These are crazy times...
 

On May 13, 10:50*pm, Tim wrote:
On May 13, 10:10*pm, HK wrote:

Tim wrote:
Try skiing though this.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GGSczGAQ6D4

It can be done,

What's the point of that boat, to have a boat that is as visually
annoying as an unmuffled "Cigarette" boat is aurally annoying? * :)

Well, some people like old station wagons, some people like
Porches,and Corvettes.

They're a lot of fun when you like performance though.

BTW, they guys boat I was talking about would plane out in 3 sec, and
hit a top end of 78 mph in 7 sec.

heck of a ride!

These are crazy times...
 

HK wrote:
Tim wrote:
Try skiing though this.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GGSczGAQ6D4

It can be done,


What's the point of that boat, to have a boat that is as visually
annoying as an unmuffled "Cigarette" boat is aurally annoying? :)

It's a ski boat Harry. The point of the boat is that it is probably very
good at pulling multiple skiers through the water at varying speeds with
varying wake patterns and even rooster tails to delight onlookers.
Another good point is that it annoys you. Get the point now, Dickweed.

These are crazy times...
 

jim78565 wrote:
HK wrote:
Tim wrote:
Try skiing though this.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GGSczGAQ6D4

It can be done,


What's the point of that boat, to have a boat that is as visually
annoying as an unmuffled "Cigarette" boat is aurally annoying? :)

It's a ski boat Harry. The point of the boat is that it is probably very
good at pulling multiple skiers through the water at varying speeds with
varying wake patterns and even rooster tails to delight onlookers.
Another good point is that it annoys you. Get the point now, Dickweed.

Really, all anyone needs is a 21' Parker. Anything bigger or different
should be taxed off the waterways.

Except if you own a 36' Zimmerman like Lobster Boat, and that would be
exempt from all taxes. How can you tax what you can not see?
-
Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq.

This Newsgroup post is a natural product. The slight variations in
spelling and grammar enhance its individual character and beauty and in
no way are to be considered flaws or defects

These are crazy times...
 

On May 14, 4:31*am, jim78565 wrote:
HK wrote:
Tim wrote:
Try skiing though this.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GGSczGAQ6D4

It can be done,

What's the point of that boat, to have a boat that is as visually
annoying as an unmuffled "Cigarette" boat is aurally annoying? * :)

It's a ski boat Harry. The point of the boat is that it is probably very
good at pulling multiple skiers through the water at varying speeds with
varying wake patterns and even rooster tails to delight onlookers.
Another good point is that it annoys you. Get the point now, Dickweed.

It's the classic if Harry doesn't have it, doesn't want it, no one
should.

These are crazy times...
 

On May 13, 11:10*pm, HK wrote:
Tim wrote:
Try skiing though this.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GGSczGAQ6D4

It can be done,

What's the point of that boat, to have a boat that is as visually
annoying as an unmuffled "Cigarette" boat is aurally annoying? * :)

Being an alleged mechanical engineer you should understand the concept
that some people enjoy working on mechanical things, seeing what they
can get out of them speed wise.

How visually annoying is your 36' Zimmerman like lobster boat? Oh,
wait, it's never been seen!

These are crazy times...
 

"Tim" wrote in message
...
Try skiing though this.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GGSczGAQ6D4

It can be done,

That could probably be used as an inland fireboat.

These are crazy times...
 

jps wrote:
On Wed, 13 May 2009 20:17:02 -0400, DK wrote:

jps wrote:
On Tue, 12 May 2009 20:32:14 -0400, DK wrote:

jps wrote:
On Mon, 11 May 2009 21:02:09 -0400, DK wrote:

Don White wrote:
"jim78565" wrote in message
...
wrote:
On May 10, 11:14 pm, "Don White" wrote:
"John H" wrote in message

...



What you're seeing is the manifestation of Harry's envy the only way
he can. Obviously, Donnie feels the same way. Look at their
relationships with their kids and you can understand why.
The relationship between you and your daughter is a delight to behold.
--
John H
For a great time, go here first...http://tinyurl.com/d3vxvm
Johnny...you still panhandling here?
Don't you have any shame at all? 'Your' charities aren't the only ones
members try to support.
What a bigoted asshole. One can only hope that someday you find
yourself in something similar to what John and his family are going
through, you nasty little piece of ****.
Concise and to the point. I like that.
Are you & LooneyTunes really that stupid.
You think JohnnyH is the only one who has family member suffering through a
crisis?
Don't bother answering...your comments do so for you.

