|
When the White House recieves...
a 'fishy email' report, what does it do with the email. For example,
if Loogy forwards an email from me to the White House, what happens to my email, name, etc.? -- John H "Socialism in general has a record of failure so blatant that only an intellectual could ignore or evade it." -- Thomas Sowell |
When the White House recieves...
"Guzzisti" wrote in message
... a 'fishy email' report, what does it do with the email. For example, if Loogy forwards an email from me to the White House, what happens to my email, name, etc.? -- John H "Socialism in general has a record of failure so blatant that only an intellectual could ignore or evade it." -- Thomas Sowell I can answer that... it will be forwarded to various agencies, certainly stored, then sorted and scrubbed for anything even slightly resembling controversial or anti-government views. Both email addresses will be cross-refenced with all retrievable data from credit card purchases, bank accounts, and Internet activity, and both of you will be placed on lists that will ensure all your future activities will be tracked! Oh wait, that's what the previous administration did domestically, apparently. |
When the White House recieves...
|
When the White House recieves...
"nom=de=plume" wrote in message ... "Guzzisti" wrote in message ... a 'fishy email' report, what does it do with the email. For example, if Loogy forwards an email from me to the White House, what happens to my email, name, etc.? -- John H "Socialism in general has a record of failure so blatant that only an intellectual could ignore or evade it." -- Thomas Sowell I can answer that... it will be forwarded to various agencies, certainly stored, then sorted and scrubbed for anything even slightly resembling controversial or anti-government views. Both email addresses will be cross-refenced with all retrievable data from credit card purchases, bank accounts, and Internet activity, and both of you will be placed on lists that will ensure all your future activities will be tracked! Oh wait, that's what the previous administration did domestically, apparently. My, my. Johnny better watch his remarks about certain minorities. You never know who would forward those posts. ;-) |
When the White House recieves...
Don White wrote:
"nom=de=plume" wrote in message ... "Guzzisti" wrote in message ... a 'fishy email' report, what does it do with the email. For example, if Loogy forwards an email from me to the White House, what happens to my email, name, etc.? -- John H "Socialism in general has a record of failure so blatant that only an intellectual could ignore or evade it." -- Thomas Sowell I can answer that... it will be forwarded to various agencies, certainly stored, then sorted and scrubbed for anything even slightly resembling controversial or anti-government views. Both email addresses will be cross-refenced with all retrievable data from credit card purchases, bank accounts, and Internet activity, and both of you will be placed on lists that will ensure all your future activities will be tracked! Oh wait, that's what the previous administration did domestically, apparently. My, my. Johnny better watch his remarks about certain minorities. You never know who would forward those posts. ;-) If I were Johnny Herring the Racist, I'd be more concerned about MS-13 seeing the emails than the White House. His part of the Springfield/Alexandria area is a hotbed of Latino gang activity. |
When the White House recieves...
Guzzisti wrote:
a 'fishy email' report, what does it do with the email. For example, if Loogy forwards an email from me to the White House, what happens to my email, name, etc.? -- John H Obama has a death panel for that too! |
When the White House recieves...
JustWait wrote:
In article , says... a 'fishy email' report, what does it do with the email. For example, if Loogy forwards an email from me to the White House, what happens to my email, name, etc.? The issue is not that. The concern is that someone sends the Whitehouse an email you wrote or forwarded and the headers show your email address. The Whitehouse can't erase that material for about a dozen years or so. The insinuation is that the Whitehouse possibly harvested a list from those emails and emailed "detractors" with a sales pitch.. I am not saying it happened, but that is the insinuation.. I'm betting that you think the Bush admin. did nothing like that, huh? |
When the White House recieves...
In article ,
says... JustWait wrote: In article , says... a 'fishy email' report, what does it do with the email. For example, if Loogy forwards an email from me to the White House, what happens to my email, name, etc.? The issue is not that. The concern is that someone sends the Whitehouse an email you wrote or forwarded and the headers show your email address. The Whitehouse can't erase that material for about a dozen years or so. The insinuation is that the Whitehouse possibly harvested a list from those emails and emailed "detractors" with a sales pitch.. I am not saying it happened, but that is the insinuation.. I'm betting that you think the Bush admin. did nothing like that, huh? Has nothing at all to do with what is happening now. Fact is, if he was a repub, the MSM would be all over it... -- Wafa free since 2009 |
When the White House recieves...
Proprietario di Guzzi wrote:
On Tue, 18 Aug 2009 09:04:01 -0400, NotNow wrote: JustWait wrote: In article , says... a 'fishy email' report, what does it do with the email. For example, if Loogy forwards an email from me to the White House, what happens to my email, name, etc.? The issue is not that. The concern is that someone sends the Whitehouse an email you wrote or forwarded and the headers show your email address. The Whitehouse can't erase that material for about a dozen years or so. The insinuation is that the Whitehouse possibly harvested a list from those emails and emailed "detractors" with a sales pitch.. I am not saying it happened, but that is the insinuation.. I'm betting that you think the Bush admin. did nothing like that, huh? I don't recall the Bush administration asking me to forward 'fishy' emails so the administration could take action. Do you have a reference? That's odd, I don't remember anyone from the Obama admin. contacting me to forward "fishy" emails. Did they contact you, or anyone you know? OR could it be another conservative lie? |
When the White House recieves...
On Tue, 18 Aug 2009 10:25:51 -0400, NotNow wrote:
Proprietario di Guzzi wrote: On Tue, 18 Aug 2009 09:04:01 -0400, NotNow wrote: JustWait wrote: In article , says... a 'fishy email' report, what does it do with the email. For example, if Loogy forwards an email from me to the White House, what happens to my email, name, etc.? The issue is not that. The concern is that someone sends the Whitehouse an email you wrote or forwarded and the headers show your email address. The Whitehouse can't erase that material for about a dozen years or so. The insinuation is that the Whitehouse possibly harvested a list from those emails and emailed "detractors" with a sales pitch.. I am not saying it happened, but that is the insinuation.. I'm betting that you think the Bush admin. did nothing like that, huh? I don't recall the Bush administration asking me to forward 'fishy' emails so the administration could take action. Do you have a reference? That's odd, I don't remember anyone from the Obama admin. contacting me to forward "fishy" emails. Did they contact you, or anyone you know? OR could it be another conservative lie? You mean a true liberal, like yourself, isn't wired to the White House? http://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/Facts...ubborn-Things/ Shame on you. From the source, "Since we can’t keep track of all of them here at the White House, we’re asking for your help. If you get an email or see something on the web about health insurance reform that seems fishy, send it to ." Sounds like phishing to me. Haven't you been forwarding all the posts from folks not agreeing with Obama? -- John H "Socialism in general has a record of failure so blatant that only an intellectual could ignore or evade it." -- Thomas Sowell |
When the White House recieves...
