Sanford not ambitious enough
 

Gov. Sanford had an affair, well, how bad is that? Is it the same as
buggering congressional aides as Barney Frank did. IS it on the same
level as killing a young woman as Kennedy did? is it the same as
hiding $60,000 of bribe money in your freezer as Jefferson did? Is it
the same as getting multiple BJs by an employee and then committing
perjury? Is it the same as embezzling $80 million as Obamas buddies
did in Sacramento? Is it the same as pardoning someone for tens of
millions in tax evasion who then contributes to your campaign (Rich
and Clinton).
The problem as I see it is that Repubs are not ambitious enough when
it comes to committing crime compared to Dems.

Sanford not ambitious enough
 

On Jun 26, 2:59*pm, Frogwatch wrote:
Gov. Sanford had an affair, well, how bad is that? *Is it the same as
buggering congressional aides as Barney Frank did. *IS it on the same
level as killing a young woman as Kennedy did? *is it the same as
hiding $60,000 of bribe money in your freezer as Jefferson did? *Is it
the same as getting multiple BJs by an employee and then committing
perjury? *Is it the same as embezzling $80 million as Obamas buddies
did in Sacramento? *Is it the same as pardoning someone for tens of
millions in tax evasion who then contributes to your campaign (Rich
and Clinton).
The problem as I see it is that Repubs are not ambitious enough when
it comes to committing crime compared to Dems.

Does Sanfords crime rise to the same level as Conyers taking Bribes?
Does it rise to the same level as Dodds relationship with Countrywide,
is it on the same level as Murtha's corruption? We are talking about
professional levels of evil here, Sanford is simply an amateur.

Sanford not ambitious enough
 

Frogwatch wrote:
Gov. Sanford had an affair, well, how bad is that? Is it the same as
buggering congressional aides as Barney Frank did. IS it on the same
level as killing a young woman as Kennedy did? is it the same as
hiding $60,000 of bribe money in your freezer as Jefferson did? Is it
the same as getting multiple BJs by an employee and then committing
perjury? Is it the same as embezzling $80 million as Obamas buddies
did in Sacramento? Is it the same as pardoning someone for tens of
millions in tax evasion who then contributes to your campaign (Rich
and Clinton).
The problem as I see it is that Repubs are not ambitious enough when
it comes to committing crime compared to Dems.


Are you really so ****ing stupid that you don't get it?

Sanford held himself up as a paragon of virtue and family values, and
demanded other politicans who cheated on their wives resign. He acted as
if he would never engage in an extramarital dalliance, that such was
beneath him.

It's the hypocrisy, typically the Republican hypocrisy, about sex. I
don't recall Barney Frank or Teddy Kennedy ever holding themselves up as
paragons of sexual fidelity. But Republicans do. It's the conservative
Republican fraud.

Got it now? Or are you still in the dark?

Sanford not ambitious enough
 

Frogwatch wrote:
On Jun 26, 2:59 pm, Frogwatch wrote:
Gov. Sanford had an affair, well, how bad is that? Is it the same as
buggering congressional aides as Barney Frank did. IS it on the same
level as killing a young woman as Kennedy did? is it the same as
hiding $60,000 of bribe money in your freezer as Jefferson did? Is it
the same as getting multiple BJs by an employee and then committing
perjury? Is it the same as embezzling $80 million as Obamas buddies
did in Sacramento? Is it the same as pardoning someone for tens of
millions in tax evasion who then contributes to your campaign (Rich
and Clinton).
The problem as I see it is that Repubs are not ambitious enough when
it comes to committing crime compared to Dems.

Does Sanfords crime rise to the same level as Conyers taking Bribes?
Does it rise to the same level as Dodds relationship with Countrywide,
is it on the same level as Murtha's corruption? We are talking about
professional levels of evil here, Sanford is simply an amateur.


Crime? I haven't read where Sanford has committed a crime. What he's
guilty of is hypocrisy and, of course, cheating on his wife.

Sanford not ambitious enough
 

Wayne.B wrote:
On Fri, 26 Jun 2009 14:20:24 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch
wrote:

I have no problem with Sanford's affair. Why does HK worry about it

Harry loves it when you discuss his foibles. He'd like to have an
affair also but has been unable to find a willing partner.


Not me, W'hine. Unlike you, I'm married to a much younger woman, not an
older one, like you.

Sanford not ambitious enough
 

HK wrote:
Wayne.B wrote:
On Fri, 26 Jun 2009 14:20:24 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch
wrote:

I have no problem with Sanford's affair. Why does HK worry about it

Harry loves it when you discuss his foibles. He'd like to have an
affair also but has been unable to find a willing partner.


Not me, W'hine. Unlike you, I'm married to a much younger woman, not an
older one, like you.

Perhaps she took pity on you or she looks at you as a father figure.
Just speculating.

Sanford not ambitious enough
 

"Jim2424242" wrote in message
...
HK wrote:
Wayne.B wrote:
On Fri, 26 Jun 2009 14:20:24 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch
wrote:

I have no problem with Sanford's affair. Why does HK worry about it

Harry loves it when you discuss his foibles. He'd like to have an
affair also but has been unable to find a willing partner.


Not me, W'hine. Unlike you, I'm married to a much younger woman, not an
older one, like you.

Perhaps she took pity on you or she looks at you as a father figure. Just
speculating.

Or it's simply not true. You make the call. ;-)

--Mike

Sanford not ambitious enough
 

"HK" wrote in message
m...
Wayne.B wrote:
On Fri, 26 Jun 2009 14:20:24 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch
wrote:

I have no problem with Sanford's affair. Why does HK worry about it

Harry loves it when you discuss his foibles. He'd like to have an
affair also but has been unable to find a willing partner.


Not me, W'hine. Unlike you, I'm married to a much younger woman, not an
older one, like you.


And just what does age have to do with desirability?

Sanford not ambitious enough
 

D.Duck wrote:
"HK" wrote in message
m...
Wayne.B wrote:
On Fri, 26 Jun 2009 14:20:24 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch
wrote:

I have no problem with Sanford's affair. Why does HK worry about it
Harry loves it when you discuss his foibles. He'd like to have an
affair also but has been unable to find a willing partner.

Not me, W'hine. Unlike you, I'm married to a much younger woman, not an
older one, like you.


And just what does age have to do with desirability?




Nothing much.


http://tiny.cc/5TO1f


http://tiny.cc/KHlKj

Sanford not ambitious enough
 

HK wrote:
D.Duck wrote:
"HK" wrote in message
m...
Wayne.B wrote:
On Fri, 26 Jun 2009 14:20:24 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch
wrote:

I have no problem with Sanford's affair. Why does HK worry about it
Harry loves it when you discuss his foibles. He'd like to have an
affair also but has been unable to find a willing partner.

Not me, W'hine. Unlike you, I'm married to a much younger woman, not
an older one, like you.


And just what does age have to do with desirability?



Nothing much.


http://tiny.cc/5TO1f


http://tiny.cc/KHlKj
Your landlady or Megan. Hmmm. I'll go with Megan.