Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"JLH" wrote in message
... Not sure what you mean by the Bush Rationale, Since you'e speaking nicely... The 'Bush Rationale' is the reason many liberals provide for any negative critique of an Obama action. I believe that is from a right-wing talking point. There's no shortage of criticism of Obama from the left. For example, "You didn't say anything when Bush did it." Or, "Bush did it, so it's OK if Obama does it too." Hopefully you get the idea. And, as I've said, I'm willing and able to call Obama on crap that's either a hold-over from the Bush years or newly implemented along the same lines. There are very few people who believe that Obama is perfect, I certainly am not among them. As I've said before, for you guys - yourself, w3fh, Harry, etc. - a 'debate' consists of personal insults and name-calling. I absolutely reject that line of reasoning or implication. I don't engage in such behavior. Feel free to show otherwise. I can't speak for others. And, for the record, Bush may have screwed up a few things during his eight year tenure. But, Bush is gone. Obama is trying damn hard to catch up in his first 3/4 of a year. A few things???? Yeah, a few things like a war of choice and a war of necessity, like ruining the economy, like taking approximately 1/3 of his time in office as vacation, like lying to the American public, like spying on Americans, like engaging in intense cronyism, like promoting and condoning torture, and on and on and on. since Bush's "rationale" was based on a twisted notion of religion mixed with failed economics and fear-stoking actions. If you'd like to debate things that Obama has done or not done that are good or not good for the country, and you're willing to actually cite verifiable facts, there's room for discussion. There are plenty of facts from Bush's 8 years worthy of debate, including some things that might be construed as "good" for America (in my opinion of course). A quick example is the African AIDS program (except for the insertion of "abstinance" requirements). There are a plethora of facts/decisions he and his admin made that were terrible (my opinion and the demonstrable results)... no need to repeat them, as I'm sure we're all familar with them. -- Nom=de=Plume |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Would Sotomayor Exonerate Bill Richardson & His "Moving AmericaForward" "Latino Voter Registration" Scam? | General | |||
FS: 1961 "PT 109 John F. Kennedy in World War II" Book in Ontario | Marketplace |