More Union payoffs = ObamaCare
 

On Sat, 29 Aug 2009 13:26:05 -0400, BAR wrote:


What is the average length of a recession? How much is the average
stimulus package in the average recession excluding this most recent
$787 billion stimulus package?

What is the average length of a depression?

More Union payoffs = ObamaCare
 

On Aug 29, 2:32*pm, thunder wrote:
On Sat, 29 Aug 2009 13:26:05 -0400, BAR wrote:
What is the average length of a recession? How much is the average
stimulus package in the average recession excluding this most recent
$787 billion stimulus package?

What is the average length of a depression?

Only a liberal could find it good that those of us who do not have
pensions would have to pay our tax dollars to support health care for
the UAW that would be far better than that the rest of us will get.
However, these are people who think "Teddy" was a great man so what do
you expect.

More Union payoffs = ObamaCare
 

Frogwatch wrote:
On Aug 29, 2:32 pm, thunder wrote:
On Sat, 29 Aug 2009 13:26:05 -0400, BAR wrote:
What is the average length of a recession? How much is the average
stimulus package in the average recession excluding this most recent
$787 billion stimulus package?
What is the average length of a depression?

Only a liberal could find it good that those of us who do not have
pensions would have to pay our tax dollars to support health care for
the UAW that would be far better than that the rest of us will get.
However, these are people who think "Teddy" was a great man so what do
you expect.


Isn't it time for you to take a long, unaccompanied boat trip on ocean
waters?

More Union payoffs = ObamaCare
 

Hey Krausie, how's that "much younger" wife working out for you?

More Union payoffs = ObamaCare
 

GC Boater wrote:
Hey Krausie, how's that "much younger" wife working out for you?

The key word is "working" I'll bet she can't wait for him to have a "gun
cleaning accident"

More Union payoffs = ObamaCare
 

JustWait wrote:
In article ,
says...
JustWait wrote:
In article ,
says...
Tom Francis - SWSports wrote:
On Sat, 29 Aug 2009 08:42:32 -0500, thunder
wrote:

On Sat, 29 Aug 2009 08:55:34 -0400, John H. wrote:


Obscene, but Bush wasted $78 billion in Iraq.
To date, the War in Iraq has cost us @ $700 billion.
True enough. But that was over how many years? We just spent that and
more on bailing out Unions, GM, Chrysler, ACORN and just 13% of $780
Billion in one year was spent on things that were actually important.

One year compared to...um...8?

Some of us consider it all wasted.
Some of us believe that the recent "stimulus" package is a complete
waste and, frankly, have been proven in general, right.
You forget "pesky" facts like the stock markets are rebounding quite
well, Ford has had a good quarter, GM is coming back, houses starts in
many markets are up, etc.
Most economists figured it would start to pick up about now anyway,
without porkulous...

Okay, let's go with that. Tell me how you know for a fact that it would
have picked up without the stimulus package.

I never said fact. I clearly said, and I will quote.

"Most economists figured it would start to pick up about now anyway,
without porkulous."

and the fact still stands...

Oh, so you just speculated in order to once again, say something
negative about Obama?

More Union payoffs = ObamaCare
 

In article ,
says...

JustWait wrote:
In article ,
says...
JustWait wrote:
In article ,
says...
Tom Francis - SWSports wrote:
On Sat, 29 Aug 2009 08:42:32 -0500, thunder
wrote:

On Sat, 29 Aug 2009 08:55:34 -0400, John H. wrote:


Obscene, but Bush wasted $78 billion in Iraq.
To date, the War in Iraq has cost us @ $700 billion.
True enough. But that was over how many years? We just spent that and
more on bailing out Unions, GM, Chrysler, ACORN and just 13% of $780
Billion in one year was spent on things that were actually important.

One year compared to...um...8?

Some of us consider it all wasted.
Some of us believe that the recent "stimulus" package is a complete
waste and, frankly, have been proven in general, right.
You forget "pesky" facts like the stock markets are rebounding quite
well, Ford has had a good quarter, GM is coming back, houses starts in
many markets are up, etc.
Most economists figured it would start to pick up about now anyway,
without porkulous...

