| Page 2 of 2 | 1 | 2 |
|
|
Got daughters involved in college sports?
On Wed, 2 Sep 2009 13:31:34 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote: "John H." wrote in message .. . On Wed, 2 Sep 2009 10:35:00 -0700, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "John H." wrote in message ... I think Liberty U teaches that science supports the concept of intelligent design. There's no reputable science that supports that notion. As Ben Stein, speaking on the theory of evolution, once said, "It would be the approximate equivalent of a tornado passing over a junk yard and leaving a fully finished 777 jetliner in an airport right next to it." Ben Stein knows nothing about which he speaks, and assuming this is his quote, it makes no sense at all, and it has nothing to do with evolution, which is a proven and provable fact. Evolution *was* well planned, wasn't it? Read up: Occam's razor http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Occam%27s_Razor Theory of Evolution http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evolution Gosh, the more you read, the more you can see what a wonderful plan it was! -- John H All decisions, even those made by liberals, are the result of binary thinking. |
Got daughters involved in college sports?
wrote in message
... I'll take you at your word, but you also attempted to go after me with some ideological label re the "shrine" comment. That's better left to shrill and timid people. I find it odd that anyone would speak of any politician affectionately, unless those person were immediately related. I also think it odd for any person to idolize another person, regardless of stature and estate, unless the other person is immediate family. Why? What if that person helped you, your family, another relation, or just a friend. Wouldn't you mentioned it after he or she died? Where do you get the "idolize" part? Someone else is talking about a shrine in the basement. I'm talking about acknowledging someone's accomplishments. -- Nom=de=Plume |
Got daughters involved in college sports?
"John H." wrote in message
... Read up: Occam's razor http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Occam%27s_Razor Theory of Evolution http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evolution Gosh, the more you read, the more you can see what a wonderful plan it was! So, basically you're saying that you're unwilling to examine your deeply held beliefs, even when presented with arguments and facts that are in opposition? -- Nom=de=Plume |
Got daughters involved in college sports?
On Wed, 2 Sep 2009 17:00:15 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote: "John H." wrote in message .. . Read up: Occam's razor http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Occam%27s_Razor Theory of Evolution http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evolution Gosh, the more you read, the more you can see what a wonderful plan it was! So, basically you're saying that you're unwilling to examine your deeply held beliefs, even when presented with arguments and facts that are in opposition? First, you've no idea what I believe. Second, you've presented that refutes the possibility of a plan. -- John H All decisions, even those made by liberals, are the result of binary thinking. |
Got daughters involved in college sports?
"John H." wrote in message
... On Wed, 2 Sep 2009 17:00:15 -0700, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "John H." wrote in message . .. Read up: Occam's razor http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Occam%27s_Razor Theory of Evolution http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evolution Gosh, the more you read, the more you can see what a wonderful plan it was! So, basically you're saying that you're unwilling to examine your deeply held beliefs, even when presented with arguments and facts that are in opposition? First, you've no idea what I believe. Second, you've presented that refutes the possibility of a plan. -- I'm getting a better idea, especially if you keep claiming things that aren't true. I never said, for example, that there's no possibility of a "plan." I think you need to re-read both articles, especially the Occam's razor one. -- Nom=de=Plume |
Got daughters involved in college sports?
|
Got daughters involved in college sports?
"John H." wrote in message
... Read up: Occam's razor http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Occam%27s_Razor Theory of Evolution http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evolution Gosh, the more you read, the more you can see what a wonderful plan it was! So, basically you're saying that you're unwilling to examine your deeply held beliefs, even when presented with arguments and facts that are in opposition? First, you've no idea what I believe. Second, you've presented that refutes the possibility of a plan. -- I'm getting a better idea, especially if you keep claiming things that aren't true. I never said, for example, that there's no possibility of a "plan." I think you need to re-read both articles, especially the Occam's razor one. Well good, maybe we can agree there was a great plan. Not sure what my 'claim' was, however. Oh, please change the second sentence above to, "Second, you've presented nothing that refutes the possibility of a plan. This 'nothing' includes the Occam's razor and evolution articles. Clearly, you haven't read or don't understand the concept of Occam's razor. -- Nom=de=Plume |
Got daughters involved in college sports?
