Tiara making...windmills...
 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r8M_B23dHco


Smart company...

--
Republican conservatism is so far out of the mainstream, it is serving
as a drainage ditch somewhere.

Tiara making...windmills...
 

HK wrote:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r8M_B23dHco


Smart company...

It is ironic that a person who sails supports windmills. Don't they
remember the hours that they have sat on their boats on a windless
summer evening.

Do they think that the windmills will produce energy when there is not
enough wind to move their boats?

Tiara making...windmills...
 

Keith Nuttle wrote:
HK wrote:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r8M_B23dHco


Smart company...

It is ironic that a person who sails supports windmills. Don't they
remember the hours that they have sat on their boats on a windless
summer evening.

Do they think that the windmills will produce energy when there is not
enough wind to move their boats?

D'oh...there are many places where winds are reasonably available and
reasonably predictable. A wind turbine does not have to operate 24-7 to
make sense.




--
Republican conservatism is so far out of the mainstream, it is serving
as a drainage ditch somewhere.

Tiara making...windmills...
 

On Wed, 17 Jun 2009 11:02:47 -0400, Keith Nuttle wrote:


It is ironic that a person who sails supports windmills. Don't they
remember the hours that they have sat on their boats on a windless
summer evening.

Do they think that the windmills will produce energy when there is not
enough wind to move their boats?

That may be a good argument against sailboats. It's not a good argument
against wind power.

Tiara making...windmills...
 

On Wed, 17 Jun 2009 11:02:47 -0400, Keith Nuttle
wrote:

HK wrote:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r8M_B23dHco


Smart company...

It is ironic that a person who sails supports windmills. Don't they
remember the hours that they have sat on their boats on a windless
summer evening.

Do they think that the windmills will produce energy when there is not
enough wind to move their boats?

Thank God we're not as stupid as the liberal French making 80% of
their electricity from nuclear energy!
--
John H

"Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the
gospel of envy, its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery."

Churchill

Tiara making...windmills...
 

HK wrote:
Keith Nuttle wrote:
HK wrote:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r8M_B23dHco


Smart company...

It is ironic that a person who sails supports windmills. Don't they
remember the hours that they have sat on their boats on a windless
summer evening.

Do they think that the windmills will produce energy when there is not
enough wind to move their boats?

D'oh...there are many places where winds are reasonably available and
reasonably predictable. A wind turbine does not have to operate 24-7 to
make sense.




It does to be a reliable source of energy. There is a narrow band of
wind speeds where a windmill can operate. To high of speeds and the
windmill suffers physical damage. To low and there is not enough energy
to turn the prop. Why do you think windmills were abandon 200 years
ago as a source power?

The carbon capture program is designed to outlaw the burning of carbon
based fuels. Its chemistry; for each pound of carbon burned about 4
pounds of Carbon Dioxide are produced. Or, if captured with lime, for
every rail car delivering coal, 5 rail cars of carbonates will leave for
disposal.

Once carbon fueled energy is removed you Must replace it with a
continuous, reliable energy source like Nuclear power plants. There are
no practical alternatives to mass, continuous, reliable, power production.

Tiara making...windmills...
 

John H wrote:
On Wed, 17 Jun 2009 11:02:47 -0400, Keith Nuttle
wrote:

HK wrote:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r8M_B23dHco



Thank God we're not as stupid as the liberal French making 80% of
their electricity from nuclear energy!
--
John H

Stupid like a fox.

Tiara making...windmills...
 

On Jun 17, 11:02*am, Keith Nuttle wrote:
HK wrote:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r8M_B23dHco

Smart company...

It is ironic that a person who sails supports windmills. *Don't they
remember the hours that they have sat on their boats on a windless
summer evening.

Do they think that the windmills will produce energy when there is not
enough wind to move their boats?