Proprietario di Guzzi wrote:
On Tue, 18 Aug 2009 10:25:51 -0400, NotNow wrote: Proprietario di Guzzi wrote: On Tue, 18 Aug 2009 09:04:01 -0400, NotNow wrote: JustWait wrote: In article , says... a 'fishy email' report, what does it do with the email. For example, if Loogy forwards an email from me to the White House, what happens to my email, name, etc.? The issue is not that. The concern is that someone sends the Whitehouse an email you wrote or forwarded and the headers show your email address. The Whitehouse can't erase that material for about a dozen years or so. The insinuation is that the Whitehouse possibly harvested a list from those emails and emailed "detractors" with a sales pitch.. I am not saying it happened, but that is the insinuation.. I'm betting that you think the Bush admin. did nothing like that, huh? I don't recall the Bush administration asking me to forward 'fishy' emails so the administration could take action. Do you have a reference? That's odd, I don't remember anyone from the Obama admin. contacting me to forward "fishy" emails. Did they contact you, or anyone you know? OR could it be another conservative lie? You mean a true liberal, like yourself, isn't wired to the White House? http://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/Facts...ubborn-Things/ Shame on you. From the source, "Since we can’t keep track of all of them here at the White House, we’re asking for your help. If you get an email or see something on the web about health insurance reform that seems fishy, send it to ." Sounds like phishing to me. Haven't you been forwarding all the posts from folks not agreeing with Obama? -- John H "Socialism in general has a record of failure so blatant that only an intellectual could ignore or evade it." -- Thomas Sowell So you have something against them wanting to know where the lies from the right are being propagated? |
When the White House recieves...
On Tue, 18 Aug 2009 13:01:16 -0400, NotNow wrote:
Proprietario di Guzzi wrote: On Tue, 18 Aug 2009 10:25:51 -0400, NotNow wrote: Proprietario di Guzzi wrote: On Tue, 18 Aug 2009 09:04:01 -0400, NotNow wrote: JustWait wrote: In article , says... a 'fishy email' report, what does it do with the email. For example, if Loogy forwards an email from me to the White House, what happens to my email, name, etc.? The issue is not that. The concern is that someone sends the Whitehouse an email you wrote or forwarded and the headers show your email address. The Whitehouse can't erase that material for about a dozen years or so. The insinuation is that the Whitehouse possibly harvested a list from those emails and emailed "detractors" with a sales pitch.. I am not saying it happened, but that is the insinuation.. I'm betting that you think the Bush admin. did nothing like that, huh? I don't recall the Bush administration asking me to forward 'fishy' emails so the administration could take action. Do you have a reference? That's odd, I don't remember anyone from the Obama admin. contacting me to forward "fishy" emails. Did they contact you, or anyone you know? OR could it be another conservative lie? You mean a true liberal, like yourself, isn't wired to the White House? http://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/Facts...ubborn-Things/ Shame on you. From the source, "Since we can’t keep track of all of them here at the White House, we’re asking for your help. If you get an email or see something on the web about health insurance reform that seems fishy, send it to ." Sounds like phishing to me. Haven't you been forwarding all the posts from folks not agreeing with Obama? -- John H "Socialism in general has a record of failure so blatant that only an intellectual could ignore or evade it." -- Thomas Sowell So you have something against them wanting to know where the lies from the right are being propagated? Even liberals are questioning it: "The ACLU said in a statement to FOXNews.com that the White House blog is a "bad idea that could send a troublesome message." I would have something against them maintaining the email addresses of those who disagreed with their policies. Yes. -- John H "BEND OVER - The 'change' is coming!" |
When the White House recieves...
In article ,
says... Proprietario di Guzzi wrote: On Tue, 18 Aug 2009 10:25:51 -0400, NotNow wrote: Proprietario di Guzzi wrote: On Tue, 18 Aug 2009 09:04:01 -0400, NotNow wrote: JustWait wrote: In article , says... a 'fishy email' report, what does it do with the email. For example, if Loogy forwards an email from me to the White House, what happens to my email, name, etc.? The issue is not that. The concern is that someone sends the Whitehouse an email you wrote or forwarded and the headers show your email address. The Whitehouse can't erase that material for about a dozen years or so. The insinuation is that the Whitehouse possibly harvested a list from those emails and emailed "detractors" with a sales pitch.. I am not saying it happened, but that is the insinuation.. I'm betting that you think the Bush admin. did nothing like that, huh? I don't recall the Bush administration asking me to forward 'fishy' emails so the administration could take action. Do you have a reference? That's odd, I don't remember anyone from the Obama admin. contacting me to forward "fishy" emails. Did they contact you, or anyone you know? OR could it be another conservative lie? You mean a true liberal, like yourself, isn't wired to the White House? http://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/Facts...ubborn-Things/ Shame on you. From the source, "Since we can?t keep track of all of them here at the White House, we?re asking for your help. If you get an email or see something on the web about health insurance reform that seems fishy, send it to ." Sounds like phishing to me. Haven't you been forwarding all the posts from folks not agreeing with Obama? -- John H "Socialism in general has a record of failure so blatant that only an intellectual could ignore or evade it." -- Thomas Sowell So you have something against them wanting to know where the lies from the right are being propagated? No, but the constitution doesn't look kindly on these lists... Or direct personal attacks on private citizens from the Oval Office either, but that's another story.. Oh, wait, no it isn't...;) -- Wafa free since 2009 |
When the White House recieves...
NotNow wrote:
Proprietario di Guzzi wrote: On Tue, 18 Aug 2009 10:25:51 -0400, NotNow wrote: Proprietario di Guzzi wrote: On Tue, 18 Aug 2009 09:04:01 -0400, NotNow wrote: JustWait wrote: In article , says... a 'fishy email' report, what does it do with the email. For example, if Loogy forwards an email from me to the White House, what happens to my email, name, etc.? The issue is not that. The concern is that someone sends the Whitehouse an email you wrote or forwarded and the headers show your email address. The Whitehouse can't erase that material for about a dozen years or so. The insinuation is that the Whitehouse possibly harvested a list from those emails and emailed "detractors" with a sales pitch.. I am not saying it happened, but that is the insinuation.. I'm betting that you think the Bush admin. did nothing like that, huh? I don't recall the Bush administration asking me to forward 'fishy' emails so the administration could take action. Do you have a reference? That's odd, I don't remember anyone from the Obama admin. contacting me to forward "fishy" emails. Did they contact you, or anyone you know? OR could it be another conservative lie? You mean a true liberal, like yourself, isn't wired to the White House? http://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/Facts...ubborn-Things/ Shame on you. From the source, "Since we can’t keep track of all of them here at the White House, we’re asking for your help. If you get an email or see something on the web about health insurance reform that seems fishy, send it to ." Sounds like phishing to me. Haven't you been forwarding all the posts from folks not agreeing with Obama? -- John H "Socialism in general has a record of failure so blatant that only an intellectual could ignore or evade it." -- Thomas Sowell So you have something against them wanting to know where the lies from the right are being propagated? I reported a couple of characters who are acting strangely and are putting out fishy information. The main person was a B. Obama, but I also added that pelosi biden and some others was putting out fishy information. obama now says a third party sent the emails. Why did he give the information on the American Voters to a third party? |
When the White House recieves...