nom=de=plume wrote:
"John H." wrote in message ... Read up: Occam's razor http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Occam%27s_Razor Theory of Evolution http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evolution Gosh, the more you read, the more you can see what a wonderful plan it was! So, basically you're saying that you're unwilling to examine your deeply held beliefs, even when presented with arguments and facts that are in opposition? First, you've no idea what I believe. Second, you've presented that refutes the possibility of a plan. -- I'm getting a better idea, especially if you keep claiming things that aren't true. I never said, for example, that there's no possibility of a "plan." I think you need to re-read both articles, especially the Occam's razor one. Well good, maybe we can agree there was a great plan. Not sure what my 'claim' was, however. Oh, please change the second sentence above to, "Second, you've presented nothing that refutes the possibility of a plan. This 'nothing' includes the Occam's razor and evolution articles. Clearly, you haven't read or don't understand the concept of Occam's razor. Herring is a racist. Why would he understand concepts more abstract than racism? |
Got daughters involved in college sports?
On Thu, 3 Sep 2009 11:01:43 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote: "John H." wrote in message .. . Read up: Occam's razor http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Occam%27s_Razor Theory of Evolution http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evolution Gosh, the more you read, the more you can see what a wonderful plan it was! So, basically you're saying that you're unwilling to examine your deeply held beliefs, even when presented with arguments and facts that are in opposition? First, you've no idea what I believe. Second, you've presented that refutes the possibility of a plan. -- I'm getting a better idea, especially if you keep claiming things that aren't true. I never said, for example, that there's no possibility of a "plan." I think you need to re-read both articles, especially the Occam's razor one. Well good, maybe we can agree there was a great plan. Not sure what my 'claim' was, however. Oh, please change the second sentence above to, "Second, you've presented nothing that refutes the possibility of a plan. This 'nothing' includes the Occam's razor and evolution articles. Clearly, you haven't read or don't understand the concept of Occam's razor. More tap dancing. There's nothing there that precludes a plan. A pretty well thought out plan, actually., -- John H All decisions, even those made by liberals, are the result of binary thinking. |
Got daughters involved in college sports?
On Thu, 3 Sep 2009 11:01:43 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote: "John H." wrote in message .. . Read up: Occam's razor http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Occam%27s_Razor Theory of Evolution http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evolution Gosh, the more you read, the more you can see what a wonderful plan it was! So, basically you're saying that you're unwilling to examine your deeply held beliefs, even when presented with arguments and facts that are in opposition? First, you've no idea what I believe. Second, you've presented that refutes the possibility of a plan. -- I'm getting a better idea, especially if you keep claiming things that aren't true. I never said, for example, that there's no possibility of a "plan." I think you need to re-read both articles, especially the Occam's razor one. Well good, maybe we can agree there was a great plan. Not sure what my 'claim' was, however. Oh, please change the second sentence above to, "Second, you've presented nothing that refutes the possibility of a plan. This 'nothing' includes the Occam's razor and evolution articles. Clearly, you haven't read or don't understand the concept of Occam's razor. BTW, you really ought to acknowledge Harry's name-calling. He's pretty special, you know. -- John H All decisions, even those made by liberals, are the result of binary thinking. |
Got daughters involved in college sports?
"John H." wrote in message
... Clearly, you haven't read or don't understand the concept of Occam's razor. More tap dancing. There's nothing there that precludes a plan. A pretty well thought out plan, actually., Correct. There's absolutely nothing that precludes a plan. It's just not the simplest, most straight-forward explanation, which is exactly what Occam's razor is all about. -- Nom=de=Plume |
Got daughters involved in college sports?
