![]() |
Clubs open their books for Justhate, Jackoff, Bar, Krueger,Herring, et al
Tim wrote:
On Aug 14, 5:04 pm, H the K wrote: Calif Bill wrote: "JLH LXV" wrote in message ... On Thu, 13 Aug 2009 19:47:36 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote: On Aug 13, 8:15 pm, H the K wrote: Officials see rise in militia groups across U.S. "The man is holding an AR-15 semiautomatic rifle, and he encourages viewers to buy one." Hey, those are really good rifles to have. very accurate and the action works well, but you gotta keep 'em clean. I think I'd like to take one to Camp Roberts, CA, and spend a day hunting prairie dogs with an AR-15. That would be some kick-ass fun, and help with the prairie dog infestation. -- John H All decisions, even those made by liberals, are the result of binary thinking. No prairie dogs at Roberts. They is ground squirrels and they have had a population explosion everywhere this year. Doubtful herring could hit either a prairie dog or a ground squirrel with that sort of rifle or, in fact, any other kind of firearm, unless the critter was three feet away with its tail tied to a fence post. Well Harry, I think the results would be quite interesting to hand John or Tom a quality M1, or M1-A and go to the 400m range with them. I'm speculating that after maybe one or two windage rounds you wouldn't see "maggie's drawers" again. It's amazing to go to Camp Perry, and observe a few veterans of the Korean war and see what they can still do with an M-1 Garrand. ...very VERY impressive. OS-OK. Additional comment... While I wouldn't stand downrange of anyone firing a weapon, 400 meters is a quarter of a mile. I think herring could fire off rounds all day long on a standard sight miiltary rifle like the ones you've offered up, and if he ever hit a metal pieplate target (the size of a man's head) at that distance, it would be pure coincidence. Unless it were painted orange, I doubt herring could even see such a target, much less sight in the rifle while locking in the target. I've seen his glasses. There aren't many 60+ year old guys around who could use a standard-issue military rifle to bang rounds off a metal pieplate at 400 meters, especially guys who don't shoot regularly. Sorry, your pants are on fire. |
Clubs open their books for Justhate, Jackoff, Bar, Krueger, Herring, et al
On Sat, 15 Aug 2009 08:18:57 -0400, H the K
wrote: Tim wrote: On Aug 14, 5:04 pm, H the K wrote: Calif Bill wrote: "JLH LXV" wrote in message ... On Thu, 13 Aug 2009 19:47:36 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote: On Aug 13, 8:15 pm, H the K wrote: Officials see rise in militia groups across U.S. "The man is holding an AR-15 semiautomatic rifle, and he encourages viewers to buy one." Hey, those are really good rifles to have. very accurate and the action works well, but you gotta keep 'em clean. I think I'd like to take one to Camp Roberts, CA, and spend a day hunting prairie dogs with an AR-15. That would be some kick-ass fun, and help with the prairie dog infestation. -- John H All decisions, even those made by liberals, are the result of binary thinking. No prairie dogs at Roberts. They is ground squirrels and they have had a population explosion everywhere this year. Doubtful herring could hit either a prairie dog or a ground squirrel with that sort of rifle or, in fact, any other kind of firearm, unless the critter was three feet away with its tail tied to a fence post. Well Harry, I think the results would be quite interesting to hand John or Tom a quality M1, or M1-A and go to the 400m range with them. I'm speculating that after maybe one or two windage rounds you wouldn't see "maggie's drawers" again. It's amazing to go to Camp Perry, and observe a few veterans of the Korean war and see what they can still do with an M-1 Garrand. ...very VERY impressive. OS-OK. Additional comment... While I wouldn't stand downrange of anyone firing a weapon, 400 meters is a quarter of a mile. I think herring could fire off rounds all day long on a standard sight miiltary rifle like the ones you've offered up, and if he ever hit a metal pieplate target (the size of a man's head) at that distance, it would be pure coincidence. Unless it were painted orange, I doubt herring could even see such a target, much less sight in the rifle while locking in the target. I've seen his glasses. There aren't many 60+ year old guys around who could use a standard-issue military rifle to bang rounds off a metal pieplate at 400 meters, especially guys who don't shoot regularly. Sorry, your pants are on fire. Following a golf ball 300 yards is a real bitch too. You're a joke, Harry. Pretend not to see this. -- John H All decisions, even those made by liberals, are the result of binary thinking. |
