|
Can you say Bitch?
HK wrote:
Don White wrote: "HK" wrote in message ... John H wrote: On Thu, 18 Jun 2009 15:02:35 -0400, "Reginald P Smithers III, Esq." wrote: Frogwatch wrote: . Froggy, I would be VERY VERY careful providing Harry with ANY personal info. I most fervently agree with that post. -- John H Really, Herring? I've known your address for years. Ever seen me sniffing around your humble abode? Of course not. You actually invited that ungrateful 'soldier' out for a cruise on your boat......what does he do in response? Quite a piece of work. Actually, I invited him out a couple of times, including once when his boat was out of service for a while. He was a **** then, and he's a **** now. You can't buy friendship with a ride on a steeenkin skow. I expect Mr. Herring had good reason to respectfully decline your invitations. |
Can you say Bitch?
Don White wrote:
"John H" wrote in message ... In the Army, I always addressed senior females as 'ma'am'. Senior males were 'sir'. That's the way it was. Boxer's a bitch. -- John H Is she an army officer, genius? Is he a senator, (I can't say the rest. I just can't) |
Can you say Bitch?
On Thu, 18 Jun 2009 17:10:57 -0400, Jim24242
wrote: HK wrote: Don White wrote: "HK" wrote in message ... John H wrote: On Thu, 18 Jun 2009 15:02:35 -0400, "Reginald P Smithers III, Esq." wrote: Frogwatch wrote: . Froggy, I would be VERY VERY careful providing Harry with ANY personal info. I most fervently agree with that post. -- John H Really, Herring? I've known your address for years. Ever seen me sniffing around your humble abode? Of course not. You actually invited that ungrateful 'soldier' out for a cruise on your boat......what does he do in response? Quite a piece of work. Actually, I invited him out a couple of times, including once when his boat was out of service for a while. He was a **** then, and he's a **** now. You can't buy friendship with a ride on a steeenkin skow. I expect Mr. Herring had good reason to respectfully decline your invitations. You see his behavior here. Could you imagine spending several hours on a small boat with that? -- John H "HONK - if I'm paying your mortgage!" |
Can you say Bitch?
On Jun 18, 12:09*pm, Loogypicker wrote:
On Jun 18, 12:57*pm, "Reginald P Smithers III, Esq." wrote: JustWaitAFrekinMinute! wrote: On Jun 18, 12:42 pm, "Reginald P Smithers III, Esq." wrote: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ryEGmkjv8R8 -- Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq. This Newsgroup post is a natural product. The slight variations in spelling and grammar enhance its individual character and beauty and in no way are to be considered flaws or defects Problem is with her, she always has that attitude with military.. It's part of her Shtick while her husband makes a fortune in the supply side of it..;) He was being VERY respectful, and she came across as a real bitch. * It he was not showing her respect, I could go along with *her stopping the testimony to demand she be called Senator, but the way she handled it showed that she does have a real insecurity problem. As do almost all politicians. That's why they are what they are. agreed! |
Can you say Bitch?
"John H" wrote in message ... On Thu, 18 Jun 2009 17:13:28 -0300, "Don White" wrote: "John H" wrote in message . .. In the Army, I always addressed senior females as 'ma'am'. Senior males were 'sir'. That's the way it was. Boxer's a bitch. -- John H Is she an army officer, genius? She's a Senator. Sometimes I think the folks who refer to you as 'stupid' or 'dumb' are correct. -- John H Duh! Yu'd better be looking in a clear mirror when you're calling someone stupid. You said..."In the Army, I always addressed senior females as 'ma'am'" I replied..."Is she an army officer, genius?" Go smoke some more of Looneys 'Georgia Bud'. |
Can you say Bitch?
On Jun 18, 12:19*pm, HK wrote:
JustWaitAFrekinMinute! wrote: On Jun 18, 12:42 pm, "Reginald P Smithers III, Esq." wrote: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ryEGmkjv8R8 -- Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq. This Newsgroup post is a natural product. The slight variations in spelling and grammar enhance its individual character and beauty and in no way are to be considered flaws or defects Problem is with her, she always has that attitude with military.. It's part of her Shtick while her husband makes a fortune in the supply side of it..;) The senator was absolutely correct. That general would not have addressed a male senator as mister. If he wanted to use that form of speech, he could have properly and respectfully addressed her as Madam Senator, madam being the full form of ma'am. "Senator," would have been sufficient, as would have "Senator Boxer." Last time I knew, the military protocol for addressing senior officers is either "yes/No Sir, or Yes/Mo Ma'am. Even to the point where it becomes a natural habit. I address others with Sir/Ma'am, even to this day because it was the way I was taught while young. I'm sure the general meant no offense, and to him he was following a proper protocol. OK so Boxer thought it uncouth. well, I think it was her problem, not his. maybe being addressed as "Senator" makes her feel more important. Maybe she has low self esteem or something. |
Can you say Bitch?
