|
Libs vs Cons
I just dont like being told what to do whether it be by Libs or Cons.
Cons are traditionally the party of religion but hardly anybody takes the religious right serriously so I ignore them. It seems to me that it is always the libs attacking personal freedom and demanding adherence to their ideas whereas cons at least believe in individuality. If the Cons started demanding I go along with their ideas I'd resist them too. I resist the religion of Obama for the same reason I resist Conservative religion, most religion is just nuts. Libs wanna force me to pay for health schemes I do not think will work and I know will bankrupt all of us so I resist that. Likewise I resisted the parts of the patriot act that required librarians to turn over records (eventually overturned). My point in all of this is that for me it is not a matter of Liberal vs Conservative because I am simply not conservative. It IS a matter of freedom vs servitude. |
Libs vs Cons
"Frogwatch" wrote in message ... I just dont like being told what to do whether it be by Libs or Cons. Cons are traditionally the party of religion but hardly anybody takes the religious right serriously so I ignore them. It seems to me that it is always the libs attacking personal freedom and demanding adherence to their ideas whereas cons at least believe in individuality. If the Cons started demanding I go along with their ideas I'd resist them too. I resist the religion of Obama for the same reason I resist Conservative religion, most religion is just nuts. Libs wanna force me to pay for health schemes I do not think will work and I know will bankrupt all of us so I resist that. Likewise I resisted the parts of the patriot act that required librarians to turn over records (eventually overturned). My point in all of this is that for me it is not a matter of Liberal vs Conservative because I am simply not conservative. It IS a matter of freedom vs servitude. My thinking, exactly. Good for you. |
Libs vs Cons
"Frogwatch" wrote in message ... I just dont like being told what to do whether it be by Libs or Cons. Cons are traditionally the party of religion but hardly anybody takes the religious right serriously so I ignore them. It seems to me that it is always the libs attacking personal freedom and demanding adherence to their ideas whereas cons at least believe in individuality. If the Cons started demanding I go along with their ideas I'd resist them too. I resist the religion of Obama for the same reason I resist Conservative religion, most religion is just nuts. Libs wanna force me to pay for health schemes I do not think will work and I know will bankrupt all of us so I resist that. Likewise I resisted the parts of the patriot act that required librarians to turn over records (eventually overturned). My point in all of this is that for me it is not a matter of Liberal vs Conservative because I am simply not conservative. It IS a matter of freedom vs servitude. It's the greediness of your Wall Street and corporate leaders who will bankrupt you. |
Libs vs Cons
Frogwatch wrote:
I just dont like being told what to do whether it be by Libs or Cons. Cons are traditionally the party of religion but hardly anybody takes the religious right serriously so I ignore them. It seems to me that it is always the libs attacking personal freedom and demanding adherence to their ideas whereas cons at least believe in individuality. If the Cons started demanding I go along with their ideas I'd resist them too. I resist the religion of Obama for the same reason I resist Conservative religion, most religion is just nuts. Libs wanna force me to pay for health schemes I do not think will work and I know will bankrupt all of us so I resist that. Likewise I resisted the parts of the patriot act that required librarians to turn over records (eventually overturned). My point in all of this is that for me it is not a matter of Liberal vs Conservative because I am simply not conservative. It IS a matter of freedom vs servitude. Your Republican politicians and their buddies on wall street already bankrupted us. |
Libs vs Cons
On Aug 11, 3:34*pm, "Don White" wrote:
"Frogwatch" wrote in message ... I just dont like being told what to do whether it be by Libs or Cons. Cons are traditionally the party of religion but hardly anybody takes the religious right serriously so I ignore them. *It seems to me that it is always the libs attacking personal freedom and demanding adherence to their ideas whereas cons at least believe in individuality. *If the Cons started demanding I go along with their ideas I'd resist them too. *I resist the religion of Obama for the same reason I resist Conservative religion, most religion is just nuts. *Libs wanna force me to pay for health schemes I do not think will work and I know will bankrupt all of us so I resist that. Likewise I resisted the parts of the patriot act that required librarians to turn over records (eventually overturned). My point in all of this is that for me it is not a matter of Liberal vs Conservative because I am simply not conservative. *It IS a matter of freedom vs servitude. It's the greediness of your Wall Street and corporate leaders who will bankrupt you. Wall St did not force me to buy anything, the govt forces me to pay taxes. Nobody forced you to overpay for an overpriced piece of real estate. The govt does force me to support them. Some govt is good because Libertarianism simply does not work. Govt regulation is actually good if it isnt too extreme. I've got no objection to reasonable taxation. I think we should have a safety net for people who have problems or who make a few poor choices. However, dependency should not be a choice for people. Likewise, given a choice tween pvt and govt enterprise, I'd favor private. I see nothing radical about my views whereas I do see people who favor extreme regulations and govt intrusion into peoples lives as being bizarre and extreme. |
