|
Once in a lifetime for golfers
On May 27, 9:35*pm, "Don White" wrote:
"HK" wrote in message m... Don White wrote: "John H" wrote in message . .. snip I mentioned the RAV4 to my younger daughter. She wouldn't think of owning one. Her comment, "Dad, that's a *pansy* car!" I just thought I'd share that with you. snip John H That's really too bad and an indicator of why the American Auto Industry is in such bad shape. You should be more responsible in providing fatherly advice. What do you think a US gallon of gas will cost in a couple of years after the recovery? It's too bad the ejaculates who whine about the RAV4 know very little about it. Car and Driver magazine likes it: "The RAV4 is a C/D favorite, having won a recent comparison test of eight of its competitors as well as back-to-back 5Best Trucks awards. What we like most about the RAV4 is its refined, carlike demeanor. Available in front-wheel drive or all-wheel drive, the RAV4 isn’t exactly ready to conquer serious off-road trails, but its ground clearance and all-wheel drive do allow it to tackle inclement weather with ease. The excellent fuel economy of the four-cylinder, decent driving dynamics, and massive interior space put the RAV4 at the head of its class. The V-6–powered model is a rocket, but may be overkill for most buyers." Consumer Reports has it at the top of the small SUVs and at least two Canadian cable auto programs rate it tops. Johnny & his Dope Army irregulars are probably stuck in the 1st or 2nd generation version. Mine is the 3rd generation and this year they gave us a larger engine with 13 more horsepower. Johnny PrepH may not know that my '09 RAV4 4 cylinder has 26% more power than my old Plymouth Voyager with it's 3.0 V6 and 21% more than my '06 Ranger PU with its 3.0 V6.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - From Popular Mechanics magazine: http://www.popularmechanics.com/auto...s/1270976.html Which says in part: Cute, reliable and loaded with personality, the RAV4 seems to appeal especially to women–at least based on the results of our questionnaire. In our survey, female owners/drivers outnumbered their male counterparts by a 2:1 ratio Yeah, that sounds manly! From http://au.toyotaownersclub.com/forum...howtopic=21311 I've always seen a Rav4 as a hairdressers car? But it has been changing recently Yeah, that's manly! From: http://www.roadandtravel.com/roadtes...e/2002rav4.htm The RAV4 of the late nineties was one of the earliest of the new generation of compact SUVs, its cutesy looks and frugal powertrain striking a popular chord with sorority girls and single moms everywhere, and within months challenging the VW Cabriolet for its "chick-car" tiara. HEEEEHEEE!!!!! From: http://www.cars.com/go/crp/research....&revlogtype=22 Toyota says about 65 percent of RAV4 buyers are expected to be women ages 25-45 Need any more? |
Once in a lifetime for golfers
On May 28, 8:06*am, wrote:
On May 27, 9:35*pm, "Don White" wrote: "HK" wrote in message om... Don White wrote: "John H" wrote in message . .. snip I mentioned the RAV4 to my younger daughter. She wouldn't think of owning one. Her comment, "Dad, that's a *pansy* car!" I just thought I'd share that with you. snip John H That's really too bad and an indicator of why the American Auto Industry is in such bad shape. You should be more responsible in providing fatherly advice. What do you think a US gallon of gas will cost in a couple of years after the recovery? It's too bad the ejaculates who whine about the RAV4 know very little about it. Car and Driver magazine likes it: "The RAV4 is a C/D favorite, having won a recent comparison test of eight of its competitors as well as back-to-back 5Best Trucks awards. What we like most about the RAV4 is its refined, carlike demeanor. Available in front-wheel drive or all-wheel drive, the RAV4 isn’t exactly ready to conquer serious off-road trails, but its ground clearance and all-wheel drive do allow it to tackle inclement weather with ease. The excellent fuel economy of the four-cylinder, decent driving dynamics, and massive interior space put the RAV4 at the head of its class. The V-6–powered model is a rocket, but may be overkill for most buyers." Consumer Reports has it at the top of the small SUVs and at least two Canadian cable auto programs rate it tops. Johnny & his Dope Army irregulars are probably stuck in the 1st or 2nd generation version. Mine is the 3rd generation and this year they gave us a larger engine with 13 more horsepower. Johnny PrepH may not know that my '09 RAV4 4 cylinder has 26% more power than my old Plymouth Voyager with it's 3.0 V6 and 21% more than my '06 Ranger PU with its 3.0 V6.