![]() |
Naval tradition on display
Looks like some good old naval tradition will be on display tomorrow.
The old videos from 1959 with a very young looking Queen Elizabeth, and a 1979 film with the Queen mother are interesting. At the start of the 1979 version the observent can see the white building where I worked from 1971 till 1993. http://thechronicleherald.ca/Metro/1129196.html |
Naval tradition on display
On Fri, 26 Jun 2009 10:19:44 -0300, "Don White"
wrote: Looks like some good old naval tradition will be on display tomorrow. The old videos from 1959 with a very young looking Queen Elizabeth, and a 1979 film with the Queen mother are interesting. At the start of the 1979 version the observent can see the white building where I worked from 1971 till 1993. http://thechronicleherald.ca/Metro/1129196.html (We'll try something different) Very nice, Don, impressive indeed. Will you be able to attend the ceremony? With the music, flyover, etc, it should be a good show. I can't understand why "...a vital symbol to the Canadian navy." would also be used as mentioned later in the article: "When a ship displayed her Queen’s Colour in battle it was a symbol of defeat." Any idea why that was? -- John H "HONK - if I'm paying your mortgage!" |
Naval tradition on display
"John H" wrote in message ... On Fri, 26 Jun 2009 10:19:44 -0300, "Don White" wrote: Looks like some good old naval tradition will be on display tomorrow. The old videos from 1959 with a very young looking Queen Elizabeth, and a 1979 film with the Queen mother are interesting. At the start of the 1979 version the observent can see the white building where I worked from 1971 till 1993. http://thechronicleherald.ca/Metro/1129196.html (We'll try something different) Very nice, Don, impressive indeed. Will you be able to attend the ceremony? With the music, flyover, etc, it should be a good show. I can't understand why "...a vital symbol to the Canadian navy." would also be used as mentioned later in the article: "When a ship displayed her Queen's Colour in battle it was a symbol of defeat." Any idea why that was? -- John H Since I've never been in the military, I'd be guessing... but I would suppose that is the ship's prized possession and giving it up is tha same as giving up the ship. You're the Lt Colonel...does that make sense? |
Naval tradition on display
On Fri, 26 Jun 2009 10:41:39 -0300, "Don White"
wrote: "John H" wrote in message .. . On Fri, 26 Jun 2009 10:19:44 -0300, "Don White" wrote: Looks like some good old naval tradition will be on display tomorrow. The old videos from 1959 with a very young looking Queen Elizabeth, and a 1979 film with the Queen mother are interesting. At the start of the 1979 version the observent can see the white building where I worked from 1971 till 1993. http://thechronicleherald.ca/Metro/1129196.html (We'll try something different) Very nice, Don, impressive indeed. Will you be able to attend the ceremony? With the music, flyover, etc, it should be a good show. I can't understand why "...a vital symbol to the Canadian navy." would also be used as mentioned later in the article: "When a ship displayed her Queen's Colour in battle it was a symbol of defeat." Any idea why that was? -- John H Since I've never been in the military, I'd be guessing... but I would suppose that is the ship's prized possession and giving it up is tha same as giving up the ship. You're the Lt Colonel...does that make sense? I'm not a Lt Colonel. The article used the term 'displayed' as opposed to 'relinquished'. The latter could make sense, but the former doesn't, unless the flag is a symbol of defeat and means, "I give up!" Maybe whoever wrote the article just used a wrong word. -- John H "HONK - if I'm paying your mortgage!" |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:59 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com