Libs vs Cons
Frogwatch wrote:
On Aug 11, 3:34 pm, "Don White" wrote: "Frogwatch" wrote in message ... I just dont like being told what to do whether it be by Libs or Cons. Cons are traditionally the party of religion but hardly anybody takes the religious right serriously so I ignore them. It seems to me that it is always the libs attacking personal freedom and demanding adherence to their ideas whereas cons at least believe in individuality. If the Cons started demanding I go along with their ideas I'd resist them too. I resist the religion of Obama for the same reason I resist Conservative religion, most religion is just nuts. Libs wanna force me to pay for health schemes I do not think will work and I know will bankrupt all of us so I resist that. Likewise I resisted the parts of the patriot act that required librarians to turn over records (eventually overturned). My point in all of this is that for me it is not a matter of Liberal vs Conservative because I am simply not conservative. It IS a matter of freedom vs servitude. It's the greediness of your Wall Street and corporate leaders who will bankrupt you. Wall St did not force me to buy anything, the govt forces me to pay taxes. Nobody forced you to overpay for an overpriced piece of real estate. The govt does force me to support them. Some govt is good because Libertarianism simply does not work. Govt regulation is actually good if it isnt too extreme. I've got no objection to reasonable taxation. I think we should have a safety net for people who have problems or who make a few poor choices. However, dependency should not be a choice for people. Likewise, given a choice tween pvt and govt enterprise, I'd favor private. I see nothing radical about my views whereas I do see people who favor extreme regulations and govt intrusion into peoples lives as being bizarre and extreme. Bizarre? You mean forcing honesty and accountability on health insurers? |
Libs vs Cons
On Tue, 11 Aug 2009 12:11:46 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch
wrote: I just dont like being told what to do whether it be by Libs or Cons. Cons are traditionally the party of religion but hardly anybody takes the religious right serriously so I ignore them. It seems to me that it is always the libs attacking personal freedom and demanding adherence to their ideas whereas cons at least believe in individuality. If the Cons started demanding I go along with their ideas I'd resist them too. I resist the religion of Obama for the same reason I resist Conservative religion, most religion is just nuts. Libs wanna force me to pay for health schemes I do not think will work and I know will bankrupt all of us so I resist that. Likewise I resisted the parts of the patriot act that required librarians to turn over records (eventually overturned). My point in all of this is that for me it is not a matter of Liberal vs Conservative because I am simply not conservative. It IS a matter of freedom vs servitude. I don't believe in roads, bridges or interstate highways. Why should I have to spend my hard-earned money on cement? I demand the government not make me invest in cement. |
Libs vs Cons
jps wrote:
On Tue, 11 Aug 2009 12:11:46 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch wrote: I just dont like being told what to do whether it be by Libs or Cons. Cons are traditionally the party of religion but hardly anybody takes the religious right serriously so I ignore them. It seems to me that it is always the libs attacking personal freedom and demanding adherence to their ideas whereas cons at least believe in individuality. If the Cons started demanding I go along with their ideas I'd resist them too. I resist the religion of Obama for the same reason I resist Conservative religion, most religion is just nuts. Libs wanna force me to pay for health schemes I do not think will work and I know will bankrupt all of us so I resist that. Likewise I resisted the parts of the patriot act that required librarians to turn over records (eventually overturned). My point in all of this is that for me it is not a matter of Liberal vs Conservative because I am simply not conservative. It IS a matter of freedom vs servitude. I don't believe in roads, bridges or interstate highways. Why should I have to spend my hard-earned money on cement? I demand the government not make me invest in cement. Gotta love froggy's pronouncements: "Cons are traditionally the party of religion but hardly anybody takes the religious right serriously so I ignore them." Hardly anybody takes the religous right seriously...except for the Republican Party. |
