| Page 2 of 2 | 1 | 2 |
|
|
Back in the USSR
On Tue, 25 Aug 2009 17:29:53 -0400, NotNow wrote:
Mille GT Owner wrote: On Tue, 25 Aug 2009 09:51:42 -0400, NotNow wrote: Guzzistimo wrote: On Tue, 25 Aug 2009 03:22:47 -0700 (PDT), wf3h wrote: On Aug 24, 11:35 pm, JR North wrote: Yup The United States Socialist Republic. I swear I can almost see the Swastika armbands beginning to materialize on National Socialist Obama and his left wing cronies. Sieg Heil! maybe I shouldn't have sold those snappy black boots.... JR HOME PAGE:http://www.seanet.com/~jasonrnorth -------------------------------------------------- guess he's unhappy now that bush is no longer in office, and we have re-established the rule of law in this country. after all, under bush, the govt had unlimited power to tax, to imprison, to suspend civil liberties.... and used those powers. obama doesn't do this. i can see why the right is ****ed Yeah, but why are we wasting money and lives in Afghanistan? -- John H You've been told, John. We have to clean up the mess that Bush left when his ADHD kicked in and he left Afghanistan in shambles and went to Iraq. What mess did he leave in Afghanistan? I keep hearing 'Bush' as our reason for being there. Pretty lame reason. -- John H Hell, you don't know about the fact that Bush left Afghanistan in shambles because his apparent ADD addled mind told him to go to Iraq in the middle of it? Do you realize that many, many military strategists have stated over and over what a terrible mistake that was? Loogy, if I knew what 'mess' Bush left in Afghanistan, and If Obama would be specific about what he is 'cleaning up', then I wouldn't have the question. Do you realize that you, et al, have provided umpteen responses, none of which provide any more of an answer than 'clean up the mess'. What 'mess' did Bush leave? -- John H "If you think healthcare is expensive now, wait until it's free!" --Anonymous |
Back in the USSR
"Mille GT Owner" wrote in message
... On Tue, 25 Aug 2009 13:43:14 -0700, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "Mille GT Owner" wrote in message . .. You've been told, John. We have to clean up the mess that Bush left when his ADHD kicked in and he left Afghanistan in shambles and went to Iraq. What mess did he leave in Afghanistan? I keep hearing 'Bush' as our reason for being there. Pretty lame reason. -- John H "If you think healthcare is expensive now, wait until it's free!" --Anonymous If you don't know, no amount of fact presentation at this point will make it clear. You guys simply can't answer the question, so you tap dance. -- John H "If you think healthcare is expensive now, wait until it's free!" --Anonymous It's been answered (here and elsewhere) many times. You can lead a horse to water, but.... -- Nom=de=Plume |
Back in the USSR
"wf3h" wrote in message ... On Aug 25, 1:55 pm, Jack wrote: On Aug 25, 12:22 pm, wf3h wrote: We now have a brand-new intelligence agency that reports directly to the White House called the HIG. Three letters, as in KGB. Coincidence? the CIA and FBI were created by obama? do tell!! Non sequitur, and those weren't created by Bush either, dimwit. hey moron...they have 3 letters. if you right wingers are gonna go off on a tin foil hat binge, allow me to join in You're leading the koolaid drinking, tin foil hat brigade, so carry on... says the guy who single-handedly boosted alcoa's stock prices... The HIG *was* created by Obama. A new intelligence agency that reports to him. your contention is that all 3 letter intelligence groups are evil Never wrote or implied that, try to keep up. gee. i hope the alzheimer's medicine is working, because here's what was said: We now have a brand-new intelligence agency that reports directly to the White House called the HIG. Three letters, as in KGB. Coincidence? i'll give you the benefit of the doubt and just assume you forgot, because the alternative is that you're just stupid. I did report that obama created yet another "intelligence" agency that reports to him, instead of using the existing ones we already have. Bush does something like that, and you moonbats are screaming that he's evil. Obama does it, and you're cozy with it. Have some more koolaid. given the fact that every time obama farts in the oval office, you guys think he's ready to mount a gas attack on the US, yes, it does seem you have a problem keeping your diapers clean. I admitted nothing. I pointed out that the government had those "powers" before Bush, and continue to have them to this day. You have a reading comprehension problem? and yet you somehow think that it's obama's fault. you guys are stranger than fiction Your lack of brainpower is even stranger. What is it about those powers have I blamed on anyone? The government granted itself those powers long before Bush or obama ever thought about inhabiting the White House. You're the one that blamed it on Bush, when in reality those powers have existed long before he took office, and now obviously continue to exist. and yet you guys keep whining about obama...it seems you don't even read what you write. reply: Maybe it is an arm of this HIG. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hezb-e-Islami_Gulbuddin |
