![]() |
Corrupt Elites Plan Dispossession of American Citizens
On Thu, 23 Apr 2009 10:18:22 -0700, Felix wrote:
Stop Immigration, Start Deportation Commentary by Mitchell Brooks When someone, say myself, obsessively scans the news every single day they will probably develop an overwhelming fear of the current situation within the United States. This is especially true if one reads real news; the kind that is now found almost exclusively on the Internet. The contrast between mainstream news sources and Internet news sites is astounding, especially as it pertains to the topic of immigration. I am convinced that immigration, legal and illegal, is the most deadly threat to the United States. The facts are in and the facts are powerful and disturbing. These facts will rarely be presented by the mainstream press. The third-world immigrant invasion will be portrayed, if it is portrayed at all, as a wonderful development bringing lively, diverse and joyous gifts to the drab old U.S. of A. At the very least, immigrants will be portrayed as morally superior victims. If you think overpopulation, ignorance, crime, disease, dependence on government handouts, grist for the racist affirmative-action mill, depressed wages, and cultural balkanization are wonderful new developments then you are no doubt brimming with enthusiasm for the destruction of your own country. You might also be a member of the ACLU, the Southern Poverty Law Center, the Democratic Party, the Bush wing of the Republican Party or some other organization. Or perhaps you are just a victim of politically-correct social engineering. Whatever the case, I predict many of you will be shocked when all the group hugs you have planned prove to resemble Maoist self-criticism sessions. But if you are looking for the facts and are prepared to act on them you might have to put out a little effort. Once that's done the bad news is that there is precious little good news. Every time citizens' groups manage to thwart legislation that would give amnesty to illegal aliens or increase legal immigration it is ultimately a meaningless victory. As long as our current leadership is in place they will continue to refuse to enforce the inadequate immigration laws we have and they will continue to plot with American's enemies, foreign and domestic, to increase the immigrant invasion. The only hope is for a massive defection from the two major parties that are plotting the dispossession of American citizens. A fine evaluation of a problem that will be terminal for America unless corrected. ted |
Corrupt Elites Plan Dispossession of American Citizens
Lets start with the Irish, no, maybe the Scandinavians, Germans, Slavs, no,
even better, lets throw out the people who first came over and all their descendants. There you go, anyone less than one quarter native American, GTFO. JJ |
Corrupt Elites Plan Dispossession of American Citizens
On Apr 23, 2:54*pm, wrote:
On Thu, 23 Apr 2009 10:18:22 -0700, Felix wrote: Stop Immigration, Start Deportation Commentary by Mitchell Brooks When someone, say myself, obsessively scans the news every single day they will probably develop an overwhelming fear of the current situation within the United States. This is especially true if one reads real news; the kind that is now found almost exclusively on the Internet. The contrast between mainstream news sources and Internet news sites is astounding, especially as it pertains to the topic of immigration. I am convinced that immigration, legal and illegal, is the most deadly threat to the United States. The facts are in and the facts are powerful and disturbing. These facts will rarely be presented by the mainstream press. The third-world immigrant invasion will be portrayed, if it is portrayed at all, as a wonderful development bringing lively, diverse and joyous gifts to the drab old U.S. of A. At the very least, immigrants will be portrayed as morally superior victims. If you think overpopulation, ignorance, crime, disease, dependence on government handouts, grist for the racist affirmative-action mill, depressed wages, and cultural balkanization are wonderful new developments then you are no doubt brimming with enthusiasm for the destruction of your own country. You might also be a member of the ACLU, the Southern Poverty Law Center, the Democratic Party, the Bush wing of the Republican Party or some other organization. Or perhaps you are just a victim of politically-correct social engineering. Whatever the case, I predict many of you will be shocked when all the group hugs you have planned prove to resemble Maoist self-criticism sessions. But if you are looking for the facts and are prepared to act on them you might have to put out a little effort. Once that's done the bad news is that there is precious little good news. Every time citizens' groups manage to thwart legislation that would give amnesty to illegal aliens or increase legal immigration it is ultimately a meaningless victory. As long as our current leadership is in place they will continue to refuse to enforce the inadequate immigration laws we have and they will continue to plot with American's enemies, foreign and domestic, to increase the immigrant invasion. The only hope is for a massive defection from the two major parties that are plotting the dispossession of American citizens. A fine evaluation of a problem *that will be terminal for America unless corrected. ted Dont worry, this sock-puppet has been terminated by Google....LMAO ! |
Corrupt Elites Plan Dispossession of American Citizens