On Jun 18, 12:19*pm, HK wrote:
JustWaitAFrekinMinute! wrote: On Jun 18, 12:42 pm, "Reginald P Smithers III, Esq." wrote: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ryEGmkjv8R8 -- Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq. This Newsgroup post is a natural product. The slight variations in spelling and grammar enhance its individual character and beauty and in no way are to be considered flaws or defects Problem is with her, she always has that attitude with military.. It's part of her Shtick while her husband makes a fortune in the supply side of it..;) The senator was absolutely correct. That general would not have addressed a male senator as mister. If he wanted to use that form of speech, he could have properly and respectfully addressed her as Madam Senator, madam being the full form of ma'am. "Senator," would have been sufficient, as would have "Senator Boxer." There is a protocol for addressing officials, and the fact that you and the other uneducated ****s don't know it doesn't excuse those who should know from not knowing. Last time I knew, the military protocol for addressing senior officers is either "yes/No Sir, or Yes/No Ma'am. Even to the point where it becomes a natural habit. I address others with Sir/Ma'am, even to this day because it was the way I was taught while young. I'm sure the General meant no offense, and to him he was following a proper protocol. OK so Boxer thought it uncouth. well, I think it was her problem, not his. maybe being addressed as "Senator" makes her feel more important. Maybe she has low self esteem or something. |
Can you say Bitch?
Reginald P Smithers III, Esq. wrote:
Eisboch wrote: "HK" wrote in message m... The senator was absolutely correct. That general would not have addressed a male senator as mister. If he wanted to use that form of speech, he could have properly and respectfully addressed her as Madam Senator, madam being the full form of ma'am. "Senator," would have been sufficient, as would have "Senator Boxer." There is a protocol for addressing officials, and the fact that you and the other uneducated ****s don't know it doesn't excuse those who should know from not knowing. You can tell by listening to the General that he addressed her as "ma'am" purposely to indicate disrespect for her or her official title. Sure he did. He screwed up, that's all. A simple, innocent and human mistake. I am sure this is hard to understand by those who never make mistakes. Eisboch During the exact same committee meeting General Walsh referred to the male Senators at the hearing as "sir" without receiving even a dirty look for any faux pas in protocol. Sure the correct protocol would have been Senator, but the male senators focused on the purpose of the meeting, instead of worrying about someone inadvertently using the wrong title. Well said. I agree with this post. |
Can you say Bitch?
Frogwatch wrote:
On Jun 18, 1:56 pm, "Reginald P Smithers III, Esq." wrote: Eisboch wrote: "HK" wrote in message m... The senator was absolutely correct. That general would not have addressed a male senator as mister. If he wanted to use that form of speech, he could have properly and respectfully addressed her as Madam Senator, madam being the full form of ma'am. "Senator," would have been sufficient, as would have "Senator Boxer." There is a protocol for addressing officials, and the fact that you and the other uneducated ****s don't know it doesn't excuse those who should know from not knowing. You can tell by listening to the General that he addressed her as "ma'am" purposely to indicate disrespect for her or her official title. Sure he did. He screwed up, that's all. A simple, innocent and human mistake. I am sure this is hard to understand by those who never make mistakes. Eisboch During the exact same committee meeting General Walsh referred to the male Senators at the hearing as "sir" without receiving even a dirty look for any faux pas in protocol. Sure the correct protocol would have been Senator, but the male senators focused on the purpose of the meeting, instead of worrying about someone inadvertently using the wrong title. -- Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq. This Newsgroup post is a natural product. The slight variations in spelling and grammar enhance its individual character and beauty and in no way are to be considered flaws or defects No need to insult bitches everywhere, just refer to her as "Democratic Senator" which is as derogatory as possible. I also agree with this post. |
Can you say Bitch?
Don White wrote:
"John H" wrote in message ... On Thu, 18 Jun 2009 17:13:28 -0300, "Don White" wrote: "John H" wrote in message ... In the Army, I always addressed senior females as 'ma'am'. Senior males were 'sir'. That's the way it was. Boxer's a bitch. -- John H Is she an army officer, genius? She's a Senator. Sometimes I think the folks who refer to you as 'stupid' or 'dumb' are correct. -- John H Duh! Yu'd better be looking in a clear mirror when you're calling someone stupid. You said..."In the Army, I always addressed senior females as 'ma'am'" I replied..."Is she an army officer, genius?" Go smoke some more of Looneys 'Georgia Bud'. Don't expect folks to pick up on your stupid reasoning. The normal brain doesn't work like yours. |
Can you say Bitch?