You son's alcoholism and laziness are hardly a crisis, dummy.
You've made ****ing Prick status. Newly elevated from ****ing Dick.
Yay!
Figured that'd be a reason for you to celebrate. Congratulations.
Now that you are "out", I am repulsed by your statements.

You've been outed as a **** hauler. I've been outed as what?

A huge asshole.

Carry on...

These are crazy times...
 

jim78565 wrote:
HK wrote:
Tim wrote:
Try skiing though this.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GGSczGAQ6D4

It can be done,


What's the point of that boat, to have a boat that is as visually
annoying as an unmuffled "Cigarette" boat is aurally annoying? :)

It's a ski boat Harry. The point of the boat is that it is probably very
good at pulling multiple skiers through the water at varying speeds with
varying wake patterns and even rooster tails to delight onlookers.
Another good point is that it annoys you. Get the point now, Dickweed.

I agree with this post.

These are crazy times...
 

Don White wrote:
"Tim" wrote in message
...
Try skiing though this.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GGSczGAQ6D4

It can be done,

That could probably be used as an inland fireboat.



Damn! Dumb Don posted something that was marginally funny!

These are crazy times...
 

On Thu, 14 May 2009 20:34:46 -0400, DK
wrote:

jps wrote:
On Wed, 13 May 2009 20:17:02 -0400, DK wrote:

jps wrote:
On Tue, 12 May 2009 20:32:14 -0400, DK wrote:

jps wrote:
On Mon, 11 May 2009 21:02:09 -0400, DK wrote:

Don White wrote:
"jim78565" wrote in message
...
wrote:
On May 10, 11:14 pm, "Don White" wrote:
"John H" wrote in message

...



What you're seeing is the manifestation of Harry's envy the only way
he can. Obviously, Donnie feels the same way. Look at their
relationships with their kids and you can understand why.
The relationship between you and your daughter is a delight to behold.
--
John H
For a great time, go here first...http://tinyurl.com/d3vxvm
Johnny...you still panhandling here?
Don't you have any shame at all? 'Your' charities aren't the only ones
members try to support.
What a bigoted asshole. One can only hope that someday you find
yourself in something similar to what John and his family are going
through, you nasty little piece of ****.
Concise and to the point. I like that.
Are you & LooneyTunes really that stupid.
You think JohnnyH is the only one who has family member suffering through a
crisis?
Don't bother answering...your comments do so for you.

You son's alcoholism and laziness are hardly a crisis, dummy.
You've made ****ing Prick status. Newly elevated from ****ing Dick.
Yay!
Figured that'd be a reason for you to celebrate. Congratulations.
Now that you are "out", I am repulsed by your statements.

You've been outed as a **** hauler. I've been outed as what?

A huge asshole.

Carry on...

On that basis, I'm a piker compared to you.

You are a scum bag who uses poster's candid personal information
against them.

Low, scummy, piece 'o crap.

These are crazy times...
 

"DK" wrote in message
...
Don White wrote:
"Tim" wrote in message
...
Try skiing though this.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GGSczGAQ6D4

It can be done,

That could probably be used as an inland fireboat.

Damn! Dumb Don posted something that was marginally funny!

Even a blind squirrel gets the occasional nut...

--Mike

These are crazy times...
 

jps wrote:


Carry on...

On that basis, I'm a piker compared to you.

You are a scum bag who uses poster's candid personal information
against them.

Low, scummy, piece 'o crap.

I missed the start of this thread, but are you talking about Harry again?
--
Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq.

This Newsgroup post is a natural product. The slight variations in
spelling and grammar enhance its individual character and beauty and in
no way are to be considered flaws or defects

These are crazy times...
 

On Fri, 15 May 2009 00:23:01 -0400, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq."
wrote:

jps wrote:


Carry on...

On that basis, I'm a piker compared to you.

You are a scum bag who uses poster's candid personal information
against them.

Low, scummy, piece 'o crap.

I missed the start of this thread, but are you talking about Harry again?