"John H." wrote in message
... BTW, you really ought to acknowledge Harry's name-calling. He's pretty special, you know. I don't believe in name-calling no matter who does it. -- Nom=de=Plume |
Got daughters involved in college sports?
On Thu, 3 Sep 2009 13:09:44 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote: "John H." wrote in message .. . Clearly, you haven't read or don't understand the concept of Occam's razor. More tap dancing. There's nothing there that precludes a plan. A pretty well thought out plan, actually., Correct. There's absolutely nothing that precludes a plan. It's just not the simplest, most straight-forward explanation, which is exactly what Occam's razor is all about. Do you think randomness is more simple than a plan? -- John H All decisions, even those made by liberals, are the result of binary thinking. |
Got daughters involved in college sports?
"John H." wrote in message
... On Thu, 3 Sep 2009 13:09:44 -0700, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "John H." wrote in message . .. Clearly, you haven't read or don't understand the concept of Occam's razor. More tap dancing. There's nothing there that precludes a plan. A pretty well thought out plan, actually., Correct. There's absolutely nothing that precludes a plan. It's just not the simplest, most straight-forward explanation, which is exactly what Occam's razor is all about. Do you think randomness is more simple than a plan? Yes. Why would anyone think otherwise? (or is that the plan? lol) Now, ask me if I believe in God! -- Nom=de=Plume |
Got daughters involved in college sports?
On Thu, 3 Sep 2009 17:35:36 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote: "John H." wrote in message .. . On Thu, 3 Sep 2009 13:09:44 -0700, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "John H." wrote in message ... Clearly, you haven't read or don't understand the concept of Occam's razor. More tap dancing. There's nothing there that precludes a plan. A pretty well thought out plan, actually., Correct. There's absolutely nothing that precludes a plan. It's just not the simplest, most straight-forward explanation, which is exactly what Occam's razor is all about. Do you think randomness is more simple than a plan? Yes. Why would anyone think otherwise? (or is that the plan? lol) Now, ask me if I believe in God! I don't care what your religious beliefs may or may not be. If they're your *beliefs*, I'll not ridicule them. Of course, that doesn't mean I'll agree with them either. -- John H All decisions, even those made by liberals, are the result of binary thinking. |
Got daughters involved in college sports?
On Thu, 3 Sep 2009 20:48:03 -0400, JustWait
wrote: In article , says... On Thu, 3 Sep 2009 11:01:43 -0700, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "John H." wrote in message .. . Read up: Occam's razor http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Occam%27s_Razor Theory of Evolution http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evolution Gosh, the more you read, the more you can see what a wonderful plan it was! So, basically you're saying that you're unwilling to examine your deeply held beliefs, even when presented with arguments and facts that are in opposition? First, you've no idea what I believe. Second, you've presented that refutes the possibility of a plan. -- I'm getting a better idea, especially if you keep claiming things that aren't true. I never said, for example, that there's no possibility of a "plan." I think you need to re-read both articles, especially the Occam's razor one. Well good, maybe we can agree there was a great plan. Not sure what my 'claim' was, however. Oh, please change the second sentence above to, "Second, you've presented nothing that refutes the possibility of a plan. This 'nothing' includes the Occam's razor and evolution articles. Clearly, you haven't read or don't understand the concept of Occam's razor. BTW, you really ought to acknowledge Harry's name-calling. He's pretty special, you know. We really never see it... From what I can see, the Pink Army is pretty much giving up as nobody, and I mean nobody but they, give a flying **** what they say... Like I have said before, why would anybody want to waste time with WF3, and the pink army? I don't deal with liars, drunks, junkies, or cowards... I pity them, but really have no time for them... I just added wf3yh to the list. Got rid of 80+ posts in about half a milllesecond. Aren't 'puters great? -- John H All decisions, even those made by liberals, are the result of binary thinking. |
Got daughters involved in college sports?
