|
More good news for America
The NY Post is run by Rupert Murdoch to further his conservative agenda. It loses $50 million a year. The Washington Times is run by Rev. Sun Myung Moon to further his conservative agenda. By some estimates Rev. Moon has sunk $2 to $3 billion into it and it has never been profitable. The Pittsburgh Tribune-Review is run by Richard Mellon Scaife to further his conservative agenda. It loses $20 to $30 million a year. The Weekly Standard used to be owned by Murdoch to further his conservative agenda but is now owned by Philip Anschutz to further his conservative agenda. Either way, it loses $5 million a year. Swiped from KOS |
More good news for America
"HK" wrote in message m... The NY Post is run by Rupert Murdoch to further his conservative agenda. It loses $50 million a year. The Washington Times is run by Rev. Sun Myung Moon to further his conservative agenda. By some estimates Rev. Moon has sunk $2 to $3 billion into it and it has never been profitable. The Pittsburgh Tribune-Review is run by Richard Mellon Scaife to further his conservative agenda. It loses $20 to $30 million a year. The Weekly Standard used to be owned by Murdoch to further his conservative agenda but is now owned by Philip Anschutz to further his conservative agenda. Either way, it loses $5 million a year. Swiped from KOS And the New York Times (liberal is its middle name) is on the verge of bankruptcy. Tell it all or don't tell it at all. Swiped from www.Breitbart.com at http://www.breitbart.com/article.php...ow_article= 1 The New York Times Co. reported a steep drop in third-quarter profits on Thursday, the latest gloomy earnings report in an industry battered by online competition and falling print advertising revenue. The New York Times Co. said net profit fell by 51.4 percent in the third quarter to 6.5 million dollars, or five cents per share, from 13.4 million dollars, or nine cents per share, in the same period a year ago. The company, which owns About.com, The Boston Globe, International Herald Tribune and 16 other daily newspapers besides the flagship The New York Times, said overall advertising revenue fell by 14.4 percent during the quarter. Shortly after the release of its results, Standard & Poors said it was lowering the Times's credit rating to "BB-," or junk status, while Moody's Investors Service said it was placing it on review for possible downgrade. |
More good news for America
Lu Powell wrote:
"HK" wrote in message m... The NY Post is run by Rupert Murdoch to further his conservative agenda. It loses $50 million a year. The Washington Times is run by Rev. Sun Myung Moon to further his conservative agenda. By some estimates Rev. Moon has sunk $2 to $3 billion into it and it has never been profitable. The Pittsburgh Tribune-Review is run by Richard Mellon Scaife to further his conservative agenda. It loses $20 to $30 million a year. The Weekly Standard used to be owned by Murdoch to further his conservative agenda but is now owned by Philip Anschutz to further his conservative agenda. Either way, it loses $5 million a year. Swiped from KOS And the New York Times (liberal is its middle name) is on the verge of bankruptcy. Tell it all or don't tell it at all. Swiped from www.Breitbart.com at http://www.breitbart.com/article.php...ow_article= 1 The New York Times Co. reported a steep drop in third-quarter profits on Thursday, the latest gloomy earnings report in an industry battered by online competition and falling print advertising revenue. The New York Times Co. said net profit fell by 51.4 percent in the third quarter to 6.5 million dollars, or five cents per share, from 13.4 million dollars, or nine cents per share, in the same period a year ago. The company, which owns About.com, The Boston Globe, International Herald Tribune and 16 other daily newspapers besides the flagship The New York Times, said overall advertising revenue fell by 14.4 percent during the quarter. Shortly after the release of its results, Standard & Poors said it was lowering the Times's credit rating to "BB-," or junk status, while Moody's Investors Service said it was placing it on review for possible downgrade. Whoosh. It's not about losing revenue. Most newspapers are hurting because of the shifts in media habits. The rags I mentioned are operated to further an individual's political agenda. The NY Times, a moderate-to-mildly liberal newspaper, is not. It isn't owned by an individual, as are the NY Post, the Wash Times, or the Trib-Review. Got it, Lu? Probably not. |
More good news for America
On Wed, 1 Jul 2009 16:36:13 -0400, "Lu Powell"