No, DicK has been after Don about his son. It's low, poor
sportsmanship and consistent with the penile cranium which is DK.

These are crazy times...
 

jps wrote:
On Fri, 15 May 2009 00:23:01 -0400, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq."
wrote:

jps wrote:

Carry on...
On that basis, I'm a piker compared to you.

You are a scum bag who uses poster's candid personal information
against them.

Low, scummy, piece 'o crap.
I missed the start of this thread, but are you talking about Harry again?

No, DicK has been after Don about his son. It's low, poor
sportsmanship and consistent with the penile cranium which is DK.

Sorry, my bad. It does sound like your believe anyone who uses candid
personal information against them is a low life, scummy piece of crap
dick head. Is that correct?

--
Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq.

This Newsgroup post is a natural product. The slight variations in
spelling and grammar enhance its individual character and beauty and in
no way are to be considered flaws or defects

These are crazy times...
 

On May 15, 12:43*am, jps wrote:
On Fri, 15 May 2009 00:23:01 -0400, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq."

wrote:
jps wrote:

Carry on...

On that basis, I'm a piker compared to you.

You are a scum bag who uses poster's candid personal information
against them.

Low, scummy, piece 'o crap.

I missed the start of this thread, but are you talking about Harry again?

No, DicK has been after Don about his son. *It's low, poor
sportsmanship and consistent with the penile cranium which is DK.

DK has said nothing about Don's son that Don himself hasn't said.

These are crazy times...
 

On May 14, 11:54*pm, "Mike" wrote:
"DK" wrote in message

...

Don White wrote:
"Tim" wrote in message
....
Try skiing though this.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GGSczGAQ6D4

It can be done,

That could probably be used as an inland fireboat.

Damn! *Dumb Don posted something that was marginally funny!

Even a blind squirrel gets the occasional nut...

--Mike

Damn it, you owe me a keyboard and a cup of coffee!!

These are crazy times...
 

On May 14, 1:36*pm, "Don White" wrote:
"Tim" wrote in message

...

Try skiing though this.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GGSczGAQ6D4

It can be done,

That could probably be used as an inland fireboat.

Is that the one that Harry's father got the fireboat welcome from?

These are crazy times...
 

On Fri, 15 May 2009 07:57:48 -0400, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq."
wrote:

jps wrote:
On Fri, 15 May 2009 00:23:01 -0400, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq."
wrote:

jps wrote:

Carry on...
On that basis, I'm a piker compared to you.

You are a scum bag who uses poster's candid personal information
against them.

Low, scummy, piece 'o crap.
I missed the start of this thread, but are you talking about Harry again?

No, DicK has been after Don about his son. It's low, poor
sportsmanship and consistent with the penile cranium which is DK.

Sorry, my bad. It does sound like your believe anyone who uses candid
personal information against them is a low life, scummy piece of crap
dick head. Is that correct?

Now I know who you are.

These are crazy times...
 

jps wrote:
On Fri, 15 May 2009 07:57:48 -0400, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq."
wrote:

jps wrote:
On Fri, 15 May 2009 00:23:01 -0400, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq."
wrote:

jps wrote:

Carry on...
On that basis, I'm a piker compared to you.

You are a scum bag who uses poster's candid personal information
against them.

Low, scummy, piece 'o crap.
I missed the start of this thread, but are you talking about Harry again?
No, DicK has been after Don about his son. It's low, poor
sportsmanship and consistent with the penile cranium which is DK.
Sorry, my bad. It does sound like your believe anyone who uses candid
personal information against them is a low life, scummy piece of crap
dick head. Is that correct?

Now I know who you are.

Yes, I am Reggie, but you didn't answer my question.

--
Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq.

This Newsgroup post is a natural product. The slight variations in
spelling and grammar enhance its individual character and beauty and in
no way are to be considered flaws or defects

These are crazy times...
 

On Fri, 15 May 2009 13:22:32 -0400, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq."
wrote:

jps wrote:
On Fri, 15 May 2009 07:57:48 -0400, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq."
wrote:

jps wrote:
On Fri, 15 May 2009 00:23:01 -0400, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq."
wrote:

jps wrote:

Carry on...
On that basis, I'm a piker compared to you.

You are a scum bag who uses poster's candid personal information
against them.

