Children toting firepower...
 

H the K wrote:
BAR wrote:
J i m wrote:
BAR wrote:
H the K wrote:
Keith Nuttle wrote:
In most states those who have guns
have passed back ground checks, so have been "validated".


In some states, there are ways around the "validation" because of
the gun show loophole, which must be closed.

Why? The 1st amendment isn't limited to those who pass a background
check?

The validation process isn't stringent enough if card carrying
loonies like Krause can get themselves validated. But sadly, closing
the gun show loophole won't prevent professional murderers and other
armed crime doers from obtaining the tools of their trade.

If we stopped law abiding citizens from owning guns then it will just
be the criminals and government with guns.


It was the gun show loophole being discussed, moron.

Show me where in the 2nd amendment it states that you are required to
have a background check? In fact which of the first 10 amendments, the
bill of rights, requires that a person have a background check?

I am waiting for you to put forth the well regulated militia argument.
Because if you do you will have to turn in all of your firearms.

Children toting firepower...
 

BAR wrote:
H the K wrote:
BAR wrote:
J i m wrote:
BAR wrote:
H the K wrote:
Keith Nuttle wrote:
In most states those who have guns
have passed back ground checks, so have been "validated".


In some states, there are ways around the "validation" because of
the gun show loophole, which must be closed.

Why? The 1st amendment isn't limited to those who pass a background
check?

The validation process isn't stringent enough if card carrying
loonies like Krause can get themselves validated. But sadly, closing
the gun show loophole won't prevent professional murderers and other
armed crime doers from obtaining the tools of their trade.

If we stopped law abiding citizens from owning guns then it will just
be the criminals and government with guns.


It was the gun show loophole being discussed, moron.

Show me where in the 2nd amendment it states that you are required to
have a background check? In fact which of the first 10 amendments, the
bill of rights, requires that a person have a background check?

I am waiting for you to put forth the well regulated militia argument.
Because if you do you will have to turn in all of your firearms.


We have by law background checks. If you think the federal and state
laws on that matter are non-Constitutional, well, go fight them. I
accept them as necessary.

Whenever I buy a firearm, I go through the instant federal check for a
long gun, and the additional state check if it is a pistol. The "gun
show loophole" only facilitates gun trafficking by criminals.

Children toting firepower...
 

"wf3h" wrote in message
...
On Aug 18, 9:33 pm, Keith Nuttle wrote:
jps wrote:
Couldn't agree with this writer more...

At The Atlanta Journal Constitution in Gingrey’s home state, writer
Jay Bookman takes issue with the increasing trend of Americans coming
to public meeting with deadly force in-tow.

“It is attempted intimidation,” he wrote. “It is an acknowledgment
that, lacking the intellectual firepower and ammunition to carry the
day, the person in question is prepared to try to settle the issue
using the kind of firepower and ammunition that any idiot can purchase
at a local gunshop.”

Bookman continues: “It also reflects a growing mindset among some that
the government just isn’t listening and thus must be made to listen,
one way or the other. There’s a fundamental childishness to that
attitude, a notion that equates listening to agreement. The person in
question is not prepared to accept the idea that having listened to
him, a majority of his fellow Americans might decide that he is wrong.
So he reserves the right to try to impose his view at the point of a
gun.”

I suspect that the president is much safer with people who are legally
carrying guns than with anyone else. In most states those who have guns
have passed back ground checks, so have been "validated".- Hide quoted
text -


the biggest gun mass killer, the guy at VA tech...owned his guns
legally

33 dead people as a result.

thanks to the NRA

reply: yeah, the NRA sent the *******. It's a conspiracy, I tell ya. And
the NRA also secretly holds stock in EVERY knife company in the world, and
is complicit in every homicide using a knife. Same thing with baseball
bats.

Uh oh. I gotta run to the basement. The invisible black helicopters are
here again .............

bye .....................

Steve

Children toting firepower...
 

