I don't get it...
 

Seriously.

In CT, we've had voter identification for years - you have to have a
driver's license, state ID or identification (like a letter or
utilities bill with your name and address on it) to be allowed to
vote.

http://www3.signonsandiego.com/stori...checks-060109/

I wonder why, with all the other states being challenged for the exact
same voting requirements, CT has never been challenged on this.

Interesting.

I don't get it...
 

Wizard of Woodstock wrote:
Seriously.

In CT, we've had voter identification for years - you have to have a
driver's license, state ID or identification (like a letter or
utilities bill with your name and address on it) to be allowed to
vote.

http://www3.signonsandiego.com/stori...checks-060109/

I wonder why, with all the other states being challenged for the exact
same voting requirements, CT has never been challenged on this.

Interesting.

Because you are not trying to implement it today.

I don't get it...
 

On Jun 3, 7:25*am, Wizard of Woodstock wrote:
Seriously.

In CT, we've had voter identification for years - you have to have a
driver's license, state ID or identification (like a letter or
utilities bill with your name and address on it) to be allowed to
vote.

http://www3.signonsandiego.com/stori...oting-checks-0...

I wonder why, with all the other states being challenged for the exact
same voting requirements, CT has never been challenged on this.

Interesting.

If you look carefully, solid blue states all have very strict voter
ID, they don't want any voter fraud so they can keep their advantage.
At the same time the red states all have problems getting it passed,
and you will of course notice those are the states where ACORN and
others like them do most of their dirty work.

I don't get it...
 

wrote:
On Jun 3, 7:25 am, Wizard of Woodstock wrote:
Seriously.

In CT, we've had voter identification for years - you have to have a
driver's license, state ID or identification (like a letter or
utilities bill with your name and address on it) to be allowed to
vote.

http://www3.signonsandiego.com/stori...oting-checks-0...

I wonder why, with all the other states being challenged for the exact
same voting requirements, CT has never been challenged on this.

Interesting.

If you look carefully, solid blue states all have very strict voter
ID, they don't want any voter fraud so they can keep their advantage.
At the same time the red states all have problems getting it passed,
and you will of course notice those are the states where ACORN and
others like them do most of their dirty work.


Gawd almighty, you are the most incoherent, dumbest, lamest piece of
**** who has ever posted here, and that's saying something.

I don't get it...
 

On Jun 3, 7:50*am, HK wrote:
wrote:
On Jun 3, 7:25 am, Wizard of Woodstock wrote:
Seriously.

In CT, we've had voter identification for years - you have to have a
driver's license, state ID or identification (like a letter or
utilities bill with your name and address on it) to be allowed to
vote.

http://www3.signonsandiego.com/stori...oting-checks-0....

I wonder why, with all the other states being challenged for the exact
same voting requirements, CT has never been challenged on this.

Interesting.

If you look carefully, solid blue states all have very strict voter
ID, they don't want any voter fraud so they can keep their advantage.
At the same time the red states all have problems getting it passed,
and you will of course notice those are the states where ACORN and
others like them do most of their dirty work.

Gawd almighty, you are the most incoherent, dumbest, lamest piece of
**** who has ever posted here, and that's saying something.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

LOL, right...

I don't get it...
 

wrote:
On Jun 3, 7:50 am, HK wrote:
wrote:
On Jun 3, 7:25 am, Wizard of Woodstock wrote:
Seriously.
In CT, we've had voter identification for years - you have to have a
driver's license, state ID or identification (like a letter or
utilities bill with your name and address on it) to be allowed to
vote.
http://www3.signonsandiego.com/stori...oting-checks-0...
I wonder why, with all the other states being challenged for the exact
same voting requirements, CT has never been challenged on this.
Interesting.
If you look carefully, solid blue states all have very strict voter
ID, they don't want any voter fraud so they can keep their advantage.
At the same time the red states all have problems getting it passed,
and you will of course notice those are the states where ACORN and
others like them do most of their dirty work.
Gawd almighty, you are the most incoherent, dumbest, lamest piece of
**** who has ever posted here, and that's saying something.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

LOL, right...


Shouldn't you be out stalking another abortion provider?

I don't get it...
 

On Jun 3, 8:01*am, HK wrote:
wrote:
On Jun 3, 7:50 am, HK wrote:
wrote:
On Jun 3, 7:25 am, Wizard of Woodstock wrote:
Seriously.
In CT, we've had voter identification for years - you have to have a
driver's license, state ID or identification (like a letter or
utilities bill with your name and address on it) to be allowed to
vote.
http://www3.signonsandiego.com/stori...oting-checks-0....
I wonder why, with all the other states being challenged for the exact
same voting requirements, CT has never been challenged on this.
Interesting.
If you look carefully, solid blue states all have very strict voter
ID, they don't want any voter fraud so they can keep their advantage.
At the same time the red states all have problems getting it passed,
and you will of course notice those are the states where ACORN and
others like them do most of their dirty work.
Gawd almighty, you are the most incoherent, dumbest, lamest piece of
**** who has ever posted here, and that's saying something.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

LOL, right...

Shouldn't you be out stalking another abortion provider?- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

"another abortion provider"? Who was the first one that you claim he's
stalked, liar?