Just because the windmill may not produce constant power at a constant
rate doesn't make unfeasable. And no, the scientists and engineers
don't think the windmills will produce energy when the wind's not
blowing. Seems sort of silly to answer that question because most
would know the answer, but you asked......

Tiara making...windmills...
 

On Jun 17, 12:22*pm, Gene Kearns
wrote:
On Wed, 17 Jun 2009 11:27:48 -0400, John H penned the following well
considered thoughts to the readers of rec.boats:

|On Wed, 17 Jun 2009 11:02:47 -0400, Keith wrote:

||HK wrote:

|http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r8M_B23dHco
|
|
| Smart company...
|
|It is ironic that a person who sails supports windmills. *Don't they
|remember the hours that they have sat on their boats on a windless
|summer evening.
|
|Do they think that the windmills will produce energy when there is not
|enough wind to move their boats?
|
|Thank God we're not as stupid as the liberal French making 80% of
|their electricity from nuclear energy!

I'm gonna lean toward the ultraconservatives and vote for wind. I
currently pay two power bills. The nuclear fuel one is 30% higher than
the fossil fuel one and that doesn't account for finally paying the
piper and figuring out what to do with all of the warehoused spent
fuel waste.....

--
Agent 5.00 Build 1171

Grady-White Gulfstream, out of Oak Island, NC.

Homepagehttp://pamandgene.tranquilrefuge.net/* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

I'm all for most forms of non polluting, non fossil fuel power. I
would have to think that with a good solid nuclear power program the
price would go down. I wonder if it's the norm for people that are
using nuclear power to pay more? I know that Georgia has some nuke
plants operating, and want to build more. But we only get one bill
from a co-op so I don't know.

Tiara making...windmills...
 

On Jun 17, 1:30*pm, John H wrote:
On Wed, 17 Jun 2009 12:22:59 -0400, Gene Kearns





wrote:
On Wed, 17 Jun 2009 11:27:48 -0400, John H penned the following well
considered thoughts to the readers of rec.boats:

|On Wed, 17 Jun 2009 11:02:47 -0400, Keith Nuttle
wrote:
|
|HK wrote:
|http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r8M_B23dHco
|
|
| Smart company...
|
|It is ironic that a person who sails supports windmills. *Don't they
|remember the hours that they have sat on their boats on a windless
|summer evening.
|
|Do they think that the windmills will produce energy when there is not
|enough wind to move their boats?
|
|Thank God we're not as stupid as the liberal French making 80% of
|their electricity from nuclear energy!

I'm gonna lean toward the ultraconservatives and vote for wind. I
currently pay two power bills. The nuclear fuel one is 30% higher than
the fossil fuel one and that doesn't account for finally paying the
piper and figuring out what to do with all of the warehoused spent
fuel waste.....

I wonder how old is the technology behind that power plant?

http://tinyurl.com/czv338

*Also, how much does your nuclear plant contribute to global warming?
Which will kill off the population sooner, melting ice caps or the
disposal of what is now a very small amount of waste from nuclear
plants. Al Gore would have us believe we should be buying caskets
already.


So do you not believe that man made global warming is real because the
right tells you to think that?

Do you reckon this is just smoke and mirrors? Why?
http://abcnews.go.com/Video/playerIndex?id=7856609

Here's the full report, please keep an open mind, read what the
scientists are saying. It take awhile, it's 270 some pages long:

http://downloads.globalchange.gov/us...cts-report.pdf

Tiara making...windmills...
 

On Wed, 17 Jun 2009 12:33:40 -0700 (PDT), Loogypicker
wrote:

On Jun 17, 1:30*pm, John H wrote:
On Wed, 17 Jun 2009 12:22:59 -0400, Gene Kearns





wrote:
On Wed, 17 Jun 2009 11:27:48 -0400, John H penned the following well
considered thoughts to the readers of rec.boats:

|On Wed, 17 Jun 2009 11:02:47 -0400, Keith Nuttle
wrote:
|
|HK wrote:
|http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r8M_B23dHco
|
|
| Smart company...
|
|It is ironic that a person who sails supports windmills. *Don't they
|remember the hours that they have sat on their boats on a windless
|summer evening.
|
|Do they think that the windmills will produce energy when there is not
|enough wind to move their boats?
|
|Thank God we're not as stupid as the liberal French making 80% of
|their electricity from nuclear energy!