wrote: "HK" wrote in message om... The NY Post is run by Rupert Murdoch to further his conservative agenda. It loses $50 million a year. The Washington Times is run by Rev. Sun Myung Moon to further his conservative agenda. By some estimates Rev. Moon has sunk $2 to $3 billion into it and it has never been profitable. The Pittsburgh Tribune-Review is run by Richard Mellon Scaife to further his conservative agenda. It loses $20 to $30 million a year. The Weekly Standard used to be owned by Murdoch to further his conservative agenda but is now owned by Philip Anschutz to further his conservative agenda. Either way, it loses $5 million a year. Swiped from KOS And the New York Times (liberal is its middle name) is on the verge of bankruptcy. Tell it all or don't tell it at all. Swiped from www.Breitbart.com at http://www.breitbart.com/article.php...ow_article= 1 The New York Times Co. reported a steep drop in third-quarter profits on Thursday, the latest gloomy earnings report in an industry battered by online competition and falling print advertising revenue. The New York Times Co. said net profit fell by 51.4 percent in the third quarter to 6.5 million dollars, or five cents per share, from 13.4 million dollars, or nine cents per share, in the same period a year ago. The company, which owns About.com, The Boston Globe, International Herald Tribune and 16 other daily newspapers besides the flagship The New York Times, said overall advertising revenue fell by 14.4 percent during the quarter. Shortly after the release of its results, Standard & Poors said it was lowering the Times's credit rating to "BB-," or junk status, while Moody's Investors Service said it was placing it on review for possible downgrade. What's this bit about the NY Times turning a net profit? Something the three conservatives are lacking. Selling liberalism must be far more profitable. Why aren't the conservatives in that business? |
More good news for America
jps wrote:
On Wed, 1 Jul 2009 16:36:13 -0400, "Lu Powell" wrote: "HK" wrote in message m... The NY Post is run by Rupert Murdoch to further his conservative agenda. It loses $50 million a year. The Washington Times is run by Rev. Sun Myung Moon to further his conservative agenda. By some estimates Rev. Moon has sunk $2 to $3 billion into it and it has never been profitable. The Pittsburgh Tribune-Review is run by Richard Mellon Scaife to further his conservative agenda. It loses $20 to $30 million a year. The Weekly Standard used to be owned by Murdoch to further his conservative agenda but is now owned by Philip Anschutz to further his conservative agenda. Either way, it loses $5 million a year. Swiped from KOS And the New York Times (liberal is its middle name) is on the verge of bankruptcy. Tell it all or don't tell it at all. Swiped from www.Breitbart.com at http://www.breitbart.com/article.php...ow_article= 1 The New York Times Co. reported a steep drop in third-quarter profits on Thursday, the latest gloomy earnings report in an industry battered by online competition and falling print advertising revenue. The New York Times Co. said net profit fell by 51.4 percent in the third quarter to 6.5 million dollars, or five cents per share, from 13.4 million dollars, or nine cents per share, in the same period a year ago. The company, which owns About.com, The Boston Globe, International Herald Tribune and 16 other daily newspapers besides the flagship The New York Times, said overall advertising revenue fell by 14.4 percent during the quarter. Shortly after the release of its results, Standard & Poors said it was lowering the Times's credit rating to "BB-," or junk status, while Moody's Investors Service said it was placing it on review for possible downgrade. What's this bit about the NY Times turning a net profit? Something the three conservatives are lacking. Selling liberalism must be far more profitable. Why aren't the conservatives in that business? Well, they do have the Fake News Network and, of course, WorldNutCaseDaily. |
More good news for America
On Jul 1, 4:48*pm, jps wrote:
On Wed, 1 Jul 2009 16:36:13 -0400, "Lu Powell" wrote: "HK" wrote in message om... The NY Post is run by Rupert Murdoch to further his conservative agenda. It loses $50 million a year. The Washington Times is run by Rev. Sun Myung Moon to further his conservative agenda. By some estimates Rev. Moon has sunk $2 to $3 billion into it and it has never been profitable. The Pittsburgh Tribune-Review is run by Richard Mellon Scaife to further his conservative agenda. It loses $20 to $30 million a year. The Weekly Standard used to be owned by Murdoch to further his conservative agenda but is now owned by Philip Anschutz to further his conservative agenda. Either way, it loses $5 million a year. Swiped from KOS And the New York Times (liberal is its middle name) is on the verge of bankruptcy. Tell it all or don't tell it at all. Swiped fromwww.Breitbart.com*at http://www.breitbart.com/article.php...7uwdxs&show_ar.... The New York Times Co. reported a steep drop in third-quarter profits on Thursday, the latest gloomy earnings report in an industry battered by online competition