Proprietario di Guzzi wrote:
On Tue, 18 Aug 2009 13:01:16 -0400, NotNow wrote: Proprietario di Guzzi wrote: On Tue, 18 Aug 2009 10:25:51 -0400, NotNow wrote: Proprietario di Guzzi wrote: On Tue, 18 Aug 2009 09:04:01 -0400, NotNow wrote: JustWait wrote: In article , says... a 'fishy email' report, what does it do with the email. For example, if Loogy forwards an email from me to the White House, what happens to my email, name, etc.? The issue is not that. The concern is that someone sends the Whitehouse an email you wrote or forwarded and the headers show your email address. The Whitehouse can't erase that material for about a dozen years or so. The insinuation is that the Whitehouse possibly harvested a list from those emails and emailed "detractors" with a sales pitch.. I am not saying it happened, but that is the insinuation.. I'm betting that you think the Bush admin. did nothing like that, huh? I don't recall the Bush administration asking me to forward 'fishy' emails so the administration could take action. Do you have a reference? That's odd, I don't remember anyone from the Obama admin. contacting me to forward "fishy" emails. Did they contact you, or anyone you know? OR could it be another conservative lie? You mean a true liberal, like yourself, isn't wired to the White House? http://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/Facts...ubborn-Things/ Shame on you. From the source, "Since we can’t keep track of all of them here at the White House, we’re asking for your help. If you get an email or see something on the web about health insurance reform that seems fishy, send it to ." Sounds like phishing to me. Haven't you been forwarding all the posts from folks not agreeing with Obama? -- John H "Socialism in general has a record of failure so blatant that only an intellectual could ignore or evade it." -- Thomas Sowell So you have something against them wanting to know where the lies from the right are being propagated? Even liberals are questioning it: "The ACLU said in a statement to FOXNews.com that the White House blog is a "bad idea that could send a troublesome message." I would have something against them maintaining the email addresses of those who disagreed with their policies. Yes. -- John H "BEND OVER - The 'change' is coming!" Sorry, we lost a lot of our civil liberties with Bush. Didn't seem like a problem for you at the time. |
When the White House recieves...
On Tue, 18 Aug 2009 14:42:53 -0400, NotNow wrote:
Proprietario di Guzzi wrote: On Tue, 18 Aug 2009 13:01:16 -0400, NotNow wrote: Proprietario di Guzzi wrote: On Tue, 18 Aug 2009 10:25:51 -0400, NotNow wrote: Proprietario di Guzzi wrote: On Tue, 18 Aug 2009 09:04:01 -0400, NotNow wrote: JustWait wrote: In article , says... a 'fishy email' report, what does it do with the email. For example, if Loogy forwards an email from me to the White House, what happens to my email, name, etc.? The issue is not that. The concern is that someone sends the Whitehouse an email you wrote or forwarded and the headers show your email address. The Whitehouse can't erase that material for about a dozen years or so. The insinuation is that the Whitehouse possibly harvested a list from those emails and emailed "detractors" with a sales pitch.. I am not saying it happened, but that is the insinuation.. I'm betting that you think the Bush admin. did nothing like that, huh? I don't recall the Bush administration asking me to forward 'fishy' emails so the administration could take action. Do you have a reference? That's odd, I don't remember anyone from the Obama admin. contacting me to forward "fishy" emails. Did they contact you, or anyone you know? OR could it be another conservative lie? You mean a true liberal, like yourself, isn't wired to the White House? http://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/Facts...ubborn-Things/ Shame on you. From the source, "Since we can’t keep track of all of them here at the White House, we’re asking for your help. If you get an email or see something on the web about health insurance reform that seems fishy, send it to ." Sounds like phishing to me. Haven't you been forwarding all the posts from folks not agreeing with Obama? -- John H "Socialism in general has a record of failure so blatant that only an intellectual could ignore or evade it." -- Thomas Sowell So you have something against them wanting to know where the lies from the right are being propagated? Even liberals are questioning it: "The ACLU said in a statement to FOXNews.com that the White House blog is a "bad idea that could send a troublesome message." I would have something against them maintaining the email addresses of those who disagreed with their policies. Yes. -- John H "BEND OVER - The 'change' is coming!" Sorry, we lost a lot of our civil liberties with Bush. Didn't seem like a problem for you at the time. The 'Bush Rationale' at its best. -- John H "BEND OVER - The 'change' is coming!" |
When the White House recieves...
JustWait wrote:
In article , says... Proprietario di Guzzi wrote: On Tue, 18 Aug 2009 10:25:51 -0400, NotNow wrote: Proprietario di Guzzi wrote: On Tue, 18 Aug 2009 09:04:01 -0400, NotNow wrote: JustWait wrote: In article , says... a 'fishy email' report, what does it do with the email. For example, if Loogy forwards an email from me to the White House, what happens to my email, name, etc.? The issue is not that. The concern is that someone sends the Whitehouse an email you wrote or forwarded and the headers show your email address. The Whitehouse can't erase that material for about a dozen years or so. The insinuation is that the Whitehouse possibly harvested a list from those emails and emailed "detractors" with a sales pitch.. I am not saying it happened, but that is the insinuation.. I'm betting that you think the Bush admin. did nothing like that, huh? I don't recall the Bush administration asking me to forward 'fishy' emails so the administration could take action. Do you have a reference? That's odd, I don't remember anyone from the Obama admin. contacting me to forward "fishy" emails. Did they contact you, or anyone you know? OR could it be another conservative lie? You mean a true liberal, like yourself, isn't wired to the White House? http://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/Facts...ubborn-Things/ Shame on you. From the source, "Since we can?t keep track of all of them here at the White House, we?re asking for your help. If you get an email or see something on the web about health insurance reform that seems fishy, send it to ." Sounds like phishing to me. Haven't you been forwarding all the posts from folks not agreeing with Obama? -- John H "Socialism in general has a record of failure so blatant that only an intellectual could ignore or evade it." -- Thomas Sowell So you have something against them wanting to know where the lies from the right are being propagated? No, but the constitution doesn't look kindly on these lists... Or direct personal attacks on private citizens from the Oval Office either, but that's another story.. Oh, wait, no it isn't...;) Nor the loss of our civil liberties through the Bush regime, but I didn't here the right complain about that! |
When the White House recieves...