In article ,
says... On Thu, 3 Sep 2009 20:48:03 -0400, JustWait wrote: In article , says... On Thu, 3 Sep 2009 11:01:43 -0700, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "John H." wrote in message .. . Read up: Occam's razor http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Occam%27s_Razor Theory of Evolution http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evolution Gosh, the more you read, the more you can see what a wonderful plan it was! So, basically you're saying that you're unwilling to examine your deeply held beliefs, even when presented with arguments and facts that are in opposition? First, you've no idea what I believe. Second, you've presented that refutes the possibility of a plan. -- I'm getting a better idea, especially if you keep claiming things that aren't true. I never said, for example, that there's no possibility of a "plan." I think you need to re-read both articles, especially the Occam's razor one. Well good, maybe we can agree there was a great plan. Not sure what my 'claim' was, however. Oh, please change the second sentence above to, "Second, you've presented nothing that refutes the possibility of a plan. This 'nothing' includes the Occam's razor and evolution articles. Clearly, you haven't read or don't understand the concept of Occam's razor. BTW, you really ought to acknowledge Harry's name-calling. He's pretty special, you know. We really never see it... From what I can see, the Pink Army is pretty much giving up as nobody, and I mean nobody but they, give a flying **** what they say... Like I have said before, why would anybody want to waste time with WF3, and the pink army? I don't deal with liars, drunks, junkies, or cowards... I pity them, but really have no time for them... I just added wf3yh to the list. Got rid of 80+ posts in about half a milllesecond. Aren't 'puters great? Yup... We still have plenty of honest if not misguided libs here to discuss things with, without name calling and outright lies about everything from screwdrivers to lobsta' boats... snerk -- Wafa free since 2009 |
Got daughters involved in college sports?
On Sep 3, 8:35*pm, JustWait wrote:
In article , says... On Thu, 3 Sep 2009 20:48:03 -0400, JustWait wrote: In article , says... On Thu, 3 Sep 2009 11:01:43 -0700, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "John H." wrote in message .. . Read up: Occam's razorhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Occam%27s_Razor Theory of Evolutionhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evolution Gosh, the more you read, the more you can see what a wonderful plan it was! So, basically you're saying that you're unwilling to examine your deeply held beliefs, even when presented with arguments and facts that are in opposition? First, you've no idea what I believe. Second, you've presented that refutes the possibility of a plan.. -- I'm getting a better idea, especially if you keep claiming things that aren't true. I never said, for example, that there's no possibility of a "plan." I think you need to re-read both articles, especially the Occam's razor one. Well good, maybe we can agree there was a great plan. Not sure what my 'claim' was, however. Oh, please change the second sentence above to, "Second, you've presented nothing that refutes the possibility of a plan. This 'nothing' includes the Occam's razor and evolution articles. Clearly, you haven't read or don't understand the concept of Occam's razor. BTW, you really ought to acknowledge Harry's name-calling. He's pretty special, you know. We really never see it... From what I can see, the Pink Army is pretty much giving up as nobody, and I mean nobody but they, give a flying **** what they say... Like I have said before, why would anybody want to waste time with WF3, and the pink army? I don't deal with liars, drunks, junkies, or cowards... I pity them, but really have no time for them.... I just added wf3yh to the list. Got rid of 80+ posts in about half a milllesecond. Aren't 'puters great? Yup... We still have plenty of honest if not misguided libs here to discuss things with, without name calling and outright lies about everything from screwdrivers to lobsta' boats... snerk -- Wafa free since 2009- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Agreed! |
Got daughters involved in college sports?
nom=de=plume wrote:
I don't suppose you're ignorant of what he actually did with his life. What did you do that even comes close? I'll bet he never left the scene of an accident to let a young girl die. Johnson |
Got daughters involved in college sports?
On Sun, 06 Sep 2009 08:13:52 -0400, Johnson
wrote: nom=de=plume wrote: I don't suppose you're ignorant of what he actually did with his life. What did you do that even comes close? I'll bet he never left the scene of an accident to let a young girl die. Johnson I think idol worshippers chalk that one up to 'youthful indiscretion.' -- Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service -------http://www.NewsDemon.com------ Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access |
Got daughters involved in college sports?