Clubs open their books for Justhate, Jackoff, Bar, Krueger,Herring, et al
On Aug 15, 7:18*am, H the K wrote:
Tim wrote: On Aug 14, 5:04 pm, H the K wrote: Calif Bill wrote: "JLH LXV" wrote in message ... On Thu, 13 Aug 2009 19:47:36 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote: On Aug 13, 8:15 pm, H the K wrote: Officials see rise in militia groups across U.S. "The man is holding an AR-15 semiautomatic rifle, and he encourages viewers to buy one." Hey, those are really good rifles to have. very accurate and the action works well, but you gotta keep 'em clean. I think I'd like to take one to Camp Roberts, CA, and spend a day hunting prairie dogs with an AR-15. That would be some kick-ass fun, and help with the prairie dog infestation. -- John H All decisions, even those made by liberals, are the result of binary thinking. No prairie dogs at Roberts. *They is ground squirrels and they have had a population explosion everywhere this year. Doubtful herring could hit either a prairie dog or a ground squirrel with that sort of rifle or, in fact, any other kind of firearm, unless the critter was three feet away with its tail tied to a fence post. Well Harry, I think the results *would be quite interesting to hand John or Tom a quality M1, or M1-A and go to the 400m range with them. I'm speculating that after maybe one or two windage rounds you wouldn't see "maggie's drawers" again. It's amazing to go to Camp Perry, and observe a *few veterans of the Korean war *and see what they can still do with an M-1 Garrand. *...very VERY impressive. OS-OK. Additional comment... While I wouldn't stand downrange of anyone firing a weapon, 400 meters is a quarter of a mile. I think herring could fire off rounds all day long on a standard sight miiltary rifle like the ones you've offered up, and if he ever hit a metal pieplate target (the size of a man's head) at that distance, it would be pure coincidence. Unless it were painted orange, I doubt herring could even see such a target, much less sight in the rifle while locking in the target. I've seen his glasses. There aren't many 60+ year old guys around who could use a standard-issue military rifle to bang rounds off a metal pieplate at 400 meters, especially guys who don't shoot regularly. Sorry, your pants are on fire. I wasn't talking about pie plates, Harry. |
Clubs open their books for Justhate, Jackoff, Bar, Krueger,Herring, et al
Tim wrote:
On Aug 15, 7:18 am, H the K wrote: Tim wrote: On Aug 14, 5:04 pm, H the K wrote: Calif Bill wrote: "JLH LXV" wrote in message ... On Thu, 13 Aug 2009 19:47:36 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote: On Aug 13, 8:15 pm, H the K wrote: Officials see rise in militia groups across U.S. "The man is holding an AR-15 semiautomatic rifle, and he encourages viewers to buy one." Hey, those are really good rifles to have. very accurate and the action works well, but you gotta keep 'em clean. I think I'd like to take one to Camp Roberts, CA, and spend a day hunting prairie dogs with an AR-15. That would be some kick-ass fun, and help with the prairie dog infestation. -- John H All decisions, even those made by liberals, are the result of binary thinking. No prairie dogs at Roberts. They is ground squirrels and they have had a population explosion everywhere this year. Doubtful herring could hit either a prairie dog or a ground squirrel with that sort of rifle or, in fact, any other kind of firearm, unless the critter was three feet away with its tail tied to a fence post. Well Harry, I think the results would be quite interesting to hand John or Tom a quality M1, or M1-A and go to the 400m range with them. I'm speculating that after maybe one or two windage rounds you wouldn't see "maggie's drawers" again. It's amazing to go to Camp Perry, and observe a few veterans of the Korean war and see what they can still do with an M-1 Garrand. ...very VERY impressive. OS-OK. Additional comment... While I wouldn't stand downrange of anyone firing a weapon, 400 meters is a quarter of a mile. I think herring could fire off rounds all day long on a standard sight miiltary rifle like the ones you've offered up, and if he ever hit a metal pieplate target (the size of a man's head) at that distance, it would be pure coincidence. Unless it were painted orange, I doubt herring could even see such a target, much less sight in the rifle while locking in the target. I've seen his glasses. There aren't many 60+ year old guys around who could use a standard-issue military rifle to bang rounds off a metal pieplate at 400 meters, especially guys who don't shoot regularly. Sorry, your pants are on fire. I wasn't talking about pie plates, Harry. Well, that's my point of reference for bare metal sights and 100-yard and plus rifle shooting...8" paper targets mounted on cardboard *or* preferably 8" steel pieplates. I suppose if you set up a target the size of a car at 400 meters, it would be a mite easier. Or a barn. My comments about herring stand, though, and I'd double-down on that, knowing he probably hasn't shot a rifle regularly in many years. I have 20/20 and 20/30 eyesight, but if I am shooting long range via typical metal sights, I have a pair of shooting glasses I use that put the target a bit out of the sharpest zone but let me see bare metal sights properly. That's usually enough for me to hit the pieplate at long distances. I've never shot targets at 400 meters. I shoot at "combat" and target distances, usually seven, fifteen, twenty five, fifty and one hundred yards. If I had a place to shoot those 400 meter shots, though, I'd be using a bolt action rifle, not a garand or one of its successors. I have a buddy with a Gustav Mauser CG 68 that I've shot a few times and it seems pretty accurate, though I have no idea what it would do at 400 meters. |
Clubs open their books for Justhate, Jackoff, Bar, Krueger,Herring, et al
On Aug 15, 8:18*am, H the K wrote:
Tim wrote: On Aug 15, 7:18 am, H the K wrote: Tim wrote: On Aug 14, 5:04 pm, H the K wrote: Calif Bill wrote: "JLH LXV" wrote in message om... On Thu, 13 Aug 2009 19:47:36 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote: On Aug 13, 8:15 pm, H the K wrote: Officials see rise in militia groups across U.S. "The man is holding an AR-15 semiautomatic rifle, and he encourages viewers to buy one." Hey, those are really good rifles to have. very accurate and the action works well, but you gotta keep 'em clean. I think I'd like to take one to Camp Roberts, CA, and spend a day hunting prairie dogs with an AR-15. That would be some kick-ass fun, and help with the prairie dog infestation. -- John H All decisions, even those made by liberals, are the result of binary thinking. No prairie dogs at Roberts. *They is ground squirrels and they have had a population explosion everywhere this year. Doubtful herring could hit either a prairie dog or a ground squirrel with that sort of rifle or, in fact, any other kind of firearm, unless the critter was three feet away with its tail tied to a fence post. Well Harry, I think the results *would be quite interesting to hand John or Tom a quality M1, or M1-A and go to the 400m range with them. I'm speculating that after maybe one or two windage rounds you wouldn't see "maggie's drawers" again. It's amazing to go to Camp Perry, and observe a *few veterans of the Korean war *and see what they can still do with an M-1 Garrand. *...very VERY impressive. OS-OK. Additional comment... While I wouldn't stand downrange of anyone firing a weapon, 400 meters is a quarter of a mile. I think herring could fire off rounds all day long on a standard sight miiltary rifle like the ones you've offered up, and if he ever hit a metal pieplate target (the size of a man's head) at that distance, it would be pure coincidence. Unless it were painted orange, I doubt herring could even see such a target, much less sight in the rifle while locking in the target. I've seen his glasses. There aren't many 60+ year old guys around who could use a standard-issue military rifle to bang rounds off a metal pieplate at 400 meters, especially guys who don't shoot regularly. Sorry, your pants are on fire. I wasn't talking about pie plates, Harry. Well, that's my point of reference for bare metal sights and 100-yard and plus rifle shooting...8" paper targets mounted on cardboard *or* preferably 8" steel pieplates. I suppose if you set up a target the size of a car at 400 meters, it would be a mite easier. Or a barn. My comments about herring stand, though, and I'd double-down on that, knowing he probably hasn't shot a rifle regularly in many years. I have 20/20 and 20/30 eyesight, but if I am shooting long range via typical metal sights, I have a pair of shooting glasses I use that put the target a bit out of the sharpest zone but let me see bare metal sights properly. That's usually enough for me to hit the pieplate at long distances. I've never shot targets at 400 meters. I shoot at "combat" and target distances, usually seven, fifteen, twenty five, fifty and one hundred yards. If I had a place to shoot those 400 meter shots, though, I'd be using a bolt action rifle, not a garand or one of its successors. I have a buddy with a Gustav Mauser CG 68 that I've shot a few times and it seems pretty accurate, though I have no idea what it would do at 400 meters. 