Libs vs Cons
"H the K" wrote in message ... Frogwatch wrote: I just dont like being told what to do whether it be by Libs or Cons. Cons are traditionally the party of religion but hardly anybody takes the religious right serriously so I ignore them. It seems to me that it is always the libs attacking personal freedom and demanding adherence to their ideas whereas cons at least believe in individuality. If the Cons started demanding I go along with their ideas I'd resist them too. I resist the religion of Obama for the same reason I resist Conservative religion, most religion is just nuts. Libs wanna force me to pay for health schemes I do not think will work and I know will bankrupt all of us so I resist that. Likewise I resisted the parts of the patriot act that required librarians to turn over records (eventually overturned). My point in all of this is that for me it is not a matter of Liberal vs Conservative because I am simply not conservative. It IS a matter of freedom vs servitude. Your Republican politicians and their buddies on wall street already bankrupted us. Republican Politicians? Who just gave Goldman Sacks-us and the Fed, a private bank, a trillion bucks? |
Libs vs Cons
"jps" wrote in message ... On Tue, 11 Aug 2009 12:11:46 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch wrote: I just dont like being told what to do whether it be by Libs or Cons. Cons are traditionally the party of religion but hardly anybody takes the religious right serriously so I ignore them. It seems to me that it is always the libs attacking personal freedom and demanding adherence to their ideas whereas cons at least believe in individuality. If the Cons started demanding I go along with their ideas I'd resist them too. I resist the religion of Obama for the same reason I resist Conservative religion, most religion is just nuts. Libs wanna force me to pay for health schemes I do not think will work and I know will bankrupt all of us so I resist that. Likewise I resisted the parts of the patriot act that required librarians to turn over records (eventually overturned). My point in all of this is that for me it is not a matter of Liberal vs Conservative because I am simply not conservative. It IS a matter of freedom vs servitude. I don't believe in roads, bridges or interstate highways. Why should I have to spend my hard-earned money on cement? I demand the government not make me invest in cement. That is under the reasonable taxation. That is what government should be doing. Not inserting themselves in most every facet of our lives. The Fed's now spend about 400% of the what they spent 40 years ago, adjusted for inflation. |
Libs vs Cons
On Aug 11, 7:25*pm, "Calif Bill" wrote:
"jps" wrote in message ... On Tue, 11 Aug 2009 12:11:46 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch wrote: I just dont like being told what to do whether it be by Libs or Cons. Cons are traditionally the party of religion but hardly anybody takes the religious right serriously so I ignore them. *It seems to me that it is always the libs attacking personal freedom and demanding adherence to their ideas whereas cons at least believe in individuality. *If the Cons started demanding I go along with their ideas I'd resist them too. *I resist the religion of Obama for the same reason I resist Conservative religion, most religion is just nuts. *Libs wanna force me to pay for health schemes I do not think will work and I know will bankrupt all of us so I resist that. Likewise I resisted the parts of the patriot act that required librarians to turn over records (eventually overturned). My point in all of this is that for me it is not a matter of Liberal vs Conservative because I am simply not conservative. *It IS a matter of freedom vs servitude. I don't believe in roads, bridges or interstate highways. *Why should I have to spend my hard-earned money on cement? I demand the government not make me invest in cement. That is under the reasonable taxation. *That is what government should be doing. *Not inserting themselves in most every facet of our lives. *The Fed's now spend about 400% of the what they spent 40 years ago, adjusted for inflation. Lefties who supported Stalin, Mao, Castro, Pol Pot etc in killing a hundred million people I should trust with my life? Lemme see, I should trust my life to a group that wants to shoot protestors? I s'pose that would seem reasonable to the party of Ayers. |
Libs vs Cons
