BoatBanter.com

BoatBanter.com (https://www.boatbanter.com/)
-   General (https://www.boatbanter.com/general/)
-   -   These are crazy times... (https://www.boatbanter.com/general/104766-these-crazy-times.html)

Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq.[_5_] May 16th 09 04:02 AM

These are crazy times...
 
DK wrote:
jps wrote:
On Fri, 15 May 2009 16:30:52 -0400, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq."
wrote:

jps wrote:
On Fri, 15 May 2009 13:22:32 -0400, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq."
wrote:

jps wrote:
On Fri, 15 May 2009 07:57:48 -0400, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq."
wrote:

jps wrote:
On Fri, 15 May 2009 00:23:01 -0400, "Reginald P. Smithers III,
Esq."
wrote:

jps wrote:

Carry on...
On that basis, I'm a piker compared to you.

You are a scum bag who uses poster's candid personal information
against them.

Low, scummy, piece 'o crap.
I missed the start of this thread, but are you talking about
Harry again?
No, DicK has been after Don about his son. It's low, poor
sportsmanship and consistent with the penile cranium which is DK.
Sorry, my bad. It does sound like your believe anyone who uses
candid personal information against them is a low life, scummy
piece of crap dick head. Is that correct?
Now I know who you are.
Yes, I am Reggie, but you didn't answer my question.
You may call yourself Reggie but you're not the same Reggie.

A little pattern recognition goes a long way.
jps,

Sorry to screw up your theory, but except for two "Reggie" posts made
by a jovial impostor about two weeks ago, you will see that I am
using the exact same IP as Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq. has been
using for years.

Nope, I am me, and ..... "I am he as you are he as you are me and we
are all together.
See how they run like pigs from a gun, see how they fly." .....

But back to the original question: It does sound like your believe
anyone who uses candid
personal information against them is a low life, scummy piece of crap
dick head. Is that correct?


Sorry "Reggie", not buying.


So you are incapable of reading headers?

You people...


I am curious why he thinks I am an impostor Reggie, and what is
different in my writing style. But if he knew how to read headers, he
could check the IP. Giganews would catch someone spoofing an IP in a
heartbeat, and if jps would forward the spoofed IP to Comcast and
Giganews, I would lose both my ISP and my newsgroup server. I also
believe it is a federal law against spoofing IP, so I could be in real
trouble.

--
Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq.

This Newsgroup post is a natural product. The slight variations in
spelling and grammar enhance its individual character and beauty and in
no way are to be considered flaws or defects

jps May 16th 09 04:22 AM

These are crazy times...
 
On Fri, 15 May 2009 22:56:55 -0400, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq."
wrote:

jps wrote:
On Fri, 15 May 2009 20:43:47 -0400, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq."
wrote:

For every post I make, you call 10 people assholes, dick heads etc and
as you agreed you are crude because they are dumb and need to be slap
upside the head, but that is just you doing you civic duty. Is that
correct?


You don't post anything that isn't a buttsniff.

You're like a dog that's only mission in life is to annoy other dogs
by cramming your nose into their anus for a good whiff.

Is that your civic duty?


No, I have been asking you a simple question, you seem to be the one
sniffing very strongly behind me. Would it be better if I did nothing
but hurl 5th grade expletives towards anyone I disagree with, and ignore
the obnoxious behavior of those I agree with?


You don't understand the concept. You add nothing to the dialogue.

You don't field arguments about anything. Vapid, void, empty. You
pursue a hobby of buttsniffing.

You do your little netcop thing if it floats your boat.

Would you like a badge and little hat to wear? I'm happy to go down
to the Toys R Us and grab 'em for you.

I don't care about your real name, just provide your address and I'll
get 'em on the way tomorrow.

jps May 16th 09 04:25 AM

These are crazy times...
 
On Fri, 15 May 2009 23:02:10 -0400, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq."
wrote:


I am curious why he thinks I am an impostor Reggie, and what is
different in my writing style. But if he knew how to read headers, he
could check the IP. Giganews would catch someone spoofing an IP in a
heartbeat, and if jps would forward the spoofed IP to Comcast and
Giganews, I would lose both my ISP and my newsgroup server. I also
believe it is a federal law against spoofing IP, so I could be in real
trouble.


Show me your IP address genius...

