![]() |
UAW paid off for it's support
"The U.A.W. members at both automakers stand to lose some of their pay
and benefits, but the cuts are not as deep as those faced by airline and steel workers when their companies went bankrupt. Under proposed deals devised by the Treasury Department, U.A.W. pensions and retiree health care benefits would largely be protected." http://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/30/bu....html?_r=1&hpw Congratulations to the lefties - you've managed to do to this country what the Communists never could. |
UAW paid off for it's support
John H wrote:
On Thu, 30 Apr 2009 13:01:29 -0400, wrote: On Thu, 30 Apr 2009 07:31:31 -0400, "Reginald P. Smithers, IIII, Esq." wrote: "The U.A.W. members at both automakers stand to lose some of their pay and benefits, but the cuts are not as deep as those faced by airline and steel workers when their companies went bankrupt. Under proposed deals devised by the Treasury Department, U.A.W. pensions and retiree health care benefits would largely be protected." http://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/30/bu....html?_r=1&hpw Congratulations to the lefties - you've managed to do to this country what the Communists never could. I think they are scared ****less of the "UAW bubble" popping and crushing what is left of the economies of several midwest states. If the UAW doesn't make concessions those plants will get packed up and moved to a right to work state ... or offshore. It sounds like they want the tax payer to make up the difference. I thought Obama intimated that last night when he said the government would cover their pensions and medical care. -- John H For a great time, go here first... http://tinyurl.com/d3vxvm He thinks, somehow, the "government" can cover everything. |
UAW paid off for it's support
"Reginald P. Smithers, IIII, Esq." wrote in message ... "The U.A.W. members at both automakers stand to lose some of their pay and benefits, but the cuts are not as deep as those faced by airline and steel workers when their companies went bankrupt. Under proposed deals devised by the Treasury Department, U.A.W. pensions and retiree health care benefits would largely be protected." http://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/30/bu....html?_r=1&hpw Congratulations to the lefties - you've managed to do to this country what the Communists never could. Who was it that coined, "The enemy of America will come from within, that is why we leave you the right to bare arms." (Or something along those lines). This is about corruption gone mad. How can anyone justify taxing some non-union person supporting a family that makes a fraction of CAW/UAW, maybe even no pension and now has to subsidize noisy facist auto? Who bails them out when they loose thir job? Who is bailing out your pension? All this do good stuff is to cover up for the corruption really going on. Covering up for Carlysle and Ceberus world record in how bankrupt you can run a company. This is corruption gone mad. When government so brazenly bucks the popular opinion of no bailouts and now over a trillion wasted on bailouts, mostly going to bailout the filthy rich, those guns are going to come in handy as economic liberty is now a thing of the past. |
UAW paid off for it's support
"John H" wrote in message ... On Thu, 30 Apr 2009 13:01:29 -0400, wrote: On Thu, 30 Apr 2009 07:31:31 -0400, "Reginald P. Smithers, IIII, Esq." wrote: "The U.A.W. members at both automakers stand to lose some of their pay and benefits, but the cuts are not as deep as those faced by airline and steel workers when their companies went bankrupt. Under proposed deals devised by the Treasury Department, U.A.W. pensions and retiree health care benefits would largely be protected." http://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/30/bu....html?_r=1&hpw Congratulations to the lefties - you've managed to do to this country what the Communists never could. I think they are scared ****less of the "UAW bubble" popping and crushing what is left of the economies of several midwest states. If the UAW doesn't make concessions those plants will get packed up and moved to a right to work state ... or offshore. It sounds like they want the tax payer to make up the difference. I thought Obama intimated that last night when he said the government would cover their pensions and medical care. It is a liberal way, promise a lot and appologize later. People will change their minds when either they get the tax bill, or someone puts a sign on the US that says "The whole country is bankrupt, investing here is a waste of good cash!". |
UAW paid off for it's support
"John H" wrote in message ... On Thu, 30 Apr 2009 13:01:29 -0400, wrote: On Thu, 30 Apr 2009 07:31:31 -0400, "Reginald P. Smithers, IIII, Esq." wrote: "The U.A.W. members at both automakers stand to lose some of their pay and benefits, but the cuts are not as deep as those faced by airline and steel workers when their companies went bankrupt. Under proposed deals devised by the Treasury Department, U.A.W. pensions and retiree health care benefits would largely be protected." http://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/30/bu....html?_r=1&hpw Congratulations to the lefties - you've managed to do to this country what the Communists never could. I think they are scared ****less of the "UAW bubble" popping and crushing what is left of the economies of several midwest states. If the UAW doesn't make concessions those plants will get packed up and moved to a right to work state ... or offshore. It sounds like they want the tax payer to make up the difference. I thought Obama intimated that last night when he said the government would cover their pensions and medical care. It is a liberal way, promise a lot and appologize later. People will change their minds when either they get the tax bill, or someone puts a sign on the US that says "The whole country is bankrupt, investing here is a waste of good cash!". |
UAW paid off for it's support
On Apr 30, 7:38*pm, "Canuck57" wrote:
"Reginald P. Smithers, IIII, Esq." wrote in messagenews:4q2jv49r0tn0r0j09elgunh4ct7g3uhnat@4ax .com... "TheU.A.W.members at both automakers stand to lose some of their pay and benefits, but the cuts are not as deep as those faced by airline and steel workers when their companies went bankrupt. Under proposed deals devised by the Treasury Department,U.A.W.pensions and retiree health care benefits would largely be protected." http://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/30/bu....html?_r=1&hpw Congratulations to the lefties - you've managed to do to this country what the Communists never could. Who was it that coined, "The enemy of America will come from within, that is why we leave you the right to bare arms." (Or something along those lines). This is about corruption gone mad. *How can anyone justify taxing some non-union person supporting a family *that makes a fraction of CAW/UAW, maybe even no pension and now has to subsidize noisy facist auto? *Who bails them out when they loose thir job? *Who is bailing out your pension? All this do good stuff is to cover up for the corruption really going on. Covering up for Carlysle and Ceberus world record in how bankrupt you can run a company. This is corruption gone mad. *When government so brazenly bucks the popular opinion of no bailouts and now over a trillion wasted on bailouts, mostly going to bailout the filthy rich, those guns are going to come in handy as economic liberty is now a thing of the past. http://www.ibdeditorials.com/IBDArti...25726418175741 |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:24 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com