and falling print advertising revenue. The New York Times Co. said net profit fell by 51.4 percent in the third quarter to 6.5 million dollars, or five cents per share, from 13.4 million dollars, or nine cents per share, in the same period a year ago. The company, which owns About.com, The Boston Globe, International Herald Tribune and 16 other daily newspapers besides the flagship The New York Times, said overall advertising revenue fell by 14.4 percent during the quarter. Shortly after the release of its results, Standard & Poors said it was lowering the Times's credit rating to "BB-," or junk status, while Moody's Investors Service said it was placing it on review for possible downgrade. What's this bit about the NY Times turning *a net profit? * Something the three conservatives are lacking. Selling liberalism must be far more profitable. *Why aren't the conservatives in that business?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Fiction sells... The New York Lies is well known for making it up as they go along.. What a waste of resources.. |
More good news for America
HK wrote:
Lu Powell wrote: "HK" wrote in message m... The NY Post is run by Rupert Murdoch to further his conservative agenda. It loses $50 million a year. snip Whoosh. It's not about losing revenue. Most newspapers are hurting because of the shifts in media habits. The rags I mentioned are operated to further an individual's political agenda. The NY Times, a moderate-to-mildly liberal newspaper, is not. It isn't owned by an individual, as are the NY Post, the Wash Times, or the Trib-Review. Got it, Lu? Probably not. If you talking all media, I believe the most listened talk show is Russ Limbaugh, a strong conservative. Someone the obama would love to shut down as people look to Russ to keep them informed of what the liberals re up to. |
More good news for America
JustWaitAFrekinMinute! wrote:
On Jul 1, 4:48 pm, jps wrote: On Wed, 1 Jul 2009 16:36:13 -0400, "Lu Powell" wrote: "HK" wrote in message m... The NY Post is run by Rupert Murdoch to further his conservative agenda. It loses $50 million a year. The Washington Times is run by Rev. Sun Myung Moon to further his conservative agenda. By some estimates Rev. Moon has sunk $2 to $3 billion into it and it has never been profitable. The Pittsburgh Tribune-Review is run by Richard Mellon Scaife to further his conservative agenda. It loses $20 to $30 million a year. The Weekly Standard used to be owned by Murdoch to further his conservative agenda but is now owned by Philip Anschutz to further his conservative agenda. Either way, it loses $5 million a year. Swiped from KOS And the New York Times (liberal is its middle name) is on the verge of bankruptcy. Tell it all or don't tell it at all. Swiped fromwww.Breitbart.com at http://www.breitbart.com/article.php...7uwdxs&show_ar... The New York Times Co. reported a steep drop in third-quarter profits on Thursday, the latest gloomy earnings report in an industry battered by online competition and falling print advertising revenue. The New York Times Co. said net profit fell by 51.4 percent in the third quarter to 6.5 million dollars, or five cents per share, from 13.4 million dollars, or nine cents per share, in the same period a year ago. The company, which owns About.com, The Boston Globe, International Herald Tribune and 16 other daily newspapers besides the flagship The New York Times, said overall advertising revenue fell by 14.4 percent during the quarter. Shortly after the release of its results, Standard & Poors said it was lowering the Times's credit rating to "BB-," or junk status, while Moody's Investors Service said it was placing it on review for possible downgrade. What's this bit about the NY Times turning a net profit? Something the three conservatives are lacking. Selling liberalism must be far more profitable. Why aren't the conservatives in that business?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Fiction sells... The New York Lies is well known for making it up as they go along.. What a waste of resources.. Uh...no one asked for the opinion of an uninformed, uneducated, ignorant, and hopelessly stupid idiot like you. Swinburne, no doubt, had one of your ancestors in mind when he wrote in Testaments: "An Idiote, or a naturall foole is he, who notwithstanding he bee of lawfull age, yet he is so witlesse, that hee can not number to twentie, nor can tell what age he is of, nor knoweth who is his father, or mother, nor is able to answer to any such easie question." You know, like "built any boats lately?" |
More good news for America
Keith Nuttle wrote:
HK wrote: Lu Powell wrote: "HK" wrote in message m... The NY Post is run by Rupert Murdoch to further his conservative agenda. It loses $50 million a year. snip Whoosh. It's not about losing revenue. Most newspapers are hurting because of the shifts in media habits. The rags I mentioned are operated to further an individual's political agenda. The NY Times, a moderate-to-mildly liberal newspaper, is not. It isn't owned by an individual, as are the NY Post, the Wash Times, or the Trib-Review. Got it, Lu? Probably not. If you talking all media, I believe the most listened talk show is Russ Limbaugh, a strong conservative. Someone the obama would love to shut down as people look to Russ to keep them informed of what the liberals re up to. Only absolute idiots depend upon Limbaugh to stay informed, and they vote for Republicans or klansmen. In other words, Limbaugh reaches the audience of losers. Like you. |
More good news for America
"HK" wrote in message m... Lu Powell wrote: "HK" wrote in message m... The NY Post is run by Rupert Murdoch to further his conservative agenda. It loses $50 million a year. The Washington Times is run by Rev. Sun Myung Moon to further his conservative agenda. By some estimates Rev. Moon has sunk $2 to $3 billion into it and it has never been profitable. The Pittsburgh Tribune-Review is run by Richard Mellon Scaife to further his conservative agenda. It loses $20 to $30 million a year. The Weekly Standard used to be owned by Murdoch to further his conservative agenda but is now owned by Philip Anschutz to further his conservative agenda. Either way, it loses $5 million a year. Swiped from KOS And the New York Times (liberal is its middle name) is on the verge of bankruptcy. Tell it all or don't tell it at all. Swiped from www.Breitbart.com at http://www.breitbart.com/article.php...ow_article= 1 The New York Times Co. reported a steep drop in third-quarter profits on Thursday, the latest gloomy earnings report in an industry battered by online competition and falling print advertising revenue. The New York Times Co. said net profit fell by 51.4 percent in the third quarter to 6.5 million dollars, or five cents per share, from 13.4 million dollars, or nine cents per share, in the same period a year ago. The company, which owns About.com, The Boston Globe, International Herald Tribune and 16 other daily newspapers besides the flagship The New York Times, said overall advertising revenue fell by 14.4 percent during the quarter. Shortly after the release of its results, Standard & Poors said it was lowering the Times's credit rating to "BB-," or junk status, while Moody's Investors Service said it was placing it on review for possible downgrade. Whoosh. It's not about losing revenue. Most newspapers are hurting because of the shifts in media habits. The rags I mentioned are operated to further an individual's political agenda. The NY Times, a moderate-to-mildly liberal newspaper, is not. It isn't owned by an individual, as are the NY Post, the Wash Times, or the Trib-Review. Got it, Lu? Probably not. I do get the difference. KOS is not exactly the most objective source for anything. Its existence is due in part to the largesse of a billionaire with his own agenda. That sort of makes KOS a rag like the ones you slammed. As I said, tell it all or don't tell it at all. Relax. Have some fun. Go boating. Show your wife how lucky she is to have a man like you. |
More good news for America
"HK" wrote in message ... JustWaitAFrekinMinute! wrote: On Jul 1, 4:48 pm, jps wrote: On Wed, 1 Jul 2009 16:36:13 -0400, "Lu Powell" wrote: "HK" wrote in message m... The NY Post is run by Rupert Murdoch to further his conservative agenda. It loses $50 million a year. The Washington Times is run by Rev. Sun Myung Moon to further his conservative agenda. By some estimates Rev. Moon has sunk $2 to $3 billion into it and it has never been profitable. The Pittsburgh Tribune-Review is run by Richard Mellon Scaife to further his conservative agenda. It loses $20 to $30 million a year. The Weekly Standard used to be owned by Murdoch to further his conservative agenda but is now owned by Philip Anschutz to further his conservative agenda. Either way, it loses $5 million a year. Swiped from KOS And the New York Times (liberal is its middle name) is on the verge of bankruptcy. Tell it all or don't tell it at all. Swiped fromwww.Breitbart.com at http://www.breitbart.com/article.php...7uwdxs&show_ar... The New York Times Co. reported a steep drop in third-quarter profits on Thursday, the latest gloomy earnings report in an industry battered by online competition and falling print advertising revenue. The New York Times Co. said net profit fell by 51.4 percent in the third quarter to 6.5 million dollars, or five cents per share, from 13.4 million dollars, or nine cents per share, in the same period a year ago. The company, which owns About.com, The Boston Globe, International Herald Tribune and 16 other daily newspapers besides the flagship The New York Times, said overall advertising revenue fell by 14.4 percent during the quarter. Shortly after the release of its results, Standard & Poors said it was lowering the Times's credit rating to "BB-," or junk status, while Moody's Investors Service said it was placing it on review for possible downgrade. What's this bit about the NY Times turning a net profit? Something the three conservatives are lacking. Selling liberalism must be far more profitable. Why aren't the conservatives in that business?