HK wrote:
Frogwatch wrote: On Jun 18, 2:40 pm, Loogypicker wrote: On Jun 18, 2:34 pm, HK wrote: Frogwatch wrote: No need to insult bitches everywhere, just refer to her as "Democratic Senator" which is as derogatory as possible. Just curious, what have you "invented" for which you have been issued a patent or patents that might be something that interests me as a boater. or even just an ordinary consumer and buyer of computer/electronic/photographic technology? I mean, you talk a lot about inventions, and you surely have put forth a number of less than half baked ideas for products that might be of interest here. Which have you developed to fruition? Who is selling them? What is their brand name? How many units have been sold? Maybe he'll answer those questions when you answer questions like: For Harry: Go to the USPTO website, click on search. go to the keyword input spot and put in:"David OHara, X-ray" and you will see. Otherwise, you can go to my company website by googling "Parallax Research, Inc., X-ray". As far as who is selling our products, that is always proprietary (We have NDA in place so I cannot tell you) but they are the largest names in analytical instrumentation and in the semiconductor business. I do not try to develop consumer products because I admit to being "aesthetically challenged" meaning I have poor taste. Nothing of interest to boaters unless you are a materials science person. My first attempt to patent was for an anti-fouling compund to be applied while the boat was in the water. I personally did the search and found it had already been developed by a British company. Since then I have stuck to x-ray stuff that pays my bills. I think 6 patents and 3 in the works. Yeah, I know of your x-ray stuff, since I visited your site a long time ago. So, you've got nothing that would interest boaters or just ordinary consumers who buy computers/electronics/photo technology for hobbies? Can you be any more narcissistic, WAFA? This is over the top! |
Can you say Bitch?
John H wrote:
On Thu, 18 Jun 2009 15:02:35 -0400, "Reginald P Smithers III, Esq." wrote: Frogwatch wrote: . Froggy, I would be VERY VERY careful providing Harry with ANY personal info. I most fervently agree with that post. -- John H If WAFA pulls any ****, he will see his personal information reposted (yes, it's available in Google)and cross posted to no less than 100 "interesting" groups. He was quiet for a week after it landed here. He'll have to move if he pushes his luck. |
Can you say Bitch?
HK wrote:
John H wrote: On Thu, 18 Jun 2009 15:18:29 -0400, HK wrote: John H wrote: On Thu, 18 Jun 2009 15:02:35 -0400, "Reginald P Smithers III, Esq." wrote: Frogwatch wrote: . Froggy, I would be VERY VERY careful providing Harry with ANY personal info. I most fervently agree with that post. -- John H Really, Herring? I've known your address for years. Ever seen me sniffing around your humble abode? Of course not. -- "John H" wrote in message ... Please note that Interstate 90 will be closed this weekend across South Dakota. This closure will allow the Federal Government free access to haul a 200 ton piece of coal to Mt. Rushmore so that President Obama can be added to the Presidents on the monument. -- John H Filter break? WAFL! -- John H No...just have it turned off for the moment while I make a couple of adjustments. It'll be up in a minute or two, and you'll be back in the septic tank, where you belong. Any chance of you injuring yourself really seriously in the next few months? Always hopeful. Adjustments? Do you think you are fooling anyone, WAFA? |
Can you say Bitch?
Jim24242 wrote:
Don White wrote: "Reginald P Smithers III, Esq." wrote in message ... JustWaitAFrekinMinute! wrote: On Jun 18, 12:42 pm, "Reginald P Smithers III, Esq." wrote: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ryEGmkjv8R8 -- Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq. This Newsgroup post is a natural product. The slight variations in spelling and grammar enhance its individual character and beauty and in no way are to be considered flaws or defects Problem is with her, she always has that attitude with military.. It's part of her Shtick while her husband makes a fortune in the supply side of it..;) He was being VERY respectful, and she came across as a real bitch. It he was not showing her respect, I could go along with her stopping the testimony to demand she be called Senator, but the way she handled it showed that she does have a real insecurity problem. -- Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq. This Newsgroup post is a natural product. The slight variations in spelling and grammar enhance its individual character and beauty and in no way are to be considered flaws or defects Bull... if someone in here had taken the entire Dope Army out for a trashing and lessons in proper manners, we wouldn't have half the trouble now. What? You aren't making any sense atol, young fella. Donnie is dumb and far from young. |
Can you say Bitch?