I'm gonna lean toward the ultraconservatives and vote for wind. I
currently pay two power bills. The nuclear fuel one is 30% higher than
the fossil fuel one and that doesn't account for finally paying the
piper and figuring out what to do with all of the warehoused spent
fuel waste.....

I wonder how old is the technology behind that power plant?

http://tinyurl.com/czv338

*Also, how much does your nuclear plant contribute to global warming?
Which will kill off the population sooner, melting ice caps or the
disposal of what is now a very small amount of waste from nuclear
plants. Al Gore would have us believe we should be buying caskets
already.


So do you not believe that man made global warming is real because the
right tells you to think that?

Do you reckon this is just smoke and mirrors? Why?
http://abcnews.go.com/Video/playerIndex?id=7856609

Here's the full report, please keep an open mind, read what the
scientists are saying. It take awhile, it's 270 some pages long:

http://downloads.globalchange.gov/us...cts-report.pdf

--
John H

"Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the
gospel of envy, its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery."

Churchill

Tiara making...windmills...
 

On Wed, 17 Jun 2009 12:33:40 -0700 (PDT), Loogypicker
wrote:

On Jun 17, 1:30*pm, John H wrote:
On Wed, 17 Jun 2009 12:22:59 -0400, Gene Kearns





wrote:
On Wed, 17 Jun 2009 11:27:48 -0400, John H penned the following well
considered thoughts to the readers of rec.boats:

|On Wed, 17 Jun 2009 11:02:47 -0400, Keith Nuttle
wrote:
|
|HK wrote:
|http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r8M_B23dHco
|
|
| Smart company...
|
|It is ironic that a person who sails supports windmills. *Don't they
|remember the hours that they have sat on their boats on a windless
|summer evening.
|
|Do they think that the windmills will produce energy when there is not
|enough wind to move their boats?
|
|Thank God we're not as stupid as the liberal French making 80% of
|their electricity from nuclear energy!

I'm gonna lean toward the ultraconservatives and vote for wind. I
currently pay two power bills. The nuclear fuel one is 30% higher than
the fossil fuel one and that doesn't account for finally paying the
piper and figuring out what to do with all of the warehoused spent
fuel waste.....

I wonder how old is the technology behind that power plant?

http://tinyurl.com/czv338

*Also, how much does your nuclear plant contribute to global warming?
Which will kill off the population sooner, melting ice caps or the
disposal of what is now a very small amount of waste from nuclear
plants? Al Gore would have us believe we should be buying caskets
already.


So do you not believe that man made global warming is real because the
right tells you to think that?

Do you reckon this is just smoke and mirrors? Why?
http://abcnews.go.com/Video/playerIndex?id=7856609

Here's the full report, please keep an open mind, read what the
scientists are saying. It take awhile, it's 270 some pages long:

http://downloads.globalchange.gov/us...cts-report.pdf

Loogy, go back and re-read my post. I make no proclamations about the
validity of Al Gore's claims.

I asked a question.
--
John H

"Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the
gospel of envy, its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery."

Churchill

Tiara making...windmills...
 

