On Tue, 28 Apr 2009 07:29:41 -0400, BAR wrote:

http://www.boat-ed.com/ wrote:
John H wrote:
On Mon, 27 Apr 2009 20:23:23 -0700, jps wrote:

On Mon, 27 Apr 2009 17:54:59 -0700 (PDT), Tim
wrote:

On Apr 26, 8:32 pm, jps wrote:
On Sun, 26 Apr 2009 13:13:44 -0700 (PDT), Tim
wrote:



On Apr 26, 1:36 pm, jps wrote:
On Sat, 25 Apr 2009 16:08:16 -0700 (PDT), Tim
wrote:
On Apr 25, 4:22 pm, jps wrote:
On Fri, 24 Apr 2009 19:14:27 -0700 (PDT), Tim

wrote:
On Apr 24, 7:47 pm, D K wrote:
Tim wrote:
On Apr 24, 12:05 am, jps wrote:
On Thu, 23 Apr 2009 20:37:29 -0700 (PDT), Tim

wrote:
On Apr 23, 8:18 pm, jps wrote:
You stupid ****, ... ****in' cocksuckers like you,...
****in' tax cheat.
THAR-SHEEE -BLEWWWWWWS!
lol!
I knew you were going to errupt sometime.
HAHAHAHAHAHA!
BTW, were you using bad language when you said STFU?
Thought that was
below you.
it may be below him, but never below you.... LOL!
It was for the benefit of DicK. Just subsequent to asking
me about my
cussing, he said STFU.
If I'm not mistaken, one of the letters represents the word
****.
Get it?
Yeah, I got it man. you're a a hot headed know-it-all. and
yes, it's
probably best that you not have a fire arm. Not only for
your safety
but for the safety of others around you.Otherwise you could
be the
next Bernard Getz. and I know you wouldn't want that.... So
yes, it's
probably best that you not be around fire arms.
Just let me know when your little brain needs some remedial
explanation and I'll be happy to provide it. Or better
yet, consult
the Freak as he's much closer to your speed.
nah, you've already shown me how fast (or slow) you can go.
IMHO? it sux to be you....
There you go. Tim is as level-headed as they come and YOU
pushed him
over the edge.
Oh no man. I'm not over the edge. I'm just sitting here
snickering at
the whole anti-liberty" thing that JPS is trying to promote that
lawful, law-abiding citizens need to have their firearms taken
away.
"Arms are the only true badge of liberty. The possession of
arms is
the distinction of a free man from a slave..."
-Andrew Fletcher of Saltoun, 1698
Couldn't come up with anything more contemporary?
A real renaissance man you are.
Do I need to?
You could quote the bible and make anyone out to be guilty of a sin
that requires stoning to death.
Doesn't make it right or even relevant.
No, actually i can't, but you could give it a good try.
I'm more into the pragmatic than the dogmatic. The bible is a fine
set of parables that may people take literally. It doesn't make them
right or relevant.
Y'know, Thomas Jefferson thought exactly the same way, but one main
difference is that he was a large advocate for firearm ownership.
230 years ago.

Anything changed since then?

Yeah..., you, Pelosi, and Reid came along. Reason enough to keep and
bear arms. Harry exhibits a lot of sense in this one area. He
maintains his proficiency in the use of firearms. He even publishes
photographs of his targets - or someone's targets!
--
John H

For a great time, go here first... http://tinyurl.com/d3vxvm

I have no problems if someone wants to own a firearm, as long as the
person is not a lunatic. Anyone who publishes photographs of his
targets, sounds like he should not own a firearm.


Being proud of your shooting abilities is not lunacy.

However, Krause is a lunatic.

