elected to the Senate is a failure. I guess graduating from Columbia and Harvard, and him being the head of president of the Harvard Law Review are all failures! Please give us some comparison to your own life or that of someone else you admire. I'd like to be sure I understand your comment. -- Nom=de=Plume |
Don't follow our example
"John H." wrote in message
... I am trying to figure out what Obama could possibly say to schoolchildren when he seems to have no qualifications on education. Do you think you would feel qualified as an educator if you'd been employed for several years as a professor of constitutional law? Are you still popping your wife's pain meds? A professor of constitutional law is in no way qualified to teach K-12 in the Virginia public schools, and I doubt if he would be qualified in any other state. Of course, Chicago would probably hire him. I guess you've never had the opportunity to have a guest lecturer on campus. Is teaching what he's doing or is he giving a talk about why education is important? Ummm... let's see. Nice strawman though. I would have no problems with him providing any university with a lesson plan and a televised speech. Neither would I. What's your point? -- Nom=de=Plume |
Don't follow our example
On Sat, 5 Sep 2009 13:54:19 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote: "John H." wrote in message .. . I am trying to figure out what Obama could possibly say to schoolchildren when he seems to have no qualifications on education. Do you think you would feel qualified as an educator if you'd been employed for several years as a professor of constitutional law? Are you still popping your wife's pain meds? A professor of constitutional law is in no way qualified to teach K-12 in the Virginia public schools, and I doubt if he would be qualified in any other state. Of course, Chicago would probably hire him. I guess you've never had the opportunity to have a guest lecturer on campus. Is teaching what he's doing or is he giving a talk about why education is important? Ummm... let's see. Nice strawman though. I would have no problems with him providing any university with a lesson plan and a televised speech. Neither would I. What's your point? Herring doesn't have points, other than talking. |
Don't follow our example
On Sat, 5 Sep 2009 13:42:59 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote: "Frogwatch" wrote in message ... Are you a birther or a bircher? It's hard to figure it out from your diatribe. I guess it was ok for Reagan and both Bushs to talk to kids, as they were Republicans. -- Nom=de=Plume Reagan and Bush's depts of ed did not issue soviet-like directives about their speeches. They also did not issue north korean-like presidential worship lesson plans. This is just looney... you can *say* this, but that doesn't make it true. Most of us have no problems with the pres speaking to the kids but the way it has been done is like something from North Korea and shows how completely incompetant this administration is. Apparently it was ok when Reagan talked about his tax-cut proposals to kids and when Bush the First asked kids to write him with how they could help him. But, it's not ok when Obama does this. Quite frankly, the Obama admin seems to be composed of total morons. Compared to what? Bush II? There is no possible way that anybody with any intelligence would allow these people to get anywhere near their health care. It would not matter if 99% of voters voted for Obama and still supported him, the other 1% should use any means necessary to prevent their lives being put in danger by having morons running health care. You do not allow the inmates of an asylum to run around with loaded guns no matter how they vote. Over 70% of the voting public is in favor of a public option, which despite your attempt to make a competitive option sound like a gov't takeover of US healthcare, isn't. So, what you're saying is that 70% of the voting public has no intelligence. Quite a statement. Statements coming from the right don't have to be true. They just have to stir up some emotion that's sitting deep inside these sore losers and bigots. |
Don't follow our example
On Sep 5, 5:07*pm, jps wrote:
On Sat, 5 Sep 2009 13:42:59 -0700, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "Frogwatch" wrote in message .... Are you a birther or a bircher? It's hard to figure it out from your diatribe. I guess it was ok for Reagan and both Bushs to talk to kids, as they were Republicans. -- Nom=de=Plume Reagan and Bush's depts of ed did not issue soviet-like directives about their speeches. *They also did not issue north korean-like presidential worship lesson plans. This is just looney... you can *say* this, but that doesn't make it true.. Most of us have no problems with the pres speaking to the kids but the way it has been done is like something from North Korea and shows how completely incompetant this administration is. Apparently it was ok when Reagan talked about his tax-cut proposals to kids and when Bush the First asked kids to write him with how they could help him. But, it's not ok when Obama does this. Quite frankly, the Obama admin seems to be composed of total morons. Compared to what? Bush II? There is no possible way that anybody with any intelligence would allow these people to get anywhere near their health care. *It would not matter if 99% of voters voted for Obama and still supported him, the other 1% should use any means necessary to prevent their lives being put in danger by having morons running health care. *You do not allow the inmates of an asylum to run around with loaded guns no matter how they vote. Over 70% of the voting public is in favor of a public option, which despite your attempt to make a competitive option sound like a gov't takeover of US