On Jun 17, 3:55*pm, John H wrote:
On Wed, 17 Jun 2009 12:33:40 -0700 (PDT), Loogypicker





wrote:
On Jun 17, 1:30*pm, John H wrote:
On Wed, 17 Jun 2009 12:22:59 -0400, Gene Kearns

wrote:
On Wed, 17 Jun 2009 11:27:48 -0400, John H penned the following well
considered thoughts to the readers of rec.boats:

|On Wed, 17 Jun 2009 11:02:47 -0400, Keith Nuttle
wrote:
|
|HK wrote:
|http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r8M_B23dHco
|
|
| Smart company...
|
|It is ironic that a person who sails supports windmills. *Don't they
|remember the hours that they have sat on their boats on a windless
|summer evening.
|
|Do they think that the windmills will produce energy when there is not
|enough wind to move their boats?
|
|Thank God we're not as stupid as the liberal French making 80% of
|their electricity from nuclear energy!

I'm gonna lean toward the ultraconservatives and vote for wind. I
currently pay two power bills. The nuclear fuel one is 30% higher than
the fossil fuel one and that doesn't account for finally paying the
piper and figuring out what to do with all of the warehoused spent
fuel waste.....

I wonder how old is the technology behind that power plant?

http://tinyurl.com/czv338

*Also, how much does your nuclear plant contribute to global warming?
Which will kill off the population sooner, melting ice caps or the
disposal of what is now a very small amount of waste from nuclear
plants? Al Gore would have us believe we should be buying caskets
already.

So do you not believe that man made global warming is real because the
right tells you to think that?

Do you reckon this is just smoke and mirrors? Why?
http://abcnews.go.com/Video/playerIndex?id=7856609

Here's the full report, please keep an open mind, read what the
scientists are saying. It take awhile, it's 270 some pages long:

http://downloads.globalchange.gov/us...e-impacts-repo...

Loogy, go back and re-read my post. I make no proclamations about the
validity of Al Gore's claims.

You certainly have in the past, I didn't know your stance had changed,
although I'm glad it has!

Tiara making...windmills...
 

On Wed, 17 Jun 2009 13:19:23 -0700 (PDT), Loogypicker
wrote:

On Jun 17, 3:55*pm, John H wrote:
On Wed, 17 Jun 2009 12:33:40 -0700 (PDT), Loogypicker





wrote:
On Jun 17, 1:30*pm, John H wrote:
On Wed, 17 Jun 2009 12:22:59 -0400, Gene Kearns

wrote:
On Wed, 17 Jun 2009 11:27:48 -0400, John H penned the following well
considered thoughts to the readers of rec.boats:

|On Wed, 17 Jun 2009 11:02:47 -0400, Keith Nuttle
wrote:
|
|HK wrote:
|http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r8M_B23dHco
|
|
| Smart company...
|
|It is ironic that a person who sails supports windmills. *Don't they
|remember the hours that they have sat on their boats on a windless
|summer evening.
|
|Do they think that the windmills will produce energy when there is not
|enough wind to move their boats?
|
|Thank God we're not as stupid as the liberal French making 80% of
|their electricity from nuclear energy!

I'm gonna lean toward the ultraconservatives and vote for wind. I
currently pay two power bills. The nuclear fuel one is 30% higher than
the fossil fuel one and that doesn't account for finally paying the
piper and figuring out what to do with all of the warehoused spent
fuel waste.....

I wonder how old is the technology behind that power plant?

http://tinyurl.com/czv338

*Also, how much does your nuclear plant contribute to global warming?
Which will kill off the population sooner, melting ice caps or the
disposal of what is now a very small amount of waste from nuclear
plants? Al Gore would have us believe we should be buying caskets
already.

So do you not believe that man made global warming is real because the
right tells you to think that?

Do you reckon this is just smoke and mirrors? Why?
http://abcnews.go.com/Video/playerIndex?id=7856609

Here's the full report, please keep an open mind, read what the
scientists are saying. It take awhile, it's 270 some pages long:

http://downloads.globalchange.gov/us...e-impacts-repo...

Loogy, go back and re-read my post. I make no proclamations about the
validity of Al Gore's claims.

You certainly have in the past, I didn't know your stance had changed,
although I'm glad it has!

I made no comments about my stance one way or the other. Read the
post.

I asked questions.