Back in the USSR
"wf3h" wrote in message ... On Aug 25, 4:32 pm, Mille GT Owner wrote: On Tue, 25 Aug 2009 07:56:27 -0700 (PDT), wf3h wrote: On Aug 25, 7:32 am, Guzzistimo wrote: On Tue, 25 Aug 2009 03:22:47 -0700 (PDT), wf3h wrote: On Aug 24, 11:35 pm, JR North wrote: Yup The United States Socialist Republic. I swear I can almost see the Swastika armbands beginning to materialize on National Socialist Obama and his left wing cronies. Sieg Heil! maybe I shouldn't have sold those snappy black boots.... JR HOME PAGE:http://www.seanet.com/~jasonrnorth -------------------------------------------------- guess he's unhappy now that bush is no longer in office, and we have re-established the rule of law in this country. after all, under bush, the govt had unlimited power to tax, to imprison, to suspend civil liberties.... and used those powers. obama doesn't do this. i can see why the right is ****ed Yeah, but why are we wasting money and lives in Afghanistan? -- ever hear of 9/11? oh. you haven't. they don't have news in your cave. well, i don't want to shock you but you might read about it. or have someone read about it to you since you're incapable. Yes, I've heard of 9/11. Afghanistan didn't attack us. The Taliban didn't attack us. -- the taliban attacked us. they were in control of afghanistan haven't they reached 9/11 in your 3rd grade class yet? Haven't they reached 9/11 in your classes? Taliban did not attack us. They allowed Al quaida to have traing camps there. They supported the Taliban, but did not attack us. |
Back in the USSR
On Aug 25, 6:56*pm, "Calif Bill" wrote:
"wf3h" wrote in message ... On Aug 25, 4:32 pm, Mille GT Owner wrote: On Tue, 25 Aug 2009 07:56:27 -0700 (PDT), wf3h wrote: On Aug 25, 7:32 am, Guzzistimo wrote: On Tue, 25 Aug 2009 03:22:47 -0700 (PDT), wf3h wrote: On Aug 24, 11:35 pm, JR North wrote: Yup The United States Socialist Republic. I swear I can almost see the Swastika armbands beginning to materialize on National Socialist Obama and his left wing cronies. Sieg Heil! maybe I shouldn't have sold those snappy black boots.... JR HOME PAGE:http://www.seanet.com/~jasonrnorth -------------------------------------------------- guess he's unhappy now that bush is no longer in office, and we have re-established the rule of law in this country. after all, under bush, the govt had unlimited power to tax, to imprison, to suspend civil liberties.... and used those powers. obama doesn't do this. i can see why the right is ****ed Yeah, but why are we wasting money and lives in Afghanistan? -- ever hear of 9/11? oh. you haven't. they don't have news in your cave. well, i don't want to shock you but you might read about it. or have someone read about it to you since you're incapable. Yes, I've heard of 9/11. Afghanistan didn't attack us. The Taliban didn't attack us. -- the taliban attacked us. they were in control of afghanistan haven't they reached 9/11 in your 3rd grade class yet? Haven't they reached 9/11 in your classes? *Taliban did not attack us. *They allowed Al quaida to have traing camps there. *They supported the Taliban, but did not attack us.- which, of course, means they attacked us i realize common sense is not required on your planet, but on earth we do try to use it on occasion. |
Back in the USSR
"nom=de=plume" wrote in message ... "SteveB" wrote in message ... "nom=de=plume" wrote in message ... "SteveB" wrote in message ... "nom=de=plume" wrote in message ... You must be a very angry person. -- Nom=de=Plume Or observant. Should probably start by looking in the mirror... -- Nom=de=Plume Lemee see. I want to understand you. I see my country falling apart, and I need to look in a mirror? Is that what you're saying? steve My bad. If you see your country falling apart, you should be trying to solve the problem. This includes having a rational, sober discussion with those you believe are causing the problem AND looking in the mirror. That's what I'm saying. -- Nom=de=Plume It's just that you say so many disjointed irrational stupid things that I have a hard time hearing what exactly you ARE saying. Know whut uh mean, Vern? Steve |
Back in the USSR
On Tue, 25 Aug 2009 15:06:33 -0700 (PDT), wf3h