On Apr 23, 2:54*pm, wrote:
On Thu, 23 Apr 2009 10:18:22 -0700, Felix wrote: Stop Immigration, Start Deportation Commentary by Mitchell Brooks When someone, say myself, obsessively scans the news every single day they will probably develop an overwhelming fear of the current situation within the United States. This is especially true if one reads real news; the kind that is now found almost exclusively on the Internet. The contrast between mainstream news sources and Internet news sites is astounding, especially as it pertains to the topic of immigration. I am convinced that immigration, legal and illegal, is the most deadly threat to the United States. The facts are in and the facts are powerful and disturbing. These facts will rarely be presented by the mainstream press. The third-world immigrant invasion will be portrayed, if it is portrayed at all, as a wonderful development bringing lively, diverse and joyous gifts to the drab old U.S. of A. At the very least, immigrants will be portrayed as morally superior victims. If you think overpopulation, ignorance, crime, disease, dependence on government handouts, grist for the racist affirmative-action mill, depressed wages, and cultural balkanization are wonderful new developments then you are no doubt brimming with enthusiasm for the destruction of your own country. You might also be a member of the ACLU, the Southern Poverty Law Center, the Democratic Party, the Bush wing of the Republican Party or some other organization. Or perhaps you are just a victim of politically-correct social engineering. Whatever the case, I predict many of you will be shocked when all the group hugs you have planned prove to resemble Maoist self-criticism sessions. But if you are looking for the facts and are prepared to act on them you might have to put out a little effort. Once that's done the bad news is that there is precious little good news. Every time citizens' groups manage to thwart legislation that would give amnesty to illegal aliens or increase legal immigration it is ultimately a meaningless victory. As long as our current leadership is in place they will continue to refuse to enforce the inadequate immigration laws we have and they will continue to plot with American's enemies, foreign and domestic, to increase the immigrant invasion. The only hope is for a massive defection from the two major parties that are plotting the dispossession of American citizens. A fine evaluation of a problem *that will be terminal for America unless corrected. ted Yup, the rich suck. They donate way more to the democratic party and the CEOs of big companies are hugely disproportionatly democrat. People assume the leaders of these troubled companies screwing the taxpayers by getting bailouts are repubs.But no, same as the people who started this crap with frannie may and freddie mac( see frank, barney) this is liberals screwing us all over. Ok. I didnt read the thread you posted. Why bother, i know my role. |
Corrupt Elites Plan Dispossession of American Citizens
Yup, the rich suck. They donate way more to the democratic party and the CEOs of big companies are hugely disproportionatly democrat. People assume the leaders of these troubled companies screwing the taxpayers by getting bailouts are repubs.But no, same as the people who started this crap with frannie may and freddie mac( see frank, barney) this is liberals screwing us all over. Ok. I didnt read the thread you posted. Why bother, i know my role. In fact, of the "Fortune 100 companies", they donate at a rate of about 14.5 to 1 to Democrats over Republicans. (Oh, look, there goes another trillion......) |
Corrupt Elites Plan Dispossession of American Citizens
On Apr 23, 2:54*pm, wrote:
I am convinced that immigration, legal and illegal, is the most deadly threat to the United States. The facts are in and the facts are cool. so what tribe are you? sioux? cherokee? |
Corrupt Elites Plan Dispossession of American Citizens
On Apr 27, 2:11*am, "Long Ranger" wrote:
In fact, of the "Fortune 100 companies", they donate at a rate of about 14.5 to 1 to Democrats over Republicans. (Oh, look, there goes another trillion......) "In fact, the grant-making was lopsided: The political left received nearly $59 million, while the political right received only about $4 million, a ratio of 14.5 to 1. The Wildlife Conservation Society, which took in a huge $35-million grant from the Goldman Sachs Foundation, was the top beneficiary on the political left of Fortune 100 foundation giving. It was followed by the Conservation International Foundation ($4.5 million), the National Council of La Raza ($2.9 million) and the Nature Conservancy ($1.9 million). The American Enterprise Institute received $575,000, which was the largest single Fortune 100 grant to a group on the right, followed by the Competitive Enterprise Institute ($325,000) and the Employment Policies Institute ($275,000)." http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=16588 good call there; wildlife conservation society = democrats. conservation international foundation =democrats national council of la raza = democrats nature conservancy = democrats. you don't see those nature groups as being fundamentally different from the AEI, or the CEI, other than in democrats vs republicans? |
Corrupt Elites Plan Dispossession of American Citizens
z wrote:
On Apr 23, 2:54 pm, wrote: I am convinced that immigration, legal and illegal, is the most deadly threat to the United States. The facts are in and the facts are cool. so what tribe are you? sioux? cherokee? There are not indigenous human populations of North America. Even the "indians" ancestors immigrated here across the land bridge from Siberia. |