In article ,
says... On Tue, 18 Aug 2009 13:01:16 -0400, NotNow wrote: Proprietario di Guzzi wrote: On Tue, 18 Aug 2009 10:25:51 -0400, NotNow wrote: Proprietario di Guzzi wrote: On Tue, 18 Aug 2009 09:04:01 -0400, NotNow wrote: JustWait wrote: In article , says... a 'fishy email' report, what does it do with the email. For example, if Loogy forwards an email from me to the White House, what happens to my email, name, etc.? The issue is not that. The concern is that someone sends the Whitehouse an email you wrote or forwarded and the headers show your email address. The Whitehouse can't erase that material for about a dozen years or so. The insinuation is that the Whitehouse possibly harvested a list from those emails and emailed "detractors" with a sales pitch.. I am not saying it happened, but that is the insinuation.. I'm betting that you think the Bush admin. did nothing like that, huh? I don't recall the Bush administration asking me to forward 'fishy' emails so the administration could take action. Do you have a reference? That's odd, I don't remember anyone from the Obama admin. contacting me to forward "fishy" emails. Did they contact you, or anyone you know? OR could it be another conservative lie? You mean a true liberal, like yourself, isn't wired to the White House? http://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/Facts...ubborn-Things/ Shame on you. From the source, "Since we can?t keep track of all of them here at the White House, we?re asking for your help. If you get an email or see something on the web about health insurance reform that seems fishy, send it to ." Sounds like phishing to me. Haven't you been forwarding all the posts from folks not agreeing with Obama? -- John H "Socialism in general has a record of failure so blatant that only an intellectual could ignore or evade it." -- Thomas Sowell So you have something against them wanting to know where the lies from the right are being propagated? Even liberals are questioning it: "The ACLU said in a statement to FOXNews.com that the White House blog is a "bad idea that could send a troublesome message." I would have something against them maintaining the email addresses of those who disagreed with their policies. Yes. Not to mention, it's against the law... -- Wafa free since 2009 |
When the White House recieves...
On Tue, 18 Aug 2009 14:55:13 -0400, NotNow wrote:
JustWait wrote: In article , says... Proprietario di Guzzi wrote: On Tue, 18 Aug 2009 10:25:51 -0400, NotNow wrote: Proprietario di Guzzi wrote: On Tue, 18 Aug 2009 09:04:01 -0400, NotNow wrote: JustWait wrote: In article , says... a 'fishy email' report, what does it do with the email. For example, if Loogy forwards an email from me to the White House, what happens to my email, name, etc.? The issue is not that. The concern is that someone sends the Whitehouse an email you wrote or forwarded and the headers show your email address. The Whitehouse can't erase that material for about a dozen years or so. The insinuation is that the Whitehouse possibly harvested a list from those emails and emailed "detractors" with a sales pitch.. I am not saying it happened, but that is the insinuation.. I'm betting that you think the Bush admin. did nothing like that, huh? I don't recall the Bush administration asking me to forward 'fishy' emails so the administration could take action. Do you have a reference? That's odd, I don't remember anyone from the Obama admin. contacting me to forward "fishy" emails. Did they contact you, or anyone you know? OR could it be another conservative lie? You mean a true liberal, like yourself, isn't wired to the White House? http://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/Facts...ubborn-Things/ Shame on you. From the source, "Since we can?t keep track of all of them here at the White House, we?re asking for your help. If you get an email or see something on the web about health insurance reform that seems fishy, send it to ." Sounds like phishing to me. Haven't you been forwarding all the posts from folks not agreeing with Obama? -- John H "Socialism in general has a record of failure so blatant that only an intellectual could ignore or evade it." -- Thomas Sowell So you have something against them wanting to know where the lies from the right are being propagated? No, but the constitution doesn't look kindly on these lists... Or direct personal attacks on private citizens from the Oval Office either, but that's another story.. Oh, wait, no it isn't...;) Nor the loss of our civil liberties through the Bush regime, but I didn't here the right complain about that! You're making use of the 'Bush Rationale' with much bravado. Just what civil liberty did you lose? (This should be fun!) -- John H "BEND OVER - The 'change' is coming!" |
When the White House recieves...
JustWait wrote:
In article , says... On Tue, 18 Aug 2009 13:01:16 -0400, NotNow wrote: "The ACLU said in a statement to FOXNews.com that the White House blog is a "bad idea that could send a troublesome message." I would have something against them maintaining the email addresses of those who disagreed with their policies. Yes. Not to mention, it's against the law... Which I believe was passed in the 70's long before there was a President Bush. |
When the White House recieves...
In article ,
says... Proprietario di Guzzi wrote: On Tue, 18 Aug 2009 13:01:16 -0400, NotNow wrote: Proprietario di Guzzi wrote: On Tue, 18 Aug 2009 10:25:51 -0400, NotNow wrote: Proprietario di Guzzi wrote: On Tue, 18 Aug 2009 09:04:01 -0400, NotNow wrote: JustWait wrote: In article , says... a 'fishy email' report, what does it do with the email. For example, if Loogy forwards an email from me to the White House, what happens to my email, name, etc.? The issue is not that. The concern is that someone sends the Whitehouse an email you wrote or forwarded and the headers show your email address. The Whitehouse can't erase that material for about a dozen years or so. The insinuation is that the Whitehouse possibly harvested a list from those emails and emailed "detractors" with a sales pitch.. I am not saying it happened, but that is the insinuation.. I'm betting that you think the Bush admin. did nothing like that, huh? I don't recall the Bush administration asking me to forward 'fishy' emails so the administration could take action. Do you have a reference? That's odd, I don't remember anyone from the Obama admin. contacting me to forward "fishy" emails. Did they contact you, or anyone you know? OR could it be another conservative lie? You mean a true liberal, like yourself, isn't wired to the White House? http://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/Facts...ubborn-Things/ Shame on you. From the source, "Since we can?t keep track of all of them here at the White House, we?re asking for your help. If you get an email or see something on the web about health insurance reform that seems fishy, send it to ." Sounds like phishing to me. Haven't you been forwarding all the posts from folks not agreeing with Obama? -- John H "Socialism in general has a record of failure so blatant that only an intellectual could ignore or evade it." -- Thomas Sowell So you have something against them wanting to know where the lies from the right are being propagated? Even liberals are questioning it: "The ACLU said in a statement to FOXNews.com that the White House blog is a "bad idea that could send a troublesome message." I would have something against them maintaining the email addresses of those who disagreed with their policies. Yes. -- John H "BEND OVER - The 'change' is coming!" Sorry, we lost a lot of our civil liberties with Bush. Didn't seem like a problem for you at the time. Please name a civil right you lost?? -- Wafa free since 2009 |
When the White House recieves...
