On May 19, 6:47*am, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq."
wrote:
jps wrote:
On Mon, 18 May 2009 23:11:38 -0400, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq."
wrote:

Johnson wrote:
jps wrote:

And were you saying the same when Bush was on the road to spending 2
to 3 trillion prosecuting a war in Iraq?
We weren't discussing Bush. We were discussing Obama's spending.

Your attention span seems to indicate ADD, if not immaturity.

Johnson
He is not worth the effort to try to discuss anything. * ADD is the
least of his problems.

That you're both "conservatives" is the least of your problems.

Those that want to bitch about Obama's rampant spending need to bring
credentials proving they were also alarmed by Bush handing out
trillions in tax breaks to millionaires -- financed by debt to the
Chinese.

Without that credibility, the complaint is purely partisan and
bull****.

End of story.

Got any credibility? *Don't think so.

This is not a discussion, just a basis of fact.

You have NEVER heard me bitch about any of Obama's policies, even if I
don't agree with all of them. *I DID and still do bitch about Bush's
deficient spending, extremely poor choice of cabinet members, and an
administration that entered into a war, without any real objectives, and
no exit strategy. As far as their fiscal policies, the Bush
Administration behaved like a drunken sailor on shore leave. I have and
will continue to complain about the rampant growth of our national debt,
under ANY administration. *I absolutely would NEVER be described as a
conservative, at least not as the word conservative is used today, and I
probably wouldn't even be described as a conservative in Goldwater's
era. * I did vote for Obama, even though like most voters, I do not
agree, with all of his programs and long term goals. *I thought the
Republicans seemed to be floundering around, being pulled and tugged at
by special interest groups, even more than the Democrats.

So my complaint about you having ADD and coming into rec.boats behaving
like a psychotic street corner preacher, yelling at all of the
pedestrians as they walk by, have NOTHING to do with partisan
"bull****". * It is just an accurate description of your behavior.

--
Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq.

This Newsgroup post is a natural product. The slight variations in
spelling and grammar enhance its individual character and beauty and in
no way are to be considered flaws or defects- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Pffftttt... JPS talking about credibility..LOL! Next, he will be
quoting Harry!!