Corrupt Elites Plan Dispossession of American Citizens
"JDH" wrote in message ... z wrote: On Apr 23, 2:54 pm, wrote: I am convinced that immigration, legal and illegal, is the most deadly threat to the United States. The facts are in and the facts are cool. so what tribe are you? sioux? cherokee? There are not indigenous human populations of North America. Even the "indians" ancestors immigrated here across the land bridge from Siberia. Plus, we kicked their asses and conquered them, fair and square. Much like the Mexicans are doing to us now, only with different methodology. |
Corrupt Elites Plan Dispossession of American Citizens
"JDH" wrote in message ... z wrote: On Apr 23, 2:54 pm, wrote: I am convinced that immigration, legal and illegal, is the most deadly threat to the United States. The facts are in and the facts are cool. so what tribe are you? sioux? cherokee? There are not indigenous human populations of North America. Even the "indians" ancestors immigrated here across the land bridge from Siberia. There is also a US Supreme Court Decision from the 1800s that declares that anyone born on the continent is a "Native American" |
Corrupt Elites Plan Dispossession of American Citizens
"SaPeIsMa" wrote in message ernet... "JDH" wrote in message ... z wrote: On Apr 23, 2:54 pm, wrote: I am convinced that immigration, legal and illegal, is the most deadly threat to the United States. The facts are in and the facts are cool. so what tribe are you? sioux? cherokee? There are not indigenous human populations of North America. Even the "indians" ancestors immigrated here across the land bridge from Siberia. There is also a US Supreme Court Decision from the 1800s that declares that anyone born on the continent is a "Native American" Now that's good news! I'm going to head over to the San Manuel Casino today and demand my cut. :) --Wayne |
Corrupt Elites Plan Dispossession of American Citizens
On Mon, 27 Apr 2009 06:41:33 -0700, "Long Ranger"
wrote: There are not indigenous human populations of North America. Even the "indians" ancestors immigrated here across the land bridge from Siberia. Plus, we kicked their asses and conquered them, fair and square. Much like the Mexicans are doing to us now, only with different methodology. The Mexicans are conquering us more closely to the same way as the Polish, Irish, and Italians conquered us a century ago. Except then the hatred against the immigrants was greater, with a strong anti Roman-Catholic element. The result will be the same anyhow. -- "In no part of the constitution is more wisdom to be found, than in the clause which confides the question of war or peace to the legislature, and not to the executive department." - James Madison |
Corrupt Elites Plan Dispossession of American Citizens
"Howard Brazee" wrote in message ... On Mon, 27 Apr 2009 06:41:33 -0700, "Long Ranger" wrote: There are not indigenous human populations of North America. Even the "indians" ancestors immigrated here across the land bridge from Siberia. Plus, we kicked their asses and conquered them, fair and square. Much like the Mexicans are doing to us now, only with different methodology. The Mexicans are conquering us more closely to the same way as the Polish, Irish, and Italians conquered us a century ago. Except then the hatred against the immigrants was greater, with a strong anti Roman-Catholic element. The result will be the same anyhow. Not likely. There is a distinct cultural difference, and the numbers are waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaay higher. I'm sure there will be a knee-jerk reaction by everyone, but you only need to stop in on East L.A. to have the facts thrown in your face. Lots of people hide their spinelessness behind this sort of equivocating. |
Corrupt Elites Plan Dispossession of American Citizens
On Mon, 27 Apr 2009 16:11:43 -0700, "Long Ranger"
wrote: The result will be the same anyhow. Not likely. There is a distinct cultural difference, and the numbers are waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaay higher. I'm sure there will be a knee-jerk reaction by everyone, but you only need to stop in on East L.A. to have the facts thrown in your face. Lots of people hide their spinelessness behind this sort of equivocating. Read about the cities a century ago. -- "In no part of the constitution is more wisdom to be found, than in the clause which confides the question of war or peace to the legislature, and not to the executive department." - James Madison |
Corrupt Elites Plan Dispossession of American Citizens
On 2009-04-27 09:41:33 -0400, "Long Ranger" said:
"JDH" wrote in message ... z wrote: On Apr 23, 2:54 pm, wrote: I am convinced that immigration, legal and illegal, is the most deadly threat to the United States. The facts are in and the facts are cool. so what tribe are you? sioux? cherokee? There are not indigenous human populations of North America. Even the "indians" ancestors immigrated here across the land bridge from Siberia. Plus, we kicked their asses and conquered them, fair and square. Much like the Mexicans are doing to us now, only with different methodology. "Fair and Square"? What comic books have you been reading? -- "When fascism comes to America, it will be wrapped in the flag and carrying the cross." - Sinclair Lewis |
Corrupt Elites Plan Dispossession of American Citizens
On 2009-04-27 11:41:54 -0400, "SaPeIsMa" said:
"JDH" wrote in message ... z wrote: On Apr 23, 2:54 pm, wrote: I am convinced that immigration, legal and illegal, is the most deadly threat to the United States. The facts are in and the facts are cool. so what tribe are you? sioux? cherokee? There are not indigenous human populations of North America. Even the "indians" ancestors immigrated here across the land bridge from Siberia. There is also a US Supreme Court Decision from the 1800s that declares that anyone born on the continent is a "Native American" That same Supreme Court upheld slavery. -- "When fascism comes to America, it will be wrapped in the flag and carrying the cross." - Sinclair Lewis |
Corrupt Elites Plan Dispossession of American Citizens
On 2009-04-27 19:11:43 -0400, "Long Ranger" said:
"Howard Brazee" wrote in message ... On Mon, 27 Apr 2009 06:41:33 -0700, "Long Ranger" wrote: There are not indigenous human populations of North America. Even the "indians" ancestors immigrated here across the land bridge from Siberia. Plus, we kicked their asses and conquered them, fair and square. Much like the Mexicans are doing to us now, only with different methodology. The Mexicans are conquering us more closely to the same way as the Polish, Irish, and Italians conquered us a century ago. Except then the hatred against the immigrants was greater, with a strong anti Roman-Catholic element. The result will be the same anyhow. Not likely. There is a distinct cultural difference, and the numbers are waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaay higher. I'm sure there will be a knee-jerk reaction by everyone, but you only need to stop in on East L.A. to have the facts thrown in your face. Lots of people hide their spinelessness behind this sort of equivocating. You yahoo types are soooo funny. Look in the kitchen of any restaurant, look who is cutting your grass, look who is cleaning your homes and raising your children! You want all the benefits of cheap Mexican labor, but you dont want the Mexicans. Hypocrites! -- "When fascism comes to America, it will be wrapped in the flag and carrying the cross." - Sinclair Lewis |
Corrupt Elites Plan Dispossession of American Citizens
"Slim" wrote in message news:2009042721004316807-slim@pickinscom... On 2009-04-27 09:41:33 -0400, "Long Ranger" said: "JDH" wrote in message ... z wrote: On Apr 23, 2:54 pm, wrote: I am convinced that immigration, legal and illegal, is the most deadly threat to the United States. The facts are in and the facts are cool. so what tribe are you? sioux? cherokee? There are not indigenous human populations of North America. Even the "indians" ancestors immigrated here across the land bridge from Siberia. Plus, we kicked their asses and conquered them, fair and square. Much like the Mexicans are doing to us now, only with different methodology. "Fair and Square"? What comic books have you been reading? What, were we supposed to just go carve some bows and arrows out of the nearest tree and bring our selves down to their level? |
Corrupt Elites Plan Dispossession of American Citizens
"Slim" wrote in message news:2009042721013975249-slim@pickinscom... On 2009-04-27 11:41:54 -0400, "SaPeIsMa" said: "JDH" wrote in message ... z wrote: On Apr 23, 2:54 pm, wrote: I am convinced that immigration, legal and illegal, is the most deadly threat to the United States. The facts are in and the facts are cool. so what tribe are you? sioux? cherokee? There are not indigenous human populations of North America. Even the "indians" ancestors immigrated here across the land bridge from Siberia. There is also a US Supreme Court Decision from the 1800s that declares that anyone born on the continent is a "Native American" That same Supreme Court upheld slavery. So, it follows then, that we should abandon all the decisions of the Supreme Court? But wait, that would kill the Democratic Party instantly! |
Corrupt Elites Plan Dispossession of American Citizens
On Apr 27, 7:11*pm, "Long Ranger" wrote:
"Howard Brazee" wrote in message ... On Mon, 27 Apr 2009 06:41:33 -0700, "Long Ranger" wrote: There are not indigenous human populations of North America. Even the "indians" ancestors immigrated here across the land bridge from Siberia. Plus, we kicked their asses and conquered them, fair and square. Much like the Mexicans are doing to us now, only with different methodology. The Mexicans are conquering us more closely to the same way as the Polish, Irish, and Italians conquered us a century ago. * Except then the hatred against the immigrants was greater, with a strong anti Roman-Catholic element. The result will be the same anyhow. Not likely. There is a distinct cultural difference, and the numbers are waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaay higher. I'm sure there will be a knee-jerk reaction by everyone, but you only need to stop in on East L.A. to have the facts thrown in your face. Lots of people hide their spinelessness behind this sort of equivocating.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - oh noes! they'll probably change the name of los angeles to something mexican! |
Corrupt Elites Plan Dispossession of American Citizens
On Apr 27, 9:03*pm, Slim wrote:
You want all the benefits of cheap Mexican labor, but you dont want the Mexicans. and they kidnap a bunch of africans and bring them over here to be slaves, and then complain about the low quality of the folks they enslaved. |
Corrupt Elites Plan Dispossession of American Citizens
On Apr 27, 11:41*am, "SaPeIsMa" wrote:
"JDH" wrote in message ... z wrote: On Apr 23, 2:54 pm, wrote: I am convinced that immigration, legal and illegal, is the most deadly threat to the United States. The facts are in and the facts are cool. so what tribe are you? sioux? cherokee? There are not indigenous human populations of North America. Even the "indians" ancestors immigrated here across the land bridge from Siberia.. There is also a US Supreme Court Decision from the 1800s that declares that anyone born on the continent is a "Native American" except obama. |
Corrupt Elites Plan Dispossession of American Citizens
Slim wrote:
On 2009-04-27 19:11:43 -0400, "Long Ranger" said: "Howard Brazee" wrote in message ... On Mon, 27 Apr 2009 06:41:33 -0700, "Long Ranger" wrote: There are not indigenous human populations of North America. Even the "indians" ancestors immigrated here across the land bridge from Siberia. Plus, we kicked their asses and conquered them, fair and square. Much like the Mexicans are doing to us now, only with different methodology. The Mexicans are conquering us more closely to the same way as the Polish, Irish, and Italians conquered us a century ago. Except then the hatred against the immigrants was greater, with a strong anti Roman-Catholic element. The result will be the same anyhow. Not likely. There is a distinct cultural difference, and the numbers are waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaay higher. I'm sure there will be a knee-jerk reaction by everyone, but you only need to stop in on East L.A. to have the facts thrown in your face. Lots of people hide their spinelessness behind this sort of equivocating. You yahoo types are soooo funny. Look in the kitchen of any restaurant, look who is cutting your grass, look who is cleaning your homes and raising your children! You want all the benefits of cheap Mexican labor, but you dont want the Mexicans. Hypocrites! Although many people think that employing an illegal is better than having a slave, you don't feed them, clothe them or have to be bothered by injury, sickness and death. Although those are all good arguments, I disagree, In the long run it harms the economy, keeps American citizens out of work, and puts an increasing strain upon our health care and school systems. -- “Someone said to me, what doesn't kill me makes me stronger, and my response was, that just means, I need to put more bullet holes in you!” -- Rev. Shawn Cole |
Corrupt Elites Plan Dispossession of American Citizens
In article t,
"SaPeIsMa" wrote: There is also a US Supreme Court Decision from the 1800s that declares that anyone born on the continent is a "Native American" So that means Mexicans, Canadians, Guatemalans, Salvadorans, etc. are all Native Americans? |
Corrupt Elites Plan Dispossession of American Citizens
z wrote:
On Apr 27, 9:03 pm, Slim wrote: You want all the benefits of cheap Mexican labor, but you dont want the Mexicans. and they kidnap a bunch of africans and bring them over here to be slaves, and then complain about the low quality of the folks they enslaved. Well, they were the ones who got caught. I suppose those who got away and weren't captured were smarter? TDD |
Corrupt Elites Plan Dispossession of American Citizens
Long Ranger wrote:
"Slim" wrote in message news:2009042721013975249-slim@pickinscom... On 2009-04-27 11:41:54 -0400, "SaPeIsMa" said: "JDH" wrote in message ... z wrote: On Apr 23, 2:54 pm, wrote: I am convinced that immigration, legal and illegal, is the most deadly threat to the United States. The facts are in and the facts are cool. so what tribe are you? sioux? cherokee? There are not indigenous human populations of North America. Even the "indians" ancestors immigrated here across the land bridge from Siberia. There is also a US Supreme Court Decision from the 1800s that declares that anyone born on the continent is a "Native American" That same Supreme Court upheld slavery. So, it follows then, that we should abandon all the decisions of the Supreme Court? But wait, that would kill the Democratic Party instantly! Do you mean The Democrat Party? There is nothing democratic about The Democrat Party. TDD |
Corrupt Elites Plan Dispossession of American Citizens
"The Daring Dufas" wrote in message ... Long Ranger wrote: "Slim" wrote in message news:2009042721013975249-slim@pickinscom... On 2009-04-27 11:41:54 -0400, "SaPeIsMa" said: "JDH" wrote in message ... z wrote: On Apr 23, 2:54 pm, wrote: I am convinced that immigration, legal and illegal, is the most deadly threat to the United States. The facts are in and the facts are cool. so what tribe are you? sioux? cherokee? There are not indigenous human populations of North America. Even the "indians" ancestors immigrated here across the land bridge from Siberia. There is also a US Supreme Court Decision from the 1800s that declares that anyone born on the continent is a "Native American" That same Supreme Court upheld slavery. So, it follows then, that we should abandon all the decisions of the Supreme Court? But wait, that would kill the Democratic Party instantly! Do you mean The Democrat Party? There is nothing democratic about The Democrat Party. TDD Quite right, thanks. |
Corrupt Elites Plan Dispossession of American Citizens
The Daring Dufas wrote:
z wrote: On Apr 27, 9:03 pm, Slim wrote: You want all the benefits of cheap Mexican labor, but you dont want the Mexicans. and they kidnap a bunch of africans and bring them over here to be slaves, and then complain about the low quality of the folks they enslaved. Well, they were the ones who got caught. I suppose those who got away and weren't captured were smarter? One interesting question is why Africans weren't raiding the coast of Portugal and carrying off slaves of their own? See, there's Africa and there's Africa. One part of Africa built the pyramids and the Library of Alexandria. Another part of Africa couldn't even invent the wheel. Or copy it. Or navigation. Or a written language. You'd think, that since humans began in the Great Rift Valley, southern Africans would have a head start with evolution... |
Corrupt Elites Plan Dispossession of American Citizens
On 2009-04-27 22:08:34 -0400, "Long Ranger" said:
"Slim" wrote in message news:2009042721004316807-slim@pickinscom... On 2009-04-27 09:41:33 -0400, "Long Ranger" said: "JDH" wrote in message ... z wrote: On Apr 23, 2:54 pm, wrote: I am convinced that immigration, legal and illegal, is the most deadly threat to the United States. The facts are in and the facts are cool. so what tribe are you? sioux? cherokee? There are not indigenous human populations of North America. Even the "indians" ancestors immigrated here across the land bridge from Siberia. Plus, we kicked their asses and conquered them, fair and square. Much like the Mexicans are doing to us now, only with different methodology. "Fair and Square"? What comic books have you been reading? What, were we supposed to just go carve some bows and arrows out of the nearest tree and bring our selves down to their level? We stole the land with a Bible in one hand and a gun in the other. Not to mention the outright lies and fraud that was perpetrated on the native Americans. "FAIR AND SQUARE?" Only in comic books. http://nativeamericanfirstnationshis...hain_of_abuses Long Chain of Abuses Broken Treaties © Jeffrey R Gudzune Mar 31, 2007 Since 1787, over 750 land cessions have been authorized by supposed mutual compacts. History demostrates there was little that was mutual about these "treaties." The long series of land usurpations that would gradually erode Native American territory began with the slash of a quill pen upon parchment; a seemingly innocuous sound, but one masking a hidden motive. Though the United States would employ the resources of its vast military in an effort to enforce its policy of containing the numerous tribes, each land cession was made "legal" by a simple piece of paper--a treaty. This was the weapon employed by a growing nation as it sought the most expedient means of securing its swelling boarders. The American government offered recompense, resettlement, and even trade to the states with which it was dealing in exchange for the lands it intended to occupy. To many Native Americans, however, selling the land was an alien concept. The land was elemental; it was as essential to life as air and could not be owned by anyone. To agree to "give up" all or even a percentage of the land seemed as absurd as selling the air. It was, however, through the treaty that the plight of the Native American began. In theory, a treaty is a mutual compact between two nations. In practice, there was nothing mutual about the treaties authorizing land cessions--and all too often the recompensatory provisions of such treaties were mitigated before the ink could dry. The treaty system dates to the colonial period. Native American nations signed compacts with the English, French, and Dutch settlers and eventually with the permanent colonies in the years before the American Revolution. After the French and Indian War, the English government sought to control colonial expansion into territories west of the Appalachian watershed. The Royal Proclamation of 1763 was meant to define the boarders of colonial America, but it only alienated the colonists. When the colonies declared independence, they adopted a departmental system to deal with their Indian neighbors--three superintendencies that answered to Congress. To the United States, Native American nations were only de facto states. In the implementation of its diplomatic policy toward the Native American population, the United States assumed the role of an empire over a protectorate. This opened the door for segregation and near decimation of the Native American population. With its first treaty with an Indian state in 1778 (with the Lenni Lenape, or Delaware Indians) through the Treaty of Echota of 1835 (with the Cherokee in Georgia) the only policy has been removal. This is not to say that the treaties were one sided. In fact, the American government did provide recompensatory provisions in exchange for title to Indian lands. Often a relocation allowance and future payments were given, as in the case of the controversial Treaty of Echota. However, subsequent acts of Congress and shifting political winds demuted many such provisions. Why then were these treaties signed? Examining the major land cessions from 1784 to 1894, it is clear that nearly all of these treaties were forced on Native American nations. Most were negotiated after wars; as in the case of the Treaty of Greenville (1795), the Treaty of Fort Jackson (1814), and the Treaty of Fort Armstrong (1832). These wars were started by white settlers encroaching on Indian lands. Other treaties were brought about by the demands of the individual states, as with the Treaty of Echota. This treaty removed the Cherokee from thier territory and resettled them in a designated Indian Territoy in Oklahoma. They were forced out in a march that killed over 4000 Cherokee. Following the Civil War, those nations that had allied with the Confederacy (such as the Cherokee and Creek) were forced to give up more territory. By 1890, nearly every