Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#4
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Wizard of Woodstock wrote:
On Tue, 14 Jul 2009 08:17:53 -0400, H the K wrote: It's always nice when jet jockeys in the military disregard the risks to which they expose civilians with their "show-off" antics. It's no wonder you would have loved to have been there. You didn't read the article - again - did you? It was authorized. Of course it was "authorized." So what? It was still stupid and risky to civilian populations. "It was authorized." What a wonderful, typically military excuse. From an imaginary news story... And the post-crash investigation revealed a part built by the lowest-cost bidder failed at a critical moment, causing the pilot to lose control of the aircraft just before it crashed into an apartment building. Twenty-three men, women and children on the fourth and fifth floor of that apartment building died in the mishap." A spokesperson for the military said the accident was tragic, but noted that "the flight was authorized." Note that I am not saying the military should avoid dangerous flights, or building fly-bys, or whatever. All manner of training is important to military aviators. But there is training and there is stupidity, and flying that close to an apartment building for the purpose of "showing off" is stupidity. If building fly-by training is necessary, it should be done on a relatively deserted part of a military base, or in the desert. You know, where a lot of people aren't exposed to the risk. |