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Fiction sells... The New York Lies is well known for making it up as they go along.. What a waste of resources.. Uh...no one asked for the opinion of an uninformed, uneducated, ignorant, and hopelessly stupid idiot like you. Swinburne, no doubt, had one of your ancestors in mind when he wrote in Testaments: "An Idiote, or a naturall foole is he, who notwithstanding he bee of lawfull age, yet he is so witlesse, that hee can not number to twentie, nor can tell what age he is of, nor knoweth who is his father, or mother, nor is able to answer to any such easie question." You know, like "built any boats lately?" Attacking the messenger, ignoring the valid message. |
More good news for America
Lu Powell wrote:
"HK" wrote in message m... Lu Powell wrote: "HK" wrote in message m... The NY Post is run by Rupert Murdoch to further his conservative agenda. It loses $50 million a year. The Washington Times is run by Rev. Sun Myung Moon to further his conservative agenda. By some estimates Rev. Moon has sunk $2 to $3 billion into it and it has never been profitable. The Pittsburgh Tribune-Review is run by Richard Mellon Scaife to further his conservative agenda. It loses $20 to $30 million a year. The Weekly Standard used to be owned by Murdoch to further his conservative agenda but is now owned by Philip Anschutz to further his conservative agenda. Either way, it loses $5 million a year. Swiped from KOS And the New York Times (liberal is its middle name) is on the verge of bankruptcy. Tell it all or don't tell it at all. Swiped from www.Breitbart.com at http://www.breitbart.com/article.php...ow_article= 1 The New York Times Co. reported a steep drop in third-quarter profits on Thursday, the latest gloomy earnings report in an industry battered by online competition and falling print advertising revenue. The New York Times Co. said net profit fell by 51.4 percent in the third quarter to 6.5 million dollars, or five cents per share, from 13.4 million dollars, or nine cents per share, in the same period a year ago. The company, which owns About.com, The Boston Globe, International Herald Tribune and 16 other daily newspapers besides the flagship The New York Times, said overall advertising revenue fell by 14.4 percent during the quarter. Shortly after the release of its results, Standard & Poors said it was lowering the Times's credit rating to "BB-," or junk status, while Moody's Investors Service said it was placing it on review for possible downgrade. Whoosh. It's not about losing revenue. Most newspapers are hurting because of the shifts in media habits. The rags I mentioned are operated to further an individual's political agenda. The NY Times, a moderate-to-mildly liberal newspaper, is not. It isn't owned by an individual, as are the NY Post, the Wash Times, or the Trib-Review. Got it, Lu? Probably not. I do get the difference. KOS is not exactly the most objective source for anything. Its existence is due in part to the largesse of a billionaire with his own agenda. That sort of makes KOS a rag like the ones you slammed. As I said, tell it all or don't tell it at all. Relax. Have some fun. Go boating. Show your wife how lucky she is to have a man like you. KOS doesn't pretend to be a newspaper. It is an opinion site. It does have writers who present factually based articles, and it does "reprint" factual news from other sites. Faux News, the NY Post, the Wash Times, et cetera, are nothing more than the personal rags and playthings of their owners. The Wash Times is owned and operated by the Loonie Moonies, and is run as an adjunct to their political and religious agenda. |
More good news for America
Lu Powell wrote:
"HK" wrote in message ... JustWaitAFrekinMinute! wrote: On Jul 1, 4:48 pm, jps wrote: On Wed, 1 Jul 2009 16:36:13 -0400, "Lu Powell" wrote: "HK" wrote in message m... The NY Post is run by Rupert Murdoch to further his conservative agenda. It loses $50 million a year. The Washington Times is run by Rev. Sun Myung Moon to further his conservative agenda. By some estimates Rev. Moon has sunk $2 to $3 billion into it and it has never been profitable. The Pittsburgh Tribune-Review is run by Richard Mellon Scaife to further his conservative agenda. It loses $20 to $30 million a year. The Weekly Standard used to be owned by Murdoch to further his conservative agenda but is now owned by Philip Anschutz to further his conservative agenda. Either way, it loses $5 million a year. Swiped from KOS