Bozonomics
 

A real milestone under Bozoma, a deficit of one trillion dollars. For
you math challenged Bozoma voters, that is $1,000,000,000,000, or a
million million dollars. If you spent a dollar a second, you would
have money for 31,710 years.

Bozonomics
 

Frogwatch wrote:
A real milestone under Bozoma, a deficit of one trillion dollars. For
you math challenged Bozoma voters, that is $1,000,000,000,000, or a
million million dollars. If you spent a dollar a second, you would
have money for 31,710 years.

And he's projecting it will hit $1.85 trillion before he's done. Then
the tax increases will start. His socialistic redistribution of wealth
will make him a one-term joke.

Spend and tax. WAFM!

Bozonomics
 

Frogwatch wrote:
A real milestone under Bozoma, a deficit of one trillion dollars. For
you math challenged Bozoma voters, that is $1,000,000,000,000, or a
million million dollars. If you spent a dollar a second, you would
have money for 31,710 years.

I don't remember you complaining about Bush's spending. And he did a
lot of reckless spending. One could make a good argument that we are
where we are because of Bush's irresponsible ways, it's undeniable,
except to Obama haters. Everything is Obama's fault.

A one sided way of thinking. Bitch, bitch, bitch, as long as it isn't a
Republican.

Bozonomics
 

Jim wrote:
Frogwatch wrote:
A real milestone under Bozoma, a deficit of one trillion dollars. For
you math challenged Bozoma voters, that is $1,000,000,000,000, or a
million million dollars. If you spent a dollar a second, you would
have money for 31,710 years.

I don't remember you complaining about Bush's spending. And he did a
lot of reckless spending. One could make a good argument that we are
where we are because of Bush's irresponsible ways, it's undeniable,
except to Obama haters. Everything is Obama's fault.

A one sided way of thinking. Bitch, bitch, bitch, as long as it isn't a
Republican.

"And the Bush signed trillion dollar spending bill in the first months
of the current session of congress!" If you will read the information
on line it will tell you that the trillion dollar stimulus bill passed
by the democrats is the cause of the current deficit. So far the
obamination has done nothing but caused a 30% drop in the stock market
after he was sworn in, and caused the loss of thousands of jobs
associated with his version of bailing out the auto industry.

The 30% drop in the stock market was the third time in over 100 years
that occurred when a new president took office. Of the other two,
Wilson had to change what he was trying to do and Carter never realized
that he was doing anything.

President Bush started his administration by successfully lead the
nation through the web recession in 2002 and the significant financial
loss on 9-11. President Bush's deficit while blamed on the war was
principally caused by these two events. There was a third event,
Katrina that affected the deficit that occurred because the officials of
Louisiana did not understand their responsibilities under the States
Rights doctrine.

Bozonomics
 

On Tue, 14 Jul 2009 08:45:02 -0400, Keith Nuttle
wrote:
snipped

President Bush started his administration by successfully lead the
nation through the web recession in 2002 and the significant financial
loss on 9-11. President Bush's deficit while blamed on the war was
principally caused by these two events. There was a third event,
Katrina that affected the deficit that occurred because the officials of
Louisiana did not understand their responsibilities under the States
Rights doctrine.

You left out Barney and Chris.
--

John H

Bozonomics
 

Keith Nuttle wrote:
Jim wrote:
Frogwatch wrote:
A real milestone under Bozoma, a deficit of one trillion dollars. For
you math challenged Bozoma voters, that is $1,000,000,000,000, or a
million million dollars. If you spent a dollar a second, you would
have money for 31,710 years.

I don't remember you complaining about Bush's spending. And he did a
lot of reckless spending. One could make a good argument that we are
where we are because of Bush's irresponsible ways, it's undeniable,
except to Obama haters. Everything is Obama's fault.

A one sided way of thinking. Bitch, bitch, bitch, as long as it isn't
a Republican.

"And the Bush signed trillion dollar spending bill in the first months
of the current session of congress!" If you will read the information
on line it will tell you that the trillion dollar stimulus bill passed
by the democrats is the cause of the current deficit. So far the
obamination has done nothing but caused a 30% drop in the stock market
after he was sworn in, and caused the loss of thousands of jobs
associated with his version of bailing out the auto industry.

The 30% drop in the stock market was the third time in over 100 years
that occurred when a new president took office. Of the other two,
Wilson had to change what he was trying to do and Carter never realized
that he was doing anything.