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - From Popular Mechanics magazine:http://www.popularmechanics.com/auto...s/1270976.html Which says in part: Cute, reliable and loaded with personality, the RAV4 seems to appeal especially to women–at least based on the results of our questionnaire. In our survey, female owners/drivers outnumbered their male counterparts by a 2:1 ratio Yeah, that sounds manly! Fromhttp://au.toyotaownersclub.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=21311 I've always seen a Rav4 as a hairdressers car? But it has been changing recently Yeah, that's manly! From:http://www.roadandtravel.com/roadtes...2buyersguide/2... The RAV4 of the late nineties was one of the earliest of the new generation of compact SUVs, its cutesy looks and frugal powertrain striking a popular chord with sorority girls and single moms everywhere, and within months challenging the VW Cabriolet for its "chick-car" tiara. HEEEEHEEE!!!!! From:http://www.cars.com/go/crp/research....&makeid=47&mod... Toyota says about 65 percent of RAV4 buyers are expected to be women ages 25-45 Need any more?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - LOL... |
Once in a lifetime for golfers
On May 28, 8:27*am, HK wrote:
wrote: On May 28, 8:06 am, wrote: On May 27, 9:35 pm, "Don White" wrote: "HK" wrote in message news:656dnVq7MZk6VoDXnZ2dnUVZ_hhi4p2d@earthlink .com... Don White wrote: "John H" wrote in message om... snip I mentioned the RAV4 to my younger daughter. She wouldn't think of owning one. Her comment, "Dad, that's a *pansy* car!" I just thought I'd share that with you. snip John H That's really too bad and an indicator of why the American Auto Industry is in such bad shape. You should be more responsible in providing fatherly advice. What do you think a US gallon of gas will cost in a couple of years after the recovery? It's too bad the ejaculates who whine about the RAV4 know very little about it. Car and Driver magazine likes it: "The RAV4 is a C/D favorite, having won a recent comparison test of eight of its competitors as well as back-to-back 5Best Trucks awards. What we like most about the RAV4 is its refined, carlike demeanor. Available in front-wheel drive or all-wheel drive, the RAV4 isn’t exactly ready to conquer serious off-road trails, but its ground clearance and all-wheel drive do allow it to tackle inclement weather with ease. The excellent fuel economy of the four-cylinder, decent driving dynamics, and massive interior space put the RAV4 at the head of its class. The V-6–powered model is a rocket, but may be overkill for most buyers." Consumer Reports has it at the top of the small SUVs and at least two Canadian cable auto programs rate it tops. Johnny & his Dope Army irregulars are probably stuck in the 1st or 2nd generation version. Mine is the 3rd generation and this year they gave us a larger engine with 13 more horsepower. Johnny PrepH may not know that my '09 RAV4 4 cylinder has 26% more power than my old Plymouth Voyager with it's 3.0 V6 and 21% more than my '06 Ranger PU with its 3.0 V6.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - From Popular Mechanics magazine:http://www.popularmechanics.com/auto...s/1270976.html Which says in part: Cute, reliable and loaded with personality, the RAV4 seems to appeal especially to women–at least based on the results of our questionnaire. In our survey, female owners/drivers outnumbered their male counterparts by a 2:1 ratio Yeah, that sounds manly! Fromhttp://au.toyotaownersclub.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=21311 I've always seen a Rav4 as a hairdressers car? But it has been changing recently Yeah, that's manly! From:http://www.roadandtravel.com/roadtes...2buyersguide/2... The RAV4 of the late nineties was one of the earliest of the new generation of compact SUVs, its cutesy looks and frugal powertrain striking a popular chord with sorority girls and single moms everywhere, and within months challenging the VW Cabriolet for its "chick-car" tiara. HEEEEHEEE!!!!! From:http://www.cars.com/go/crp/research....&makeid=47&mod... Toyota says about 65 percent of RAV4 buyers are expected to be women ages 25-45 Need any more?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - LOL... What are you driving these days, ****-for-brains? A '91 Ford station wagon?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Brand new Dodge Quad Cab, dark blue. Tow package that includes larger alternator, larger radiator, upgraded brakes, and stiffer leaf springs. Bed liner, and Truxedo bed cover. |