Now I feel better about wearing my marksmanship badges when I'm
golfing.

http://www.usamilitarymedals.com/images/EXPERTNICK3.jpg
--
John H

For a great time, go here first... http://tinyurl.com/d3vxvm

John H wrote:
On Tue, 28 Apr 2009 07:29:41 -0400, BAR wrote:

http://www.boat-ed.com/ wrote:
John H wrote:
On Mon, 27 Apr 2009 20:23:23 -0700, jps wrote:

On Mon, 27 Apr 2009 17:54:59 -0700 (PDT), Tim
wrote:

On Apr 26, 8:32 pm, jps wrote:
On Sun, 26 Apr 2009 13:13:44 -0700 (PDT), Tim
wrote:



On Apr 26, 1:36 pm, jps wrote:
On Sat, 25 Apr 2009 16:08:16 -0700 (PDT), Tim
wrote:
On Apr 25, 4:22 pm, jps wrote:
On Fri, 24 Apr 2009 19:14:27 -0700 (PDT), Tim

wrote:
On Apr 24, 7:47 pm, D K wrote:
Tim wrote:
On Apr 24, 12:05 am, jps wrote:
On Thu, 23 Apr 2009 20:37:29 -0700 (PDT), Tim

wrote:
On Apr 23, 8:18 pm, jps wrote:
You stupid ****, ... ****in' cocksuckers like you,...
****in' tax cheat.
THAR-SHEEE -BLEWWWWWWS!
lol!
I knew you were going to errupt sometime.
HAHAHAHAHAHA!
BTW, were you using bad language when you said STFU?
Thought that was
below you.
it may be below him, but never below you.... LOL!
It was for the benefit of DicK. Just subsequent to asking
me about my
cussing, he said STFU.
If I'm not mistaken, one of the letters represents the word
****.
Get it?
Yeah, I got it man. you're a a hot headed know-it-all. and
yes, it's
probably best that you not have a fire arm. Not only for
your safety
but for the safety of others around you.Otherwise you could
be the
next Bernard Getz. and I know you wouldn't want that.... So
yes, it's
probably best that you not be around fire arms.
Just let me know when your little brain needs some remedial
explanation and I'll be happy to provide it. Or better
yet, consult
the Freak as he's much closer to your speed.
nah, you've already shown me how fast (or slow) you can go.
IMHO? it sux to be you....
There you go. Tim is as level-headed as they come and YOU
pushed him
over the edge.
Oh no man. I'm not over the edge. I'm just sitting here
snickering at
the whole anti-liberty" thing that JPS is trying to promote that
lawful, law-abiding citizens need to have their firearms taken
away.
"Arms are the only true badge of liberty. The possession of
arms is
the distinction of a free man from a slave..."
-Andrew Fletcher of Saltoun, 1698
Couldn't come up with anything more contemporary?
A real renaissance man you are.
Do I need to?
You could quote the bible and make anyone out to be guilty of a sin
that requires stoning to death.
Doesn't make it right or even relevant.
No, actually i can't, but you could give it a good try.
I'm more into the pragmatic than the dogmatic. The bible is a fine
set of parables that may people take literally. It doesn't make them
right or relevant.
Y'know, Thomas Jefferson thought exactly the same way, but one main
difference is that he was a large advocate for firearm ownership.
230 years ago.

Anything changed since then?
Yeah..., you, Pelosi, and Reid came along. Reason enough to keep and
bear arms. Harry exhibits a lot of sense in this one area. He
maintains his proficiency in the use of firearms. He even publishes
photographs of his targets - or someone's targets!
--
John H

For a great time, go here first... http://tinyurl.com/d3vxvm
I have no problems if someone wants to own a firearm, as long as the
person is not a lunatic. Anyone who publishes photographs of his
targets, sounds like he should not own a firearm.

Being proud of your shooting abilities is not lunacy.

However, Krause is a lunatic.

Now I feel better about wearing my marksmanship badges when I'm
golfing.

http://www.usamilitarymedals.com/images/EXPERTNICK3.jpg

Did you shoot your eye out?