Native American nation was reduced to a reservation. Those that were not relegated to this state were all but extinct. The consolodation of land was complete. Reservation life did have its degree of success. Many prospered. It was a hard road, but they managed to endure. Many more nations suffered for want of funds, suitable agricultural opportunities, and good leadership. Constant legal battles to retain what little lands that remained occupied the Cherokee, Comanche, and Creek nations. The forces of change were gathering strength, however. The last gasp of those seeking to destroy the Indian way of life was the Dawes General Allotment Act of 1887--which proposed to break up reservations into 160 acre plots. The motivation behind this legislation was the end of the concept of Native American states as nations and thier assimilation into American culture. Those tribes that accepted this provision faced thier own legal issues when the Curtis Act of 1898 attemtped to dissolve thier governments. Native sovereignty would have dissapeared were it not for the efforts of John Collier, who, as Commissioner of Indian Affiars, brought pressure on Congress to pass legislation that enumerated the rights of Native Americans. The result was the Indian Reorganization Act of 1934, the provisions of which restored native lands, provided better medical services to reservations, and encouraged the development of business opportunities. This sins of the past were not wiped clean, but finally the Native American nation was secured under the laws of the United States. With a renewed status, many nations went about the task of rebuilding a proud heritage that is so much a part of this nation...this nation of many nations. Read mo http://nativeamericanfirstnationshis...xzz0DzNXKq6q&B -- "When fascism comes to America, it will be wrapped in the flag and carrying the cross." - Sinclair Lewis |
Corrupt Elites Plan Dispossession of American Citizens
(SNIP)
There are not indigenous human populations of North America. Even the "indians" ancestors immigrated here across the land bridge from Siberia. Plus, we kicked their asses and conquered them, fair and square. Much like the Mexicans are doing to us now, only with different methodology. "Fair and Square"? What comic books have you been reading? What, were we supposed to just go carve some bows and arrows out of the nearest tree and bring our selves down to their level? We stole the land with a Bible in one hand and a gun in the other. Not to mention the outright lies and fraud that was perpetrated on the native Americans. "FAIR AND SQUARE?" Only in comic books. http://nativeamericanfirstnationshis...hain_of_abuses Long Chain of Abuses Broken Treaties © Jeffrey R Gudzune ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---- Mar 31, 2007 Since 1787, over 750 land cessions have been authorized by supposed mutual compacts. History demostrates there was little that was mutual about these "treaties." The long series of land usurpations that would gradually erode Native American territory began with the slash of a quill pen upon parchment; a seemingly innocuous sound, but one masking a hidden motive. Though the United States would employ the resources of its vast military in an effort to enforce its policy of containing the numerous tribes, each land cession was made "legal" by a simple piece of paper--a treaty. This was the weapon employed by a growing nation as it sought the most expedient means of securing its swelling boarders. The American government offered recompense, resettlement, and even trade to the states with which it was dealing in exchange for the lands it intended to occupy. To many Native Americans, however, selling the land was an alien concept. The land was elemental; it was as essential to life as air and could not be owned by anyone. To agree to "give up" all or even a percentage of the land seemed as absurd as selling the air. It was, however, through the treaty that the plight of the Native American began. In theory, a treaty is a mutual compact between two nations. In practice, there was nothing mutual about the treaties authorizing land cessions--and all too often the recompensatory provisions of such treaties were mitigated before the ink could dry. The treaty system dates to the colonial period. Native American nations signed compacts with the English, French, and Dutch settlers and eventually with the permanent colonies in the years before the American Revolution. After the French and Indian War, the English government sought to control colonial expansion into territories west of the Appalachian watershed. The Royal Proclamation of 1763 was meant to define the boarders of colonial America, but it only alienated the colonists. When the colonies declared independence, they adopted a departmental system to deal with their Indian neighbors--three superintendencies that answered to Congress. To the United States, Native American nations were only de facto states. In the implementation of its diplomatic policy toward the Native American population, the United States assumed the role of an empire over a protectorate. This opened the door for segregation and near decimation of the Native American population. With its first treaty with an Indian state in 1778 (with the Lenni Lenape, or Delaware Indians) through the Treaty of Echota of 1835 (with the Cherokee in Georgia) the only policy has been removal. This is not to say that the treaties were one sided. In fact, the American government did provide recompensatory provisions in exchange