On Thu, 18 Jun 2009 20:25:34 -0300, "Don White"
wrote: "John H" wrote in message .. . On Thu, 18 Jun 2009 17:13:28 -0300, "Don White" wrote: "John H" wrote in message ... In the Army, I always addressed senior females as 'ma'am'. Senior males were 'sir'. That's the way it was. Boxer's a bitch. -- John H Is she an army officer, genius? She's a Senator. Sometimes I think the folks who refer to you as 'stupid' or 'dumb' are correct. -- John H Duh! Yu'd better be looking in a clear mirror when you're calling someone stupid. You said..."In the Army, I always addressed senior females as 'ma'am'" I replied..."Is she an army officer, genius?" Go smoke some more of Looneys 'Georgia Bud'. Donnie, your question was stupid. I didn't call you anything. -- John H I once shook hands with a pudgy guy who: Sailed from San Francisco to Hawaii. Rounded Cape Horn, twice. Transited the Panama Canal. Has owned more than 20 boats in his lifetime. Sailed large boats competitively. Has been hundreds of miles from land in a powerboat under his command. And who set a new record for the most distance covered and most fish caught in the Chesapeake Bay in the shortest time! |
Can you say Bitch?
Don White wrote:
"Reginald P Smithers III, Esq." wrote in message ... JustWaitAFrekinMinute! wrote: On Jun 18, 12:42 pm, "Reginald P Smithers III, Esq." wrote: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ryEGmkjv8R8 -- Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq. This Newsgroup post is a natural product. The slight variations in spelling and grammar enhance its individual character and beauty and in no way are to be considered flaws or defects Problem is with her, she always has that attitude with military.. It's part of her Shtick while her husband makes a fortune in the supply side of it..;) He was being VERY respectful, and she came across as a real bitch. It he was not showing her respect, I could go along with her stopping the testimony to demand she be called Senator, but the way she handled it showed that she does have a real insecurity problem. -- Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq. This Newsgroup post is a natural product. The slight variations in spelling and grammar enhance its individual character and beauty and in no way are to be considered flaws or defects Bull... if someone in here had taken the entire Dope Army out for a trashing and lessons in proper manners, we wouldn't have half the trouble now. Donnie, You are getting as bad as Harry Krause is with forgetting who he is pretending he has in his filter. -- Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq. This Newsgroup post is a natural product. The slight variations in spelling and grammar enhance its individual character and beauty and in no way are to be considered flaws or defects |
Can you say Bitch?
"D K" wrote in message ... John H wrote: On Thu, 18 Jun 2009 15:02:35 -0400, "Reginald P Smithers III, Esq." wrote: Frogwatch wrote: . Froggy, I would be VERY VERY careful providing Harry with ANY personal info. I most fervently agree with that post. -- John H If WAFA pulls any ****, he will see his personal information reposted (yes, it's available in Google)and cross posted to no less than 100 "interesting" groups. He was quiet for a week after it landed here. He'll have to move if he pushes his luck. Just do it! He claims that it's OK and even preferable to post your personal info here. Those of us that don't are just cowards. Go ahead and post it to remind him how STUPID it is, to post such personal info on the internet. --Mike |
Can you say Bitch?
Reginald P Smithers III, Esq. wrote:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ryEGmkjv8R8 It was a put down. It was blatant respect for him and the Military. It wouldn't have mattered if he had said Senator the first time. she was saying I'm the important subject here. |
Can you say Bitch?
Frog Breeches wrote:
Reginald P Smithers III, Esq. wrote: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ryEGmkjv8R8 It was a put down. It was blatant respect for him and the Military. It wouldn't have mattered if he had said Senator the first time. she was saying I'm the important subject here. In the Senate, it is the Senators who are the important ones. There are only 100 of them (99 at the moment); it is the most exclusive elected official federal government club in this country. Generals are a dime a dozen. -- "John H" wrote in message ... Please note that Interstate 90 will be closed this weekend across South Dakota. This closure will allow the Federal Government free access to haul a 200 ton piece of coal to Mt. Rushmore so that President Obama can be added to the Presidents on the monument. -- John H -- John Herring, rec.boat's resident racist and fluffer. |
Can you say Bitch?