Once in a lifetime for golfers
"HK" wrote in message ... What are you driving these days, ****-for-brains? A '91 Ford station wagon? What's the matter with a '91 Ford wagon? They were great cars, especially the mid 80's and up models. 1991 was the last year they were produced and you still see many on the road, even up here in salt laden MA. They have strong frames, are multi-purposed, make great tow vehicles and ride nicely. They are one of Ford's success stories and if I had a late 80's or '90-'91 in good shape, I'd probably hold onto it. Eisboch |
Once in a lifetime for golfers
Eisboch wrote:
"HK" wrote in message ... What are you driving these days, ****-for-brains? A '91 Ford station wagon? What's the matter with a '91 Ford wagon? They were great cars, especially the mid 80's and up models. 1991 was the last year they were produced and you still see many on the road, even up here in salt laden MA. They have strong frames, are multi-purposed, make great tow vehicles and ride nicely. They are one of Ford's success stories and if I had a late 80's or '90-'91 in good shape, I'd probably hold onto it. Eisboch Nothing wrong with it, unless you are making ****ty remarks about a new Toyota. The Ford is not a car I would own, but that's what once made America a great place...diversity of opinion. |
Once in a lifetime for golfers
"HK" wrote in message m... ........ but that's what once made America a great place...diversity of opinion. For some reason it seems odd to read that, coming from you. Eisboch |
Once in a lifetime for golfers
Eisboch wrote:
"HK" wrote in message m... ........ but that's what once made America a great place...diversity of opinion. For some reason it seems odd to read that, coming from you. Eisboch It shouldn't. I'm all for diversity of opinion. As an example, while I disagee with you on many points political, I don't begrudge you holding those views, nor do I think you should adopt my views, unless you want to do so, and vice versa. Note that I don't get "upset" with you because of your views, though you sometimes get upset with me because of my views. As an example, *I* am pro-choice. But a lot of people in this country are not. Well, I wouldn't pretend to shove my views on that topic down their throats. I expect the same courtesy from them. I want no impediments place in front of women who want an abortion. If someone is opposed to abortion, I want no legislation passed that would force them to get one. On the other hand, I am also anti-torture, and I want legal impediments placed in front of anyone in authority who would engage in it. I could present a detailed rationale for each of my positions, but this is, after all, rec.boats, and it makes no sense to dangle thoughts in front of the likes of JustHate, Loogy, and the rest of the retards. |
Once in a lifetime for golfers
HK wrote:
Eisboch wrote: "HK" wrote in message ... What are you driving these days, ****-for-brains? A '91 Ford station wagon? What's the matter with a '91 Ford wagon? They were great cars, especially the mid 80's and up models. 1991 was the last year they were produced and you still see many on the road, even up here in salt laden MA. They have strong frames, are multi-purposed, make great tow vehicles and ride nicely. They are one of Ford's success stories and if I had a late 80's or '90-'91 in good shape, I'd probably hold onto it. Eisboch Nothing wrong with it, unless you are making ****ty remarks about a new Toyota. The Ford is not a car I would own, but that's what once made America a great place...diversity of opinion. Hold onto that last thought. Coming from you, it's a gem. |
Once in a lifetime for golfers
HK wrote:
Eisboch wrote: "HK" wrote in message m... ........ but that's what once made America a great place...diversity of opinion. For some reason it seems odd to read that, coming from you. Eisboch It shouldn't. I'm all for diversity of opinion. As an example, while I disagee with you on many points political, I don't begrudge you holding those views, nor do I think you should adopt my views, unless you want to do so, and vice versa. Note that I don't get "upset" with you because of your views, though you sometimes get upset with me because of my views. As an example, *I* am pro-choice. But a lot of people in this country are not. Well, I wouldn't pretend to shove my views on that topic down their throats. I expect the same courtesy from them. I want no impediments place in front of women who want an abortion. If someone is opposed to abortion, I want no legislation passed that would force them to get one. On the other hand, I am also anti-torture, and I want legal impediments placed in front of anyone in authority who would engage in it. I could present a detailed rationale for each of my positions, but this is, after all, rec.boats, and it makes no sense to dangle thoughts in front of the likes of JustHate, Loogy, and the rest of the retards. Great idea. Why don't you go dangle your thoughts somewhere else. |