6.5x55 swede's are pretty good stuff. Especially that Husquavarna your friend has. I have a Ljungman in the same caliber. The sight range is up to 700m, which doesn't necessarily mean you'll hit anything at that distance, but you might get lucky. http://mauser98.com/ljungmanbench.jpg The Swedes are like the Swiss. they built high quality fire arms and never really needed to use them. |
Clubs open their books for Justhate, Jackoff, Bar, Krueger,Herring, et al
Tim wrote:
On Aug 15, 8:18 am, H the K wrote: Tim wrote: On Aug 15, 7:18 am, H the K wrote: Tim wrote: On Aug 14, 5:04 pm, H the K wrote: Calif Bill wrote: "JLH LXV" wrote in message ... On Thu, 13 Aug 2009 19:47:36 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote: On Aug 13, 8:15 pm, H the K wrote: Officials see rise in militia groups across U.S. "The man is holding an AR-15 semiautomatic rifle, and he encourages viewers to buy one." Hey, those are really good rifles to have. very accurate and the action works well, but you gotta keep 'em clean. I think I'd like to take one to Camp Roberts, CA, and spend a day hunting prairie dogs with an AR-15. That would be some kick-ass fun, and help with the prairie dog infestation. -- John H All decisions, even those made by liberals, are the result of binary thinking. No prairie dogs at Roberts. They is ground squirrels and they have had a population explosion everywhere this year. Doubtful herring could hit either a prairie dog or a ground squirrel with that sort of rifle or, in fact, any other kind of firearm, unless the critter was three feet away with its tail tied to a fence post. Well Harry, I think the results would be quite interesting to hand John or Tom a quality M1, or M1-A and go to the 400m range with them. I'm speculating that after maybe one or two windage rounds you wouldn't see "maggie's drawers" again. It's amazing to go to Camp Perry, and observe a few veterans of the Korean war and see what they can still do with an M-1 Garrand. ...very VERY impressive. OS-OK. Additional comment... While I wouldn't stand downrange of anyone firing a weapon, 400 meters is a quarter of a mile. I think herring could fire off rounds all day long on a standard sight miiltary rifle like the ones you've offered up, and if he ever hit a metal pieplate target (the size of a man's head) at that distance, it would be pure coincidence. Unless it were painted orange, I doubt herring could even see such a target, much less sight in the rifle while locking in the target. I've seen his glasses. There aren't many 60+ year old guys around who could use a standard-issue military rifle to bang rounds off a metal pieplate at 400 meters, especially guys who don't shoot regularly. Sorry, your pants are on fire. I wasn't talking about pie plates, Harry. Well, that's my point of reference for bare metal sights and 100-yard and plus rifle shooting...8" paper targets mounted on cardboard *or* preferably 8" steel pieplates. I suppose if you set up a target the size of a car at 400 meters, it would be a mite easier. Or a barn. My comments about herring stand, though, and I'd double-down on that, knowing he probably hasn't shot a rifle regularly in many years. I have 20/20 and 20/30 eyesight, but if I am shooting long range via typical metal sights, I have a pair of shooting glasses I use that put the target a bit out of the sharpest zone but let me see bare metal sights properly. That's usually enough for me to hit the pieplate at long distances. I've never shot targets at 400 meters. I shoot at "combat" and target distances, usually seven, fifteen, twenty five, fifty and one hundred yards. If I had a place to shoot those 400 meter shots, though, I'd be using a bolt action rifle, not a garand or one of its successors. I have a buddy with a Gustav Mauser CG 68 that I've shot a few times and it seems pretty accurate, though I have no idea what it would do at 400 meters. 