"Reginald P Smithers III, Esq." wrote in message ... Don White wrote: "Reginald P Smithers III, Esq." wrote in message ... JustWaitAFrekinMinute! wrote: On Jun 18, 12:42 pm, "Reginald P Smithers III, Esq." wrote: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ryEGmkjv8R8 -- Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq. This Newsgroup post is a natural product. The slight variations in spelling and grammar enhance its individual character and beauty and in no way are to be considered flaws or defects Problem is with her, she always has that attitude with military.. It's part of her Shtick while her husband makes a fortune in the supply side of it..;) He was being VERY respectful, and she came across as a real bitch. It he was not showing her respect, I could go along with her stopping the testimony to demand she be called Senator, but the way she handled it showed that she does have a real insecurity problem. -- Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq. This Newsgroup post is a natural product. The slight variations in spelling and grammar enhance its individual character and beauty and in no way are to be considered flaws or defects Bull... if someone in here had taken the entire Dope Army out for a trashing and lessons in proper manners, we wouldn't have half the trouble now. Donnie, You are getting as bad as Harry Krause is with forgetting who he is pretending he has in his filter. -- Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq. Hee hee...not at all. You and Diaper Dan are always changing your info so you can climb up out of the excrement. The only difference between you and him...his first post earns his flushing back down...you take an average of three. Don't stain my porcelain on the way down. |
Can you say Bitch?
"HK" wrote in message m... In the Senate, it is the Senators who are the important ones. There are only 100 of them (99 at the moment); it is the most exclusive elected official federal government club in this country. Generals are a dime a dozen. Big whoop. Elected officials. Public servants with a dismal approval rating. If I were a sitting Senator right now I am not so sure I'd be so proud of it. Pure, unadultrated ego on her part. Eisboch |
Can you say Bitch?
"HK" wrote in message m... Frog Breeches wrote: Reginald P Smithers III, Esq. wrote: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ryEGmkjv8R8 It was a put down. It was blatant respect for him and the Military. It wouldn't have mattered if he had said Senator the first time. she was saying I'm the important subject here. In the Senate, it is the Senators who are the important ones. There are only 100 of them (99 at the moment); it is the most exclusive elected official federal government club in this country. Generals are a dime a dozen. You're a friggin' idiot. I can't believe you wrote that. It's easier to become a senator than it is to become a general you horses ass. --Mike |
Can you say Bitch?
On Jun 18, 8:01*pm, D K wrote:
John H wrote: On Thu, 18 Jun 2009 15:02:35 -0400, "Reginald P Smithers III, Esq." wrote: Frogwatch wrote: . Froggy, I would be VERY VERY careful providing Harry with ANY personal info. I most fervently agree with that post. -- John H If WAFA pulls any ****, he will see his personal information reposted (yes, it's available in Google)and cross posted to no less than 100 "interesting" groups. *He was quiet for a week after it landed here. He'll have to move if he pushes his luck. Oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo ooooooooooooooooooooooooo |
Can you say Bitch?
"HK" wrote in message m... Frog Breeches wrote: Reginald P Smithers III, Esq. wrote: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ryEGmkjv8R8 It was a put down. It was blatant respect for him and the Military. It wouldn't have mattered if he had said Senator the first time. she was saying I'm the important subject here. In the Senate, it is the Senators who are the important ones. There are only 100 of them (99 at the moment); it is the most exclusive elected official federal government club in this country. Generals are a dime a dozen. Incompetant duds. They are our employees! They are not royalty. And with an approval rating less than the former President's. You think they might engage their brain. |
Can you say Bitch?
"Calif Bill" wrote in message m... "HK" wrote in message m... Frog Breeches wrote: Reginald P Smithers III, Esq. wrote: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ryEGmkjv8R8 It was a put down. It was blatant respect for him and the Military. It wouldn't have mattered if he had said Senator the first time. she was saying I'm the important subject here. In the Senate, it is the Senators who are the important ones. There are only 100 of them (99 at the moment); it is the most exclusive elected official federal government club in this country. Generals are a dime a dozen. Incompetant duds. They are our employees! They are not royalty. And with an approval rating less than the former President's. You think they might engage their brain. I'm sure you meant no disrespect for the high office if Senator of the United States of America. How a bunch of incompetant slime balls attained seats in the Senate is beyond me. What is really sad is that one of the aforementioned is likely to be the next President of the United States of America. |
Can you say Bitch?