President Bush started his administration by successfully lead the
nation through the web recession in 2002 and the significant financial
loss on 9-11. President Bush's deficit while blamed on the war was
principally caused by these two events. There was a third event,
Katrina that affected the deficit that occurred because the officials of
Louisiana did not understand their responsibilities under the States
Rights doctrine.

"obamination" says it all. Obama haters always use words like that. To
them Obama can do no right, Bush, no wrong.

Bush headed "socialism for the rich" (and Wall Street in particular.)
Arhue against that.

Please stop it with the *******ization of Obama's name if you want your
opinion considered by others than those who are already in your corner.

Bozonomics
 

On Jul 14, 11:52*am, Jim wrote:
Keith Nuttle wrote:
Jim wrote:
Frogwatch wrote:
A real milestone under Bozoma, a deficit of one trillion dollars. *For
you math challenged Bozoma voters, that is $1,000,000,000,000, or a
million million dollars. *If you spent a dollar a second, you would
have money for 31,710 years.

I don't remember you complaining about Bush's spending. *And he did a
lot of reckless spending. *One could make a good argument that we are
where we are because of Bush's irresponsible ways, it's undeniable,
except to Obama haters. *Everything is Obama's fault.

A one sided way of thinking. *Bitch, bitch, bitch, as long as it isn't
a Republican.

"And the Bush signed trillion dollar spending bill in the first months
of the current session of congress!" *If you will read the information
on line it will tell you that the trillion dollar stimulus bill passed
by the democrats is the cause of the current deficit. *So far the
obamination has done nothing but caused a 30% drop in the stock market
after he was sworn in, and caused the loss of thousands of jobs
associated with his version of bailing out the auto industry.

The 30% drop in the stock market was the third time in over 100 years
that occurred when a new president took office. *Of the other two,
Wilson had to change what he was trying to do and Carter never realized
that he was doing anything.

President Bush started his administration by successfully lead the
nation through the web recession in 2002 and the significant financial
loss on 9-11. President Bush's deficit while blamed on the war was
principally caused by these two events. *There was a third event,
Katrina that affected the deficit that occurred because the officials of
Louisiana did not understand their responsibilities under the States
Rights doctrine.

"obamination" says it all. *Obama haters always use words like that. *To
them Obama can do no right, Bush, no wrong.

Bush headed "socialism for the rich" (and Wall Street in particular.)
Arhue against that.

Please stop it with the *******ization of Obama's name if you want your
opinion considered by others than those who are already in your corner.

I vaguely remember "Bu****ler" and "Chimpzilla" etc with not a peep of
dissent from people like Jim so Bozoma it is. Bozoma's deficit is so
much larger than anything Bush could have imagined that a reasonable
person cannot think of them as being even similar. The Iraq war was
only $789 billion over 7 years while Bozoma has spent that much above
the normal budget in less than 6 months.

Bozonomics
 

On Tue, 14 Jul 2009 08:52:00 -0700, Jim wrote:

Keith Nuttle wrote:
Jim wrote:
Frogwatch wrote:
A real milestone under Bozoma, a deficit of one trillion dollars. For
you math challenged Bozoma voters, that is $1,000,000,000,000, or a
million million dollars. If you spent a dollar a second, you would
have money for 31,710 years.

I don't remember you complaining about Bush's spending. And he did a
lot of reckless spending. One could make a good argument that we are
where we are because of Bush's irresponsible ways, it's undeniable,
except to Obama haters. Everything is Obama's fault.

A one sided way of thinking. Bitch, bitch, bitch, as long as it isn't
a Republican.

"And the Bush signed trillion dollar spending bill in the first months
of the current session of congress!" If you will read the information
on line it will tell you that the trillion dollar stimulus bill passed
by the democrats is the cause of the current deficit. So far the
obamination has done nothing but caused a 30% drop in the stock market
after he was sworn in, and caused the loss of thousands of jobs
associated with his version of bailing out the auto industry.

The 30% drop in the stock market was the third time in over 100 years
that occurred when a new president took office. Of the other two,
Wilson had to change what he was trying to do and Carter never realized
that he was doing anything.

President Bush started his administration by successfully lead the
nation through the web recession in 2002 and the significant financial
loss on 9-11. President Bush's deficit while blamed on the war was
principally caused by these two events. There was a third event,
Katrina that affected the deficit that occurred because the officials of
Louisiana did not understand their responsibilities under the States
Rights doctrine.

"obamination" says it all. Obama haters always use words like that. To
them Obama can do no right, Bush, no wrong.