6.5x55 swede's are pretty good stuff. Especially that Husquavarna your friend has. I have a Ljungman in the same caliber. The sight range is up to 700m, which doesn't necessarily mean you'll hit anything at that distance, but you might get lucky. http://mauser98.com/ljungmanbench.jpg The Swedes are like the Swiss. they built high quality fire arms and never really needed to use them. Bought any 6.55 ammo lately? Holy tamale. My buddy bought his at a Virginia pawn shop, and practically stole it, since all the numbers match, it had a full accessory kit, and looked damned close to unfired. He made an attempt to trace its history, but I don't think he had much success. He uses it as his "deer" rifle. When I accompany him, I bring a box of ammo and use it to put soda cans into low earth orbit. |
Clubs open their books for Justhate, Jackoff, Bar, Krueger,Herring, et al
On Aug 15, 2:05*pm, H the K wrote:
Tim wrote: On Aug 15, 8:18 am, H the K wrote: Tim wrote: On Aug 15, 7:18 am, H the K wrote: Tim wrote: On Aug 14, 5:04 pm, H the K wrote: Calif Bill wrote: "JLH LXV" wrote in message news:e6ga85thoa1vi0k5ta4cr0713jqnp1ucvj@4ax .com... On Thu, 13 Aug 2009 19:47:36 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote: On Aug 13, 8:15 pm, H the K wrote: Officials see rise in militia groups across U.S. "The man is holding an AR-15 semiautomatic rifle, and he encourages viewers to buy one." Hey, those are really good rifles to have. very accurate and the action works well, but you gotta keep 'em clean. I think I'd like to take one to Camp Roberts, CA, and spend a day hunting prairie dogs with an AR-15. That would be some kick-ass fun, and help with the prairie dog infestation. -- John H All decisions, even those made by liberals, are the result of binary thinking. No prairie dogs at Roberts. *They is ground squirrels and they have had a population explosion everywhere this year. Doubtful herring could hit either a prairie dog or a ground squirrel with that sort of rifle or, in fact, any other kind of firearm, unless the critter was three feet away with its tail tied to a fence post.. Well Harry, I think the results *would be quite interesting to hand John or Tom a quality M1, or M1-A and go to the 400m range with them. I'm speculating that after maybe one or two windage rounds you wouldn't see "maggie's drawers" again. It's amazing to go to Camp Perry, and observe a *few veterans of the Korean war *and see what they can still do with an M-1 Garrand. *...very VERY impressive. OS-OK. Additional comment... While I wouldn't stand downrange of anyone firing a weapon, 400 meters is a quarter of a mile. I think herring could fire off rounds all day long on a standard sight miiltary rifle like the ones you've offered up, and if he ever hit a metal pieplate target (the size of a man's head) at that distance, it would be pure coincidence. Unless it were painted orange, I doubt herring could even see such a target, much less sight in the rifle while locking in the target. I've seen his glasses. There aren't many 60+ year old guys around who could use a standard-issue military rifle to bang rounds off a metal pieplate at 400 meters, especially guys who don't shoot regularly. Sorry, your pants are on fire. I wasn't talking about pie plates, Harry. Well, that's my point of reference for bare metal sights and 100-yard and plus rifle shooting...8" paper targets mounted on cardboard *or* preferably 8" steel pieplates. I suppose if you set up a target the size of a car at 400 meters, it would be a mite easier. Or a barn. My comments about herring stand, though, and I'd double-down on that, knowing he probably hasn't shot a rifle regularly in many years. I have 20/20 and 20/30 eyesight, but if I am shooting long range via typical metal sights, I have a pair of shooting glasses I use that put the target a bit out of the sharpest zone but let me see bare metal sights properly. That's usually enough for me to hit the pieplate at long distances. I've never shot targets at 400 meters. I shoot at "combat" and target distances, usually seven, fifteen, twenty five, fifty and one hundred yards. If I had a place to shoot those 400 meter shots, though, I'd be using a bolt action rifle, not a garand or one of its successors. I have a buddy with a Gustav Mauser CG 68 that I've shot a few times and it seems pretty accurate, though I have no idea what it would do at 400 meters. 