![]() |
Hope but no change
I didnt like the patriot act either and thought it was far too
extreme. Liberals hated it. So, now that Obama is in office, why has there not been a groundswell to change it. With a majority in both houses of congress in office it should be easy. So why not? I think the answer is that the Obominations will find it useful against anti- Obama people. |
Hope but no change
On Jan 26, 10:22*am, Frogwatch wrote:
I didnt like the patriot act either and thought it was far too extreme. *Liberals hated it. *So, now that Obama is in office, why has there not been a groundswell to change it. *With a majority in both houses of congress in office it should be easy. *So why not? *I think the answer is that the Obominations will find it useful against anti- Obama people. Wonder if he has ordered up the opposititon FBI files yet like Billary did... |
Hope but no change
Frogwatch wrote:
I didnt like the patriot act either and thought it was far too extreme. Liberals hated it. So, now that Obama is in office, why has there not been a groundswell to change it. With a majority in both houses of congress in office it should be easy. So why not? I think the answer is that the Obominations will find it useful against anti- Obama people. You seem to think everything should be done at once. That's the simple-minded, Republican approach. That sort of approach is kaput. |
Hope but no change
Frogwatch wrote:
I didnt like the patriot act either and thought it was far too extreme. Liberals hated it. So, now that Obama is in office, why has there not been a groundswell to change it. With a majority in both houses of congress in office it should be easy. So why not? I think the answer is that the Obominations will find it useful against anti- Obama people. The attitude is control. In order to achieve that total monitoring an preemtive identification of potential threats or crystal ball looking is neccessary. Everybody is a potential terrorists according to the inner city socialist or facist, take your pick, Elites that dreamed up this Police State apparatus. The focus was to prevent terrorism. The Politicans can identify any one or group they select as a terrorist or hostile. If you give them the tools they will find a use for them. Our Agencies were doing a fine job. There was inter agency competition and turf squabbling but that didn't permit the Terrorists to attack us. There is no way to protect, absolutely, our Society from a multiple prong scouting and attack by a fanatical murder culture of Islam. everywhere Islam is there are Terrorists and terrorism. All of them don't commit it but their religon and their culture mandates their participation, or support with money, and every other asset. So far almost all Homeland Security has done is mad Americans suspicious, paranoid and edgy. We have no anonimity and don't dare look askance at anything. Anything can be viewed as suspicious. Quite immigrating tis culture into our Country and we will greatly diminish their threat. |
Hope but no change
Frog Britches wrote:
Frogwatch wrote: I didnt like the patriot act either and thought it was far too extreme. Liberals hated it. So, now that Obama is in office, why has there not been a groundswell to change it. With a majority in both houses of congress in office it should be easy. So why not? I think the answer is that the Obominations will find it useful against anti- Obama people. The attitude is control. In order to achieve that total monitoring an preemtive identification of potential threats or crystal ball looking is neccessary. Everybody is a potential terrorists according to the inner city socialist or facist, take your pick, Elites that dreamed up this Police State apparatus. The focus was to prevent terrorism. The Politicans can identify any one or group they select as a terrorist or hostile. If you give them the tools they will find a use for them. Our Agencies were doing a fine job. There was inter agency competition and turf squabbling but that didn't permit the Terrorists to attack us. There is no way to protect, absolutely, our Society from a multiple prong scouting and attack by a fanatical murder culture of Islam. everywhere Islam is there are Terrorists and terrorism. All of them don't commit it but their religon and their culture mandates their participation, or support with money, and every other asset. So far almost all Homeland Security has done is mad Americans suspicious, paranoid and edgy. We have no anonimity and don't dare look askance at anything. Anything can be viewed as suspicious. Quite immigrating tis culture into our Country and we will greatly diminish their threat. I don't recall your speaking out against Homeland Insecurity while its perpetrators, the Bush Admin, was in power. |
Hope but no change
HK wrote:
Frog Britches wrote: Frogwatch wrote: I didnt like the patriot act either and thought it was far too extreme. Liberals hated it. So, now that Obama is in office, why has there not been a groundswell to change it. With a majority in both houses of congress in office it should be easy. So why not? I think the answer is that the Obominations will find it useful against anti- Obama people. The attitude is control. In order to achieve that total monitoring an preemtive identification of potential threats or crystal ball looking is neccessary. Everybody is a potential terrorists according to the inner city socialist or facist, take your pick, Elites that dreamed up this Police State apparatus. The focus was to prevent terrorism. The Politicans can identify any one or group they select as a terrorist or hostile. If you give them the tools they will find a use for them. Our Agencies were doing a fine job. There was inter agency competition and turf squabbling but that didn't permit the Terrorists to attack us. There is no way to protect, absolutely, our Society from a multiple prong scouting and attack by a fanatical murder culture of Islam. everywhere Islam is there are Terrorists and terrorism. All of them don't commit it but their religon and their culture mandates their participation, or support with money, and every other asset. So far almost all Homeland Security has done is mad Americans suspicious, paranoid and edgy. We have no anonimity and don't dare look askance at anything. Anything can be viewed as suspicious. Quite immigrating tis culture into our Country and we will greatly diminish their threat. I don't recall your speaking out against Homeland Insecurity while its perpetrators, the Bush Admin, was in power. Your recelector is on the fritz. |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:24 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com