|
Clubs open their books for Justhate, Jackoff, Bar, Krueger,Herring, et al
Tim wrote:
On Aug 14, 5:04 pm, H the K wrote: Calif Bill wrote: "JLH LXV" wrote in message ... On Thu, 13 Aug 2009 19:47:36 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote: On Aug 13, 8:15 pm, H the K wrote: Officials see rise in militia groups across U.S. "The man is holding an AR-15 semiautomatic rifle, and he encourages viewers to buy one." Hey, those are really good rifles to have. very accurate and the action works well, but you gotta keep 'em clean. I think I'd like to take one to Camp Roberts, CA, and spend a day hunting prairie dogs with an AR-15. That would be some kick-ass fun, and help with the prairie dog infestation. -- John H All decisions, even those made by liberals, are the result of binary thinking. No prairie dogs at Roberts. They is ground squirrels and they have had a population explosion everywhere this year. Doubtful herring could hit either a prairie dog or a ground squirrel with that sort of rifle or, in fact, any other kind of firearm, unless the critter was three feet away with its tail tied to a fence post. Well Harry, I think the results would be quite interesting to hand John or Tom a quality M1, or M1-A and go to the 400m range with them. I'm speculating that after maybe one or two windage rounds you wouldn't see "maggie's drawers" again. It's amazing to go to Camp Perry, and observe a few veterans of the Korean war and see what they can still do with an M-1 Garrand. ...very VERY impressive. OS-OK. Additional comment... While I wouldn't stand downrange of anyone firing a weapon, 400 meters is a quarter of a mile. I think herring could fire off rounds all day long on a standard sight miiltary rifle like the ones you've offered up, and if he ever hit a metal pieplate target (the size of a man's head) at that distance, it would be pure coincidence. Unless it were painted orange, I doubt herring could even see such a target, much less sight in the rifle while locking in the target. I've seen his glasses. There aren't many 60+ year old guys around who could use a standard-issue military rifle to bang rounds off a metal pieplate at 400 meters, especially guys who don't shoot regularly. Sorry, your pants are on fire. |
Clubs open their books for Justhate, Jackoff, Bar, Krueger, Herring, et al
On Sat, 15 Aug 2009 08:18:57 -0400, H the K
wrote: Tim wrote: On Aug 14, 5:04 pm, H the K wrote: Calif Bill wrote: "JLH LXV" wrote in message ... On Thu, 13 Aug 2009 19:47:36 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote: On Aug 13, 8:15 pm, H the K wrote: Officials see rise in militia groups across U.S. "The man is holding an AR-15 semiautomatic rifle, and he encourages viewers to buy one." Hey, those are really good rifles to have. very accurate and the action works well, but you gotta keep 'em clean. I think I'd like to take one to Camp Roberts, CA, and spend a day hunting prairie dogs with an AR-15. That would be some kick-ass fun, and help with the prairie dog infestation. -- John H All decisions, even those made by liberals, are the result of binary thinking. No prairie dogs at Roberts. They is ground squirrels and they have had a population explosion everywhere this year. Doubtful herring could hit either a prairie dog or a ground squirrel with that sort of rifle or, in fact, any other kind of firearm, unless the critter was three feet away with its tail tied to a fence post. Well Harry, I think the results would be quite interesting to hand John or Tom a quality M1, or M1-A and go to the 400m range with them. I'm speculating that after maybe one or two windage rounds you wouldn't see "maggie's drawers" again. It's amazing to go to Camp Perry, and observe a few veterans of the Korean war and see what they can still do with an M-1 Garrand. ...very VERY impressive. OS-OK. Additional comment... While I wouldn't stand downrange of anyone firing a weapon, 400 meters is a quarter of a mile. I think herring could fire off rounds all day long on a standard sight miiltary rifle like the ones you've offered up, and if he ever hit a metal pieplate target (the size of a man's head) at that distance, it would be pure coincidence. Unless it were painted orange, I doubt herring could even see such a target, much less sight in the rifle while locking in the target. I've seen his glasses. There aren't many 60+ year old guys around who could use a standard-issue military rifle to bang rounds off a metal pieplate at 400 meters, especially guys who don't shoot regularly. Sorry, your pants are on fire. Following a golf ball 300 yards is a real bitch too. You're a joke, Harry. Pretend not to see this. -- John H All decisions, even those made by liberals, are the result of binary thinking. |
Clubs open their books for Justhate, Jackoff, Bar, Krueger,Herring, et al
On Aug 15, 7:18*am, H the K wrote:
Tim wrote: On Aug 14, 5:04 pm, H the K wrote: Calif Bill wrote: "JLH LXV" wrote in message ... On Thu, 13 Aug 2009 19:47:36 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote: On Aug 13, 8:15 pm, H the K wrote: Officials see rise in militia groups across U.S. "The man is holding an AR-15 semiautomatic rifle, and he encourages viewers to buy one." Hey, those are really good rifles to have. very accurate and the action works well, but you gotta keep 'em clean. I think I'd like to take one to Camp Roberts, CA, and spend a day hunting prairie dogs with an AR-15. That would be some kick-ass fun, and help with the prairie dog infestation. -- John H All decisions, even those made by liberals, are the result of binary thinking. No prairie dogs at Roberts. *They is ground squirrels and they have had a population explosion everywhere this year. Doubtful herring could hit either a prairie dog or a ground squirrel with that sort of rifle or, in fact, any other kind of firearm, unless the critter was three feet away with its tail tied to a fence post. Well Harry, I think the results *would be quite interesting to hand John or Tom a quality M1, or M1-A and go to the 400m range with them. I'm speculating that after maybe one or two windage rounds you wouldn't see "maggie's drawers" again. It's amazing to go to Camp Perry, and observe a *few veterans of the Korean war *and see what they can still do with an M-1 Garrand. *...very VERY impressive. OS-OK. Additional comment... While I wouldn't stand downrange of anyone firing a weapon, 400 meters is a quarter of a mile. I think herring could fire off rounds all day long on a standard sight miiltary rifle like the ones you've offered up, and if he ever hit a metal pieplate target (the size of a man's head) at that distance, it would be pure coincidence. Unless it were painted orange, I doubt herring could even see such a target, much less sight in the rifle while locking in the target. I've seen his glasses. There aren't many 60+ year old guys around who could use a standard-issue military rifle to bang rounds off a metal pieplate at 400 meters, especially guys who don't shoot regularly. Sorry, your pants are on fire. I wasn't talking about pie plates, Harry. |
Clubs open their books for Justhate, Jackoff, Bar, Krueger,Herring, et al
Tim wrote:
On Aug 15, 7:18 am, H the K wrote: Tim wrote: On Aug 14, 5:04 pm, H the K wrote: Calif Bill wrote: "JLH LXV" wrote in message ... On Thu, 13 Aug 2009 19:47:36 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote: On Aug 13, 8:15 pm, H the K wrote: Officials see rise in militia groups across U.S. "The man is holding an AR-15 semiautomatic rifle, and he encourages viewers to buy one." Hey, those are really good rifles to have. very accurate and the action works well, but you gotta keep 'em clean. I think I'd like to take one to Camp Roberts, CA, and spend a day hunting prairie dogs with an AR-15. That would be some kick-ass fun, and help with the prairie dog infestation. -- John H All decisions, even those made by liberals, are the result of binary thinking. No prairie dogs at Roberts. They is ground squirrels and they have had a population explosion everywhere this year. Doubtful herring could hit either a prairie dog or a ground squirrel with that sort of rifle or, in fact, any other kind of firearm, unless the critter was three feet away with its tail tied to a fence post. Well Harry, I think the results would be quite interesting to hand John or Tom a quality M1, or M1-A and go to the 400m range with them. I'm speculating that after maybe one or two windage rounds you wouldn't see "maggie's drawers" again. It's amazing to go to Camp Perry, and observe a few veterans of the Korean war and see what they can still do with an M-1 Garrand. ...very VERY impressive. OS-OK. Additional comment... While I wouldn't stand downrange of anyone firing a weapon, 400 meters is a quarter of a mile. I think herring could fire off rounds all day long on a standard sight miiltary rifle like the ones you've offered up, and if he ever hit a metal pieplate target (the size of a man's head) at that distance, it would be pure coincidence. Unless it were painted orange, I doubt herring could even see such a target, much less sight in the rifle while locking in the target. I've seen his glasses. There aren't many 60+ year old guys around who could use a standard-issue military rifle to bang rounds off a metal pieplate at 400 meters, especially guys who don't shoot regularly. Sorry, your pants are on fire. I wasn't talking about pie plates, Harry. Well, that's my point of reference for bare metal sights and 100-yard and plus rifle shooting...8" paper targets mounted on cardboard *or* preferably 8" steel pieplates. I suppose if you set up a target the size of a car at 400 meters, it would be a mite easier. Or a barn. My comments about herring stand, though, and I'd double-down on that, knowing he probably hasn't shot a rifle regularly in many years. I have 20/20 and 20/30 eyesight, but if I am shooting long range via typical metal sights, I have a pair of shooting glasses I use that put the target a bit out of the sharpest zone but let me see bare metal sights properly. That's usually enough for me to hit the pieplate at long distances. I've never shot targets at 400 meters. I shoot at "combat" and target distances, usually seven, fifteen, twenty five, fifty and one hundred yards. If I had a place to shoot those 400 meter shots, though, I'd be using a bolt action rifle, not a garand or one of its successors. I have a buddy with a Gustav Mauser CG 68 that I've shot a few times and it seems pretty accurate, though I have no idea what it would do at 400 meters. |
Clubs open their books for Justhate, Jackoff, Bar, Krueger,Herring, et al
On Aug 15, 8:18*am, H the K wrote:
Tim wrote: On Aug 15, 7:18 am, H the K wrote: Tim wrote: On Aug 14, 5:04 pm, H the K wrote: Calif Bill wrote: "JLH LXV" wrote in message om... On Thu, 13 Aug 2009 19:47:36 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote: On Aug 13, 8:15 pm, H the K wrote: Officials see rise in militia groups across U.S. "The man is holding an AR-15 semiautomatic rifle, and he encourages viewers to buy one." Hey, those are really good rifles to have. very accurate and the action works well, but you gotta keep 'em clean. I think I'd like to take one to Camp Roberts, CA, and spend a day hunting prairie dogs with an AR-15. That would be some kick-ass fun, and help with the prairie dog infestation. -- John H All decisions, even those made by liberals, are the result of binary thinking. No prairie dogs at Roberts. *They is ground squirrels and they have had a population explosion everywhere this year. Doubtful herring could hit either a prairie dog or a ground squirrel with that sort of rifle or, in fact, any other kind of firearm, unless the critter was three feet away with its tail tied to a fence post. Well Harry, I think the results *would be quite interesting to hand John or Tom a quality M1, or M1-A and go to the 400m range with them. I'm speculating that after maybe one or two windage rounds you wouldn't see "maggie's drawers" again. It's amazing to go to Camp Perry, and observe a *few veterans of the Korean war *and see what they can still do with an M-1 Garrand. *...very VERY impressive. OS-OK. Additional comment... While I wouldn't stand downrange of anyone firing a weapon, 400 meters is a quarter of a mile. I think herring could fire off rounds all day long on a standard sight miiltary rifle like the ones you've offered up, and if he ever hit a metal pieplate target (the size of a man's head) at that distance, it would be pure coincidence. Unless it were painted orange, I doubt herring could even see such a target, much less sight in the rifle while locking in the target. I've seen his glasses. There aren't many 60+ year old guys around who could use a standard-issue military rifle to bang rounds off a metal pieplate at 400 meters, especially guys who don't shoot regularly. Sorry, your pants are on fire. I wasn't talking about pie plates, Harry. Well, that's my point of reference for bare metal sights and 100-yard and plus rifle shooting...8" paper targets mounted on cardboard *or* preferably 8" steel pieplates. I suppose if you set up a target the size of a car at 400 meters, it would be a mite easier. Or a barn. My comments about herring stand, though, and I'd double-down on that, knowing he probably hasn't shot a rifle regularly in many years. I have 20/20 and 20/30 eyesight, but if I am shooting long range via typical metal sights, I have a pair of shooting glasses I use that put the target a bit out of the sharpest zone but let me see bare metal sights properly. That's usually enough for me to hit the pieplate at long distances. I've never shot targets at 400 meters. I shoot at "combat" and target distances, usually seven, fifteen, twenty five, fifty and one hundred yards. If I had a place to shoot those 400 meter shots, though, I'd be using a bolt action rifle, not a garand or one of its successors. I have a buddy with a Gustav Mauser CG 68 that I've shot a few times and it seems pretty accurate, though I have no idea what it would do at 400 meters. 6.5x55 swede's are pretty good stuff. Especially that Husquavarna your friend has. I have a Ljungman in the same caliber. The sight range is up to 700m, which doesn't necessarily mean you'll hit anything at that distance, but you might get lucky. http://mauser98.com/ljungmanbench.jpg The Swedes are like the Swiss. they built high quality fire arms and never really needed to use them. |
Clubs open their books for Justhate, Jackoff, Bar, Krueger,Herring, et al
Tim wrote:
On Aug 15, 8:18 am, H the K wrote: Tim wrote: On Aug 15, 7:18 am, H the K wrote: Tim wrote: On Aug 14, 5:04 pm, H the K wrote: Calif Bill wrote: "JLH LXV" wrote in message ... On Thu, 13 Aug 2009 19:47:36 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote: On Aug 13, 8:15 pm, H the K wrote: Officials see rise in militia groups across U.S. "The man is holding an AR-15 semiautomatic rifle, and he encourages viewers to buy one." Hey, those are really good rifles to have. very accurate and the action works well, but you gotta keep 'em clean. I think I'd like to take one to Camp Roberts, CA, and spend a day hunting prairie dogs with an AR-15. That would be some kick-ass fun, and help with the prairie dog infestation. -- John H All decisions, even those made by liberals, are the result of binary thinking. No prairie dogs at Roberts. They is ground squirrels and they have had a population explosion everywhere this year. Doubtful herring could hit either a prairie dog or a ground squirrel with that sort of rifle or, in fact, any other kind of firearm, unless the critter was three feet away with its tail tied to a fence post. Well Harry, I think the results would be quite interesting to hand John or Tom a quality M1, or M1-A and go to the 400m range with them. I'm speculating that after maybe one or two windage rounds you wouldn't see "maggie's drawers" again. It's amazing to go to Camp Perry, and observe a few veterans of the Korean war and see what they can still do with an M-1 Garrand. ...very VERY impressive. OS-OK. Additional comment... While I wouldn't stand downrange of anyone firing a weapon, 400 meters is a quarter of a mile. I think herring could fire off rounds all day long on a standard sight miiltary rifle like the ones you've offered up, and if he ever hit a metal pieplate target (the size of a man's head) at that distance, it would be pure coincidence. Unless it were painted orange, I doubt herring could even see such a target, much less sight in the rifle while locking in the target. I've seen his glasses. There aren't many 60+ year old guys around who could use a standard-issue military rifle to bang rounds off a metal pieplate at 400 meters, especially guys who don't shoot regularly. Sorry, your pants are on fire. I wasn't talking about pie plates, Harry. Well, that's my point of reference for bare metal sights and 100-yard and plus rifle shooting...8" paper targets mounted on cardboard *or* preferably 8" steel pieplates. I suppose if you set up a target the size of a car at 400 meters, it would be a mite easier. Or a barn. My comments about herring stand, though, and I'd double-down on that, knowing he probably hasn't shot a rifle regularly in many years. I have 20/20 and 20/30 eyesight, but if I am shooting long range via typical metal sights, I have a pair of shooting glasses I use that put the target a bit out of the sharpest zone but let me see bare metal sights properly. That's usually enough for me to hit the pieplate at long distances. I've never shot targets at 400 meters. I shoot at "combat" and target distances, usually seven, fifteen, twenty five, fifty and one hundred yards. If I had a place to shoot those 400 meter shots, though, I'd be using a bolt action rifle, not a garand or one of its successors. I have a buddy with a Gustav Mauser CG 68 that I've shot a few times and it seems pretty accurate, though I have no idea what it would do at 400 meters. 6.5x55 swede's are pretty good stuff. Especially that Husquavarna your friend has. I have a Ljungman in the same caliber. The sight range is up to 700m, which doesn't necessarily mean you'll hit anything at that distance, but you might get lucky. http://mauser98.com/ljungmanbench.jpg The Swedes are like the Swiss. they built high quality fire arms and never really needed to use them. Bought any 6.55 ammo lately? Holy tamale. My buddy bought his at a Virginia pawn shop, and practically stole it, since all the numbers match, it had a full accessory kit, and looked damned close to unfired. He made an attempt to trace its history, but I don't think he had much success. He uses it as his "deer" rifle. When I accompany him, I bring a box of ammo and use it to put soda cans into low earth orbit. |
Clubs open their books for Justhate, Jackoff, Bar, Krueger,Herring, et al
On Aug 15, 2:05*pm, H the K wrote:
Tim wrote: On Aug 15, 8:18 am, H the K wrote: Tim wrote: On Aug 15, 7:18 am, H the K wrote: Tim wrote: On Aug 14, 5:04 pm, H the K wrote: Calif Bill wrote: "JLH LXV" wrote in message news:e6ga85thoa1vi0k5ta4cr0713jqnp1ucvj@4ax .com... On Thu, 13 Aug 2009 19:47:36 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote: On Aug 13, 8:15 pm, H the K wrote: Officials see rise in militia groups across U.S. "The man is holding an AR-15 semiautomatic rifle, and he encourages viewers to buy one." Hey, those are really good rifles to have. very accurate and the action works well, but you gotta keep 'em clean. I think I'd like to take one to Camp Roberts, CA, and spend a day hunting prairie dogs with an AR-15. That would be some kick-ass fun, and help with the prairie dog infestation. -- John H All decisions, even those made by liberals, are the result of binary thinking. No prairie dogs at Roberts. *They is ground squirrels and they have had a population explosion everywhere this year. Doubtful herring could hit either a prairie dog or a ground squirrel with that sort of rifle or, in fact, any other kind of firearm, unless the critter was three feet away with its tail tied to a fence post.. Well Harry, I think the results *would be quite interesting to hand John or Tom a quality M1, or M1-A and go to the 400m range with them. I'm speculating that after maybe one or two windage rounds you wouldn't see "maggie's drawers" again. It's amazing to go to Camp Perry, and observe a *few veterans of the Korean war *and see what they can still do with an M-1 Garrand. *...very VERY impressive. OS-OK. Additional comment... While I wouldn't stand downrange of anyone firing a weapon, 400 meters is a quarter of a mile. I think herring could fire off rounds all day long on a standard sight miiltary rifle like the ones you've offered up, and if he ever hit a metal pieplate target (the size of a man's head) at that distance, it would be pure coincidence. Unless it were painted orange, I doubt herring could even see such a target, much less sight in the rifle while locking in the target. I've seen his glasses. There aren't many 60+ year old guys around who could use a standard-issue military rifle to bang rounds off a metal pieplate at 400 meters, especially guys who don't shoot regularly. Sorry, your pants are on fire. I wasn't talking about pie plates, Harry. Well, that's my point of reference for bare metal sights and 100-yard and plus rifle shooting...8" paper targets mounted on cardboard *or* preferably 8" steel pieplates. I suppose if you set up a target the size of a car at 400 meters, it would be a mite easier. Or a barn. My comments about herring stand, though, and I'd double-down on that, knowing he probably hasn't shot a rifle regularly in many years. I have 20/20 and 20/30 eyesight, but if I am shooting long range via typical metal sights, I have a pair of shooting glasses I use that put the target a bit out of the sharpest zone but let me see bare metal sights properly. That's usually enough for me to hit the pieplate at long distances. I've never shot targets at 400 meters. I shoot at "combat" and target distances, usually seven, fifteen, twenty five, fifty and one hundred yards. If I had a place to shoot those 400 meter shots, though, I'd be using a bolt action rifle, not a garand or one of its successors. I have a buddy with a Gustav Mauser CG 68 that I've shot a few times and it seems pretty accurate, though I have no idea what it would do at 400 meters. 6.5x55 swede's are pretty good stuff. Especially that Husquavarna your friend has. I have a Ljungman in the same caliber. The sight range is up to 700m, which doesn't necessarily mean you'll hit anything at that distance, but you might get lucky. http://mauser98.com/ljungmanbench.jpg The Swedes are like the Swiss. they built high quality fire arms and never really *needed to use them. Bought any 6.55 ammo lately? Holy tamale. My buddy bought his at a Virginia pawn shop, and practically stole it, since all the numbers match, it had a full accessory kit, and looked damned close to unfired. He made an attempt to trace its history, but I don't think he had much success. No I haven't I bought But I bought 700 rds about 15 yr.s ago in unissued Military ball 1953, But I can imagine tht the rices have gone way up! I imagine it was practically brand new seeing it was probably used only for a trainer. He uses it as his "deer" rifle. When I accompany him, I bring a box of ammo and use it to put soda cans into low earth orbit. man, that's an awful expensive plinker. |