wrote: On Aug 25, 4:32*pm, Mille GT Owner wrote: On Tue, 25 Aug 2009 07:56:27 -0700 (PDT), wf3h wrote: On Aug 25, 7:32*am, Guzzistimo wrote: On Tue, 25 Aug 2009 03:22:47 -0700 (PDT), wf3h wrote: On Aug 24, 11:35*pm, JR North wrote: Yup The United States Socialist Republic. I swear I can almost see the Swastika armbands beginning to materialize on National Socialist Obama and his left wing cronies. Sieg Heil! maybe I shouldn't have sold those snappy black boots.... JR HOME PAGE:http://www.seanet.com/~jasonrnorth -------------------------------------------------- guess he's unhappy now that bush is *no longer in office, and we have re-established the rule of law in this country. after all, under bush, the govt had unlimited power to tax, to imprison, to suspend civil liberties.... and used those powers. obama doesn't do this. i can see why the right is ****ed Yeah, but why are we wasting money and lives in Afghanistan? -- ever hear of 9/11? oh. you haven't. they don't have news in your cave. well, i don't want to shock you but you might read about it. or have someone read about it to you since you're incapable. Yes, I've heard of 9/11. Afghanistan didn't attack us. The Taliban didn't attack us. -- the taliban attacked us. they were in control of afghanistan haven't they reached 9/11 in your 3rd grade class yet? And all along I thought it was al-Qaeda who attacked us, with Osama bin Laden as the leader of the group. Remember? These guys: (from Wikipedia) Al-Qaeda, alternatively spelled al-Qaida and sometimes al-Qa'ida, (Arabic: ????????; al-qa-?idah; translation: The Base) is an Islamist group founded sometime between August 1988[5] and late 1989/early 1990.[6] It operates as a network comprising both a multinational, stateless arm[7] and a fundamentalist Sunni movement calling for Jihadi international . Al-Qaeda has attacked civilian and military targets in various countries, the most notable being the September 11 attacks in 2001. These actions were followed by the US government launching the War on Terrorism. As of 2009, the group is believed to have between 200 and 300 members.[8] Have you ever noticed how most liberals feel they must resort to personal insults and name-calling during any discussion? -- John H "If you think healthcare is expensive now, wait until it's free!" --Anonymous |
Back in the USSR
On Tue, 25 Aug 2009 15:36:22 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote: "Mille GT Owner" wrote in message .. . On Tue, 25 Aug 2009 13:43:14 -0700, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "Mille GT Owner" wrote in message ... You've been told, John. We have to clean up the mess that Bush left when his ADHD kicked in and he left Afghanistan in shambles and went to Iraq. What mess did he leave in Afghanistan? I keep hearing 'Bush' as our reason for being there. Pretty lame reason. -- John H "If you think healthcare is expensive now, wait until it's free!" --Anonymous If you don't know, no amount of fact presentation at this point will make it clear. You guys simply can't answer the question, so you tap dance. -- John H "If you think healthcare is expensive now, wait until it's free!" --Anonymous It's been answered (here and elsewhere) many times. You can lead a horse to water, but.... Ah yes, to clean up what Bush left, to disrupt the Taliban's attempt to attack us (which they've never done anyway), and to clean up the mess Bush left behind. Oh, and because Bush got us in there. Maybe Obama wants some of the Talibans opium production? That's as good as any of the 'reasons' you've propounded. The arguments presented by you, wf3h, and Loogy all have the same degree of merit. -- John H "If you think healthcare is expensive now, wait until it's free!" --Anonymous |
Back in the USSR
On Tue, 25 Aug 2009 17:29:26 -0600, "SteveB"
wrote: "nom=de=plume" wrote in message ... "SteveB" wrote in message ... "nom=de=plume" wrote in message ... "SteveB" wrote in message ... "nom=de=plume" wrote in message ... You must be a very angry person. -- Nom=de=Plume Or observant. Should probably start by looking in the mirror... -- Nom=de=Plume Lemee see. I want to understand you. I see my country falling apart, and I need to look in a mirror? Is that what you're saying? steve My bad. If you see your country falling apart, you should be trying to solve the problem. This includes having a rational, sober discussion with those you believe are causing the problem AND looking in the mirror. That's what I'm saying. -- Nom=de=Plume It's just that you say so many disjointed irrational stupid things that I have a hard time hearing what exactly you ARE saying. Know whut uh mean, Vern? Steve You are correct, of course. He, wf3h, and Loogy seem to be sharing notes. -- John H "If you think healthcare is expensive now, wait until it's free!" --Anonymous |