"wf3h" wrote in message
...
On Aug 19, 10:04 am, H the K wrote:
wf3h wrote:
On Aug 19, 9:04 am, Tim wrote:
On Aug 19, 6:27 am, wf3h wrote:

On Aug 18, 9:33 pm, Keith Nuttle wrote:
jps wrote:
Couldn't agree with this writer more...
At The Atlanta Journal Constitution in Gingrey’s home state, writer
Jay Bookman takes issue with the increasing trend of Americans
coming
to public meeting with deadly force in-tow.
“It is attempted intimidation,” he wrote. “It is an acknowledgment
that, lacking the intellectual firepower and ammunition to carry the
day, the person in question is prepared to try to settle the issue
using the kind of firepower and ammunition that any idiot can
purchase
at a local gunshop.”
Bookman continues: “It also reflects a growing mindset among some
that
the government just isn’t listening and thus must be made to listen,
one way or the other. There’s a fundamental childishness to that
attitude, a notion that equates listening to agreement. The person
in
question is not prepared to accept the idea that having listened to
him, a majority of his fellow Americans might decide that he is
wrong.
So he reserves the right to try to impose his view at the point of a
gun.”
I suspect that the president is much safer with people who are
legally
carrying guns than with anyone else. In most states those who have
guns
have passed back ground checks, so have been "validated".- Hide
quoted text -
the biggest gun mass killer, the guy at VA tech...owned his guns
legally
33 dead people as a result.
thanks to the NRA
You mean, we told him to pull the trigger????
thanks tot he NRA?-

the NRA has always been in favor of psychopaths owning guns.

And hiring psychopaths as the leaders

the crazier the better. it's impossible to be too right wing in
america.

reply: ****ing a right on dead center. They want right wing loony
psychopaths so that it will intimidate the left who would have all handguns
melted and turned into statues of Barack Obama.

Steve

Children toting firepower...
 

"BAR" wrote in message
...
J i m wrote:
BAR wrote:
H the K wrote:
Keith Nuttle wrote:
In most states those who have guns
have passed back ground checks, so have been "validated".


In some states, there are ways around the "validation" because of the
gun show loophole, which must be closed.

Why? The 1st amendment isn't limited to those who pass a background
check?

The validation process isn't stringent enough if card carrying loonies
like Krause can get themselves validated. But sadly, closing the gun show
loophole won't prevent professional murderers and other armed crime doers
from obtaining the tools of their trade.

If we stopped law abiding citizens from owning guns then it will just be
the criminals and government with guns.

We'd have a fighting chance against the criminals, but not the government.
ACORN people retrained to be snitch police, and with guns. Now that's
lunacy.

Steve

Children toting firepower...
 

Scope? Scopes are for pussies. You should be able to put 10 in the black
at 500 yards in the prone position using iron sites.

Freaking scopes, are you pretending to be a sniper shooting a paper
targets at 100 yards?


Scopes and lasers are for people who can't shoot.

Steve

Children toting firepower...
 

On Aug 19, 10:49*am, "SteveB" wrote:
"wf3h" wrote in message

...
On Aug 19, 10:04 am, H the K wrote:





wf3h wrote:
On Aug 19, 9:04 am, Tim wrote:
On Aug 19, 6:27 am, wf3h wrote:

On Aug 18, 9:33 pm, Keith Nuttle wrote:
jps wrote:
Couldn't agree with this writer more...
At The Atlanta Journal Constitution in Gingrey’s home state, writer
Jay Bookman takes issue with the increasing trend of Americans
coming
to public meeting with deadly force in-tow.
“It is attempted intimidation,” he wrote. “It is an acknowledgment
that, lacking the intellectual firepower and ammunition to carry the
day, the person in question is prepared to try to settle the issue
using the kind of firepower and ammunition that any idiot can
purchase
at a local gunshop.”
Bookman continues: “It also reflects a growing mindset among some
that
the government just isn’t listening and thus must be made to listen,
one way or the other. There’s a fundamental childishness to that
attitude, a notion that equates listening to agreement. The person
in
question is not prepared to accept the idea that having listened to
him, a majority of his fellow Americans might decide that he is
wrong.
So he reserves the right to try to impose his view at the point of a
gun.”
I suspect that the president is much safer with people who are
legally
carrying guns than with anyone else. In most states those who have
guns
have passed back ground checks, so have been "validated".- Hide
quoted text -
the biggest gun mass killer, the guy at VA tech...owned his guns
legally
33 dead people as a result.
thanks to the NRA
You mean, we told him to pull the trigger????
thanks tot he NRA?-

the NRA has always been in favor of psychopaths owning guns.

And hiring psychopaths as the leaders

the crazier the better. it's impossible to be too right wing in
america.

reply: *****ing a right on dead center. *They want right wing loony
psychopaths so that it will intimidate the left who would have all handguns
melted and turned into statues of Barack Obama.


dontcha love the tin foil hat mentality? bush arrested american
citizens and tortured them, spied on them and tried to suspend habeas
corpus...

but obama's the enemy because...well just because he's not a
brownshirt...

Children toting firepower...
 