On Tue, 28 Apr 2009 08:15:15 -0400, BAR wrote:

John H wrote:
On Tue, 28 Apr 2009 07:29:41 -0400, BAR wrote:

http://www.boat-ed.com/ wrote:
John H wrote:
On Mon, 27 Apr 2009 20:23:23 -0700, jps wrote:

On Mon, 27 Apr 2009 17:54:59 -0700 (PDT), Tim
wrote:

On Apr 26, 8:32 pm, jps wrote:
On Sun, 26 Apr 2009 13:13:44 -0700 (PDT), Tim
wrote:



On Apr 26, 1:36 pm, jps wrote:
On Sat, 25 Apr 2009 16:08:16 -0700 (PDT), Tim
wrote:
On Apr 25, 4:22 pm, jps wrote:
On Fri, 24 Apr 2009 19:14:27 -0700 (PDT), Tim

wrote:
On Apr 24, 7:47 pm, D K wrote:
Tim wrote:
On Apr 24, 12:05 am, jps wrote:
On Thu, 23 Apr 2009 20:37:29 -0700 (PDT), Tim

wrote:
On Apr 23, 8:18 pm, jps wrote:
You stupid ****, ... ****in' cocksuckers like you,...
****in' tax cheat.
THAR-SHEEE -BLEWWWWWWS!
lol!
I knew you were going to errupt sometime.
HAHAHAHAHAHA!
BTW, were you using bad language when you said STFU?
Thought that was
below you.
it may be below him, but never below you.... LOL!
It was for the benefit of DicK. Just subsequent to asking
me about my
cussing, he said STFU.
If I'm not mistaken, one of the letters represents the word
****.
Get it?
Yeah, I got it man. you're a a hot headed know-it-all. and
yes, it's
probably best that you not have a fire arm. Not only for
your safety
but for the safety of others around you.Otherwise you could
be the
next Bernard Getz. and I know you wouldn't want that.... So
yes, it's
probably best that you not be around fire arms.
Just let me know when your little brain needs some remedial
explanation and I'll be happy to provide it. Or better
yet, consult
the Freak as he's much closer to your speed.
nah, you've already shown me how fast (or slow) you can go.
IMHO? it sux to be you....
There you go. Tim is as level-headed as they come and YOU
pushed him
over the edge.
Oh no man. I'm not over the edge. I'm just sitting here
snickering at
the whole anti-liberty" thing that JPS is trying to promote that
lawful, law-abiding citizens need to have their firearms taken
away.
"Arms are the only true badge of liberty. The possession of
arms is
the distinction of a free man from a slave..."
-Andrew Fletcher of Saltoun, 1698
Couldn't come up with anything more contemporary?
A real renaissance man you are.
Do I need to?
You could quote the bible and make anyone out to be guilty of a sin
that requires stoning to death.
Doesn't make it right or even relevant.
No, actually i can't, but you could give it a good try.
I'm more into the pragmatic than the dogmatic. The bible is a fine
set of parables that may people take literally. It doesn't make them
right or relevant.
Y'know, Thomas Jefferson thought exactly the same way, but one main
difference is that he was a large advocate for firearm ownership.
230 years ago.

Anything changed since then?
Yeah..., you, Pelosi, and Reid came along. Reason enough to keep and
bear arms. Harry exhibits a lot of sense in this one area. He
maintains his proficiency in the use of firearms. He even publishes
photographs of his targets - or someone's targets!
--
John H

For a great time, go here first... http://tinyurl.com/d3vxvm
I have no problems if someone wants to own a firearm, as long as the
person is not a lunatic. Anyone who publishes photographs of his
targets, sounds like he should not own a firearm.

Being proud of your shooting abilities is not lunacy.

However, Krause is a lunatic.

Now I feel better about wearing my marksmanship badges when I'm
golfing.

http://www.usamilitarymedals.com/images/EXPERTNICK3.jpg

Did you shoot your eye out?

Say huh?
--
John H

For a great time, go here first... http://tinyurl.com/d3vxvm

On Mon, 27 Apr 2009 21:51:04 -0700, "CalifBill"
wrote:


"jps" wrote in message
.. .
On Mon, 27 Apr 2009 17:54:59 -0700 (PDT), Tim
wrote:

On Apr 26, 8:32 pm, jps wrote:
On Sun, 26 Apr 2009 13:13:44 -0700 (PDT), Tim
wrote:



On Apr 26, 1:36 pm, jps wrote:
On Sat, 25 Apr 2009 16:08:16 -0700 (PDT), Tim
wrote:

On Apr 25, 4:22 pm, jps wrote:
On Fri, 24 Apr 2009 19:14:27 -0700 (PDT), Tim

wrote:

On Apr 24, 7:47 pm, D K wrote:
Tim wrote:
On Apr 24, 12:05 am, jps wrote:
On Thu, 23 Apr 2009 20:37:29 -0700 (PDT), Tim

wrote:

On Apr 23, 8:18 pm, jps wrote:
You stupid ****, ... ****in' cocksuckers like you,...
****in' tax cheat.
THAR-SHEEE -BLEWWWWWWS!
lol!
I knew you were going to errupt sometime.
HAHAHAHAHAHA!
BTW, were you using bad language when you said STFU?
Thought that was
below you.
it may be below him, but never below you.... LOL!
It was for the benefit of DicK. Just subsequent to asking me
about my
cussing, he said STFU.

If I'm not mistaken, one of the letters represents the word
****.

Get it?

Yeah, I got it man. you're a a hot headed know-it-all. and
yes, it's
probably best that you not have a fire arm. Not only for your
safety
but for the safety of others around you.Otherwise you could
be the
next Bernard Getz. and I know you wouldn't want that.... So
yes, it's
probably best that you not be around fire arms.

Just let me know when your little brain needs some remedial
explanation and I'll be happy to provide it. Or better yet,
consult
the Freak as he's much closer to your speed.

nah, you've already shown me how fast (or slow) you can go.

IMHO? it sux to be you....

There you go. Tim is as level-headed as they come and YOU
pushed him
over the edge.

Oh no man. I'm not over the edge. I'm just sitting here
snickering at
the whole anti-liberty" thing that JPS is trying to promote that
lawful, law-abiding citizens need to have their firearms taken
away.

"Arms are the only true badge of liberty. The possession of arms
is
the distinction of a free man from a slave..."

-Andrew Fletcher of Saltoun, 1698

Couldn't come up with anything more contemporary?

A real renaissance man you are.

Do I need to?

You could quote the bible and make anyone out to be guilty of a sin
that requires stoning to death.

Doesn't make it right or even relevant.

No, actually i can't, but you could give it a good try.

I'm more into the pragmatic than the dogmatic. The bible is a fine
set of parables that may people take literally. It doesn't make them
right or relevant.

Y'know, Thomas Jefferson thought exactly the same way, but one main
difference is that he was a large advocate for firearm ownership.

230 years ago.

Anything changed since then? Yes, in the 1950's we decided to keep
standing armies to protect America.

We don't need no stinking militias anymore.

Standing armies are a reason to keep militias, an armed populace.

Oh, was that the genesis for the idea of militias?

Allow me to point out the folly. The standing army we were supposed
to be protecting against was the enemy's, not our own.

On Tue, 28 Apr 2009 07:30:54 -0400, BAR wrote:

CalifBill wrote:
"jps" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 27 Apr 2009 17:54:59 -0700 (PDT), Tim
wrote:

On Apr 26, 8:32 pm, jps wrote:
On Sun, 26 Apr 2009 13:13:44 -0700 (PDT), Tim
wrote:



On Apr 26, 1:36 pm, jps wrote:
On Sat, 25 Apr 2009 16:08:16 -0700 (PDT), Tim
wrote:
On Apr 25, 4:22 pm, jps wrote:
On Fri, 24 Apr 2009 19:14:27 -0700 (PDT), Tim

wrote:
On Apr 24, 7:47 pm, D K wrote:
Tim wrote:
On Apr 24, 12:05 am, jps wrote:
On Thu, 23 Apr 2009 20:37:29 -0700 (PDT), Tim