--
John H

"Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the
gospel of envy, its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery."

Churchill

Tiara making...windmills...
 

Loogypicker wrote:
On Jun 17, 1:30 pm, John H wrote:
On Wed, 17 Jun 2009 12:22:59 -0400, Gene Kearns





wrote:
On Wed, 17 Jun 2009 11:27:48 -0400, John H penned the following well
considered thoughts to the readers of rec.boats:
|On Wed, 17 Jun 2009 11:02:47 -0400, Keith Nuttle
wrote:
|
|HK wrote:
|http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r8M_B23dHco
|
|
| Smart company...
|
|It is ironic that a person who sails supports windmills. Don't they
|remember the hours that they have sat on their boats on a windless
|summer evening.
|
|Do they think that the windmills will produce energy when there is not
|enough wind to move their boats?
|
|Thank God we're not as stupid as the liberal French making 80% of
|their electricity from nuclear energy!
I'm gonna lean toward the ultraconservatives and vote for wind. I
currently pay two power bills. The nuclear fuel one is 30% higher than
the fossil fuel one and that doesn't account for finally paying the
piper and figuring out what to do with all of the warehoused spent
fuel waste.....
I wonder how old is the technology behind that power plant?

http://tinyurl.com/czv338

Also, how much does your nuclear plant contribute to global warming?
Which will kill off the population sooner, melting ice caps or the
disposal of what is now a very small amount of waste from nuclear
plants. Al Gore would have us believe we should be buying caskets
already.


So do you not believe that man made global warming is real because the
right tells you to think that?

Do you reckon this is just smoke and mirrors? Why?
http://abcnews.go.com/Video/playerIndex?id=7856609

Here's the full report, please keep an open mind, read what the
scientists are saying. It take awhile, it's 270 some pages long:

http://downloads.globalchange.gov/us...cts-report.pdf

For every pro global warming article there is one that shows the
opposite. Global warming is basically a computer model that some people
have been trying to prove for several years. What you don't read about
in the government press is the glaciers that are expanding, the cold
ocean currents that are getting stronger, or the sunspot cycles that
control the weather.

In the reports from the scientist that I have read there is a lot of
questionable science, such as the one reporting an increasing acidity of
the ocean. The differences they were claiming was global warming was
the variance in the standards used to calibrate their meters used to
take the readings.

Tiara making...windmills...
 

On Wed, 17 Jun 2009 22:50:09 -0400, wrote:

On Wed, 17 Jun 2009 12:33:40 -0700 (PDT), Loogypicker
wrote:

*Also, how much does your nuclear plant contribute to global warming?
Which will kill off the population sooner, melting ice caps or the
disposal of what is now a very small amount of waste from nuclear
plants. Al Gore would have us believe we should be buying caskets
already.


So do you not believe that man made global warming is real because the
right tells you to think that?

Warming does seem to be real, even that man contributed to it seems
real. The operative question is how much can we actually do about it.
The warming trend tracks population and the rise of agriculture as
closely as any other metric.
I suppose the upcoming thermonuclear war will trim off a significant
portion of the population and the particulates in the air will knock
down a lot of that greenhouse effect so all will be well.
If our luck holds from the last two world wars we may actually be able
to fight this on the other side of the planet too.
I hope that "On the Beach" stuff isn't true.
I am long on Ambex stock tho, just in case ;-)

I wonder, where is the outrage at stories like this:

http://www.mariri.net/content/view/28/1/


--
John H

"Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the
gospel of envy, its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery."

Churchill

Tiara making...windmills...
 

John H wrote:

I wonder, where is the outrage at stories like this:

http://www.mariri.net/content/view/28/1/


--
John H

"Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the
gospel of envy, its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery."

Churchill

More profit to be found in acai berries. Hucksters are squeezing the
juice and selling it for about $$35$$ per bottle. The poor SA harvesters
are probably reaping pennies per bushel to collect the berries.
Now that's a story the old hairball can sink his tooth into.