Eisboch wrote:
"HK" wrote in message m... In the Senate, it is the Senators who are the important ones. There are only 100 of them (99 at the moment); it is the most exclusive elected official federal government club in this country. Generals are a dime a dozen. Big whoop. Elected officials. Public servants with a dismal approval rating. If I were a sitting Senator right now I am not so sure I'd be so proud of it. Pure, unadultrated ego on her part. Eisboch Typical - you're no fan of democracy, but a big fan of the military. Well, it's no easy task becoming one of 100 U.S. senators. Any idiot, and I mean that in the fullest sense of the phrase (e.g., Herring, floridajim) can become part of the military. -- "John H" wrote in message ... Please note that Interstate 90 will be closed this weekend across South Dakota. This closure will allow the Federal Government free access to haul a 200 ton piece of coal to Mt. Rushmore so that President Obama can be added to the Presidents on the monument. -- John H -- John Herring, rec.boat's resident racist and brittle bones specialist. |
Can you say Bitch?
On Thu, 18 Jun 2009 22:38:20 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote: "HK" wrote in message om... Frog Breeches wrote: Reginald P Smithers III, Esq. wrote: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ryEGmkjv8R8 It was a put down. It was blatant respect for him and the Military. It wouldn't have mattered if he had said Senator the first time. she was saying I'm the important subject here. In the Senate, it is the Senators who are the important ones. There are only 100 of them (99 at the moment); it is the most exclusive elected official federal government club in this country. Generals are a dime a dozen. Incompetant duds. They are our employees! They are not royalty. And with an approval rating less than the former President's. You think they might engage their brain. Here's the problem: A year ago all those generals were working for Bush, and they were implementing his policies. Therefore, the Democrats had to treat them like ****, which they did. Now we have the same generals implementing the same policies, for the most part, and the Democrats *want* to treat them like ****. But, the generals have a new top dog, who is also a Democrat. This puts the Boxer's of the world in a hard place. They have to take their satisfaction any way they can. -- John H I once shook hands with a pudgy guy who: Sailed from San Francisco to Hawaii. Rounded Cape Horn, twice. Transited the Panama Canal. Has owned more than 20 boats in his lifetime. Sailed large boats competitively. Has been hundreds of miles from land in a powerboat under his command. And who set a new record for the most distance covered and most fish caught in the Chesapeake Bay in the shortest time! |
Can you say Bitch?
"HK" wrote in message m... Eisboch wrote: "HK" wrote in message m... In the Senate, it is the Senators who are the important ones. There are only 100 of them (99 at the moment); it is the most exclusive elected official federal government club in this country. Generals are a dime a dozen. Big whoop. Elected officials. Public servants with a dismal approval rating. If I were a sitting Senator right now I am not so sure I'd be so proud of it. Pure, unadultrated ego on her part. Eisboch Typical - you're no fan of democracy, but a big fan of the military. Well, it's no easy task becoming one of 100 U.S. senators. Any idiot, and I mean that in the fullest sense of the phrase (e.g., Herring, floridajim) can become part of the military. Strange way of interpreting a post .... and of thinking in general. My post had nothing to do with democracy or the military. Having said that however, the general deserves a compliment for maintaining his professional demeanor and not allowing his personal feelings to overcome it, as she did. I am simply not a big fan of egotistical, pompous blowhards. Haven't you noticed? Eisboch |
Can you say Bitch?
HK wrote:
Eisboch wrote: "HK" wrote in message m... In the Senate, it is the Senators who are the important ones. There are only 100 of them (99 at the moment); it is the most exclusive elected official federal government club in this country. Generals are a dime a dozen. Big whoop. Elected officials. Public servants with a dismal approval rating. If I were a sitting Senator right now I am not so sure I'd be so proud of it. Pure, unadultrated ego on her part. Eisboch Typical - you're no fan of democracy, but a big fan of the military. Well, it's no easy task becoming one of 100 U.S. senators. Any idiot, and I mean that in the fullest sense of the phrase (e.g., Herring, floridajim) can become part of the military. It seems that Harry Krause didn't qualify. Which was your disqualifier mental, physical, or sexual preference. All along I was thinking you were a coward, but maybe they rejected you. Which was it? |
Can you say Bitch?