Bush headed "socialism for the rich" (and Wall Street in particular.)
Arhue against that.

Please stop it with the *******ization of Obama's name if you want your
opinion considered by others than those who are already in your corner.

The Detroit News is probably a Republican owned paper, but it doesn't
seem to think much of Obama's policies either.

Maybe some of you liberals are just hanging on 'cause you don't want
to admit he may have made some boo-boos?
--

John H

Bozonomics
 

Just John Again wrote:
On Tue, 14 Jul 2009 08:52:00 -0700, Jim wrote:

Keith Nuttle wrote:
Jim wrote:
Frogwatch wrote:
A real milestone under Bozoma, a deficit of one trillion dollars. For
you math challenged Bozoma voters, that is $1,000,000,000,000, or a
million million dollars. If you spent a dollar a second, you would
have money for 31,710 years.
I don't remember you complaining about Bush's spending. And he did a
lot of reckless spending. One could make a good argument that we are
where we are because of Bush's irresponsible ways, it's undeniable,
except to Obama haters. Everything is Obama's fault.

A one sided way of thinking. Bitch, bitch, bitch, as long as it isn't
a Republican.
"And the Bush signed trillion dollar spending bill in the first months
of the current session of congress!" If you will read the information
on line it will tell you that the trillion dollar stimulus bill passed
by the democrats is the cause of the current deficit. So far the
obamination has done nothing but caused a 30% drop in the stock market
after he was sworn in, and caused the loss of thousands of jobs
associated with his version of bailing out the auto industry.

The 30% drop in the stock market was the third time in over 100 years
that occurred when a new president took office. Of the other two,
Wilson had to change what he was trying to do and Carter never realized
that he was doing anything.

President Bush started his administration by successfully lead the
nation through the web recession in 2002 and the significant financial
loss on 9-11. President Bush's deficit while blamed on the war was
principally caused by these two events. There was a third event,
Katrina that affected the deficit that occurred because the officials of
Louisiana did not understand their responsibilities under the States
Rights doctrine.
"obamination" says it all. Obama haters always use words like that. To
them Obama can do no right, Bush, no wrong.

Bush headed "socialism for the rich" (and Wall Street in particular.)
Arhue against that.

Please stop it with the *******ization of Obama's name if you want your
opinion considered by others than those who are already in your corner.

The Detroit News is probably a Republican owned paper, but it doesn't
seem to think much of Obama's policies either.

Maybe some of you liberals are just hanging on 'cause you don't want
to admit he may have made some boo-boos?
--

John H

Gee, kind of sounds like the Republicans awhile back.......

Bozonomics
 

On Tue, 14 Jul 2009 14:07:59 -0400, NotNow wrote:

Just John Again wrote:
On Tue, 14 Jul 2009 08:52:00 -0700, Jim wrote:

Keith Nuttle wrote:
Jim wrote:
Frogwatch wrote:
A real milestone under Bozoma, a deficit of one trillion dollars. For
you math challenged Bozoma voters, that is $1,000,000,000,000, or a
million million dollars. If you spent a dollar a second, you would
have money for 31,710 years.
I don't remember you complaining about Bush's spending. And he did a
lot of reckless spending. One could make a good argument that we are
where we are because of Bush's irresponsible ways, it's undeniable,
except to Obama haters. Everything is Obama's fault.

A one sided way of thinking. Bitch, bitch, bitch, as long as it isn't
a Republican.
"And the Bush signed trillion dollar spending bill in the first months
of the current session of congress!" If you will read the information
on line it will tell you that the trillion dollar stimulus bill passed
by the democrats is the cause of the current deficit. So far the
obamination has done nothing but caused a 30% drop in the stock market
after he was sworn in, and caused the loss of thousands of jobs
associated with his version of bailing out the auto industry.

The 30% drop in the stock market was the third time in over 100 years
that occurred when a new president took office. Of the other two,
Wilson had to change what he was trying to do and Carter never realized
that he was doing anything.

President Bush started his administration by successfully lead the
nation through the web recession in 2002 and the significant financial
loss on 9-11. President Bush's deficit while blamed on the war was
principally caused by these two events. There was a third event,
Katrina that affected the deficit that occurred because the officials of
Louisiana did not understand their responsibilities under the States
Rights doctrine.
"obamination" says it all. Obama haters always use words like that. To
them Obama can do no right, Bush, no wrong.