Back in the USSR
On Aug 25, 7:58*pm, Mille GT Owner wrote:
On Tue, 25 Aug 2009 15:06:33 -0700 (PDT), wf3h wrote: -- ever hear of 9/11? oh. you haven't. they don't have news in your cave. well, i don't want to shock you but you might read about it. or have someone read about it to you since you're incapable. Yes, I've heard of 9/11. Afghanistan didn't attack us. The Taliban didn't attack us. -- the taliban attacked us. they were in control of afghanistan haven't they reached 9/11 in your 3rd grade class yet? And all along I thought it was al-Qaeda who attacked us, with Osama bin Laden as the leader of the group. well, glad to disabuse you of your simplistic and all too naive concepts. glad to be of service. Remember? These guys: (from Wikipedia) hmmm...worse than i thought. he gets his worldview from 'wikipedia'...my optimism was premature... Al-Qaeda has attacked civilian and military targets in various countries, the most notable being the September 11 attacks in 2001. These actions were followed by the US government launching the War on Terrorism. As of 2009, the group is believed to have between 200 and 300 members.[8] Have you ever noticed how most liberals feel they must resort to personal insults and name-calling during any discussion? -- have you noticed how clueless reactionaries are about history? astonishing... |
Back in the USSR
On Aug 25, 7:58*pm, Mille GT Owner wrote:
On Tue, 25 Aug 2009 15:06:33 -0700 (PDT), wf3h wrote: On Aug 25, 4:32*pm, Mille GT Owner wrote: On Tue, 25 Aug 2009 07:56:27 -0700 (PDT), wf3h wrote: On Aug 25, 7:32*am, Guzzistimo wrote: On Tue, 25 Aug 2009 03:22:47 -0700 (PDT), wf3h wrote: On Aug 24, 11:35*pm, JR North wrote: Yup The United States Socialist Republic. I swear I can almost see the Swastika armbands beginning to materialize on National Socialist Obama and his left wing cronies. Sieg Heil! maybe I shouldn't have sold those snappy black boots.... JR HOME PAGE:http://www.seanet.com/~jasonrnorth -------------------------------------------------- guess he's unhappy now that bush is *no longer in office, and we have re-established the rule of law in this country. after all, under bush, the govt had unlimited power to tax, to imprison, to suspend civil liberties.... and used those powers. obama doesn't do this. i can see why the right is ****ed Yeah, but why are we wasting money and lives in Afghanistan? -- ever hear of 9/11? oh. you haven't. they don't have news in your cave. well, i don't want to shock you but you might read about it. or have someone read about it to you since you're incapable. Yes, I've heard of 9/11. Afghanistan didn't attack us. The Taliban didn't attack us. -- the taliban attacked us. they were in control of afghanistan haven't they reached 9/11 in your 3rd grade class yet? And all along I thought it was al-Qaeda who attacked us, with Osama bin Laden as the leader of the group. Remember? These guys: (from Wikipedia) Al-Qaeda, alternatively spelled al-Qaida and sometimes al-Qa'ida, (Arabic: ????????; al-qa-?idah; translation: The Base) is an Islamist group founded sometime between August 1988[5] and late 1989/early 1990.[6] It operates as a network comprising both a multinational, stateless arm[7] and a fundamentalist Sunni movement calling for Jihadi international . Al-Qaeda has attacked civilian and military targets in various countries, the most notable being the September 11 attacks in 2001. These actions were followed by the US government launching the War on Terrorism. As of 2009, the group is believed to have between 200 and 300 members.[8] Have you ever noticed how most liberals feel they must resort to personal insults and name-calling during any discussion? -- John H "If you think healthcare is expensive now, wait until it's free!" --Anonymous- John, The title of this thread is "Back in the USSR", and when wf3h failed to grasp the concept of my comparing the HIG to the KGB, I realized I was attempting to engage in debate with an unarmed man. He rides the short bus. Leave him be. |
Back in the USSR
On Aug 25, 5:01*pm, Vic Smith wrote:
On Tue, 25 Aug 2009 13:28:14 -0700 (PDT), Jack wrote: Humorous Vic, but even your own reference states: "allowing the NSC (which is essentially a White House arm) to have oversight of the HIG might give Obama and future Presidents too much control..." Why create more bureaucracy when we already have plenty in place? *And then place it under the control of the White House? Don't have a conclusive answer, but I have heard time and time again that the FBI has the most productive interrogation techniques of any agency, and the CIA can't hold a candle to them. *No expertise. That may be true, but the FBI's results are far more public than the CIA's. Since they are rivals and government agencies, we mere mortals only hear what we are allowed to hear. As far as bureaucracy, I've heard that all the outsourcing done in the last 15 or so years just adds layers, and costs. Couldn't believe the Army can't cook for itself, and Blackwater gets hired for that at much more cost. I'd like to see some cost numbers on what the CIA paid its contracted "interrogators" versus what it would cost the FBI to do it. All that is nice, but has nothing to do with the subject at hand. We're not talking about outsourcing, we're talking about the current admin creating a new agency, directly under its control, with the supposed agenda of gathering high value intel. According to you, the FBI is already capable of this, and with some marching orders they can do it. No outsourcing involved. What are we not being told? Why the new agency, with direct report to the White House? This smells, and you know it. |
Back in the USSR
On Aug 25, 9:19*pm, Jack wrote:
On Aug 25, 7:58*pm, Mille GT Owner wrote: the taliban attacked us. they were in control of afghanistan haven't they reached 9/11 in your 3rd grade class yet? And all along I thought it was al-Qaeda who attacked us, with Osama bin Laden as the leader of the group. Remember? These guys: (from Wikipedia) Have you ever noticed how most liberals feel they must resort to personal insults and name-calling during any discussion? -- John H "If you think healthcare is expensive now, wait until it's free!" --Anonymous- John, The title of this thread is "Back in the USSR", and when wf3h failed to grasp the concept of my comparing the HIG to the KGB, I realized I was attempting to engage in debate with an unarmed man. He rides the short bus. *Leave him be.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - what i grasped was that counting to 3 is your big accomplishment for the year my hearty and sincere congratulations to you and your family. |
Back in the USSR
"SteveB" wrote in message
... Lemee see. I want to understand you. I see my country falling apart, and I need to look in a mirror? Is that what you're saying? My bad. If you see your country falling apart, you should be trying to solve the problem. This includes having a rational, sober discussion with those you believe are causing the problem AND looking in the mirror. That's what I'm saying. It's just that you say so many disjointed irrational stupid things that I have a hard time hearing what exactly you ARE saying. Know whut uh mean, Vern? So, basically, you have nothing to say, except to attack those with whom you disagree. Got it! -- Nom=de=Plume |
Back in the USSR
"Mille GT Owner" wrote in message
... You are correct, of course. He, wf3h, and Loogy seem to be sharing notes. AKA thinking. -- Nom=de=Plume |
Back in the USSR
In article ,
says... On Tue, 25 Aug 2009 17:29:53 -0400, NotNow wrote: Mille GT Owner wrote: On Tue, 25 Aug 2009 09:51:42 -0400, NotNow wrote: Guzzistimo wrote: On Tue, 25 Aug 2009 03:22:47 -0700 (PDT), wf3h wrote: On Aug 24, 11:35 pm, JR North wrote: Yup The United States Socialist Republic. I swear I can almost see the Swastika armbands beginning to materialize on National Socialist Obama and his left wing cronies. Sieg Heil! maybe I shouldn't have sold those snappy black boots.... JR HOME PAGE:http://www.seanet.com/~jasonrnorth -------------------------------------------------- guess he's unhappy now that bush is no longer in office, and we have re-established the rule of law in this country. after all, under bush, the govt had unlimited power to tax, to imprison, to suspend civil liberties.... and used those powers. obama doesn't do this. i can see why the right is ****ed Yeah, but why are we wasting money and lives in Afghanistan? -- John H You've been told, John. We have to clean up the mess that Bush left when his ADHD kicked in and he left Afghanistan in shambles and went to Iraq. What mess did he leave in Afghanistan? I keep hearing 'Bush' as our reason for being there. Pretty lame reason. -- John H Hell, you don't know about the fact that Bush left Afghanistan in shambles because his apparent ADD addled mind told him to go to Iraq in the middle of it? Do you realize that many, many military strategists have stated over and over what a terrible mistake that was? Loogy, if I knew what 'mess' Bush left in Afghanistan, and If Obama would be specific about what he is 'cleaning up', then I wouldn't have the question. Do you realize that you, et al, have provided umpteen responses, none of which provide any more of an answer than 'clean up the mess'. What 'mess' did Bush leave? Well, there's all those schools, with girls in them! There's at least a government elected by the people in the Capital city, they have leaders who can be brought to a table... They have a national economy "that is legal" and many more options than they had before we went in... For ****ing starters. There, I can post without the bumper sticker latest lie... -- Wafa free since 2009 |
