|
Liberals are against school prayer...
On Sun, 06 Sep 2009 10:20:41 -0400, Gene
wrote: On Sat, 05 Sep 2009 13:31:11 -0400, John H. wrote: As I've said several times, there is only one person using the phrase 'kill the elderly' - you. Apparently you think it's cute. I think it's stupid. Maybe you don't really want to know or just aren't paying attention! According to Google, there are about 371,994 other references..... http://raymondpronk.wordpress.com/20...ur-time-is-up/ http://www.thefinalprayer.com/2009/0...derly-exposed/ http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pb368Ek_4vw http://www.mixx.com/stories/6985366/...sed_nazi_obama http://brewcitybrawler.typepad.com/b...e-elderly.html http://www.facebook.com/note.php?note_id=113851103434 I didn't bother checking, but how many of those are from this newsgroup? -- John H "Vote for a Democrat, it's easier than working!" |
Liberals are against school prayer...
In article ,
says... On Sun, 6 Sep 2009 11:42:32 -0400, JustWait wrote: In article , says... On Sun, 6 Sep 2009 10:35:22 -0400, JustWait wrote: In article , says... On Sat, 05 Sep 2009 13:31:11 -0400, John H. wrote: As I've said several times, there is only one person using the phrase 'kill the elderly' - you. Apparently you think it's cute. I think it's stupid. Maybe you don't really want to know or just aren't paying attention! According to Google, there are about 371,994 other references..... http://raymondpronk.wordpress.com/20...ur-time-is-up/ http://www.thefinalprayer.com/2009/0...derly-exposed/ http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pb368Ek_4vw http://www.mixx.com/stories/6985366/...sed_nazi_obama http://brewcitybrawler.typepad.com/b...e-elderly.html http://www.facebook.com/note.php?note_id=113851103434 The question is weather John or I have said it... The answer is still, NO! Well, you have to admit that both of you got fast and loose with words: substituting death for end of life... the connotations are hugely diverse and mirrored the false talking points of some folks with an agenda. Fair and Balanced: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009...reform-debate/ vs. reality: http://www.facebook.com/note.php?not...8572414&ref=mf The "end of life" stuff was signed into law by H. W. Bush in 1992 and has been out there for nearly two decades. Nobody said squat then, now it is all some folks can talk about... most of whom are, now, talking out of the OTHER side of their mouth. So, what changed? What has changed is that a majority of Americans, liberal and conservative don't trust the folks who will be in charge... Rangle, Pelosi, Reid, Soros, Frank, Dodd, Kerry, Murtha, do not represent the interests of the American people, that is what changed... Taken at face value.... So, that justifies making up fake, false, and misleading stuff to disparage them? Please enlighten me, what have I made up? I was answering a question based on my opinion of what I have seen and read... What do you suppose those fallacious comments do towards instilling trust in those you are trying to sway toward your viewpoint? -- Wafa free since 2009 |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:09 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com