On Thu, 3 Sep 2009 20:48:03 -0400, JustWait
wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Thu, 3 Sep 2009 11:01:43 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

"John H." wrote in message
.. .
Read up:

Occam's razor http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Occam%27s_Razor

Theory of Evolution http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evolution

Gosh, the more you read, the more you can see what a wonderful plan it
was!


So, basically you're saying that you're unwilling to examine your deeply
held beliefs, even when presented with arguments and facts that are in
opposition?

First, you've no idea what I believe.

Second, you've presented that refutes the possibility of a plan.
--


I'm getting a better idea, especially if you keep claiming things that
aren't true. I never said, for example, that there's no possibility of a
"plan." I think you need to re-read both articles, especially the Occam's
razor one.

Well good, maybe we can agree there was a great plan. Not sure what my
'claim' was, however.

Oh, please change the second sentence above to, "Second, you've
presented nothing that refutes the possibility of a plan. This
'nothing' includes the Occam's razor and evolution articles.


Clearly, you haven't read or don't understand the concept of Occam's razor.

BTW, you really ought to acknowledge Harry's name-calling. He's pretty
special, you know.

We really never see it... From what I can see, the Pink Army is pretty
much giving up as nobody, and I mean nobody but they, give a flying ****
what they say... Like I have said before, why would anybody want to
waste time with WF3, and the pink army? I don't deal with liars, drunks,
junkies, or cowards... I pity them, but really have no time for them...

I just added wf3yh to the list. Got rid of 80+ posts in about half a
milllesecond. Aren't 'puters great?
--
John H

All decisions, even those made by liberals, are the result of binary thinking.