Bush headed "socialism for the rich" (and Wall Street in particular.)
Arhue against that.

Please stop it with the *******ization of Obama's name if you want your
opinion considered by others than those who are already in your corner.

The Detroit News is probably a Republican owned paper, but it doesn't
seem to think much of Obama's policies either.

Maybe some of you liberals are just hanging on 'cause you don't want
to admit he may have made some boo-boos?
--

John H

Gee, kind of sounds like the Republicans awhile back.......

'Awhile back' is history. Does Obama have to act worse than Bush, in
every way, before liberals realize he might have made a boo-boo? That
seems to be the liberal mantra, "Bush did this bad thing, therefore
whatever Obama does is OK."

Bush is gone. He's history. He shouldn't be the justification for
Obama stupidities. I suppose it'll take y'all a long time to realize
that.
--

John H

Bozonomics
 

Just John Again wrote:
On Tue, 14 Jul 2009 14:07:59 -0400, NotNow wrote:

Just John Again wrote:
On Tue, 14 Jul 2009 08:52:00 -0700, Jim wrote:

Keith Nuttle wrote:
Jim wrote:
Frogwatch wrote:
A real milestone under Bozoma, a deficit of one trillion dollars. For
you math challenged Bozoma voters, that is $1,000,000,000,000, or a
million million dollars. If you spent a dollar a second, you would
have money for 31,710 years.
I don't remember you complaining about Bush's spending. And he did a
lot of reckless spending. One could make a good argument that we are
where we are because of Bush's irresponsible ways, it's undeniable,
except to Obama haters. Everything is Obama's fault.

A one sided way of thinking. Bitch, bitch, bitch, as long as it isn't
a Republican.
"And the Bush signed trillion dollar spending bill in the first months
of the current session of congress!" If you will read the information
on line it will tell you that the trillion dollar stimulus bill passed
by the democrats is the cause of the current deficit. So far the
obamination has done nothing but caused a 30% drop in the stock market
after he was sworn in, and caused the loss of thousands of jobs
associated with his version of bailing out the auto industry.

The 30% drop in the stock market was the third time in over 100 years
that occurred when a new president took office. Of the other two,
Wilson had to change what he was trying to do and Carter never realized
that he was doing anything.

President Bush started his administration by successfully lead the
nation through the web recession in 2002 and the significant financial
loss on 9-11. President Bush's deficit while blamed on the war was
principally caused by these two events. There was a third event,
Katrina that affected the deficit that occurred because the officials of
Louisiana did not understand their responsibilities under the States
Rights doctrine.
"obamination" says it all. Obama haters always use words like that. To
them Obama can do no right, Bush, no wrong.

Bush headed "socialism for the rich" (and Wall Street in particular.)
Arhue against that.

Please stop it with the *******ization of Obama's name if you want your
opinion considered by others than those who are already in your corner.
The Detroit News is probably a Republican owned paper, but it doesn't
seem to think much of Obama's policies either.

Maybe some of you liberals are just hanging on 'cause you don't want
to admit he may have made some boo-boos?
--

John H
Gee, kind of sounds like the Republicans awhile back.......

'Awhile back' is history. Does Obama have to act worse than Bush, in
every way, before liberals realize he might have made a boo-boo? That
seems to be the liberal mantra, "Bush did this bad thing, therefore
whatever Obama does is OK."

Oh, so what Obama did five minutes ago is okay now because it's "history"?

Bush is gone. He's history. He shouldn't be the justification for
Obama stupidities. I suppose it'll take y'all a long time to realize
that.
--

I never said that the failures of Bush is justification for anything. I
simply said that awhile back, it was the conservatives who never ever
would admit to any mistakes Bush made.

Bozonomics
 

On Tue, 14 Jul 2009 15:42:37 -0400, NotNow wrote:

Just John Again wrote:
On Tue, 14 Jul 2009 14:07:59 -0400, NotNow wrote:

Just John Again wrote:
On Tue, 14 Jul 2009 08:52:00 -0700, Jim wrote:

Keith Nuttle wrote:
Jim wrote:
Frogwatch wrote:
A real milestone under Bozoma, a deficit of one trillion dollars. For
you math challenged Bozoma voters, that is $1,000,000,000,000, or a
million million dollars. If you spent a dollar a second, you would
have money for 31,710 years.
I don't remember you complaining about Bush's spending. And he did a
lot of reckless spending. One could make a good argument that we are
where we are because of Bush's irresponsible ways, it's undeniable,
except to Obama haters. Everything is Obama's fault.