Tiara making...windmills...
 

On Jun 17, 4:31*pm, John H wrote:
On Wed, 17 Jun 2009 13:19:23 -0700 (PDT), Loogypicker





wrote:
On Jun 17, 3:55*pm, John H wrote:
On Wed, 17 Jun 2009 12:33:40 -0700 (PDT), Loogypicker

wrote:
On Jun 17, 1:30*pm, John H wrote:
On Wed, 17 Jun 2009 12:22:59 -0400, Gene Kearns

wrote:
On Wed, 17 Jun 2009 11:27:48 -0400, John H penned the following well
considered thoughts to the readers of rec.boats:

|On Wed, 17 Jun 2009 11:02:47 -0400, Keith Nuttle
wrote:
|
|HK wrote:
|http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r8M_B23dHco
|
|
| Smart company...
|
|It is ironic that a person who sails supports windmills. *Don't they
|remember the hours that they have sat on their boats on a windless
|summer evening.
|
|Do they think that the windmills will produce energy when there is not
|enough wind to move their boats?
|
|Thank God we're not as stupid as the liberal French making 80% of
|their electricity from nuclear energy!

I'm gonna lean toward the ultraconservatives and vote for wind. I
currently pay two power bills. The nuclear fuel one is 30% higher than
the fossil fuel one and that doesn't account for finally paying the
piper and figuring out what to do with all of the warehoused spent
fuel waste.....

I wonder how old is the technology behind that power plant?

http://tinyurl.com/czv338

*Also, how much does your nuclear plant contribute to global warming?
Which will kill off the population sooner, melting ice caps or the
disposal of what is now a very small amount of waste from nuclear
plants? Al Gore would have us believe we should be buying caskets
already.

So do you not believe that man made global warming is real because the
right tells you to think that?

Do you reckon this is just smoke and mirrors? Why?
http://abcnews.go.com/Video/playerIndex?id=7856609

Here's the full report, please keep an open mind, read what the
scientists are saying. It take awhile, it's 270 some pages long:

http://downloads.globalchange.gov/us...e-impacts-repo....

Loogy, go back and re-read my post. I make no proclamations about the
validity of Al Gore's claims.

You certainly have in the past, I didn't know your stance had changed,
although I'm glad it has!

I made no comments about my stance one way or the other. Read the
post.

I asked questions.

--
John H

As I said, you have many times before, right here in rec.boats made a
stance and negated the validity of Gore's claims.

Tiara making...windmills...
 

On Thu, 18 Jun 2009 05:16:50 -0700 (PDT), Loogypicker
wrote:

On Jun 17, 4:31*pm, John H wrote:
On Wed, 17 Jun 2009 13:19:23 -0700 (PDT), Loogypicker





wrote:
On Jun 17, 3:55*pm, John H wrote:
On Wed, 17 Jun 2009 12:33:40 -0700 (PDT), Loogypicker

wrote:
On Jun 17, 1:30*pm, John H wrote:
On Wed, 17 Jun 2009 12:22:59 -0400, Gene Kearns

wrote:
On Wed, 17 Jun 2009 11:27:48 -0400, John H penned the following well
considered thoughts to the readers of rec.boats:

|On Wed, 17 Jun 2009 11:02:47 -0400, Keith Nuttle
wrote:
|
|HK wrote:
|http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r8M_B23dHco
|
|
| Smart company...
|
|It is ironic that a person who sails supports windmills. *Don't they
|remember the hours that they have sat on their boats on a windless
|summer evening.
|
|Do they think that the windmills will produce energy when there is not
|enough wind to move their boats?
|
|Thank God we're not as stupid as the liberal French making 80% of
|their electricity from nuclear energy!

I'm gonna lean toward the ultraconservatives and vote for wind. I
currently pay two power bills. The nuclear fuel one is 30% higher than
the fossil fuel one and that doesn't account for finally paying the
piper and figuring out what to do with all of the warehoused spent
fuel waste.....

