| Home | 
| Search | 
| Today's Posts | 
| 
		 
			 
			#8  
			
			
			 
		   
			
			
		 | 
|||
		
		
  | 
|||
| 
		
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			You're far better off with a blower.  Turbos have a lag problem as another 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	poster pointed out. There is the prop issue because you'll have to run a really high pitch for when the turbo kicks in which will make it a dog out of the hole. You also have to deal with a water cooled exhaust system. And heat issues. A 144 or 177 blower will give you the same boost without any of these problems. "Hemicuda" wrote in message om... Has anyone tried turbocharging a 5.0 L or 5.7 L Merc engine in this group? I know that it used to be done back in the 70's but I can't find any info about any current set-ups. From what I can find it seems like it might be advantageous by allowing you to run a better pitch prop for higher top end speed and reduced RPMs for cruising which seem like it would be good for efficiency and engine life. I don't think it would drop your low end that much because the compression on stock marine engines is close to 9:1 and you can probably run 10PSI of boost on 8.5:1 engines. Any thoughts or comments? I am more familiar with turbo applications on cars so I might be missing something. Thanks for the help!  | 
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread | 
| Display Modes | |
		
  | 
	
		 | 
			 
			Similar Threads
		 | 
	||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Usage of motoroil | General | |||
| Flushing engine stored in Salt Water | General | |||
| ENGINE OVERHEAT | General | |||
| marine engine repair schools? | General | |||
| Volvo Penta (EFI) engine starting problem | General | |||