Proprietario di Guzzi wrote:
On Tue, 18 Aug 2009 14:42:53 -0400, NotNow wrote: Proprietario di Guzzi wrote: On Tue, 18 Aug 2009 13:01:16 -0400, NotNow wrote: Proprietario di Guzzi wrote: On Tue, 18 Aug 2009 10:25:51 -0400, NotNow wrote: Proprietario di Guzzi wrote: On Tue, 18 Aug 2009 09:04:01 -0400, NotNow wrote: JustWait wrote: In article , says... a 'fishy email' report, what does it do with the email. For example, if Loogy forwards an email from me to the White House, what happens to my email, name, etc.? The issue is not that. The concern is that someone sends the Whitehouse an email you wrote or forwarded and the headers show your email address. The Whitehouse can't erase that material for about a dozen years or so. The insinuation is that the Whitehouse possibly harvested a list from those emails and emailed "detractors" with a sales pitch.. I am not saying it happened, but that is the insinuation.. I'm betting that you think the Bush admin. did nothing like that, huh? I don't recall the Bush administration asking me to forward 'fishy' emails so the administration could take action. Do you have a reference? That's odd, I don't remember anyone from the Obama admin. contacting me to forward "fishy" emails. Did they contact you, or anyone you know? OR could it be another conservative lie? You mean a true liberal, like yourself, isn't wired to the White House? http://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/Facts...ubborn-Things/ Shame on you. From the source, "Since we can’t keep track of all of them here at the White House, we’re asking for your help. If you get an email or see something on the web about health insurance reform that seems fishy, send it to ." Sounds like phishing to me. Haven't you been forwarding all the posts from folks not agreeing with Obama? -- John H "Socialism in general has a record of failure so blatant that only an intellectual could ignore or evade it." -- Thomas Sowell So you have something against them wanting to know where the lies from the right are being propagated? Even liberals are questioning it: "The ACLU said in a statement to FOXNews.com that the White House blog is a "bad idea that could send a troublesome message." I would have something against them maintaining the email addresses of those who disagreed with their policies. Yes. -- John H "BEND OVER - The 'change' is coming!" Sorry, we lost a lot of our civil liberties with Bush. Didn't seem like a problem for you at the time. The 'Bush Rationale' at its best. -- John H Thanks for agreeing! |
When the White House recieves...
Proprietario di Guzzi wrote:
On Tue, 18 Aug 2009 14:55:13 -0400, NotNow wrote: JustWait wrote: In article , says... Proprietario di Guzzi wrote: On Tue, 18 Aug 2009 10:25:51 -0400, NotNow wrote: Proprietario di Guzzi wrote: On Tue, 18 Aug 2009 09:04:01 -0400, NotNow wrote: JustWait wrote: In article , says... a 'fishy email' report, what does it do with the email. For example, if Loogy forwards an email from me to the White House, what happens to my email, name, etc.? The issue is not that. The concern is that someone sends the Whitehouse an email you wrote or forwarded and the headers show your email address. The Whitehouse can't erase that material for about a dozen years or so. The insinuation is that the Whitehouse possibly harvested a list from those emails and emailed "detractors" with a sales pitch.. I am not saying it happened, but that is the insinuation.. I'm betting that you think the Bush admin. did nothing like that, huh? I don't recall the Bush administration asking me to forward 'fishy' emails so the administration could take action. Do you have a reference? That's odd, I don't remember anyone from the Obama admin. contacting me to forward "fishy" emails. Did they contact you, or anyone you know? OR could it be another conservative lie? You mean a true liberal, like yourself, isn't wired to the White House? http://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/Facts...ubborn-Things/ Shame on you. From the source, "Since we can?t keep track of all of them here at the White House, we?re asking for your help. If you get an email or see something on the web about health insurance reform that seems fishy, send it to ." Sounds like phishing to me. Haven't you been forwarding all the posts from folks not agreeing with Obama? -- John H "Socialism in general has a record of failure so blatant that only an intellectual could ignore or evade it." -- Thomas Sowell So you have something against them wanting to know where the lies from the right are being propagated? No, but the constitution doesn't look kindly on these lists... Or direct personal attacks on private citizens from the Oval Office either, but that's another story.. Oh, wait, no it isn't...;) Nor the loss of our civil liberties through the Bush regime, but I didn't here the right complain about that! You're making use of the 'Bush Rationale' with much bravado. Just what civil liberty did you lose? (This should be fun!) -- John H "BEND OVER - The 'change' is coming!" Privacy. |
When the White House recieves...
JustWait wrote:
In article , says... Proprietario di Guzzi wrote: On Tue, 18 Aug 2009 13:01:16 -0400, NotNow wrote: Proprietario di Guzzi wrote: On Tue, 18 Aug 2009 10:25:51 -0400, NotNow wrote: Proprietario di Guzzi wrote: On Tue, 18 Aug 2009 09:04:01 -0400, NotNow wrote: JustWait wrote: In article , says... a 'fishy email' report, what does it do with the email. For example, if Loogy forwards an email from me to the White House, what happens to my email, name, etc.? The issue is not that. The concern is that someone sends the Whitehouse an email you wrote or forwarded and the headers show your email address. The Whitehouse can't erase that material for about a dozen years or so. The insinuation is that the Whitehouse possibly harvested a list from those emails and emailed "detractors" with a sales pitch.. I am not saying it happened, but that is the insinuation.. I'm betting that you think the Bush admin. did nothing like that, huh? I don't recall the Bush administration asking me to forward 'fishy' emails so the administration could take action. Do you have a reference? That's odd, I don't remember anyone from the Obama admin. contacting me to forward "fishy" emails. Did they contact you, or anyone you know? OR could it be another conservative lie? You mean a true liberal, like yourself, isn't wired to the White House? http://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/Facts...ubborn-Things/ Shame on you. From the source, "Since we can?t keep track of all of them here at the White House, we?re asking for your help. If you get an email or see something on the web about health insurance reform that seems fishy, send it to ." Sounds like phishing to me. Haven't you been forwarding all the posts from folks not agreeing with Obama? -- John H "Socialism in general has a record of failure so blatant that only an intellectual could ignore or evade it." -- Thomas Sowell So you have something against them wanting to know where the lies from the right are being propagated? Even liberals are questioning it: "The ACLU said in a statement to FOXNews.com that the White House blog is a "bad idea that could send a troublesome message." I would have something against them maintaining the email addresses of those who disagreed with their policies. Yes. -- John H "BEND OVER - The 'change' is coming!" Sorry, we lost a lot of our civil liberties with Bush. Didn't seem like a problem for you at the time. Please name a civil right you lost?? Here's several: http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/HL0307/S00041.htm http://www.historycommons.org/projec...civilliberties http://www.americanprogress.org/issu...of_rights.html |
When the White House recieves...