Low, scummy, piece 'o crap.
I missed the start of this thread, but are you talking about Harry again?
No, DicK has been after Don about his son. It's low, poor
sportsmanship and consistent with the penile cranium which is DK.
Sorry, my bad. It does sound like your believe anyone who uses candid
personal information against them is a low life, scummy piece of crap
dick head. Is that correct?

Now I know who you are.

Yes, I am Reggie, but you didn't answer my question.

You may call yourself Reggie but you're not the same Reggie.

A little pattern recognition goes a long way.

These are crazy times...
 

jps wrote:
On Fri, 15 May 2009 13:22:32 -0400, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq."
wrote:

jps wrote:
On Fri, 15 May 2009 07:57:48 -0400, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq."
wrote:

jps wrote:
On Fri, 15 May 2009 00:23:01 -0400, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq."
wrote:

jps wrote:

Carry on...
On that basis, I'm a piker compared to you.

You are a scum bag who uses poster's candid personal information
against them.

Low, scummy, piece 'o crap.
I missed the start of this thread, but are you talking about Harry again?
No, DicK has been after Don about his son. It's low, poor
sportsmanship and consistent with the penile cranium which is DK.
Sorry, my bad. It does sound like your believe anyone who uses candid
personal information against them is a low life, scummy piece of crap
dick head. Is that correct?
Now I know who you are.
Yes, I am Reggie, but you didn't answer my question.

You may call yourself Reggie but you're not the same Reggie.

A little pattern recognition goes a long way.


You mean, "this" Reggie is more of a dirtbag than the former one? :)

These are crazy times...
 

On Fri, 15 May 2009 14:07:56 -0400, HK wrote:

jps wrote:
On Fri, 15 May 2009 13:22:32 -0400, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq."
wrote:

jps wrote:
On Fri, 15 May 2009 07:57:48 -0400, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq."
wrote:

jps wrote:
On Fri, 15 May 2009 00:23:01 -0400, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq."
wrote:

jps wrote:

Carry on...
On that basis, I'm a piker compared to you.

You are a scum bag who uses poster's candid personal information
against them.

Low, scummy, piece 'o crap.
I missed the start of this thread, but are you talking about Harry again?
No, DicK has been after Don about his son. It's low, poor
sportsmanship and consistent with the penile cranium which is DK.
Sorry, my bad. It does sound like your believe anyone who uses candid
personal information against them is a low life, scummy piece of crap
dick head. Is that correct?
Now I know who you are.
Yes, I am Reggie, but you didn't answer my question.

You may call yourself Reggie but you're not the same Reggie.

A little pattern recognition goes a long way.

You mean, "this" Reggie is more of a dirtbag than the former one? :)

No, less.

These are crazy times...
 

"jps" wrote in message
...
On Fri, 15 May 2009 13:22:32 -0400, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq."
wrote:

jps wrote:
On Fri, 15 May 2009 07:57:48 -0400, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq."
wrote:

jps wrote:
On Fri, 15 May 2009 00:23:01 -0400, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq."
wrote:

jps wrote:

Carry on...
On that basis, I'm a piker compared to you.

You are a scum bag who uses poster's candid personal information
against them.

Low, scummy, piece 'o crap.
I missed the start of this thread, but are you talking about Harry
again?
No, DicK has been after Don about his son. It's low, poor
sportsmanship and consistent with the penile cranium which is DK.
Sorry, my bad. It does sound like your believe anyone who uses candid
personal information against them is a low life, scummy piece of crap
dick head. Is that correct?

Now I know who you are.

Yes, I am Reggie, but you didn't answer my question.

You may call yourself Reggie but you're not the same Reggie.

A little pattern recognition goes a long way.

Could Justhate be correct for once?
As far as Ditzy Dan,,,he doesn't use a little personal information...he
makes up crap about my son & posts it here. That's why he'll never escape
from my septic tank...at least not for long.

These are crazy times...
 

On May 15, 2:33*pm, "Don White" wrote:
"jps" wrote in message

...





On Fri, 15 May 2009 13:22:32 -0400, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq."
wrote:

jps wrote:
On Fri, 15 May 2009 07:57:48 -0400, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq."
wrote:

jps wrote:
On Fri, 15 May 2009 00:23:01 -0400, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq."
wrote:

jps wrote:

Carry on...
On that basis, I'm a piker compared to you.