On Aug 19, 10:48*am, "SteveB" wrote:
"wf3h" wrote in message

...
On Aug 18, 9:33 pm, Keith Nuttle wrote:





jps wrote:
Couldn't agree with this writer more...

At The Atlanta Journal Constitution in Gingrey’s home state, writer
Jay Bookman takes issue with the increasing trend of Americans coming
to public meeting with deadly force in-tow.

“It is attempted intimidation,” he wrote. “It is an acknowledgment
that, lacking the intellectual firepower and ammunition to carry the
day, the person in question is prepared to try to settle the issue
using the kind of firepower and ammunition that any idiot can purchase
at a local gunshop.”

Bookman continues: “It also reflects a growing mindset among some that
the government just isn’t listening and thus must be made to listen,
one way or the other. There’s a fundamental childishness to that
attitude, a notion that equates listening to agreement. The person in
question is not prepared to accept the idea that having listened to
him, a majority of his fellow Americans might decide that he is wrong..
So he reserves the right to try to impose his view at the point of a
gun.”

I suspect that the president is much safer with people who are legally
carrying guns than with anyone else. In most states those who have guns
have passed back ground checks, so have been "validated".- Hide quoted
text -

the biggest gun mass killer, the guy at VA tech...owned his guns
legally

33 dead people as a result.

thanks to the NRA

reply: *yeah, the NRA sent the *******.

they enabled the *******. they're a bunch of amoral, pot bellied beer
swilling misanthropes who think the constitution should be limited to
the 2nd amendment

*

Children toting firepower...
 

BAR wrote:
J i m wrote:
BAR wrote:
H the K wrote:
Keith Nuttle wrote:
In most states those who have guns
have passed back ground checks, so have been "validated".


In some states, there are ways around the "validation" because of
the gun show loophole, which must be closed.

Why? The 1st amendment isn't limited to those who pass a background
check?

The validation process isn't stringent enough if card carrying loonies
like Krause can get themselves validated. But sadly, closing the gun
show loophole won't prevent professional murderers and other armed
crime doers from obtaining the tools of their trade.

If we stopped law abiding citizens from owning guns then it will just be
the criminals and government with guns.

Ya but I don't want every Tom Dick and "Harry" running around waving
guns. I didn't say we should prevent sane, responsible people from
owning guns.

Children toting firepower...
 

On Wed, 19 Aug 2009 08:01:59 -0700 (PDT), wf3h
wrote:

On Aug 19, 10:49*am, "SteveB" wrote:
"wf3h" wrote in message

...
On Aug 19, 10:04 am, H the K wrote:





wf3h wrote:
On Aug 19, 9:04 am, Tim wrote:
On Aug 19, 6:27 am, wf3h wrote:

On Aug 18, 9:33 pm, Keith Nuttle wrote:
jps wrote:
Couldn't agree with this writer more...
At The Atlanta Journal Constitution in Gingrey’s home state, writer
Jay Bookman takes issue with the increasing trend of Americans
coming
to public meeting with deadly force in-tow.
“It is attempted intimidation,” he wrote. “It is an acknowledgment
that, lacking the intellectual firepower and ammunition to carry the
day, the person in question is prepared to try to settle the issue
using the kind of firepower and ammunition that any idiot can
purchase
at a local gunshop.”
Bookman continues: “It also reflects a growing mindset among some
that
the government just isn’t listening and thus must be made to listen,
one way or the other. There’s a fundamental childishness to that
attitude, a notion that equates listening to agreement. The person
in
question is not prepared to accept the idea that having listened to
him, a majority of his fellow Americans might decide that he is
wrong.
So he reserves the right to try to impose his view at the point of a
gun.”
I suspect that the president is much safer with people who are
legally
carrying guns than with anyone else. In most states those who have
guns
have passed back ground checks, so have been "validated".- Hide
quoted text -
the biggest gun mass killer, the guy at VA tech...owned his guns
legally
33 dead people as a result.
thanks to the NRA
You mean, we told him to pull the trigger????
thanks tot he NRA?-

the NRA has always been in favor of psychopaths owning guns.

And hiring psychopaths as the leaders

the crazier the better. it's impossible to be too right wing in
america.

reply: *****ing a right on dead center. *They want right wing loony
psychopaths so that it will intimidate the left who would have all handguns
melted and turned into statues of Barack Obama.


dontcha love the tin foil hat mentality? bush arrested american
citizens and tortured them, spied on them and tried to suspend habeas
corpus...

but obama's the enemy because...well just because he's not a
brownshirt...

Well said!