6.5x55 swede's are pretty good stuff. Especially that Husquavarna your friend has. I have a Ljungman in the same caliber. The sight range is up to 700m, which doesn't necessarily mean you'll hit anything at that distance, but you might get lucky. http://mauser98.com/ljungmanbench.jpg The Swedes are like the Swiss. they built high quality fire arms and never really *needed to use them. Bought any 6.55 ammo lately? Holy tamale. My buddy bought his at a Virginia pawn shop, and practically stole it, since all the numbers match, it had a full accessory kit, and looked damned close to unfired. He made an attempt to trace its history, but I don't think he had much success. No I haven't I bought But I bought 700 rds about 15 yr.s ago in unissued Military ball 1953, But I can imagine tht the rices have gone way up! I imagine it was practically brand new seeing it was probably used only for a trainer. He uses it as his "deer" rifle. When I accompany him, I bring a box of ammo and use it to put soda cans into low earth orbit. man, that's an awful expensive plinker. |
Clubs open their books for Justhate, Jackoff, Bar, Krueger,Herring, et al
Tim wrote:
On Aug 15, 2:05 pm, H the K wrote: Tim wrote: On Aug 15, 8:18 am, H the K wrote: Tim wrote: On Aug 15, 7:18 am, H the K wrote: Tim wrote: On Aug 14, 5:04 pm, H the K wrote: Calif Bill wrote: "JLH LXV" wrote in message ... On Thu, 13 Aug 2009 19:47:36 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote: On Aug 13, 8:15 pm, H the K wrote: Officials see rise in militia groups across U.S. "The man is holding an AR-15 semiautomatic rifle, and he encourages viewers to buy one." Hey, those are really good rifles to have. very accurate and the action works well, but you gotta keep 'em clean. I think I'd like to take one to Camp Roberts, CA, and spend a day hunting prairie dogs with an AR-15. That would be some kick-ass fun, and help with the prairie dog infestation. -- John H All decisions, even those made by liberals, are the result of binary thinking. No prairie dogs at Roberts. They is ground squirrels and they have had a population explosion everywhere this year. Doubtful herring could hit either a prairie dog or a ground squirrel with that sort of rifle or, in fact, any other kind of firearm, unless the critter was three feet away with its tail tied to a fence post. Well Harry, I think the results would be quite interesting to hand John or Tom a quality M1, or M1-A and go to the 400m range with them. I'm speculating that after maybe one or two windage rounds you wouldn't see "maggie's drawers" again. It's amazing to go to Camp Perry, and observe a few veterans of the Korean war and see what they can still do with an M-1 Garrand. ...very VERY impressive. OS-OK. Additional comment... While I wouldn't stand downrange of anyone firing a weapon, 400 meters is a quarter of a mile. I think herring could fire off rounds all day long on a standard sight miiltary rifle like the ones you've offered up, and if he ever hit a metal pieplate target (the size of a man's head) at that distance, it would be pure coincidence. Unless it were painted orange, I doubt herring could even see such a target, much less sight in the rifle while locking in the target. I've seen his glasses. There aren't many 60+ year old guys around who could use a standard-issue military rifle to bang rounds off a metal pieplate at 400 meters, especially guys who don't shoot regularly. Sorry, your pants are on fire. I wasn't talking about pie plates, Harry. Well, that's my point of reference for bare metal sights and 100-yard and plus rifle shooting...8" paper targets mounted on cardboard *or* preferably 8" steel pieplates. I suppose if you set up a target the size of a car at 400 meters, it would be a mite easier. Or a barn. My comments about herring stand, though, and I'd double-down on that, knowing he probably hasn't shot a rifle regularly in many years. I have 20/20 and 20/30 eyesight, but if I am shooting long range via typical metal sights, I have a pair of shooting glasses I use that put the target a bit out of the sharpest zone but let me see bare metal sights properly. That's usually enough for me to hit the pieplate at long distances. I've never shot targets at 400 meters. I shoot at "combat" and target distances, usually seven, fifteen, twenty five, fifty and one hundred yards. If I had a place to shoot those 400 meter shots, though, I'd be using a bolt action rifle, not a garand or one of its successors. I have a buddy with a Gustav Mauser CG 68 that I've shot a few times and it seems pretty accurate, though I have no idea what it would do at 400 meters. 