You are a scum bag who uses poster's candid personal information
against them.

Low, scummy, piece 'o crap.
I missed the start of this thread, but are you talking about Harry
again?
No, DicK has been after Don about his son. *It's low, poor
sportsmanship and consistent with the penile cranium which is DK.
Sorry, my bad. * It does sound like your believe anyone who uses candid
personal information against them is a low life, scummy piece of crap
dick head. * Is that correct?

Now I know who you are.

Yes, I am Reggie, but you didn't answer my question.

You may call yourself Reggie but you're not the same Reggie.

A little pattern recognition goes a long way.

Could Justhate be correct for once?
As far as Ditzy Dan,,,he doesn't use a little personal information...he
makes up crap about my son & posts it here. *That's why he'll never escape
from my septic tank...at least not for long.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

What has DK made up?

These are crazy times...
 

jps wrote:
On Fri, 15 May 2009 13:22:32 -0400, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq."
wrote:

jps wrote:
On Fri, 15 May 2009 07:57:48 -0400, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq."
wrote:

jps wrote:
On Fri, 15 May 2009 00:23:01 -0400, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq."
wrote:

jps wrote:

Carry on...
On that basis, I'm a piker compared to you.

You are a scum bag who uses poster's candid personal information
against them.

Low, scummy, piece 'o crap.
I missed the start of this thread, but are you talking about Harry again?
No, DicK has been after Don about his son. It's low, poor
sportsmanship and consistent with the penile cranium which is DK.
Sorry, my bad. It does sound like your believe anyone who uses candid
personal information against them is a low life, scummy piece of crap
dick head. Is that correct?
Now I know who you are.
Yes, I am Reggie, but you didn't answer my question.

You may call yourself Reggie but you're not the same Reggie.

A little pattern recognition goes a long way.

jps,

Sorry to screw up your theory, but except for two "Reggie" posts made by
a jovial impostor about two weeks ago, you will see that I am using the
exact same IP as Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq. has been using for years.

Nope, I am me, and ..... "I am he as you are he as you are me and we are
all together.
See how they run like pigs from a gun, see how they fly." .....

But back to the original question: It does sound like your believe
anyone who uses candid
personal information against them is a low life, scummy piece of crap
dick head. Is that correct?


--
Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq.

This Newsgroup post is a natural product. The slight variations in
spelling and grammar enhance its individual character and beauty and in
no way are to be considered flaws or defects

These are crazy times...
 

On Fri, 15 May 2009 16:30:52 -0400, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq."
wrote:

jps wrote:
On Fri, 15 May 2009 13:22:32 -0400, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq."
wrote:

jps wrote:
On Fri, 15 May 2009 07:57:48 -0400, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq."
wrote:

jps wrote:
On Fri, 15 May 2009 00:23:01 -0400, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq."
wrote:

jps wrote:

Carry on...
On that basis, I'm a piker compared to you.

You are a scum bag who uses poster's candid personal information
against them.

Low, scummy, piece 'o crap.
I missed the start of this thread, but are you talking about Harry again?
No, DicK has been after Don about his son. It's low, poor
sportsmanship and consistent with the penile cranium which is DK.
Sorry, my bad. It does sound like your believe anyone who uses candid
personal information against them is a low life, scummy piece of crap
dick head. Is that correct?
Now I know who you are.
Yes, I am Reggie, but you didn't answer my question.

You may call yourself Reggie but you're not the same Reggie.

A little pattern recognition goes a long way.

jps,

Sorry to screw up your theory, but except for two "Reggie" posts made by
a jovial impostor about two weeks ago, you will see that I am using the
exact same IP as Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq. has been using for years.

Nope, I am me, and ..... "I am he as you are he as you are me and we are
all together.
See how they run like pigs from a gun, see how they fly." .....

But back to the original question: It does sound like your believe
anyone who uses candid
personal information against them is a low life, scummy piece of crap
dick head. Is that correct?

Sorry "Reggie", not buying.

