![]() |
Story, photos of unusual boats on parade
|
Story, photos of unusual boats on parade
HK wrote in
: http://www.startribune.com/local/wes...ArksUUUycaEacy Unic I've never understood why old powerboats often have such pronounced tumblehome at the transom. Was it style, or was there a performance reason? |
Story, photos of unusual boats on parade
On Jun 3, 10:15*am, Jim Willemin
wrote: HK wrote : http://www.startribune.com/local/wes...ArksUUUycaEacy Unic I've never understood why old powerboats often have such pronounced tumblehome at the transom. *Was it style, or was there a performance reason? Harry doesn't know. However, he'll google it up and act like he does. |
Story, photos of unusual boats on parade
Jim Willemin wrote:
HK wrote in : http://www.startribune.com/local/wes...ArksUUUycaEacy Unic I've never understood why old powerboats often have such pronounced tumblehome at the transom. Was it style, or was there a performance reason? It was for show, not go. Lovely lines. |
Story, photos of unusual boats on parade
On Jun 3, 1:44*pm, Jim Willemin wrote:
wrote : On Jun 3, 10:15*am, Jim Willemin wrote: HK wrote innews:LdedneHfZedT-bvXnZ2dnUVZ_g-dnZ2d @earthlink.com: http://www.startribune.com/local/wes...=KArksUUUycaEa c y Unic I've never understood why old powerboats often have such pronounced tumblehome at the transom. *Was it style, or was there a performance reason? Harry doesn't know. However, he'll google it up and act like he does. Do you have a substantive answer to my question?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Yes, stability. |
Story, photos of unusual boats on parade
On Wed, 03 Jun 2009 09:15:38 -0500, Jim Willemin
wrote: I've never understood why old powerboats often have such pronounced tumblehome at the transom. Was it style, or was there a performance reason? Maybe both. Older powerboats had less horsepower available to them so speed depended on building boats that moved easily through the water, similar in some respects to sailboats. The most efficient shape is long and narrow like a torpedo or fish, however on a boat it is water line length that is important, not length on deck. Extending the water line aft but disguising it with reverse sheer can give a somewhat sleeker appearance with improved speed potential. On sailboats a reverse transom sheer also reduces weight in the stern which decreases pitching when going through waves. |
Story, photos of unusual boats on parade
Wayne.B wrote in
: On Wed, 03 Jun 2009 09:15:38 -0500, Jim Willemin wrote: I've never understood why old powerboats often have such pronounced tumblehome at the transom. Was it style, or was there a performance reason? Maybe both. Older powerboats had less horsepower available to them so speed depended on building boats that moved easily through the water, similar in some respects to sailboats. The most efficient shape is long and narrow like a torpedo or fish, however on a boat it is water line length that is important, not length on deck. Extending the water line aft but disguising it with reverse sheer can give a somewhat sleeker appearance with improved speed potential. On sailboats a reverse transom sheer also reduces weight in the stern which decreases pitching when going through waves. Hmm. I hadn't thought of the weight distribution aspect. Lots of tumblehome would necessarily limit the amount of weight that could be carried on deck, or in an aft cockpit while maintaining waterline beam. Looking at the photo of _Posh_ in the link in the OP, it seems that she carries very little deadrise at the transom and not all that much draft which would not make a lot of sense in a full-displacement boat like a sailboat or Whitehall skiff (i.e. one limited by hull speed). This suggests to me that she has the ability to plane, or at least go faster than her wake. Thinking about planing boats, it seems that most carry their full beam all the way aft, probably for stability. So if you need the beam for stability at speed, but want to discourage half a dozen portly gentlemen with beer from hanging out on the fantail for weight distribution reasons, then a lot of tumblehome at the transom makes sense, at least in something as big as _Posh_ (51 feet). Very clever, our ancestors... |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:55 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com