wrote:
On Apr 23, 8:18 pm, jps wrote:
You stupid ****, ... ****in' cocksuckers like you,...
****in' tax cheat.
THAR-SHEEE -BLEWWWWWWS!
lol!
I knew you were going to errupt sometime.
HAHAHAHAHAHA!
BTW, were you using bad language when you said STFU?
Thought that was
below you.
it may be below him, but never below you.... LOL!
It was for the benefit of DicK. Just subsequent to asking me
about my
cussing, he said STFU.
If I'm not mistaken, one of the letters represents the word
****.
Get it?
Yeah, I got it man. you're a a hot headed know-it-all. and
yes, it's
probably best that you not have a fire arm. Not only for your
safety
but for the safety of others around you.Otherwise you could
be the
next Bernard Getz. and I know you wouldn't want that.... So
yes, it's
probably best that you not be around fire arms.
Just let me know when your little brain needs some remedial
explanation and I'll be happy to provide it. Or better yet,
consult
the Freak as he's much closer to your speed.
nah, you've already shown me how fast (or slow) you can go.
IMHO? it sux to be you....
There you go. Tim is as level-headed as they come and YOU
pushed him
over the edge.
Oh no man. I'm not over the edge. I'm just sitting here
snickering at
the whole anti-liberty" thing that JPS is trying to promote that
lawful, law-abiding citizens need to have their firearms taken
away.
"Arms are the only true badge of liberty. The possession of arms
is
the distinction of a free man from a slave..."
-Andrew Fletcher of Saltoun, 1698
Couldn't come up with anything more contemporary?
A real renaissance man you are.
Do I need to?
You could quote the bible and make anyone out to be guilty of a sin
that requires stoning to death.
Doesn't make it right or even relevant.
No, actually i can't, but you could give it a good try.
I'm more into the pragmatic than the dogmatic. The bible is a fine
set of parables that may people take literally. It doesn't make them
right or relevant.
Y'know, Thomas Jefferson thought exactly the same way, but one main
difference is that he was a large advocate for firearm ownership.
230 years ago.

Anything changed since then? Yes, in the 1950's we decided to keep
standing armies to protect America.

We don't need no stinking militias anymore.

Standing armies are a reason to keep militias, an armed populace.

JPS is a poster child for literacy, civics and US history.

BAR is a poster child for vapid arguments.

"jps" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 27 Apr 2009 21:51:04 -0700, "CalifBill"
wrote:


"jps" wrote in message
. ..
On Mon, 27 Apr 2009 17:54:59 -0700 (PDT), Tim
wrote:

On Apr 26, 8:32 pm, jps wrote:
On Sun, 26 Apr 2009 13:13:44 -0700 (PDT), Tim
wrote:



On Apr 26, 1:36 pm, jps wrote:
On Sat, 25 Apr 2009 16:08:16 -0700 (PDT), Tim
wrote:

On Apr 25, 4:22 pm, jps wrote:
On Fri, 24 Apr 2009 19:14:27 -0700 (PDT), Tim

wrote:

On Apr 24, 7:47 pm, D K wrote:
Tim wrote:
On Apr 24, 12:05 am, jps wrote:
On Thu, 23 Apr 2009 20:37:29 -0700 (PDT), Tim

wrote:

On Apr 23, 8:18 pm, jps wrote:
You stupid ****, ... ****in' cocksuckers like you,...
****in' tax cheat.
THAR-SHEEE -BLEWWWWWWS!
lol!
I knew you were going to errupt sometime.
HAHAHAHAHAHA!
BTW, were you using bad language when you said STFU?
Thought that was
below you.
it may be below him, but never below you.... LOL!
It was for the benefit of DicK. Just subsequent to asking
me
about my
cussing, he said STFU.

If I'm not mistaken, one of the letters represents the
word
****.

Get it?

Yeah, I got it man. you're a a hot headed know-it-all. and
yes, it's
probably best that you not have a fire arm. Not only for
your
safety
but for the safety of others around you.Otherwise you could
be the
next Bernard Getz. and I know you wouldn't want that.... So
yes, it's
probably best that you not be around fire arms.

Just let me know when your little brain needs some
remedial
explanation and I'll be happy to provide it. Or better
yet,
consult
the Freak as he's much closer to your speed.

nah, you've already shown me how fast (or slow) you can go.

IMHO? it sux to be you....

There you go. Tim is as level-headed as they come and YOU
pushed him
over the edge.

Oh no man. I'm not over the edge. I'm just sitting here
snickering at
the whole anti-liberty" thing that JPS is trying to promote
that
lawful, law-abiding citizens need to have their firearms taken
away.