for title to Indian lands. Often a relocation allowance and future payments were given, as in the case of the controversial Treaty of Echota. However, subsequent acts of Congress and shifting political winds demuted many such provisions. Why then were these treaties signed? Examining the major land cessions from 1784 to 1894, it is clear that nearly all of these treaties were forced on Native American nations. Most were negotiated after wars; as in the case of the Treaty of Greenville (1795), the Treaty of Fort Jackson (1814), and the Treaty of Fort Armstrong (1832). These wars were started by white settlers encroaching on Indian lands. Other treaties were brought about by the demands of the individual states, as with the Treaty of Echota. This treaty removed the Cherokee from thier territory and resettled them in a designated Indian Territoy in Oklahoma. They were forced out in a march that killed over 4000 Cherokee. Following the Civil War, those nations that had allied with the Confederacy (such as the Cherokee and Creek) were forced to give up more territory. By 1890, nearly every Native American nation was reduced to a reservation. Those that were not relegated to this state were all but extinct. The consolodation of land was complete. Reservation life did have its degree of success. Many prospered. It was a hard road, but they managed to endure. Many more nations suffered for want of funds, suitable agricultural opportunities, and good leadership. Constant legal battles to retain what little lands that remained occupied the Cherokee, Comanche, and Creek nations. The forces of change were gathering strength, however. The last gasp of those seeking to destroy the Indian way of life was the Dawes General Allotment Act of 1887--which proposed to break up reservations into 160 acre plots. The motivation behind this legislation was the end of the concept of Native American states as nations and thier assimilation into American culture. Those tribes that accepted this provision faced thier own legal issues when the Curtis Act of 1898 attemtped to dissolve thier governments. Native sovereignty would have dissapeared were it not for the efforts of John Collier, who, as Commissioner of Indian Affiars, brought pressure on Congress to pass legislation that enumerated the rights of Native Americans. The result was the Indian Reorganization Act of 1934, the provisions of which restored native lands, provided better medical services to reservations, and encouraged the development of business opportunities. This sins of the past were not wiped clean, but finally the Native American nation was secured under the laws of the United States. With a renewed status, many nations went about the task of rebuilding a proud heritage that is so much a part of this nation...this nation of many nations. Read mo http://nativeamericanfirstnationshis...xzz0DzNXKq6q&B Only a country rube is unfamiliar with this story. Basically, what it says is that we didn't have the courage of our own convictions and we had to do what we did in a back-handed way. Plus, we quit before we were done and ended up setting the stage for sovereign nations within our nation, and for some reason I can't fathom, an indian gambling concession that stretches nearly coast to coast. |
Corrupt Elites Plan Dispossession of American Citizens
HeyBub wrote:
The Daring Dufas wrote: z wrote: On Apr 27, 9:03 pm, Slim wrote: You want all the benefits of cheap Mexican labor, but you dont want the Mexicans. and they kidnap a bunch of africans and bring them over here to be slaves, and then complain about the low quality of the folks they enslaved. Well, they were the ones who got caught. I suppose those who got away and weren't captured were smarter? One interesting question is why Africans weren't raiding the coast of Portugal and carrying off slaves of their own? See, there's Africa and there's Africa. One part of Africa built the pyramids and the Library of Alexandria. Another part of Africa couldn't even invent the wheel. Or copy it. Or navigation. Or a written language. You'd think, that since humans began in the Great Rift Valley, southern Africans would have a head start with evolution... You are aware that Adam and Eve were Negro? Who else would partake of a prohibited item and get kicked out of free government housing. TDD |
Corrupt Elites Plan Dispossession of American Citizens
"The Daring Dufas" wrote in message ... HeyBub wrote: The Daring Dufas wrote: z wrote: On Apr 27, 9:03 pm, Slim wrote: You want all the benefits of cheap Mexican labor, but you dont want the Mexicans. and they kidnap a bunch of africans and bring them over here to be slaves, and then complain about the low quality of the folks they enslaved. Well, they were the ones who got caught. I suppose those who got away and weren't captured were smarter? One interesting question is why Africans weren't raiding the coast of Portugal and carrying off slaves of their own? See, there's Africa and there's Africa. One part of Africa built the pyramids and the Library of Alexandria. Another part of Africa couldn't even invent the wheel. Or copy it. Or navigation. Or a written language. You'd think, that since humans began in the Great Rift Valley, southern Africans would have a head start with evolution... You are aware that Adam and Eve were Negro? Who else would partake of a prohibited item and get kicked out of free government housing. TDD That you..JohnnyH? |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:06 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com