And the New York Times (liberal is its middle name) is on the verge of bankruptcy. Tell it all or don't tell it at all. Swiped fromwww.Breitbart.com at http://www.breitbart.com/article.php...7uwdxs&show_ar... The New York Times Co. reported a steep drop in third-quarter profits on Thursday, the latest gloomy earnings report in an industry battered by online competition and falling print advertising revenue. The New York Times Co. said net profit fell by 51.4 percent in the third quarter to 6.5 million dollars, or five cents per share, from 13.4 million dollars, or nine cents per share, in the same period a year ago. The company, which owns About.com, The Boston Globe, International Herald Tribune and 16 other daily newspapers besides the flagship The New York Times, said overall advertising revenue fell by 14.4 percent during the quarter. Shortly after the release of its results, Standard & Poors said it was lowering the Times's credit rating to "BB-," or junk status, while Moody's Investors Service said it was placing it on review for possible downgrade. What's this bit about the NY Times turning a net profit? Something the three conservatives are lacking. Selling liberalism must be far more profitable. Why aren't the conservatives in that business?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Fiction sells... The New York Lies is well known for making it up as they go along.. What a waste of resources.. Uh...no one asked for the opinion of an uninformed, uneducated, ignorant, and hopelessly stupid idiot like you. Swinburne, no doubt, had one of your ancestors in mind when he wrote in Testaments: "An Idiote, or a naturall foole is he, who notwithstanding he bee of lawfull age, yet he is so witlesse, that hee can not number to twentie, nor can tell what age he is of, nor knoweth who is his father, or mother, nor is able to answer to any such easie question." You know, like "built any boats lately?" Attacking the messenger, ignoring the valid message. In justhate's case, the messenger and the message are identical...uninformed idiocy. |
More good news for America
On Wed, 01 Jul 2009 16:55:51 -0400, Keith Nuttle
wrote: HK wrote: Lu Powell wrote: "HK" wrote in message m... The NY Post is run by Rupert Murdoch to further his conservative agenda. It loses $50 million a year. snip Whoosh. It's not about losing revenue. Most newspapers are hurting because of the shifts in media habits. The rags I mentioned are operated to further an individual's political agenda. The NY Times, a moderate-to-mildly liberal newspaper, is not. It isn't owned by an individual, as are the NY Post, the Wash Times, or the Trib-Review. Got it, Lu? Probably not. If you talking all media, I believe the most listened talk show is Russ Limbaugh, a strong conservative. Someone the obama would love to shut down as people look to Russ to keep them informed of what the liberals re up to. Oy. |
More good news for America
jps wrote:
On Wed, 01 Jul 2009 16:55:51 -0400, Keith Nuttle wrote: HK wrote: Lu Powell wrote: "HK" wrote in message m... The NY Post is run by Rupert Murdoch to further his conservative agenda. It loses $50 million a year. snip Whoosh. It's not about losing revenue. Most newspapers are hurting because of the shifts in media habits. The rags I mentioned are operated to further an individual's political agenda. The NY Times, a moderate-to-mildly liberal newspaper, is not. It isn't owned by an individual, as are the NY Post, the Wash Times, or the Trib-Review. Got it, Lu? Probably not. If you talking all media, I believe the most listened talk show is Russ Limbaugh, a strong conservative. Someone the obama would love to shut down as people look to Russ to keep them informed of what the liberals re up to. Oy. "Russ" Limbaugh...his fans still can't spell his name after all these years. |
More good news for America
On Wed, 01 Jul 2009 17:32:04 -0400, HK wrote:
jps wrote: On Wed, 01 Jul 2009 16:55:51 -0400, Keith Nuttle wrote: HK wrote: Lu Powell wrote: "HK" wrote in message m... The NY Post is run by Rupert Murdoch to further his conservative agenda. It loses $50 million a year. snip Whoosh. It's not about losing revenue. Most newspapers are hurting because of the shifts in media habits. The rags I mentioned are operated to further an individual's political agenda. The NY Times, a moderate-to-mildly liberal newspaper, is not. It isn't owned by an individual, as are the NY Post, the Wash Times, or the Trib-Review. Got it, Lu? Probably not. If you talking all media, I believe the most listened talk show is Russ Limbaugh, a strong conservative. Someone the obama would love to shut down as people look to Russ to keep them informed of what the liberals re up to. Oy. "Russ" Limbaugh...his fans still can't spell his name after all these years. The use of "informed" was what got me. Twisting facts into fiction is what Rush does best. A leader for simps who want to have a problem with liberals 'cause they were never taught to share. |