These are crazy times...
 

jps wrote:
On Fri, 15 May 2009 16:30:52 -0400, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq."
wrote:

jps wrote:
On Fri, 15 May 2009 13:22:32 -0400, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq."
wrote:

jps wrote:
On Fri, 15 May 2009 07:57:48 -0400, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq."
wrote:

jps wrote:
On Fri, 15 May 2009 00:23:01 -0400, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq."
wrote:

jps wrote:

Carry on...
On that basis, I'm a piker compared to you.

It does sound like your believe anyone who uses candid
personal information against them is a low life, scummy piece of crap
dick head. Is that correct?
I missed the start of this thread, but are you talking about Harry again?
No, DicK has been after Don about his son. It's low, poor
sportsmanship and consistent with the penile cranium which is DK.
Sorry, my bad. It does sound like your believe anyone who uses candid
personal information against them is a low life, scummy piece of crap
dick head. Is that correct?
Now I know who you are.
Yes, I am Reggie, but you didn't answer my question.
You may call yourself Reggie but you're not the same Reggie.

A little pattern recognition goes a long way.
jps,

Sorry to screw up your theory, but except for two "Reggie" posts made by
a jovial impostor about two weeks ago, you will see that I am using the
exact same IP as Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq. has been using for years.

Nope, I am me, and ..... "I am he as you are he as you are me and we are
all together.
See how they run like pigs from a gun, see how they fly." .....

But back to the original question: It does sound like your believe
anyone who uses candid
personal information against them is a low life, scummy piece of crap
dick head. Is that correct?

Sorry "Reggie", not buying.

Wait, I must be having problems following this thread, wasn't it you who
said:

anyone who uses candid personal information against them is a low life,
scummy piece of crap
penile cranium


Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq.

This Newsgroup post is a natural product. The slight variations in
spelling and grammar enhance its individual character and beauty and in
no way are to be considered flaws or defects

These are crazy times...
 

On Fri, 15 May 2009 18:24:07 -0400, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq."
wrote:

jps wrote:
On Fri, 15 May 2009 16:30:52 -0400, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq."
wrote:

jps wrote:
On Fri, 15 May 2009 13:22:32 -0400, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq."
wrote:

jps wrote:
On Fri, 15 May 2009 07:57:48 -0400, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq."
wrote:

jps wrote:
On Fri, 15 May 2009 00:23:01 -0400, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq."
wrote:

jps wrote:

Carry on...
On that basis, I'm a piker compared to you.

It does sound like your believe anyone who uses candid
personal information against them is a low life, scummy piece of crap
dick head. Is that correct?
I missed the start of this thread, but are you talking about Harry again?
No, DicK has been after Don about his son. It's low, poor
sportsmanship and consistent with the penile cranium which is DK.
Sorry, my bad. It does sound like your believe anyone who uses candid
personal information against them is a low life, scummy piece of crap
dick head. Is that correct?
Now I know who you are.
Yes, I am Reggie, but you didn't answer my question.
You may call yourself Reggie but you're not the same Reggie.

A little pattern recognition goes a long way.
jps,

Sorry to screw up your theory, but except for two "Reggie" posts made by
a jovial impostor about two weeks ago, you will see that I am using the
exact same IP as Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq. has been using for years.

Nope, I am me, and ..... "I am he as you are he as you are me and we are
all together.
See how they run like pigs from a gun, see how they fly." .....

But back to the original question: It does sound like your believe
anyone who uses candid
personal information against them is a low life, scummy piece of crap
dick head. Is that correct?

Sorry "Reggie", not buying.

Wait, I must be having problems following this thread, wasn't it you who
said:

anyone who uses candid personal information against them is a low life,
scummy piece of crap
penile cranium

Am I your new target for buttsniffing "Reggie?"

These are crazy times...
 

jps wrote:
t them is a low life, scummy piece of crap
dick head. Is that correct?
Sorry "Reggie", not buying.
Wait, I must be having problems following this thread, wasn't it you who
said:

anyone who uses candid personal information against them is a low life,
scummy piece of crap
penile cranium

Am I your new target for buttsniffing "Reggie?"

I guess I am missing something. I ask you a simple polite question and
you ask me if I am targeting you for buttsniffing.

For every post I make, you call 10 people assholes, dick heads etc and
as you agreed you are crude because they are dumb and need to be slap
upside the head, but that is just you doing you civic duty. Is that
correct?
--
Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq.