Path:
forte-easynews!core-iad-easynews!news-in-02-iad.easynews.com!209.197.12.246.MISMATCH!nx02.iad0 1.newshosting.com!newshosting.com!novia!border2.nn tp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!backlog2.nnt p.dca.giganews.com!news.giganews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 22:02:10 -0500
Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 23:02:10 -0400
From: "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq."
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (Windows/20090302)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: rec.boats
Subject: These are crazy times...
References:











In-Reply-To:
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 090515-0, 05/15/2009), Outbound message
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
Message-ID:
Lines: 75
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
X-Trace:
sv3-s0SCc5h8XERrPe8ig/CcUK9UZ5UT/3dusayNSnIvRq3Ko196LOhAWFaYY6s7do7Y1IQwomDgW8vo76s !mFxF6EWrHTPuJafuXzVqA+V6dEI0Hjn4PIQeFwA/4eaYeINB/tGQ65Ia2I0xhn3DOhyuXlbKv5gd
X-Complaints-To:
X-DMCA-Notifications:
http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your
complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.39

Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq.[_5_] May 16th 09 11:13 AM

These are crazy times...
 
jps wrote:
On Fri, 15 May 2009 22:56:55 -0400, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq."
wrote:

jps wrote:
On Fri, 15 May 2009 20:43:47 -0400, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq."
wrote:

For every post I make, you call 10 people assholes, dick heads etc and
as you agreed you are crude because they are dumb and need to be slap
upside the head, but that is just you doing you civic duty. Is that
correct?
You don't post anything that isn't a buttsniff.

You're like a dog that's only mission in life is to annoy other dogs
by cramming your nose into their anus for a good whiff.

Is that your civic duty?

No, I have been asking you a simple question, you seem to be the one
sniffing very strongly behind me. Would it be better if I did nothing
but hurl 5th grade expletives towards anyone I disagree with, and ignore
the obnoxious behavior of those I agree with?


You don't understand the concept. You add nothing to the dialogue.

You don't field arguments about anything. Vapid, void, empty. You
pursue a hobby of buttsniffing.

You do your little netcop thing if it floats your boat.

Would you like a badge and little hat to wear? I'm happy to go down
to the Toys R Us and grab 'em for you.

I don't care about your real name, just provide your address and I'll
get 'em on the way tomorrow.


jps,

I think you need to go back and read this thread, you have become
totally confused or are having a serous senior moment. You are the
person who was the Netcop, chastising someone for discussing a subject
you thought was inappropriate for the newsgroup. I just repeated your
statement back to you, to highlight how foolish it was, because that is
Harry's MO on 99% of his post, and your MO on over 50% of your post.

Now if you think you are actually having a dialogue, you are completely
delusional. Throwing out a long line of expletives, with an occasional
high 5 to Harry is not the definition of a dialogue. Using your
definition of "butt sniffing" what you are doing is butt sniffing most
of the other dogs in rec.boats. I don't think many would consider your
posts anything but vapid, void and empty outburst, similar to what one
might see from a downtown street corner preacher or psychotic.

It is possible that you don't understand the definition of dialogue, so
here is the definition of dialogue as it relates to this discussion: "an
exchange of ideas or opinions on a particular issue, esp. a political or
religious issue, with a view to reaching an amicable agreement or
settlement." With the exception of few individuals, there are very
few dialogues in rec.boats. Mostly we have insults and name calling
and chest pounding.

Now I have tried to have a dialogue with you in this thread, but you
seem to intent to divert the dialogue back to what you are comfortable
with, a series of insults.

--
Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq.

This Newsgroup post is a natural product. The slight variations in
spelling and grammar enhance its individual character and beauty and in
no way are to be considered flaws or defects

Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq.[_5_] May 16th 09 11:32 AM

These are crazy times...
 
jps wrote:
On Fri, 15 May 2009 23:02:10 -0400, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq."
wrote:


I am curious why he thinks I am an impostor Reggie, and what is
different in my writing style. But if he knew how to read headers, he
could check the IP. Giganews would catch someone spoofing an IP in a
heartbeat, and if jps would forward the spoofed IP to Comcast and
Giganews, I would lose both my ISP and my newsgroup server. I also
believe it is a federal law against spoofing IP, so I could be in real
trouble.


Show me your IP address genius...


I stand corrected, and do apologize. While most ISP Usenet servers
always include an IP in the headers, it appears that GigaNews sometimes
includes a IP address and other times they do not.

If you prefer to believe that I am an impostor Reggie, feel free. We
can pretend that the old Reggie died, and I stole his ID. Now most
people who know me from this Newsgroup and via email discussion on other
topics, would disagree with you. But then again, this is Usenet so that
is the norm.

--
Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq.

This Newsgroup post is a natural product. The slight variations in
spelling and grammar enhance its individual character and beauty and in
no way are to be considered flaws or defects

Wizard of Woodstock May 16th 09 11:57 AM

These are crazy times...
 
On Sat, 16 May 2009 06:32:36 -0400, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq."
wrote:

If you prefer to believe that I am an impostor Reggie, feel free. We
can pretend that the old Reggie died, and I stole his ID. Now most
people who know me from this Newsgroup and via email discussion on other
topics, would disagree with you. But then again, this is Usenet so that
is the norm.


What these dumbasses didn't figure out is that the other Reggie went
by Reginald J. Smithers, IIII.

Clowns.

HK May 16th 09 12:08 PM

These are crazy times...
 
Wizard of Woodstock wrote:
On Sat, 16 May 2009 06:32:36 -0400, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq."
wrote:

If you prefer to believe that I am an impostor Reggie, feel free. We
can pretend that the old Reggie died, and I stole his ID. Now most
people who know me from this Newsgroup and via email discussion on other
topics, would disagree with you. But then again, this is Usenet so that
is the norm.