In article ,
says... Proprietario di Guzzi wrote: On Tue, 18 Aug 2009 14:42:53 -0400, NotNow wrote: Proprietario di Guzzi wrote: On Tue, 18 Aug 2009 13:01:16 -0400, NotNow wrote: Proprietario di Guzzi wrote: On Tue, 18 Aug 2009 10:25:51 -0400, NotNow wrote: Proprietario di Guzzi wrote: On Tue, 18 Aug 2009 09:04:01 -0400, NotNow wrote: JustWait wrote: In article , says... a 'fishy email' report, what does it do with the email. For example, if Loogy forwards an email from me to the White House, what happens to my email, name, etc.? The issue is not that. The concern is that someone sends the Whitehouse an email you wrote or forwarded and the headers show your email address. The Whitehouse can't erase that material for about a dozen years or so. The insinuation is that the Whitehouse possibly harvested a list from those emails and emailed "detractors" with a sales pitch.. I am not saying it happened, but that is the insinuation.. I'm betting that you think the Bush admin. did nothing like that, huh? I don't recall the Bush administration asking me to forward 'fishy' emails so the administration could take action. Do you have a reference? That's odd, I don't remember anyone from the Obama admin. contacting me to forward "fishy" emails. Did they contact you, or anyone you know? OR could it be another conservative lie? You mean a true liberal, like yourself, isn't wired to the White House? http://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/Facts...ubborn-Things/ Shame on you. From the source, "Since we can?t keep track of all of them here at the White House, we?re asking for your help. If you get an email or see something on the web about health insurance reform that seems fishy, send it to ." Sounds like phishing to me. Haven't you been forwarding all the posts from folks not agreeing with Obama? -- John H "Socialism in general has a record of failure so blatant that only an intellectual could ignore or evade it." -- Thomas Sowell So you have something against them wanting to know where the lies from the right are being propagated? Even liberals are questioning it: "The ACLU said in a statement to FOXNews.com that the White House blog is a "bad idea that could send a troublesome message." I would have something against them maintaining the email addresses of those who disagreed with their policies. Yes. -- John H "BEND OVER - The 'change' is coming!" Sorry, we lost a lot of our civil liberties with Bush. Didn't seem like a problem for you at the time. The 'Bush Rationale' at its best. -- John H Thanks for agreeing! The problem with the list is that it will turn into 25 hundred personal FBI files on these folks showing up in Michelle Obama's office 6 months after the court had ordered them returned... -- Wafa free since 2009 |
When the White House recieves...
In article ,
says... Proprietario di Guzzi wrote: On Tue, 18 Aug 2009 14:55:13 -0400, NotNow wrote: JustWait wrote: In article , says... Proprietario di Guzzi wrote: On Tue, 18 Aug 2009 10:25:51 -0400, NotNow wrote: Proprietario di Guzzi wrote: On Tue, 18 Aug 2009 09:04:01 -0400, NotNow wrote: JustWait wrote: In article , says... a 'fishy email' report, what does it do with the email. For example, if Loogy forwards an email from me to the White House, what happens to my email, name, etc.? The issue is not that. The concern is that someone sends the Whitehouse an email you wrote or forwarded and the headers show your email address. The Whitehouse can't erase that material for about a dozen years or so. The insinuation is that the Whitehouse possibly harvested a list from those emails and emailed "detractors" with a sales pitch.. I am not saying it happened, but that is the insinuation.. I'm betting that you think the Bush admin. did nothing like that, huh? I don't recall the Bush administration asking me to forward 'fishy' emails so the administration could take action. Do you have a reference? That's odd, I don't remember anyone from the Obama admin. contacting me to forward "fishy" emails. Did they contact you, or anyone you know? OR could it be another conservative lie? You mean a true liberal, like yourself, isn't wired to the White House? http://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/Facts...ubborn-Things/ Shame on you. From the source, "Since we can?t keep track of all of them here at the White House, we?re asking for your help. If you get an email or see something on the web about health insurance reform that seems fishy, send it to ." Sounds like phishing to me. Haven't you been forwarding all the posts from folks not agreeing with Obama? -- John H "Socialism in general has a record of failure so blatant that only an intellectual could ignore or evade it." -- Thomas Sowell So you have something against them wanting to know where the lies from the right are being propagated? No, but the constitution doesn't look kindly on these lists... Or direct personal attacks on private citizens from the Oval Office either, but that's another story.. Oh, wait, no it isn't...;) Nor the loss of our civil liberties through the Bush regime, but I didn't here the right complain about that! You're making use of the 'Bush Rationale' with much bravado. Just what civil liberty did you lose? (This should be fun!) -- John H "BEND OVER - The 'change' is coming!" Privacy. Really, what private information about you was gathered, and how was it used against you? Or are you still hawking the "library card" thing which of course was never used? -- Wafa free since 2009 |
When the White House recieves...
NotNow wrote:
JustWait wrote: In article , says... Proprietario di Guzzi wrote: On Tue, 18 Aug 2009 13:01:16 -0400, NotNow wrote: Proprietario di Guzzi wrote: On Tue, 18 Aug 2009 10:25:51 -0400, NotNow wrote: Proprietario di Guzzi wrote: On Tue, 18 Aug 2009 09:04:01 -0400, NotNow wrote: JustWait wrote: In article , says... a 'fishy email' report, what does it do with the email. For example, if Loogy forwards an email from me to the White House, what happens to my email, name, etc.? The issue is not that. The concern is that someone sends the Whitehouse an email you wrote or forwarded and the headers show your email address. The Whitehouse can't erase that material for about a dozen years or so. The insinuation is that the Whitehouse possibly harvested a list from those emails and emailed "detractors" with a sales pitch.. I am not saying it happened, but that is the insinuation.. I'm betting that you think the Bush admin. did nothing like that, huh? I don't recall the Bush administration asking me to forward 'fishy' emails so the administration could take action. Do you have a reference? That's odd, I don't remember anyone from the Obama admin. contacting me to forward "fishy" emails. Did they contact you, or anyone you know? OR could it be another conservative lie? You mean a true liberal, like yourself, isn't wired to the White House? http://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/Facts...ubborn-Things/ Shame on you. From the source, "Since we can?t keep track of all of them here at the White House, we?re asking for your help. If you get an email or see something on the web about health insurance reform that seems fishy, send it to ." Sounds like phishing to me. Haven't you been forwarding all the posts from folks not agreeing with Obama? -- John H "Socialism in general has a record of failure so blatant that only an intellectual could ignore or evade it." -- Thomas Sowell So you have something against them wanting to know where the lies from the right are being propagated? Even liberals are questioning it: "The ACLU said in a statement to FOXNews.com that the White House blog is a "bad idea that could send a troublesome message." I would have something against them maintaining the email addresses of those who disagreed with their policies. Yes. -- John H "BEND OVER - The 'change' is coming!" Sorry, we lost a lot of our civil liberties with Bush. Didn't seem like a problem for you at the time. Please name a civil right you lost?? Here's several: http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/HL0307/S00041.htm Go to a book store and purchase the book for cash. Public libraries are government entities. http://www.historycommons.org/projec...civilliberties http://www.americanprogress.org/issu...of_rights.html Where are the lawsuits of those who have had their civil rights curtailed. Have any of these lawsuits reached the Supreme Court? What is the disposition of those cases heard at the Supreme Court? |
When the White House recieves...