This Newsgroup post is a natural product. The slight variations in
spelling and grammar enhance its individual character and beauty and in
no way are to be considered flaws or defects

These are crazy times...
 

"Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq." wrote in message
...
jps wrote:
t them is a low life, scummy piece of crap
dick head. Is that correct?
Sorry "Reggie", not buying.
Wait, I must be having problems following this thread, wasn't it you who
said:

anyone who uses candid personal information against them is a low life,
scummy piece of crap
penile cranium

Am I your new target for buttsniffing "Reggie?"

I guess I am missing something. I ask you a simple polite question and
you ask me if I am targeting you for buttsniffing.

For every post I make, you call 10 people assholes, dick heads etc and as
you agreed you are crude because they are dumb and need to be slap upside
the head, but that is just you doing you civic duty. Is that correct?
--
Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq.

This Newsgroup post is a natural product. The slight variations in
spelling and grammar enhance its individual character and beauty and in no
way are to be considered flaws or defects

You do have a way with words. 8)

These are crazy times...
 

On Fri, 15 May 2009 20:43:47 -0400, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq."
wrote:

For every post I make, you call 10 people assholes, dick heads etc and
as you agreed you are crude because they are dumb and need to be slap
upside the head, but that is just you doing you civic duty. Is that
correct?

You don't post anything that isn't a buttsniff.

You're like a dog that's only mission in life is to annoy other dogs
by cramming your nose into their anus for a good whiff.

Is that your civic duty?

These are crazy times...
 

jps wrote:

You've been outed as a **** hauler. I've been outed as what?
A huge asshole.

Carry on...

On that basis, I'm a piker compared to you.

You are a scum bag who uses poster's candid personal information
against them.

Low, scummy, piece 'o crap.

I do? When and where, asshole?

These are crazy times...
 

jps wrote:
On Fri, 15 May 2009 00:23:01 -0400, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq."
wrote:

jps wrote:

Carry on...
On that basis, I'm a piker compared to you.

You are a scum bag who uses poster's candid personal information
against them.

Low, scummy, piece 'o crap.
I missed the start of this thread, but are you talking about Harry again?

No, DicK has been after Don about his son. It's low, poor
sportsmanship and consistent with the penile cranium which is DK.

Don posted that he has a lazy son. What's the big secret, skippy?

These are crazy times...
 

These are crazy times...
 

jps wrote:
On Fri, 15 May 2009 13:22:32 -0400, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq."
wrote:

jps wrote:
On Fri, 15 May 2009 07:57:48 -0400, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq."
wrote:

jps wrote:
On Fri, 15 May 2009 00:23:01 -0400, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq."
wrote:

jps wrote:

Carry on...
On that basis, I'm a piker compared to you.

You are a scum bag who uses poster's candid personal information
against them.

Low, scummy, piece 'o crap.
I missed the start of this thread, but are you talking about Harry again?
No, DicK has been after Don about his son. It's low, poor
sportsmanship and consistent with the penile cranium which is DK.
Sorry, my bad. It does sound like your believe anyone who uses candid
personal information against them is a low life, scummy piece of crap
dick head. Is that correct?
Now I know who you are.
Yes, I am Reggie, but you didn't answer my question.

You may call yourself Reggie but you're not the same Reggie.

A little pattern recognition goes a long way.

Try headers, dumbass.

These are crazy times...
 

jps wrote:
On Fri, 15 May 2009 16:30:52 -0400, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq."
wrote:

jps wrote:
On Fri, 15 May 2009 13:22:32 -0400, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq."
wrote:

jps wrote:
On Fri, 15 May 2009 07:57:48 -0400, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq."
wrote:

jps wrote:
On Fri, 15 May 2009 00:23:01 -0400, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq."
wrote:

jps wrote:

Carry on...
On that basis, I'm a piker compared to you.

You are a scum bag who uses poster's candid personal information
against them.

Low, scummy, piece 'o crap.
I missed the start of this thread, but are you talking about Harry again?
No, DicK has been after Don about his son. It's low, poor
sportsmanship and consistent with the penile cranium which is DK.
Sorry, my bad. It does sound like your believe anyone who uses candid
personal information against them is a low life, scummy piece of crap
dick head. Is that correct?
Now I know who you are.
Yes, I am Reggie, but you didn't answer my question.
You may call yourself Reggie but you're not the same Reggie.