"Arms are the only true badge of liberty. The possession of
arms
is
the distinction of a free man from a slave..."

-Andrew Fletcher of Saltoun, 1698

Couldn't come up with anything more contemporary?

A real renaissance man you are.

Do I need to?

You could quote the bible and make anyone out to be guilty of a sin
that requires stoning to death.

Doesn't make it right or even relevant.

No, actually i can't, but you could give it a good try.

I'm more into the pragmatic than the dogmatic. The bible is a fine
set of parables that may people take literally. It doesn't make them
right or relevant.

Y'know, Thomas Jefferson thought exactly the same way, but one main
difference is that he was a large advocate for firearm ownership.

230 years ago.

Anything changed since then? Yes, in the 1950's we decided to keep
standing armies to protect America.

We don't need no stinking militias anymore.

Standing armies are a reason to keep militias, an armed populace.

Oh, was that the genesis for the idea of militias?

Allow me to point out the folly. The standing army we were supposed
to be protecting against was the enemy's, not our own.

The standing army was of a despotic ruler.

jps wrote:
On Mon, 27 Apr 2009 09:54:55 -0400, Johnson
wrote:

wrote:
On Apr 24, 12:06 pm, Johnson wrote:
jps wrote:
You stupid ****
****in' cocksuckers like you,
****in' tax cheat.
An angry little impotent man you are.

Small wonder you fear the gun.

Johnson
Amazing! Must make you feel like a real man when toting your phallic
symbol of a gun, huh? Any man with any lick of sense would "fear the
gun". They are lethal. Doesn't matter how big or bad you think you
are, you can be killed by a .22.
Hmmmmm. Weird reaction.

I don't fear guns. JPS does, and you also. I can imagine you all
trembling when in the presence of a gun toting policeman.

If any fear on my part it would be of the person wielding (not toting) a
gun.

And keep your licking to yourself. Gross.

Johnson.

I don't fear firearms. I fear the people who own them who either
don't know how to handle them properly, when they should be used,
proper storage and those that are mentally fragile or imbalanced.

Although maybe a mistake, I hold the police in esteem. Whenever I've
had occasion to work with or require their assistance, I find they're
usually very professional, efficient and willing to help.

I trust them with firearms, even the Republican ones.

Cops are busted all the time for improper use of their firearms. Some
are deemed mentally unfit to carry one.

How can you judge the civilians who have guns?

Living in fear might be your only choice. Moving to a country that bans
firearms won't help you - the criminals still have them.

Sleep with one eye open, pansy.

http://www.boat-ed.com/ wrote:
John H wrote:
On Mon, 27 Apr 2009 20:23:23 -0700, jps wrote:

On Mon, 27 Apr 2009 17:54:59 -0700 (PDT), Tim
wrote:

On Apr 26, 8:32 pm, jps wrote:
On Sun, 26 Apr 2009 13:13:44 -0700 (PDT), Tim
wrote:



On Apr 26, 1:36 pm, jps wrote:
On Sat, 25 Apr 2009 16:08:16 -0700 (PDT), Tim
wrote:
On Apr 25, 4:22 pm, jps wrote:
On Fri, 24 Apr 2009 19:14:27 -0700 (PDT), Tim

wrote:
On Apr 24, 7:47 pm, D K wrote:
Tim wrote:
On Apr 24, 12:05 am, jps wrote:
On Thu, 23 Apr 2009 20:37:29 -0700 (PDT), Tim

