|
Hey, guess what's new?!
Bzzzzztttttt. We do believe in the Bible, specifically the King James version. We do however see the Book of Mormon as an additional text to the bible, as with the Doctrine and Covenants and the Pearl of Great Price.. But like you, and I can see that you are open minded, I don't care to discuss it with the bigotshere... One of the articles of faith in Mormonism is: "We believe in the bible as far as it is correctly translated." That allows throwing out anything that contradicts Mormondom. The "historical" underpinnings of the Book of Mormon transcend the bizarre. Which book of Mormon are you referring to? There has been scores of versions, revised from the previous to make up for some error. If it is prophesy, there are no errors. Bibles have different "versions", but they don't rewrite things they disagree with. |
Hey, guess what's new?!
On Apr 22, 9:14*pm, "SteveB" wrote:
Bzzzzztttttt. We do believe in the Bible, specifically the King James version. We do however see the Book of Mormon as an additional text to the bible, as with the Doctrine and Covenants and the Pearl of Great Price.. But like you, and I can see that you are open minded, I don't care to discuss it with the bigotshere... One of the articles of faith in Mormonism is: *"We believe in the bible as far as it is correctly translated." *That allows throwing out anything that contradicts Mormondom. The "historical" underpinnings of the Book of Mormon transcend the bizarre. Which book of Mormon are you referring to? *There has been scores of versions, revised from the previous to make up for some error. *If it is prophesy, there are no errors. *Bibles have different "versions", but they don't rewrite things they disagree with. The "historical" underpinnings of the Book of Mormon transcend the bizarre. Just like their false Prophet, Joseph Smith. |
Hey, guess what's new?!
|
Hey, guess what's new?!
On Wed, 22 Apr 2009 19:10:07 -0600, "SteveB"
wrote: "jps" wrote in message .. . On Wed, 22 Apr 2009 09:29:44 -0600, "SteveB" wrote: "jps" wrote in message ... On Tue, 21 Apr 2009 23:30:02 -0700, "Calif Bill" wrote: "jps" wrote in message om... On Tue, 21 Apr 2009 15:39:02 -0700, "Calif Bill" wrote: "SteveB" wrote in message ... There's lots of paranoid lunatics with guns. Not hoodlums, ****ing lunatics. We're the only country on the planet, save from some real backwards tribals outposts, that host such a profusion of firepower. We're also the western civilization that sports the higest per capita rate of gun death in the world. Ah, yes. If we could only improve the technologies of underdeveloped nations and get them to quit using those machetes................... Those underdeveloped nations also get in to massive Genocide via firearms. Maybe if the genocided had more firearms the genocidee's might be less inclined to engage in genocide. Hell the genocidee's also seem to use hacking instuments with vigor. I don't think it's a good thing to compete with underdeveloped nations for the most savagery and violence. You seem to think that is all we do here in America. Seems to be showing up a lot in the paper, every day. Economic stress is not helping. Well, Pollyanna, what would YOU do? I mean, besides taking everyone's guns and other liberties and having ID numbers stenciled on the inside of the forearm. Steve ****in' well arm everybody Steve. Elementary schoolers need protection from bullies on the playground. If a kid wants your lunch money, blast 'em! Putting guns in everyone's hands is a recipe for disaster. If you don't recognize that you're ****ing stupid. Now you have me confused. In the first sentence of the first paragraph, you say arm everyone. Then in the second paragraph, you contradict yourself. You are wearing me down. Are you on drugs? That's because you're too ****ing dense to recognize sarcasm. |
Hey, guess what's new?!