A one sided way of thinking. Bitch, bitch, bitch, as long as it isn't
a Republican.
"And the Bush signed trillion dollar spending bill in the first months
of the current session of congress!" If you will read the information
on line it will tell you that the trillion dollar stimulus bill passed
by the democrats is the cause of the current deficit. So far the
obamination has done nothing but caused a 30% drop in the stock market
after he was sworn in, and caused the loss of thousands of jobs
associated with his version of bailing out the auto industry.

The 30% drop in the stock market was the third time in over 100 years
that occurred when a new president took office. Of the other two,
Wilson had to change what he was trying to do and Carter never realized
that he was doing anything.

President Bush started his administration by successfully lead the
nation through the web recession in 2002 and the significant financial
loss on 9-11. President Bush's deficit while blamed on the war was
principally caused by these two events. There was a third event,
Katrina that affected the deficit that occurred because the officials of
Louisiana did not understand their responsibilities under the States
Rights doctrine.
"obamination" says it all. Obama haters always use words like that. To
them Obama can do no right, Bush, no wrong.

Bush headed "socialism for the rich" (and Wall Street in particular.)
Arhue against that.

Please stop it with the *******ization of Obama's name if you want your
opinion considered by others than those who are already in your corner.
The Detroit News is probably a Republican owned paper, but it doesn't
seem to think much of Obama's policies either.

Maybe some of you liberals are just hanging on 'cause you don't want
to admit he may have made some boo-boos?
--

John H
Gee, kind of sounds like the Republicans awhile back.......

'Awhile back' is history. Does Obama have to act worse than Bush, in
every way, before liberals realize he might have made a boo-boo? That
seems to be the liberal mantra, "Bush did this bad thing, therefore
whatever Obama does is OK."

Oh, so what Obama did five minutes ago is okay now because it's "history"?


I said nothing about the correctness of Bush's actions.


Bush is gone. He's history. He shouldn't be the justification for
Obama stupidities. I suppose it'll take y'all a long time to realize
that.
--

I never said that the failures of Bush is justification for anything. I
simply said that awhile back, it was the conservatives who never ever
would admit to any mistakes Bush made.

That statement is bull****, and, more importantly, it has no bearing
on the actions of Obama.


--

John H

Bozonomics
 

Just John Again wrote:
On Tue, 14 Jul 2009 15:42:37 -0400, NotNow wrote:

Just John Again wrote:
On Tue, 14 Jul 2009 14:07:59 -0400, NotNow wrote:

Just John Again wrote:
On Tue, 14 Jul 2009 08:52:00 -0700, Jim wrote:

Keith Nuttle wrote:
Jim wrote:
Frogwatch wrote:
A real milestone under Bozoma, a deficit of one trillion dollars. For
you math challenged Bozoma voters, that is $1,000,000,000,000, or a
million million dollars. If you spent a dollar a second, you would
have money for 31,710 years.
I don't remember you complaining about Bush's spending. And he did a
lot of reckless spending. One could make a good argument that we are
where we are because of Bush's irresponsible ways, it's undeniable,
except to Obama haters. Everything is Obama's fault.

A one sided way of thinking. Bitch, bitch, bitch, as long as it isn't
a Republican.
"And the Bush signed trillion dollar spending bill in the first months
of the current session of congress!" If you will read the information
on line it will tell you that the trillion dollar stimulus bill passed
by the democrats is the cause of the current deficit. So far the
obamination has done nothing but caused a 30% drop in the stock market
after he was sworn in, and caused the loss of thousands of jobs
associated with his version of bailing out the auto industry.

The 30% drop in the stock market was the third time in over 100 years
that occurred when a new president took office. Of the other two,
Wilson had to change what he was trying to do and Carter never realized
that he was doing anything.

President Bush started his administration by successfully lead the
nation through the web recession in 2002 and the significant financial
loss on 9-11. President Bush's deficit while blamed on the war was
principally caused by these two events. There was a third event,
Katrina that affected the deficit that occurred because the officials of
Louisiana did not understand their responsibilities under the States
Rights doctrine.
"obamination" says it all. Obama haters always use words like that. To
them Obama can do no right, Bush, no wrong.

Bush headed "socialism for the rich" (and Wall Street in particular.)
Arhue against that.

Please stop it with the *******ization of Obama's name if you want your
opinion considered by others than those who are already in your corner.
The Detroit News is probably a Republican owned paper, but it doesn't
seem to think much of Obama's policies either.