wrote:
On Apr 23, 8:18 pm, jps wrote:
You stupid ****, ... ****in' cocksuckers like you,...
****in' tax cheat.
THAR-SHEEE -BLEWWWWWWS!
lol!
I knew you were going to errupt sometime.
HAHAHAHAHAHA!
BTW, were you using bad language when you said STFU?
Thought that was
below you.
it may be below him, but never below you.... LOL!
It was for the benefit of DicK. Just subsequent to asking
me about my
cussing, he said STFU.
If I'm not mistaken, one of the letters represents the word
****.
Get it?
Yeah, I got it man. you're a a hot headed know-it-all. and
yes, it's
probably best that you not have a fire arm. Not only for
your safety
but for the safety of others around you.Otherwise you could
be the
next Bernard Getz. and I know you wouldn't want that.... So
yes, it's
probably best that you not be around fire arms.
Just let me know when your little brain needs some remedial
explanation and I'll be happy to provide it. Or better
yet, consult
the Freak as he's much closer to your speed.
nah, you've already shown me how fast (or slow) you can go.
IMHO? it sux to be you....
There you go. Tim is as level-headed as they come and YOU
pushed him
over the edge.
Oh no man. I'm not over the edge. I'm just sitting here
snickering at
the whole anti-liberty" thing that JPS is trying to promote that
lawful, law-abiding citizens need to have their firearms taken
away.
"Arms are the only true badge of liberty. The possession of
arms is
the distinction of a free man from a slave..."
-Andrew Fletcher of Saltoun, 1698
Couldn't come up with anything more contemporary?
A real renaissance man you are.
Do I need to?
You could quote the bible and make anyone out to be guilty of a sin
that requires stoning to death.
Doesn't make it right or even relevant.
No, actually i can't, but you could give it a good try.
I'm more into the pragmatic than the dogmatic. The bible is a fine
set of parables that may people take literally. It doesn't make them
right or relevant.
Y'know, Thomas Jefferson thought exactly the same way, but one main
difference is that he was a large advocate for firearm ownership.
230 years ago.

Anything changed since then?

Yeah..., you, Pelosi, and Reid came along. Reason enough to keep and
bear arms. Harry exhibits a lot of sense in this one area. He
maintains his proficiency in the use of firearms. He even publishes
photographs of his targets - or someone's targets!
--
John H

For a great time, go here first... http://tinyurl.com/d3vxvm

I have no problems if someone wants to own a firearm, as long as the
person is not a lunatic. Anyone who publishes photographs of his
targets, sounds like he should not own a firearm.


What if they name them "Stumpy"?

On Wed, 29 Apr 2009 20:40:54 -0400, D K
wrote:

jps wrote:
On Mon, 27 Apr 2009 09:54:55 -0400, Johnson
wrote:

wrote:
On Apr 24, 12:06 pm, Johnson wrote:
jps wrote:
You stupid ****
****in' cocksuckers like you,
****in' tax cheat.
An angry little impotent man you are.

Small wonder you fear the gun.

Johnson
Amazing! Must make you feel like a real man when toting your phallic
symbol of a gun, huh? Any man with any lick of sense would "fear the
gun". They are lethal. Doesn't matter how big or bad you think you
are, you can be killed by a .22.
Hmmmmm. Weird reaction.

I don't fear guns. JPS does, and you also. I can imagine you all
trembling when in the presence of a gun toting policeman.

If any fear on my part it would be of the person wielding (not toting) a
gun.

And keep your licking to yourself. Gross.

Johnson.

I don't fear firearms. I fear the people who own them who either
don't know how to handle them properly, when they should be used,
proper storage and those that are mentally fragile or imbalanced.

Although maybe a mistake, I hold the police in esteem. Whenever I've
had occasion to work with or require their assistance, I find they're
usually very professional, efficient and willing to help.

I trust them with firearms, even the Republican ones.

Cops are busted all the time for improper use of their firearms. Some
are deemed mentally unfit to carry one.

How can you judge the civilians who have guns?

Living in fear might be your only choice. Moving to a country that bans
firearms won't help you - the criminals still have them.

Sleep with one eye open, pansy.

God you're an idiot.

The pansies are the ones who think they need a gun to be safe. I
expect you have several and at least one is within reach so you can
pump hot lead into the boogeyman that lives under your bed.

The pansies are the ones who take their own lives because it's easier
than living. Houses with guns are far more likely to experience a
suicide.

I don't live in fear. I live in fear for what our country is
becoming. The likes of you is proof.

"jps" wrote in message
...
snip...
The pansies are the ones who take their own lives because it's easier
than living. Houses with guns are far more likely to experience a
suicide.

snip..

Wow...is that true?
How can I buy a gun and have it delivered to DK?