Once in a lifetime for golfers
On May 28, 9:01*am, "Eisboch" wrote:
"HK" wrote in message m... ........ but that's what once made America a great place...diversity of opinion. For some reason it seems odd to read that, coming from you. Eisboch Exactly. Harry's the narrow minded person I know of. |
Once in a lifetime for golfers
On May 27, 6:35*pm, John H wrote:
On Wed, 27 May 2009 16:49:09 -0400, HK wrote: Vic Smith wrote: On Wed, 27 May 2009 16:11:16 -0400, HK wrote: I couldn't believe those posts when I saw them, but he repeated those sorts of posts several times... Herring is a racist. You don't know that. Yeah, I do. He has made openly and overly racist remarks about blacks and Latinos. Post 'em, liar. This'll be fun to see! -- John H Yep, as usual, he's lying. |
Once in a lifetime for golfers
On May 27, 7:24*pm, HK wrote:
Don White wrote: "John H" wrote in message .. . snip I mentioned the RAV4 to my younger daughter. She wouldn't think of owning one. Her comment, "Dad, that's a *pansy* car!" I just thought I'd share that with you. snip John H That's really too bad and an indicator of why the American Auto Industry is in such bad shape. You should be more responsible in providing fatherly advice. What do you think a US gallon of gas will cost in a couple of years after the recovery? It's too bad the ejaculates who whine about the RAV4 know very little about it. Car and Driver magazine likes it: "The RAV4 is a C/D favorite, having won a recent comparison test of eight of its competitors as well as back-to-back 5Best Trucks awards. What we like most about the RAV4 is its refined, carlike demeanor. Available in front-wheel drive or all-wheel drive, the RAV4 isn’t exactly ready to conquer serious off-road trails, but its ground clearance and all-wheel drive do allow it to tackle inclement weather with ease. The excellent fuel economy of the four-cylinder, decent driving dynamics, and massive interior space put the RAV4 at the head of its class. The V-6–powered model is a rocket, but may be overkill for most buyers."- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Car and Driver also calls it a "cute-ute"!!!!! http://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/..._v_6_road_test |
Once in a lifetime for golfers
On May 27, 7:13*pm, "Don White" wrote:
"John H" wrote in message ... snip I mentioned the RAV4 to my younger daughter. She wouldn't think of owning one. Her comment, "Dad, that's a *pansy* car!" I just thought I'd share that with you. snip John H That's really too bad and an indicator of why the American Auto Industry is in such bad shape. You should be more responsible in providing fatherly advice. What do you think a US gallon of gas will cost in a couple of years after the recovery? Fatherly advice? She's an adult, and unlike your adult son, is on her own, and can make her own decisions. Do you think John should force her to like something she doesn't like? |
Once in a lifetime for golfers
|
Once in a lifetime for golfers
|
Once in a lifetime for golfers
Richard Casady wrote:
On Thu, 28 May 2009 04:57:11 -0700 (PDT), wrote: I like the RAV4. Typically Toyota - well-designed, nicely assembled, Toyota reliability.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Like you are now a car expert?? Oh, the narcissism! Funny, you're too stupid to know how stupid you're acting! The Toyota landcruiser a friend bought in 1970 came with a starting crank. That is reliable. Starts unaided with a dead battery. A feature that should be common. Casady We have a 2004 4Runner with the V8. More than 110,000 miles. Most reliable car we have ever owned. No expenditures but for routine service, expendables, a set of tires, brake pads, and a battery. Nothing has broken or fallen off. Starts every time, no matter the weather. That's a major reason why I'm looking at a Lexus and the top of the line Toyota sedan. I think the Japanese some time ago passed the Germans as builders of the top-quality cars. |