Maybe some of you liberals are just hanging on 'cause you don't want
to admit he may have made some boo-boos?
--

John H
Gee, kind of sounds like the Republicans awhile back.......
'Awhile back' is history. Does Obama have to act worse than Bush, in
every way, before liberals realize he might have made a boo-boo? That
seems to be the liberal mantra, "Bush did this bad thing, therefore
whatever Obama does is OK."
Oh, so what Obama did five minutes ago is okay now because it's "history"?

I said nothing about the correctness of Bush's actions.


Bush is gone. He's history. He shouldn't be the justification for
Obama stupidities. I suppose it'll take y'all a long time to realize
that.
--

I never said that the failures of Bush is justification for anything. I
simply said that awhile back, it was the conservatives who never ever
would admit to any mistakes Bush made.

That statement is bull****, and, more importantly, it has no bearing
on the actions of Obama.


--

John H

What's bull**** about it? Show me where I EVER said that Bush's failures
were justification for anything, as you have accused me of.

Bozonomics
 

NotNow wrote:
Just John Again wrote:
On Tue, 14 Jul 2009 15:42:37 -0400, NotNow wrote:

Just John Again wrote:
On Tue, 14 Jul 2009 14:07:59 -0400, NotNow wrote:

Just John Again wrote:
On Tue, 14 Jul 2009 08:52:00 -0700, Jim wrote:

Keith Nuttle wrote:
Jim wrote:
Frogwatch wrote:
A real milestone under Bozoma, a deficit of one trillion
dollars. For
you math challenged Bozoma voters, that is $1,000,000,000,000,
or a
million million dollars. If you spent a dollar a second, you
would
have money for 31,710 years.
I don't remember you complaining about Bush's spending. And he
did a lot of reckless spending. One could make a good argument
that we are where we are because of Bush's irresponsible ways,
it's undeniable, except to Obama haters. Everything is Obama's
fault.

A one sided way of thinking. Bitch, bitch, bitch, as long as
it isn't a Republican.
"And the Bush signed trillion dollar spending bill in the first
months of the current session of congress!" If you will read
the information on line it will tell you that the trillion
dollar stimulus bill passed by the democrats is the cause of the
current deficit. So far the obamination has done nothing but
caused a 30% drop in the stock market after he was sworn in, and
caused the loss of thousands of jobs associated with his version
of bailing out the auto industry.

The 30% drop in the stock market was the third time in over 100
years that occurred when a new president took office. Of the
other two, Wilson had to change what he was trying to do and
Carter never realized that he was doing anything.

President Bush started his administration by successfully lead
the nation through the web recession in 2002 and the significant
financial loss on 9-11. President Bush's deficit while blamed on
the war was principally caused by these two events. There was a
third event, Katrina that affected the deficit that occurred
because the officials of Louisiana did not understand their
responsibilities under the States Rights doctrine.
"obamination" says it all. Obama haters always use words like
that. To them Obama can do no right, Bush, no wrong.

Bush headed "socialism for the rich" (and Wall Street in
particular.) Arhue against that.

Please stop it with the *******ization of Obama's name if you
want your opinion considered by others than those who are already
in your corner.
The Detroit News is probably a Republican owned paper, but it doesn't
seem to think much of Obama's policies either.

Maybe some of you liberals are just hanging on 'cause you don't want
to admit he may have made some boo-boos?
--

John H
Gee, kind of sounds like the Republicans awhile back.......
'Awhile back' is history. Does Obama have to act worse than Bush, in
every way, before liberals realize he might have made a boo-boo? That
seems to be the liberal mantra, "Bush did this bad thing, therefore
whatever Obama does is OK."
Oh, so what Obama did five minutes ago is okay now because it's
"history"?

I said nothing about the correctness of Bush's actions.

Bush is gone. He's history. He shouldn't be the justification for
Obama stupidities. I suppose it'll take y'all a long time to realize
that.
--

I never said that the failures of Bush is justification for anything.
I simply said that awhile back, it was the conservatives who never
ever would admit to any mistakes Bush made.

That statement is bull****, and, more importantly, it has no bearing
on the actions of Obama.

--

John H

What's bull**** about it? Show me where I EVER said that Bush's failures
were justification for anything, as you have accused me of.

Hey, I just did a "harry" on your comments and right there in the middle
of your post were the words:

Bush's failures were justification.."

It was very clear, you said it...;)

See above snerk