I wonder how old is the technology behind that power plant?

http://tinyurl.com/czv338

*Also, how much does your nuclear plant contribute to global warming?
Which will kill off the population sooner, melting ice caps or the
disposal of what is now a very small amount of waste from nuclear
plants? Al Gore would have us believe we should be buying caskets
already.

So do you not believe that man made global warming is real because the
right tells you to think that?

Do you reckon this is just smoke and mirrors? Why?
http://abcnews.go.com/Video/playerIndex?id=7856609

Here's the full report, please keep an open mind, read what the
scientists are saying. It take awhile, it's 270 some pages long:

http://downloads.globalchange.gov/us...e-impacts-repo...

Loogy, go back and re-read my post. I make no proclamations about the
validity of Al Gore's claims.

You certainly have in the past, I didn't know your stance had changed,
although I'm glad it has!

I made no comments about my stance one way or the other. Read the
post.

I asked questions.

--
John H

As I said, you have many times before, right here in rec.boats made a
stance and negated the validity of Gore's claims.

I asked questions, which you have yet to address. Why? They're valid
questions.

As to Gore's claims - they are pure adulterated bull**** with almost
no basis in science. Many, many very gullible people believe them,
which is why Gore is making a big fortune. How much have you
contributed to his companies?
--
John H

I once shook hands with a pudgy guy who:

Sailed from San Francisco to Hawaii.
Rounded Cape Horn, twice.
Transited the Panama Canal.
Has owned more than 20 boats in his lifetime.
Sailed large boats competitively.
Has been hundreds of miles from land in a powerboat
under his command.

And who set a new record for the most distance covered
and most fish caught in the Chesapeake Bay in the shortest
time!

Tiara making...windmills...
 

On Jun 18, 8:25*am, John H wrote:
On Thu, 18 Jun 2009 05:16:50 -0700 (PDT), Loogypicker





wrote:
On Jun 17, 4:31*pm, John H wrote:
On Wed, 17 Jun 2009 13:19:23 -0700 (PDT), Loogypicker

wrote:
On Jun 17, 3:55*pm, John H wrote:
On Wed, 17 Jun 2009 12:33:40 -0700 (PDT), Loogypicker

wrote:
On Jun 17, 1:30*pm, John H wrote:
On Wed, 17 Jun 2009 12:22:59 -0400, Gene Kearns

wrote:
On Wed, 17 Jun 2009 11:27:48 -0400, John H penned the following well
considered thoughts to the readers of rec.boats:

|On Wed, 17 Jun 2009 11:02:47 -0400, Keith Nuttle
wrote:
|
|HK wrote:
|http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r8M_B23dHco
|
|
| Smart company...
|
|It is ironic that a person who sails supports windmills. *Don't they
|remember the hours that they have sat on their boats on a windless
|summer evening.
|
|Do they think that the windmills will produce energy when there is not
|enough wind to move their boats?
|
|Thank God we're not as stupid as the liberal French making 80% of
|their electricity from nuclear energy!

I'm gonna lean toward the ultraconservatives and vote for wind. I
currently pay two power bills. The nuclear fuel one is 30% higher than
the fossil fuel one and that doesn't account for finally paying the
piper and figuring out what to do with all of the warehoused spent
fuel waste.....

I wonder how old is the technology behind that power plant?

http://tinyurl.com/czv338

*Also, how much does your nuclear plant contribute to global warming?
Which will kill off the population sooner, melting ice caps or the
disposal of what is now a very small amount of waste from nuclear
plants? Al Gore would have us believe we should be buying caskets
already.

So do you not believe that man made global warming is real because the
right tells you to think that?