"Frogwatch" wrote in message ... I just dont like being told what to do whether it be by Libs or Cons. Cons are traditionally the party of religion but hardly anybody takes the religious right serriously so I ignore them. It seems to me that it is always the libs attacking personal freedom and demanding adherence to their ideas whereas cons at least believe in individuality. If the Cons started demanding I go along with their ideas I'd resist them too. I resist the religion of Obama for the same reason I resist Conservative religion, most religion is just nuts. Libs wanna force me to pay for health schemes I do not think will work and I know will bankrupt all of us so I resist that. Likewise I resisted the parts of the patriot act that required librarians to turn over records (eventually overturned). My point in all of this is that for me it is not a matter of Liberal vs Conservative because I am simply not conservative. It IS a matter of freedom vs servitude. The real issue is the culture. A steady deterioration in values such as work hard, develop yourself to become better and respect for others has been replaced by a generation of entitlement attitude, greed, low self worth low life. See, wanting big government to run your life is an admission that you are incapable, incompetant or too lazy to run your own life. Instead of getting off your arse to earn something you want, you lay back and with envy vote for the government to steal for you. The liberal-statism way which rewards incompetance and punishes success. Since more an more are greedy slazy slugs, it makes rise to statism where everyone really suffers but has appeal for low intelligence types. Sevitude has already started. Income tax for example, if we add up GM+auto and Bank bailouts in Canada, it totals some $95B or so, which is about 82% of the gross federal income tax on the people for the year. So in fact, workers are paying taxes to banks and auto corruption. Just like in SciFi, the corporations are our masters. This is corruption, as taxing people for banks and corrupt auto is not morally correct. It steals from hard working families that through no fault of their own are now forced to subsidise big business via taxation. It is enslavement and it is already on us. |
Libs vs Cons
On Tue, 11 Aug 2009 16:25:12 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote: "jps" wrote in message .. . On Tue, 11 Aug 2009 12:11:46 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch wrote: I just dont like being told what to do whether it be by Libs or Cons. Cons are traditionally the party of religion but hardly anybody takes the religious right serriously so I ignore them. It seems to me that it is always the libs attacking personal freedom and demanding adherence to their ideas whereas cons at least believe in individuality. If the Cons started demanding I go along with their ideas I'd resist them too. I resist the religion of Obama for the same reason I resist Conservative religion, most religion is just nuts. Libs wanna force me to pay for health schemes I do not think will work and I know will bankrupt all of us so I resist that. Likewise I resisted the parts of the patriot act that required librarians to turn over records (eventually overturned). My point in all of this is that for me it is not a matter of Liberal vs Conservative because I am simply not conservative. It IS a matter of freedom vs servitude. I don't believe in roads, bridges or interstate highways. Why should I have to spend my hard-earned money on cement? I demand the government not make me invest in cement. That is under the reasonable taxation. That is what government should be doing. Not inserting themselves in most every facet of our lives. The Fed's now spend about 400% of the what they spent 40 years ago, adjusted for inflation. I DON'T WANT CEMENT, I want blacktop. Cement is too expensive and makes my tires sound like an unmuffled jet engine, therefore causing me hearing loss. And, the Gov't should cover the cost of my hearing loss under medicare but I don't want them in that business. Damn them with their helping the elderly! |
Libs vs Cons
On Tue, 11 Aug 2009 17:16:49 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch
wrote: On Aug 11, 7:25*pm, "Calif Bill" wrote: "jps" wrote in message ... On Tue, 11 Aug 2009 12:11:46 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch wrote: I just dont like being told what to do whether it be by Libs or Cons. Cons are traditionally the party of religion but hardly anybody takes the religious right serriously so I ignore them. *It seems to me that it is always the libs attacking personal freedom and demanding adherence to their ideas whereas cons at least believe in individuality. *If the Cons started demanding I go along with their ideas I'd resist them too. *I resist the religion of Obama for the same reason I resist Conservative religion, most religion is just nuts. *Libs wanna force me to pay for health schemes I do not think will work and I know will bankrupt all of us so I resist that. Likewise I resisted the parts of the patriot act that required librarians to turn over records (eventually overturned). My point in all of this is that for me it is not a matter of Liberal vs Conservative because I am simply not conservative. *It IS a matter of freedom vs servitude. I don't believe in roads, bridges or interstate highways. *Why should I have to spend my hard-earned money on cement? I demand the government not make me invest in cement. That is under the reasonable taxation. *That is what government should be doing. *Not inserting themselves in most every facet of our lives. *The Fed's now spend about 400% of the what they spent 40 years ago, adjusted for inflation. Lefties who supported Stalin, Mao, Castro, Pol Pot etc in killing a hundred million people I should trust with my life? Lemme see, I should trust my life to a group that wants to shoot protestors? I s'pose that would seem reasonable to the party of Ayers. Oh ****, have you gotten into your wife's oxycontin supply? Did you send the maid out to purchase more? You're gonna need 'em if you expect to continue coming up with highly delusional scenarios. |
