John H wrote:
On Thu, 18 Jun 2009 15:02:35 -0400, "Reginald P Smithers III, Esq."
wrote:

Frogwatch wrote:
.

Froggy,
I would be VERY VERY careful providing Harry with ANY personal info.

I most fervently agree with that post.
--

John H

If WAFA pulls any ****, he will see his personal information reposted
(yes, it's available in Google)and cross posted to no less than 100
"interesting" groups. He was quiet for a week after it landed here.
He'll have to move if he pushes his luck.

"D K" wrote in message
...
John H wrote:
On Thu, 18 Jun 2009 15:02:35 -0400, "Reginald P Smithers III, Esq."
wrote:

Frogwatch wrote:
.

Froggy,
I would be VERY VERY careful providing Harry with ANY personal info.

I most fervently agree with that post.
--

John H

If WAFA pulls any ****, he will see his personal information reposted
(yes, it's available in Google)and cross posted to no less than 100
"interesting" groups. He was quiet for a week after it landed here. He'll
have to move if he pushes his luck.

Just do it! He claims that it's OK and even preferable to post your personal
info here. Those of us that don't are just cowards. Go ahead and post it to
remind him how STUPID it is, to post such personal info on the internet.

--Mike

On Jun 18, 8:01*pm, D K wrote:
John H wrote:
On Thu, 18 Jun 2009 15:02:35 -0400, "Reginald P Smithers III, Esq."
wrote:

Frogwatch wrote:
.

Froggy,
I would be VERY VERY careful providing Harry with ANY personal info.

I most fervently agree with that post.
--

John H

If WAFA pulls any ****, he will see his personal information reposted
(yes, it's available in Google)and cross posted to no less than 100
"interesting" groups. *He was quiet for a week after it landed here.
He'll have to move if he pushes his luck.

Oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo ooooooooooooooooooooooooo

"Scott Dickson" wrote in message
...
On Jun 18, 8:01 pm, D K wrote:
John H wrote:
On Thu, 18 Jun 2009 15:02:35 -0400, "Reginald P Smithers III, Esq."
wrote:

Frogwatch wrote:
.

Froggy,
I would be VERY VERY careful providing Harry with ANY personal info.

I most fervently agree with that post.
--

John H

If WAFA pulls any ****, he will see his personal information reposted
(yes, it's available in Google)and cross posted to no less than 100
"interesting" groups. He was quiet for a week after it landed here.
He'll have to move if he pushes his luck.

Oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo ooooooooooooooooooooooooo

That Ditzy Dan is one 'tough character', hiding down below the Mason-Dixon
line.
Any organizations down there to handle his kind of threats?

Don White wrote:
"Scott Dickson" wrote in message
...
On Jun 18, 8:01 pm, D K wrote:
John H wrote:
On Thu, 18 Jun 2009 15:02:35 -0400, "Reginald P Smithers III, Esq."
wrote:
Frogwatch wrote:
.
Froggy,
I would be VERY VERY careful providing Harry with ANY personal info.
I most fervently agree with that post.
--
John H
If WAFA pulls any ****, he will see his personal information reposted
(yes, it's available in Google)and cross posted to no less than 100
"interesting" groups. He was quiet for a week after it landed here.
He'll have to move if he pushes his luck.

Oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo ooooooooooooooooooooooooo

That Ditzy Dan is one 'tough character', hiding down below the Mason-Dixon
line.
Any organizations down there to handle his kind of threats?



Nothing to "handle", dummy. It will be a public service.

"D K" wrote in message
...
Don White wrote:
"Scott Dickson" wrote in message
...
On Jun 18, 8:01 pm, D K wrote:
John H wrote:
On Thu, 18 Jun 2009 15:02:35 -0400, "Reginald P Smithers III, Esq."
wrote:
Frogwatch wrote:
.
Froggy,
I would be VERY VERY careful providing Harry with ANY personal info.
I most fervently agree with that post.
--
John H
If WAFA pulls any ****, he will see his personal information reposted
(yes, it's available in Google)and cross posted to no less than 100
"interesting" groups. He was quiet for a week after it landed here.
He'll have to move if he pushes his luck.

Oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo ooooooooooooooooooooooooo

That Ditzy Dan is one 'tough character', hiding down below the
Mason-Dixon line.
Any organizations down there to handle his kind of threats?

Nothing to "handle", dummy. It will be a public service.


A "public service" would be you keeping your head below the toilet bowl rim.

Don White wrote:
"D K" wrote in message
...
Don White wrote:
"Scott Dickson" wrote in message
...
On Jun 18, 8:01 pm, D K wrote:
John H wrote:
On Thu, 18 Jun 2009 15:02:35 -0400, "Reginald P Smithers III, Esq."
wrote:
Frogwatch wrote:
.
Froggy,
I would be VERY VERY careful providing Harry with ANY personal info.
I most fervently agree with that post.
--
John H
If WAFA pulls any ****, he will see his personal information reposted
(yes, it's available in Google)and cross posted to no less than 100
"interesting" groups. He was quiet for a week after it landed here.
He'll have to move if he pushes his luck.
Oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo ooooooooooooooooooooooooo

That Ditzy Dan is one 'tough character', hiding down below the
Mason-Dixon line.
Any organizations down there to handle his kind of threats?
Nothing to "handle", dummy. It will be a public service.


A "public service" would be you keeping your head below the toilet bowl rim.



You are simply too dumb to "get it".