"jps" wrote in message ... On Wed, 22 Apr 2009 19:10:07 -0600, "SteveB" wrote: "jps" wrote in message . .. On Wed, 22 Apr 2009 09:29:44 -0600, "SteveB" wrote: "jps" wrote in message m... On Tue, 21 Apr 2009 23:30:02 -0700, "Calif Bill" wrote: "jps" wrote in message news:vmjsu41trhgqr2hfqqiq08aq66j58kqep6@4ax. com... On Tue, 21 Apr 2009 15:39:02 -0700, "Calif Bill" wrote: "SteveB" wrote in message ... There's lots of paranoid lunatics with guns. Not hoodlums, ****ing lunatics. We're the only country on the planet, save from some real backwards tribals outposts, that host such a profusion of firepower. We're also the western civilization that sports the higest per capita rate of gun death in the world. Ah, yes. If we could only improve the technologies of underdeveloped nations and get them to quit using those machetes................... Those underdeveloped nations also get in to massive Genocide via firearms. Maybe if the genocided had more firearms the genocidee's might be less inclined to engage in genocide. Hell the genocidee's also seem to use hacking instuments with vigor. I don't think it's a good thing to compete with underdeveloped nations for the most savagery and violence. You seem to think that is all we do here in America. Seems to be showing up a lot in the paper, every day. Economic stress is not helping. Well, Pollyanna, what would YOU do? I mean, besides taking everyone's guns and other liberties and having ID numbers stenciled on the inside of the forearm. Steve ****in' well arm everybody Steve. Elementary schoolers need protection from bullies on the playground. If a kid wants your lunch money, blast 'em! Putting guns in everyone's hands is a recipe for disaster. If you don't recognize that you're ****ing stupid. Now you have me confused. In the first sentence of the first paragraph, you say arm everyone. Then in the second paragraph, you contradict yourself. You are wearing me down. Are you on drugs? That's because you're too ****ing dense to recognize sarcasm. Oh, that's what it was. Oh, dopey me. It's just that your writing style is all over the map, and I'm never sure what it is that you are saying exactly. Other than the ****ing and moaning, that is. Are you in ALANON? |
Hey, guess what's new?!
On Wed, 22 Apr 2009 23:49:06 -0600, "SteveB"
wrote: "jps" wrote in message .. . On Wed, 22 Apr 2009 19:10:07 -0600, "SteveB" wrote: "jps" wrote in message ... On Wed, 22 Apr 2009 09:29:44 -0600, "SteveB" wrote: "jps" wrote in message om... On Tue, 21 Apr 2009 23:30:02 -0700, "Calif Bill" wrote: "jps" wrote in message news:vmjsu41trhgqr2hfqqiq08aq66j58kqep6@4ax .com... On Tue, 21 Apr 2009 15:39:02 -0700, "Calif Bill" wrote: "SteveB" wrote in message ... There's lots of paranoid lunatics with guns. Not hoodlums, ****ing lunatics. We're the only country on the planet, save from some real backwards tribals outposts, that host such a profusion of firepower. We're also the western civilization that sports the higest per capita rate of gun death in the world. Ah, yes. If we could only improve the technologies of underdeveloped nations and get them to quit using those machetes................... Those underdeveloped nations also get in to massive Genocide via firearms. Maybe if the genocided had more firearms the genocidee's might be less inclined to engage in genocide. Hell the genocidee's also seem to use hacking instuments with vigor. I don't think it's a good thing to compete with underdeveloped nations for the most savagery and violence. You seem to think that is all we do here in America. Seems to be showing up a lot in the paper, every day. Economic stress is not helping. Well, Pollyanna, what would YOU do? I mean, besides taking everyone's guns and other liberties and having ID numbers stenciled on the inside of the forearm. Steve ****in' well arm everybody Steve. Elementary schoolers need protection from bullies on the playground. If a kid wants your lunch money, blast 'em! Putting guns in everyone's hands is a recipe for disaster. If you don't recognize that you're ****ing stupid. Now you have me confused. In the first sentence of the first paragraph, you say arm everyone. Then in the second paragraph, you contradict yourself. You are wearing me down. Are you on drugs? That's because you're too ****ing dense to recognize sarcasm. Oh, that's what it was. Oh, dopey me. It's just that your writing style is all over the map, and I'm never sure what it is that you are saying exactly. Other than the ****ing and moaning, that is. Are you in ALANON? No, you? |
Hey, guess what's new?!
On Wed, 22 Apr 2009 19:58:32 -0600, "SteveB"
wrote: "HK" wrote in message om... wrote: On Apr 22, 9:14 pm, "SteveB" wrote: Bzzzzztttttt. We do believe in the Bible, specifically the King James version. We do however see the Book of Mormon as an additional text to the bible, as with the Doctrine and Covenants and the Pearl of Great Price.. But like you, and I can see that you are open minded, I don't care to discuss it with the bigotshere... One of the articles of faith in Mormonism is: "We believe in the bible as far as it is correctly translated." That allows throwing out anything that contradicts Mormondom. The "historical" underpinnings of the Book of Mormon transcend the bizarre. Which book of Mormon are you referring to? There has been scores of versions, revised from the previous to make up for some error. If it is prophesy, there are no errors. Bibles have different "versions", but they don't rewrite things they disagree with. The "historical" underpinnings of the Book of Mormon transcend the bizarre. Just like their false Prophet, Joseph Smith. Careful readers might note I made no comment on the Book(s) of Mormon or their iterations, but, rather, the historical underpinnings of the work. Joseph Smith claimed he translated the work from a set of ancient golden plates he found in New York State after an angel told him where to look. Many scholars claim the work was plagarized, and give comparative sources. Then there is the business of Jesus visiting native Americans. Hey, believe whatever you want, right? Yes, even though the American Indians took issue with the church, and there were extensive DNA tests done. Results of which somehow quietly went away ............ Or at least are not talked about................ I'm sure the Mormons have baptized thousands of American Indians posthumously. Reminds me of the Christian missionaries who would chase oboriginals through the brush or jungle and kill them so they could be saved in the name of Jesus. They're all fruitcakes. |
Hey, guess what's new?!