healthcare, isn't. So, what you're saying is that 70% of the voting public has no intelligence. Quite a statement. Statements coming from the right don't have to be true. * They just have to stir up some emotion that's sitting deep inside these sore losers and bigots. Except for running for office, Obama's entire life has been a complete failure. Getting a law degree, no big deal, that is for slightly motivated people who simply are not smart enough to do science, engineering or run a business. Before running for office, he ran the Chicago Annenberg Challenge and was a total failure. He was a failure as a senator and as a president. Teaching a college class does not mean anything about high school education. BTW, my brother and sister were editors of Law review at FSU and Uof F and both say it is a role for suckers that looks good on a resume but is otherwise meaningless. His entire approach to this speech has been clueless in the extreme. The Soviet-like directive to school systems that seem guaranteed to cause problems and the worshipful lesson plans were done so badly as to make one wonder about his sanity and intelligence. However, I do not wonder, it is plain to me that he is simply stupid. Bush was a genius by comparison. Bozoma cannot get anything done even though his party controls both houses of congress while Bush got most of what he wanted even when the Dems controlled both houses. Oboma is simply stupid and has surrounded himself by people are more so. |
Don't follow our example
Frogwatch wrote:
Except for running for office, Obama's entire life has been a complete failure. Getting a law degree, no big deal, that is for slightly motivated people who simply are not smart enough to do science, engineering or run a business. Well, now you are devolving down into moron status. Good work. -- Birther-Deather-Tenther-Teabagger: Idiots All |
Don't follow our example
On Sat, 5 Sep 2009 16:19:07 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch
wrote: Except for running for office, Obama's entire life has been a complete failure. Right. POTUS. A failed life. Sure. Get over your jealousy. You know, if you take care of yourself, who's prez don't matter. Just work around it, taking advantage when you can. Did you get some of that cash-for-clunkers gravy? How about some of that BOA or Ford stock? You can short what you think will go down. The Wall Street casino is alive and kicking. Maybe do some real estate speculation. Work your business into defense contracts, or healthcare. Take some personal responsibility. Use your imagination. Blaming your shortcomings on Obama won't work any better than blaming them on Bush. Crybabys don't go far in life. Okay, no more preaching. Hey, I'm going to Florida next week. Gonna be fun. Fishing. No caving. --Vic |
Don't follow our example
"Frogwatch" wrote in message
... Except for running for office, Obama's entire life has been a complete failure. snip You should be so fortunate to be such a "failure." We all should. -- Nom=de=Plume |
Don't follow our example
jps wrote:
On Sat, 05 Sep 2009 16:06:45 -0400, Keith Nuttle wrote: jps wrote: On Sat, 5 Sep 2009 11:31:17 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch wrote: I am trying to figure out what Obama could possibly say to schoolchildren when he seems to have no qualifications on education. Do you think you would feel qualified as an educator if you'd been employed for several years as a professor of constitutional law? Are you still popping your wife's pain meds? Was obama a professor of Constitutional law? From his actions he and biden appear to have no knowledge that the US Constitution exist. We're not talking about Biden. The specific complaint was the he has no basis for addressing school children since he has qualifications as a teacher. Do you something to refute my assertion that he has every qualification to think of himself as a teacher as a result of having been paid as a professor or constitutional law at a university? Besides that, he's the leader of our country. The problem here is that some folks can't get over that there's a black man in the White House and some folks are just sour grapes losers who can't get over the fact that their party is woefully out of power. Bigots and sore losers. What a team. So he can't be criticized for his failures because he's 1/2 black? You must be joking. |
Don't follow our example
jps wrote:
On Sat, 5 Sep 2009 13:54:19 -0700, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "John H." wrote in message ... I am trying to figure out what Obama could possibly say to schoolchildren when he seems to have no qualifications on education. Do you think you would feel qualified as an educator if you'd been employed for several years as a professor of constitutional law? Are you still popping your wife's pain meds? A professor of constitutional law is in no way qualified to teach K-12 in the Virginia public schools, and I doubt if he would be qualified in any other state. Of course, Chicago would probably hire him. I guess you've never had the opportunity to have a guest lecturer on campus. Is teaching what he's doing or is he giving a talk about why education is important? Ummm... let's see. Nice strawman though. I would have no problems with him providing any university with a lesson plan and a televised speech. Neither would I. What's your point? Herring doesn't have points, other than talking. Like Obama??? |
Don't follow our example
On Sep 5, 8:15*pm, Vic Smith wrote:
On Sat, 5 Sep 2009 16:19:07 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch wrote: Except for running for office, Obama's entire life has been a complete failure. Right. POTUS. A failed life. Sure. Get over your jealousy. You know, if you take care of yourself, who's prez don't matter. Just work around it, taking advantage when you can. Did you get some of that cash-for-clunkers gravy? How about some of that BOA or Ford stock? You can short what you think will go down. The Wall Street casino is alive and kicking. Maybe do some real estate speculation. Work your business into defense contracts, or healthcare. Take some personal responsibility. *Use your imagination. Blaming your shortcomings on Obama won't work any better than blaming them on Bush. Crybabys don't go far in life. Okay, no more preaching. Hey, I'm going to Florida next week. *Gonna be fun. Fishing. *No caving. --Vic Water is too high for caving around here right now. Still kinda hot but not too bad. Where you gonna fish? |
Don't follow our example
On Sep 5, 9:21*pm, Frogwatch wrote:
On Sep 5, 8:15*pm, Vic Smith wrote: On Sat, 5 Sep 2009 16:19:07 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch wrote: Except for running for office, Obama's entire life has been a complete failure. Right. POTUS. A failed life. Sure. Get over your jealousy. You know, if you take care of yourself, who's prez don't matter. Just work around it, taking advantage when you can. Did you get some of that cash-for-clunkers gravy? How about some of that BOA or Ford stock? You can short what you think will go down. The Wall Street casino is alive and kicking. Maybe do some real estate speculation. Work your business into defense contracts, or healthcare. Take some personal responsibility. *Use your imagination. Blaming your shortcomings on Obama won't work any better than blaming them on Bush. Crybabys don't go far in life. Okay, no more preaching. Hey, I'm going to Florida next week. *Gonna be fun. Fishing. *No caving. --Vic Water is too high for caving around here right now. *Still kinda hot but not too bad. *Where you gonna fish? Hey Vic: If you get up this way, I'll take you out on the Tolman and you can teach me how to fish. |
Don't follow our example
On Sat, 5 Sep 2009 18:33:15 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch
wrote: Hey Vic: If you get up this way, I'll take you out on the Tolman and you can teach me how to fish. How about you and the wife coming down to Punta Gorda for a day or two. There's an extra bedroom/bath in the condo and my wife's a good cook. Professional cook. We can do some fishing out back in the canal, and take a trip on this: http://www.capttonys.com/prices.html I'm going to be down there from the 16th to the 2nd. We can play it by ear. Only other thing I'm planning is a couple days in the Keys. You don't need a fishing license for the head boat, but I'm getting one anyway for any other fishing I do down there. Nothing to fishing the way I do it. Put some shrimp or squid on the hook and toss it out. Repeat as necessary. Can't make it like work. I'll have extra rods/reels, but for the head boat I'll use their gear. It's usually heavy enough to horse anything in. --Vic |
Don't follow our example
On Sat, 05 Sep 2009 20:31:25 -0400, D 2 wrote:
jps wrote: On Sat, 5 Sep 2009 13:54:19 -0700, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "John H." wrote in message ... I am trying to figure out what Obama could possibly say to schoolchildren when he seems to have no qualifications on education. Do you think you would feel qualified as an educator if you'd been employed for several years as a professor of constitutional law? Are you still popping your wife's pain meds? A professor of constitutional law is in no way qualified to teach K-12 in the Virginia public schools, and I doubt if he would be qualified in any other state. Of course, Chicago would probably hire him. I guess you've never had the opportunity to have a guest lecturer on campus. Is teaching what he's doing or is he giving a talk about why education is important? Ummm... let's see. Nice strawman though. I would have no problems with him providing any university with a lesson plan and a televised speech. Neither would I. What's your point? Herring doesn't have points, other than talking. Like Obama??? No. I quit smoking. And I'm not half anything. -- John H All decisions, even those made by liberals, are the result of binary thinking. |
Don't follow our example
jps wrote:
On Sat, 5 Sep 2009 13:10:27 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch wrote: On Sep 5, 3:38 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "Frogwatch" wrote in message ... I am trying to figure out what Obama could possibly say to schoolchildren when he seems to have no qualifications on education. Yeah! He only taught Constitutional law. Nothing to do with education there. snip The "Let's Worship Obama" lesson plan would not produce admiration from kids in High School, it would produce contempt. Their failure to recognize this places them so far out from reality as to clearly illustrate their incompetance. I can guarantee that after doing this worshipful worksheet, high school kids are going to go out and burn as much gas as they can just to rebel against stupidity. High School kids are going to listen to him and do this BS work and then think "Somewhere in Kenya a village is missing it's idiot". I have no problem with this as it will cause these kids to vote against liberal stupidity when they turn 18 but it does show that the USA is in real trouble right now. Are you a birther or a bircher? It's hard to figure it out from your diatribe. I guess it was ok for Reagan and both Bushs to talk to kids, as they were Republicans. -- Nom=de=Plume Reagan and Bush's depts of ed did not issue soviet-like directives about their speeches. According to you, internationally recognized authority on propaganda. Truth is, each of the Republican presidents used the pulpit to forward their agendas with school children. Some of us were adult enough to hold our noses and let the kids hear what they had to say. The infantile response of the "conservative" base is mind blowing. Grow up and get over the fact that your party is in shambles and has lost control of the country. And thank God it's in smarter hands. If you will read the news in the real world the Republican party is not in shambles that it is suppose in the virtual world. The last I heard there are at least 23 seats that will be transfered to the Republican party in 2010. Many analyst are predicting that the Republican party will take control of both houses. Historically the out party has replaced the in party after presidential election of a new President. |