Libs vs Cons
jps wrote:
On Tue, 11 Aug 2009 17:16:49 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch wrote: On Aug 11, 7:25 pm, "Calif Bill" wrote: "jps" wrote in message ... On Tue, 11 Aug 2009 12:11:46 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch wrote: I just dont like being told what to do whether it be by Libs or Cons. Cons are traditionally the party of religion but hardly anybody takes the religious right serriously so I ignore them. It seems to me that it is always the libs attacking personal freedom and demanding adherence to their ideas whereas cons at least believe in individuality. If the Cons started demanding I go along with their ideas I'd resist them too. I resist the religion of Obama for the same reason I resist Conservative religion, most religion is just nuts. Libs wanna force me to pay for health schemes I do not think will work and I know will bankrupt all of us so I resist that. Likewise I resisted the parts of the patriot act that required librarians to turn over records (eventually overturned). My point in all of this is that for me it is not a matter of Liberal vs Conservative because I am simply not conservative. It IS a matter of freedom vs servitude. I don't believe in roads, bridges or interstate highways. Why should I have to spend my hard-earned money on cement? I demand the government not make me invest in cement. That is under the reasonable taxation. That is what government should be doing. Not inserting themselves in most every facet of our lives. The Fed's now spend about 400% of the what they spent 40 years ago, adjusted for inflation. Lefties who supported Stalin, Mao, Castro, Pol Pot etc in killing a hundred million people I should trust with my life? Lemme see, I should trust my life to a group that wants to shoot protestors? I s'pose that would seem reasonable to the party of Ayers. Oh ****, have you gotten into your wife's oxycontin supply? Did you send the maid out to purchase more? You're gonna need 'em if you expect to continue coming up with highly delusional scenarios. Do you suppose froggy is getting his posting points from ... ClusterFox? |
Libs vs Cons
On Tue, 11 Aug 2009 20:33:31 -0400, H the K
wrote: jps wrote: On Tue, 11 Aug 2009 17:16:49 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch wrote: On Aug 11, 7:25 pm, "Calif Bill" wrote: "jps" wrote in message ... On Tue, 11 Aug 2009 12:11:46 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch wrote: I just dont like being told what to do whether it be by Libs or Cons. Cons are traditionally the party of religion but hardly anybody takes the religious right serriously so I ignore them. It seems to me that it is always the libs attacking personal freedom and demanding adherence to their ideas whereas cons at least believe in individuality. If the Cons started demanding I go along with their ideas I'd resist them too. I resist the religion of Obama for the same reason I resist Conservative religion, most religion is just nuts. Libs wanna force me to pay for health schemes I do not think will work and I know will bankrupt all of us so I resist that. Likewise I resisted the parts of the patriot act that required librarians to turn over records (eventually overturned). My point in all of this is that for me it is not a matter of Liberal vs Conservative because I am simply not conservative. It IS a matter of freedom vs servitude. I don't believe in roads, bridges or interstate highways. Why should I have to spend my hard-earned money on cement? I demand the government not make me invest in cement. That is under the reasonable taxation. That is what government should be doing. Not inserting themselves in most every facet of our lives. The Fed's now spend about 400% of the what they spent 40 years ago, adjusted for inflation. Lefties who supported Stalin, Mao, Castro, Pol Pot etc in killing a hundred million people I should trust with my life? Lemme see, I should trust my life to a group that wants to shoot protestors? I s'pose that would seem reasonable to the party of Ayers. Oh ****, have you gotten into your wife's oxycontin supply? Did you send the maid out to purchase more? You're gonna need 'em if you expect to continue coming up with highly delusional scenarios. Do you suppose froggy is getting his posting points from ... ClusterFox? He has a very inventive imagination. Reminds me of Russel Crowes role in A Beautiful Mind. Suppose Froggie's house has strings that connect everything to everything else? |
Libs vs Cons
On Aug 11, 9:38*pm, wrote:
On Tue, 11 Aug 2009 14:46:44 -0700, jps wrote: On Tue, 11 Aug 2009 12:11:46 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch wrote: I just dont like being told what to do whether it be by Libs or Cons. Cons are traditionally the party of religion but hardly anybody takes the religious right serriously so I ignore them. *It seems to me that it is always the libs attacking personal freedom and demanding adherence to their ideas whereas cons at least believe in individuality. *If the Cons started demanding I go along with their ideas I'd resist them too. *I resist the religion of Obama for the same reason I resist Conservative religion, most religion is just nuts. *Libs wanna force me to pay for health schemes I do not think will work and I know will bankrupt all of us so I resist that. Likewise I resisted the parts of the patriot act that required librarians to turn over records (eventually overturned). My point in all of this is that for me it is not a matter of Liberal vs Conservative because I am simply not conservative. *It IS a matter of freedom vs servitude. I don't believe in roads, bridges or interstate highways. *Why should I have to spend my hard-earned money on cement? I demand the government not make me invest in cement. My problem is I willingly invested my gasoline tax dollars in cement and they took the money and spent it on a subway that doesn't go anywhere I ever want to go. Meanwhile the roads I paid for fell apart. Whoa, jps, that a high compliment. WAIT A MINUTE, what you really mean is that I'm ****ing nuts. |
Libs vs Cons
"jps" wrote in message ... On Tue, 11 Aug 2009 16:25:12 -0700, "Calif Bill" wrote: "jps" wrote in message . .. On Tue, 11 Aug 2009 12:11:46 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch wrote: I just dont like being told what to do whether it be by Libs or Cons. Cons are traditionally the party of religion but hardly anybody takes the religious right serriously so I ignore them. It seems to me that it is always the libs attacking personal freedom and demanding adherence to their ideas whereas cons at least believe in individuality. If the Cons started demanding I go along with their ideas I'd resist them too. I resist the religion of Obama for the same reason I resist Conservative religion, most religion is just nuts. Libs wanna force me to pay for health schemes I do not think will work and I know will bankrupt all of us so I resist that. Likewise I resisted the parts of the patriot act that required librarians to turn over records (eventually overturned). My point in all of this is that for me it is not a matter of Liberal vs Conservative because I am simply not conservative. It IS a matter of freedom vs servitude. I don't believe in roads, bridges or interstate highways. Why should I have to spend my hard-earned money on cement? I demand the government not make me invest in cement. That is under the reasonable taxation. That is what government should be doing. Not inserting themselves in most every facet of our lives. The Fed's now spend about 400% of the what they spent 40 years ago, adjusted for inflation. I DON'T WANT CEMENT, I want blacktop. Cement is too expensive and makes my tires sound like an unmuffled jet engine, therefore causing me hearing loss. And, the Gov't should cover the cost of my hearing loss under medicare but I don't want them in that business. Damn them with their helping the elderly! Asphalt does not stand up to liberal trucks as well. |
Libs vs Cons
On Tue, 11 Aug 2009 19:16:55 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch
wrote: On Aug 11, 9:38*pm, wrote: On Tue, 11 Aug 2009 14:46:44 -0700, jps wrote: On Tue, 11 Aug 2009 12:11:46 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch wrote: I just dont like being told what to do whether it be by Libs or Cons. Cons are traditionally the party of religion but hardly anybody takes the religious right serriously so I ignore them. *It seems to me that it is always the libs attacking personal freedom and demanding adherence to their ideas whereas cons at least believe in individuality. *If the Cons started demanding I go along with their ideas I'd resist them too. *I resist the religion of Obama for the same reason I resist Conservative religion, most religion is just nuts. *Libs wanna force me to pay for health schemes I do not think will work and I know will bankrupt all of us so I resist that. Likewise I resisted the parts of the patriot act that required librarians to turn over records (eventually overturned). My point in all of this is that for me it is not a matter of Liberal vs Conservative because I am simply not conservative. *It IS a matter of freedom vs servitude. I don't believe in roads, bridges or interstate highways. *Why should I have to spend my hard-earned money on cement? I demand the government not make me invest in cement. My problem is I willingly invested my gasoline tax dollars in cement and they took the money and spent it on a subway that doesn't go anywhere I ever want to go. Meanwhile the roads I paid for fell apart. Whoa, jps, that a high compliment. WAIT A MINUTE, what you really mean is that I'm ****ing nuts. I chalk it up to your local water. There's certainly something in it. Seems to affect large sections of Florida so at least you're not alone. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:36 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com