More good news for America
"HK" wrote in message ... Lu Powell wrote: "HK" wrote in message m... Lu Powell wrote: "HK" wrote in message m... The NY Post is run by Rupert Murdoch to further his conservative agenda. It loses $50 million a year. The Washington Times is run by Rev. Sun Myung Moon to further his conservative agenda. By some estimates Rev. Moon has sunk $2 to $3 billion into it and it has never been profitable. The Pittsburgh Tribune-Review is run by Richard Mellon Scaife to further his conservative agenda. It loses $20 to $30 million a year. The Weekly Standard used to be owned by Murdoch to further his conservative agenda but is now owned by Philip Anschutz to further his conservative agenda. Either way, it loses $5 million a year. Swiped from KOS And the New York Times (liberal is its middle name) is on the verge of bankruptcy. Tell it all or don't tell it at all. Swiped from www.Breitbart.com at http://www.breitbart.com/article.php...ow_article= 1 The New York Times Co. reported a steep drop in third-quarter profits on Thursday, the latest gloomy earnings report in an industry battered by online competition and falling print advertising revenue. The New York Times Co. said net profit fell by 51.4 percent in the third quarter to 6.5 million dollars, or five cents per share, from 13.4 million dollars, or nine cents per share, in the same period a year ago. The company, which owns About.com, The Boston Globe, International Herald Tribune and 16 other daily newspapers besides the flagship The New York Times, said overall advertising revenue fell by 14.4 percent during the quarter. Shortly after the release of its results, Standard & Poors said it was lowering the Times's credit rating to "BB-," or junk status, while Moody's Investors Service said it was placing it on review for possible downgrade. Whoosh. It's not about losing revenue. Most newspapers are hurting because of the shifts in media habits. The rags I mentioned are operated to further an individual's political agenda. The NY Times, a moderate-to-mildly liberal newspaper, is not. It isn't owned by an individual, as are the NY Post, the Wash Times, or the Trib-Review. Got it, Lu? Probably not. I do get the difference. KOS is not exactly the most objective source for anything. Its existence is due in part to the largesse of a billionaire with his own agenda. That sort of makes KOS a rag like the ones you slammed. As I said, tell it all or don't tell it at all. Relax. Have some fun. Go boating. Show your wife how lucky she is to have a man like you. KOS doesn't pretend to be a newspaper. It is an opinion site. It does have writers who present factually based articles, and it does "reprint" factual news from other sites. Faux News, the NY Post, the Wash Times, et cetera, are nothing more than the personal rags and playthings of their owners. The Wash Times is owned and operated by the Loonie Moonies, and is run as an adjunct to their political and religious agenda. Thanks for the education. KOS has its own agenda, just like the "rags" you think are evil. No need to discuss further. Now go have some fun. Show your wife how lucky she is to have a man like you. |
More good news for America
"HK" wrote in message ... Lu Powell wrote: "HK" wrote in message ... JustWaitAFrekinMinute! wrote: On Jul 1, 4:48 pm, jps wrote: On Wed, 1 Jul 2009 16:36:13 -0400, "Lu Powell" wrote: "HK" wrote in message m... The NY Post is run by Rupert Murdoch to further his conservative agenda. It loses $50 million a year. The Washington Times is run by Rev. Sun Myung Moon to further his conservative agenda. By some estimates Rev. Moon has sunk $2 to $3 billion into it and it has never been profitable. The Pittsburgh Tribune-Review is run by Richard Mellon Scaife to further his conservative agenda. It loses $20 to $30 million a year. The Weekly Standard used to be owned by Murdoch to further his conservative agenda but is now owned by Philip Anschutz to further his conservative agenda. Either way, it loses $5 million a year. Swiped from KOS And the New York Times (liberal is its middle name) is on the verge of bankruptcy. Tell it all or don't tell it at all. Swiped fromwww.Breitbart.com at http://www.breitbart.com/article.php...7uwdxs&show_ar... The New York Times Co. reported a steep drop in third-quarter profits on Thursday, the latest gloomy earnings report in an industry battered by online competition and falling print advertising revenue. The New York Times Co. said net profit fell by 51.4 percent in the third quarter to 6.5 million dollars, or five cents per share, from 13.4 million dollars, or nine cents per share, in the same period a year ago. The company, which owns About.com, The Boston Globe, International Herald Tribune and 16 other daily newspapers besides the flagship The New York Times, said overall advertising revenue fell by 14.4 percent during the quarter. Shortly after the release of its results, Standard & Poors said it was lowering the Times's credit rating to "BB-," or junk status, while Moody's Investors Service said it was placing it on review for possible downgrade. What's this bit about the NY Times turning a net profit? Something the three conservatives are lacking. Selling liberalism must be far more profitable. Why aren't the conservatives in that business?