Clubs open their books for Justhate, Jackoff, Bar, Krueger,Herring, et al
Tim wrote:
On Aug 15, 2:05 pm, H the K wrote: Tim wrote: On Aug 15, 8:18 am, H the K wrote: Tim wrote: On Aug 15, 7:18 am, H the K wrote: Tim wrote: On Aug 14, 5:04 pm, H the K wrote: Calif Bill wrote: "JLH LXV" wrote in message ... On Thu, 13 Aug 2009 19:47:36 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote: On Aug 13, 8:15 pm, H the K wrote: Officials see rise in militia groups across U.S. "The man is holding an AR-15 semiautomatic rifle, and he encourages viewers to buy one." Hey, those are really good rifles to have. very accurate and the action works well, but you gotta keep 'em clean. I think I'd like to take one to Camp Roberts, CA, and spend a day hunting prairie dogs with an AR-15. That would be some kick-ass fun, and help with the prairie dog infestation. -- John H All decisions, even those made by liberals, are the result of binary thinking. No prairie dogs at Roberts. They is ground squirrels and they have had a population explosion everywhere this year. Doubtful herring could hit either a prairie dog or a ground squirrel with that sort of rifle or, in fact, any other kind of firearm, unless the critter was three feet away with its tail tied to a fence post. Well Harry, I think the results would be quite interesting to hand John or Tom a quality M1, or M1-A and go to the 400m range with them. I'm speculating that after maybe one or two windage rounds you wouldn't see "maggie's drawers" again. It's amazing to go to Camp Perry, and observe a few veterans of the Korean war and see what they can still do with an M-1 Garrand. ...very VERY impressive. OS-OK. Additional comment... While I wouldn't stand downrange of anyone firing a weapon, 400 meters is a quarter of a mile. I think herring could fire off rounds all day long on a standard sight miiltary rifle like the ones you've offered up, and if he ever hit a metal pieplate target (the size of a man's head) at that distance, it would be pure coincidence. Unless it were painted orange, I doubt herring could even see such a target, much less sight in the rifle while locking in the target. I've seen his glasses. There aren't many 60+ year old guys around who could use a standard-issue military rifle to bang rounds off a metal pieplate at 400 meters, especially guys who don't shoot regularly. Sorry, your pants are on fire. I wasn't talking about pie plates, Harry. Well, that's my point of reference for bare metal sights and 100-yard and plus rifle shooting...8" paper targets mounted on cardboard *or* preferably 8" steel pieplates. I suppose if you set up a target the size of a car at 400 meters, it would be a mite easier. Or a barn. My comments about herring stand, though, and I'd double-down on that, knowing he probably hasn't shot a rifle regularly in many years. I have 20/20 and 20/30 eyesight, but if I am shooting long range via typical metal sights, I have a pair of shooting glasses I use that put the target a bit out of the sharpest zone but let me see bare metal sights properly. That's usually enough for me to hit the pieplate at long distances. I've never shot targets at 400 meters. I shoot at "combat" and target distances, usually seven, fifteen, twenty five, fifty and one hundred yards. If I had a place to shoot those 400 meter shots, though, I'd be using a bolt action rifle, not a garand or one of its successors. I have a buddy with a Gustav Mauser CG 68 that I've shot a few times and it seems pretty accurate, though I have no idea what it would do at 400 meters. 6.5x55 swede's are pretty good stuff. Especially that Husquavarna your friend has. I have a Ljungman in the same caliber. The sight range is up to 700m, which doesn't necessarily mean you'll hit anything at that distance, but you might get lucky. http://mauser98.com/ljungmanbench.jpg The Swedes are like the Swiss. they built high quality fire arms and never really needed to use them. Bought any 6.55 ammo lately? Holy tamale. My buddy bought his at a Virginia pawn shop, and practically stole it, since all the numbers match, it had a full accessory kit, and looked damned close to unfired. He made an attempt to trace its history, but I don't think he had much success. No I haven't I bought But I bought 700 rds about 15 yr.s ago in unissued Military ball 1953, But I can imagine tht the rices have gone way up! I imagine it was practically brand new seeing it was probably used only for a trainer. He uses it as his "deer" rifle. When I accompany him, I bring a box of ammo and use it to put soda cans into low earth orbit. man, that's an awful expensive plinker. I bought a few boxes of 6.55 a couple of years ago at a gun show for about 75 cents a round...$15 a box or so. Good ammo, too...Remington. I might still have a box around somewhere. I much prefer .22LR for fun shooting...cheap, less noisy, accurate at the distances I prefer to shoot. |
Clubs open their books for Justhate, Jackoff, Bar, Krueger,Herring, et al
On Aug 15, 8:18*am, H the K wrote
If I had a place to shoot those 400 meter shots, though, I'd be using a bolt action rifle, not a garand or one of its successors. That's always been a standing arguement if a bolt action is more accurate than automatic. I myself say "6 one way 1/2 a dozen the other" The arguement I hear is that the action of the bolt opening upon firing throws the barrel off target. But the only fallacy to that theory is that the trajectory is far gone before the bolt considers opening. A friend of mine has a National Match Garrand and a Springfield Armory reworked '03-A3 and with bench rest, he holds consistently tight groups with both, in so much that you cant tell the difference in the accuracy of either. |
Clubs open their books for Justhate, Jackoff, Bar, Krueger,Herring, et al
Tim wrote:
On Aug 15, 8:18 am, H the K wrote If I had a place to shoot those 400 meter shots, though, I'd be using a bolt action rifle, not a garand or one of its successors. That's always been a standing arguement if a bolt action is more accurate than automatic. I myself say "6 one way 1/2 a dozen the other" The arguement I hear is that the action of the bolt opening upon firing throws the barrel off target. But the only fallacy to that theory is that the trajectory is far gone before the bolt considers opening. A friend of mine has a National Match Garrand and a Springfield Armory reworked '03-A3 and with bench rest, he holds consistently tight groups with both, in so much that you cant tell the difference in the accuracy of either. Well, I just bought a Zombie Killer, aka a rifle in .22LR. I wanted something that would be reasonably accurate right out of the box, so I did not want a Ruger 10/22, aka the "Bayliner" of rifles. Seriously, the Ruger is a fine rifle, very popular, but everyone I know who shoots one seems to spend its price all over again in barrels, actions, stocks, trigger work, and even receivers. I wanted a reasonably price rifle, $500 or less, that would perform properly with my having to rebuild it. I took a look at some CZ's...they make very nice bolt-action rifles in .22LR, sort of "mini-Mausers," if you will. But then I saw someone shooting a rifle I'd not seen or heard of before...a Thompson Center "Classic." I tried one and was astonished that with just the sights on the rifle I was shooting 1/2" to 1" groups at 50 yards after 10 minutes of practice. So I bought one. Mine looks like this: http://www.tcarms.com/firearms/rimfireR55AllWeather.php It's the "Classic," but with a target barrel and composite stock. Shoots great...unbelievable, actually. Got a scope incoming for it, a 6-20x40. Guaranteed to kill zombies at 100 yards, with 1/2" groups! Probably work on The Attack of the LoogyJustWaitaFreaks, too. |
Clubs open their books for Justhate, Jackoff, Bar, Krueger,Herring, et al
Don White wrote:
"H the K" wrote in message m... Don White wrote: "H the K" wrote in message ... Calif Bill wrote: "JLH LXV" wrote in message ... On Thu, 13 Aug 2009 19:47:36 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote: On Aug 13, 8:15 pm, H the K wrote: Officials see rise in militia groups across U.S. "The man is holding an AR-15 semiautomatic rifle, and he encourages viewers to buy one." Hey, those are really good rifles to have. very accurate and the action works well, but you gotta keep 'em clean. I think I'd like to take one to Camp Roberts, CA, and spend a day hunting prairie dogs with an AR-15. That would be some kick-ass fun, and help with the prairie dog infestation. -- John H All decisions, even those made by liberals, are the result of binary thinking. No prairie dogs at Roberts. They is ground squirrels and they have had a population explosion everywhere this year. Doubtful herring could hit either a prairie dog or a ground squirrel with that sort of rifle or, in fact, any other kind of firearm, unless the critter was three feet away with its tail tied to a fence post. One wonders why herring would want to spend up a day shooting up critters that have never done him any harm. "Kick-ass fun" for the cruel and heartless maybe. Oh, wait...it's herring. Perhaps while herring is on his motorcycle trip, a few somewhat larger critters might be out for a day of fun and play dodge ball, with our boy herring as the ball. Now *that* would be kick-ass fun. I'd imagine our Johnny would have trouble hitting a barn door at a couple hundred feet. Maybe with his motorcycle... ~~ Snerk ~~ That's the best you can do, dummy? |
Clubs open their books for Justhate, Jackoff, Bar, Krueger,Herring, et al
H the K wrote:
Tim wrote: On Aug 15, 8:18 am, H the K wrote If I had a place to shoot those 400 meter shots, though, I'd be using a bolt action rifle, not a garand or one of its successors. That's always been a standing arguement if a bolt action is more accurate than automatic. I myself say "6 one way 1/2 a dozen the other" The arguement I hear is that the action of the bolt opening upon firing throws the barrel off target. But the only fallacy to that theory is that the trajectory is far gone before the bolt considers opening. A friend of mine has a National Match Garrand and a Springfield Armory reworked '03-A3 and with bench rest, he holds consistently tight groups with both, in so much that you cant tell the difference in the accuracy of either. Well, I just bought a Zombie Killer, aka a rifle in .22LR. I wanted something that would be reasonably accurate right out of the box, so I did not want a Ruger 10/22, aka the "Bayliner" of rifles. Seriously, the Ruger is a fine rifle, very popular, but everyone I know who shoots one seems to spend its price all over again in barrels, actions, stocks, trigger work, and even receivers. I wanted a reasonably price rifle, $500 or less, that would perform properly with my having to rebuild it. I took a look at some CZ's...they make very nice bolt-action rifles in .22LR, sort of "mini-Mausers," if you will. But then I saw someone shooting a rifle I'd not seen or heard of before...a Thompson Center "Classic." I tried one and was astonished that with just the sights on the rifle I was shooting 1/2" to 1" groups at 50 yards after 10 minutes of practice. So I bought one. Mine looks like this: http://www.tcarms.com/firearms/rimfireR55AllWeather.php It's the "Classic," but with a target barrel and composite stock. Shoots great...unbelievable, actually. Got a scope incoming for it, a 6-20x40. Guaranteed to kill zombies at 100 yards, with 1/2" groups! Probably work on The Attack of the LoogyJustWaitaFreaks, too. The Ruger 10/22 is a proven, reliable rifle. The upgrades your "friends" buy have ZERO to do with it's out-of-the-box accuracy and performance. If it did, they would have never bought one. Good luck with your tc. My bet is you Googled it rather than buying it. |
Clubs open their books for Justhate, Jackoff, Bar, Krueger, Herring, et al
"D 1" wrote in message ... Don White wrote: "H the K" wrote in message m... Don White wrote: "H the K" wrote in message ... Calif Bill wrote: "JLH LXV" wrote in message ... On Thu, 13 Aug 2009 19:47:36 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote: On Aug 13, 8:15 pm, H the K wrote: Officials see rise in militia groups across U.S. "The man is holding an AR-15 semiautomatic rifle, and he encourages viewers to buy one." Hey, those are really good rifles to have. very accurate and the action works well, but you gotta keep 'em clean. I think I'd like to take one to Camp Roberts, CA, and spend a day hunting prairie dogs with an AR-15. That would be some kick-ass fun, and help with the prairie dog infestation. -- John H All decisions, even those made by liberals, are the result of binary thinking. No prairie dogs at Roberts. They is ground squirrels and they have had a population explosion everywhere this year. Doubtful herring could hit either a prairie dog or a ground squirrel with that sort of rifle or, in fact, any other kind of firearm, unless the critter was three feet away with its tail tied to a fence post. One wonders why herring would want to spend up a day shooting up critters that have never done him any harm. "Kick-ass fun" for the cruel and heartless maybe. Oh, wait...it's herring. Perhaps while herring is on his motorcycle trip, a few somewhat larger critters might be out for a day of fun and play dodge ball, with our boy herring as the ball. Now *that* would be kick-ass fun. I'd imagine our Johnny would have trouble hitting a barn door at a couple hundred feet. Maybe with his motorcycle... ~~ Snerk ~~ That's the best you can do, dummy? That might be a good question for your pappy. |
Clubs open their books for Justhate, Jackoff, Bar, Krueger,Herring, et al
Don White wrote:
"D 1" wrote in message ... Don White wrote: "H the K" wrote in message m... Don White wrote: "H the K" wrote in message ... Calif Bill wrote: "JLH LXV" wrote in message ... On Thu, 13 Aug 2009 19:47:36 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote: On Aug 13, 8:15 pm, H the K wrote: Officials see rise in militia groups across U.S. "The man is holding an AR-15 semiautomatic rifle, and he encourages viewers to buy one." Hey, those are really good rifles to have. very accurate and the action works well, but you gotta keep 'em clean. I think I'd like to take one to Camp Roberts, CA, and spend a day hunting prairie dogs with an AR-15. That would be some kick-ass fun, and help with the prairie dog infestation. -- John H All decisions, even those made by liberals, are the result of binary thinking. No prairie dogs at Roberts. They is ground squirrels and they have had a population explosion everywhere this year. Doubtful herring could hit either a prairie dog or a ground squirrel with that sort of rifle or, in fact, any other kind of firearm, unless the critter was three feet away with its tail tied to a fence post. One wonders why herring would want to spend up a day shooting up critters that have never done him any harm. "Kick-ass fun" for the cruel and heartless maybe. Oh, wait...it's herring. Perhaps while herring is on his motorcycle trip, a few somewhat larger critters might be out for a day of fun and play dodge ball, with our boy herring as the ball. Now *that* would be kick-ass fun. I'd imagine our Johnny would have trouble hitting a barn door at a couple hundred feet. Maybe with his motorcycle... ~~ Snerk ~~ That's the best you can do, dummy? That might be a good question for your pappy. Doubt if he knows the guy. |
Clubs open their books for Justhate, Jackoff, Bar, Krueger, Herring, et al
"H the K" wrote in message m... Don White wrote: "D 1" wrote in message ... Don White wrote: "H the K" wrote in message m... Don White wrote: "H the K" wrote in message ... Calif Bill wrote: "JLH LXV" wrote in message ... On Thu, 13 Aug 2009 19:47:36 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote: On Aug 13, 8:15 pm, H the K wrote: Officials see rise in militia groups across U.S. "The man is holding an AR-15 semiautomatic rifle, and he encourages viewers to buy one." Hey, those are really good rifles to have. very accurate and the action works well, but you gotta keep 'em clean. I think I'd like to take one to Camp Roberts, CA, and spend a day hunting prairie dogs with an AR-15. That would be some kick-ass fun, and help with the prairie dog infestation. -- John H All decisions, even those made by liberals, are the result of binary thinking. No prairie dogs at Roberts. They is ground squirrels and they have had a population explosion everywhere this year. Doubtful herring could hit either a prairie dog or a ground squirrel with that sort of rifle or, in fact, any other kind of firearm, unless the critter was three feet away with its tail tied to a fence post. One wonders why herring would want to spend up a day shooting up critters that have never done him any harm. "Kick-ass fun" for the cruel and heartless maybe. Oh, wait...it's herring. Perhaps while herring is on his motorcycle trip, a few somewhat larger critters might be out for a day of fun and play dodge ball, with our boy herring as the ball. Now *that* would be kick-ass fun. I'd imagine our Johnny would have trouble hitting a barn door at a couple hundred feet. Maybe with his motorcycle... ~~ Snerk ~~ That's the best you can do, dummy? That might be a good question for your pappy. Doubt if he knows the guy. ...and if the pappy found out how Dingy has evolved...he probably wouldn't want to know him either. |
Clubs open their books for Justhate, Jackoff, Bar, Krueger, Herring, et al
On Sat, 15 Aug 2009 23:23:35 -0300, "Don White"
wrote: "D 1" wrote in message m... Don White wrote: "H the K" wrote in message m... Don White wrote: "H the K" wrote in message ... Calif Bill wrote: "JLH LXV" wrote in message ... On Thu, 13 Aug 2009 19:47:36 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote: On Aug 13, 8:15 pm, H the K wrote: Officials see rise in militia groups across U.S. "The man is holding an AR-15 semiautomatic rifle, and he encourages viewers to buy one." Hey, those are really good rifles to have. very accurate and the action works well, but you gotta keep 'em clean. I think I'd like to take one to Camp Roberts, CA, and spend a day hunting prairie dogs with an AR-15. That would be some kick-ass fun, and help with the prairie dog infestation. -- John H All decisions, even those made by liberals, are the result of binary thinking. No prairie dogs at Roberts. They is ground squirrels and they have had a population explosion everywhere this year. Doubtful herring could hit either a prairie dog or a ground squirrel with that sort of rifle or, in fact, any other kind of firearm, unless the critter was three feet away with its tail tied to a fence post. One wonders why herring would want to spend up a day shooting up critters that have never done him any harm. "Kick-ass fun" for the cruel and heartless maybe. Oh, wait...it's herring. Perhaps while herring is on his motorcycle trip, a few somewhat larger critters might be out for a day of fun and play dodge ball, with our boy herring as the ball. Now *that* would be kick-ass fun. I'd imagine our Johnny would have trouble hitting a barn door at a couple hundred feet. Maybe with his motorcycle... ~~ Snerk ~~ That's the best you can do, dummy? That might be a good question for your pappy. How's your mom, Donnie? Does she know how you spend your time? |
Clubs open their books for Justhate, Jackoff, Bar, Krueger, Herring, et al
On Sat, 15 Aug 2009 12:44:15 -0700 (PDT), Tim
wrote: man, that's an awful expensive plinker. Some plink with a .50 machine gun. I bought a Barrett 50 for plinking. Bullets were lathe turned brass. Cost a buck a round. Casady |
Clubs open their books for Justhate, Jackoff, Bar, Krueger,Herring, et al
Richard Casady wrote:
On Sat, 15 Aug 2009 12:44:15 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote: man, that's an awful expensive plinker. Some plink with a .50 machine gun. I bought a Barrett 50 for plinking. Bullets were lathe turned brass. Cost a buck a round. Casady A buck a round, eh? Now that would be a hell of a price, these days. More like $4.00 a round. What were you "plinking," scrapped cars? |
Clubs open their books for Justhate, Jackoff, Bar, Krueger, Herring, et al
On Sun, 16 Aug 2009 11:22:31 -0400, H the K
wrote: Richard Casady wrote: On Sat, 15 Aug 2009 12:44:15 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote: man, that's an awful expensive plinker. Some plink with a .50 machine gun. I bought a Barrett 50 for plinking. Bullets were lathe turned brass. Cost a buck a round. Casady A buck a round, eh? Now that would be a hell of a price, these days. More like $4.00 a round. What were you "plinking," scrapped cars? A year after Barrett started sellling them, whenever that was. Yes, like any farmer, I had junk cars out behind the barn. Casady |
Clubs open their books for Justhate, Jackoff, Bar, Krueger,Herring, et al
JLH OPAof7 wrote:
On Sat, 15 Aug 2009 23:23:35 -0300, "Don White" wrote: "D 1" wrote in message ... Don White wrote: "H the K" wrote in message m... Don White wrote: "H the K" wrote in message ... Calif Bill wrote: "JLH LXV" wrote in message ... On Thu, 13 Aug 2009 19:47:36 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote: On Aug 13, 8:15 pm, H the K wrote: Officials see rise in militia groups across U.S. "The man is holding an AR-15 semiautomatic rifle, and he encourages viewers to buy one." Hey, those are really good rifles to have. very accurate and the action works well, but you gotta keep 'em clean. I think I'd like to take one to Camp Roberts, CA, and spend a day hunting prairie dogs with an AR-15. That would be some kick-ass fun, and help with the prairie dog infestation. -- John H All decisions, even those made by liberals, are the result of binary thinking. No prairie dogs at Roberts. They is ground squirrels and they have had a population explosion everywhere this year. Doubtful herring could hit either a prairie dog or a ground squirrel with that sort of rifle or, in fact, any other kind of firearm, unless the critter was three feet away with its tail tied to a fence post. One wonders why herring would want to spend up a day shooting up critters that have never done him any harm. "Kick-ass fun" for the cruel and heartless maybe. Oh, wait...it's herring. Perhaps while herring is on his motorcycle trip, a few somewhat larger critters might be out for a day of fun and play dodge ball, with our boy herring as the ball. Now *that* would be kick-ass fun. I'd imagine our Johnny would have trouble hitting a barn door at a couple hundred feet. Maybe with his motorcycle... ~~ Snerk ~~ That's the best you can do, dummy? That might be a good question for your pappy. How's your mom, Donnie? Does she know how you spend your time? I wasn't going to say it. Glad you did, John! |
Clubs open their books for Justhate, Jackoff, Bar, Krueger,Herring, et al
D 1 wrote:
H the K wrote: Tim wrote: On Aug 15, 8:18 am, H the K wrote If I had a place to shoot those 400 meter shots, though, I'd be using a bolt action rifle, not a garand or one of its successors. That's always been a standing arguement if a bolt action is more accurate than automatic. I myself say "6 one way 1/2 a dozen the other" The arguement I hear is that the action of the bolt opening upon firing throws the barrel off target. But the only fallacy to that theory is that the trajectory is far gone before the bolt considers opening. A friend of mine has a National Match Garrand and a Springfield Armory reworked '03-A3 and with bench rest, he holds consistently tight groups with both, in so much that you cant tell the difference in the accuracy of either. Well, I just bought a Zombie Killer, aka a rifle in .22LR. I wanted something that would be reasonably accurate right out of the box, so I did not want a Ruger 10/22, aka the "Bayliner" of rifles. Seriously, the Ruger is a fine rifle, very popular, but everyone I know who shoots one seems to spend its price all over again in barrels, actions, stocks, trigger work, and even receivers. I wanted a reasonably price rifle, $500 or less, that would perform properly with my having to rebuild it. I took a look at some CZ's...they make very nice bolt-action rifles in .22LR, sort of "mini-Mausers," if you will. But then I saw someone shooting a rifle I'd not seen or heard of before...a Thompson Center "Classic." I tried one and was astonished that with just the sights on the rifle I was shooting 1/2" to 1" groups at 50 yards after 10 minutes of practice. So I bought one. Mine looks like this: http://www.tcarms.com/firearms/rimfireR55AllWeather.php It's the "Classic," but with a target barrel and composite stock. Shoots great...unbelievable, actually. Got a scope incoming for it, a 6-20x40. Guaranteed to kill zombies at 100 yards, with 1/2" groups! Probably work on The Attack of the LoogyJustWaitaFreaks, too. The Ruger 10/22 is a proven, reliable rifle. The upgrades your "friends" buy have ZERO to do with it's out-of-the-box accuracy and performance. If it did, they would have never bought one. Good luck with your tc. My bet is you Googled it rather than buying it. I'd take that cap gun and shove it up his ass. |
Clubs open their books for Justhate, Jackoff, Bar, Krueger, Herring, et al
"NotNow" wrote in message ... I'd take that cap gun and shove it up his ass. Hee hee..this from the pantywaisted wimp who hid out in the swamp when Harry swaggered into his city. Lay off that Georgia Golden Bud...it's frying what little brain you have left. |
Clubs open their books for Justhate, Jackoff, Bar, Krueger,Herring, et al
Don White wrote:
"NotNow" wrote in message ... I'd take that cap gun and shove it up his ass. Hee hee..this from the pantywaisted wimp who hid out in the swamp when Harry swaggered into his city. Lay off that Georgia Golden Bud...it's frying what little brain you have left. All the little girls in loogy's neighborhood run when he shows up...they don't want a pair of broken arms, either. |
Clubs open their books for Justhate, Jackoff, Bar, Krueger,Herring, et al
Don White wrote:
"NotNow" wrote in message ... I'd take that cap gun and shove it up his ass. Hee hee..this from the pantywaisted wimp who hid out in the swamp when Harry swaggered into his city. Lay off that Georgia Golden Bud...it's frying what little brain you have left. Donny. I know that Krause needs and appreciates your support, but you've saddled up a dead horse. |
Clubs open their books for Justhate, Jackoff, Bar, Krueger, Herring, et al
|
Clubs open their books for Justhate, Jackoff, Bar, Krueger, Herring, et al
"J i m" wrote in message ... Don White wrote: "NotNow" wrote in message ... I'd take that cap gun and shove it up his ass. Hee hee..this from the pantywaisted wimp who hid out in the swamp when Harry swaggered into his city. Lay off that Georgia Golden Bud...it's frying what little brain you have left. Donny. I know that Krause needs and appreciates your support, but you've saddled up a dead horse. Not so much supporting Harry...but trying to drill some sense into Kevin. |
Clubs open their books for Justhate, Jackoff, Bar, Krueger,Herring, et al
Don White wrote:
"J i m" wrote in message ... Don White wrote: "NotNow" wrote in message ... I'd take that cap gun and shove it up his ass. Hee hee..this from the pantywaisted wimp who hid out in the swamp when Harry swaggered into his city. Lay off that Georgia Golden Bud...it's frying what little brain you have left. Donny. I know that Krause needs and appreciates your support, but you've saddled up a dead horse. Not so much supporting Harry...but trying to drill some sense into Kevin. I didn't read it that way. |
Clubs open their books for Justhate, Jackoff, Bar, Krueger,Herring, et al
Don White wrote:
"J i m" wrote in message ... Don White wrote: "NotNow" wrote in message ... I'd take that cap gun and shove it up his ass. Hee hee..this from the pantywaisted wimp who hid out in the swamp when Harry swaggered into his city. Lay off that Georgia Golden Bud...it's frying what little brain you have left. Donny. I know that Krause needs and appreciates your support, but you've saddled up a dead horse. Not so much supporting Harry...but trying to drill some sense into Kevin. Why bother? |
Clubs open their books for Justhate, Jackoff, Bar, Krueger, Herring, et al
"H the K" wrote in message m... Don White wrote: "J i m" wrote in message ... Don White wrote: "NotNow" wrote in message ... I'd take that cap gun and shove it up his ass. Hee hee..this from the pantywaisted wimp who hid out in the swamp when Harry swaggered into his city. Lay off that Georgia Golden Bud...it's frying what little brain you have left. Donny. I know that Krause needs and appreciates your support, but you've saddled up a dead horse. Not so much supporting Harry...but trying to drill some sense into Kevin. Why bother? Yup.. There are none so blind as those who will not see. |
Clubs open their books for Justhate, Jackoff, Bar, Krueger,Herring, et al
On Aug 17, 10:21*am, NotNow wrote:
D 1 wrote: H the K wrote: Tim wrote: On Aug 15, 8:18 am, H the K wrote *If I had a place to shoot those 400 meter shots, though, I'd be using a bolt action rifle, not a garand or one of its successors. That's always been a standing arguement if a bolt action is more accurate than automatic. I myself say "6 one way 1/2 a dozen the other" The arguement I hear is that the action of the bolt opening upon firing throws the barrel off target. But the only fallacy to that theory is that the trajectory is far gone before the bolt considers opening. A friend of mine has a National Match Garrand and a Springfield Armory reworked '03-A3 and with bench rest, he holds consistently *tight groups with both, in so much that you cant tell the difference in the accuracy of either. Well, I just bought a Zombie Killer, aka a rifle in .22LR. I wanted something that would be reasonably accurate right out of the box, so I did not want a Ruger 10/22, aka the "Bayliner" of rifles. Seriously, the Ruger is a fine rifle, very popular, but everyone I know who shoots one seems to spend its price all over again in barrels, actions, stocks, trigger work, and even receivers. I wanted a reasonably price rifle, $500 or less, that would perform properly with my having to rebuild it. I took a look at some CZ's...they make very nice bolt-action rifles in .22LR, sort of "mini-Mausers," if you will. But then I saw someone shooting a rifle I'd not seen or heard of before...a Thompson Center "Classic." I tried one and was astonished that with just the sights on the rifle I was shooting 1/2" to 1" groups at 50 yards after 10 minutes of practice. So I bought one. Mine looks like this: http://www.tcarms.com/firearms/rimfireR55AllWeather.php It's the "Classic," but with a target barrel and composite stock. Shoots great...unbelievable, actually. Got a scope incoming for it, a 6-20x40. Guaranteed to kill zombies at 100 yards, with 1/2" groups! Probably work on The Attack of the LoogyJustWaitaFreaks, too. The Ruger 10/22 is a proven, reliable rifle. *The upgrades your "friends" buy have ZERO to do with it's out-of-the-box accuracy and performance. *If it did, they would have never bought one. Good luck with your tc. *My bet is you Googled it rather than buying it. I'd take that cap gun and shove it up his ass.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Listen to the faggot...fantasizing about ****ing Harry in the ass.... Still posting to alt.lover-boys.... Pedo? |
Clubs open their books for Justhate, Jackoff, Bar, Krueger,Herring, et al
Scott Dickson wrote:
On Aug 17, 10:21 am, NotNow wrote: D 1 wrote: H the K wrote: Tim wrote: On Aug 15, 8:18 am, H the K wrote If I had a place to shoot those 400 meter shots, though, I'd be using a bolt action rifle, not a garand or one of its successors. That's always been a standing arguement if a bolt action is more accurate than automatic. I myself say "6 one way 1/2 a dozen the other" The arguement I hear is that the action of the bolt opening upon firing throws the barrel off target. But the only fallacy to that theory is that the trajectory is far gone before the bolt considers opening. A friend of mine has a National Match Garrand and a Springfield Armory reworked '03-A3 and with bench rest, he holds consistently tight groups with both, in so much that you cant tell the difference in the accuracy of either. Well, I just bought a Zombie Killer, aka a rifle in .22LR. I wanted something that would be reasonably accurate right out of the box, so I did not want a Ruger 10/22, aka the "Bayliner" of rifles. Seriously, the Ruger is a fine rifle, very popular, but everyone I know who shoots one seems to spend its price all over again in barrels, actions, stocks, trigger work, and even receivers. I wanted a reasonably price rifle, $500 or less, that would perform properly with my having to rebuild it. I took a look at some CZ's...they make very nice bolt-action rifles in .22LR, sort of "mini-Mausers," if you will. But then I saw someone shooting a rifle I'd not seen or heard of before...a Thompson Center "Classic." I tried one and was astonished that with just the sights on the rifle I was shooting 1/2" to 1" groups at 50 yards after 10 minutes of practice. So I bought one. Mine looks like this: http://www.tcarms.com/firearms/rimfireR55AllWeather.php It's the "Classic," but with a target barrel and composite stock. Shoots great...unbelievable, actually. Got a scope incoming for it, a 6-20x40. Guaranteed to kill zombies at 100 yards, with 1/2" groups! Probably work on The Attack of the LoogyJustWaitaFreaks, too. The Ruger 10/22 is a proven, reliable rifle. The upgrades your "friends" buy have ZERO to do with it's out-of-the-box accuracy and performance. If it did, they would have never bought one. Good luck with your tc. My bet is you Googled it rather than buying it. I'd take that cap gun and shove it up his ass.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Listen to the faggot...fantasizing about ****ing Harry in the ass.... Still posting to alt.lover-boys.... Pedo? It's the cross I have to bear here. :) |
Clubs open their books for Justhate, Jackoff, Bar, Krueger,Herring, et al
On Aug 17, 9:37*pm, H the K wrote:
Scott Dickson wrote: On Aug 17, 10:21 am, NotNow wrote: D 1 wrote: H the K wrote: Tim wrote: On Aug 15, 8:18 am, H the K wrote *If I had a place to shoot those 400 meter shots, though, I'd be using a bolt action rifle, not a garand or one of its successors. That's always been a standing arguement if a bolt action is more accurate than automatic. I myself say "6 one way 1/2 a dozen the other" The arguement I hear is that the action of the bolt opening upon firing throws the barrel off target. But the only fallacy to that theory is that the trajectory is far gone before the bolt considers opening. A friend of mine has a National Match Garrand and a Springfield Armory reworked '03-A3 and with bench rest, he holds consistently *tight groups with both, in so much that you cant tell the difference in the accuracy of either. Well, I just bought a Zombie Killer, aka a rifle in .22LR. I wanted something that would be reasonably accurate right out of the box, so I did not want a Ruger 10/22, aka the "Bayliner" of rifles. Seriously, the Ruger is a fine rifle, very popular, but everyone I know who shoots one seems to spend its price all over again in barrels, actions, stocks, trigger work, and even receivers. I wanted a reasonably price rifle, $500 or less, that would perform properly with my having to rebuild it. I took a look at some CZ's...they make very nice bolt-action rifles in .22LR, sort of "mini-Mausers," if you will. But then I saw someone shooting a rifle I'd not seen or heard of before...a Thompson Center "Classic." I tried one and was astonished that with just the sights on the rifle I was shooting 1/2" to 1" groups at 50 yards after 10 minutes of practice. So I bought one. Mine looks like this: http://www.tcarms.com/firearms/rimfireR55AllWeather.php It's the "Classic," but with a target barrel and composite stock. Shoots great...unbelievable, actually. Got a scope incoming for it, a 6-20x40. Guaranteed to kill zombies at 100 yards, with 1/2" groups! Probably work on The Attack of the LoogyJustWaitaFreaks, too. The Ruger 10/22 is a proven, reliable rifle. *The upgrades your "friends" buy have ZERO to do with it's out-of-the-box accuracy and performance. *If it did, they would have never bought one. Good luck with your tc. *My bet is you Googled it rather than buying it. I'd take that cap gun and shove it up his ass.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Listen to the faggot...fantasizing about ****ing Harry in the ass.... Still posting to alt.lover-boys.... Pedo? It's the cross I have to bear here. *:)- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - The fact you have a rifle-bearing Pedophile after you...or the fact that the Dope Army just cant handle the truth????? |
Clubs open their books for Justhate, Jackoff, Bar, Krueger,Herring, et al
Scott Dickson wrote:
On Aug 17, 9:37 pm, H the K wrote: Scott Dickson wrote: On Aug 17, 10:21 am, NotNow wrote: D 1 wrote: H the K wrote: Tim wrote: On Aug 15, 8:18 am, H the K wrote If I had a place to shoot those 400 meter shots, though, I'd be using a bolt action rifle, not a garand or one of its successors. That's always been a standing arguement if a bolt action is more accurate than automatic. I myself say "6 one way 1/2 a dozen the other" The arguement I hear is that the action of the bolt opening upon firing throws the barrel off target. But the only fallacy to that theory is that the trajectory is far gone before the bolt considers opening. A friend of mine has a National Match Garrand and a Springfield Armory reworked '03-A3 and with bench rest, he holds consistently tight groups with both, in so much that you cant tell the difference in the accuracy of either. Well, I just bought a Zombie Killer, aka a rifle in .22LR. I wanted something that would be reasonably accurate right out of the box, so I did not want a Ruger 10/22, aka the "Bayliner" of rifles. Seriously, the Ruger is a fine rifle, very popular, but everyone I know who shoots one seems to spend its price all over again in barrels, actions, stocks, trigger work, and even receivers. I wanted a reasonably price rifle, $500 or less, that would perform properly with my having to rebuild it. I took a look at some CZ's...they make very nice bolt-action rifles in .22LR, sort of "mini-Mausers," if you will. But then I saw someone shooting a rifle I'd not seen or heard of before...a Thompson Center "Classic." I tried one and was astonished that with just the sights on the rifle I was shooting 1/2" to 1" groups at 50 yards after 10 minutes of practice. So I bought one. Mine looks like this: http://www.tcarms.com/firearms/rimfireR55AllWeather.php It's the "Classic," but with a target barrel and composite stock. Shoots great...unbelievable, actually. Got a scope incoming for it, a 6-20x40. Guaranteed to kill zombies at 100 yards, with 1/2" groups! Probably work on The Attack of the LoogyJustWaitaFreaks, too. The Ruger 10/22 is a proven, reliable rifle. The upgrades your "friends" buy have ZERO to do with it's out-of-the-box accuracy and performance. If it did, they would have never bought one. Good luck with your tc. My bet is you Googled it rather than buying it. I'd take that cap gun and shove it up his ass.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Listen to the faggot...fantasizing about ****ing Harry in the ass.... Still posting to alt.lover-boys.... Pedo? It's the cross I have to bear here. :)- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - The fact you have a rifle-bearing Pedophile after you...or the fact that the Dope Army just cant handle the truth????? Plonkity plonk plonk plonk. No one is more deserving. |
Clubs open their books for Justhate, Jackoff, Bar, Krueger,Herring, et al
On Aug 18, 1:23*pm, J i m wrote:
Scott Dickson wrote: On Aug 17, 9:37 pm, H the K wrote: Scott Dickson wrote: On Aug 17, 10:21 am, NotNow wrote: D 1 wrote: H the K wrote: Tim wrote: On Aug 15, 8:18 am, H the K wrote *If I had a place to shoot those 400 meter shots, though, I'd be using a bolt action rifle, not a garand or one of its successors.. That's always been a standing arguement if a bolt action is more accurate than automatic. I myself say "6 one way 1/2 a dozen the other" The arguement I hear is that the action of the bolt opening upon firing throws the barrel off target. But the only fallacy to that theory is that the trajectory is far gone before the bolt considers opening. A friend of mine has a National Match Garrand and a Springfield Armory reworked '03-A3 and with bench rest, he holds consistently *tight groups with both, in so much that you cant tell the difference in the accuracy of either. Well, I just bought a Zombie Killer, aka a rifle in .22LR. I wanted something that would be reasonably accurate right out of the box, so I did not want a Ruger 10/22, aka the "Bayliner" of rifles. Seriously, the Ruger is a fine rifle, very popular, but everyone I know who shoots one seems to spend its price all over again in barrels, actions, stocks, trigger work, and even receivers. I wanted a reasonably price rifle, $500 or less, that would perform properly with my having to rebuild it. I took a look at some CZ's...they make very nice bolt-action rifles in .22LR, sort of "mini-Mausers," if you will. But then I saw someone shooting a rifle I'd not seen or heard of before...a Thompson Center "Classic." I tried one and was astonished that with just the sights on the rifle I was shooting 1/2" to 1" groups at 50 yards after 10 minutes of practice. So I bought one. Mine looks like this: http://www.tcarms.com/firearms/rimfireR55AllWeather.php It's the "Classic," but with a target barrel and composite stock. Shoots great...unbelievable, actually. Got a scope incoming for it, a 6-20x40. Guaranteed to kill zombies at 100 yards, with 1/2" groups! Probably work on The Attack of the LoogyJustWaitaFreaks, too. The Ruger 10/22 is a proven, reliable rifle. *The upgrades your "friends" buy have ZERO to do with it's out-of-the-box accuracy and performance. *If it did, they would have never bought one. Good luck with your tc. *My bet is you Googled it rather than buying it. I'd take that cap gun and shove it up his ass.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Listen to the faggot...fantasizing about ****ing Harry in the ass.... Still posting to alt.lover-boys.... Pedo? It's the cross I have to bear here. *:)- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - The fact you have a rifle-bearing Pedophile after you...or the fact that the Dope Army just cant handle the truth????? Plonkity plonk plonk plonk. No one is more deserving.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - That's good...plonk yourself, then we'll hear no more of your **** off- topic posts. HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAingen |
Clubs open their books for Justhate, Jackoff, Bar, Krueger,Herring, et al
Scott Dickson wrote:
On Aug 18, 1:23 pm, J i m wrote: Scott Dickson wrote: On Aug 17, 9:37 pm, H the K wrote: Scott Dickson wrote: On Aug 17, 10:21 am, NotNow wrote: D 1 wrote: H the K wrote: Tim wrote: On Aug 15, 8:18 am, H the K wrote If I had a place to shoot those 400 meter shots, though, I'd be using a bolt action rifle, not a garand or one of its successors. That's always been a standing arguement if a bolt action is more accurate than automatic. I myself say "6 one way 1/2 a dozen the other" The arguement I hear is that the action of the bolt opening upon firing throws the barrel off target. But the only fallacy to that theory is that the trajectory is far gone before the bolt considers opening. A friend of mine has a National Match Garrand and a Springfield Armory reworked '03-A3 and with bench rest, he holds consistently tight groups with both, in so much that you cant tell the difference in the accuracy of either. Well, I just bought a Zombie Killer, aka a rifle in .22LR. I wanted something that would be reasonably accurate right out of the box, so I did not want a Ruger 10/22, aka the "Bayliner" of rifles. Seriously, the Ruger is a fine rifle, very popular, but everyone I know who shoots one seems to spend its price all over again in barrels, actions, stocks, trigger work, and even receivers. I wanted a reasonably price rifle, $500 or less, that would perform properly with my having to rebuild it. I took a look at some CZ's...they make very nice bolt-action rifles in .22LR, sort of "mini-Mausers," if you will. But then I saw someone shooting a rifle I'd not seen or heard of before...a Thompson Center "Classic." I tried one and was astonished that with just the sights on the rifle I was shooting 1/2" to 1" groups at 50 yards after 10 minutes of practice. So I bought one. Mine looks like this: http://www.tcarms.com/firearms/rimfireR55AllWeather.php It's the "Classic," but with a target barrel and composite stock. Shoots great...unbelievable, actually. Got a scope incoming for it, a 6-20x40. Guaranteed to kill zombies at 100 yards, with 1/2" groups! Probably work on The Attack of the LoogyJustWaitaFreaks, too. The Ruger 10/22 is a proven, reliable rifle. The upgrades your "friends" buy have ZERO to do with it's out-of-the-box accuracy and performance. If it did, they would have never bought one. Good luck with your tc. My bet is you Googled it rather than buying it. I'd take that cap gun and shove it up his ass.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Listen to the faggot...fantasizing about ****ing Harry in the ass.... Still posting to alt.lover-boys.... Pedo? It's the cross I have to bear here. :)- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - The fact you have a rifle-bearing Pedophile after you...or the fact that the Dope Army just cant handle the truth????? Plonkity plonk plonk plonk. No one is more deserving.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - That's good...plonk yourself, then we'll hear no more of your **** off- topic posts. HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAingen I wouldn't worry about flajim...he's just another of the right-wing cowards here. |
Clubs open their books for Justhate, Jackoff, Bar, Krueger,Herring, et al
Scott Dickson wrote:
On Aug 17, 9:37 pm, H the K wrote: Scott Dickson wrote: On Aug 17, 10:21 am, NotNow wrote: D 1 wrote: H the K wrote: Tim wrote: On Aug 15, 8:18 am, H the K wrote If I had a place to shoot those 400 meter shots, though, I'd be using a bolt action rifle, not a garand or one of its successors. That's always been a standing arguement if a bolt action is more accurate than automatic. I myself say "6 one way 1/2 a dozen the other" The arguement I hear is that the action of the bolt opening upon firing throws the barrel off target. But the only fallacy to that theory is that the trajectory is far gone before the bolt considers opening. A friend of mine has a National Match Garrand and a Springfield Armory reworked '03-A3 and with bench rest, he holds consistently tight groups with both, in so much that you cant tell the difference in the accuracy of either. Well, I just bought a Zombie Killer, aka a rifle in .22LR. I wanted something that would be reasonably accurate right out of the box, so I did not want a Ruger 10/22, aka the "Bayliner" of rifles. Seriously, the Ruger is a fine rifle, very popular, but everyone I know who shoots one seems to spend its price all over again in barrels, actions, stocks, trigger work, and even receivers. I wanted a reasonably price rifle, $500 or less, that would perform properly with my having to rebuild it. I took a look at some CZ's...they make very nice bolt-action rifles in .22LR, sort of "mini-Mausers," if you will. But then I saw someone shooting a rifle I'd not seen or heard of before...a Thompson Center "Classic." I tried one and was astonished that with just the sights on the rifle I was shooting 1/2" to 1" groups at 50 yards after 10 minutes of practice. So I bought one. Mine looks like this: http://www.tcarms.com/firearms/rimfireR55AllWeather.php It's the "Classic," but with a target barrel and composite stock. Shoots great...unbelievable, actually. Got a scope incoming for it, a 6-20x40. Guaranteed to kill zombies at 100 yards, with 1/2" groups! Probably work on The Attack of the LoogyJustWaitaFreaks, too. The Ruger 10/22 is a proven, reliable rifle. The upgrades your "friends" buy have ZERO to do with it's out-of-the-box accuracy and performance. If it did, they would have never bought one. Good luck with your tc. My bet is you Googled it rather than buying it. I'd take that cap gun and shove it up his ass.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Listen to the faggot...fantasizing about ****ing Harry in the ass.... Still posting to alt.lover-boys.... Pedo? It's the cross I have to bear here. :)- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - The fact you have a rifle-bearing Pedophile after you...or the fact that the Dope Army just cant handle the truth????? Loogy is all bluff and boast, manly enough only to break the arms of little girls. The only question I have is whether he is just as dumb as JustHateaFreak or...dumber. Each time I think I have that figured out, one of them will top the other. See if you can top this for stupidity...about a year ago, JustHate was lamenting the high cost of certain medications and access to a convenient physician. I think it was because he either had no health insurance, or crappy health insurance, or was dependent upon the state. Whatever the reasons, I offered to put him in touch with a couple of people whose success rate for resolving such problems for patients and their family members approached 100 per cent. JustHate, d.f. that he is, said he'd muddle on through with what he didn't have. |
Clubs open their books for Justhate, Jackoff, Bar, Krueger, Herring, et al
"H the K" wrote in message m... Scott Dickson wrote: On Aug 17, 9:37 pm, H the K wrote: Scott Dickson wrote: On Aug 17, 10:21 am, NotNow wrote: D 1 wrote: H the K wrote: Tim wrote: On Aug 15, 8:18 am, H the K wrote If I had a place to shoot those 400 meter shots, though, I'd be using a bolt action rifle, not a garand or one of its successors. That's always been a standing arguement if a bolt action is more accurate than automatic. I myself say "6 one way 1/2 a dozen the other" The arguement I hear is that the action of the bolt opening upon firing throws the barrel off target. But the only fallacy to that theory is that the trajectory is far gone before the bolt considers opening. A friend of mine has a National Match Garrand and a Springfield Armory reworked '03-A3 and with bench rest, he holds consistently tight groups with both, in so much that you cant tell the difference in the accuracy of either. Well, I just bought a Zombie Killer, aka a rifle in .22LR. I wanted something that would be reasonably accurate right out of the box, so I did not want a Ruger 10/22, aka the "Bayliner" of rifles. Seriously, the Ruger is a fine rifle, very popular, but everyone I know who shoots one seems to spend its price all over again in barrels, actions, stocks, trigger work, and even receivers. I wanted a reasonably price rifle, $500 or less, that would perform properly with my having to rebuild it. I took a look at some CZ's...they make very nice bolt-action rifles in .22LR, sort of "mini-Mausers," if you will. But then I saw someone shooting a rifle I'd not seen or heard of before...a Thompson Center "Classic." I tried one and was astonished that with just the sights on the rifle I was shooting 1/2" to 1" groups at 50 yards after 10 minutes of practice. So I bought one. Mine looks like this: http://www.tcarms.com/firearms/rimfireR55AllWeather.php It's the "Classic," but with a target barrel and composite stock. Shoots great...unbelievable, actually. Got a scope incoming for it, a 6-20x40. Guaranteed to kill zombies at 100 yards, with 1/2" groups! Probably work on The Attack of the LoogyJustWaitaFreaks, too. The Ruger 10/22 is a proven, reliable rifle. The upgrades your "friends" buy have ZERO to do with it's out-of-the-box accuracy and performance. If it did, they would have never bought one. Good luck with your tc. My bet is you Googled it rather than buying it. I'd take that cap gun and shove it up his ass.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Listen to the faggot...fantasizing about ****ing Harry in the ass.... Still posting to alt.lover-boys.... Pedo? It's the cross I have to bear here. :)- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - The fact you have a rifle-bearing Pedophile after you...or the fact that the Dope Army just cant handle the truth????? Loogy is all bluff and boast, manly enough only to break the arms of little girls. The only question I have is whether he is just as dumb as JustHateaFreak or...dumber. Each time I think I have that figured out, one of them will top the other. See if you can top this for stupidity...about a year ago, JustHate was lamenting the high cost of certain medications and access to a convenient physician. I think it was because he either had no health insurance, or crappy health insurance, or was dependent upon the state. Whatever the reasons, I offered to put him in touch with a couple of people whose success rate for resolving such problems for patients and their family members approached 100 per cent. JustHate, d.f. that he is, said he'd muddle on through with what he didn't have. Do you think he was eying Pappys bank account? |
Clubs open their books for Justhate, Jackoff, Bar, Krueger,Herring, et al
Don White wrote:
"H the K" wrote in message m... Scott Dickson wrote: On Aug 17, 9:37 pm, H the K wrote: Scott Dickson wrote: On Aug 17, 10:21 am, NotNow wrote: D 1 wrote: H the K wrote: Tim wrote: On Aug 15, 8:18 am, H the K wrote If I had a place to shoot those 400 meter shots, though, I'd be using a bolt action rifle, not a garand or one of its successors. That's always been a standing arguement if a bolt action is more accurate than automatic. I myself say "6 one way 1/2 a dozen the other" The arguement I hear is that the action of the bolt opening upon firing throws the barrel off target. But the only fallacy to that theory is that the trajectory is far gone before the bolt considers opening. A friend of mine has a National Match Garrand and a Springfield Armory reworked '03-A3 and with bench rest, he holds consistently tight groups with both, in so much that you cant tell the difference in the accuracy of either. Well, I just bought a Zombie Killer, aka a rifle in .22LR. I wanted something that would be reasonably accurate right out of the box, so I did not want a Ruger 10/22, aka the "Bayliner" of rifles. Seriously, the Ruger is a fine rifle, very popular, but everyone I know who shoots one seems to spend its price all over again in barrels, actions, stocks, trigger work, and even receivers. I wanted a reasonably price rifle, $500 or less, that would perform properly with my having to rebuild it. I took a look at some CZ's...they make very nice bolt-action rifles in .22LR, sort of "mini-Mausers," if you will. But then I saw someone shooting a rifle I'd not seen or heard of before...a Thompson Center "Classic." I tried one and was astonished that with just the sights on the rifle I was shooting 1/2" to 1" groups at 50 yards after 10 minutes of practice. So I bought one. Mine looks like this: http://www.tcarms.com/firearms/rimfireR55AllWeather.php It's the "Classic," but with a target barrel and composite stock. Shoots great...unbelievable, actually. Got a scope incoming for it, a 6-20x40. Guaranteed to kill zombies at 100 yards, with 1/2" groups! Probably work on The Attack of the LoogyJustWaitaFreaks, too. The Ruger 10/22 is a proven, reliable rifle. The upgrades your "friends" buy have ZERO to do with it's out-of-the-box accuracy and performance. If it did, they would have never bought one. Good luck with your tc. My bet is you Googled it rather than buying it. I'd take that cap gun and shove it up his ass.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Listen to the faggot...fantasizing about ****ing Harry in the ass.... Still posting to alt.lover-boys.... Pedo? It's the cross I have to bear here. :)- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - The fact you have a rifle-bearing Pedophile after you...or the fact that the Dope Army just cant handle the truth????? Loogy is all bluff and boast, manly enough only to break the arms of little girls. The only question I have is whether he is just as dumb as JustHateaFreak or...dumber. Each time I think I have that figured out, one of them will top the other. See if you can top this for stupidity...about a year ago, JustHate was lamenting the high cost of certain medications and access to a convenient physician. I think it was because he either had no health insurance, or crappy health insurance, or was dependent upon the state. Whatever the reasons, I offered to put him in touch with a couple of people whose success rate for resolving such problems for patients and their family members approached 100 per cent. JustHate, d.f. that he is, said he'd muddle on through with what he didn't have. Do you think he was eying Pappys bank account? I don't recall who the care was for...maybe for Mrs. JustHate, who was more than a bit upset over the sight of that kiddie motorcycle in her kitchen. |
Clubs open their books for Justhate, Jackoff, Bar, Krueger, Herring, et al
On Tue, 18 Aug 2009 17:56:32 -0300, "Don White"
wrote: "H the K" wrote in message om... Scott Dickson wrote: On Aug 17, 9:37 pm, H the K wrote: Scott Dickson wrote: On Aug 17, 10:21 am, NotNow wrote: D 1 wrote: H the K wrote: Tim wrote: On Aug 15, 8:18 am, H the K wrote If I had a place to shoot those 400 meter shots, though, I'd be using a bolt action rifle, not a garand or one of its successors. That's always been a standing arguement if a bolt action is more accurate than automatic. I myself say "6 one way 1/2 a dozen the other" The arguement I hear is that the action of the bolt opening upon firing throws the barrel off target. But the only fallacy to that theory is that the trajectory is far gone before the bolt considers opening. A friend of mine has a National Match Garrand and a Springfield Armory reworked '03-A3 and with bench rest, he holds consistently tight groups with both, in so much that you cant tell the difference in the accuracy of either. Well, I just bought a Zombie Killer, aka a rifle in .22LR. I wanted something that would be reasonably accurate right out of the box, so I did not want a Ruger 10/22, aka the "Bayliner" of rifles. Seriously, the Ruger is a fine rifle, very popular, but everyone I know who shoots one seems to spend its price all over again in barrels, actions, stocks, trigger work, and even receivers. I wanted a reasonably price rifle, $500 or less, that would perform properly with my having to rebuild it. I took a look at some CZ's...they make very nice bolt-action rifles in .22LR, sort of "mini-Mausers," if you will. But then I saw someone shooting a rifle I'd not seen or heard of before...a Thompson Center "Classic." I tried one and was astonished that with just the sights on the rifle I was shooting 1/2" to 1" groups at 50 yards after 10 minutes of practice. So I bought one. Mine looks like this: http://www.tcarms.com/firearms/rimfireR55AllWeather.php It's the "Classic," but with a target barrel and composite stock. Shoots great...unbelievable, actually. Got a scope incoming for it, a 6-20x40. Guaranteed to kill zombies at 100 yards, with 1/2" groups! Probably work on The Attack of the LoogyJustWaitaFreaks, too. The Ruger 10/22 is a proven, reliable rifle. The upgrades your "friends" buy have ZERO to do with it's out-of-the-box accuracy and performance. If it did, they would have never bought one. Good luck with your tc. My bet is you Googled it rather than buying it. I'd take that cap gun and shove it up his ass.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Listen to the faggot...fantasizing about ****ing Harry in the ass.... Still posting to alt.lover-boys.... Pedo? It's the cross I have to bear here. :)- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - The fact you have a rifle-bearing Pedophile after you...or the fact that the Dope Army just cant handle the truth????? Loogy is all bluff and boast, manly enough only to break the arms of little girls. The only question I have is whether he is just as dumb as JustHateaFreak or...dumber. Each time I think I have that figured out, one of them will top the other. See if you can top this for stupidity...about a year ago, JustHate was lamenting the high cost of certain medications and access to a convenient physician. I think it was because he either had no health insurance, or crappy health insurance, or was dependent upon the state. Whatever the reasons, I offered to put him in touch with a couple of people whose success rate for resolving such problems for patients and their family members approached 100 per cent. JustHate, d.f. that he is, said he'd muddle on through with what he didn't have. Do you think he was eying Pappys bank account? How's your mom, Don? -- John H "BEND OVER - The 'change' is coming!" |
Clubs open their books for Justhate, Jackoff, Bar, Krueger, Herring, et al
"Proprietario di Guzzi" wrote in message ... On Tue, 18 Aug 2009 17:56:32 -0300, "Don White" wrote: "H the K" wrote in message news:mLudnVYxfKvujhbXnZ2dnUVZ_tOdnZ2d@earthlink. com... Scott Dickson wrote: On Aug 17, 9:37 pm, H the K wrote: Scott Dickson wrote: On Aug 17, 10:21 am, NotNow wrote: D 1 wrote: H the K wrote: Tim wrote: On Aug 15, 8:18 am, H the K wrote If I had a place to shoot those 400 meter shots, though, I'd be using a bolt action rifle, not a garand or one of its successors. That's always been a standing arguement if a bolt action is more accurate than automatic. I myself say "6 one way 1/2 a dozen the other" The arguement I hear is that the action of the bolt opening upon firing throws the barrel off target. But the only fallacy to that theory is that the trajectory is far gone before the bolt considers opening. A friend of mine has a National Match Garrand and a Springfield Armory reworked '03-A3 and with bench rest, he holds consistently tight groups with both, in so much that you cant tell the difference in the accuracy of either. Well, I just bought a Zombie Killer, aka a rifle in .22LR. I wanted something that would be reasonably accurate right out of the box, so I did not want a Ruger 10/22, aka the "Bayliner" of rifles. Seriously, the Ruger is a fine rifle, very popular, but everyone I know who shoots one seems to spend its price all over again in barrels, actions, stocks, trigger work, and even receivers. I wanted a reasonably price rifle, $500 or less, that would perform properly with my having to rebuild it. I took a look at some CZ's...they make very nice bolt-action rifles in .22LR, sort of "mini-Mausers," if you will. But then I saw someone shooting a rifle I'd not seen or heard of before...a Thompson Center "Classic." I tried one and was astonished that with just the sights on the rifle I was shooting 1/2" to 1" groups at 50 yards after 10 minutes of practice. So I bought one. Mine looks like this: http://www.tcarms.com/firearms/rimfireR55AllWeather.php It's the "Classic," but with a target barrel and composite stock. Shoots great...unbelievable, actually. Got a scope incoming for it, a 6-20x40. Guaranteed to kill zombies at 100 yards, with 1/2" groups! Probably work on The Attack of the LoogyJustWaitaFreaks, too. The Ruger 10/22 is a proven, reliable rifle. The upgrades your "friends" buy have ZERO to do with it's out-of-the-box accuracy and performance. If it did, they would have never bought one. Good luck with your tc. My bet is you Googled it rather than buying it. I'd take that cap gun and shove it up his ass.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Listen to the faggot...fantasizing about ****ing Harry in the ass.... Still posting to alt.lover-boys.... Pedo? It's the cross I have to bear here. :)- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - The fact you have a rifle-bearing Pedophile after you...or the fact that the Dope Army just cant handle the truth????? Loogy is all bluff and boast, manly enough only to break the arms of little girls. The only question I have is whether he is just as dumb as JustHateaFreak or...dumber. Each time I think I have that figured out, one of them will top the other. See if you can top this for stupidity...about a year ago, JustHate was lamenting the high cost of certain medications and access to a convenient physician. I think it was because he either had no health insurance, or crappy health insurance, or was dependent upon the state. Whatever the reasons, I offered to put him in touch with a couple of people whose success rate for resolving such problems for patients and their family members approached 100 per cent. JustHate, d.f. that he is, said he'd muddle on through with what he didn't have. Do you think he was eying Pappys bank account? How's your mom, Don? -- John H How's your daughter, Johnny. Almost time for another beg-a-thon? |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:41 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com