"HK" wrote in message
m...
Eisboch wrote:

"HK" wrote in message
m...

Tom Francis - SWSports wrote:

The American taxpayer will get nothing for the billions of dollars
showered on Chrysler from which the UAW and FIAT will benefit the
most.

Obama's administration said just yesterday that the $8 billion in
“bridge loans” the U.S. taxpayer has given to Chrysler over the past
six months, including $4 billion in bankruptcy financing, won’t be
paid back. Taxpayers also won’t be getting a big slug of Chrysler
stock in exchange.

http://money.cnn.com/2009/05/05/news...oans/index.htm

Chrysler will be divided up among Fiat, Chrysler’s unions, and
Chrysler’s debtholders. Which means that the taxpayers’ $8 billion
was a gift to these three consitituencies.

I wonder whether the Obama administration will explain its “gift” to
the saps who paid for it. I’d say that the explanation is obvious.
The White House wanted to pay off the UAW and used the shell of
Chrysler to do it.

How do you like your boy now?




If you mean Obama, just fine. I think it entirely appropriate for the
government to take steps, including blowing if necessary some billions
of dollars to try to save a significant U.S. industry.



Problem is, Chrysler was DOA. Has been for years. Chrysler knew that.
Daimler knew that.
The financial group that bought it from Dampier knew that. It should
have been allowed to go to Chapter 11 or 7 peacefully and not have cost
another $8B.


Tom's is right. The taxpayer can kiss 8 billion away for an eventuality
that would have been exactly the same for nothing. Here's another good
one .... Bank of America:

http://finance.yahoo.com/tech-ticker/article/242096/Stress-Test-Shocker-BofA-Needs-34B-But-That%27s-%22Good-News%22-for-Ken-Lewis-&-Co.?tickers=BAC,C,XLF,SKF,FAS,FAZ,^DJI
Good thing those printing presses are humming.

Eisboch



Thanks to bush, the taxpayers are throwing away TWO TRILLION DOLLARS on
Iraq. Old Tom didn't object to that waste of money.

One of the many frustrating things about discussing things with you is that
you can't seem to focus on the subject. Whenever a legitimate point is made
that you don't agree with, you counter with something totally not germane to
the subject matter. Like you just did.

Bush, Iraq and it's cost have absolutely nothing to do with giving away $8
billion to unions.

Eisboch