H the K wrote:
Eisboch wrote:
"H the K" wrote in message
...

Y-a-w-n. The incident has become the latest diversionary tactic of
the right, which has no ideas, no plans and no clue about resolving
any of the issues facing this country.





And your yawn and comments have absolutely nothing to do with the
subject being discussed.

Diversionary?

Eisboch


There are divergent views on that incident. The matter is closed. Time
to move on...to the real issues the Republicans like to avoid.

Obama picked the wrong event to broach the subject. And Obama had the
stupidity to admit that he didn't have all the facts when he passed
summary judgment on the police.

BAR wrote:
H the K wrote:
Eisboch wrote:
"H the K" wrote in message
...

Y-a-w-n. The incident has become the latest diversionary tactic of
the right, which has no ideas, no plans and no clue about resolving
any of the issues facing this country.





And your yawn and comments have absolutely nothing to do with the
subject being discussed.

Diversionary?

Eisboch


There are divergent views on that incident. The matter is closed. Time
to move on...to the real issues the Republicans like to avoid.

Obama picked the wrong event to broach the subject. And Obama had the
stupidity to admit that he didn't have all the facts when he passed
summary judgment on the police.



Who has all the facts?

--
Whatever moral rules you have proposed, abide by them as they were laws,
and as if you would be guilty of impiety by violating any of them,
*unless* you are a conservative Republican office holder or minister. If
that is your position in life, then anything goes.

H the K wrote:
BAR wrote:
H the K wrote:
Eisboch wrote:
"H the K" wrote in message
...

Y-a-w-n. The incident has become the latest diversionary tactic of
the right, which has no ideas, no plans and no clue about resolving
any of the issues facing this country.





And your yawn and comments have absolutely nothing to do with the
subject being discussed.

Diversionary?

Eisboch


There are divergent views on that incident. The matter is closed.
Time to move on...to the real issues the Republicans like to avoid.

Obama picked the wrong event to broach the subject. And Obama had the
stupidity to admit that he didn't have all the facts when he passed
summary judgment on the police.



Who has all the facts?


The radio recorder. And, when the tapes are released and Gates is found
to be a ranting and raving lunatic his credibility will fall to zero
with anyone with any modicum of intelligence. But, those with a
political axe to grind will always claim that the police have altered
the tapes.

So, give it your best shot Harry.

BAR wrote:
H the K wrote:
BAR wrote:
H the K wrote:
Eisboch wrote:
"H the K" wrote in message
...

Y-a-w-n. The incident has become the latest diversionary tactic of
the right, which has no ideas, no plans and no clue about
resolving any of the issues facing this country.





And your yawn and comments have absolutely nothing to do with the
subject being discussed.

Diversionary?

Eisboch


There are divergent views on that incident. The matter is closed.
Time to move on...to the real issues the Republicans like to avoid.

Obama picked the wrong event to broach the subject. And Obama had the
stupidity to admit that he didn't have all the facts when he passed
summary judgment on the police.



Who has all the facts?


The radio recorder. And, when the tapes are released and Gates is found
to be a ranting and raving lunatic his credibility will fall to zero
with anyone with any modicum of intelligence. But, those with a
political axe to grind will always claim that the police have altered
the tapes.

So, give it your best shot Harry.


I don't really give a **** about whether the cop insulted the professor
or vice versa. As I stated several days ago, I thought they both acted
like jerks. I also tend not to believe cops when they comment about the
behavior of other cops.

We have real issues in this country, issues you and yours just plain
ignore. The keystone cops episode is just a diversion.


--
Whatever moral rules you have proposed, abide by them as they were laws,
and as if you would be guilty of impiety by violating any of them,
*unless* you are a conservative Republican office holder or minister. If
that is your position in life, then anything goes.

H the K wrote:
BAR wrote:
H the K wrote:
BAR wrote:
H the K wrote:
Eisboch wrote:
"H the K" wrote in message
...

Y-a-w-n. The incident has become the latest diversionary tactic
of the right, which has no ideas, no plans and no clue about
resolving any of the issues facing this country.





And your yawn and comments have absolutely nothing to do with the
subject being discussed.

Diversionary?

Eisboch


There are divergent views on that incident. The matter is closed.
Time to move on...to the real issues the Republicans like to avoid.

Obama picked the wrong event to broach the subject. And Obama had
the stupidity to admit that he didn't have all the facts when he
passed summary judgment on the police.



Who has all the facts?


The radio recorder. And, when the tapes are released and Gates is
found to be a ranting and raving lunatic his credibility will fall to
zero with anyone with any modicum of intelligence. But, those with a
political axe to grind will always claim that the police have altered
the tapes.

So, give it your best shot Harry.