Once in a lifetime for golfers
On May 28, 1:22*pm, HK wrote:
Richard Casady wrote: On Thu, 28 May 2009 04:57:11 -0700 (PDT), wrote: I like the RAV4. Typically Toyota - well-designed, nicely assembled, Toyota reliability.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Like you are now a car expert?? Oh, the narcissism! Funny, you're too stupid to know how stupid you're acting! The Toyota landcruiser a friend bought in 1970 came with a starting crank. That is reliable. Starts unaided with a dead battery. A feature that should be common. Casady We have a 2004 4Runner with the V8. More than 110,000 miles. Most reliable car we have ever owned. No expenditures but for routine service, expendables, a set of tires, brake pads, and a battery. Nothing has broken or fallen off. Starts every time, no matter the weather. That's a major reason why I'm looking at a Lexus and the top of the line Toyota sedan. I think the Japanese some time ago passed the Germans as builders of the top-quality cars. You've never had a vehicle that went 110k miles without problems before????? Do you union buddies like you driving made in Japan cars? |
Once in a lifetime for golfers
On May 28, 1:06*pm, Richard Casady
wrote: On Thu, 28 May 2009 04:57:11 -0700 (PDT), wrote: I like the RAV4. Typically Toyota - well-designed, nicely assembled, Toyota reliability.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Like you are now a car expert?? Oh, the narcissism! Funny, you're too stupid to know how stupid you're acting! The Toyota landcruiser a friend bought in 1970 came with a starting crank. That is reliable. Starts unaided with a dead battery. A feature that should be common. Casady Yep, back when they were THE vehicle for the desert or bush. The landcruiser, like all Toyotas are now just another road vehicle. |
Once in a lifetime for golfers
On May 28, 11:29*am, jim785 wrote:
wrote: On May 27, 7:13 pm, "Don White" wrote: "John H" wrote in message . .. snip I mentioned the RAV4 to my younger daughter. She wouldn't think of owning one. Her comment, "Dad, that's a *pansy* car!" I just thought I'd share that with you. snip John H That's really too bad and an indicator of why the American Auto Industry is in such bad shape. You should be more responsible in providing fatherly advice. What do you think a US gallon of gas will cost in a couple of years after the recovery? Fatherly advice? She's an adult, and unlike your adult son, is on her own, and can make her own decisions. Do you think John should force her to like something she doesn't like? Did you know that the RAV 4 has 10, count em 10, beverage holders. I'm sure that swayed Donny's buying decision. Also the V6 version can tow 3500 lbs when properly equipped. Sadly the 4 cyl. version can tow only a * lightly loaded Radio Flyer. Donny did opt for the 6 cyl, I trust.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Sweet! I guess, seeing how it seats five, that the other holders are for makeup? |
Once in a lifetime for golfers
"Calif Bill" wrote in message m... "Don White" wrote in message ... "Calif Bill" wrote in message m... But . . . . pink? Why are you 'irregulars' so caught up on pink...I'd have thought the 'rainbow colours' would be your choice. Mine is Pyrite Mica...an earthy, manly colour. Cause any self respecting car will not be PINK! Maybe an elephant during a drinking bout, or a dolphin in the Amazon. But not a car. Well, you'd better give up your night-time job flogging 'Mary K' products. You just might win one of those pink Cadillacs and make JohnnyPrepH as jealous as 'ell! |
Once in a lifetime for golfers
On Thu, 28 May 2009 16:08:41 -0300, "Don White"
wrote: "Calif Bill" wrote in message om... "Don White" wrote in message ... "Calif Bill" wrote in message m... But . . . . pink? Why are you 'irregulars' so caught up on pink...I'd have thought the 'rainbow colours' would be your choice. Mine is Pyrite Mica...an earthy, manly colour. Cause any self respecting car will not be PINK! Maybe an elephant during a drinking bout, or a dolphin in the Amazon. But not a car. Well, you'd better give up your night-time job flogging 'Mary K' products. You just might win one of those pink Cadillacs and make JohnnyPrepH as jealous as 'ell! Pink cars don't make me jealous. Hell, I'm not jealous of yours. I 'spect you're kinda cute running around in that thing. Get hit on much? What kind of flowers have you got on the dashboard? -- John H |
Once in a lifetime for golfers
On Thu, 28 May 2009 05:06:47 -0400, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq."