"Johnson" wrote in message
... nom=de=plume wrote: I don't suppose you're ignorant of what he actually did with his life. What did you do that even comes close? I'll bet he never left the scene of an accident to let a young girl die. Johnson Wow. Never heard that one before. Alert the media. -- Nom=de=Plume |
Got daughters involved in college sports?
On Aug 31, 8:47*pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:
wrote in message ... On Mon, 31 Aug 2009 13:19:53 -0700, "nom=de=plume" wrote: wrote in message . .. On Mon, 31 Aug 2009 10:47:15 -0400, H the K wrote: Thank a liberal. Have a daughter on the Supreme Court? Thank a Republican. Ginsberg? Sotomayor? The only other woman appointed was O'Connor, by Ronny Raygun. Nothing escapes you, I see. Are you attempting a personal attack? -- Nom=de=Plume Pennie, are you that defensive? |
Got daughters involved in college sports?
On Sep 2, 6:59*pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:
wrote in message ... I'll take you at your word, but you also attempted to go after me with some ideological label re the "shrine" comment. That's better left to shrill and timid people. I find it odd that anyone would speak of any politician affectionately, unless those person were immediately related. *I also think it odd for any person to idolize another person, regardless of stature and estate, unless the other person is immediate family. Why? What if that person helped you, your family, another relation, or just a friend. Wouldn't you mentioned it after he or she died? Where do you get the "idolize" part? Someone else is talking about a shrine in the basement. I'm talking about acknowledging someone's accomplishments. -- Nom=de=Plume The late senator was a popular statesman, yet had been known for his drunken licentiousness and dubious affairs. But otherwise he signed some good bills occasionally. |
Got daughters involved in college sports?
"TopBassDog" wrote in message
... Thank a liberal. Have a daughter on the Supreme Court? Thank a Republican. Ginsberg? Sotomayor? The only other woman appointed was O'Connor, by Ronny Raygun. Nothing escapes you, I see. Are you attempting a personal attack? -- Nom=de=Plume Pennie, are you that defensive? You may call me Ms. Plume. Are you that concerned? -- Nom=de=Plume |
Got daughters involved in college sports?
"TopBassDog" wrote in message
... On Sep 2, 6:59 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote: wrote in message ... I'll take you at your word, but you also attempted to go after me with some ideological label re the "shrine" comment. That's better left to shrill and timid people. I find it odd that anyone would speak of any politician affectionately, unless those person were immediately related. I also think it odd for any person to idolize another person, regardless of stature and estate, unless the other person is immediate family. Why? What if that person helped you, your family, another relation, or just a friend. Wouldn't you mentioned it after he or she died? Where do you get the "idolize" part? Someone else is talking about a shrine in the basement. I'm talking about acknowledging someone's accomplishments. -- Nom=de=Plume The late senator was a popular statesman, yet had been known for his drunken licentiousness and dubious affairs. But otherwise he signed some good bills occasionally. I agree. He wasn't a drunk or a cheat in recent times. He cleaned up and got his act together. -- Nom=de=Plume |
Got daughters involved in college sports?
On Sep 10, 11:50*am, "nom=de=plume" wrote:
"TopBassDog" wrote in message ... Thank a liberal. Have adaughteron the Supreme Court? Thank a Republican. Ginsberg? Sotomayor? The only other woman appointed was O'Connor, by Ronny Raygun. Nothing escapes you, I see. Are you attempting a personal attack? -- Nom=de=Plume Pennie, are you that defensive? You may call me Ms. Plume. Are you that concerned? -- Nom=de=Plume No Pennie. No concern from me. But perhaps you would prefer to be called "Senator?" |
Got daughters involved in college sports?