What these dumbasses didn't figure out is that the other Reggie went
by Reginald J. Smithers, IIII.

Clowns.


What some dumbasses here didn't figure out is that "Reggie" changes his
handles at least as often as you change your socks. He's had close to 50
variations on the "Reggie" handle here, Mr. Bipolar Superhero.

Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq.[_5_] May 16th 09 12:36 PM

These are crazy times...
 
HK wrote:
Wizard of Woodstock wrote:
On Sat, 16 May 2009 06:32:36 -0400, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq."
wrote:

If you prefer to believe that I am an impostor Reggie, feel free. We
can pretend that the old Reggie died, and I stole his ID. Now most
people who know me from this Newsgroup and via email discussion on
other topics, would disagree with you. But then again, this is
Usenet so that is the norm.


What these dumbasses didn't figure out is that the other Reggie went
by Reginald J. Smithers, IIII.

Clowns.


What some dumbasses here didn't figure out is that "Reggie" changes his
handles at least as often as you change your socks. He's had close to 50
variations on the "Reggie" handle here, Mr. Bipolar Superhero.


Harry Krause,
You have changed your handle just as many times, you have actually
posted under 3 or 4 different handles in one day. Your HK handle is a
fairly new handle for you.

--
Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq.

This Newsgroup post is a natural product. The slight variations in
spelling and grammar enhance its individual character and beauty and in
no way are to be considered flaws or defects

Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq.[_5_] May 16th 09 12:38 PM

These are crazy times...
 
Wizard of Woodstock wrote:
On Sat, 16 May 2009 06:32:36 -0400, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq."
wrote:

If you prefer to believe that I am an impostor Reggie, feel free. We
can pretend that the old Reggie died, and I stole his ID. Now most
people who know me from this Newsgroup and via email discussion on other
topics, would disagree with you. But then again, this is Usenet so that
is the norm.


What these dumbasses didn't figure out is that the other Reggie went
by Reginald J. Smithers, IIII.

Clowns.


Many people have wondered why I named my son the forth, when he does not
have the same middle name. I did that because I can. ;)

--
Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq.

This Newsgroup post is a natural product. The slight variations in
spelling and grammar enhance its individual character and beauty and in
no way are to be considered flaws or defects

jps May 16th 09 05:22 PM

These are crazy times...
 
On Sat, 16 May 2009 06:13:22 -0400, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq."
wrote:

jps wrote:
On Fri, 15 May 2009 22:56:55 -0400, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq."
wrote:

jps wrote:
On Fri, 15 May 2009 20:43:47 -0400, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq."
wrote:

For every post I make, you call 10 people assholes, dick heads etc and
as you agreed you are crude because they are dumb and need to be slap
upside the head, but that is just you doing you civic duty. Is that
correct?
You don't post anything that isn't a buttsniff.

You're like a dog that's only mission in life is to annoy other dogs
by cramming your nose into their anus for a good whiff.

Is that your civic duty?
No, I have been asking you a simple question, you seem to be the one
sniffing very strongly behind me. Would it be better if I did nothing
but hurl 5th grade expletives towards anyone I disagree with, and ignore
the obnoxious behavior of those I agree with?


You don't understand the concept. You add nothing to the dialogue.

You don't field arguments about anything. Vapid, void, empty. You
pursue a hobby of buttsniffing.

You do your little netcop thing if it floats your boat.

Would you like a badge and little hat to wear? I'm happy to go down
to the Toys R Us and grab 'em for you.

I don't care about your real name, just provide your address and I'll
get 'em on the way tomorrow.


jps,

I think you need to go back and read this thread, you have become
totally confused or are having a serous senior moment. You are the
person who was the Netcop, chastising someone for discussing a subject
you thought was inappropriate for the newsgroup. I just repeated your
statement back to you, to highlight how foolish it was, because that is
Harry's MO on 99% of his post, and your MO on over 50% of your post.

Now if you think you are actually having a dialogue, you are completely
delusional. Throwing out a long line of expletives, with an occasional
high 5 to Harry is not the definition of a dialogue. Using your
definition of "butt sniffing" what you are doing is butt sniffing most
of the other dogs in rec.boats. I don't think many would consider your
posts anything but vapid, void and empty outburst, similar to what one
might see from a downtown street corner preacher or psychotic.

It is possible that you don't understand the definition of dialogue, so
here is the definition of dialogue as it relates to this discussion: "an
exchange of ideas or opinions on a particular issue, esp. a political or
religious issue, with a view to reaching an amicable agreement or
settlement." With the exception of few individuals, there are very
few dialogues in rec.boats. Mostly we have insults and name calling
and chest pounding.

Now I have tried to have a dialogue with you in this thread, but you
seem to intent to divert the dialogue back to what you are comfortable
with, a series of insults.


You're wasting your time.


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:04 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com