wrote: Don White wrote: "Calif Bill" wrote in message m... But . . . . pink? Why are you 'irregulars' so caught up on pink...I'd have thought the 'rainbow colours' would be your choice. Mine is Pyrite Mica...an earthy, manly colour. You do seem very hung up on telling us that you are manly, it reminds me of Richard Nixon stating "I am not a crook" or Bill Clinton "I did not have sex with that woman" or a used car lot with a sign saying "Honest John's Used Car Lot". If the guy's name is John, he must be honest. If the sign said 'Honest Harry's Used Car Lot', then I'd worry. -- John H |
Once in a lifetime for golfers
On Thu, 28 May 2009 09:01:07 -0400, "Eisboch"
wrote: "HK" wrote in message om... ........ but that's what once made America a great place...diversity of opinion. For some reason it seems odd to read that, coming from you. Eisboch As Fords will soon be the only American car not built by the government, I can understand a socialist's negativity towards Fords. They probably get ranked right up there with Wal Mart. -- John H |
Once in a lifetime for golfers
|
Once in a lifetime for golfers
On May 28, 9:38*am, jim785 wrote:
HK wrote: Eisboch wrote: "HK" wrote in message ... What are you driving these days, ****-for-brains? A '91 Ford station wagon? What's the matter with a '91 Ford wagon? * They were great cars, especially the mid 80's and up models. * 1991 was the last year they were produced and you still see many on the road, even up here in salt laden MA. * *They have strong frames, are multi-purposed, make great tow vehicles and ride nicely. They are one of Ford's success stories and if I had a late 80's or '90-'91 in good shape, I'd probably hold onto it. Eisboch Nothing wrong with it, unless you are making ****ty remarks about a new Toyota. The Ford is not a car I would own, but that's what once made America a great place...diversity of opinion. Hold onto that last thought. Coming from you, it's a gem.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Makes you wonder why just preceeding this tidbit, that every time someone disagrees with Harry he starts his third grade like name calling and childish insults, huh? |
Once in a lifetime for golfers
Don White wrote:
"HK" wrote in message m... Don White wrote: "John H" wrote in message ... snip I mentioned the RAV4 to my younger daughter. She wouldn't think of owning one. Her comment, "Dad, that's a *pansy* car!" I just thought I'd share that with you. snip John H That's really too bad and an indicator of why the American Auto Industry is in such bad shape. You should be more responsible in providing fatherly advice. What do you think a US gallon of gas will cost in a couple of years after the recovery? It's too bad the ejaculates who whine about the RAV4 know very little about it. Car and Driver magazine likes it: "The RAV4 is a C/D favorite, having won a recent comparison test of eight of its competitors as well as back-to-back 5Best Trucks awards. What we like most about the RAV4 is its refined, carlike demeanor. Available in front-wheel drive or all-wheel drive, the RAV4 isn’t exactly ready to conquer serious off-road trails, but its ground clearance and all-wheel drive do allow it to tackle inclement weather with ease. The excellent fuel economy of the four-cylinder, decent driving dynamics, and massive interior space put the RAV4 at the head of its class. The V-6–powered model is a rocket, but may be overkill for most buyers." Consumer Reports has it at the top of the small SUVs and at least two Canadian cable auto programs rate it tops. Johnny & his Dope Army irregulars are probably stuck in the 1st or 2nd generation version. Mine is the 3rd generation and this year they gave us a larger engine with 13 more horsepower. Johnny PrepH may not know that my '09 RAV4 4 cylinder has 26% more power than my old Plymouth Voyager with it's 3.0 V6 and 21% more than my '06 Ranger PU with its 3.0 V6. Wow! That 179 HP is just a bit more than half of the 350 HP in my SUV and the torque is less than half. What a (chick) machine! You aren't going to try to tow with that, right? |
Once in a lifetime for golfers
jim7856 wrote:
HK wrote: Calif Bill wrote: "Don White" wrote in message ... "HK" wrote in message m... Don White wrote: "John H" wrote in message ... snip I mentioned the RAV4 to my younger daughter. She wouldn't think of owning one. Her comment, "Dad, that's a *pansy* car!" I just thought I'd share that with you. snip John H That's really too bad and an indicator of why the American Auto Industry is in such bad shape. You should be more responsible in providing fatherly advice. What do you think a US gallon of gas will cost in a couple of years after the recovery? It's too bad the ejaculates who whine about the RAV4 know very little about it. Car and Driver magazine likes it: "The RAV4 is a C/D favorite, having won a recent comparison test of eight of its competitors as well as back-to-back 5Best Trucks awards. What we like most about the RAV4 is its refined, carlike demeanor. Available in front-wheel drive or all-wheel drive, the RAV4 