Back in the USSR
On Tue, 25 Aug 2009 18:29:48 -0700 (PDT), Jack
wrote: On Aug 25, 5:01Â*pm, Vic Smith wrote: On Tue, 25 Aug 2009 13:28:14 -0700 (PDT), Jack wrote: Humorous Vic, but even your own reference states: "allowing the NSC (which is essentially a White House arm) to have oversight of the HIG might give Obama and future Presidents too much control..." Why create more bureaucracy when we already have plenty in place? Â*And then place it under the control of the White House? Don't have a conclusive answer, but I have heard time and time again that the FBI has the most productive interrogation techniques of any agency, and the CIA can't hold a candle to them. Â*No expertise. That may be true, but the FBI's results are far more public than the CIA's. Since they are rivals and government agencies, we mere mortals only hear what we are allowed to hear. As far as bureaucracy, I've heard that all the outsourcing done in the last 15 or so years just adds layers, and costs. Couldn't believe the Army can't cook for itself, and Blackwater gets hired for that at much more cost. I'd like to see some cost numbers on what the CIA paid its contracted "interrogators" versus what it would cost the FBI to do it. All that is nice, but has nothing to do with the subject at hand. We're not talking about outsourcing, we're talking about the current admin creating a new agency, directly under its control, with the supposed agenda of gathering high value intel. According to you, the FBI is already capable of this, and with some marching orders they can do it. No outsourcing involved. What are we not being told? Why the new agency, with direct report to the White House? This smells, and you know it. *I'm* talking about outsourcing interrogation to amateurs, which is what the Bush admin did. HIG is defined as an "interagency team of interrogators" in the article I posted. For all we know HIG interrogation teams will be staffed by FBI pros, already on the payroll, so there's no need to bring in highly paid civilian jomocas whose expertise is crowing "I can make the SOB talk. Give me some water and a board and he'll tell us exactly what we want to hear." How come all of a sudden you want to know all the anti-terrorism secrets? And it doesn't smell to me, or worry me at all. That's what opposing parties are for. I wish the Reps all the luck the Dems had in protecting the interests of American citizens. Whine away. BTW, I'm opposed to selling the store to the executive, whatever the party. So I want to hear the Reps whine at least as loud as the Dems did. It'll be fun hearing the Dems call them traitors and terrorist sympathizers too. And so it goes. That's why America is great! --Vic |
Back in the USSR
"nom=de=plume" wrote in message ... "SteveB" wrote in message ... Lemee see. I want to understand you. I see my country falling apart, and I need to look in a mirror? Is that what you're saying? My bad. If you see your country falling apart, you should be trying to solve the problem. This includes having a rational, sober discussion with those you believe are causing the problem AND looking in the mirror. That's what I'm saying. It's just that you say so many disjointed irrational stupid things that I have a hard time hearing what exactly you ARE saying. Know whut uh mean, Vern? So, basically, you have nothing to say, except to attack those with whom you disagree. Got it! -- Nom=de=Plume A statement of fact is not an ad hominem attack. Go to the ladies section at the drug store and get some skin thickener. Steve |
Back in the USSR
On Aug 26, 11:53*am, U-joint Buster wrote:
I finished with him last night. He's just not realized it yet. -- John H the primary characteristic of the redneck right is that you tell each other how great you are. strange that no one else notices. |
Back in the USSR
On Aug 26, 11:57*am, U-joint Buster wrote:
More 'Bush Rationale' bull****. Loogy, I put your arguments right up there alongside nomdeplum and wf3h. wow. i'm honored....speechless... i'd like to thank the academy....my parents...my wonderful school teachers... |
Back in the USSR
On Aug 26, 10:13*pm, JustWait wrote:
Uh, you don't know for **** why he went from Afghanistan to Iraq, but you do know the bumper sticker reason and like WF3H and Harry, blindly interject it into every post... says the guy who thinks neville chamberlain was more of a hero than christ, ghandi and MLK put together. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:41 AM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com