Okay, let's go with that. Tell me how you know for a fact that it would
have picked up without the stimulus package.

I never said fact. I clearly said, and I will quote.

"Most economists figured it would start to pick up about now anyway,
without porkulous."

and the fact still stands...

Oh, so you just speculated in order to once again, say something
negative about Obama?

No, I have just heard a handful of economists say that... In Dem
thinking, that is a concensus, "settled" as it were. snerk

--
Wafa free since 2009

More Union payoffs = ObamaCare
 

JustWait wrote:
In article ,
says...
JustWait wrote:
In article ,
says...
JustWait wrote:
In article ,
says...
Tom Francis - SWSports wrote:
On Sat, 29 Aug 2009 08:42:32 -0500, thunder
wrote:

On Sat, 29 Aug 2009 08:55:34 -0400, John H. wrote:


Obscene, but Bush wasted $78 billion in Iraq.
To date, the War in Iraq has cost us @ $700 billion.
True enough. But that was over how many years? We just spent that and
more on bailing out Unions, GM, Chrysler, ACORN and just 13% of $780
Billion in one year was spent on things that were actually important.

One year compared to...um...8?

Some of us consider it all wasted.
Some of us believe that the recent "stimulus" package is a complete
waste and, frankly, have been proven in general, right.
You forget "pesky" facts like the stock markets are rebounding quite
well, Ford has had a good quarter, GM is coming back, houses starts in
many markets are up, etc.
Most economists figured it would start to pick up about now anyway,
without porkulous...

Okay, let's go with that. Tell me how you know for a fact that it would
have picked up without the stimulus package.
I never said fact. I clearly said, and I will quote.

"Most economists figured it would start to pick up about now anyway,
without porkulous."

and the fact still stands...

Oh, so you just speculated in order to once again, say something
negative about Obama?

No, I have just heard a handful of economists say that... In Dem
thinking, that is a concensus, "settled" as it were. snerk

Just how DO all "dems" think?

More Union payoffs = ObamaCare
 

In article ,
says...

JustWait wrote:
In article ,
says...
JustWait wrote:
In article ,
says...
JustWait wrote:
In article ,
says...
Tom Francis - SWSports wrote:
On Sat, 29 Aug 2009 08:42:32 -0500, thunder
wrote:

On Sat, 29 Aug 2009 08:55:34 -0400, John H. wrote:


Obscene, but Bush wasted $78 billion in Iraq.
To date, the War in Iraq has cost us @ $700 billion.
True enough. But that was over how many years? We just spent that and
more on bailing out Unions, GM, Chrysler, ACORN and just 13% of $780
Billion in one year was spent on things that were actually important.

One year compared to...um...8?

Some of us consider it all wasted.
Some of us believe that the recent "stimulus" package is a complete
waste and, frankly, have been proven in general, right.
You forget "pesky" facts like the stock markets are rebounding quite
well, Ford has had a good quarter, GM is coming back, houses starts in
many markets are up, etc.
Most economists figured it would start to pick up about now anyway,
without porkulous...

Okay, let's go with that. Tell me how you know for a fact that it would
have picked up without the stimulus package.
I never said fact. I clearly said, and I will quote.

"Most economists figured it would start to pick up about now anyway,
without porkulous."

and the fact still stands...

Oh, so you just speculated in order to once again, say something
negative about Obama?

No, I have just heard a handful of economists say that... In Dem
thinking, that is a concensus, "settled" as it were. snerk

Just how DO all "dems" think?

I don't know how you all think, but you throw like girls! ;)

--
Wafa free since 2009

More Union payoffs = ObamaCare
 

On Aug 30, 6:41*am, "Arrr Matey. It'sJim" wrote:
GC Boater wrote:
Hey Krausie, how's that "much younger" wife working out for you?

The key word is "working" I'll bet she can't wait for him to have a "gun
cleaning accident"

I imagine she tired of his worthless lying ass years ago. The fact
that only her name is on the residence deed tells a lot.