Do you reckon this is just smoke and mirrors? Why?
http://abcnews.go.com/Video/playerIndex?id=7856609

Here's the full report, please keep an open mind, read what the
scientists are saying. It take awhile, it's 270 some pages long:

http://downloads.globalchange.gov/us...e-impacts-repo...

Loogy, go back and re-read my post. I make no proclamations about the
validity of Al Gore's claims.

You certainly have in the past, I didn't know your stance had changed,
although I'm glad it has!

I made no comments about my stance one way or the other. Read the
post.

I asked questions.

--
John H

As I said, you have many times before, right here in rec.boats made a
stance and negated the validity of Gore's claims.

I asked questions, which you have yet to address. Why? They're valid
questions.

As to Gore's claims - they are pure adulterated bull**** with almost
no basis in science. Many, many very gullible people believe them,
which is why Gore is making a big fortune. How much have you
contributed to his companies?
--
John H


I take it you didn't bother reading the entire NOAA findings?

Tiara making...windmills...
 

On Thu, 18 Jun 2009 10:21:40 -0700 (PDT), Loogypicker
wrote:

On Jun 18, 8:25*am, John H wrote:
On Thu, 18 Jun 2009 05:16:50 -0700 (PDT), Loogypicker





wrote:
On Jun 17, 4:31*pm, John H wrote:
On Wed, 17 Jun 2009 13:19:23 -0700 (PDT), Loogypicker

wrote:
On Jun 17, 3:55*pm, John H wrote:
On Wed, 17 Jun 2009 12:33:40 -0700 (PDT), Loogypicker

wrote:
On Jun 17, 1:30*pm, John H wrote:
On Wed, 17 Jun 2009 12:22:59 -0400, Gene Kearns

wrote:
On Wed, 17 Jun 2009 11:27:48 -0400, John H penned the following well
considered thoughts to the readers of rec.boats:

|On Wed, 17 Jun 2009 11:02:47 -0400, Keith Nuttle
wrote:
|
|HK wrote:
|http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r8M_B23dHco
|
|
| Smart company...
|
|It is ironic that a person who sails supports windmills. *Don't they
|remember the hours that they have sat on their boats on a windless
|summer evening.
|
|Do they think that the windmills will produce energy when there is not
|enough wind to move their boats?
|
|Thank God we're not as stupid as the liberal French making 80% of
|their electricity from nuclear energy!

I'm gonna lean toward the ultraconservatives and vote for wind. I
currently pay two power bills. The nuclear fuel one is 30% higher than
the fossil fuel one and that doesn't account for finally paying the
piper and figuring out what to do with all of the warehoused spent
fuel waste.....

I wonder how old is the technology behind that power plant?

http://tinyurl.com/czv338

*Also, how much does your nuclear plant contribute to global warming?
Which will kill off the population sooner, melting ice caps or the
disposal of what is now a very small amount of waste from nuclear
plants? Al Gore would have us believe we should be buying caskets
already.

So do you not believe that man made global warming is real because the
right tells you to think that?

Do you reckon this is just smoke and mirrors? Why?
http://abcnews.go.com/Video/playerIndex?id=7856609

Here's the full report, please keep an open mind, read what the
scientists are saying. It take awhile, it's 270 some pages long:

http://downloads.globalchange.gov/us...e-impacts-repo...

Loogy, go back and re-read my post. I make no proclamations about the
validity of Al Gore's claims.

You certainly have in the past, I didn't know your stance had changed,
although I'm glad it has!

I made no comments about my stance one way or the other. Read the
post.

I asked questions.

--
John H

As I said, you have many times before, right here in rec.boats made a
stance and negated the validity of Gore's claims.

I asked questions, which you have yet to address. Why? They're valid
questions.

As to Gore's claims - they are pure adulterated bull**** with almost
no basis in science. Many, many very gullible people believe them,
which is why Gore is making a big fortune. How much have you
contributed to his companies?
--
John H


I take it you didn't bother reading the entire NOAA findings?

I take it you can't answer my questions?
--

John H