On Sep 10, 11:52*am, "nom=de=plume" wrote:
"TopBassDog" wrote in message ... On Sep 2, 6:59 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote: wrote in message .. . I'll take you at your word, but you also attempted to go after me with some ideological label re the "shrine" comment. That's better left to shrill and timid people. I find it odd that anyone would speak of any politician affectionately, unless those person were immediately related. I also think it odd for any person to idolize another person, regardless of stature and estate, unless the other person is immediate family. Why? What if that person helped you, your family, another relation, or just a friend. Wouldn't you mentioned it after he or she died? Where do you get the "idolize" part? Someone else is talking about a shrine in the basement. I'm talking about acknowledging someone's accomplishments. -- Nom=de=Plume The late senator was a popular statesman, yet had *been known for his drunken licentiousness and dubious affairs. But otherwise he signed some good bills occasionally. I agree. He wasn't a drunk or a cheat in recent times. He cleaned up and got his act together. -- Nom=de=Plume Many people do seek penance later in life. Especially when they are concerned for facing the Almighty. |
Got daughters involved in college sports?
"TopBassDog" wrote in message
... No Pennie. No concern from me. But perhaps you would prefer to be called "Senator?" Not much a gentleman are you... something, however, is a big concern for you. -- Nom=de=Plume |
Got daughters involved in college sports?
On Sep 11, 12:37*am, "nom=de=plume" wrote:
"TopBassDog" wrote in message ... No Pennie. No concern from me. But perhaps you would prefer to be called "Senator?" Not much a gentleman are you... something, however, is a big concern for you. -- Nom=de=Plume Why , Pennie! Of course I am being gentlemanly. I have not hurled barbing curses at you, have I? And concerned? Why should I be concerned about comments made on rec.boats? |
Got daughters involved in college sports?
"TopBassDog" wrote in message
... On Sep 11, 12:37 am, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "TopBassDog" wrote in message ... No Pennie. No concern from me. But perhaps you would prefer to be called "Senator?" Not much a gentleman are you... something, however, is a big concern for you. -- Nom=de=Plume Why , Pennie! Of course I am being gentlemanly. I have not hurled barbing curses at you, have I? For one thing, I'm not Pennie... where is that coming from? I'm cheap, but I'm not easy. lol -- Nom=de=Plume |
Got daughters involved in college sports?
On Sep 11, 1:17*pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:
"TopBassDog" wrote in message ... On Sep 11, 12:37 am, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "TopBassDog" wrote in message ... No Pennie. No concern from me. But perhaps you would prefer to be called "Senator?" Not much a gentleman are you... something, however, is a big concern for you. -- Nom=de=Plume Why , Pennie! Of course I am being gentlemanly. I have not hurled barbing curses at you, have I? For one thing, I'm not Pennie... where is that coming from? I'm cheap, but I'm not easy. lol -- Nom=de=Plume Elementary my dear Pennie. "Nom=de=Plume" is French for "Pen Name" So I take it that your first name has been shortened from "Pennie" to "Pen" You say you're cheap but not easy. I take it that means that your price may be high but you can be had? So are you advertising your wares and wish to discuss purchase negotiations? |
Got daughters involved in college sports?
"TopBassDog" wrote in message
... On Sep 11, 1:17 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "TopBassDog" wrote in message ... On Sep 11, 12:37 am, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "TopBassDog" wrote in message ... No Pennie. No concern from me. But perhaps you would prefer to be called "Senator?" Not much a gentleman are you... something, however, is a big concern for you. -- Nom=de=Plume Why , Pennie! Of course I am being gentlemanly. I have not hurled barbing curses at you, have I? For one thing, I'm not Pennie... where is that coming from? I'm cheap, but I'm not easy. lol -- Nom=de=Plume Elementary my dear Pennie. "Nom=de=Plume" is French for "Pen Name" So I take it that your first name has been shortened from "Pennie" to "Pen" Well, you'd be wrong. But, nice try. You say you're cheap but not easy. I take it that means that your price may be high but you can be had? Don't understand the word cheap? Try again. vulgar bs removed -- Nom=de=Plume |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:42 AM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com