Don't follow our example
On Sat, 5 Sep 2009 16:19:07 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch
wrote: On Sep 5, 5:07*pm, jps wrote: On Sat, 5 Sep 2009 13:42:59 -0700, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "Frogwatch" wrote in message ... Are you a birther or a bircher? It's hard to figure it out from your diatribe. I guess it was ok for Reagan and both Bushs to talk to kids, as they were Republicans. -- Nom=de=Plume Reagan and Bush's depts of ed did not issue soviet-like directives about their speeches. *They also did not issue north korean-like presidential worship lesson plans. This is just looney... you can *say* this, but that doesn't make it true. Most of us have no problems with the pres speaking to the kids but the way it has been done is like something from North Korea and shows how completely incompetant this administration is. Apparently it was ok when Reagan talked about his tax-cut proposals to kids and when Bush the First asked kids to write him with how they could help him. But, it's not ok when Obama does this. Quite frankly, the Obama admin seems to be composed of total morons. Compared to what? Bush II? There is no possible way that anybody with any intelligence would allow these people to get anywhere near their health care. *It would not matter if 99% of voters voted for Obama and still supported him, the other 1% should use any means necessary to prevent their lives being put in danger by having morons running health care. *You do not allow the inmates of an asylum to run around with loaded guns no matter how they vote. Over 70% of the voting public is in favor of a public option, which despite your attempt to make a competitive option sound like a gov't takeover of US healthcare, isn't. So, what you're saying is that 70% of the voting public has no intelligence. Quite a statement. Statements coming from the right don't have to be true. * They just have to stir up some emotion that's sitting deep inside these sore losers and bigots. Except for running for office, Obama's entire life has been a complete failure. You could disuade anyone from taking you seriously with these stupid statements. His law degree is from among the top schools in the country, having also been elected to head the most prestigious higher ed publication about the law. He's now the President of the United States, leader of the free world and likely the most influential person in the world. If he did not another thing in his life, he'd be considered wildly successful. Oh, don't forget about the two bestselling books. I don't understand how you can be so dense, but you've successfully proven it's possible. |
Don't follow our example
On Sat, 5 Sep 2009 18:33:15 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch
wrote: On Sep 5, 9:21*pm, Frogwatch wrote: On Sep 5, 8:15*pm, Vic Smith wrote: On Sat, 5 Sep 2009 16:19:07 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch wrote: Except for running for office, Obama's entire life has been a complete failure. Right. POTUS. A failed life. Sure. Get over your jealousy. You know, if you take care of yourself, who's prez don't matter. Just work around it, taking advantage when you can. Did you get some of that cash-for-clunkers gravy? How about some of that BOA or Ford stock? You can short what you think will go down. The Wall Street casino is alive and kicking. Maybe do some real estate speculation. Work your business into defense contracts, or healthcare. Take some personal responsibility. *Use your imagination. Blaming your shortcomings on Obama won't work any better than blaming them on Bush. Crybabys don't go far in life. Okay, no more preaching. Hey, I'm going to Florida next week. *Gonna be fun. Fishing. *No caving. --Vic Water is too high for caving around here right now. *Still kinda hot but not too bad. *Where you gonna fish? Hey Vic: If you get up this way, I'll take you out on the Tolman and you can teach me how to fish. It'd be a better investment if he taught you how to think. |
Don't follow our example
On Sat, 5 Sep 2009 13:52:15 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote: "Frogwatch" wrote in message ... As I have pointed out, the only thing Obama has consistently done is to fail. Do you truly want such an abject failure trying to motivate your kids? Yeah, I guess getting elected president is a failure. I guess getting elected to the Senate is a failure. I guess graduating from Columbia and Harvard, and him being the head of president of the Harvard Law Review are all failures! Please give us some comparison to your own life or that of someone else you admire. I'd like to be sure I understand your comment. I'm hearing crickets. Clearly can't back up these idiotic statements. Is he trolling or really that dense? |
Don't follow our example
"jps" wrote in message
... He's now the President of the United States, leader of the free world and likely the most influential person in the world. If he did not another thing in his life, he'd be considered wildly successful. Not a chance! That would be Michael Jackson. lol -- Nom=de=Plume |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:22 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com