In article ,
says... JustWait wrote: In article , says... Proprietario di Guzzi wrote: On Tue, 18 Aug 2009 13:01:16 -0400, NotNow wrote: Proprietario di Guzzi wrote: On Tue, 18 Aug 2009 10:25:51 -0400, NotNow wrote: Proprietario di Guzzi wrote: On Tue, 18 Aug 2009 09:04:01 -0400, NotNow wrote: JustWait wrote: In article , says... a 'fishy email' report, what does it do with the email. For example, if Loogy forwards an email from me to the White House, what happens to my email, name, etc.? The issue is not that. The concern is that someone sends the Whitehouse an email you wrote or forwarded and the headers show your email address. The Whitehouse can't erase that material for about a dozen years or so. The insinuation is that the Whitehouse possibly harvested a list from those emails and emailed "detractors" with a sales pitch.. I am not saying it happened, but that is the insinuation.. I'm betting that you think the Bush admin. did nothing like that, huh? I don't recall the Bush administration asking me to forward 'fishy' emails so the administration could take action. Do you have a reference? That's odd, I don't remember anyone from the Obama admin. contacting me to forward "fishy" emails. Did they contact you, or anyone you know? OR could it be another conservative lie? You mean a true liberal, like yourself, isn't wired to the White House? http://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/Facts...ubborn-Things/ Shame on you. From the source, "Since we can?t keep track of all of them here at the White House, we?re asking for your help. If you get an email or see something on the web about health insurance reform that seems fishy, send it to ." Sounds like phishing to me. Haven't you been forwarding all the posts from folks not agreeing with Obama? -- John H "Socialism in general has a record of failure so blatant that only an intellectual could ignore or evade it." -- Thomas Sowell So you have something against them wanting to know where the lies from the right are being propagated? Even liberals are questioning it: "The ACLU said in a statement to FOXNews.com that the White House blog is a "bad idea that could send a troublesome message." I would have something against them maintaining the email addresses of those who disagreed with their policies. Yes. -- John H "BEND OVER - The 'change' is coming!" Sorry, we lost a lot of our civil liberties with Bush. Didn't seem like a problem for you at the time. Please name a civil right you lost?? Here's several: http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/HL0307/S00041.htm Was never used... http://www.historycommons.org/projec...civilliberties This took me to stuff about Nixon for God sakes.. What data sets are you looking at? Here is where your link took me when I clicked on "freedom of speech" http://www.historycommons.org/timeline.jsp? timeline=civilliberties&civilliberties_privacy=civ illiberties_freedom_of _speech Frekin' Nixon?? Man... http://www.americanprogress.org/issu...of_rights.html -- Wafa free since 2009 |
When the White House recieves...
JustWait wrote:
In article , says... Proprietario di Guzzi wrote: On Tue, 18 Aug 2009 14:55:13 -0400, NotNow wrote: JustWait wrote: In article , says... Proprietario di Guzzi wrote: On Tue, 18 Aug 2009 10:25:51 -0400, NotNow wrote: Proprietario di Guzzi wrote: On Tue, 18 Aug 2009 09:04:01 -0400, NotNow wrote: JustWait wrote: In article , says... a 'fishy email' report, what does it do with the email. For example, if Loogy forwards an email from me to the White House, what happens to my email, name, etc.? The issue is not that. The concern is that someone sends the Whitehouse an email you wrote or forwarded and the headers show your email address. The Whitehouse can't erase that material for about a dozen years or so. The insinuation is that the Whitehouse possibly harvested a list from those emails and emailed "detractors" with a sales pitch.. I am not saying it happened, but that is the insinuation.. I'm betting that you think the Bush admin. did nothing like that, huh? I don't recall the Bush administration asking me to forward 'fishy' emails so the administration could take action. Do you have a reference? That's odd, I don't remember anyone from the Obama admin. contacting me to forward "fishy" emails. Did they contact you, or anyone you know? OR could it be another conservative lie? You mean a true liberal, like yourself, isn't wired to the White House? http://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/Facts...ubborn-Things/ Shame on you. From the source, "Since we can?t keep track of all of them here at the White House, we?re asking for your help. If you get an email or see something on the web about health insurance reform that seems fishy, send it to ." Sounds like phishing to me. Haven't you been forwarding all the posts from folks not agreeing with Obama? -- John H "Socialism in general has a record of failure so blatant that only an intellectual could ignore or evade it." -- Thomas Sowell So you have something against them wanting to know where the lies from the right are being propagated? No, but the constitution doesn't look kindly on these lists... Or direct personal attacks on private citizens from the Oval Office either, but that's another story.. Oh, wait, no it isn't...;) Nor the loss of our civil liberties through the Bush regime, but I didn't here the right complain about that! You're making use of the 'Bush Rationale' with much bravado. Just what civil liberty did you lose? (This should be fun!) -- John H "BEND OVER - The 'change' is coming!" Privacy. Really, what private information about you was gathered, and how was it used against you? Or are you still hawking the "library card" thing which of course was never used? Uh, I take it you haven't read the act, huh? Student records, banking records, travel records, etc. CAPPS II program that mines public databases. The act also allows the government to eavesdrop on conservations between lawyer/client. After Cointelpro in the seventies, the FBI wasn't allowed to secretly attend religious or political meetings, until Bush overturned it. Bush had Brett Bursey arrested for threatining the safety of the President. What did he do? He carried a sign that said "No War For Oil". There's more if you need it. But then again, we all know anything Bush did = good. |
When the White House recieves...
|
When the White House recieves...
In article ,
says... NotNow wrote: JustWait wrote: In article , says... Proprietario di Guzzi wrote: On Tue, 18 Aug 2009 13:01:16 -0400, NotNow wrote: Proprietario di Guzzi wrote: On Tue, 18 Aug 2009 10:25:51 -0400, NotNow wrote: Proprietario di Guzzi wrote: On Tue, 18 Aug 2009 09:04:01 -0400, NotNow wrote: JustWait wrote: In article , says... a 'fishy email' report, what does it do with the email. For example, if Loogy forwards an email from me to the White House, what happens to my email, name, etc.? The issue is not that. The concern is that someone sends the Whitehouse an email you wrote or forwarded and the headers show your email address. The Whitehouse can't erase that material for about a dozen years or so. The insinuation is that the Whitehouse possibly harvested a list from those emails and emailed "detractors" with a sales pitch.. I am not saying it happened, but that is the insinuation.. I'm betting that you think the Bush admin. did nothing like that, huh? I don't recall the Bush administration asking me to forward 'fishy' emails so the administration could take action. Do you have a reference? That's odd, I don't remember anyone from the Obama admin. contacting me to forward "fishy" emails. Did they contact you, or anyone you know? OR could it be another conservative lie? You mean a true liberal, like yourself, isn't wired to the White House? http://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/Facts...ubborn-Things/ Shame on you. From the source, "Since we can?t keep track of all of them here at the White House, we?re asking for your help. If you get an email or see something on the web about health insurance reform that seems fishy, send it to ." Sounds like phishing to me. Haven't you been forwarding all the posts from folks not agreeing with Obama? -- John H "Socialism in general has a record of failure so blatant that only an intellectual could ignore or evade it." -- Thomas Sowell So you have something against them wanting to know where the lies from the right are being propagated? Even liberals are questioning it: "The ACLU said in a statement to FOXNews.com that the White House blog is a "bad idea that could send a troublesome message." I would have something against them maintaining the email addresses of those who disagreed with their policies. Yes. -- John H "BEND OVER - The 'change' is coming!" Sorry, we lost a lot of our civil liberties with Bush. Didn't seem like a problem for you at the time. Please name a civil right you lost?? Here's several: http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/HL0307/S00041.htm Go to a book store and purchase the book for cash. Public libraries are government entities. http://www.historycommons.org/projec...civilliberties http://www.americanprogress.org/issu...of_rights.html Where are the lawsuits of those who have had their civil rights curtailed. Have any of these lawsuits reached the Supreme Court? What is the disposition of those cases heard at the Supreme Court? Nada.... -- Wafa free since 2009 |
When the White House recieves...
|
When the White House recieves...
