Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Is this another Republican lie?
http://tinyurl.com/nyfxqa -- John H "If you think healthcare is expensive now, wait until it's free!" --Anonymous |
#2
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Mille GT Owner" wrote in message
... Is this another Republican lie? http://tinyurl.com/nyfxqa -- John H "If you think healthcare is expensive now, wait until it's free!" --Anonymous " In another example of bad lawmaking, in 2007, Congress stuck into a supplemental appropriations bill a major change in the way penalties are computed for people in the business of preparing tax returns. Congress acted without consulting with the IRS. The IRS chief counsel at the time, Donald Korb, said publicly that the service had been "blindsided" by the change. The change created a conflict of interest for tax professionals. It subjected them to a higher penalty standard than their clients, which encouraged them to give tax advice that protected the tax preparer more than the taxpayer. The IRS and tax professionals tore their hair out trying to sort through the mess until 2008, when Congress changed the law again. There are lessons here for Congress. Don't take away the ability of the IRS to waive penalties. Also, don't tinker with penalties without thinking through the effect on the overall penalty regime. " -- Nom=de=Plume |
#3
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Aug 25, 6:42*pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:
"Mille GT Owner" wrote in messagenews:67j895998pjsqhgfs62t55rh9slc4ad6n4@4ax .com... Is this another Republican lie? http://tinyurl.com/nyfxqa -- John H "If you think healthcare is expensive now, wait until it's free!" --Anonymous " In another example of bad lawmaking, in 2007, Congress stuck into a supplemental appropriations bill a major change in the way penalties are computed for people in the business of preparing tax returns. Congress acted without consulting with the IRS. The IRS chief counsel at the time, Donald Korb, said publicly that the service had been "blindsided" by the change. The change created a conflict of interest for tax professionals. It subjected them to a higher penalty standard than their clients, which encouraged them to give tax advice that protected the tax preparer more than the taxpayer. The IRS and tax professionals tore their hair out trying to sort through the mess until 2008, when Congress changed the law again. There are lessons here for Congress. Don't take away the ability of the IRS to waive penalties. Also, don't tinker with penalties without thinking through the effect on the overall penalty regime. " -- Nom=de=Plume If the health care bill passes with this in it, you will soon see massive closing of small businesses because they cannot afford these penalties whereas Wal Mart can. This was intentionally done by radical dems to cripple the US economy. First you kill small business that cannot fight back and then you take on the biggies by either co- opting them or by treaties with them. This is an intentional attack on the US economy to make small business owners and employees have to become govt slaves. |
#4
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Katie Ohara" wrote in message
... On Aug 25, 6:42 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "Mille GT Owner" wrote in messagenews:67j895998pjsqhgfs62t55rh9slc4ad6n4@4ax .com... Is this another Republican lie? http://tinyurl.com/nyfxqa -- John H "If you think healthcare is expensive now, wait until it's free!" --Anonymous " In another example of bad lawmaking, in 2007, Congress stuck into a supplemental appropriations bill a major change in the way penalties are computed for people in the business of preparing tax returns. Congress acted without consulting with the IRS. The IRS chief counsel at the time, Donald Korb, said publicly that the service had been "blindsided" by the change. The change created a conflict of interest for tax professionals. It subjected them to a higher penalty standard than their clients, which encouraged them to give tax advice that protected the tax preparer more than the taxpayer. The IRS and tax professionals tore their hair out trying to sort through the mess until 2008, when Congress changed the law again. There are lessons here for Congress. Don't take away the ability of the IRS to waive penalties. Also, don't tinker with penalties without thinking through the effect on the overall penalty regime. " -- Nom=de=Plume ?If the health care bill passes with this in it, you will soon see ?massive closing of small businesses because they cannot afford these ?penalties whereas Wal Mart can. This was intentionally done by ?radical dems to cripple the US economy. First you kill small business ?that cannot fight back and then you take on the biggies by either co- ?opting them or by treaties with them. This is an intentional attack ?on the US economy to make small business owners and employees have to ?become govt slaves. According to you. Well, that must be fact then. Except, this was in 2007/2008. Fear is an aphrodisiac isn't it? -- Nom=de=Plume |
#5
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Aug 25, 11:17*pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:
According to you. Well, that must be fact then. Except, this was in 2007/2008. Fear is an aphrodisiac isn't it? -- Nom=de=Plume Actually I thought ground up Rhino horn was.... ?;^ ) |
#6
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mille GT Owner wrote:
Is this another Republican lie? http://tinyurl.com/nyfxqa -- John H "If you think healthcare is expensive now, wait until it's free!" --Anonymous Thanks for making my point!!!! I'm the one who said in the first place, that all politicians are crooks and liars. I don't like it when Harry makes everyone on the left seem infallible, and I don't like it when the right does it either. Really, take a step back and look at your posts for the last few days where everything conservative = great, everything liberal = crap. Who does that remind you of in reverse? |