Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#8
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 30 Apr 2009 09:06:49 -0400, "Eisboch"
wrote: "Vic Smith" wrote in message .. . On Thu, 30 Apr 2009 08:16:24 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote: It's a tough one, and again he is demonstrating a level of understanding and wisdom that only comes with having the reigns of responsibility in one's two hands. He's beginning to realize that now *he* is the decider, not the polls, media comments, Olbermann and other armchair generals. It's not tough to anybody who thinks clearly. Basically, should the President be allowed to sanction torturing you, your wife, your daughter, your son? Can he delegate the decision to Nancy Pelosi? That's what could happen if you allow the government to torture. The "enemies of the state" don't have to be ragheads. Anybody can be pulled off the street by the gov. The government has no right to torture. I don't trust them. Subversion of the Constitution. Obama was walking a tightrope, and fell on his ass. The lame ass "ticking time bomb" strikes again. Never happened. Never. TV fantasy. I join Cheney in demanding the release of the "torture transcriptions." Cocksucking gov torturers already destroyed the videotapes. Wonder why? --Vic As smart and experienced in life as you may be or I may be, neither of us have ever experienced the level of responsibility the POTUS has. We can have our opinions and ideas about things, but it's a different story when one actually *has* the decision making responsibility. How did Truman justify in his mind that dropping A-bombs on civilian populations was justified? Same with Churchill and the massive fire bombing of Berlin? I didn't mention bombing the Japs or Krauts in WWII in the most massive conflagration in human history. I asked a simple question about giving the President life and death rights over an individual in a torture chamber. There's a tremendous difference. Could be you, your kids, your friends. Americans. Innocent. Presidents call. Or maybe delegated to Nancy Pelosi. She may see some teabaggers as a threat to "national security." I say no. You're free to answer the question as you please. --Vic |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
ICW conference scheduled........ | General | |||
A conference at sea | Tall Ship Photos | |||
AIS 2006 Conference Presentations on the Web | Electronics | |||
SCA Coaching Conference | UK Paddle | |||
Sailing conference for women, MA, early June | Cruising |