I don't really give a **** about whether the cop insulted the professor
or vice versa. As I stated several days ago, I thought they both acted
like jerks. I also tend not to believe cops when they comment about the
behavior of other cops.

We have real issues in this country, issues you and yours just plain
ignore. The keystone cops episode is just a diversion.

What are those "real issues" in this country that we have to deal with
or worry about. Are we being attacked by those land-locked Afghanis'.

BAR wrote:
H the K wrote:
BAR wrote:
H the K wrote:
BAR wrote:
H the K wrote:
Eisboch wrote:
"H the K" wrote in message
...

Y-a-w-n. The incident has become the latest diversionary tactic
of the right, which has no ideas, no plans and no clue about
resolving any of the issues facing this country.





And your yawn and comments have absolutely nothing to do with the
subject being discussed.

Diversionary?

Eisboch


There are divergent views on that incident. The matter is closed.
Time to move on...to the real issues the Republicans like to avoid.

Obama picked the wrong event to broach the subject. And Obama had
the stupidity to admit that he didn't have all the facts when he
passed summary judgment on the police.



Who has all the facts?


The radio recorder. And, when the tapes are released and Gates is
found to be a ranting and raving lunatic his credibility will fall to
zero with anyone with any modicum of intelligence. But, those with a
political axe to grind will always claim that the police have altered
the tapes.

So, give it your best shot Harry.


I don't really give a **** about whether the cop insulted the
professor or vice versa. As I stated several days ago, I thought they
both acted like jerks. I also tend not to believe cops when they
comment about the behavior of other cops.

We have real issues in this country, issues you and yours just plain
ignore. The keystone cops episode is just a diversion.

What are those "real issues" in this country that we have to deal with
or worry about. Are we being attacked by those land-locked Afghanis'.


snerk



--
Whatever moral rules you have proposed, abide by them as they were laws,
and as if you would be guilty of impiety by violating any of them,
*unless* you are a conservative Republican office holder or minister. If
that is your position in life, then anything goes.

On Jul 27, 5:06*am, H the K wrote:
BAR wrote:
H the K wrote:
BAR wrote:
H the K wrote:
BAR wrote:
H the K wrote:
Eisboch wrote:
"H the K" wrote in message
...

Y-a-w-n. The incident has become the latest diversionary tactic
of the right, which has no ideas, no plans and no clue about
resolving any of the issues facing this country.

And your yawn and comments have absolutely nothing to do with the
subject being discussed.

Diversionary?

Eisboch

There are divergent views on that incident. The matter is closed.
Time to move on...to the real issues the Republicans like to avoid..

Obama picked the wrong event to broach the subject. And Obama had
the stupidity to admit that he didn't have all the facts when he
passed summary judgment on the police.

Who has all the facts?

The radio recorder. And, when the tapes are released and Gates is
found to be a ranting and raving lunatic his credibility will fall to
zero with anyone with any modicum of intelligence. But, those with a
political axe to grind will always claim that the police have altered
the tapes.

So, give it your best shot Harry.

I don't really give a **** about whether the cop insulted the
professor or vice versa. As I stated several days ago, I thought they
both acted like jerks. I also tend not to believe cops when they
comment about the behavior of other cops.

We have real issues in this country, issues you and yours just plain
ignore. The keystone cops episode is just a diversion.

What are those "real issues" in this country that we have to deal with
or worry about. Are we being attacked by those land-locked Afghanis'.

*snerk

Oh come now, Herr Krause.

Surely you can do better than that.

snerk seems to be your only line of defence anymore.

On Sun, 26 Jul 2009 22:51:03 -0400, H the K
wrote:

BAR wrote:
snipped for brevity

So, give it your best shot Harry.


I don't really give a **** about whether the cop insulted the professor
or vice versa. As I stated several days ago, I thought they both acted
like jerks. I also tend not to believe cops when they comment about the
behavior of other cops.

We have real issues in this country, issues you and yours just plain
ignore. The keystone cops episode is just a diversion.

Real issues? Such as government encroachment in the private sector?
Such as government intrusion in our personal lives? Such as the
oppression of the citizenry through taxation? Such as the oppression
of the citizenry by dent of the wealth of legislated behavioral
controls? Such as the weight of fear of the Orwellian hate crime
legislation? Such as the transition of the individual's right of
ownership of property to the individual's privilege to possess
property? Yes, these are serious issues for certain.

--
Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service
-------http://www.NewsDemon.com------
Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access

sniped for corrective action

of the citizenry by dent

"Dent" should be "dint."

--
Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service
-------http://www.NewsDemon.com------
Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access

On Jul 27, 1:57*am, wrote:
sniped for corrective action

of the citizenry by dent

"Dent" should be "dint."

--
Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service
* * * * * * *-------http://www.NewsDemon.com------
Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access

My friend, I believe you had it right the first time.