isn't exactly ready to conquer serious off-road trails, but its ground clearance and all-wheel drive do allow it to tackle inclement weather with ease. The excellent fuel economy of the four-cylinder, decent driving dynamics, and massive interior space put the RAV4 at the head of its class. The V-6-powered model is a rocket, but may be overkill for most buyers." Consumer Reports has it at the top of the small SUVs and at least two Canadian cable auto programs rate it tops. Johnny & his Dope Army irregulars are probably stuck in the 1st or 2nd generation version. Mine is the 3rd generation and this year they gave us a larger engine with 13 more horsepower. Johnny PrepH may not know that my '09 RAV4 4 cylinder has 26% more power than my old Plymouth Voyager with it's 3.0 V6 and 21% more than my '06 Ranger PU with its 3.0 V6. But . . . . pink? Pink is just another color. I saw a Toyota Camry today with a factory green color that reminded me of...puke. I like the RAV4. Typically Toyota - well-designed, nicely assembled, Toyota reliability. Yup. Cozy up to old Donny. He's all you have left. He's still got JPS tossing his salad. |
Once in a lifetime for golfers
Don White wrote:
"Calif Bill" wrote in message m... But . . . . pink? Why are you 'irregulars' so caught up on pink...I'd have thought the 'rainbow colours' would be your choice. Mine is Pyrite Mica...an earthy, manly colour. Boring color...chick car. |
Once in a lifetime for golfers
HK wrote:
Eisboch wrote: "HK" wrote in message ... What are you driving these days, ****-for-brains? A '91 Ford station wagon? What's the matter with a '91 Ford wagon? They were great cars, especially the mid 80's and up models. 1991 was the last year they were produced and you still see many on the road, even up here in salt laden MA. They have strong frames, are multi-purposed, make great tow vehicles and ride nicely. They are one of Ford's success stories and if I had a late 80's or '90-'91 in good shape, I'd probably hold onto it. Eisboch Nothing wrong with it, unless you are making ****ty remarks about a new Toyota. The Ford is not a car I would own, but that's what once made America a great place...diversity of opinion. Yep. Obama took that away with our money... |
Once in a lifetime for golfers
|
Once in a lifetime for golfers
HK wrote:
Richard Casady wrote: On Thu, 28 May 2009 04:57:11 -0700 (PDT), wrote: I like the RAV4. Typically Toyota - well-designed, nicely assembled, Toyota reliability.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Like you are now a car expert?? Oh, the narcissism! Funny, you're too stupid to know how stupid you're acting! The Toyota landcruiser a friend bought in 1970 came with a starting crank. That is reliable. Starts unaided with a dead battery. A feature that should be common. Casady We have a 2004 4Runner with the V8. More than 110,000 miles. Most reliable car we have ever owned. No expenditures but for routine service, expendables, a set of tires, brake pads, and a battery. Nothing has broken or fallen off. Starts every time, no matter the weather. That's a major reason why I'm looking at a Lexus and the top of the line Toyota sedan. I think the Japanese some time ago passed the Germans as builders of the top-quality cars. That sedan should serve as a fine tow vehicle. |
Once in a lifetime for golfers
Don White wrote:
"Calif Bill" wrote in message m... "Don White" wrote in message ... "Calif Bill" wrote in message m... But . . . . pink? Why are you 'irregulars' so caught up on pink...I'd have thought the 'rainbow colours' would be your choice. Mine is Pyrite Mica...an earthy, manly colour. Cause any self respecting car will not be PINK! Maybe an elephant during a drinking bout, or a dolphin in the Amazon. But not a car. Well, you'd better give up your night-time job flogging 'Mary K' products. You just might win one of those pink Cadillacs and make JohnnyPrepH as jealous as 'ell! Dumb. |
Once in a lifetime for golfers
|
Once in a lifetime for golfers
"John H" wrote in message ... I 'spect you're kinda cute running around in that thing. Get hit on much? What kind of flowers have you got on the dashboard? -- John H Please stop it Johnny...I'm not 'your type'! You're only embarassing yourself. |
Once in a lifetime for golfers
On Thu, 28 May 2009 19:58:14 -0400, D K
wrote: Wow! That 179 HP is just a bit more than half of the 350 HP in my SUV and the torque is less than half. What a (chick) machine! You aren't going to try to tow with that, right? I think the Navigator is rated at 5500. It has 330 cu in and 300 hp. I have a one ton boat and no trailer brakes. The heft it has is more than handy. We tried to pull it behind a Ranger and it didn't like to stop. I have a 94 horse Mercedes that is rated at 150 tons, 300 if you connect the brakes on the railcars. Whatever Casady |
Once in a lifetime for golfers
Richard Casady wrote:
On Thu, 28 May 2009 19:58:14 -0400, D K wrote: Wow! That 179 HP is just a bit more than half of the 350 HP in my SUV and the torque is less than half. What a (chick) machine! You aren't going to try to tow with that, right? I think the Navigator is rated at 5500. It has 330 cu in and 300 hp. I have a one ton boat and no trailer brakes. The heft it has is more than handy. We tried to pull it behind a Ranger and it didn't like to stop. I have a 94 horse Mercedes that is rated at 150 tons, 300 if you connect the brakes on the railcars. Whatever Casady Are we supposed to be impressed that Dickqueless Krueger has an SUV with twice the horsepower of someone else's SUV? Wow...that sure does it for me, but it doesn't change the indisputable fact that Krueger is snarky, worthless piece of ****, and worthy only of being filtered out of usenet. I successfully towed a boat the size and weight of Krueger's behind a V6 Ranger without problems. You don't need a 350 hp SUV to tow a 19-foot boat. |
Once in a lifetime for golfers
"Richard Casady" wrote in message ... On Thu, 28 May 2009 19:58:14 -0400, D K wrote: Wow! That 179 HP is just a bit more than half of the 350 HP in my SUV and the torque is less than half. What a (chick) machine! You aren't going to try to tow with that, right? I think the Navigator is rated at 5500. It has 330 cu in and 300 hp. I have a one ton boat and no trailer brakes. The heft it has is more than handy. We tried to pull it behind a Ranger and it didn't like to stop. Probably depends on the year. I was surprised that my wife's Navigator is "rated" to tow 7400 lbs. Don't think I'd want to though. A Navigator is basically a softly sprung F-150. Eisboch |
Once in a lifetime for golfers
HK wrote:
Richard Casady wrote: On Thu, 28 May 2009 19:58:14 -0400, D K wrote: Wow! That 179 HP is just a bit more than half of the 350 HP in my SUV and the torque is less than half. What a (chick) machine! You aren't going to try to tow with that, right? I think the Navigator is rated at 5500. It has 330 cu in and 300 hp. I have a one ton boat and no trailer brakes. The heft it has is more than handy. We tried to pull it behind a Ranger and it didn't like to stop. I have a 94 horse Mercedes that is rated at 150 tons, 300 if you connect the brakes on the railcars. Whatever Casady Are we supposed to be impressed that Dickqueless Krueger has an SUV with twice the horsepower of someone else's SUV? Wow...that sure does it for me, but it doesn't change the indisputable fact that Krueger is snarky, worthless piece of ****, and worthy only of being filtered out of usenet. I successfully towed a boat the size and weight of Krueger's behind a V6 Ranger without problems. You don't need a 350 hp SUV to tow a 19-foot boat. Of course you don't. My 22HP lawn tractor could pull your Parker. Wheelbase, weight, frame, strength, and brakes are the key issues when selecting a tow vehicle. ALL SUVs are terrible tow vehicles. My wife's, chic car CRV, on the other hand is an excellent towed vehicle. The petrol per KM we get on it is astounding. |
Once in a lifetime for golfers
"HK" wrote in message m... Richard Casady wrote: On Thu, 28 May 2009 19:58:14 -0400, D K wrote: Wow! That 179 HP is just a bit more than half of the 350 HP in my SUV and the torque is less than half. What a (chick) machine! You aren't going to try to tow with that, right? I think the Navigator is rated at 5500. It has 330 cu in and 300 hp. I have a one ton boat and no trailer brakes. The heft it has is more than handy. We tried to pull it behind a Ranger and it didn't like to stop. I have a 94 horse Mercedes that is rated at 150 tons, 300 if you connect the brakes on the railcars. Whatever Casady Are we supposed to be impressed that Dickqueless Krueger has an SUV with twice the horsepower of someone else's SUV? Wow...that sure does it for me, but it doesn't change the indisputable fact that Krueger is snarky, worthless piece of ****, and worthy only of being filtered out of usenet. I successfully towed a boat the size and weight of Krueger's behind a V6 Ranger without problems. You don't need a 350 hp SUV to tow a 19-foot boat. Engine size is a secondary consideration when towing IMO. A Ranger 4 cylinder will tow if you use the appropriate gears. Weight and suspension of the tow vehicle is far more important. A Ranger may be fine for short range towing of 2 or 3 thousand lbs, but I'd never attempt long range, highway speed trips. They just aren't made for it. The last Ranger I had was the "beefed up" Level Two version that had a heavier duty suspension and tow package. It was rated for about 6,000 lbs, IIRC. It still was not a safe truck for highway towing purposes, even with a light trailer and load, which is why I traded it in for a F-250. Huge difference. Funny thing is, the V6 Ranger only got about 3-4 mpg better gas mileage than the F-250 achieves. I may be a bit picky, but I've done quite a bit of long range towing over the past 5 or 6 years. Learned my lesson. For example, the little Sprinter RV with a 154hp diesel tows up to 5000 lbs effortlessly and it's handling is virtually unaffected by the weight of the trailer. Eisboch |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:44 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com