"jps" wrote in message ... On Wed, 22 Apr 2009 19:10:07 -0600, "SteveB" wrote: "jps" wrote in message . .. On Wed, 22 Apr 2009 09:29:44 -0600, "SteveB" wrote: "jps" wrote in message m... On Tue, 21 Apr 2009 23:30:02 -0700, "Calif Bill" wrote: "jps" wrote in message news:vmjsu41trhgqr2hfqqiq08aq66j58kqep6@4ax. com... On Tue, 21 Apr 2009 15:39:02 -0700, "Calif Bill" wrote: "SteveB" wrote in message ... There's lots of paranoid lunatics with guns. Not hoodlums, ****ing lunatics. We're the only country on the planet, save from some real backwards tribals outposts, that host such a profusion of firepower. We're also the western civilization that sports the higest per capita rate of gun death in the world. Ah, yes. If we could only improve the technologies of underdeveloped nations and get them to quit using those machetes................... Those underdeveloped nations also get in to massive Genocide via firearms. Maybe if the genocided had more firearms the genocidee's might be less inclined to engage in genocide. Hell the genocidee's also seem to use hacking instuments with vigor. I don't think it's a good thing to compete with underdeveloped nations for the most savagery and violence. You seem to think that is all we do here in America. Seems to be showing up a lot in the paper, every day. Economic stress is not helping. Well, Pollyanna, what would YOU do? I mean, besides taking everyone's guns and other liberties and having ID numbers stenciled on the inside of the forearm. Steve ****in' well arm everybody Steve. Elementary schoolers need protection from bullies on the playground. If a kid wants your lunch money, blast 'em! Putting guns in everyone's hands is a recipe for disaster. If you don't recognize that you're ****ing stupid. Now you have me confused. In the first sentence of the first paragraph, you say arm everyone. Then in the second paragraph, you contradict yourself. You are wearing me down. Are you on drugs? That's because you're too ****ing dense to recognize sarcasm. Can't try to make a point without the nasty language? A real sign of immaturity. |
Hey, guess what's new?!
On Apr 23, 2:31*am, jps wrote:
On Wed, 22 Apr 2009 19:58:32 -0600, "SteveB" wrote: "HK" wrote in message om... wrote: On Apr 22, 9:14 pm, "SteveB" wrote: Bzzzzztttttt. We do believe in the Bible, specifically the King James version. We do however see the Book of Mormon as an additional text to the bible, as with the Doctrine and Covenants and the Pearl of Great Price.. But like you, and I can see that you are open minded, I don't care to discuss it with the bigotshere... One of the articles of faith in Mormonism is: *"We believe in the bible as far as it is correctly translated." *That allows throwing out anything that contradicts Mormondom. The "historical" underpinnings of the Book of Mormon transcend the bizarre. Which book of Mormon are you referring to? *There has been scores of versions, revised from the previous to make up for some error. *If it is prophesy, there are no errors. *Bibles have different "versions", but they don't rewrite things they disagree with. The "historical" underpinnings of the Book of Mormon transcend the bizarre. Just like their false Prophet, Joseph Smith. Careful readers might note I made no comment on the Book(s) of Mormon or their iterations, but, rather, the historical underpinnings of the work. Joseph Smith claimed he translated the work from a set of ancient golden plates he found in New York State after an angel told him where to look. Many scholars claim the work was plagarized, and give comparative sources. Then there is the business of Jesus visiting native Americans. Hey, believe whatever you want, right? Yes, even though the American Indians took issue with the church, and there were extensive DNA tests done. *Results of which somehow quietly went away ............ *Or at least are not talked about................ I'm sure the Mormons have baptized thousands of American Indians posthumously. Reminds me of the Christian missionaries who would chase oboriginals through the brush or jungle and kill them so they could be saved in the name of Jesus. They're all fruitcakes.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Comparing posthumous baptizims which of course hurts nobody, to killing? You are a fool, a troll, and a liar... You are a joke... |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:18 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com