A little pattern recognition goes a long way.
jps,

Sorry to screw up your theory, but except for two "Reggie" posts made by
a jovial impostor about two weeks ago, you will see that I am using the
exact same IP as Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq. has been using for years.

Nope, I am me, and ..... "I am he as you are he as you are me and we are
all together.
See how they run like pigs from a gun, see how they fly." .....

But back to the original question: It does sound like your believe
anyone who uses candid
personal information against them is a low life, scummy piece of crap
dick head. Is that correct?

Sorry "Reggie", not buying.

So you are incapable of reading headers?

You people...

These are crazy times...
 

On Fri, 15 May 2009 21:41:18 -0400, DK
wrote:

wrote:
On May 15, 12:43 am, jps wrote:
On Fri, 15 May 2009 00:23:01 -0400, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq."

wrote:
jps wrote:
Carry on...
On that basis, I'm a piker compared to you.
You are a scum bag who uses poster's candid personal information
against them.
Low, scummy, piece 'o crap.
I missed the start of this thread, but are you talking about Harry again?
No, DicK has been after Don about his son. It's low, poor
sportsmanship and consistent with the penile cranium which is DK.

DK has said nothing about Don's son that Don himself hasn't said.

That's true.

It's a low scumbag that uses family trouble as a way to poke fun.

That'd be you.

These are crazy times...
 

On Fri, 15 May 2009 21:42:29 -0400, DK
wrote:

jps wrote:
On Fri, 15 May 2009 13:22:32 -0400, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq."
wrote:

jps wrote:
On Fri, 15 May 2009 07:57:48 -0400, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq."
wrote:

jps wrote:
On Fri, 15 May 2009 00:23:01 -0400, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq."
wrote:

jps wrote:

Carry on...
On that basis, I'm a piker compared to you.

You are a scum bag who uses poster's candid personal information
against them.

Low, scummy, piece 'o crap.
I missed the start of this thread, but are you talking about Harry again?
No, DicK has been after Don about his son. It's low, poor
sportsmanship and consistent with the penile cranium which is DK.
Sorry, my bad. It does sound like your believe anyone who uses candid
personal information against them is a low life, scummy piece of crap
dick head. Is that correct?
Now I know who you are.
Yes, I am Reggie, but you didn't answer my question.

You may call yourself Reggie but you're not the same Reggie.

A little pattern recognition goes a long way.

Try headers, dumbass.

Headers don't confirm anything you silly dick.

These are crazy times...
 

"jps" wrote in message
...
On Fri, 15 May 2009 21:41:18 -0400, DK
wrote:

wrote:
On May 15, 12:43 am, jps wrote:
On Fri, 15 May 2009 00:23:01 -0400, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq."

wrote:
jps wrote:
Carry on...
On that basis, I'm a piker compared to you.
You are a scum bag who uses poster's candid personal information
against them.
Low, scummy, piece 'o crap.
I missed the start of this thread, but are you talking about Harry
again?
No, DicK has been after Don about his son. It's low, poor
sportsmanship and consistent with the penile cranium which is DK.

DK has said nothing about Don's son that Don himself hasn't said.

That's true.

It's a low scumbag that uses family trouble as a way to poke fun.

That'd be you.

Now there's a real Deliverance style pair...LooneyTunes and Dingy Dan.
Bet they get together for some 'shine & banjo pickin' on Looneys porch.

These are crazy times...
 

jps wrote:
On Fri, 15 May 2009 20:43:47 -0400, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq."
wrote:

For every post I make, you call 10 people assholes, dick heads etc and
as you agreed you are crude because they are dumb and need to be slap
upside the head, but that is just you doing you civic duty. Is that
correct?

You don't post anything that isn't a buttsniff.

You're like a dog that's only mission in life is to annoy other dogs
by cramming your nose into their anus for a good whiff.

Is that your civic duty?

No, I have been asking you a simple question, you seem to be the one
sniffing very strongly behind me. Would it be better if I did nothing
but hurl 5th grade expletives towards anyone I disagree with, and ignore
the obnoxious behavior of those I agree with?

--
Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq.

This Newsgroup post is a natural product. The slight variations in
spelling and grammar enhance its individual character and beauty and in
no way are to be considered flaws or defects