Congress still denying health care
 

On Sep 5, 8:27*am, "Steve" wrote:
On *4-Sep-2009, Jack wrote:

The hell it doesn't. *It's in the Preamble, right after "provide for the
common defence". *It's "promote the general Welfare".

While you guys would love to spin it that way, you damn well know the
founding fathers didn't intend that statement to mean that the gov is
supposed to provide health care or heath insurance to its people.
Health insurance didn't even exist in the US when this was written.

You're fooling no one. *You're either being disingenuous, or you're a
socialist idiot.

The stupidity promoted by them simply shows many people are evolving in
reverse. This is reinforced by their staring at an idiot box and thinking
they are informed.

They've been sold this ideology by it being repeated to them many
times, and then they believe it. Now they think they can do the same
to thinking people, but they cannot.

Congress still denying health care
 

Jack wrote:
On Sep 5, 8:27 am, "Steve" wrote:
On 4-Sep-2009, Jack wrote:

The hell it doesn't. It's in the Preamble, right after "provide for the
common defence". It's "promote the general Welfare".
While you guys would love to spin it that way, you damn well know the
founding fathers didn't intend that statement to mean that the gov is
supposed to provide health care or heath insurance to its people.
Health insurance didn't even exist in the US when this was written.
You're fooling no one. You're either being disingenuous, or you're a
socialist idiot.
The stupidity promoted by them simply shows many people are evolving in
reverse. This is reinforced by their staring at an idiot box and thinking
they are informed.

They've been sold this ideology by it being repeated to them many
times, and then they believe it. Now they think they can do the same
to thinking people, but they cannot.



Isn't it great when the right-wing retards get together to reinforce
each other's nonsense? I'm sure herring and justwaitafreak will chime in
here, too.

--
Birther-Deather-Tenther
Idiots All

Congress still denying health care
 

In article ,
says...

On 4-Sep-2009, Jack wrote:

The hell it doesn't. *It's in the Preamble, right after "provide for the
common defence". *It's "promote the general Welfare".

While you guys would love to spin it that way, you damn well know the
founding fathers didn't intend that statement to mean that the gov is
supposed to provide health care or heath insurance to its people.
Health insurance didn't even exist in the US when this was written.

You're fooling no one. You're either being disingenuous, or you're a
socialist idiot.

The stupidity promoted by them simply shows many people are evolving in
reverse. This is reinforced by their staring at an idiot box and thinking
they are informed.

Please do list us where you get your "real" information... New York
Lies? MSNBC/GE/DNC? The Daily Kos? Jay Lenno???

--
Wafa free since 2009

Congress still denying health care
 

On 5-Sep-2009, H the K wrote:

clause, n.

(klɔ�z)

Also 4–6 claus, 5 clawse, clausse.

[a. OF. clause, ad. late or med.L. clausa, app. in sense of L. clausula
close of a period or formula, conclusion, clause, dim. of *clausa,
itself not recorded as n. in ancient Latin; f. L. claudĕre, claus-um to
close. Cf. Pr. clauza; It. uses clausula.]

1. a.1.a A short sentence; a single passage or member of a discourse or
writing; a distinct part or member of a sentence, esp. in Gramm.
Analysis, one containing a subject and predicate. Also attrib. and Comb.
clause, n.

* Date: 14th century
Idiot:

1: usually offensive : a person affected with extreme mental retardation
2 : a foolish or stupid person

— idiot adjective

Congress still denying health care
 

On 5-Sep-2009, BAR wrote:

Government lackey or union clown "member?"


Moron.

Meaninig H K cannot rebut your facts.

Facts are extremely frustrating to the misguided and ignorant masses.

Congress still denying health care
 

On 5-Sep-2009, H the K wrote:

Meaninig H K cannot rebut your facts.



There's no need to "rebut" morons.

"It's not a 'clause'"

impossible task: 299 million in the U.S. alone. Sand that's very generous.

Congress still denying health care
 

On 5-Sep-2009, thunder wrote:

Seeing the Preamble has "ZERO weight", I guess that's why our Founding
Fathers specifically repeated parts of it when enumerating the Powers of
Congress.

Sec. 8
The Congress shall have Power To lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts
and Excises, to pay the Debts and provide for the common Defence and
general Welfare of the United States; but all Duties, Imposts and Excises
shall be uniform throughout the United States;

There's that pesky "general Welfare" again.

To pretend to agree with such stupidity, food, then shelter, is more
important than medical service. When your lackeys impose "free" food and
shelter, I'll address keeping the nonproductive masses alive.

Congress still denying health care
 

On 5-Sep-2009, Jack wrote:

The stupidity promoted by them simply shows many people are evolving in
reverse. This is reinforced by their staring at an idiot box and
thinking
they are informed.

They've been sold this ideology by it being repeated to them many
times, and then they believe it. Now they think they can do the same
to thinking people, but they cannot.

They're actually doing a decent job. About 130 million people voted for
Buckwheat or Mr. Magoo. That explains the root of the problem.

Congress still denying health care
 

On 5-Sep-2009, JustWait wrote:

The stupidity promoted by them simply shows many people are evolving in
reverse. This is reinforced by their staring at an idiot box and
thinking
they are informed.

Please do list us where you get your "real" information... New York
Lies? MSNBC/GE/DNC? The Daily Kos? Jay Lenno???

Interesting list of misinformation. Do those itemize your list of sources?
It explains a lot.

How did you get enough money to input text in a news group? Rent-to-own???
Are you at a library?

Congress still denying health care
 

"Steve" wrote in message
...
It's not a "clause," (hahahahaha....idiot) article or amendment. It's in
the
introduction, formally known as the preamble. It carries no weight
whatsoever, even IF you were coherent.

Government lackey or union clown "member?"


You are completely wrong. Here's the link.

http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/data/c...tion/preamble/

--
Nom=de=Plume