On Jun 19, 6:07*am, "Eisboch" wrote:
"HK" wrote in message m... Eisboch wrote: "HK" wrote in message news:ppednQ7TKoD2a6fXnZ2dnUVZ_gti4p2d@earthlink. com... In the Senate, it is the Senators who are the important ones. There are only 100 of them (99 at the moment); it is the most exclusive elected official federal government club in this country. Generals are a dime a dozen. Big whoop. *Elected officials. *Public servants with a dismal approval rating. If I were a sitting Senator right now I am not so sure I'd be so proud of it. Pure, unadultrated ego on her part. Eisboch Typical - you're no fan of democracy, but a big fan of the military. Well, it's no easy task becoming one of 100 U.S. senators. Any idiot, and I mean that in the fullest sense of the phrase (e.g., Herring, floridajim) can become part of the military. Strange way of interpreting a post .... and of thinking in general. My post had nothing to do with democracy or the military. Having said that however, the general deserves a compliment for maintaining his professional demeanor and not allowing his personal feelings to overcome it, as she did. I am simply not a big fan of egotistical, pompous blowhards. Haven't you noticed? Eisboch LOL! I was just thinking, I wonder what the old battle axe would have done if when she announced that she "worked hard for a long time" to get that title.. If the General would have said "Are you bragging? or complaining?" |
Can you say Bitch?
On Thu, 18 Jun 2009 22:38:20 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote: "HK" wrote in message om... Frog Breeches wrote: Reginald P Smithers III, Esq. wrote: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ryEGmkjv8R8 It was a put down. It was blatant respect for him and the Military. It wouldn't have mattered if he had said Senator the first time. she was saying I'm the important subject here. In the Senate, it is the Senators who are the important ones. There are only 100 of them (99 at the moment); it is the most exclusive elected official federal government club in this country. Generals are a dime a dozen. Incompetant duds. They are our employees! They are not royalty. And with an approval rating less than the former President's. You think they might engage their brain. Here's the problem: A year ago all those generals were working for Bush, and they were implementing his policies. Therefore, the Democrats had to treat them like ****, which they did. Now we have the same generals implementing the same policies, for the most part, and the Democrats *want* to treat them like ****. But, the generals have a new top dog, who is also a Democrat. This puts the Boxer's of the world in a hard place. They have to take their satisfaction any way they can. -- John H I once shook hands with a pudgy guy who: Sailed from San Francisco to Hawaii. Rounded Cape Horn, twice. Transited the Panama Canal. Has owned more than 20 boats in his lifetime. Sailed large boats competitively. Has been hundreds of miles from land in a powerboat under his command. And who set a new record for the most distance covered and most fish caught in the Chesapeake Bay in the shortest time! |
Can you say Bitch?
"Scott Dickson" wrote in message ... On Jun 18, 8:01 pm, D K wrote: John H wrote: On Thu, 18 Jun 2009 15:02:35 -0400, "Reginald P Smithers III, Esq." wrote: Frogwatch wrote: . Froggy, I would be VERY VERY careful providing Harry with ANY personal info. I most fervently agree with that post. -- John H If WAFA pulls any ****, he will see his personal information reposted (yes, it's available in Google)and cross posted to no less than 100 "interesting" groups. He was quiet for a week after it landed here. He'll have to move if he pushes his luck. Oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo ooooooooooooooooooooooooo That Ditzy Dan is one 'tough character', hiding down below the Mason-Dixon line. Any organizations down there to handle his kind of threats? |
Can you say Bitch?
Eisboch wrote:
"HK" wrote in message m... Eisboch wrote: "HK" wrote in message m... In the Senate, it is the Senators who are the important ones. There are only 100 of them (99 at the moment); it is the most exclusive elected official federal government club in this country. Generals are a dime a dozen. Big whoop. Elected officials. Public servants with a dismal approval rating. If I were a sitting Senator right now I am not so sure I'd be so proud of it. Pure, unadultrated ego on her part. Eisboch Typical - you're no fan of democracy, but a big fan of the military. Well, it's no easy task becoming one of 100 U.S. senators. Any idiot, and I mean that in the fullest sense of the phrase (e.g., Herring, floridajim) can become part of the military. Strange way of interpreting a post .... and of thinking in general. My post had nothing to do with democracy or the military. Having said that however, the general deserves a compliment for maintaining his professional demeanor and not allowing his personal feelings to overcome it, as she did. I am simply not a big fan of egotistical, pompous blowhards. Haven't you noticed? Eisboch Really? You seem to be friends with SW Tom and D'whine. -- "John H" wrote in message ... Please note that Interstate 90 will be closed this weekend across South Dakota. This closure will allow the Federal Government free access to haul a 200 ton piece of coal to Mt. Rushmore so that President Obama can be added to the Presidents on the monument. -- John H -- John Herring, rec.boat's resident racist. |
Can you say Bitch?
"HK" wrote in message m... I am simply not a big fan of egotistical, pompous blowhards. Haven't you noticed? Eisboch Really? You seem to be friends with SW Tom and D'whine. To put it in marine radio terms, your transmitting section works fine but your receiving section has lost a bunch of sensitivity. Eisboch |
Can you say Bitch?