JustWait wrote:
In article , says... NotNow wrote: JustWait wrote: In article , says... Proprietario di Guzzi wrote: On Tue, 18 Aug 2009 13:01:16 -0400, NotNow wrote: Proprietario di Guzzi wrote: On Tue, 18 Aug 2009 10:25:51 -0400, NotNow wrote: Proprietario di Guzzi wrote: On Tue, 18 Aug 2009 09:04:01 -0400, NotNow wrote: JustWait wrote: In article , says... a 'fishy email' report, what does it do with the email. For example, if Loogy forwards an email from me to the White House, what happens to my email, name, etc.? The issue is not that. The concern is that someone sends the Whitehouse an email you wrote or forwarded and the headers show your email address. The Whitehouse can't erase that material for about a dozen years or so. The insinuation is that the Whitehouse possibly harvested a list from those emails and emailed "detractors" with a sales pitch.. I am not saying it happened, but that is the insinuation.. I'm betting that you think the Bush admin. did nothing like that, huh? I don't recall the Bush administration asking me to forward 'fishy' emails so the administration could take action. Do you have a reference? That's odd, I don't remember anyone from the Obama admin. contacting me to forward "fishy" emails. Did they contact you, or anyone you know? OR could it be another conservative lie? You mean a true liberal, like yourself, isn't wired to the White House? http://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/Facts...ubborn-Things/ Shame on you. From the source, "Since we can?t keep track of all of them here at the White House, we?re asking for your help. If you get an email or see something on the web about health insurance reform that seems fishy, send it to ." Sounds like phishing to me. Haven't you been forwarding all the posts from folks not agreeing with Obama? -- John H "Socialism in general has a record of failure so blatant that only an intellectual could ignore or evade it." -- Thomas Sowell So you have something against them wanting to know where the lies from the right are being propagated? Even liberals are questioning it: "The ACLU said in a statement to FOXNews.com that the White House blog is a "bad idea that could send a troublesome message." I would have something against them maintaining the email addresses of those who disagreed with their policies. Yes. -- John H "BEND OVER - The 'change' is coming!" Sorry, we lost a lot of our civil liberties with Bush. Didn't seem like a problem for you at the time. Please name a civil right you lost?? Here's several: http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/HL0307/S00041.htm Go to a book store and purchase the book for cash. Public libraries are government entities. http://www.historycommons.org/projec...civilliberties http://www.americanprogress.org/issu...of_rights.html Where are the lawsuits of those who have had their civil rights curtailed. Have any of these lawsuits reached the Supreme Court? What is the disposition of those cases heard at the Supreme Court? Nada.... Because someone doesn't try to sue the U.S. Government that pays hundred of thousands of lawyers' paychecks, means that they didn't have their civil rights stepped on????!!!! Unbelievable how far you guys will go to make the Republican party look good....... |
When the White House recieves...
In article ,
says... JustWait wrote: In article , says... NotNow wrote: JustWait wrote: In article , says... Proprietario di Guzzi wrote: On Tue, 18 Aug 2009 13:01:16 -0400, NotNow wrote: Proprietario di Guzzi wrote: On Tue, 18 Aug 2009 10:25:51 -0400, NotNow wrote: Proprietario di Guzzi wrote: On Tue, 18 Aug 2009 09:04:01 -0400, NotNow wrote: JustWait wrote: In article , says... a 'fishy email' report, what does it do with the email. For example, if Loogy forwards an email from me to the White House, what happens to my email, name, etc.? The issue is not that. The concern is that someone sends the Whitehouse an email you wrote or forwarded and the headers show your email address. The Whitehouse can't erase that material for about a dozen years or so. The insinuation is that the Whitehouse possibly harvested a list from those emails and emailed "detractors" with a sales pitch.. I am not saying it happened, but that is the insinuation.. I'm betting that you think the Bush admin. did nothing like that, huh? I don't recall the Bush administration asking me to forward 'fishy' emails so the administration could take action. Do you have a reference? That's odd, I don't remember anyone from the Obama admin. contacting me to forward "fishy" emails. Did they contact you, or anyone you know? OR could it be another conservative lie? You mean a true liberal, like yourself, isn't wired to the White House? http://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/Facts...ubborn-Things/ Shame on you. From the source, "Since we can?t keep track of all of them here at the White House, we?re asking for your help. If you get an email or see something on the web about health insurance reform that seems fishy, send it to ." Sounds like phishing to me. Haven't you been forwarding all the posts from folks not agreeing with Obama? -- John H "Socialism in general has a record of failure so blatant that only an intellectual could ignore or evade it." -- Thomas Sowell So you have something against them wanting to know where the lies from the right are being propagated? Even liberals are questioning it: "The ACLU said in a statement to FOXNews.com that the White House blog is a "bad idea that could send a troublesome message." I would have something against them maintaining the email addresses of those who disagreed with their policies. Yes. -- John H "BEND OVER - The 'change' is coming!" Sorry, we lost a lot of our civil liberties with Bush. Didn't seem like a problem for you at the time. Please name a civil right you lost?? Here's several: http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/HL0307/S00041.htm Go to a book store and purchase the book for cash. Public libraries are government entities. http://www.historycommons.org/projec...civilliberties http://www.americanprogress.org/issu...of_rights.html Where are the lawsuits of those who have had their civil rights curtailed. Have any of these lawsuits reached the Supreme Court? What is the disposition of those cases heard at the Supreme Court? Nada.... Because someone doesn't try to sue the U.S. Government that pays hundred of thousands of lawyers' paychecks, means that they didn't have their civil rights stepped on????!!!! Unbelievable how far you guys will go to make the Republican party look good....... He asked a question, I answered it truthfully... It had nothing to do with republicans... Going to the track this afternoon to work out for the weekend races in Maine... I hate camping. Used to like it as a kid, but now it just sucks. At least I camp with our race partners who have a hauler with a shower... Got to change a tube today in this heat trackside, ugh... RMR, see you at the track -- Wafa free since 2009 |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:13 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com