6.5x55 swede's are pretty good stuff. Especially that Husquavarna your friend has. I have a Ljungman in the same caliber. The sight range is up to 700m, which doesn't necessarily mean you'll hit anything at that distance, but you might get lucky. http://mauser98.com/ljungmanbench.jpg The Swedes are like the Swiss. they built high quality fire arms and never really needed to use them. Bought any 6.55 ammo lately? Holy tamale. My buddy bought his at a Virginia pawn shop, and practically stole it, since all the numbers match, it had a full accessory kit, and looked damned close to unfired. He made an attempt to trace its history, but I don't think he had much success. No I haven't I bought But I bought 700 rds about 15 yr.s ago in unissued Military ball 1953, But I can imagine tht the rices have gone way up! I imagine it was practically brand new seeing it was probably used only for a trainer. He uses it as his "deer" rifle. When I accompany him, I bring a box of ammo and use it to put soda cans into low earth orbit. man, that's an awful expensive plinker. I bought a few boxes of 6.55 a couple of years ago at a gun show for about 75 cents a round...$15 a box or so. Good ammo, too...Remington. I might still have a box around somewhere. I much prefer .22LR for fun shooting...cheap, less noisy, accurate at the distances I prefer to shoot. |
Clubs open their books for Justhate, Jackoff, Bar, Krueger,Herring, et al
On Aug 15, 8:18*am, H the K wrote
If I had a place to shoot those 400 meter shots, though, I'd be using a bolt action rifle, not a garand or one of its successors. That's always been a standing arguement if a bolt action is more accurate than automatic. I myself say "6 one way 1/2 a dozen the other" The arguement I hear is that the action of the bolt opening upon firing throws the barrel off target. But the only fallacy to that theory is that the trajectory is far gone before the bolt considers opening. A friend of mine has a National Match Garrand and a Springfield Armory reworked '03-A3 and with bench rest, he holds consistently tight groups with both, in so much that you cant tell the difference in the accuracy of either. |
Clubs open their books for Justhate, Jackoff, Bar, Krueger,Herring, et al
Tim wrote:
On Aug 15, 8:18 am, H the K wrote If I had a place to shoot those 400 meter shots, though, I'd be using a bolt action rifle, not a garand or one of its successors. That's always been a standing arguement if a bolt action is more accurate than automatic. I myself say "6 one way 1/2 a dozen the other" The arguement I hear is that the action of the bolt opening upon firing throws the barrel off target. But the only fallacy to that theory is that the trajectory is far gone before the bolt considers opening. A friend of mine has a National Match Garrand and a Springfield Armory reworked '03-A3 and with bench rest, he holds consistently tight groups with both, in so much that you cant tell the difference in the accuracy of either. Well, I just bought a Zombie Killer, aka a rifle in .22LR. I wanted something that would be reasonably accurate right out of the box, so I did not want a Ruger 10/22, aka the "Bayliner" of rifles. Seriously, the Ruger is a fine rifle, very popular, but everyone I know who shoots one seems to spend its price all over again in barrels, actions, stocks, trigger work, and even receivers. I wanted a reasonably price rifle, $500 or less, that would perform properly with my having to rebuild it. I took a look at some CZ's...they make very nice bolt-action rifles in .22LR, sort of "mini-Mausers," if you will. But then I saw someone shooting a rifle I'd not seen or heard of before...a Thompson Center "Classic." I tried one and was astonished that with just the sights on the rifle I was shooting 1/2" to 1" groups at 50 yards after 10 minutes of practice. So I bought one. Mine looks like this: http://www.tcarms.com/firearms/rimfireR55AllWeather.php It's the "Classic," but with a target barrel and composite stock. Shoots great...unbelievable, actually. Got a scope incoming for it, a 6-20x40. Guaranteed to kill zombies at 100 yards, with 1/2" groups! Probably work on The Attack of the LoogyJustWaitaFreaks, too. |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:22 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com