"Eisboch" wrote in message ... "HK" wrote in message m... I am simply not a big fan of egotistical, pompous blowhards. Haven't you noticed? Eisboch Really? You seem to be friends with SW Tom and D'whine. To put it in marine radio terms, your transmitting section works fine but your receiving section has lost a bunch of sensitivity. Eisboch Definition of "sensitivity" in this context? |
Can you say Bitch?
D.Duck wrote:
"Eisboch" wrote in message ... "HK" wrote in message m... I am simply not a big fan of egotistical, pompous blowhards. Haven't you noticed? Eisboch Really? You seem to be friends with SW Tom and D'whine. To put it in marine radio terms, your transmitting section works fine but your receiving section has lost a bunch of sensitivity. Eisboch Definition of "sensitivity" in this context? That's me...Mr. Sensitive. Sensitive enough to know Egotistical, Pompous Tom, aka Mr. Scientific Certainty, and d'Whine are gasbags. -- "John H" wrote in message ... Please note that Interstate 90 will be closed this weekend across South Dakota. This closure will allow the Federal Government free access to haul a 200 ton piece of coal to Mt. Rushmore so that President Obama can be added to the Presidents on the monument. -- John H -- John Herring, rec.boat's resident racist. |
Can you say Bitch?
"HK" wrote in message ... D.Duck wrote: "Eisboch" wrote in message ... "HK" wrote in message m... I am simply not a big fan of egotistical, pompous blowhards. Haven't you noticed? Eisboch Really? You seem to be friends with SW Tom and D'whine. To put it in marine radio terms, your transmitting section works fine but your receiving section has lost a bunch of sensitivity. Eisboch Definition of "sensitivity" in this context? That's me...Mr. Sensitive. Sensitive enough to know Egotistical, Pompous Tom, aka Mr. Scientific Certainty, and d'Whine are gasbags. Never noticed that. |
Can you say Bitch?
D.Duck wrote:
"HK" wrote in message ... D.Duck wrote: "Eisboch" wrote in message ... "HK" wrote in message m... I am simply not a big fan of egotistical, pompous blowhards. Haven't you noticed? Eisboch Really? You seem to be friends with SW Tom and D'whine. To put it in marine radio terms, your transmitting section works fine but your receiving section has lost a bunch of sensitivity. Eisboch Definition of "sensitivity" in this context? That's me...Mr. Sensitive. Sensitive enough to know Egotistical, Pompous Tom, aka Mr. Scientific Certainty, and d'Whine are gasbags. Never noticed that. When you read about rec.boats gasbag, does anyone in particular come to mind? -- Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq. This Newsgroup post is a natural product. The slight variations in spelling and grammar enhance its individual character and beauty and in no way are to be considered flaws or defects |
Can you say Bitch?
"Reginald P Smithers III, Esq." wrote in message ... D.Duck wrote: "HK" wrote in message ... D.Duck wrote: "Eisboch" wrote in message ... "HK" wrote in message m... I am simply not a big fan of egotistical, pompous blowhards. Haven't you noticed? Eisboch Really? You seem to be friends with SW Tom and D'whine. To put it in marine radio terms, your transmitting section works fine but your receiving section has lost a bunch of sensitivity. Eisboch Definition of "sensitivity" in this context? That's me...Mr. Sensitive. Sensitive enough to know Egotistical, Pompous Tom, aka Mr. Scientific Certainty, and d'Whine are gasbags. Never noticed that. When you read about rec.boats gasbag, does anyone in particular come to mind? -- Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq. This Newsgroup post is a natural product. The slight variations in spelling and grammar enhance its individual character and beauty and in no way are to be considered flaws or defects Yep. |
Can you say Bitch?
Don White wrote:
"Scott Dickson" wrote in message ... On Jun 18, 8:01 pm, D K wrote: John H wrote: On Thu, 18 Jun 2009 15:02:35 -0400, "Reginald P Smithers III, Esq." wrote: Frogwatch wrote: . Froggy, I would be VERY VERY careful providing Harry with ANY personal info. I most fervently agree with that post. -- John H If WAFA pulls any ****, he will see his personal information reposted (yes, it's available in Google)and cross posted to no less than 100 "interesting" groups. He was quiet for a week after it landed here. He'll have to move if he pushes his luck. Oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo ooooooooooooooooooooooooo That Ditzy Dan is one 'tough character', hiding down below the Mason-Dixon line. Any organizations down there to handle his kind of threats? Nothing to "handle", dummy. It will be a public service. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:21 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com