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Fiction sells... The New York Lies is well known for making it up as they go along.. What a waste of resources.. Uh...no one asked for the opinion of an uninformed, uneducated, ignorant, and hopelessly stupid idiot like you. Swinburne, no doubt, had one of your ancestors in mind when he wrote in Testaments: "An Idiote, or a naturall foole is he, who notwithstanding he bee of lawfull age, yet he is so witlesse, that hee can not number to twentie, nor can tell what age he is of, nor knoweth who is his father, or mother, nor is able to answer to any such easie question." You know, like "built any boats lately?" Attacking the messenger, ignoring the valid message. In justhate's case, the messenger and the message are identical...uninformed idiocy. I rest my case. |
More good news for America
On Wed, 1 Jul 2009 20:24:59 -0400, "Lu Powell"
wrote: "HK" wrote in message ... Lu Powell wrote: "HK" wrote in message ... JustWaitAFrekinMinute! wrote: On Jul 1, 4:48 pm, jps wrote: On Wed, 1 Jul 2009 16:36:13 -0400, "Lu Powell" wrote: "HK" wrote in message m... The NY Post is run by Rupert Murdoch to further his conservative agenda. It loses $50 million a year. The Washington Times is run by Rev. Sun Myung Moon to further his conservative agenda. By some estimates Rev. Moon has sunk $2 to $3 billion into it and it has never been profitable. The Pittsburgh Tribune-Review is run by Richard Mellon Scaife to further his conservative agenda. It loses $20 to $30 million a year. The Weekly Standard used to be owned by Murdoch to further his conservative agenda but is now owned by Philip Anschutz to further his conservative agenda. Either way, it loses $5 million a year. Swiped from KOS And the New York Times (liberal is its middle name) is on the verge of bankruptcy. Tell it all or don't tell it at all. Swiped fromwww.Breitbart.com at http://www.breitbart.com/article.php...7uwdxs&show_ar... The New York Times Co. reported a steep drop in third-quarter profits on Thursday, the latest gloomy earnings report in an industry battered by online competition and falling print advertising revenue. The New York Times Co. said net profit fell by 51.4 percent in the third quarter to 6.5 million dollars, or five cents per share, from 13.4 million dollars, or nine cents per share, in the same period a year ago. The company, which owns About.com, The Boston Globe, International Herald Tribune and 16 other daily newspapers besides the flagship The New York Times, said overall advertising revenue fell by 14.4 percent during the quarter. Shortly after the release of its results, Standard & Poors said it was lowering the Times's credit rating to "BB-," or junk status, while Moody's Investors Service said it was placing it on review for possible downgrade. What's this bit about the NY Times turning a net profit? Something the three conservatives are lacking. Selling liberalism must be far more profitable. Why aren't the conservatives in that business?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Fiction sells... The New York Lies is well known for making it up as they go along.. What a waste of resources.. Uh...no one asked for the opinion of an uninformed, uneducated, ignorant, and hopelessly stupid idiot like you. Swinburne, no doubt, had one of your ancestors in mind when he wrote in Testaments: "An Idiote, or a naturall foole is he, who notwithstanding he bee of lawfull age, yet he is so witlesse, that hee can not number to twentie, nor can tell what age he is of, nor knoweth who is his father, or mother, nor is able to answer to any such easie question." You know, like "built any boats lately?" Attacking the messenger, ignoring the valid message. In justhate's case, the messenger and the message are identical...uninformed idiocy. I rest my case. That'd be foolish Perry, since you'd lose. |
More good news for America
On Jul 1, 4:12*pm, HK wrote:
sniped past blather KOS doesn't pretend to be a newspaper. It is an opinion site. It does have writers who present factually based articles, and it does "reprint" factual news from other sites. So, Herr Krause. You finally admit that "The KOS" is as worthless as "The Onion" Or the grocery market tabloid, "The Examiner?" |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:44 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com